| Revision as of 22:52, 26 October 2012 view sourcePrioryman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers27,963 edits →Notification: - last warning← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:12, 5 November 2018 view source Jusdafax (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers101,919 edits Remove stale template message mooted by ban |
| (454 intermediate revisions by 99 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
== November 2013 == |
|
{{NOINDEX}} |
|
|
|
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for sending harassing email. Access to your talk page has been withdrawn.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. If you do not have Misplaced Pages email enabled, please see the instructions at ]. However, you should read the ] first. ] (]) 08:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> |
|
|
|
|
{{busy}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::<big>'''Welcome to Youreallycan's talkpage. If you are unable to post here <u></u>.'''</big> |
|
|
|
|
|
{{userbox | border-c = #8888aa | id = ] | id-c = lightskyblue | info-c = #DFD | info = This user previously edited as ''']'''.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Veteran Editor IV|right}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{|class="messagebox" |
|
|
|rowspan="2"|] |
|
|
|<div id="talk" style="text-align:center; background-color:#ccf; padding:5px; clear:both;> |
|
|
'''''Welcome'''''<div align="left"> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|<div class="plainlinks"> |
|
|
If you start a discussion here on my talkpage I will likely respond on this page as I like to keep discussion complete in one location. If you post an imo attacking comment here I will just delete it and you will no longer be welcome on my talkpage untill I remove the restriction.If I feel the discussion is confrontational or attacking I also reserve the right to request you to host it on your own talkpage. If I move the discussion to your talkpage please do not replace it here, I will delete it.</div></div> |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Back from wikibreak == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello to the User formerly known as Rio Rob! I'm coming back from my own wiki break and just wanted to check in on ya my friend. Hope things are going well and we'll see ya back soon. ] (]) 14:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Cool dude, thanks for the note, things are going good - talk soon - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 04:25, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::G'day, and welcome back. After you left, there were some changes made to ]. Can I suggest you take a look and make sure they reflect the actual undertaking you committed to? --] (]) 05:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Ta Anthony - I have had a look and is seems little was changed to make any difference - I appreciate you letting me know - Regards - Rob - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 05:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Hey, welcome back, Loyal Defender of the BLP's. :) ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 05:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Aw - hah, hi Bugs. Good to see you all - just very small way making a few contributions over the next few weeks - real life is hectic at the moment - good wishes and good luck to everyone - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 05:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Welcome back YRC. Just to satisfy a niggly question I've been sitting on, did you, on or about 04 October, ask {{user|Dennis Brown}} somewhere offline to cancel your wikibreak enforcer? I'm glad you waited the full term you asked for originally, it's just an i I'd like to cross, or a t to dot. Thanks & regards! ] (]) 06:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thank you Fran for the welcome back - yes I did ask Dennis via a recognised email contact to revert the extension I had previously requested - its been a two month wikibreak since I contributed - regards - Rob <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 06:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
Good to see you came back! ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thank you Snowed. You are one of those shiny points in my contributing here and I am grateful to you for your ] and willingness to forgive and forget and move on in friendship/respect. - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 06:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Great to see you've returned, YRC. Welcome back. ] (]) 04:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Cool , thanks GD - your encouragement and support meant, and means a lot to me. Best regards to you GoodDay - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 06:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome back! ] (]) 12:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks Joe, good to see you also - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 05:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to see you back - hope you're refreshed from your break! ] (]) 17:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Appreciate the welcome Hal. I am only slowly returning to contributing here, but, yes, I am well refreshed. Thank you - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 05:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Talk:Alan Jones (radio broadcaster)?... == |
|
|
{{archive top|] was cut and copy paste/repeating himself so I have closed the discussion (cut and copy pasting the same question is no longer discussion as we know it captain)}} |
|
|
{{la|Alan Jones (radio broadcaster)}} |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure some of the content you archived did veer into off-topic/notaforum areas, but I've never seen an archive established with some posts being less than one day old... ] (]) 05:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Hi - This is all the content I archived - - it was all from 2007? - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 05:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Somehow there are recent posts in the Archive, see the various post-dates in . Ok, looked through the Archive's and the recent posts were placed there by Timeshift9 with , so my bad....I can see why you were puzzled about my note. Not sure what to do about the recent posts/threads (with those October 2012 dates, some from just a day or two ago...)... ] (]) 17:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Hi Shearonink - recent posts in a talkpage can be replaced - unless there is anything important, - I would just let it go - regards - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 17:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Well, the problem is that the posting timeline has now been altered...couldn't that be considered refactoring? I admit I haven't read through all the posts that were removed then restored then removed etc. but if people were making off-topic rants or nonsense posts that have nothing to do with improving the article then that would be vandalism/notaforum and it's my understanding that such posts can be summarily deleted from view...I'm just finding the whole recent cut/paste moving/removing/restoring of posts (some of which were recent) to the Archive to be somewhat confusing. I am more familiar with automatic archiving and feel that it keeps posting/replying timelines intact. In looking at the page's Archives, I noticed that you added NOINDEX to the Archive when I haven't seen that code on other talk pages' archives - I was wondering why you added that. Thanks, ] (]) 18:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::] - stops the page being returned on google searches- <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::What's special about this BLP talk page that marks it out from all the other BLP talk pages? --] (]) 22:26, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Any page about a living person you come across is ''special'' and you should do your best to ''protect it'' - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::What's special about ''this'' BLP talk page that marks it out from all the '''other''' BLP talk pages? --] (]) 22:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
{{archive bottom}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{talkback|Banaticus|October 2012}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Walk away == |
|
|
It's really not a good idea to get involved in an ANI fracas. There is no shortage of pro or anti Malleus editors to join the fray, and, given your editing sanctions, I'd hate to see you get caught up in the crossfire. <small>]</small> 22:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:I came to say the same thing. You can MONGO clashing heads will only piss off you, him, and other people - it's not likely to achieve anything. Sleep on it :) --''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 22:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Yes thank you Ent / Errant- I am aware of those issues and appreciate your note - thanks - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
YRC, you may find by Drmies interesting. In fact when I first saw it I thought I reading something I had written myself a long time ago. ] (]) 00:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thank you for the link, well worth reading, I am also ''getting old'' lol - it was late in my personal disrupted timezone and I really appreciate the nudges from you all - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 19:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== reconsider? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure that the was not actually the best way forward? -- ] 22:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:The case has a large community commentary and deserves a more detailed closure - imo - 22:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
*Obviously, Strats idea was the best way forward, but YRC still did the right thing. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 22:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)a |
|
|
::(e/c) Do you think any "more detailed close" would actually have any chance to provide a better outcome? -- ] 22:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Yes I do - I think the committee and the clerks need to close the request, its an official for arbitration, not something that should be closed by a single user ignoring all rules. - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::OK, but I myself am pretty sure that this is one case where Ignoring the Rules would certainly have improved the encyclopedia. -- ] 22:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Respectfully, I disagree with you on this issue - I feel an Arbitration closure is needed here and that a decent, considered closure will improve the en wiki project. - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::yeah, but what are the actual chances of THAT happening? ;-) -- ] 22:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::As I can see we are getting, slowly slowly a considered Arbcom closure. - I don't agree with some closures here but I accept them unless they are completely ridiculous - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Cat CSD == |
|
|
|
|
|
Any chance of you commenting out the BLP template at ]? It has transcluded (or whatever the term may be) the entire policy there. Ta. - ] (]) 00:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::They are all living people? <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 00:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Yes. But that is irrelevant. Why would you transclude the entire ] page to the category talk page anyway? No worries, though: someone else has removed it. - ] (]) 00:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== A.Raja == |
|
|
I have made a complaint/request in Biography of living persons Noticeboard, regarding ] I havent got any reply after since i posted on 17:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC). I reproduce here for your reference, please take immediate action. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{la|A. Raja}} |
|
|
|
|
|
In biography of A.Raja, the section "2G Spectrum scandal" & "the Box" contains potentially libellous, such material is repeatedly inserted, it violates the BLP policies, |
|
|
* It's written in news style; of first-hand news reports on breaking stories; INCLUDED routine news reporting on things; breaking news are emphasized; these sources lead to overdetailed articles that look like a diary. |
|
|
|
|
|
* not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion; Timely news subjects not suitable and therefore "is significantly NOT enough to be included in the biography of a person". Overall the sources and sentences are 'negative in tone', ' they appear to have been created to disparage the subject' & Materials clearly not added in good faith. |
|
|
|
|
|
Editors ] & ] are repetadly inserting the materials, even after mentioning the violation of rules |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
# ]. |
|
|
There is s seperate "2G spectrum section" , but still, the informations inserted are in excess than actual Biography, to Malign the person. |
|
|
Keep an eye on the Editors & Please give protection status to this article. ] (]) 17:57, 24 October 2012 p(UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please, please ,please take immediate action, waiting for your reply. ] (]) 14:31, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:(Talk page watcher comment). I don't see you discussing this on the article's talk page. Edit summaries alone do not suffice. Please do so, and do not edit war. ] (]) 15:05, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your reply, very valuable.] (]) 15:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Notification== |
|
|
|
|
|
I do not edit under my own name and I never have. Do not restore that or I will ask for sanctions against you per ]. ] (]) 22:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
YRC, this is your last warning. I have asked for your edits to be oversighted and you are heading for a permanent block, given your record, if you persist. ] (]) 22:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
