Misplaced Pages

Talk:Linux/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Linux Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:45, 1 May 2006 edit69.171.41.253 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:12, 18 November 2009 edit undoW4otn (talk | contribs)216 edits Added information on the 2001 Red Hat study. 
(35 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* fix references, inline citations * update references for adoption to match recent events
* talk more about international usage
* rephrase parts which are overly technical (mostly done)
* finish translating missing content from French page: servers, embedded devices, and security
* give the second half of the article some direction and serious loving
* change "monolithic" to "modular" in the first right column * talk about X and possibly TeX in the history section
* add better references
* reference for all the different pronunciations
* expand comparisons section, mention device drivers here
* move the remaining stuff near the end about uptake/adoption/migration/usage to ] and summarize in History
* improve the criticism section. Criticism of Linux has mysteriously disappeared over time. (Compare the current article to the "article milestones" listed on this page. Also see the revision history of ].)
* <strike>Verify the "Copyright and naming" section states "A 2001 study of Red Hat Linux 7.1" and I am pretty sure were only at Red Hat 5 to date.</strike> Confirmed. BTW, we are at Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5.4, today. RHEL and Red Hat Linux are different. --] (]) 19:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:12, 18 November 2009

  • update references for adoption to match recent events
  • talk more about international usage
  • finish translating missing content from French page: servers, embedded devices, and security
  • talk about X and possibly TeX in the history section
  • add better references
  • reference for all the different pronunciations
  • expand comparisons section, mention device drivers here
  • move the remaining stuff near the end about uptake/adoption/migration/usage to Linux adoption and summarize in History
  • improve the criticism section. Criticism of Linux has mysteriously disappeared over time. (Compare the current article to the "article milestones" listed on this page. Also see the revision history of Criticism of Linux.)
  • Verify the "Copyright and naming" section states "A 2001 study of Red Hat Linux 7.1" and I am pretty sure were only at Red Hat 5 to date. Confirmed. BTW, we are at Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5.4, today. RHEL and Red Hat Linux are different. --W4otn (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)