| Revision as of 00:26, 27 December 2012 editBrianboulton (talk | contribs)100,115 edits →Infobox← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:38, 27 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 6 discussion(s) to Talk:Cosima Wagner/Archive 1) (botTag: Replaced |
| (203 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|action1=PR |
|
|action1=PR |
|
|action1date=09:59, 26 June 2012 |
|
|action1date=09:59, 26 June 2012 |
| Line 14: |
Line 15: |
|
|currentstatus=FA |
|
|currentstatus=FA |
|
|maindate=December 24, 2012 |
|
|maindate=December 24, 2012 |
|
|
|otd1date=2017-12-24|otd1oldid=816937652 |
|
|
|otd2date=2021-12-24|otd2oldid=1061802329 |
|
|
|otd3date=2022-08-13|otd3oldid=1103979358 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|blp=no|listas=Wagner, Cosima| |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=FA|a&e-priority=low|a&e-work-group=yes|listas=Wagner, Cosima}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=low|a&e-work-group=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Germany|class=FA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Richard Wagner|class=FA}} |
|
{{WikiProject Richard Wagner}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=|importance=}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women in Music|importance=Low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 1 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Cosima Wagner/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==The Festivals under Cosima== |
|
|
|
|
|
I've put this section into a box because it's not really about Cosima and I wasn't sure whether it would be better here or in the ] article. Please let me know if this causes problems in browsers other than firefox or IE.--] (]) 11:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== "Wagner, née de Flavigny, from 1844 born as Cosima Liszt" == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is that opening sentence intended to make sense? And in which language might that be? Is this Flavigny business plain old-fashioned vandalism? ] (]) 04:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:She was not "born de Flavigny"; that was her mother's maiden name. According to Liszt's biographer Derek Watson she was baptised "Francesca Gaetana Cosima Liszt". I have corrected the order of names and other misinformation in the opening paragraph. I am about to embark on a major article expansion and refurbishment, so much will change anyway over the next few weeks. ] (]) 14:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Infobox == |
|
|
|
|
|
I recently added an infobox to this article. My edit has just been reverted, for no given reason. The infobox should be restored. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 18:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Hi, Andy. While the article was TFA an infobox was added, removed, added again and removed again. Unsatisfactory, I agree, since the only justifications given for adding or removing were through (generally unhelpful) edit summaries. Changes likely to be contentious should always be raised on the talkpage before being implemented. |
|
|
:As I'm sure you know, ] states: ''The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article. Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article.'' In this case, there was no infobox in place when I began the article's expansion, and I was effectively the sole editor responsible for the expansion, though I invited participation. The involvement of other editors came during the peer review and FAC stages; the question of an infobox never, so far as I can remember, arose during these discussions. The assumed consensus, obviously, was that an infobox was not necessary in this case. |
|
|
:You obviously think that an infobox would enhance this article; let us have the arguments for this. No consensus is absolute or eternal, but let us have the discussions first, before taking action. ] (]) 00:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
