Misplaced Pages

Schmidt sting pain index: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:23, 10 October 2012 edit190.44.158.38 (talk) These descriptions were not given by schmidt, in any of his published works. consensus doesn't trump reality.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:43, 22 November 2024 edit undoChoess (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators78,763 editsm Pain level 3: more specific link 
(403 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Pain scale for insect stings}}
]'')]]
{{Infobox diagnostic
The '''Schmidt Sting Pain Index''' is a ] rating the relative ] caused by different ]n stings. It is mainly the work of ], an ] at the ] Bee Research Center in Arizona. Schmidt has published a number of papers on the subject and claims to have been stung by the majority of stinging ].
| name = Schmidt sting pain index
| image = Schmidt - Filippo Turetta.jpg
| alt =
| caption = Some species representing the Schmidt sting pain index: ''], ]'', '']'' sp., '']'' sp., and '']''.
| pronounce =
| purpose = Rates the pain of different stings
}}


The '''Schmidt sting pain index''' is a ] rating the relative ] caused by different ]n stings. It is mainly the work of ], who was an ] at the ] Bee Research Center in ]. Schmidt published a number of works on the subject and claimed to have been stung by the majority of stinging Hymenoptera. {{Citation needed|reason=Your explanation here|date=August 2024}}
His original paper in 1984 was an attempt to systematize and compare the ] properties of insect venoms.<ref>Schmidt, J. O., Blum, M. S., and Overal, W. L. "Hemolytic activities of stinging insect venoms", Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 1:155–160, 1984.</ref> The index contained in the paper started from 0 for stings that are completely ineffective against humans, progressed through 2, a familiar pain such as a common bee or ] sting and finished at 4 for the most painful stings. In the conclusion, some descriptions of the most painful examples were given, e.g.: "'']'' stings induced immediate, excruciating pain and numbness to pencil-point pressure, as well as trembling in the form of a totally uncontrollable urge to shake the affected part."


His original paper in 1983 was a way to systematize and compare the ] properties of insect venoms.<ref name= "Original">{{cite journal|doi=10.1002/arch.940010205|pages=155–160|title=Hemolytic activities of stinging insect venoms|journal=Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology|volume=1|issue=2|year=1983|last1=Schmidt|first1=Justin O.|last2=Blum|first2=Murray S.|last3=Overal|first3=William L.}}</ref> A table contained in the paper included a column that rated sting pain, starting from 0 for stings that are completely ineffective against humans, progressing through 2, a familiar pain such as that caused by a common bee or ] sting, and finishing at 4 for the most painful stings; in the original paper, only the bullet ant, '']'', was given a rating of 4. Later revised versions of the index added '']'', along with ]s as the only species to share this ranking. Descriptions of the most painful examples were given, e.g.: "''Paraponera clavata'' stings induced immediate, excruciating pain and numbness to pencil-point pressure, as well as trembling in the form of a totally uncontrollable urge to shake the affected part."<ref name="Original"/>
Subsequently, Schmidt has refined his scale, culminating in a paper published in 1990 which classifies the stings of 78 species and 41 genera of Hymenoptera. Schmidt described some of the experiences in vivid detail.<ref>Schmidt, Justin O. "Hymenoptera venoms: striving toward the ultimate defense against vertebrates" in D. L. Evans and J. O. Schmidt (Eds.), "Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators" pp. 387–419, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1990.</ref>


Schmidt repeatedly refined his scale, including a paper published in 1990, which classifies the stings of 78 species and 41 genera of Hymenoptera,<ref name="schmidt venoms">{{cite book | last=Schmidt|first= Justin O. | chapter=Hymenoptera Venoms: Striving Toward the Ultimate Defense Against Vertebrates | editor1=D. L. Evans |editor2= J. O. Schmidt | title=Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators | pages=387–419 | publisher=State University of New York Press | location=Albany, New York | year=1990 |isbn=0-88706-896-0}}</ref> and culminating in a book published in 2016.<ref name="stingofthewild">{{cite book|last1=Schmidt|first1=Justin|title=The Sting of the Wild|date=2016|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|location=Baltimore, Maryland|isbn=978-1-4214-1929-9}}</ref>
An entry in '']'' reported that the following "implausibly exact numbers" do not appear in any of Schmidt’s published scientific papers but were "wheedled out of him" by ] magazine for an article it published in 1996.<ref name=dope>Cecil Adams (May 11, 2012) , ''The Straight Dope''</ref>

{|class="wikitable sortable"
While Schmidt's published scientific papers use a 1 through 4 number scale, an entry in '']'' reported that "implausibly exact numbers" such as "bullhorn acacia ant at 1.8" were "wheedled out of him" by ] magazine for an article it published in 1996.<ref name="dope">{{Cite web |date=2012-05-11 |title=Did the creator of the Schmidt Sting Pain Index volunteer to get stung by everything on earth? |url=https://www.straightdope.com/21344144/did-the-creator-of-the-schmidt-sting-pain-index-volunteer-to-get-stung-by-everything-on-earth |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=The Straight Dope |language=en}}</ref>
|+ Schmidt Sting Pain Index<ref>Berenbaum, May. "", American Entomologist, v. 49 n. 2, pp. 68-69</ref>

|-
In September 2015, Schmidt was co-awarded the ] Physiology and Entomology prize with Michael Smith for their Hymenoptera research.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34278595 |title='Universal urination duration' wins Ig Nobel prize |last1=Webb |first1=Jonathan |date=18 September 2015 |work=BBC News }}</ref>
!Index

!Animal
== Overview ==
|-
]'s pain scale of ]n stings is organized into levels, ranging between 1 and 4, with 4 being the most painful. However, insect stings that feel very different can be put into the same level. Thus, later versions of the scale always include a brief description of his experience being stung by each type of insect.<ref name="NYTimes article">{{cite news|last1=Steinberg|first1=Avi|title=The Connoisseur of Pain|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/magazine/the-connoisseur-of-pain.html|work=The New York Times Magazine|date=18 August 2016}}</ref>
|1.0

|]
=== Pain level 1 ===
|-
Some of the insect stings Schmidt considered to be at a pain level of 1 include the ], the ], the ], the ], and most small ]s. The duration of the pain of insect stings categorized into Pain Level 1 generally is five minutes or less.<ref name="schmidt venoms" />
|1.2

|]
Many small bees are categorized into a pain level of 1, with their ] containing ] such as ], ], and ]. Melittin is the main toxin of bee venom, and it damages ]s and ]s. Apamin is a ] that augments ]. MCD peptide destroys ]s.<ref name="beewaspvenoms">{{cite journal|last1=Habermann|first1=E.|title=Bee and Wasp Venoms|journal=Science|date=28 July 1972|volume=177|issue=4046|pages=314–322|doi=10.1126/science.177.4046.314|pmid=4113805|bibcode=1972Sci...177..314H}}</ref>
|-

|1.8
Feeling only slight pain, Schmidt described the sting of an urban digger bee, categorized into pain level 1, as "almost pleasant, a lover just bit your earlobe a little too hard."<ref name="stingofthewild" /> Also rated into pain level 1, Schmidt has described the sting of a ] as "light, ephemeral, almost fruity. A tiny spark has singed a single hair on your arm."<ref name="stingofthewild" />
|]

|-
=== Pain level 2 ===
|2.0
Schmidt set the sting of the ] at a pain level of 2 to be the anchoring value, basing his categorization of all other stings on it.<ref name="NYTimes article" /> He has categorized a variety of ]s, ]s, and ]s into pain level 2, including ]s, the ], the ], and the ]. The duration of the pain of the stings in this level is generally between five and ten minutes long. Schmidt categorized the majority of ]n stings as having a pain level of 2.<ref name="schmidt venoms" />
|]

|-
The sting of a ], categorized as a pain level of 2, has a similar feeling as "the debilitating pain of a migraine contained in the tip of your finger," according to Schmidt.<ref name="stingofthewild" /> On the contrary, a ]'s sting was described as being "hot and smoky, almost irreverent. Imagine ] extinguishing a cigar on your tongue."<ref name="stingofthewild" /> He also described the sting of the honeybee as a similar feeling to “The oven mitt had a hole in it when you pulled the cookies out of the oven.”
|2.0

|]
=== Pain level 3 ===
|-
Most insects that are characterized as having a pain level of 3 are wasps, including the neotropical ], the ], and ] (a wingless wasp and not a true ant). The duration of the sting pain can range anywhere from one minute (such as the sting of the red paper wasp) to half an hour (such as the sting of the velvet ant).<ref name="schmidt venoms" /><ref name="stingofthewild" /> Wasp ] uniquely contains ]. One of the kinins found in wasp venom, "polistes kinin 3", is found to lead to similar effects on ] and ] as ].<ref name="beewaspvenoms" />
|0 – 2.0

|] and ]
Some ants are also rated at a pain level 3, including the ] and the ]. Schmidt considered the sting of the Maricopa harvester ant as having a pain level of 3, describing it as such: "After eight unrelenting hours of drilling into that ingrown toenail, you find the drill wedged into the toe."<ref name="stingofthewild" />
|-

|3.0
=== Pain level 4 ===
|]
Pain level 4 is the highest level in the Schmidt sting pain index. Schmidt's original index rated only one such example, the sting of the ], as a 4.<ref name= "Original"/> Schmidt described the sting as "pure, intense, brilliant pain...like walking over flaming charcoal with a three-inch nail embedded in your heel."<ref name="stingofthewild"/> The bullet ant's venom primarily contains ], a paralyzing ] ].<ref name="FEBS poneratoxin">{{cite journal |last1=Szolajska|first1=Ewa |last2=Poznanski|first2=Jaroslaw |last3=Ferber|first3=Miguel López |last4=Michalik|first4=Joanna |last5=Gout|first5=Evelyne |last6=Fender|first6=Pascal |last7=Bailly|first7=Isabelle |last8=Dublet|first8=Bernard |last9=Chroboczek|first9=Jadwiga |title=Poneratoxin, a neurotoxin from ant venom |journal=The FEBS Journal |date=2004 |volume=271 |issue=11 |pages=2127–2136 |doi=10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04128.x|pmid=15153103|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|-

|3.0
Schmidt later gave the sting of a tarantula hawk species, '']'',{{efn|Reported under its synonym, P. formosa}} a rating of a 4,<ref name="schmidt venoms"/> which he described as "blinding, fierce shockingly electric",<ref name="stingofthewild"/> though the duration of pain from the sting is short-lived, lasting only approximately five minutes.<ref name="schmidt venoms"/> The composition of tarantula hawk venom is unknown.<ref name=Schmidt2004>{{cite journal |last1=Schmidt |first1=Justin O. |date=2004 |title=Venom and the Good Life in Tarantula Hawks (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae): How to Eat, Not be Eaten, and Live Long |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25086231 |journal=Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society |volume=77 |issue=4 |pages=402–413 |doi=10.2317/E-39.1|jstor=25086231 |s2cid=86401017 }}</ref>
|]

|-
Schmidt also later rated the sting of '']'' as a 4, describing it as "Torture. You are chained in the flow of an active volcano. Why did I start this list?",<ref name="stingofthewild"/> saying the pain lasts up to two hours.<ref name="stingofthewild"/>
|4.0

|]
== Evolution from painful to toxic stings ==
|-
The Schmidt sting pain index arose from the pursuit of a larger ]: that the evolution of ] in ] was dependent on the evolution of venom that was both painful and toxic.<ref name="NYTimes article" /> Pain is a signal of damage in the body, but molecules that produce pain and those that are toxic, and actively cause damage, are not the same. Although the painful signal acts as a deterrent, intelligent predators learn the dishonesty of this signal with repeated exposure – that there is no real damage being done.<ref name="stingofthewild"/> For the early Hymenoptera that were primarily solitary, the pain alone would allow them the chance to escape. Furthermore, solitary insects do not provide a high energy reward for predators, and therefore predators do not expend significant effort to hunt them. However, with the evolution of sociality where many Hymenoptera cluster together in colonies, nests become a nutritionally rich and therefore worthwhile target.<ref name="evolutionaryresponses">{{cite journal|last1=Schmidt|first1=Justin|title=Evolutionary responses of solitary and social Hymenoptera to predation by primates and overwhelmingly powerful vertebrate predators|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|date=22 March 2014|volume=71|pages=12–19|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.018|pmid=24666602}}</ref> If there were no defences, predators would devour the defenceless society, leaving few surviving individuals.<ref name="stingofthewild"/> Sociality would therefore not be beneficial. In order for sociality to evolve, Hymenoptera needed a defence beyond a painful sting to protect their whole colony. Their sting was an advertisement of damage, and toxicity evolved as its truth. With a toxic sting, and thus the ability to protect against predators, Hymenoptera were able to progress towards sociality and its associated evolutionary benefits of the shared raising of youth, individual task specialization, inter-colony communication, and food storage.<ref name="evolutionaryresponses" />
|4.0!+

|]
To approach studying this evolutionary connection between toxicity and sociality, Schmidt recognised there needed to be a quantitative measure with which to score the painfulness of stings. Assays for toxicity are already well characterized and can be quantified, but without the Schmidt sting pain index, there would be no way to relate the amount of sociality to the level of pain, and therefore this hypothesis could not have been studied.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Conniff |first1=Richard |date=10 August 2009 |title=Oh, Sting, Where Is Thy Death? |url=https://happydays.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/oh-sting-where-is-thy-death/?_r=0 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180127143326/https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com//2009/08/10/oh-sting-where-is-thy-death/?_r=0 |archive-date=27 Jan 2018 |access-date=7 May 2017 |work=]}}</ref>
|}


== See also == == See also ==
* ] to measure pain * ] to measure pain
* ] "A Pain Scale for Bee, Wasp and Ant Stings" by Christopher Starr * ] by Christopher Starr, based on the Schmidt index
* '']'', a TV series with another pain index
* ] The creator of the "Schmidt Sting Pain Index"

==Notes==
{{notelist}}


== References == == References ==
{{reflist|30em}}
<references/>

== Further reading ==
* Berenbaum, May. , in '']'', (Summer 2003).
* Conniff, Richard. "The King of Sting", in ''],'' v. 21 n. 4 (April 1996), pp.&nbsp;82–84, 147. * Conniff, Richard. "The King of Sting", in ''],'' v. 21 n. 4 (April 1996), pp.&nbsp;82–84, 147.
* Conniff, Richard. "", '']'', June 2003. * Conniff, Richard. "", '']'', June 2003.
* Evans, David L. ''Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators'', , 1990. ISBN 0-88706-896-0


== External links ==
]
* - Includes the graphic below
]
*


]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 03:43, 22 November 2024

Pain scale for insect stings Medical diagnostic method
Schmidt sting pain index
Some species representing the Schmidt sting pain index: Synoeca surinama, Paraponera clavata, Pepsis sp., Hemipepsis sp., and Vespa mandarinia.
PurposeRates the pain of different stings

The Schmidt sting pain index is a pain scale rating the relative pain caused by different hymenopteran stings. It is mainly the work of Justin O. Schmidt, who was an entomologist at the Carl Hayden Bee Research Center in Arizona. Schmidt published a number of works on the subject and claimed to have been stung by the majority of stinging Hymenoptera.

His original paper in 1983 was a way to systematize and compare the hemolytic properties of insect venoms. A table contained in the paper included a column that rated sting pain, starting from 0 for stings that are completely ineffective against humans, progressing through 2, a familiar pain such as that caused by a common bee or wasp sting, and finishing at 4 for the most painful stings; in the original paper, only the bullet ant, Paraponera clavata, was given a rating of 4. Later revised versions of the index added Synoeca septentrionalis, along with tarantula hawks as the only species to share this ranking. Descriptions of the most painful examples were given, e.g.: "Paraponera clavata stings induced immediate, excruciating pain and numbness to pencil-point pressure, as well as trembling in the form of a totally uncontrollable urge to shake the affected part."

Schmidt repeatedly refined his scale, including a paper published in 1990, which classifies the stings of 78 species and 41 genera of Hymenoptera, and culminating in a book published in 2016.

While Schmidt's published scientific papers use a 1 through 4 number scale, an entry in The Straight Dope reported that "implausibly exact numbers" such as "bullhorn acacia ant at 1.8" were "wheedled out of him" by Outside magazine for an article it published in 1996.

In September 2015, Schmidt was co-awarded the Ig Nobel Physiology and Entomology prize with Michael Smith for their Hymenoptera research.

Overview

Schmidt's pain scale of Hymenopteran stings is organized into levels, ranging between 1 and 4, with 4 being the most painful. However, insect stings that feel very different can be put into the same level. Thus, later versions of the scale always include a brief description of his experience being stung by each type of insect.

Pain level 1

Some of the insect stings Schmidt considered to be at a pain level of 1 include the Southern fire ant, the graceful twig ant, the Western paper wasp, the urban digger bee, and most small bees. The duration of the pain of insect stings categorized into Pain Level 1 generally is five minutes or less.

Many small bees are categorized into a pain level of 1, with their venom containing polypeptides such as melittin, apamin, and MCD peptide. Melittin is the main toxin of bee venom, and it damages red blood cells and white blood cells. Apamin is a neurotoxin that augments polysynaptic reflexes. MCD peptide destroys mast cells.

Feeling only slight pain, Schmidt described the sting of an urban digger bee, categorized into pain level 1, as "almost pleasant, a lover just bit your earlobe a little too hard." Also rated into pain level 1, Schmidt has described the sting of a sweat bee as "light, ephemeral, almost fruity. A tiny spark has singed a single hair on your arm."

Pain level 2

Schmidt set the sting of the Western honey bee at a pain level of 2 to be the anchoring value, basing his categorization of all other stings on it. He has categorized a variety of wasps, bees, and ants into pain level 2, including yellowjackets, the Asiatic honey bee, the trap-jaw ant, and the bald-faced hornet. The duration of the pain of the stings in this level is generally between five and ten minutes long. Schmidt categorized the majority of Hymenopteran stings as having a pain level of 2.

The sting of a termite-raiding ant, categorized as a pain level of 2, has a similar feeling as "the debilitating pain of a migraine contained in the tip of your finger," according to Schmidt. On the contrary, a yellowjacket's sting was described as being "hot and smoky, almost irreverent. Imagine W. C. Fields extinguishing a cigar on your tongue." He also described the sting of the honeybee as a similar feeling to “The oven mitt had a hole in it when you pulled the cookies out of the oven.”

Pain level 3

Most insects that are characterized as having a pain level of 3 are wasps, including the neotropical red paper wasp, the red-headed paper wasp, and Klug's velvet ant (a wingless wasp and not a true ant). The duration of the sting pain can range anywhere from one minute (such as the sting of the red paper wasp) to half an hour (such as the sting of the velvet ant). Wasp venom uniquely contains kinin. One of the kinins found in wasp venom, "polistes kinin 3", is found to lead to similar effects on smooth musculature and circulation as bradykinin.

Some ants are also rated at a pain level 3, including the giant bull ant and the Maricopa harvester ant. Schmidt considered the sting of the Maricopa harvester ant as having a pain level of 3, describing it as such: "After eight unrelenting hours of drilling into that ingrown toenail, you find the drill wedged into the toe."

Pain level 4

Pain level 4 is the highest level in the Schmidt sting pain index. Schmidt's original index rated only one such example, the sting of the bullet ant, as a 4. Schmidt described the sting as "pure, intense, brilliant pain...like walking over flaming charcoal with a three-inch nail embedded in your heel." The bullet ant's venom primarily contains poneratoxin, a paralyzing neurotoxic peptide.

Schmidt later gave the sting of a tarantula hawk species, Pepsis grossa, a rating of a 4, which he described as "blinding, fierce shockingly electric", though the duration of pain from the sting is short-lived, lasting only approximately five minutes. The composition of tarantula hawk venom is unknown.

Schmidt also later rated the sting of Synoeca septentrionalis as a 4, describing it as "Torture. You are chained in the flow of an active volcano. Why did I start this list?", saying the pain lasts up to two hours.

Evolution from painful to toxic stings

The Schmidt sting pain index arose from the pursuit of a larger hypothesis: that the evolution of sociality in Hymenoptera was dependent on the evolution of venom that was both painful and toxic. Pain is a signal of damage in the body, but molecules that produce pain and those that are toxic, and actively cause damage, are not the same. Although the painful signal acts as a deterrent, intelligent predators learn the dishonesty of this signal with repeated exposure – that there is no real damage being done. For the early Hymenoptera that were primarily solitary, the pain alone would allow them the chance to escape. Furthermore, solitary insects do not provide a high energy reward for predators, and therefore predators do not expend significant effort to hunt them. However, with the evolution of sociality where many Hymenoptera cluster together in colonies, nests become a nutritionally rich and therefore worthwhile target. If there were no defences, predators would devour the defenceless society, leaving few surviving individuals. Sociality would therefore not be beneficial. In order for sociality to evolve, Hymenoptera needed a defence beyond a painful sting to protect their whole colony. Their sting was an advertisement of damage, and toxicity evolved as its truth. With a toxic sting, and thus the ability to protect against predators, Hymenoptera were able to progress towards sociality and its associated evolutionary benefits of the shared raising of youth, individual task specialization, inter-colony communication, and food storage.

To approach studying this evolutionary connection between toxicity and sociality, Schmidt recognised there needed to be a quantitative measure with which to score the painfulness of stings. Assays for toxicity are already well characterized and can be quantified, but without the Schmidt sting pain index, there would be no way to relate the amount of sociality to the level of pain, and therefore this hypothesis could not have been studied.

See also

Notes

  1. Reported under its synonym, P. formosa

References

  1. ^ Schmidt, Justin O.; Blum, Murray S.; Overal, William L. (1983). "Hemolytic activities of stinging insect venoms". Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 1 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1002/arch.940010205.
  2. ^ Schmidt, Justin O. (1990). "Hymenoptera Venoms: Striving Toward the Ultimate Defense Against Vertebrates". In D. L. Evans; J. O. Schmidt (eds.). Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 387–419. ISBN 0-88706-896-0.
  3. ^ Schmidt, Justin (2016). The Sting of the Wild. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1-4214-1929-9.
  4. "Did the creator of the Schmidt Sting Pain Index volunteer to get stung by everything on earth?". The Straight Dope. 2012-05-11. Retrieved 2024-04-19.
  5. Webb, Jonathan (18 September 2015). "'Universal urination duration' wins Ig Nobel prize". BBC News.
  6. ^ Steinberg, Avi (18 August 2016). "The Connoisseur of Pain". The New York Times Magazine.
  7. ^ Habermann, E. (28 July 1972). "Bee and Wasp Venoms". Science. 177 (4046): 314–322. Bibcode:1972Sci...177..314H. doi:10.1126/science.177.4046.314. PMID 4113805.
  8. Szolajska, Ewa; Poznanski, Jaroslaw; Ferber, Miguel López; Michalik, Joanna; Gout, Evelyne; Fender, Pascal; Bailly, Isabelle; Dublet, Bernard; Chroboczek, Jadwiga (2004). "Poneratoxin, a neurotoxin from ant venom". The FEBS Journal. 271 (11): 2127–2136. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04128.x. PMID 15153103.
  9. Schmidt, Justin O. (2004). "Venom and the Good Life in Tarantula Hawks (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae): How to Eat, Not be Eaten, and Live Long". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 77 (4): 402–413. doi:10.2317/E-39.1. JSTOR 25086231. S2CID 86401017.
  10. ^ Schmidt, Justin (22 March 2014). "Evolutionary responses of solitary and social Hymenoptera to predation by primates and overwhelmingly powerful vertebrate predators". Journal of Human Evolution. 71: 12–19. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.018. PMID 24666602.
  11. Conniff, Richard (10 August 2009). "Oh, Sting, Where Is Thy Death?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 Jan 2018. Retrieved 7 May 2017.

Further reading

External links

Categories: