Misplaced Pages

Criticism of Hinduism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:31, 25 August 2012 edit116.202.167.115 (talk) Mythology← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:06, 11 December 2024 edit undoJiltedsquirrel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users705 edits Early opposition: replace irrelevant citation with citation needed 
(644 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}}
{{about|social and cultural criticism of Hinduism|bias and/or prejudice against Hindus|anti-Hindu}}
{{Criticism of religion sidebar}}


'''Criticism of Hinduism''' has been applied to both the historical and the current aspects of Hinduism, notably the ] and the ] practice.
{{Weasel|date=July 2010}}
{{Hinduism}}
Some of the practices and beliefs held by ] have been criticized, both by Hindus and non-Hindus.
Early ]s, such as ], had questioned practices such as ] and discrimination based on the ] and Jantu Bali i.e. animal sacrifice. However, these are no longer prevalent in Independent India.


==Historical background==
There was no mention of self immolation (Sati) in any of the Hindu scriptures. Social practices evolved to this pass with passage of time particularly with invasion of India by barbarians from foreign lands.<ref>Axel Michaels, ''Hinduism: Past and Present'' 188-97 (Princeton 2004) ISBN 0-691-08953-1</ref><ref>{{Cite web
<!-- Formation of ] - ]
|title=Hindu Wisdom: The Caste System
Early opposition against Brahminism: Buddhism, Agamic traditions
|url=http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Caste_System.htm
Formation of caste-based endogamy
|accessdate=2006-12-08
Bhakti and the ideal of the egalitarian society
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web
Islam, monotheism, and theocracy
|title=Caste prejudice has nothing to do with the Hindu scriptures
Colonialism, monotheism, and Indian modernism
|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/india/story/0,,1967446,00.html
Hindu-nationalism and the forging of a Hindu-identity
|author=Nitin Mehta
Post-independence -->{{expand section|date=January 2021}}
|publisher=The Guardian
|date=2006-12-08
|accessdate=2006-12-08
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web
|title=Is Caste System Intrinsic to Hinduism? Demolishing a Myth
|url=http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=2003&leaf=11&filename=6474&filetype=html
|author=]
|publisher=Economic and Political Weekly
|date=2003-11-08
|accessdate=2006-12-08
|archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070312101009/http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=2003&leaf=11&filename=6474&filetype=html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-03-12}}</ref><ref name="brit"> Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service.</ref><ref name="rf"></ref> Similarly several critics allege that the stringent caste system evolved over several centuries a by-product of the ] that is mentioned in the ancient ]s.<ref>{{Cite web
|title=Face to faith
|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1951144,00.html
|author=David Haslam
|publisher=The Guardian
|date=2006-11-18
|accessdate=2006-12-08
}}</ref>


=== Early opposition ===
==Mythology==
Some of the earliest criticism of ] texts, including the ] and especially the ], come from the ] (or renunciate) traditions, including ] and ]. Sramana scholars viewed Brahminical philosophy as "heretical".{{Citation needed|date=August 2024}} In particular, Sramanas denied the ''sruti'' (divine) nature of the Vedas and opposed sacrificial rituals which were at the heart of Brahminical philosophy at the time.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Thapar|first=Romila|date=1989|title=Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modern Search for a Hindu Identity|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/312738|journal=Modern Asian Studies|volume=23|issue=2|pages=209–231|doi=10.1017/S0026749X00001049 |jstor=312738 |s2cid=145293468 |issn=0026-749X}}</ref>
''New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology'' (1977) states: "Indian mythology is an inextricable jungle of luxuriant growths. When you enter it you lose the light of day and all clear sense of direction. In a brief exposition one cannot avoid over-simplification. But at least one can point out how, in the most favorable circumstances, paths may be traced leading to a methodical exploration of this vast domain"<ref>{{Cite book
| title = New Larousse Encyclopedia Of Mythology
| author = ]
| publisher = Hamlyn
| location = Indian mythology
| year = 1977
}}</ref>


The criticisms of Hinduism and Brahminical philosophy by Sramana scholars occurred primarily during the 6th century BCE to around 8th century CE in ancient India.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://cdn.visionias.in/value_added_material/1a628-religion-and-philosophy.pdf|publisher=Vision IAS|title=Quick Revision Module (UPSC Prelims 2024) Art & Culture Religion & Philosophy-1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240930162603/https://cdn.visionias.in/value_added_material/1a628-religion-and-philosophy.pdf|archive-date=30 September 2024|url-status=live}}</ref> This period witnessed a flourishing of diverse philosophical schools, including Yoga, Buddhism, Jainism, ], and other Sramana traditions that engaged in debates with orthodox Vedic practices.{{citation needed |date=December 2024}}
Only a true religious can understand Hinduism. Actually,it is based on universal principles of nature,life and universe.For example look their basic mantra i.e. Gayatri Mantra,it is about the Godess Sandhya or gayatri that is morning or evening time it is regarded good time to pray or be calm in every religion or living style/pattern whether human or not.


The Sramanas rejected the rigid social hierarchy enforced by the Brahmins, which placed individuals into fixed social classes from birth. Sramana scholars criticized the emphasis on elaborate rituals and sacrificial practices in Brahminical philosophy. They believed that true spiritual progress could not be achieved through external ceremonies, but rather through internal transformation and self-realization.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Johri |first=Arushi |title=Brahminic and Shramanic Traditions in Ancient India |url=https://www.studocu.com/in/document/university-of-delhi/political-science/brahminic-and-shramanic-traditions-in-ancient-india/12388292}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite journal |volume=5|year=2018|journal=Than Hsiang Buddhist Research e-Journal |edition=Special|publisher=Than Hsiang Buddhist Research Centre|url=http://research.thanhsiang.org/sites/default/files/attachment/th2018v5.pdf#page=38|title=Origin of Indian Buddhism|first=Ludovic|last=Corsini|pages=35-43|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240825062659/http://research.thanhsiang.org/sites/default/files/attachment/th2018v5.pdf#page=38|archive-date=25 August 2024|url-status=live}}</ref> While Brahminical philosophy placed a strong emphasis on the authority of the Vedas as the sacred text, Sramana scholars questioned this authority severely.{{citation needed |date=December 2024}} They advocated for individual experience, and the direct faithful realizations regardless of worldly or societal hierarchy, over 'blind' faith in scriptures.<ref name=":0" />
==Idol Worship==
{{original research|date=May 2012}}
Western criticism of Hinduism as superstitious idolatry are based on the religious texts of Abrahamic religions which denounce and condemn the practice of creating Idols and Worshiping them.<ref>Nur Jahan, Empress of Mughal India, Ellison Banks Findly - 1993, Page 192 "His main criticism of Hinduism was its idolatry, and his main criticism of idolatry was not a theological abhorrence of giving the unknowable form, but a visual repulsion at the specific form this particular phenomenalization took"</ref><ref>Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and 'the Mystic East' - Page 123 by Richard King - 1999, "Thus, under fervent pressure and criticism from Christian missionaries and increasing interest from Orientalists, one finds an emphasis among the various Hindu 'reform' movements on the repudiation of idolatry (particularly in the cases.."</ref> One of the passages in the Bible that criticize idol worship reads as follow.
{{Quotation|Their idols are silver and gold, The work of the hands of earthling man. A mouth they have, but they cannot speak; Eyes they have, but they cannot see; Ears they have, but they cannot hear. A nose they have, but they cannot smell. Hands are theirs, but they cannot feel. Feet are theirs, but they cannot walk; They utter no sound with their throat. Those making them will become just like them, All those who are trusting in them.- Psalms 115:4-8}}
<ref>], Chapters VIII through XII</ref> Hindu reformist movements in the 18th - 19th centuries such as the ] and ], were highly critical of image worship.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Hindu iconoclasts: Rammohun Roy, Dayananda Sarasvati and nineteenth-century polemics against idolatry|last=Salmond |first=Noel Anthony|authorlink= |coauthors= |year=2004|publisher=Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press|isbn=0-88920-419-5 |page= 65|chapter=3. Dayananda Saraswati|url=http://books.google.com/?id=wxjArixq5hcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Swami+Dayananda+Saraswati&cd=57#v=onepage&q=Swami%20Dayananda%20Saraswati&f=false |ref= }}</ref> The ] ] scholar, ], was the first non-Indian to analyze Hinduism in the context of idol worship while translating the works of Hindu cleric ] from ] to ]. He concluded:
{{Quotation|The Hindus believe with regard to God that he is one, eternal, without beginning and end, acting by free-will, almighty, all-wise, living, giving life, ruling, preserving; one who in his sovereignty is unique, beyond all likeness and unlikeness, and that he does not resemble anything nor does anything resemble.<ref name="fravahr.org">Biruni and the study of non-Islamic Religions by Professor ] at .</ref>}}


Another point of contention was the contrast between ] favored by many Sramanas and the ritualistic approach promoted by Brahminical traditions.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Main Answer Writing Practice |url=https://www.drishtiias.com/mains-practice-question/question-638 |access-date=2024-06-13 |website=Drishti IAS |language=en}}</ref> The Sramanas believed in renunciation and austerity as paths to spiritual liberation, while criticizing excessive ] and attachment to worldly possessions.<ref>Robertson, S., 2003. Periyar EV Ramasami's critique of priestly Hinduism and its implications for social reforms. ''Indian Journal of Theology'', ''45'',
However the truth is, although Vedas describe God as a power beyond imagination, they do not reject Idol Worship. In Puja Vidhaan/Prakriya, there is a host of procedures such as (1).Suchi i.e. cleanliness, use of silks, (2). Muhurat i.e. Auspicious Timing (3).Guru vandanam(4).Symbols such as wearing preferably silks, donning tilak or decoration of the pooja griha and mandir with lights, flowers & rangoli (5). Solemnising the diety - avaahana (invitation), sthaapan (installation) and puja (worship). (3). Use of 'puja dravya' such as ganga jal, akshata, kumkum, turmeric, panchamrita et., (6).Invocation through mantras or dhyanam i.e. silent meditation (7).'kirtans / bhajans' i.e. transcendental experience (7). Gifts to friends & relatives and Charity to the poor. Inter alia, the idol becomes an interface with the God - although He is formless the devotee can conjure the Lord of his definition in all his grandeur, power and divine attributes like karuna and kripa. That 'He' is formless is known to every Hindu but idol worship is the ingredients of Bhakti to enable mortal beings of different to approach and experience Him the one Supreme Being.


https://www.gospelstudies.org.uk/biblicalstudies/pdf/ijt/45_075.pdf</ref> Sramana traditions, such as Jainism, placed a strong emphasis on non-violence (ahimsa), which stood in contrast to certain ].<ref name=":1" />
Christopher John Fuller, professor of anthropology at London School of Economics notes that an image cannot be equated with a deity and the object of worship is the deity whose power is inside the image, and the image is not the object of worship itself. In fact A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada translates the Bhakti Yoga the essence of which was delivered by Lord Krishna in Bhagavad Gita, "Be steadfast in yoga (yoga-sthaḥ), O Arjuna. Perform your duty (kuru karmani) and gain knowledge of the ultimate truth about me and abandon all attachment (sangam) to success or failure (siddhy-asiddhyoḥ). Such evenness of mind (samatvam) is called yoga." This higher level knowledge is since time immemorial. It is well known that Lord Sri Rama, the seventh incarnation of Lord Vishnu, worshipped Lord Shiva at ] - before the war making a 'Saikatha Lingam' to grant him victory and once again after the victory to absolve him any sins that he might have committed during his war against the demon king Ravana in Srilanka.


== Sati ==
Criticism is levelled by those whose understanding of Sanskrit and the full theme of Hindu Ideology is poor and that's the reason many scholars have asserted that the notion carried by Abrahamic religions about Hindu Idol Worship is wrong and misleading.{{cn|date=May 2012}}.
]
{{Main|Sati (practice)|l1=Sati}}


Sati was a historical ] practice, in which a widow sacrifices herself by sitting atop her deceased husband's funeral ].<ref>, Routledge, Ann M. Oberhauser, Jennifer L. Fluri, Risa Whitson, Sharlene Mollett</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gilmartin|first1=Sophie|year=1997|title=The Sati, the Bride, and the Widow: Sacrificial Woman in the Nineteenth Century|journal=Victorian Literature and Culture |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=141–158 | doi =10.1017/S1060150300004678 | jstor =25058378 |s2cid=162954709 | quote =Suttee, or sati, is the obsolete Hindu practice in which a widow burns herself upon her husband's funeral pyre...}}</ref>{{sfn|Sharma|2001|pp=19–21}}<ref name="julialeslie">On attested Rajput practice of sati during wars, see, for example {{cite book|last1=Leslie|first1=Julia|title=Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader|publisher=Routledge|year=1993|isbn=978-0700702848|editor-last=Arnold|editor-first=David|volume=10|location=London|page=46|chapter=Suttee or Sati: Victim or Victor?|editor-last2=Robb|editor-first2=Peter|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vPdYkFguJ8IC&pg=PA46}}</ref> ] states that sati was introduced late into the Indian society, and became regular only after 500 CE.{{sfn|Dehejia|1994|p=50}} The practice became prevalent from 7th century onwards, and declined to its elimination in the 17th century, to then gain resurgence in Bengal in the 18th century.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Nandy|first=Ashis|title=Sati: A Nineteenth Century Tale of Women, Violence and Protest in the book "At the Edge of Psychology"|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1980|pages=1}}</ref> Roshen Dalal postulated that its mention in some of the ] indicates that it slowly grew in prevalence from 5th-7th century and later became an accepted custom around 1000 CE among those of higher classes, especially the ].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DH0vmD8ghdMC&q=sati+shiva+greeks+widow&pg=PA363|last=Dalal |first=Roshen |year=2010 |title=Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide |publisher=Penguin Books India |page=363 |isbn=9780143414216 }}</ref>{{sfn|Yang|2008|p=21–23}}
==Varna System==
{{See also|Varna in Hinduism}}
Caste system is a popularly pracitised system in hinduism however Vedas which are considered to be fountain head of all disciplines never uses the word jati(birth based categorization) rather it uses the word varna (grade/knowledge based categorization) and classifies man on the basis of knowledge. When a baby is born he is considered to be "shudra" lowest level of knowledge but when that baby comes to know the secret of '''"Brahmanda"''' and the Creator '''"Brahman"''' he attains highest level of knowledge i.e. he or that person becomes '''"Brahmin"'''.
Some common examples are:
'''"Aitareya Rishi was son of a Daasa or criminal but became a Brahmin of highest order and wrote Aitareya Brahman and Aitareyopanishad. Aitareya Brahman is considered critical to understand Rigveda."'''''


According to Dehejia, sati originated within the ] (warrior Caste) ], and remained mostly limited to the warrior class among Hindus.{{sfn|Dehejia|1994|p=51-53}} Yang adds that the practice was also emulated by those seeking to achieve high status among the royalty and the warriors.{{sfn|Yang|2008|p=21–23}} The increase of the sati practice may also be related to the centuries of Islamic invasion and its expansion in South Asia.{{sfn|Yang|2008|p=21–23}}<ref name=ssshashi>{{cite book|last=Sashi|first=S.S.|page=115|title=Encyclopaedia Indica: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh|volume=100|year=1996|publisher=Anmol Publications|isbn=9788170418597}}</ref> It acquired an additional meaning as a means to preserve the honour of women whose men had been slain,{{sfn|Yang|2008|p=21–23}} especially with the variant of a mass sati called '']'', practiced especially among the Rajputs as a direct response to the onslaught they had experienced.<ref name="julialeslie" /><ref>{{cite book|title=Social Problems And Welfare In India|year=1992|publisher=Ashish Publishing House|author=Jogan Shankar}}</ref>
'''Ailush Rishi was son of a Daasi, gambler and of low character. However he researched on Rigveda and made several discoveries. Not only was he invited by Rishis but also made an Acharya. (Aitareya Brahman 2.19)'''''
The ] system of ] identified four varnas in ]n society.<ref>Keay, pp. 53-54.</ref> The term ''varna'' is sometimes used synonymously with "caste" or "class"<ref name="Flood, p. 58">Flood, p. 58.</ref> The ] term for ], in the sense of social categories, is ''{{IAST|jāti}}''.<ref name="Flood, p. 58"/><ref>Apte, p. 451.</ref> In historical Indic traditions the varna and caste systems are not the same system, although they are related.<ref>] (2006) The ] Handbook of Global Religions (Oxford Handbooks in Religion and Theology), p. 54</ref> The classical authors scarcely speak of anything other than the varnas. Indologists sometimes confuse the two.<ref name="Chicago">{{Cite book|author=] |title=Homo hierarchicus: the caste system and its implications |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1980 |pages=66–67 |isbn=0-226-16963-4 |postscript=<!--None-->}}</ref> Type (''varna'') obligations were a major concern of the Dharma Sutras and Dharma Shastras, where fulfillment of one's obligation (''dharma'') with regard to class (''varna'') and stage of life (''ashrama'') was a sign of brahmanical orthopraxy.<ref name="Flood, p. 58"/> The four varnas are in descending hierarchical sequence: ], ], ], and ] or the priests, warriors, business people and laborers. There was no varna like untouchable in Hinduism. The untouchables are considered a lower section of ] (]) and was prevalent during the general deterioration of Indian society in middle age. The Varnabahya (outcast) is the one who never lived in cities and thus never became part of the Varna system. Many tribals (]) were Varnabahya. Varnabahya is not to be confused with untouchable. The varna system resulted in a great deal of social oppression and mistreatment of the lowest ranked castes, the Shudras (Dalits). As a result, ] and the implementation of the caste system are often criticized for allowing oppression of people of lower castes, even though the original design of the caste system was not intended to harm or oppress.


The ] (1526–1857) rulers and the Muslim population were ambivalent about the practice,<ref name=annemarie113>{{cite book|author=Annemarie Schimmel|editor=Burzine K. Waghmar|title=The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture|url=https://archive.org/details/empireofgreatmug00anne|url-access=registration|year=2004|publisher=Reaktion|isbn=978-1-86189-185-3|pages=–114}}</ref>{{Sfn|Sharma|2001|p=23}}<ref name=pirbhai108>{{cite book|author=M. Reza Pirbhai|title=Reconsidering Islam in a South Asian Context |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=szKwCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA107 | year=2009| publisher=Brill Academic| isbn=978-90-474-3102-2|page=108}}</ref> with many Mughal emperors forbidding the practice,<ref name=Columbia/> and later the European travelers record that ''sati'' was not much practiced in the Mughal empire.<ref name=Columbia> from ''Muslim Civilization in India'' by S. M. Ikram, edited by Ainslie T. Embree New York: Columbia University Press, 1964</ref> It was notably associated only with elite Hindu ] clans in western ], marking one of the points of divergence between the Hindu Rajputs and the Muslim ]s.<ref name="AsherTalbot2006">{{citation|last1=Asher|first1=Catherine B.|last2=Talbot|first2=Cynthia|title=India before Europe|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GEWAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT268|year=2006|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-91561-8|pages=268–}}</ref>
Hindu religious ], such as the ], suggests that the original varna system was based on a flexible system, where people joined a varna and a related occupation based on their skills, qualities, and nature. However, over time, the varna system transformed into a rigid caste system, preventing the 'lower' classes (also called the 'backward castes') from rising. This caste system has gone beyond Hindus and includes Dalit or lower caste people in other religions like ], ], ], etc. in India, ] and other countries in the ]. Discrimination against classes began as a result of this rigid fixing of the caste system. Also, religious literature suggests that the inclusion of Dalits ('untouchables') outside of the caste system was a later addition, not part of the original system.


With the onset of the British Raj, opposition against sati grew. The principal campaigners against Sati were ] and Hindu reformers such as ] and ].{{sfn|Sharma|2001|pp=6–7}}<ref name="marshman">{{cite book|last=Marshman|first=John Clark|title=History of India from the earliest period to the close of the East India Company's government |publisher= Edinburgh: W. Blackwood |year=1876|page=374|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tbmT_Tv-VGUC&pg=PA357|isbn=9781108021043}}</ref> In 1829, Lord Bentinck issued Regulation XVII, declaring ''Sati'' to be illegal and punishable in criminal courts.<ref>Sharma pp. 7–8.</ref> On 2 February 1830, this law was extended to ] and ].<ref name=hist>{{cite book|last=Rai|first=Raghunath|title=History|page=137|publisher=FK Publications |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z4-8Z0gqBkoC&q=RAM+MOHAN+ROY+SATI+PRACTICE&pg=PA137|isbn=9788187139690}}{{Dead link|date=December 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The ban was challenged by a petition signed by "several thousand... Hindoo inhabitants of Bihar, Bengal, Orissa etc"<ref>Dodwell 1932 p. 141.</ref> and the matter went to the ] in London. Along with British supporters, Ram Mohan Roy presented counter-petitions to parliament in support of ending Sati. The Privy Council rejected the petition in 1832, and the ban on ''Sati'' was upheld.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Kulkarni|first1=A.R.|last2=Feldhaus|first2=Anne|page=192|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1YSU9Qp9w0MC&pg=PA192|title=Images of Women in Maharashtrian Literature and Religion|chapter=Sati in the Maratha Country|publisher=SUNY Press|year=1996|location=Albany, NY|isbn=978-0791428382}}</ref>
Untouchables used to live separately within a separate subcultural context of their own, outside the inhabited limits of villages and townships. No other castes would interfere with their social life since untouchables were lower in social ranking than even those of the shudra varna. As a result, Dalits were commonly banned from fully participating in Hindu religious life (they could not pray with the rest of the social classes or enter the religious establishments).


== Caste system ==
The inclusion of lower castes into the mainstream was argued for by ] who called them "]" (people of God). The term Dalit is used now as the term Harijan is largely felt patronizing. As per Gandhi's wishes, reservation system with percentage quotas for admissions in universities and jobs has been in place for many lower castes since independence of India to bring them to the upper echelons of society. Dalit movements have been created to represent the views of Dalits and combat this traditional ]. Caste-based discrimination is ] in India; ]s to other religions and their descendants frequently preserve such social stratification.<ref name="RG">{{Cite book
<!-- How is the caste-system a defining feature of Hinduism, and not of South Asian society? Criticisms by Buddhists, Bhakti traditions, Islam, British rulers & evangelists, contemporary Dalit activists and international NGO's. -->
| author = Ganguly, Rajat; Phadnis, Urmila
{{Main|Caste system in India}}
| title = Ethnicity and nation-building in South Asia
] describes the caste system as a "discriminatory and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment"<ref name="hidden apartheid"/> of over 165 million people in India. The justification of the discrimination on the basis of ], which according to HRW is "a defining feature of Hinduism,"<ref name="hrw"/> has repeatedly been noticed and described by the United Nations and HRW, along with criticism of other ] worldwide.<ref name="hrw">{{Cite web|title=CASTE DISCRIMINATION|url=https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/globalcaste/caste0801-03.htm|access-date=2021-01-09|website=www.hrw.org}}</ref><ref name="hidden apartheid">{{Cite web|date=2007-02-12|title=Hidden Apartheid|url=https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/02/12/hidden-apartheid/caste-discrimination-against-indias-untouchables|access-date=2021-01-09|website=Human Rights Watch|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=OHCHR {{!}} Caste systems violate human rights and dignity of millions worldwide – New UN expert report|url=https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=18497&LangID=E|access-date=2021-01-09|website=www.ohchr.org}}</ref><ref>"". CBC News. 2 March 2007.</ref>
| publisher = Sage Publications
| location = Thousand Oaks
| year = 2001
| isbn = 0-7619-9439-4
| oclc =
| doi =
| page =88
}}</ref>


==Caste System== ==See also==
* ]
{{off topic|reason=This section contains zero criticism|date=May 2012}}
* ]
{{See also|Caste system in India}}
* ]
The most ancient scriptures—the '']'' texts, or Vedas, place very little importance on the caste system, mentioning caste only rarely and in a cursory manner. A hymn from the ] seems to indicate that one's caste is not necessarily determined by that of one's family:
* ]
* ]


== References ==
{{Quoter|Rig Veda 9.112.3|I am a bard, my father is a physician, my mother's job is to grind the corn.}}
{{reflist|30em}}


==Sources==
In the ], there also seems to no discrimination against the ]s (which later became an ensemble of the so-called low-castes) on the issue of hearing the sacred words of the Vedas and fully participating in all religious rights, something which became totally banned in the later times.<ref>White Yajurveda 26.2</ref>
{{refbegin}}

<!-- D -->
Some scholars believe that, in its initial period, the caste system was flexible and it was merit and job based. One could migrate from one caste to other caste by changing one's profession. This view is supported by records of sages who became Brahmins. For example, the sage ] belonged to a ] caste, and only later became recognized as a great Brahmin sage, indicating that his caste was not determined by birth. Similarly, ], once a low-caste robber, became a great sage. ], another sage, was the son of a fisherwoman.<ref>Sabhlok, Prem. . Page 21.</ref>
* {{Citation | last =Dehejia | first =Vidya | year =1994 | chapter =Comment: A Broader Landscape | editor-last =Hawley | editor-first =John Stratton | title =Sati, the Blessing and the Curse | publisher =Oxford University Press | isbn =978-0195077742}}

<!-- S -->
The ] which is one of the many holy books of Hindus mentions that every living being has a soul which is a part of God and has several references against discrimination between not just humans but even animals. Chapter 5, verse 18 of Bhagawat Gita sums this up by saying that
* {{cite book|last= Sharma|first=Arvind|title=Sati: Historical and Phenomenological Essays|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UJmWgz2mv5oC|year=2001|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-0464-7}}

<!-- Y -->
{{Quoter|Bhagawat Gita 5.18|"The enlightened and wise regards with equal mind a Brahmin endowed with learning and humility, an outcaste, a cow, an elephant, and even a dog".}}
* {{cite book |last1=Yang |first1=Anand A. | year =2008 | chapter =Whose Sati? Widow-Burning in early Nineteenth Century India |editor-last =Sarkar | editor-first =Sumit | editor-last2 =Sarkar | editor-first2 =Tanika |title=Women and Social Reform in Modern India: A Reader |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington, Indiana |isbn=978-0253352699|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GEPYbuzOwcQC&pg=PA21 }}

{{refend}}
The system of four classes incorporated in Righteousness (Dharma) is meant to provide guidance with regard to behaviour and spiritual practice to be undertaken in accordance with qualifications, that is potential and requirement, so as to acquire Bliss.<ref></ref>

When India ] due to the efforts of Hindus like Gandhi, perfect equality was thrust upon the masses of India, no matter to what caste one belonged to, thus reestablishing and continuing the ancient tradition of India.

Untouchability was outlawed after India gained independence in 1947. It will take some time for the deadweight of tradition of the rigid caste system to be removed from India. But as enlightened ] and ], as preached by ], ], ], and others are reaching the masses, slowly these shackles are being dissolved.

] also opposed what he called to the un-Vedic caste system as we know it today. He taught that the caste system originated in a higher age, but became degraded through ignorance and self-interest. Yogananda said:

<blockquote>
"These were (originally) symbolic designations of the stages of spiritual refinement. They were not intended as social categories. And they were not intended to be hereditary. Things changed as the yugas descended toward mental darkness. People in the higher castes wanted to make sure their children were accepted as members of their own caste. Thus, ego-identification caused them to freeze the ancient classifications into what is called the ‘caste system.’ Such was not the original intention. In obvious fact, however, the offspring of a brahmin may be a sudra by nature. And a peasant, sometimes, is a real saint.”
</blockquote>

—from Conversations with Yogananda, Crystal Clarity Publishers, 2003.

==Status of women==
{{Main|Women in Hinduism}}

Women have been given a great importance in ] which is evident from the worship of the Mother Goddess and the depiction of "Artha Nareeshwara". Positive references are made to the ideal woman in texts such as the ] and the ]. Women in vedic period were accorded very high status. The proof can be inferred from reference to thirty women seers contributing to Vedas.

Certain Hindu communities practice ] in which descent is traced through the female more attributed to the evolution of agragrian communities such as ] and ] from the stretch of ] and ] beside ], ]& ] tribes of ] are matrilineal. In such communities, the woman is the family matriarch and has the right to inherit property, and having a female child is considered favorable for a family. The clan system is one in which a woman lives with her brothers and sisters, as well as her mother and cousins.

Several ] sages and seers are mentioned in the Upanishads, the philosophical part of the ], notable among them being ] and ]. The Sanskrit word for female teachers as Acharyā (as opposed to Acharya for teacher and Acharyini for teacher's wife) reveal that women were also given a place as Gurus.

The Harita Dharmasutra (of the Maitrayaniya school of Yayurveda) declares that there are two kind of women: Sadhyavadhu who marry, and the Brahmavaadini who are inclined to religion, they can wear the sacred thread, perform rituals like the agnihotra and read the Vedas. ]'s Uttararamacharita 2.3 says that ] went to Southern India where she studied the Vedas and ]. ] debated with the female philosopher Ubhaya Bharati, and ]'s Shankaradigvijaya (9.63) mentions that she was well versed in the Vedas. ] (15th century) wrote a commentary on ]'s ], with reference to Vedic texts like the Taittiriya Yajurveda.

In the marriage hymn (RV 10.85.26), the wife "should address the assembly as a commander."<ref>] and ], editors, ''The History and Culture of the Indian People''. Volume I: The Vedic age, (Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1951), p.424</ref> A Rig Veda hymn says "I am the banner and the head, a mighty arbitress am I: I am victorious, and my Lord shall be submissive to my will. (Rig Veda, Book 10. HYMN CLIX. Saci Paulomi). These are probably the earliest references to the position of women in Hindu society.

A Hindu housewife is traditionally regarded as "pativrata" i.e. someone who has sworn to be dedicated to her husband as much as the husband has sworn to be dedicated to his wife during the circumabulations around the sacred Agni at the time of wedding.<ref>{{Cite book|author=]|title=Hindu Wife, Hindu Nation: Community, Religion and Cultural Nationalism|location=New Delhi|publisher=Permanent Black|year=2001}}.{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}</ref>. People the world over have regarded a Hindu marriage to be of dedication and the most effective at that.

It is to be noted that ] and ] the extremely courageous queen widows, who interestingly were among the first persons to cross swords with the British Colonialists were exemplary Hidu women. Similarly before them ] was a Queen who quelled thugs, established peace and single handedly achieved the revival of numerous major Hindu religious sites which were lying in shambles ever since the start of Muslim rule. These women are idols and are venerated across India and parents name their children after them.

==Sati==
{{Main|Sati (practice)}}
]
Condemned practices like ] (widow self-immolation or "bride burning") and widow remarriage were social practices that arose in India's Middle Ages, mostly in the northern regions of ]. Whether ] is a practice or a religious law is open for debate. For instance, Brahmin scholars of the second millennium justified the practice, and gave reasonings as to how the scriptures could be said to justify them. Among them were ], of the Chalukya court, and later ], theologian and minister of the court of the Vijayanagara empire, according to Shastri, who quotes their reasoning. It was lauded by them as required conduct in righteous women, and it was explained that this was considered not to be suicide (suicide was otherwise variously banned or discouraged in the scriptures). It was deemed an act of peerless piety, and was said to purge the couple of all accumulated sin, guarantee their salvation and ensure their reunion in the afterlife. See main article on Sati in Misplaced Pages. In the later medieval ages, this practice came to be forced on the widows. However this practice was abolished from the society in the 20th century.

Sati was not prevalent in ancient history. In the epic ], ] (Rama's father) left behind three widows who never committed Sati. In the same epic the wives of Ravana and of other fallen warriors did not commit Sati after the deaths of their husbands. On the other hand, ], in her grief at the death of husband Vali, wished to commit ''sati''. ], ], and the dying Vali dissuade her and she finally does not immolate herself.

In the Mahabharata, ], the mother of ] (Yudhishtira, Arjuna, Bhima) and first wife of ], was a ] who never committed Sati. However, ], second wife of Pandu and the mother of the younger pandavas (] and ]) committed sati out of free-will and left her two sons in the care of Kunti. She was thinking herself responsible for her husband's death. Her husband, Pandu, had been cursed to die the day he ]s for his wife. Earlier in his life, while on a ] expedition, he shot an arrow into a rustling bush. It turned out that he shot a pair of ] that were mating. The surviving deer ] back into human form and revealed itself as a sage. The sage, deeply saddened by his loss and the brazen act of the king, curses him so. In the rest of the ], there are no references to Kaurava wives committing Sati after their husbands died in Mahabharata war.

Passages in the ], including 13.3.1, offer advice to the widow on mourning and her life after widowhood, including her remarriage.

It was during the Islamic invasions into the North-Western Indian Kingdoms during Medieval era that Sati Sahagamana became rampant, in order to avoid the shame and a wretched life of 'paap' as a whore in a ] ] that many women decided to die as faithful wives.<ref>{{Cite book| last = Bhawan| first = Jain| title = Jain journal, Volume 12| publisher = Jain Bhawan.| year = 1977| page = 76| url = http://books.google.com/?id=yb0nAQAAIAAJ&dq=hindu+women+suicide+India+muslim+avoid+shame&q=%22to+avoid+shame+and+dishonour}}</ref>

==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}

==References==
*{{Cite book|series= |last=Apte |first=Vaman Shivram |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary|unused_data= .}}
*{{Cite book|series= |author=]|authorlink= |coauthors= |title=An Introduction to Hinduism|year=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-43878-0 }}
*{{Cite book|series= |author=]|authorlink= |coauthors= |title=India: A History |year=2000 |publisher=Grove Press |location= |isbn=0-8021-3797-0 }}


==External links== ==External links==
*{{Commons category-inline}}
*'''' by ]
*'''' by Ramendra Nath


{{Criticism of religion}} {{Criticism of religion}}
{{Hindudharma}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Criticism Of Hinduism}} ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]

]
]

Latest revision as of 15:06, 11 December 2024

This article is of a series on
Criticism of religion
By religion
By religious figure
By text
Religious violence
Bibliographies
Related topics

Criticism of Hinduism has been applied to both the historical and the current aspects of Hinduism, notably the caste system and the sati practice.

Historical background

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2021)

Early opposition

Some of the earliest criticism of Brahminical texts, including the Vedas and especially the Dharmashastras, come from the Sramana (or renunciate) traditions, including Buddhism and Jainism. Sramana scholars viewed Brahminical philosophy as "heretical". In particular, Sramanas denied the sruti (divine) nature of the Vedas and opposed sacrificial rituals which were at the heart of Brahminical philosophy at the time.

The criticisms of Hinduism and Brahminical philosophy by Sramana scholars occurred primarily during the 6th century BCE to around 8th century CE in ancient India. This period witnessed a flourishing of diverse philosophical schools, including Yoga, Buddhism, Jainism, Ajivikas, and other Sramana traditions that engaged in debates with orthodox Vedic practices.

The Sramanas rejected the rigid social hierarchy enforced by the Brahmins, which placed individuals into fixed social classes from birth. Sramana scholars criticized the emphasis on elaborate rituals and sacrificial practices in Brahminical philosophy. They believed that true spiritual progress could not be achieved through external ceremonies, but rather through internal transformation and self-realization. While Brahminical philosophy placed a strong emphasis on the authority of the Vedas as the sacred text, Sramana scholars questioned this authority severely. They advocated for individual experience, and the direct faithful realizations regardless of worldly or societal hierarchy, over 'blind' faith in scriptures.

Another point of contention was the contrast between ascetic practices favored by many Sramanas and the ritualistic approach promoted by Brahminical traditions. The Sramanas believed in renunciation and austerity as paths to spiritual liberation, while criticizing excessive materialism and attachment to worldly possessions. Sramana traditions, such as Jainism, placed a strong emphasis on non-violence (ahimsa), which stood in contrast to certain Vedic rituals that involved animal sacrifices.

Sati

An 18th-century painting depicting sati
Main article: Sati

Sati was a historical Hindu practice, in which a widow sacrifices herself by sitting atop her deceased husband's funeral pyre. Vidya Dehejia states that sati was introduced late into the Indian society, and became regular only after 500 CE. The practice became prevalent from 7th century onwards, and declined to its elimination in the 17th century, to then gain resurgence in Bengal in the 18th century. Roshen Dalal postulated that its mention in some of the Puranas indicates that it slowly grew in prevalence from 5th-7th century and later became an accepted custom around 1000 CE among those of higher classes, especially the Rajputs.

According to Dehejia, sati originated within the Kshatriyas (warrior Caste) aristocracy, and remained mostly limited to the warrior class among Hindus. Yang adds that the practice was also emulated by those seeking to achieve high status among the royalty and the warriors. The increase of the sati practice may also be related to the centuries of Islamic invasion and its expansion in South Asia. It acquired an additional meaning as a means to preserve the honour of women whose men had been slain, especially with the variant of a mass sati called jauhar, practiced especially among the Rajputs as a direct response to the onslaught they had experienced.

The Mughal Empire (1526–1857) rulers and the Muslim population were ambivalent about the practice, with many Mughal emperors forbidding the practice, and later the European travelers record that sati was not much practiced in the Mughal empire. It was notably associated only with elite Hindu Rajput clans in western India, marking one of the points of divergence between the Hindu Rajputs and the Muslim Mughals.

With the onset of the British Raj, opposition against sati grew. The principal campaigners against Sati were Christian and Hindu reformers such as William Carey and Ram Mohan Roy. In 1829, Lord Bentinck issued Regulation XVII, declaring Sati to be illegal and punishable in criminal courts. On 2 February 1830, this law was extended to Madras and Bombay. The ban was challenged by a petition signed by "several thousand... Hindoo inhabitants of Bihar, Bengal, Orissa etc" and the matter went to the Privy Council in London. Along with British supporters, Ram Mohan Roy presented counter-petitions to parliament in support of ending Sati. The Privy Council rejected the petition in 1832, and the ban on Sati was upheld.

Caste system

Main article: Caste system in India

Human Rights Watch describes the caste system as a "discriminatory and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment" of over 165 million people in India. The justification of the discrimination on the basis of caste, which according to HRW is "a defining feature of Hinduism," has repeatedly been noticed and described by the United Nations and HRW, along with criticism of other caste systems worldwide.

See also

References

  1. Thapar, Romila (1989). "Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modern Search for a Hindu Identity". Modern Asian Studies. 23 (2): 209–231. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00001049. ISSN 0026-749X. JSTOR 312738. S2CID 145293468.
  2. "Quick Revision Module (UPSC Prelims 2024) Art & Culture Religion & Philosophy-1" (PDF). Vision IAS. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2024.
  3. ^ Johri, Arushi. "Brahminic and Shramanic Traditions in Ancient India".
  4. ^ Corsini, Ludovic (2018). "Origin of Indian Buddhism" (PDF). Than Hsiang Buddhist Research e-Journal. 5 (Special ed.). Than Hsiang Buddhist Research Centre: 35–43. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 August 2024.
  5. "Main Answer Writing Practice". Drishti IAS. Retrieved 2024-06-13.
  6. Robertson, S., 2003. Periyar EV Ramasami's critique of priestly Hinduism and its implications for social reforms. Indian Journal of Theology, 45, https://www.gospelstudies.org.uk/biblicalstudies/pdf/ijt/45_075.pdf
  7. Feminist Spaces: Gender and Geography in a Global Context, Routledge, Ann M. Oberhauser, Jennifer L. Fluri, Risa Whitson, Sharlene Mollett
  8. Gilmartin, Sophie (1997). "The Sati, the Bride, and the Widow: Sacrificial Woman in the Nineteenth Century". Victorian Literature and Culture. 25 (1): 141–158. doi:10.1017/S1060150300004678. JSTOR 25058378. S2CID 162954709. Suttee, or sati, is the obsolete Hindu practice in which a widow burns herself upon her husband's funeral pyre...
  9. Sharma 2001, pp. 19–21.
  10. ^ On attested Rajput practice of sati during wars, see, for example Leslie, Julia (1993). "Suttee or Sati: Victim or Victor?". In Arnold, David; Robb, Peter (eds.). Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader. Vol. 10. London: Routledge. p. 46. ISBN 978-0700702848.
  11. Dehejia 1994, p. 50.
  12. Nandy, Ashis (1980). Sati: A Nineteenth Century Tale of Women, Violence and Protest in the book "At the Edge of Psychology". Oxford University Press. p. 1.
  13. Dalal, Roshen (2010). Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide. Penguin Books India. p. 363. ISBN 9780143414216.
  14. ^ Yang 2008, p. 21–23.
  15. Dehejia 1994, p. 51-53.
  16. Sashi, S.S. (1996). Encyclopaedia Indica: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh. Vol. 100. Anmol Publications. p. 115. ISBN 9788170418597.
  17. Jogan Shankar (1992). Social Problems And Welfare In India. Ashish Publishing House.
  18. Annemarie Schimmel (2004). Burzine K. Waghmar (ed.). The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture. Reaktion. pp. 113–114. ISBN 978-1-86189-185-3.
  19. Sharma 2001, p. 23.
  20. M. Reza Pirbhai (2009). Reconsidering Islam in a South Asian Context. Brill Academic. p. 108. ISBN 978-90-474-3102-2.
  21. ^ XVII. "Economic and Social Developments under the Mughals" from Muslim Civilization in India by S. M. Ikram, edited by Ainslie T. Embree New York: Columbia University Press, 1964
  22. Asher, Catherine B.; Talbot, Cynthia (2006), India before Europe, Cambridge University Press, pp. 268–, ISBN 978-1-139-91561-8
  23. Sharma 2001, pp. 6–7.
  24. Marshman, John Clark (1876). History of India from the earliest period to the close of the East India Company's government. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood. p. 374. ISBN 9781108021043.
  25. Sharma pp. 7–8.
  26. Rai, Raghunath. History. FK Publications. p. 137. ISBN 9788187139690.
  27. Dodwell 1932 p. 141.
  28. Kulkarni, A.R.; Feldhaus, Anne (1996). "Sati in the Maratha Country". Images of Women in Maharashtrian Literature and Religion. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0791428382.
  29. ^ "Hidden Apartheid". Human Rights Watch. 2007-02-12. Retrieved 2021-01-09.
  30. ^ "CASTE DISCRIMINATION". www.hrw.org. Retrieved 2021-01-09.
  31. "OHCHR | Caste systems violate human rights and dignity of millions worldwide – New UN expert report". www.ohchr.org. Retrieved 2021-01-09.
  32. "UN report slams India for caste discrimination". CBC News. 2 March 2007.

Sources

External links

Criticism of religion
By religion
Religious texts
Religious figures
Religious discrimination
Religious violence
Books
Movements
  • Agnosticism
  • Antitheism
  • Atheism
  • Cārvāka
  • New Atheism
  • Nontheistic religions
  • Parody religion
  • Related topics
    Hinduism topics
    Philosophy
    Concepts
    Schools
    Hindu "Om" symbol
    Texts
    Classification
    Vedas
    Divisions
    Upanishads
    Upavedas
    Vedanga
    Other
    Sangam literature
    Deities
    Gods
    Goddesses
    Practices
    Worship
    Sanskaras
    Varnashrama
    Festivals
    Other
    Related
    Outline
    Categories: