Misplaced Pages

Hardin v. Boyd: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:41, 20 December 2012 editDoctorKubla (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,937 edits Replacing deprecated {{wikify}} with {{underlinked}}← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:20, 13 September 2023 edit undoSer Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators6,318,134 edits add "use mdy dates" templateTag: AWB 
(17 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{underlinked|date=December 2012}} {{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case

{{SCOTUSCase
|Litigants=Hardin v. Boyd |Litigants=Hardin v. Boyd
|SubmitDate=December 22
|ArgueDate= January 5
|ArgueYear= 1885 |SubmitYear=1884
|DecideDate=January 26 |DecideDate=March 15
|DecideYear=1885 |DecideYear=1885
|FullName=Hardin v. Boyd |FullName=Hardin, Administratrix, & Others v. Boyd, Administrator, & Others
|USVol=113 |USVol=113
|USPage=227 |USPage=756
|ParallelCitations=5 S. Ct. 771; 28 ] 1141
|Citation=
|Prior= |Prior=
|Subsequent= |Subsequent=
|Holding= |Holding=
⚫ |Majority=Harlan
|SCOTUS=1882-1887
⚫ |JoinMajority=''unanimous''
⚫ |Majority=
⚫ |JoinMajority=
|LawsApplied= |LawsApplied=
}} }}


'''''Hardin v. Boyd''''', {{ussc|113|227|1885}}, was a motion to dismiss a suit on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ bf error to reverse it. Subsequently to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error<ref> ''Justia.com''</ref> '''''Hardin v. Boyd''''', 113 U.S. 756 (1885), was a motion to dismiss a ] on county bonds issued in aid of a ]. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The ] brought a writ of error to reverse it. Subsequently, to the judgment, the county settled with the ] and other ], by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. Fraud and collusion was alleged in the handling of a will which transferred ownership of property in ]. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error.<ref>{{ussc|name=Hardin v. Boyd|volume=113|page=756|pin=|year=1885}}.</ref>


The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed. The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.


==See also== == References ==
⚫ *]

==References==
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
* {{caselaw source
* ''Justia.com'' (full case)
| case = ''Hardin v. Boyd'', {{Ussc|113|756|1885|el=no}}
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/113/756/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep113/usrep113756/usrep113756.pdf
}}


] ]
⚫ ]
] ]
]




Latest revision as of 02:20, 13 September 2023

1885 United States Supreme Court case
Hardin v. Boyd
Supreme Court of the United States
Submitted December 22, 1884
Decided March 15, 1885
Full case nameHardin, Administratrix, & Others v. Boyd, Administrator, & Others
Citations113 U.S. 756 (more)5 S. Ct. 771; 28 L. Ed. 1141
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field
Joseph P. Bradley · John M. Harlan
William B. Woods · Stanley Matthews
Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford
Case opinion
MajorityHarlan, joined by unanimous

Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885), was a motion to dismiss a lawsuit on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ of error to reverse it. Subsequently, to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. Fraud and collusion was alleged in the handling of a will which transferred ownership of property in Crittenden County, Arkansas. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error.

The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.

References

  1. Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885).

External links


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: