| Revision as of 02:53, 8 May 2006 editJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits →Alienus block← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:00, 14 December 2024 edit undoYedaman54 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,993 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor |
| (431 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=January 2023}} |
|
Welcome to my talk page - feedback on my editing is always appreciated - both good and bad! |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Culture}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Royalty and Nobility}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Germany}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=low|U.S. counties=yes|U.S. counties-importance=}} |
|
|
<div style="position: absolute; top: 50px; right: 100px; z-index: 2">]</div> |
|
*] From 6th Jan 2006 to 6th March 2006 |
|
*] From 6th Jan 2006 to 6th March 2006 |
|
*] From 6th March 2006 to 15th April 2006 |
|
*] From 6th March 2006 to 15th April 2006 |
|
|
*] From 16th April 2006 to 6th July 2006 |
|
|
*] From 6th July 2006 to 8th October 2006 |
|
|
*] From 8th October 2006 to 14th June 2007 |
|
|
*] From 14th June 2007 to 25th May 2008 |
|
|
*] From 25th May 2008 to 25th September 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== You're back! == |
|
*] my WIP page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Your Message on my talk page== |
|
|
Thanks again regarding your concerns on upholding wikipedia policies, you might wanna check out your ] user page for the same violation.. "Uda Balagena Kela Gahuwoth, it falls on your face" ;-) its suprising that his page is not on your watch list..] 09:39, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Your husbands user page carries a link to some website, if posting links on wiki is against policies.. you should remove that link.. Shouldn't you ] 10:39, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
OIC I didn't know that.. thanks.. "Umbe Ammata Hukanna" ] 16:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Thanks ...== |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Sophia, for standing up for what is right these last few days. IMHO you are one of the "people of good will" mentioned in the liturgy. I hope you have/had a nice Easter with your loved ones. ] ] 18:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I was on Wikibreak for much of the recent fracas about personnal information, and I appreciate your work in removing it. Thanks, ] <sup>]</sup> 21:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
As ] has over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourself, and a statement, to ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, |
|
|
|
|
|
]] 20:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== CJ election reminder == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div align="left" style="background-color:lightgreen; margin: 20; line-height: 1.5"> |
|
|
Hi SOPHIA |
|
|
<br><br> |
|
|
] |
|
|
I noticed that you are not registered for voting or nomination in the CJ elections, and would like to remind everyone that '''all Candidates Must Submit Their Statement By April 23rd. Voting will begin April 24th, and end May 1st'''. More details on how to nominate yourself can be found ''']'''. |
|
|
<br><br> |
|
|
I hope to see you at the elections! |
|
|
<br><br> |
|
|
<b><font color="orange">• The Giant Puffin •</font></b> 20:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC) </div> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Tea/Cool head== |
|
|
|
|
|
A cup of tea would be nice, thank you. I try not to respond at all on the article on ] until I've digested for several days as it gets me too upset. Thanks for adding the tag to the Talk page ] 16:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks. Something stronger is usually needed though] 21:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
==Double blue trouble== |
|
|
When you get a chance, check ] and ]. ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup><font color="#404040">]</font> 11:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:I removed a link from ] for the same reason. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
From Wikipediareview: |
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>About the contacting employer incident. I don't believe it. I think its fake. The one with Gator, I think was real, as he gave details (a letter), etc., but with KMHO3, I think its a stunt. Why no evidence or details? I'm just wondering the details about who contacted whose work place and in what manner?</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to sign on there and tell them what you know. If I try, they probably would not listen to me. ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup><font color="#404040">]</font> 08:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Jesus and Jesus-Myth == |
|
|
|
|
|
My only purpose was to make the pages editable again. I don't know what our policy is on deleting the link, so I won't do that; but I've left a note on the admin's noticeboard so that someone else may do so. -- ] 00:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Do me a favor. == |
|
|
|
|
|
Do me a favor: the Christian cabal (you know, the one that doesn't exist) is going to get me blocked for a while and I'm sure they'll be working extra hard to censor the relevant articles during my enforced absence, so please do your best to make sure ] is enforced. Thanks ] 12:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Community Justice Voting has Begun! == |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
I see you've registered to vote in the ] elections, and I'm just telling you that now you can vote! |
|
|
|
|
|
Please cast your vote(s) at ]; following instructions provided there. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, |
|
|
|
|
|
]] 12:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC) (current Chairman) |
|
|
|
|
|
==] and ]== |
|
|
Well, I just walked from one firestorm to another by commenting on the Christianity page as well as the Jesus page. Not too healthy. I wish there was a way to cure ill tempers but frankly, I am at a loss. Jim62sch has requested protection for the Jesus page, and I wonder if he should look in on the Christianity page as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ill tempers on the ] page as well, which I have decided ''not'' to get involved with despite my religious convictions. This is all getting to be far too much. |
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing wrong with a herd, as long as it doesn't stampede. Well, the cattle are spooked. Not a very healthy situation]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup><font color="#404040">]</font> 13:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===Just so you know...=== |
|
|
|
|
|
==Robsteadman account== |
|
|
Please check ] and contributions from the Robsteadman account today: {{user|Robsteadman}}. It appears Rob is trying to defend himself against the recent impersonation, and it's not going well. Also he's got into it with Deskana again. If this is not actually Rob, then something is very seriously wrong. ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup> 20:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:He's been temporarily blocked for trolling on my RfA. I try to not be suspicious but I do find it funny that there is a recent surge in activity from his account when someone he doesn't like nominates himself from adminship. --] ] <small>] (])</small> 20:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Collateral damage. There have been odd things going on lately. Enough for me to flee the ] page in mortal terror. ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup> 20:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Mortal terror indeed. And the Sith Lords like me are supposed to be the ones doing the terrifying! (Attempting to restore sense of humour :-) ) --] ] <small>] (])</small> 20:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==I haven't exactly gone yet.== |
|
|
"Don't go! You are a model wikipedian in difficult circumstances - we need more of your kind not less! Don't take this a suggestion to use sockpuppets! LOL" |
|
|
|
|
|
I am flattered as usual. However, as someone who was harrassed out of ], I just can't stand to see people harrass others, or treat others with suspicion. It's just become too much. |
|
|
|
|
|
Besides I noticed on CTSWyneken's RfA that high edit count per article ratios are frowned upon. His was about 9, mine is about 12, so what does that mean? I think I need to diversify. ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup> 23:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I've changed my mind. I'm taking a wikibreak. Thank you for explaining the situation to Doc Glasgow. Yes, I'm freaked out. ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup> 00:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
See response on http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Archola ] 09:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Short break, but I became frustrated with people at ] either talking past one another, or not recognizing the problem. Anyway, since Gio's been blocked for 3RR, perhaps we could continue the think tank at his talk page? ]<sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup> 18:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
Hi. I was unaware you had reported ] at ]. I only found out about it. Contrary to your assertions at the time, I never refused to delete the pages in question. In fact I asked the question "Do I have to delete them?" without getting an answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway there is further discussion on the matter ] if you are interested. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- --> |
|
|
|
|
|
:apologies for the lack of a sig ] 19:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: Thanks for the apologies. I have replied in depth ]. ] 21:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Just because some moistened bink lobbed a scimitar at me.. == |
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I have somehow managed to (almost) run out of topics to argue about. |
|
|
Care to join me at the ever popular and completely un-biased ] Talk? |
|
|
My current POV is that the entire concept was cooked up by Al Gore in order to facilitate a presidential platform in 2008. Or perhaps that it is really an aspect of ]. ^_^ --] 23:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Not the grail, the ]!! I figured it would be much more persuasive in arguments. I did not realize you were a Pastafarian, but a penchant for Pirates is sure to be applauded in most circles. --] 05:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I am glad that you enjoyed the article. Upon reading it I was immediatly rendered tickled pink, and have remained so much to my chagrin, as black is much more my color. Still it is nothing compared to being able to claim that on your page <font color=red><Big>death awaits you all with nasty, big, pointy teeth!!</big></font> |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Feedback please. - ]] <sup>]</sup> 04:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Thanks for the support on my RfA!== |
|
|
{| style="background-color: lightblue; border: solid 1px black;" |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| style="background-color: lightgreen; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px black;" |A belated thank you to you for '''Supporting''' ]! It passed 54/2/3, much better than I expected! I am still finding my feet as an ], and so far I am enjoying the experience. I am honoured that you felt I was ready to take up this position, and wish to thank you formally! I hope I can live up to your expectations of me. I truly do admire you as a Wikipedian! Thanks ever so much! :-D --] ] <small>]</small> --] ] <small>]</small> 19:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Reverting the sock == |
|
|
Not only okay, but very helpful. Thank you. If you see more of that particular kind of editing in the future, feel free to let an admin know. ] 21:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Circumcision advocacy == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You're back? Yes? Say yes! So good to see you on my feed!!! ]<small><sup>]</sup>]</small> 22:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
Could you please keep an eye on ]? I'm having an odd problem with ] reverting over and over again in support of Jayjg, but without the least bit of explanation. I've sent him a polite message but I'm not sure if he'll respond productively. Since I've done my 3 reverts, I would hate to imagine that he would be allowed to succeed in removing text simply on the basis of a technicality. One more reason ] is a good idea! Anyhow, please take a look and do whatever you think is necessary. ] 19:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:I'm going to try! Life is pretty nuts but there are some articles that interest me and I will try to make time. Good to see you too. ] 22:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::<nowiki>:-) </nowiki> Excellent. I hope r/l is nutty good and interesting, and not nutty bad and crazy-making. ]<small><sup>]</sup>]</small> 23:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
:While you're at it, take a peek at ]. ] 19:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|
::On the contrary, Sophia, thank you for making the effort to ensure that the text describes the opinions of ''others'', rather than endorsing a particular point of view. I still think that the article is better off without a detailed discussion of various opinions regarding circumcision, but if it must stay, I'm happy as long as it's presented in a neutral, factual, and verifiable manner. |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 --> |
|
::Incidentally, I removed the mention in the second paragraph, as it's inclusion implied that circumcision is a form of (ritual) mutilation. ] 16:12, 7 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
== ] of ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: |
|
Sophia, I would urge you to be very cautious about claims and counterclaims on any article connected to circumcision. Be very cautious about those who want to remove information. Consider the possibility that it may be an attempt at censorship. ] 02:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> |
|
:I would also urge you to consider the fact that activists typically cry "censorship" the first time ] is enforced on their pet articles. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 02:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. |
|
== Alienus block == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. |
|
It is already being discussed on his Talk: page, isn't it? Do you think it needs to be discussed somewhere else as well? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 02:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|
:I thought an admin is not supposed to block someone they are in content dispute with? Jayjg and Alienus are in edit disputes, where the comment was made. I thought that in this case Jayig would report it to get another admin. not involved in edit content coflicts to make a decision about puntivitve measures. This ensures objectivity and that the punitive action is not abused as a means to silence an oponent in an article. Also, this allows all other admins to see what is going on, and allows them to comment. On procedure grounds alone, I'd object to the way his one week block was carried out.] 02:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC) |
|
I'm not involved in a conflict dispute with Alienus on the article in which he made the personal attack; in fact, I've never edited it. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 02:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
