Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:15, 30 August 2012 view sourceJethro B (talk | contribs)Rollbackers9,518 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:16, 9 January 2025 view source Femke (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators20,976 edits User:Pseud 14: done (using userRightsManager)Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Requests for permissions}}{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}} <noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request autopatrolled rights}}{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude>
===Autopatrolled<span id="rperm-autopatrolled"></span>===
{{noadminbacklog}}</noinclude>
{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=A|subpage=Autopatrolled|notice=<noinclude>
Please read ''']''' before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created ''at least'' '''{{Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled/Article count}} new articles''' on the English Misplaced Pages, excluding ] and ]. These articles should be free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Note that this right '''will not help you create or patrol articles'''.</noinclude>}}
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks. -->


====]====
==={{anchor|rperm-autopatrolled}}Autopatrolled===
*{{rfplinks|1=Aidillia}}
:;(<span class="plainlinks"> &#8226; ]</span>)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
<noinclude>{{TOCright}}
{{shortcuts|WP:PERM/A|WP:RFP/A}}
]
]
]
]</noinclude>
<!-- Please do not edit the section above. Thanks. -->


Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created ]! :) <span style="font-family:Cursive">]<sup>(])</sup></span> 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
====]====
*<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · · · · · {{plainlink|1={{fullurl:Special:Log|user=StringTheory11}} logs}} · · · ) · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ]) (]) (<sup><small> · · · c</sup></small>)</span></span>
:I would like to ease the burden on new page patrollers when I create articles. I have started many articles on notable stars, and plan to start many more; you can see which ones I plan to start on my userpage. To let people know, I also currently have rollback rights. Thank you. ] (] • ]) 21:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


:{{non-admin comment}} In '']'', there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was ] but later ] and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until ] fixed and ]. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Misplaced Pages is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
{{rfp|Activism1234|I haven't created 50 articles - although I have created many - but I know of other editors who told me they got AutoReview rights while they had less than 50 articles. You can check my edit history, the pages I create are good and properly referenced and contain a lot of information. Right now, I'm working on creating articles for every member of the Egyptian cabinet - I've already started a few, and created ]. Having autoreview rights would significantly ease the process for other editors of checking articles.}} <small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']]'''</small> 21:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
:It also appears to be that ] had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. ] (]) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:*{{nao}} User has created 13 articles. <font face="Comic Sans MS">]&nbsp;(] • ])</font> 21:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
::Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. <span style="font-family:Cursive">]<sup>(])</sup></span> 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::*I know that, and understand if I'm not granted the rights, but I explained that above. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']]'''</small> 21:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Pseud 14}}
Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. <span class="nowrap">—]</span> <small>(])</small> 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} ] (]) 19:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Cmacauley}}
Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. ] (]) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Anon423}}
I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. —&hairsp;] (]) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=SiniyaEdita}}
Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed ] and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. ] (]) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Ojsyork}}
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. ] (]) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:16, 9 January 2025

Place to request autopatrolled rights
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please read Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created at least 25 new articles on the English Misplaced Pages, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. These articles should be free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

User:Aidillia

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Misplaced Pages is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Pseud 14

Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Cmacauley

Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Anon423

I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. — Anon423 (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SiniyaEdita

Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ojsyork

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Category: