| Revision as of 09:06, 15 January 2013 editGuitar hero on the roof (talk | contribs)439 edits →Help needed← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:19, 9 January 2025 edit undoRedrose64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators273,170 edits →Happy Holidays!: fix markup left unclosed by A.S. Brown | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| <center> | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| {| style="border: 5px solid #584010; padding: .25em; background-color: #e0e0a0; color:#584010" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |rowspan="2" | | ||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. ] (]) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == A beer for you! == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid purple; background-color: purple;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''''The Purple Heart Barnstar''''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Za całokształt.<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 20:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |}</center> | |||
| <br> | |||
| == Your HighBeam account is ready! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Misplaced Pages email address. | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. ] (]) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| **Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in ]). | |||
| |} | |||
| **If you did not receive a code but were on the ], add your name to ] and we'll try again. | |||
| * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code. | |||
| * To activate your account: 1) Go to ; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive. | |||
| * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to ], or ask ]. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration. | |||
| * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate | |||
| * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at ] | |||
| * Show off your HighBeam access by placing <nowiki>{{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}}</nowiki> on your userpage | |||
| * When the 1-year period is up, check ] to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be. | |||
| Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 21:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0256 --> | |||
| :Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! ] (]) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Eustachy Trepka== | |||
| :<nowiki>*</nowiki>hic* here's another :) sláinte! ]]] 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = {{#switch: {{Currentdaymonth}} | 31 October = ] | ]}} | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''', ''']''', and ''']''' were early Polish ] who translated the ], works of ], and other religious texts while working in ] (Königsberg) in the 16th century?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Eustachy Trepka|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Eustachy Trepka|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (]) 08:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Stanisław Murzynowski== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = {{#switch: {{Currentdaymonth}} | 31 October = ] | ]}} | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''', ''']''', and ''']''' were early Polish ] who translated the ], works of ], and other religious texts while working in ] (Königsberg) in the 16th century?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Stanisław Murzynowski|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Stanisław Murzynowski|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (]) 08:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| ==DYK for Hieronim Malecki== | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A Resilient Barnstar''' | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |- | |||
| |small = | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! ''']] (])''' 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |image = {{#switch: {{Currentdaymonth}} | 31 October = ] | ]}} | |||
| |} | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''', ''']''', and ''']''' were early Polish ] who translated the ], works of ], and other religious texts while working in ] (Königsberg) in the 16th century?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hieronim Malecki|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hieronim Malecki|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (]) 08:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== A kitten for you! == | ||
| ] | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening. | |||
| <small>] <small><sup>Need help? ''']'''</sup></small></small> 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| == Glitch == | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. ] (]) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| :Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| == Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page == | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:. | |||
| ==Thank you!== | |||
| Thank you for great copy editing. ] (]) 14:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure, no problem and I'll keep an eye on it as you keep working. Be sure to DYK it.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 21:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Then it will need more work. Thanks, ] (]) 23:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)] (]) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Yup == | |||
| == YGM == | |||
| ], quite right, obviously intended to push a POV. I may get to it another time, but right now I don't have the time or the spoons to deal with that AfD, given Misplaced Pages's own Muslims Are Evil machine. Dealing with the deliberate ignoring of policy becomes very tiresome. –] (] ⋅ ]) 07:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(she|they|xe)</small> 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Just wanted to note that the article I tagged is ], not "of", though it looks like the other article might have some issues as well.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ::Whoops. I meant the one you tagged, typo on my part. –] (] ⋅ ]) 18:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == What do you mean OR? == | |||
| :Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| The reader that can see the clarication of the text. Or it is the truth which sombody does not like to be exposed? Please live this as it was without unnecessary editor war. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:40, 5 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == |
== File:AECases2020.png == | ||
| Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{tl|db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука<sup>]</sup> 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ]. Definitely needs more work. He was described as a "maverick" by one political scientist and his politics are not easy to peg. ] (]) 21:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Sockpuppet accusations == | |||
| Reminds you of anything? :/ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| If you think that I am someone else's sockpuppet account, I think the correct venue for bringing it up is ]. That way the discussion on the article talk page can stay focused on content. ] (]) 22:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Lol.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Um... I hope my ping at ] didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing {{u|FeydHuxtable}} write {{tq|Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).}} bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a ]? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. ] ] 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| == Battle of Gniew/Mewe == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| What's your opinion on this battle? Was it a Swedish victory or inconclusive? According to ALL Swedish and English sources I could find it's a "significant Swedish victory". The reason I'm asking you for help is that this guy "89.231.29.36" claims it to have been inc according to Polish historian Radosław Sikora. Also, he ignores Swedish sources on Swedish casualties which I find to be the most accurate ones (since Sweden also held the field); sources become more reliable if one side actually got the time to count bodies etc. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I opened up the talk page on "battle of Gniew" if you would like to give your opinion there. ] (]) 11:26, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :Generally speaking I really dislike these arguments about battle outcomes since for vast majority of battles it's essentially a judgement call. A lot of them are "inconclusive" for some semi-reasonable definition of "inconclusive". Here, looking over the sources you've assembled I think there's enough justification to call it a "Swedish victory".<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:28, 11 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ::I answered your concern according to the ]. There's a possible source in one of the links. I feel this article needs some numbers on strenght and a little information which I may be able to add if I know there's a reliable source somewhere. ] (]) 22:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Editor experience invitation == | |||
| ::Replied on talk there. It looks like three battles in more or less the same area.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 00:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Polish- Soviet War == | |||
| == Thanks for the hat-tip == | |||
| I don't quite understand why you undid my change. Polish- Soviet war was a fight for the very existance of Poland, not about Belarus and Ukraine. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, ] (]) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, it was actually both. It started out as a fight over where the border between newly independent Poland and newly revolutionary Russia was going to be - i.e. about the territory of present day Ukraine and Belarus. But it did develop into a "fight for the very existence of Poland". Perhaps that sentence should be modified to include both aspects.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| == The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal == | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | {{#ifeq:Current Events Barnstar|alt|]|]}} | |||
| {| style="border: 5px solid #584010; padding: .25em; background-color: #e0e0a0; color:#584010" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |rowspan="2" | | ||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Current Events Barnstar''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: |
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | nice catch on the map ] (]) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Unsourced contributions == | |||
| * Ticking off your contributions medal also at ]. All best. ] ] 10:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at ] and ] , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ] (]) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 21:35, 14 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Happy New Year == | ||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FDEE00;" | |||
| For helping out with the ] GA review. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 00:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | ''']!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. ] (]) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ], the author of ''''']''''', was placed in the ] for writing "]" in quotation marks in a social media post?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == The mention at ANI == | |||
| I am surprised you haven't voiced your opinion there yet :) --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 16:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either ] (]) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for pointing it out. Right now I have very mixed feelings about the specific proposal.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Request for amendment at ] about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland == | |||
| == You == | |||
| Are obviously being goaded and are walking into a block with open arms. I have removed your claim of outing Please calm down and go have a nice cup of tea. ] (]) 19:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Volunteer Marek, | |||
| :If I'm being goaded, which is probably true, then shouldn't the goader be the one getting the block? I'm gonna drop it for now, and let things settle, but this is very obviously intentional WP:HARASSMENT.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::As that user has now posted a link to an external website I have brought the issue to ANI. ] (]) 19:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| a request for amendment that affects the {{tqq|1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek}} from the ] has been made at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_World_War_II_and_the_history_of_Jews_in_Poland}}. Your input would be welcome. | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 28== | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| == Threading == | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
| This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. ]. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, ] (]) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| == Utsa Patnaik == | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 01:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of ] on the ] article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. ] (]) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Question== | |||
| :Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes == | |||
| I saw a comment on AN that you had asked me not to use your former username back in March. Is that the case, and do you have a diff for it? If it's true, then I apologise profusely - I have absolutely no recollection of that request or the context in which you made it. ] (]) 19:02, 29 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :The diffs are out there, I don't feel like looking for them right now. Anyway, apology accepted. Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| == Fahrenheit == | |||
| {{ivmbox|] (the topic and interaction bans on ], respectively) are repealed.}} | |||
| And it has resolved by another ] that: | |||
| {{ivmbox|]' ] from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under ], is repealed.}} | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes}}'''<!-- ] (]) 06:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | |||
| === Arbitration amendment request archived === | |||
| Hey, i would like to know why you deleted the words "Dutch German-born" in the article "Fahrenheit". The "Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit" article states that he was German, and that the "Britannica" says so. So why didn't you alter "Dutch German-born" to "German-born" or just "German", but deleted it all? Regards, David ] (]) 12:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at ]. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. ] ] 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre == | |||
| :Take a look at the talk page. Most sources actually call him "Dutch-Polish" rather than German. Some anon ip's been monkeying around with the info.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Articles for discussion page''' ] (]) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Ah yes ok, it seems to be disputed. A good solution in such cases is mentioning the language: "a German-speaking physicist, engineer and glass blower born in Gdańsk (German: Danzig), which was then part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" for the Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit article, and "German-speaking" for the Fahrenheit article. Do you want to insert that? ] (]) 14:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| :The thing is, the source actually given calls him "Polish-born Dutch", with no mention of any German speaking. Yes, there are other source which call him German but even there it's generally either or even . Going into explanations of where each one of those comes from is too much detail for the lede and borders on OR. Just stick with sources. | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| :In the Fahrenheit article I would simply omit any mention of nationality since it doesn't matter.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| But there are other informations on the page which say something else. Actually it would be better to write "German-speaking physicist born in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth". This gives more information and is more useful than "Dutch-German-Polish". And there is no reason not to include "German-speaking physicist" in the "Fahrenheit" article. The fact that he can apparently only be described as "Dutch-German-Polish" makes the usage of the expression "German-speaking" even more useful. By simply writing that he was a "German-speaking physicist born in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth", and later mentioning that he moved to the Netherlands this "Dutch-German-Polish" thing can be omited. ] (]) 21:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| == Wikipedians == | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| You joined the ], which is being discussed at ]. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| You may wish to join the category ]. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 10:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Renaming your user essays == | |||
| </div> | |||
| May I suggest moving ] and ] to something that looks better in the category view in user essays? Also, why did you remove links to those from your userpage, it took me a while too find them again. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 17:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Thank You == | |||
| ==Incomplete DYK nomination== | |||
| Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. ] (]) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ''']''' at the ] is not complete; see ]. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{tl|db-g7}}, or ask a ]. Thank you. <!--Template:DYK nomination needs transcluded--> ] (]) 05:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Io Saturnalia!== | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for November 6== | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
| ::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Fractional reserve banking protection == | |||
| Hi Volunteer Marek. This is just to let you know that I your request at ], as it was duplicating a request further down the page. I've semi-protected ] for one week - hopefully that should take some of the burden off. Best — ''''']''''' <sup>(])</sup> 13:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, I looked at ], but I don't think it really needs protecting yet. The disruption you describe is only being caused by one IP, so it would be better dealt with by a block than by page protection. Feel free to let me know if the situation changes though. — ''''']''''' <sup>(])</sup> 14:10, 7 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Gleiwitz == | |||
| In your wholseale revision of my edit, you are re-attributing that Hitler, in his Sep 1 speech, stated that "at the same time as the Gleiwitz attack, there were other incidents orchestrated by Germany along the Polish-German border, such as house torching in the Polish Corridor and spurious propaganda output. The entire project, dubbed ] and comprising 21 incidents in all." This is not factual, check his speech, so re-adding that cite to support those words about Op Himmler is problematic. | |||
| :Clearer - attributing the fact that the attacks were orchestrated by the Germans and the fact that Operation Himmler comprised of twenty-one incidents to Hitlers speech is obviously invalid, either the cite should be removed, or the text couched differently. | |||
| I re-ordered the two other cites as that is the order they do confirm the text. | |||
| :Further - I see now that the cite I moved for the 1st September speech (on the day of the invasion) is attributing the text "For months before the 1939 invasion..." - again it should be removed, or the text couched differently. | |||
| I quoted direct from the speech as nowhere in his speech does Hitler actually use the words "defensive" or state they are using defensive actions he states clearly that they are repaying (whether true or not) Polish actions, like for like and will continue to do so. | |||
| :Further - Hitler continues, stating/propagandizing that bomb will be met with by bomb, gas for gas, "until the safety of the Reich and its rights are secured". The word "defensive" used in such a way is unscholarly (employing sarcasm): Hitler's aims at expanding the Reich are clear and stated in that very speech - as he sees it "restoring German sovereignty over German territories". Another solution would be to drop the word entirely and have instead of "as justification for Germany's "defensive" action against Poland" simply "as justification for Germany's invasion of Poland." | |||
| The article is very short, these sorts of clarifications are not problematic. | |||
| FYI I was formerly an admin, with two FAs and some few DYK articles to my credit, and would appreciate more than a hand wave of "the paraphrase is perfectly fine. It says 21 incidents right there" to re-insert the above stated problems in your wish not to include an actual quote rather than any paraphrase.--] (]) 21:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, I don't think having the entire quote from Hitler there is very useful - it's better to summarize it. If your objection is to the number 21, then I've removed it. Personally I do think the word "defensive" is implied in the quote but if it really bothers you then perhaps leaving it out would be ok. The fact that the attacks were orchestrated by the Germans is pretty solid though, right? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 01:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :More generally I would prefer to see a secondary source here rather than either a (Wikipedian's) description of a primary source or a direct quote from a primary source.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 01:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the edits to the article, that does help, though the speech cite still needlessly supports ''events leading up to it'' - second para, Context section. It'll be no great loss. | |||
| ::There are lots of things from various sides that could be used as quotes, choosing which ones to ex/in-clude certainly has its issues - I'm not mindful about that provided we, without any "slant", just relay the bare info from the primary sources. As to the solidity, are you asking me personally or encyclopedic-wise? There might be slightly different answers involved :) ] (]) 02:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Talk:Financial crisis of 2007–2008|Requested move: Recession of 2007–2009|ts=18:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| Please comment. ] (]) 18:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Pomerelia== | |||
| Hi, the article says "In 1210, king Valdemar II of Denmark invaded Pomerelia, whose princeps Mestwin I became his vassal. Pomerelia regained independence from the Danes in 1227." - I think that the sentence is erroneous. | |||
| Mestwin I in May 1212 he participated in the great congress Polish dukes and the Polish episcopate in Mąkolin (according to article "Mściwój I gdański" in Polish wikipedia) and dependence on Denmark ended in 1211. What do you think about it?] (]) 16:22, 10 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Borzęcin, Lesser Poland Voivodeship== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the village of ''']''' was first mentioned in historical documents by the Polish chronicler ] in his ]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Borzęcin, Lesser Poland Voivodeship|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Borzęcin, Lesser Poland Voivodeship|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (]) 08:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Responded to your concerns.--] (]) 19:14, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :At your convenience, could you do 2 additional article Reviews in addition to ] Thanks.--] (]) 20:11, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: '''Thanks.''' I think the list you did is an excellent idea!--] (]) 21:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::: My understanding is that ONLY 1 article ''Review'' of a hook is required even for a multiple article hook. Is that right?--] (]) 23:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm not sure myself actually. Also, this 30-in-1 nom is a bit unprecedented so I don't know if we can apply usual practice to it. But I think other editors have volunteered to do some reviewing to satisfy the requirement.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 23:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Advice Re: admin decisions == | |||
| I have only been editing for a month. I ran across the article ] in the course of exploring visual art topics, and nominated it for speedy deletion as nonsense. This was was denied without reasonable explanation, but a suggestion that I improve the article with research. Now the article is on the AfD list. This is certainly confusing to the novice, since merely pointing out that the article was self-contradictory and unreferenced should qualify it as nonsense. I see my role as adding needed content as someone familiar with the visual arts, but does that mean not getting involved in cleanup, which is an admin function?] (]) 05:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Speedy deletion is for stuff that it's pretty obvious no one's gonna object to deleting. Here apparently there was some concern that someone might object. But I agree that the article is non-encyclopedic, which is why I nominated it for deletion. And even as non-admin you can express your opinion at the AfD, or even nominate articles for deletion yourself (provided the rationale is good). In fact, I'd encourage you to comment at the AfD (accessible via the big banner on top of that article), since you wanted to speedy it.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == My initations to Rsloch == | |||
| I think also Rsloch has pro-German no objective attitude. My friend entered table on article 'Silesia' and he reverting it without any argumentation. I attempt to invite him to argumentations (you can see my notices on his talk page). I am afraid he will not leasing to the invitations.--] (]) 02:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Ostra Brama == | |||
| :I never know that wikipedia have a policy of delete sourced information. You can add other reliable info to counter mine, but delete my info is out of question. Don't play the censoring game in this encyclopedia. Misplaced Pages is not a propanganda machine of CIA or MI6, mate. ] (]) 17:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::You know, when you start throwing around accusations about CIA or MI6 propaganda, it's a pretty clear sign that you're POV pushing. A 1946 book entitled "Great Conspiracy: Secret War Against Russia" is simply NOT a reliable source. This is not "censorship" (a word which doesn't make sense in a context of an encyclopedia anyway), it's simply Misplaced Pages policy. | |||
| ::Also, you're not 'adding' info, you're completely changing the text.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| #First, any adding or deleting can be regarding as changing the text. | |||
| #Second, you say it is not reliable but I say it is. In wikipedia, it is not about right or wrong, it is about verifiable. | |||
| #Third, if you say that I am POV, then add your own reliable source to counter mine. Deleting mine is out of question. | |||
| #Fourth, you say that I am pushing POV but I say that you and some other users are also doing the same. | |||
| Clear enough, mr "Soviet is evil" ? ] (]) 00:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::Refrain from calling me names. | |||
| :::Look, it's simply not a reliable source. Read ] and ]. You can ask at ] as well. | |||
| :::<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 01:32, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| *I was waiting if anyone will actually use the "The Great Conspiracy. The Secret War against Soviet Russia", and . Wow! That is one I actually read in Russian. This is like using ] for sourcing. We are moving back in time not only to Soviet Brezhnev time propaganda, but to old time Stalinist propaganda. ] (]) 06:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::You're quite correct. The truth is, though, that Brezhnev era sources are widely being used, e.g. many ] authors . We should discard those, too, I think. ] ] 10:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::This is not Russian versus Polish sources, but WP:RS versus ]. Actually, the "Conspiracy" book was written by two Western conspiracy theorists to prove that victims of Stalinist show trials were real "enemy of the people". There are other books of same variety, such as "Moscow, 1938" by ], which is possibly a good source on ideological subversion of writers, but not about anything else. ] (]) 13:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, I know that it's pro-Stalinist refuse. It's available :)] ] 13:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry if my words are vandalism or hurt you, but it seems to be that many enwiki users forget about how wikipedia maintains its '''neutrality'''. Misplaced Pages keeps its neutrality not by delete selected information because of Soviet this, Soviet that. It preserve that neutrality by accepting and expressing many points of view together. So if you see some articles are too POV, the only good thing to do is add verifiable sources from the other points of view to restore the balance, not by deleting the sources. Deleting like that is not making wikipedia more neutral. It is '''CENSORSHIP'''. To be frankly, I am sick of some users using the agrument "Soviet this, Soviet that" and delete the information, even if the sources are taken from reliable sources such as Russian Archive Agency (Russian, not Soviet). I used to think En.wiki is the most neutral wikipedia version because English users can be the citizens of many different countries, but now I am gradually believing that it is merely a propaganda machine of CIA and the anti-Soviet powers. ] (]) 14:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I think what you are talking about is anti-Soviet Soviet propaganda: Советская коммунистическая пропаганда, потеряв ориентиры, постепенно смыкается с антикоммунистической и антисоветской. Например, антисоветская пропаганда утверждает, что советским государством со времени его возникновения правили одни преступники. Советская пропаганда утверждает почти то же самое. Десятки высших руководителей государства от Троцкого до Хрущева объявлены и до сих пор считаются врагами народа, зонтами империализма и иностранных разведок, в лучшем случае, антипартийными фракционерами и волюнтаристами. И антисоветская, и советская пропаганда утверждают, что никакого социализма с человеческим лицом нет и не может быть. (see ). ] (]) 03:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Information== | |||
| I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: ] Thank you for considering this request. ] (]) 10:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Casimir Pulaski== | |||
| Hey. I did a quick check on Pulaski: ''American Heritage'', ''Columbia'', ''Encarta'' and ''Oxford Dictionaries'' use the anglicized name (''Casimir Pulaski''), while ''Britannica'', ''Chambers'' and ''Webster's'' use the native one (''Kazimierz Pułaski''). I didn't find entries from the other major reference works. ] (]) 23:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I'd be interested in your thoughts there; I've posted mine at ]. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 18:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == David Irving == | |||
| I removed "holocaust denier" from the introductory sentence of David Irving, but you (and someone else) seem to have a problem with this. | |||
| I thought that the purpose of the introductory sentence was to name them, and to list what occupation they do/did. Is this not correct? All other people seem to have their occupation there, rather than things they're known to be linked to. | |||
| Is there perhaps a guide somewhere explaining it? Thank you. | |||
| == Edit summary == | |||
| In your recent edit to ], your edit summary states "been over this several times". However, I do not find any discussion by you on the talk page. Please remember that edit summaries are ''not'' intended for communicating with other editors, only for describing your edits. Please use the article talk page for discussion, new-to-the-article editors should not have to search edit summaries for your contributions to a discussion, and are quite justified in simply ignoring any input which has been communicated in this manner, where it cannot be readily seen as part of the discussion. Thank you. ] (]) 00:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :The only discussion on the talk page is exactly about this issue, hence I'm at a completely loss as to how you managed to miss that. And skip the lectures please, I've been here way longer than you.<span style="color:Blue">Volunteer</span><span style="color:Orange">Marek</span> 04:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Check your e-mail. ] (]) 04:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::VM, my point is that ''you'' did not engage in discussion, and that the discussion is about the ''text'', not the image. And I note that you continue to use edit summaries to address people, which is simply not proper. In fact, it's quite rude. ] (]) 05:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Is it? What makes you think so? I do it at least once a week. (Maybe I'm rude...?) --] (]) 10:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Re maps in the article on Poland. == | |||
| Hello Volunteer Marek. I have noticed your activity in many of the Poland-related threads. I have put a request to add a map of the early Polish state (10th/11th cent), but it was rejected (http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Poland#Edit_request_on_10_December_2012_.28Map_of_Poland_in_10th.2F11th_century.29) | |||
| Don't you think that such map would be worth including (given the reasons outlined by myself in that edit request)? | |||
| ] (]) 12:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Ełk Lake == | |||
| Thanks for your help on the translation. Much appreciated. ] (]) 17:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Signature == | |||
| Hi, not sure if it's a bug but your signature doesn't currently contain a link per ]. Cheers. ] (]) 08:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, thanks for pointing it out. I think it should be good now: <span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 21:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| What's your thought on this discussion? I might have been too harsh, but the bureaucratic argument annoyed me a bit. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 19:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Careless editing == | |||
| Please be more careful when editing. Your reversion at ] restored a circular redirect that was previously removed and "Shepreviously" is not a word. As for primary sources, it is quite acceptable to use ]. Regarding the image, it is not possible to obtain a free equivalent of the cast photo. In any case, this would require turning the article into an image farm. --<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#fee72c 0em 0em 0.8em,gold -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">] (])</font> 06:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Even if there were minor mistakes in the previous version that does not justify the extensive ] in the article. If you're bothered by the circular redirect and "Shepreviously" then remove the circular redirect and put a space between "She" and "previously", rather than doing a blanket revert. And no, primary sources are generally NOT acceptable, except in some special cases because they lead to original research. This is what's happening here. | |||
| :And the image does not justify fair use for several reasons.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 08:22, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::There's no OR in the section that you removed, when you added the mistakes mentioned above. I suggest you review ] to find out what constitutes OR. All content is easily verifiable; television episodes are acceptable primary sources - this has been tested many times and I suggest you read ], which references ]. Whomever added the text originally has come to the same conclusion I did when I've watched the episodes, there has been no analysis, just a clear statement of what has occurred (ad nauseam) in the episodes. As for the image, that it was "uploaded by indef banned user" is completely irrelevant. The editor was blocked only 4 days ago, the block had nothing to do with the image and he hasn't edited the article in months. --<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#fee72c 0em 0em 0.8em,gold -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">] (])</font> 08:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::No, that text is OR consisting of the writer's opinions and gossip. Note that I'm not the only one who noticed this, as another user tried to remove the text before but apparently gave up in the face of your obstinacy. As to the image, it fails fair use for several reasons, none of which are that it was uploaded by a banned user - though that doesn't help either.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 16:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Absolutely incorrect. Have you ever actually watched the program? What is written is effectively a direct statement of what occurs in the program, including the "confession cam" videos provided by the mothers and dancers. There's no OR at all and you haven't demonstrated that any of it is incorrect. Everything is verifiable, in accordance with ]. The original version did contain some stuff that shouldn't be there because it was really irrelevant to the series and the twitter claim was unsorced but everything else is fine. That another editor claimed something doesn't prove he was right, it just proves that he hasn't bothered to verify the content, as he should have. Since we're having a dispute over content, we should be following ] and is at best as, when there is a dispute over content the ] reigns. Unfortuately, is the status quo, not the cleaned up version. Please do not continue to edi-war over this, but instead continue to discuss it on the article's talk page. --<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#fee72c 0em 0em 0.8em,gold -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">] (])</font> 20:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Do not remove valid refferences == | |||
| You deleted a reference to ] (1890) from ] saying it was too old. Apparently you are not a student of economic history. This is one of the most important economic works of the period and is often cited. According to your reasoning Adam Smith references shouldn't be allowed either. Please do not delete references unless you have read enough of them to know whether or not they are appropriate. Use the Talk page or use a tag calling for more references if one is inadequate.] (]) 13:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Adam Smith should not be used as a reference either, except for opinions of Adam Smith. See ]. A reference from 1890, used to support a potentially controversial claim, is too old.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 16:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Wrong. This is not a "potentially controversial claim". It is so widely accepted that a reference isn't even needed.] (]) 19:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't think so. The source comes from the time before the advent of quantitative methods in economic history. More recent research has quantified and revised a lot of the claims concerning where the actual productivity increases occurred. For example, way back in the 1960's already, ] showed that the non-quantitative assessments of railroads' contribution to economic growth were very exaggerated (]). More generally, I really dislike the phrasing '''"Great sources of productivity improvement..."''. What exactly is a "great source" of a productivity improvement? Like a really spiffy source? At the very least shouldn't it be something like ''"Some sources of great productivity improvements..."''. That's just bad writing. Also, what exactly does the word "great" mean there? How much? 10%? 15% 1000000%? <span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 19:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :And by the way, the correct insult should not be ''"Apparently you are not a student of ]"'' but rather ''"Apparently you are not a student of ]"''.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 16:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::According to Misplaced Pages policy: <blockquote>"primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Misplaced Pages; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them"</blockquote> This source has been reliably published (it was widely read at the time and is still available in modern reprints) and the whole point of the book is that the cited productivity changes, price decreases and improvements in living standards, which are explicitly described in the book, are the main theme of the book. This is without question. One secondary source who cites ''Recent Economic Changes'' is Carlota Perez, but I remember seeing others.] (]) 19:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::The point is that this might be a potential primary source for what people thought in 1890's. It's not really a reliable source concerning what actually happened during the Industrial Revolution since it has been potentially supplemented or revised by subsequent research. If newer research agrees with Wells, then it shouldn't be that difficult to cite modern research. If it doesn't, then it should be modern research that is used, not stuff that's more than a century old.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 19:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Unless you have read Wells (apparently not from your uninformed comments) you have no idea how this source relates to the appropriateness of the reference. Yes there are other more modern sources, people such as Milton Friedman, Anna Schwartz, Murray Rothbard, David Landes | |||
| read sources like Wells, but none of these people are as reliable as Wells. Why? Because wells was the leading authority on technology in the U.S. at the time.] (]) 04:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::No, I haven't read Wells. That doesn't change the fact that we should not use a source from the 1890's. I don't understand your logic regarding Friedman and others, bringing them up appears to be a red herring.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 05:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't understand your logic about a source being too old. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.] (]) 17:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :A red herring? What the hell? Are you into conspiracy theories? WTF is the matter with people?] (]) 15:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| So you haven't read the source but you are going to judge whether it's appropriate? I keep a list of my sources with hundreds of pages of notes on this subject and use the most appropriate ones.] (]) | |||
| The economists and historians only know half the story. I don't trust them for the technical part, especially because they didn't see it happening in person.] (]) 13:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Liberals love revisionist history.] (]) 13:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :The source is from 1890. We should use modern sources. I don't really care whom you trust or not and I have no idea what liberals have to do with anything. That's a strange remark.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 19:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you or anyone else has modern sources then add them, but do not take out valid sources. That's rude!] (]) 03:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Rudeness has nothing to do with it. It's simply not very good practice, or very encyclopedic, to use sources more than a century old to cite facts.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 08:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Bali ultimate == | |||
| I don't understand how AE works. Is done and dusted? --] (]) 15:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Sikora == | |||
| To jest praca doktorska Radosława Sikory. | |||
| Pozdrawiam!] (]) 04:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for January 9== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added links pointing to ], ], ] and ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of Dispute resolution discussion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | |||
| {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;" | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| | style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" | | |||
| |} | |||
| {{collapse top|bg=#cae1ff|bg2=#f0f8ff|Guide for participants}} | |||
| ==Happy Holidays!== | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:lightyellow; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]{{Center|]}} | |||
| If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the '''''"Request dispute resolution"''''' button below this guide or go to ] for an easy to follow, step by step request form. | |||
| Wishing you a most happy holidays! --] (]) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| {{center|'''What this noticeboard is:'''}} | |||
| * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after ] discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction. | |||
| {{center|'''What this noticeboard is not:'''}} | |||
| * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about '''article content''', not disputes about '''user conduct'''. | |||
| * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are ] at other ]. | |||
| * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been ] (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN. | |||
| * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy. | |||
| {{center|'''Things to remember:'''}} | |||
| * Discussions should be ], calm, ], ], and objective. Comment only about the article's ''content'', not ]. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. | |||
| * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{tls|drn-notice}} on their user talk page. | |||
| * Sign and date your posts with ] {{nowrap|"<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>"}}. | |||
| * If you ever need any help, ask one of ], who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located ] and on the DR/N talkpage. | |||
| {{collapse bottom}} | |||
| Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 07:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Help needed == | |||
| Hi :-) I hope it's not rude what I'm asking. On the ] page due to a long discussion we came to a conclusion that Einstein should be taken out of the image due to the fact he himself stated that he doesnt see himself as a German and wants nothing to do with it. In another discussion it was decided to put Angela Merkel instead of him. Later we came to a conclusion to put ] instead of Marx. The problem is we need someone who knows how to edit that specific picture used in the infobox. Could you please replace Einstein with Merkel? I saw you replaced someone in the past there, therefore ask for your help. ] (]) 19:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Here are the original discussions: (this one is where the vote took place regarding] and here is the discussion on who to use instead of Einstein: . Here is the discussion who to put instead of Marx: . Just wanted to let you know about the discussion on the Poles page, though with a delay but I understood that Poles was actually written about the nationality to. On the Germans it's different, that's why they came to a different conclusion. ] (]) 19:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Before making any changes to that image I'm gonna wait till the discussion is concluded, which, best as I can tell, hasn't happened yet.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 03:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's a bit more complicated with that page. The discussion regarding Marx and Einstein is concluded, now they are talking about different stuff which is that character of the article. Also, there is a phenomenom of new editors with only one edit in their account coming to try to ster the discussion, we have reason to assume those are sock puppets and ignore them. ] (]) 08:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The discussion on ] about Marx and Einstein has not ended. What has happened is that experienced editors from elsewhere have noticed the previous discussion and are now commenting. None of them are meatpuppets or sockpuppets from what I can tell. ] (]) 08:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The discussion have ended. Just because you and one or two new people jumped in and bring the same arguments which were already answered it doesn’t mean in re-started. That’s the thing, yesterday even people who originally opposed to taking out Einstein and Marx agreed that they should be taken out. PS stalking Wikipedians is actually against the rules. You admitted to doing it to Evildoer187 and now you are doing it to me. ] (]) 09:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:19, 9 January 2025
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
|
I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! Gandydancer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- *hic* here's another :) sláinte! ——SerialNumber54129 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
|
A Resilient Barnstar |
| I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! starship.paint (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening.
HighInBC 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Glitch
Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page
Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:.
There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)Rja13ww33 (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
YGM
No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-09-16/Serendipity
Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:AECases2020.png
Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-11-06/Arbitration report
Reminds you of anything? :/ Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Lol. Volunteer Marek 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).
bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a victim impact statement? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the hat-tip
It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, Risker (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
|
The Current Events Barnstar | |
| nice catch on the map Elinruby (talk) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
Unsourced contributions
Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at Talk:Belarusian nationalism#Nationalists were also opposed by the local intellectuals and User talk:RusHistorian#December 2023 , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year
|
Happy New Year! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street
On 27 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stanislav Aseyev, the author of The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, was placed in the Izolyatsia torture camp for writing "Donetsk People's Republic" in quotation marks in a social media post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Torture Camp on Paradise Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Torture Camp on Paradise Street), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The mention at ANI
can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either Elinruby (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |  |
Request for amendment at WP:ARCA about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
Hello Volunteer Marek,
a request for amendment that affects the 1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek
from the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case has been made at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Your input would be welcome.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Threading
This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. Link for review. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, Mr rnddude (talk) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Utsa Patnaik
Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of Utsa Patnaik on the Bengal Famine of 1943 article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another anonymous user on July 1 added a whole paragraph sourced to Patnaik to the lead about inflation even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. 185.21.22.198 (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source. Volunteer Marek 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) are repealed.
And it has resolved by another motion that:
My very best wishes' topic ban from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under the Eastern Europe contentious topic procedures, is repealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
Arbitration amendment request archived
The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 128#Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. SilverLocust 💬 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre
Gąsawa massacre has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Articles for discussion page Polski Piast from Poland (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Gąsawa massacre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gąsawa massacre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gąsawa massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. 69.61.139.83 (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
Wishing you a most happy holidays! --A.S. Brown (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)