| Revision as of 09:12, 16 September 2012 editLone boatman (talk | contribs)3,013 edits General note: Removal of content, blanking on Reca. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:24, 15 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==]== | |||
| ==June 2012== | |||
| Hi. I've opened a GAR on the ] article for which you are one of the top ten contributors. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding several MoS issues, see ] for more details. ''']''' ''']''' 10:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Watch them ] on ]. Seems not to be clear vandalism, so the "bright line" rule probably applies here. I warned Bozo1789, so I probably should send you a note too. Cheers ] (]) 09:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <span class="nowrap"><font color="blue">Canuck</font><small><sup><font color="maroon">89</font> ]</small></sup> <!--<small>{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>User:Canuckian89/Time2}}</small>--></span> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692071653 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 days''' for edit warring on multiple articles. You say that "Bozo1789 is an obvious sockpuppet of User:Iaaasi", but you have, as far as I can see, presented no evidence to support that statement. If it is "obvious" then it should not be difficult to provide evidence. You may like to take the case to ] when your block ends. (You could have taken it there already, if you had not chosen to edit war.) Considering your history of numerous blocks for edit warring and personal attacks, a three day block seems minimal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 10:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=What I did does not fall under ] per ] ''"Anyone is free to revert any edits made in defiance of a ban"''. Furthermore, I correctly noted in edit summaries that my reverts were made under WP BAN. Said user did not even deny that he is a sockpuppet of Iaaasi.For more information see: Also, said site-banned user continued to edit Misplaced Pages even after his recent throw away account is blocked. See:-> | decline=As per JBW below. Mere ''assertion'' does not cut it, and you already know that (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 10:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> -- <b>] <sup>]</sup> </b> 03:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| *You may or may not be right about the sockpuppetry, but, even if you are right: | |||
| #Merely asserting that the account is a sockpuppet, without evidence, is dubious justification. You said that it was an "obvious" sockpuppet, in which case it should have been easy to justify your claim. | |||
| #If you really did have enough evidence of sockpuppetry, then you should have reported the fact. Edit warring on such a massive scale as you did without making any attempt at all to get the sockpuppetry issue issue dealt with was not the most constructive way forward. You clearly have far more than enough experience to be able to find your way to either ] or a relevant administrators' noticeboard. (And, as far as "on such a massive scale as you did" is concerned, I don't believe I have ever come across a case with ''anywhere near'' so much edit warring in so short a period of time.) | |||
| #Some of your reverts restored nonsense, which is not justifiable, no matter what. ] (]) 10:34, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=I keep reporting his sockpuppets in vain. But when one of his sockpuppet is blocked, one another is created. Furthermore, I keep beseeching for a Ip rang block for Iaaasi, but the administrators has failed to give one. Therefore, the only way to be stopped Iaaasi is to be reverted every contribution that he makes to the project that does not fall under ] following the instructions pursuant to]. And considering that Iaaasi has created almost 100 sockpuppets for now it falls under ]. Also, said user did not even deny that he is a sockpuppet of Iaaas, see:.--] (]) 10:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | decline=I am now the third administrator to tell you that nothing you have listed in your unblock requests exempts you from edit warring. --] ] 11:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| === Conditional unblock request === | |||
| I am willing to offer you an unblock with the following terms. Note that the following unblock offer does not find the original block to have been made inappropriately or on false grounds; it is merely a courtesy to allow you to prove your allegations. | |||
| # You are unblocked immediately to file an SPI case on the user ] to prove your allegations. | |||
| # For the next 72 hours after the acceptance of this unblock (i.e. time equivalent to the original block length), you are ''only'' allowed to edit your own user talk page, ], ] and the subpages of those respective pages. You may not edit any other pages under any circumstances, with no exceptions. | |||
| # If you are found in violation of the above term, any administrator may immediately reblock with a minimum duration of two weeks, but possibly more depending on how you violated the terms. | |||
| # You may not remove this message until 72 hours after your acceptance message (i.e. when the terms of the conditional unblock have expired). | |||
| If you wish to agree to these terms, state "I agree" below, and sign your message. --] ] 11:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :It is okay with me if i am also allowd to edit ] ,too, to be possible to prove my assertion.--] (]) 11:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Then you have not agreed to the terms of the unblock, and will not be unblocked. --] ] 11:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| O.K.--] (]) | |||
| :If you agree, please state "I agree to your terms". You need to be explicit about it. --] ] 11:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Agree.--] (]) 11:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| *''(Several edit conflicts...)'' I see that I was mistaken in thinking that you had not filed a sockpuppet investigation report, so I have reduced the length of the block to 31 hours. My apologies for the mistake. However, you provided no evidence beyond similarity of usernames, which is not enough to establish sockpuppetry, and certainly nowhere near enough to justify the actions you took. I suggest that Deskana amend the above offer to read "31 hours" instead of "72 hours", but otherwise the offer seems to me to be reasonable. ] (]) 11:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I agree to your terms, Deskana, but I have no longer time to edit Misplaced Pages today, so I can return to the issue tomorrow.--] (]) 11:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have unblocked you. Please be careful to not violate the terms, as if you do violate them you will simply be blocked immediately without warning. --] ] 11:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::: As I see has been blocked indefinitely on the grounds that he was a sockpuppet of ]. Is there any point in explaining my position and the terms still apply to me?--] (]) 07:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Given that, and given that the adjusted block JamesBWatson has placed would've expired by now if I hadn't unblocked you, we can consider the above terms to have ended. You're free to edit. Bear in mind though, the exact same thing will happen in future if you don't actually prove that an account is a sockpuppet before you go on a reverting spree. --] ] 20:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| *<s>While policy allows reverting of any edit by a banned user, it makes sense to apply a little common sense. For example, it is pretty pointless to revert a change from "an year" to "a year", as you did . Such editing really is disruptive.</s> ] (]) 10:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I withdraw that comment. I have now seen much more of how Iaaasi blatantly and openly takes the line "never mind about my ban, as long as some of my editing is likely to stick, I will carry on doing it", and I am now of the opinion that the advantage of conveying the message "your editing will not stick" outweighs any disadvantage caused by reverting some edits which might be helpful. ] (]) 20:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Hi Nmate, thanks for notifying EdJohnston about that disruptive editor. ] ] 05:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Novi Sad and Zrenjanin== | |||
| My behavior is good and in equivalence with the wiki rules. Someone come and vandalism the articles, ignore the facts of 2012 and the rubrics and make propaganda. Look again.--] (]) 12:56, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Of course, this user try to put this unofficial name since a long time. The name is not the official name. First, the other names of the city are enumerated in the RUBRIC - NAME ok. Second, in Novi Sad ect. is the Serbian population the absolute majority and only one name will mentioned in this case in the introduction, the rest in the rubric NAME.--] (]) 13:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| He don t stop to revert. Its ever the same person, sometimes he change the IP, but is ever the same person with propaganda goals. I write and he reverted. I do not revert anymore. But he continue to revert. Its not my fault if he ever revert me (only he).--] (]) 13:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for the information.--] (]) 15:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re:Magyar Nemzeti Tanács== | |||
| You are right, I'm sorry. Othewrwise I congratulate you for having greatly expanded the article of ]. --] (]) 08:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of Biographies of living persons noticeboard discussion== | |||
| Hello, Nmate. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:Csanád Szegedi|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:Csanád Szegedi|The discussion is about the topic ].}}<!--Template:BLPN-notice--> Thank you. --] (]) 14:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2012 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from ]. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel1 --> Best regards, <font color="navy" face="Tahoma">]</font><font color="purple" face="Courier">(])</font> 08:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel2 --> Best regards, <font color="navy" face="Tahoma">]</font><font color="purple" face="Courier">(])</font> 08:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered ]. Further edits of this type may result in your account being ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> Best regards, <font color="navy" face="Tahoma">]</font><font color="purple" face="Courier">(])</font> 09:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for August 25== | |||
| Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == '''The Olive Branch''': A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) == | |||
| Welcome to the first edition of ''The Olive Branch''. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in ] (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are ], but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to ]. | |||
| ] | |||
| In this issue: | |||
| * '''Background''': A brief overview of the DR ecosystem. | |||
| * '''Research''': The most recent DR data | |||
| * '''Survey results''': Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey | |||
| * '''Activity analysis''': Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums | |||
| * '''DR Noticeboard comparison''': How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August | |||
| * '''Discussion update''': Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate | |||
| * '''Proposal''': It's time to close the ]. Agree or disagree? | |||
| <big><center>]</center></big> | |||
| --''The Olive Branch'' 19:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0345 --> | |||
| Valamit kellene csinálni a cikk miatt, csak én nem ismerek itt semmilyen adminisztrátort. Valaki olyan kellene talán, aki magyar és levédené a győri csata cikkét, hogy ezek a hülyeségek ne érjék és ne töltődjön teli a laptörténet. ] (]) 15:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Látom tettél javaslatot, köszi. Bár ha ez megtörténik, az utolsó két anonos szerkesztést vissza lehetne még állítani. Viszont ne most azonnal, mert akkor megint szerkháború lesz. ] (]) 16:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Most megint egy román avatkozik be a dologba és jön külföldi történészekkel, akik csak osztrák seregről írnak. Azok a történészek nem is ismerik a csata körülményeit. ] (]) 17:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for September 14== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2012 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ] without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an ]. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 09:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:24, 15 February 2023
Talk:Banská Bystrica/GA1
Hi. I've opened a GAR on the Banská Bystrica article for which you are one of the top ten contributors. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding several MoS issues, see Talk:Banská Bystrica/GA1 for more details. SilkTork 10:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Vök for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vök is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vök until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Dane 03:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)