| Revision as of 17:11, 5 January 2013 editGandydancer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,205 edits →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:31, 8 January 2025 edit undoDarouet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,259 edits →Happy 2025: Thank you! And to you too. | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hi Darouet, welcome to Misplaced Pages! -] (]) 02:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | Hi Darouet, welcome to Misplaced Pages! -] (]) 02:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| {{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |title=] (]) |bot=ClueBot III |age=120 |numberstart=1 | maxarchsize=75000|header={{Automatic archive navigator}} |minkeepthreads=5 |minarchthreads=1 |format= %%i}} | |||
| == DRN notice == | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| There is a discussion involving you at the ]. Regards, ] (]) 14:11, 31 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| | age=2160 | |||
| | archiveprefix=User talk:Darouet/Archive | |||
| | numberstart=1 | |||
| | maxarchsize=75000 | |||
| | header={{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| | minkeepthreads=5 | |||
| | minarchthreads=1 | |||
| | format= %%i | |||
| }} | |||
| == Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment == | |||
| == Request by EricHaim == | |||
| ]Your feedback is requested  at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 12:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Darouet, I would like to discuss your removal of the edits I made to the page "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012." I agree that the edit lacks citations which I am happy to add. There are only two that are critcal, (1) the text of the law itself and (2) the text of the Authorization for Use of Force on which it is predicated. My edit is almost purely factual and my other comments, such as noting that certain important terms are undefined and some potential implications are worded in a manner so as to intentionally not slant the edits towards my point of view which is critical of much of Sub-section D. I can try again and weave parts of what you put back into the edits, add cites, etc. However, the text you put does not appear to be accurate in critical respects. If I am wrong, I welcome being enlightened about. The text as it now stands includes in the overview the following: | |||
| "the Act legislatively codifies the President's authority to indefinitely detain terrorism suspects, including American citizens, without trial as defined in Title X, Subtitle D, SEC 1021(a-e) of the bill. Because those who may be held indefinitely include U.S. citizens arrested on American soil, and because that detention may be by the military, the Act has received critical attention by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and media sources." | |||
| Most important, where in the Act does it provide for the indefinite detention of American citizens? How can the statement that it does be reconciled with the 1021(e) which provides that “othing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” | |||
| There are other points we can discuss. I note that there are extensive quotations and references to the actual provisions of the Act in my edits, whereas what you put back uses loose language like "terrorism suspects" which does not appear in the law or accurately summarize any of its provisions. The edited version while it certainly can be improved does not contain any inaccuracies that I am aware of and is therefore a significant improvement over what you put back which contains demonstrable inaccuracies. I would like to try to collaborate with you on improving this page if you are interested. Your gratuitous comment that I turned the article into a "sounding board for the State Department" is troubling and makes me question your objectivity and attitude. I only contributed to this article because I believe it is important that people have access to accurate information about legal provisions that threaten fundamental rights. Your statement about the State Department is tendentious and at least a little bizzare. Please respond. ] (]) 18:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)). EricHaim. | |||
| : Hi ]; thanks for your note. Please make a new heading in the ] and write, or paste what you've written above, into that section so that we can discuss your proposed edits with other editors. Briefly, a good deal of your concerns above are explicitly addressed in the references provided in the article itself. Nevertheless I think you are correct in some of your points (e.g. 1021.e) and I look forward to your contributions to the article. -] (]) 22:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Darouet - thank you for your response. I am a new contributor and don't know many editing features and tools yet. Can you tell me how to make a new heading once I am on the appropriate talk page? With that info, I will do as you suggest. I think the most helpful thing I can do at this point is to also review the existing page and post on the talk page the specific propositions which I believe to be innacurate with explanations and citations that interested editors can review, and also post revised versions of proposed changes to page on the talk page so we can take into account responses to all of that before any further edits are made using the material I am generating. This is a very important topic and it is important that we get it right. As the creator of the page, I definitely would like to work with you to make it an accurate and informative page. I do have some specialized qualifications in this area. I am a practicing lawyer and independent legal scholar and have a J.D. and a Ph.D. in Jurisprudence and Social Policy, both from the University of California at Berkeley. I have been a serious student of Constitutional law, history and theory for over thirty years. If it might be helpful, I would be happy to provide my e-mail address, which I think is available on the site (though I am not sure as I am a newbie) so we can confer directly about any issues we might wish to discuss. Thanks for creating this page. erichaim (] (]) 00:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)). | |||
| P.S. figured out re header. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination == | |||
| == archived discussion, original research and synth == | |||
| ]Your feedback is requested  at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 11:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi - please don't replace all stale over three months discussion. What benefit do youy see in replacing discussions over three months old that you have no intention of further contributing to ? If there is something you specially want to reopen then start a new discussion and link to it. Thanks - ] (]) 17:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I've returned only those discussions that were active as of the past month. -] (]) 19:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi - this cite does not mention Hoare - - and can you please provide an online link to this article ''Lewis, Paul, ''"The Guardian,"'' 19 July 2011.'' or some more details about it. Thanks - ] (]) 20:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service == | |||
| ==Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and review== | |||
| I mainly rated in C because I wasn't sure that I had the expertise to determine whether it covered all angles and because the lead might be regarded as short. I have now reconsidered and rerated it B for WPA.--] (]) 00:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| '''Hi Darouet!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over six months. | |||
| I answered you inquiry about the Dialog belonging in MILHIST. I personally disagree with the article being covered in MILHIST but laissez faire. You need and infobox similar to ] or even simplified such as ]. To progress the article further I would suggest at least getting a map with the associated nations highlight in green. Much Ado, --] (]) 22:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months. | |||
| ] looks better - the introduction is call the lead on Misplaced Pages - please see ]. It does not need references as it is supposed to be a summary of the whole article (so the refs are in the body of the article). I would look at ] as I think the current lead could be expanded to be a better summary. My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way. | |||
| '''You do not need to do anything about this''' - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so: | |||
| I would also look at ] as the headers should follow that. Hope this helps and thanks for your work, ] ''']''' 04:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| # Go to the ]. | |||
| # Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the ] and/or ] headings. | |||
| # Paste {{tlx|1=Frs user|2=Darouet|3=''limit''}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where ''limit'' is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. | |||
| # Publish the page. | |||
| If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above. | |||
| HI, thanks for the note on my talk page. The article looks interesting and it's something I might want to work on. I'm on a wikibreak at the moment and only editing sporadically, but will definitely put it on my watch list and read through the page. ] (]) 14:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks! It would be great to work with you. I'm on a wikibreak of sorts as well, busy with "real" work. But when I come around to working on the Italian Dialogues I'll let you know! -] (]) 18:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on ], or on ]. '''Thank you!''' | |||
| == Re: Quadrilateral Security Dialogue == | |||
| Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 18:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Hi Darouet, | |||
| I'm happy to participate in a review process, though my knowledge of Chinese security issues is not as sound as it should be. Is there anything in particular that requires feedback? Also, could you advise on a timeline, if you have one in mind? ] (]) 02:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| :I'm not the best person to ask to provide the Chinese perspective. I'm capable of doing Chinese-language research, but I can't say I revel in it. I'll aim to provide some more general comments sometime this week.] (]) 22:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Hey, sorry for dropping the ball on this. On a deadline in the real world. Will return to it soon. ] (]) 19:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Myself and several other editors have been trying to piece together the article on ], the Chongqing party chief who recently got dismissed and caused one of the most dramatic 'showdowns' in Chinese politics in recent memory. Would you be so kind as to return the favour and review the article? :) ]+<small>(])</small> 03:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == You're invited! ] == | |||
| {|style="{{divstylegray}}{{border-radius|8px}}" cellpadding="3" | |||
| |- | |||
| |rowspan=3|] | |||
| !colspan=2 style="font-size:150%;"|]<br><br> | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2|The '''New England Wikimedia General Meeting''' will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! | |||
| :Potential topics: | |||
| :* What is a ] and should we work towards one? | |||
| :* Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) | |||
| :* Planning for upcoming coordinated events (], ], ], etc.) | |||
| :* Outreach to universities (]) and cultural institutions (]) | |||
| :* is this summer. | |||
| :* Your ideas! | |||
| |- | |||
| |align=center| | |||
| :'''Sunday, April 22''' | |||
| :'''1:30 PM – 4:30 PM''' | |||
| |align=center| | |||
| :'', Johnson Building,'' | |||
| :''']—Central Library''' | |||
| : | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center|'''Please sign up here: ]!''' | |||
| |} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>Message delivered by ] at 09:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: <small>You can remove your name from this meetup invite list ].</small></small> | |||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 --> | |||
| ==Happy 2025== | |||
| == Your Abu Qatada edit == | |||
| <!-- ] 17:15, 8 June 2041 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|2254324543}} | |||
| Happy New Year! Hope you are well. You are missed round here. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#4682B4 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#4682B4 -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#000000">]— ]</span> 22:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Quite right. Thank you, appreciated. | |||
| @Truthkeeper above. Surprised to find you here. Any chance of you losing that '88' at the end of your monniker? We could love you loads and loads more if you do :). ] (]) 18:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :This is super trivial, more a clarification. I dequoted and chopped out the mention of the BBC, since it would be clear from the reference, in order to perform a minor space-saver. Either way, the 'weasel words' are still present, only now quoted and the source cited in the text. Is that standard in Misplaced Pages, as your edit comment suggested, when weasels 'cannot' be avoided? Best etc. ~ ] (]) 08:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Help with NDAA 2012 request == | |||
| Hi Darouet, | |||
| I noticed you have been helping with the ] article. I wonder if you could take a look at . I added the Administration's response to the Hedges lawsuit and subsequent blockage of indefinite detention by Judge Forrest. I used direct quotes from the official response. My edits were replaced by someone's interpretation of the response, without any ref source, so I am left to assume this is someone's personal interpretation. That doesn't seem to be in alignment with how Misplaced Pages works, though I haven't much experience here. I added a citation needed tag, but it seems like the statement needs to be removed altogether. Thank you for your help, in advance. ]]] 21:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi again. I completely understand your request. However, I don't think I am well versed enough in Misplaced Pages and with legal cases in general to take this on. The NDAA 2012 has been a real challenge to understand, even for those with law degrees. That seems intentional. The Admin's response to Forrest has not been reviewed by any reputable secondary source. Perhaps it's best to wait until media catches up with this story, and go from there. At some point in the near future, I will certainly move the bulk of the Forrest case to the body of the article. Thanks again for your help.]]] 22:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Scratch that. I went ahead and moved the section, removing the unsourced opinion.]]] 23:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| NYT has covered Judge Forrest's block and subsequent actions by POTUS ~ thought you might appreciate ]. ]]] 21:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Hmm, thanks for the fascinating article: Charlie Savage has written consistently well on some of the legal aspects of the war on terror. I'll try to stay more in the loop on this. -] (]) 21:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are most welcome. I know it's hard to keep up, if I come across other succinct articles to keep you updated, I'll go ahead and leave them here.]]] 22:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ''You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard'' == | |||
| {| style="{{Divbox/style/blue}}{{border-radius|8px}}" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! colspan="2" style="font-size: 150%;" | U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - ''You are invited!'' <br /> | |||
| |- | |||
| | <div style="background: #fff;margin-right: 10px;">]</div> | |||
| | style="text-align: center;" | Now in its fourth year, ] is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (]), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at ] to edit and create Misplaced Pages entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.<br/> Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit ] to do either. <small><br/>00:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0376 --> | |||
| == Disposition Matrix == | |||
| Thank you for creating the ] article! I hope you will continue with your great work on it as more information becomes known. ] (]) 14:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Came here to say the same thing. Surprised that there wasn't an 'Obama kill list' article previously. Thank you! ] ] (]) 05:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks you both! And please feel free to contribute if you find interesting analysis online. -] (]) 13:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK nomination for ] == | |||
| Hi. I've nominated ], an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the ] as part of ]. You can see the hook for the article ], where you can improve it if you see fit. '']'' <sup>]</sup> 20:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)<!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DYKNom|Article name}} --> | |||
| == November 2012 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a ]. Your recent edit to ] seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> ''Wiki article states subject was legally hung. Whether it is an example of bigotry or not, it certainly wasn't a lynching.'' ] (]) 18:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks ] for your polite note. Please realize that my edit conveyed the fact that Roy Mitchell was hanged, not lynched. I didn't confuse this fact and actually wrote the article on Mitchell. I apologize, however, for the poor wording on my part (I was trying to be concise). Also, I should have provided a source. Am rectifying my errors now. Cheers. -] (]) 20:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::BTW, thanks for writing the article on Mitchell. Very interesting to me since I worked on the Jesse Washington article. I've been meaning to sit down and take a look through it. ] (]) 19:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Duggan == | |||
| Hi Darouet! Sorry I took a while to respond. I share your concerns with the introduction of the article subject's race in the first sentence. Although race is directly related to the notability of the subject, I prefer for that kind of detail to be later in the introductory paragraph. First sentences are ''definitional'' and I don't like to 'define' people by their race. To me it currently reads more like a newspaper article intro than an encyclopedia one. Here's a suggested change: | |||
| :'''Mark Duggan''', a 29 year-old Tottenham resident, was shot and killed by police in Tottenham, North East London, England on 4 August 2011. The Metropolitan Police stated that officers were attempting to arrest Duggan on suspicion of planning an attack, and that he was in possession of a handgun. Duggan died from a gunshot wound to the chest. Public protest broke out in Tottenham over the circumstances of his death, motivated by suspicions that Dugan--a black male--was targeted by the police because of his race. The protests escalated into widespread riots, looting and arson in London and elsewhere. | |||
| Maybe you could suggest that and get some feedback? I do think his race is relevant to his life and death, but perhaps mentioning it later in the introduction would settle some of your concerns. Cheers! ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 14:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Disposition Matrix== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' creates a blueprint for tracking, capturing, ] or killing suspected terrorists?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Disposition Matrix|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Disposition Matrix|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (]) 00:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| :Thank you <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#4682B4 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#4682B4 -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#000000">]— ]</span> ; "real life" has been busy! Hope I can get back to helping sometimes. Happy New Year to you too, and thanks for all you do here! -] (]) 03:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for the article "Domestic Security Alliance Council" that you created! ] (]) 17:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:31, 8 January 2025
Hi Darouet, welcome to Misplaced Pages! -Thucydides411 (talk) 02:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 Archives (index) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Myrmecophyte on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Darouet! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over six months.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{Frs user|Darouet|limit}}underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Happy 2025
Happy New Year! Hope you are well. You are missed round here. Cambial — foliar❧ 22:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Cambial — foliar❧ ; "real life" has been busy! Hope I can get back to helping sometimes. Happy New Year to you too, and thanks for all you do here! -Darouet (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)