Revision as of 01:31, 18 September 2012 editMathewTownsend (talk | contribs)14,937 edits →Some sources on Indian cinema: reply to Dwaipayanc← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:58, 27 March 2024 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers383,166 edits Undid revision 1215891493 by Andrybak (talk) not permitted to be aroundTag: Undo | ||
(380 intermediate revisions by 78 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{sockpuppet|Mattisse|confirmed}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
|counter = 6 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 10 | |||
|algo = old(14d) | |||
|archive = User talk:MathewTownsend/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{User:SuggestBot/config | |||
|frequency = twice a month | |||
|replace | |||
}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
'''Welcome!''' | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
Hello, MathewTownsend, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] and ] | |||
*] (using the ] if you wish) | |||
*] | |||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{help me}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
] ] 19:07, 18 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes}} | |||
Please help to establish notability of the minister from Nigeria you just posted. Just being a minister from Nigeria does not mean the subject is notable. Please review notability guidelines, and then write examples into the article with inline sourcing to external and reliable sources. | |||
Happy editing ] (]) 20:19, 18 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Ok for ]. ] (]) 23:55, 25 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
== AFT5 newsletter == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
Hey again all :). So, some big news, some small news, some good news, some bad news! | |||
On the "big news" front; we've now deployed AFT5 on to 10 percent of articles, This is pretty awesome :). On the "bad news", however, it looks like we're having to stop at 10 percent until around September - there are scaling issues that make it dangerous to deploy wider. Happily, our awesome features engineering team is looking into them as we speak, and I'm optimistic that the issues will be resolved. | |||
For both "small" and "good" news; we've got another ] session. This one is tomorrow, at in {{channel|wikimedia-office}} - I appreciate it's a bit late for Europeans, but I wanted to juggle it so US east coasters could attend if they wanted :). Hope to see you all there! | |||
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == | |||
] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! | |||
{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
|- | |||
|valign=top| | |||
;Stubs:<!--''']:'''--> | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
|align=top| | |||
;Cleanup | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Merge | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Add sources | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Wikify | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Expand | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
|} | |||
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping! | |||
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on ]. Regards from ] (]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- ] (]) 00:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Article History == | |||
{{Talkback|Sainsf|ts = ] <font color="violet"><^></font><sub>]</sub> 13:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Clarified about what Article History is. --] <font color="violet"><^></font><sub>]</sub> 13:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi, Mathew. There's no rush, but I thought I should let you know I have addressed the concerns raised in the GA review and am ready for the next step. Thanks for taking the time to review this article. -- ] (]) 16:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Please comment on ] == | |||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 17:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ''The Signpost'': 03 September 2012 == | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2012-09-03}} | |||
</div><!--Volume 8, Issue 36--> | |||
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
* ''']''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (]) 11:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0343 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
I've reworked the article a bit, and I went and nominated it for GA. I'm starting to feel like it's in Ok shape, any thoughts? ] (]) 00:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I'll take a look! When researching the topic (before my comment to you on your page), I saw there is a fair amount of coverage and that it is a legitimate topic. ] (]) 00:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::On a somewhat related issue, tells quite an interesting story. ] (]) 01:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::unfortunately an all too common story, not just with meth, but with schizophrenia etc. ] (]) 15:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Yeah, it's really a shame, quite sad. ] (]) 16:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ''The Tea Leaf'' - Issue Six == | |||
Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of ''The Tea Leaf'', the official newsletter of the ]! | |||
*'''Teahouse serves over 700 new editors in six months''' on Misplaced Pages! Since February 27, 741 new editors have participated at the Teahouse. The Q&A board and the guest intro pages are more active than ever. | |||
]]] | |||
*'''Automatic invites are doing the trick: 50% more new editors visiting each week.''' Ever since ]'s automated invite ] began we've seen a boost in new editor participation. Automating a baseline set of invitations also allows Teahouse hosts to focus on serving hot cups of help to guests, instead of spending countless hours inviting. | |||
*'''Guests to the Teahouse continue to edit more & interact more with other community members than non-Teahouse guests''' according to ]. Teahouse guests make more than twice the article edits and edit more talk pages than other new editors. | |||
*'''New host process implemented''' which encourages anyone to get started as a Teahouse host in a few easy steps. Stop by the ] page and become a Teahouse host today! | |||
*'''Host lounge renovations nearing completion.''' Working closely with Teahouse hosts, we've made some major renovations to the ] - the main hangout and resource space for hosts. Learn more about the improvements ]. | |||
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and ] us today! | |||
<small>You are receiving ''The Tea Leaf'' after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username ]. ] (]) 00:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0346 --> | |||
== Please comment on ] == | |||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 18:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== You've got mail! == | |||
{{you've got mail|subject=|ts=23:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
] (]) 23:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:hay, thanks for the sources! Been a little busy lately but will read, digest, and help out! ] (]) 13:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
If you can't read an 'in use' tag when you see one, I'll let you save me the work then ;) I just thought that with me being bilingual I could translate it as fast as I type. ] (]) 15:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:ok, I'm sorry. It wasn't there when I started editing the page. Go ahead. Best, ] (]) 15:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:. I'll let you get on with it, the original is . ] (]) 15:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Sorry. It wasn't there when I opened the page, but then I spend some time looking for sources, so in that time the "in use" was probably put up. Since I didn't refresh the page, I didn't see it. Again, I'm very sorry. Best, ] (]) 15:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::p.s. I was translating the original, so I already knew where it was. That's what I was doing, plus rewriting it and cleaning it up. ] (]) 15:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::No worries. In any case, the creator appears to already have a translation that he was working on inserting. The problem was caused by a newbie 58-edit patroller who tagged the article CSD within 5 minutes. I've now asked him to stop patrolling pages until he has learned how to do it. I'll drop a note on the creator's page to let him know he can proceed with his translation now that I saved it from deletion. ] (]) 15:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Thank you, both of you, for taking such good care. It's true I had a translation, and was discouraged when it was deleted so fast. So thank you for letting me know. Today is an European meeting of BETH, and I want to show the Misplaced Pages pages] (]) 06:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Surfeit of Pyramids == | |||
Just noticed at GAN that you are planning to review Pyramid of Sahure. The same editor nominated ] and as you can see from ] they have now gone on a break for an unspecified period. I am not quite sure what to make of this. English is not this individual's first language, but a possible implication is that they are expecting me to fail it - which I fear I may have to do if they do not return soon. Thought you'd appreciate knowing about this before you spend time on Sahure. ] ]] 19:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you very much! I've been hesitating completing the ] review because I can't verify that it's original work. The writing is unusually sophisticated, and especially so if English is not his first language. So, thanks again! I'll have to figure out what to do. ] (]) 20:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to review a GA candidate == | |||
Matthew, hope you're doing well. I was wondering if you might have time to check out ], which is currently a GA nominee. The initial reviewing editor seems to be missing in action. Let me know if you're interested. ] (]) 22:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
hey, Homunculus, I'll consider it. It's an interesting article. Right now I'm exhausted and about to collapse. Forgive me. ] (]) 22:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:No worries. Enjoy the weekend. I could ask someone else, if you've got too much on your plate. ] (]) 13:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Sorry! == | |||
Hey, Mathew, sorry for reverting you! It was a misclick. You'd think I would've learned not to check my watchlist on a touchscreen, but apparently not... again, sorry! ] ]] 22:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:hey, that's ok. I'm not fussed! ] (]) 23:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Editor adding original research, poorly-sourced and/or irrelevant material to the ] article == | |||
Mathew, care to weigh in at ]? | |||
This is definitely one of those times where I require your help. ] (]) 02:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:As you can see, it was resolved. So no worries. ] (]) 14:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== This == | |||
When an image passes flickr review, panoramio review, picasa review at Wikimedia Commons or has a license template that was created by an Administrator at Wikimedia Commons, <u>it is considered passed for life</u> as long as the person who took the images is the real author. I have stated above that the Egypt Archive images were copyright free at upload...and I didn't create the copyright free license template although I am trusted at Wikicommons to pass or fail images at Wikimedia Commons. A web site may go offline in the future--and people routinely delete images on flickr, panoramio and picasa that they licensed freely and notice have now passed flickr/panoramio/picasa review on a copyright free license on Wikimedia Commons--but as long as the owner of the images owns the rights, they cannot revoke permission for the use of their images on wikicommons--and therefore[REDACTED] or other web sites such as a newspaper web site, etc. | |||
That being said Crisco's comments about the GA sound reasonable. Best Regards, --] (]) 09:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Drive Award == | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Order of the Superior Scribe of Misplaced Pages '''<!-- {{subst:Superior|message ~~~~ }} --> | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your recognition for 72 GA reviews at the last June-July GAN Review Round. Regards. — ] (]) 15:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:NB: well-deserved! ] (]) 10:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Please comment on ] == | |||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 19:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== '']'' == | |||
Hey Mathew! I'm still waiting for the answers to the Test 3, although you told me you've been busy; it's okay, i can wait :) On another business, I have nominated the article above, ''System Shock 2'' at FAC and would like to know if you can give me a hand at polishing a bit the prose. The article seems to be in pretty good shape but it may still need some tweaks and all help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. — ]] 04:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I'll try though I'm not good at editing video articles. Also, I will answer Test 3 - just been really busy and tired. But will do. ] (]) 17:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Page Curation update == | |||
Hey all :). We've just deployed another set of features for Page Curation. They include flyouts from the icons in ], showing who reviewed an article and when, a listing of this in the "info" flyout, and a general re-jigging of the info flyout - we've also fixed the weird bug with page_titles_having_underscores_instead_of_spaces in messages sent to talkpages, and introduced ! As always, these features will need some work - but any feedback would be ]. | |||
== ''The Signpost'': 10 September 2012 == | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2012-09-10}} | |||
</div><!--Volume 8, Issue 37--> | |||
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
* ''']''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (]) 05:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0352 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi, please see: | |||
* ] | |||
The "review" at ] is lame; any article deserves better. I think the thing to do here is simply discard that review. You review a lot of GANs so I thought you might want to do a proper job of this one. Prolly best to wait for a few a few comments on the WTGAN page, but if that page is slow, then there's always WPBOLD. note; I also suggested as much to Malleus, so... ] (]) 11:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:sorry to answer so late. Been really busy. Will wait as you say and take a look at the article. Looks like the GA1 has been deleted. See if I can clear my plate - kinda tired lately. ] (]) 22:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Notice of Dispute resolution discussion == | |||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 18:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I had to manually fill it out, so the request may be messed up. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 19:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Please comment on ] == | |||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 20:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== '']'' == | |||
Hey Mathew! I just finished work on this article and—after System Shock 2 goes out of FAC—i will take it to FAC. So, I would like to ask you to take a look and give some copyedits to it if you can. I'd like it to pass at the first nom :) Thanks! — ]] 21:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Oh i saw you worte above you were busy and tired. I'm not hurried. You can take all the time you need :) — ]] 21:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::ok, i will. ] (]) 22:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
*I saw some of your comments over the past day, sorry to see that you're discouraged. A lot of people here just want to assert dominance over others. Br'er can explain it lord of the flies stuff better than me, but at times this places has a lot of bullies who want to make themselves feel important. ] (]) 18:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:Such as administrators do you mean? ] ] 18:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::It's an unpleasant reality that many admins here are bullies, yes. Hopefully I am not one of them (admin bullies), but . ] (]) 18:27, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:::Just for the sake of clarity, I don't regard you as one of the bullying admins, but there are certainly too many of them. ] ] 21:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks, I'm glad to hear that. I'll try my best to keep it that way. ] (]) 22:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks == | |||
Thanks for telling me that. No, I didn't. I fixed it.--] (]) 23:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== A bowl of strawberries for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hey Mathew; sorry to read that you're feeling a bit tired / down / overwhelmed / whatever. A nice bowl of fresh fruit certainly can't hurt ;P And a Granny Hug, of course, to go with it. ] (]) 01:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
Thanks PeskyCommoner. Tis true and and I appreciate your message and most of all that you noticed and responded. It does help to receive your messages at times like these. True thanks! ] (]) 02:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation for discussion == | |||
I invite you to discuss about a threatening message recieved from a registered user saying I have commited copyright violation and reverted his undo on my contribution twice. | |||
Infact i would tell you to do thorough research on how it became a copy and paste as i had done the work myself from the external written material resources not cyber and it took 5 days,discussing with users like ,not to disgust anyone but frankly saying is a waste of time and completely useless.you can point out extracts of what is written to show copyright similarities if you like. | |||
otherwise if u dont have time leave a yes or no comment on my talk page. --] (]) 05:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC) or leave it completely--] (]) 05:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Please keep an eye on behaviour and asess him and his blocking policy if u dont mind--] (]) 05:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Please comment on ] == | |||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 05:14, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Test 3 == | |||
('''EDIT''': The bot archived the test. I unarchived it so that you can answer the questions when you have the time.) | |||
Here is your third test; enjoy. | |||
#Why should new users be given level 1 warnings when possible? | |||
#:] should be assumed. The edit may be a test edit, an accident, or mistakes made through a lack of knowledge of how to edit wikipedia. New users need to be educated and encouraged to make helpful contributions. Also, a polite and informative warning may dissuade a vandalizing editor from making more vandal edits. | |||
#What level(s), if vandalism persists after the warning, can cause a user be reported to AIV and blocked for disruptive editing for vandalizing above this warning(s)? | |||
#:After the first warning, three more warnings of increasing sternness for additional vandal edits are issued, the level four one being a "final" warning that the user may be blocked without further warning if such edits continue. Any vandal edits after that can cause the user to be reported to AIV. | |||
#What level warning(s) mention that an editor could be blocked? | |||
#:Level three warns that "further disruptive editing or vandalism may lead to a block." | |||
#A new user blanking sections. | |||
#:Since blanking or removing part of an article's content (especially of a BLP) may be done in good faith, {{t|uw-test1}} or {{t|uw-delete1}} should be used if examination of the removed content determines the removal was unwarranted. | |||
#Nonsense/Repeating characters. | |||
#:Adding nonsense or repeating characters is considered "silly vandalism" and ]. Care must be taken not to ], as such edits may be inadvertent. Users should be warned by using a series of {{t|uw-test}} or {{t|uw-vandalism}} warning templates and reported as vandals if they continue. | |||
#Replacing an article with obscenities. | |||
#:This is considered vandalism and the series of {{t|uw-vandalism}} should be used. | |||
#How should vandalism be reverted (without Rollback)? | |||
#:The "undo" button can be used and the edit can be marked as minor. The article history can be examined for additional vandalism. | |||
#Should section blanking-edits be reverted? | |||
#:Not automatically, unless the reverting editor is extremely familiar with the article, is following it closely, and is confident the removed content is legitimate. Otherwise, the the removed content should be examined to see if it's legitimate and returned to the article if it is. | |||
#Should test edits be reverted? | |||
#:yes. They need to be removed as soon as possible. | |||
#What is the difference between a test edit and vandalism? | |||
#:A test edit is usually a good faith edit made by a new user unfamiliar with editing wikipedia. Vandalism is a deliberate attempt to harm wikipedia. | |||
Hope the best of luck. Cheers! — ]] 15:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
*I finished my third test. ] (]) 18:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Talkback == | |||
{{talkback|Hahc21|Test 3|ts=18:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
— ]] 18:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Migraine == | |||
Addressed your last few concerns. Many thanks for the review. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:You're very welcome. I learned a lot from your article so it was my pleasure. ] (]) 13:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Good work; let's do it again next week! - Dank (]) 14:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks! I appreciate knowing that what I'm doing is ok! ] (]) 14:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Some sources on Indian cinema == | |||
Some books helpful in Wikiproject Indian cinema would be: | |||
*{{cite book|last1=Rajadhyaksha|first1=Ashish|last2=Willemen|first2=Paul|title=Encyclopaedia of Indian cinema|date=26 June 1999|publisher=British Film Institute|isbn=978-1579581466}} | |||
*{{cite book|last=Thoraval|first=Yves|title=The cinemas of India|date=1 February 2000|publisher=Macmillan India|isbn=978-0-333-93410-4}} | |||
*{{cite book|last=Ganti|first=Tejaswini|title=Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema|date=24 August 2004|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-28854-5}} | |||
*{{cite book|last1=Gokulsing|first1=K. Moti|last2=Dissanayake|first2=Wimal|title=Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change|year=2004|publisher=Trentham Books|isbn=978-1-85856-329-9}} | |||
*{{cite book|author=National Film Development Corporation of India|title=Indian cinema: a visual voyage|year=1998|publisher=Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India|isbn=978-81-230-0646-8}} | |||
*{{cite book|last1=Ramachandran|first1=T. M.|last2=Rukmini|first2=S.|title=70 years of Indian cinema, 1913-1983|date=June 1985|publisher=CINEMA India-International|isbn=978-0-86132-090-5}} | |||
*{{cite book|last=Rishi|first=Tilak|title=Bless You Bollywood!: A Tribute to Hindi Cinema on Completing 100 Years|date=1 June 2012|publisher=Trafford Publishing|isbn=978-1-4669-3963-9}} | |||
There should be some more. I remember my family used to have an encyclopedia of Indian films when I was a child (in 1980s)-- but I can not remember the name of the book. Regards.--] (]) 16:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks! I'm going to look into seeing these books. ] (]) 01:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ] is now a good article, thanks for your help on that! ] (]) 17:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== Talkback == | |||
{{Tb|Nettrom|why does SuggestBot leave stars and icons on my page?|ts=17:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)}} |
Latest revision as of 19:58, 27 March 2024
This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Mattisse (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Good article reassessment for Siege of Mantua (1799)
Siege of Mantua (1799) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Benjamin G. Humphreys Bridge
Benjamin G. Humphreys Bridge has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Samuel Colt
Samuel Colt has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Category: