Misplaced Pages

MailOnline: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:19, 20 January 2013 editPscorp19 (talk | contribs)101 edits Undid revision 534025449 by Collect (talk) it is not there, you are blind← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:40, 4 December 2024 edit undoHeadhitter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers98,903 editsm punctuationTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(378 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Website of the Daily Mail}}
{{distinguish|Email}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2023}}
{{Infobox website {{Infobox website
| name = MailOnline | name = MailOnline
| logo =
| favicon =
| url = {{URL|https://dailymail.co.uk}}
| logo = ]
| screenshot = | commercial = Yes
| type = {{hlist | ] | ] | ]}}
| caption =
| registration = Optional
| url =
| language = ]
| alexa = 122 ({{as of|2012|8|2|alt=August 2012}})<ref name="alexa">{{cite web|url= http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/dailymail.co.uk |title= Dailymail.co.uk Site Info | publisher= ] |accessdate= 2012-08-02 }}</ref><!--Updated monthly by OKBot.-->
| owner = ]
| commercial = Yes
| launch_date = 2003
| type = Portal
| current_status = Active
| registration =
| owner = ]
| author = Associated New Media
| launch date =
| current status = Active
| revenue =
}} }}
'''MailOnline''' (also known as '''''dailymail.co.uk''''') is the name of the website of the '']'', a newspaper in the ]. It contains almost all the stories from the ''Daily Mail'' and includes a large archive of main stories. The ''Daily Mail''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s sister paper, '']'', has its own website. '''MailOnline''' (also known as '''''dailymail.co.uk''''' and '''''dailymail.com''''' outside the UK) is the website of the '']'', a ] newspaper in the ], and of its sister paper '']''. MailOnline is a division of ], which is owned by ].

Launched in 2003 by the Associated Newspapers’ digital division led by ANM managing director Andy Hart,<ref>{{Cite news |title=Daily Mail finally embraces the internet |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/04/dailymail.digitalmedia |access-date=4 June 2022 |work=The Guardian |date=4 December 2003 |last1=Gibson |first1=Owen |archive-date=22 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220122220038/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/04/dailymail.digitalmedia |url-status=live }}</ref> MailOnline was made into a separately managed site in 2006 under the editorship of ] and general management of James Bromley.<ref>{{cite web |title=How 'Journalism Crack' Conquered the Internet |url=http://observer.com/2014/03/mailonline/ |website=The Observer |date=19 March 2014 |access-date=14 July 2015 |archive-date=22 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140322011731/http://observer.com/2014/03/mailonline/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/419-newspapers-merge-sales-teams-bromley-to-lead-mail-online/|title=DMGT, News Int Merge Sales Teams, Bromley To Lead Mail Online|last=Andrews|first=Robert|date=21 October 2008|website=gigaom.com|language=en-US|access-date=21 May 2018|archive-date=22 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180522112255/https://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/419-newspapers-merge-sales-teams-bromley-to-lead-mail-online/|url-status=live}}</ref> It is now the most visited English-language newspaper website in the world,<ref name=FT20140924>{{cite news | url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cf2e53d2-425e-11e4-a9f4-00144feabdc0.html | title=MailOnline and the next page for the 'sidebar of shame' | first=Henry | last=Mance | date=24 September 2014 | newspaper=Financial Times | access-date=25 December 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150418010133/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cf2e53d2-425e-11e4-a9f4-00144feabdc0.html | archive-date = 18 April 2015 | url-status = dead }}</ref> with over 11.34m visitors daily in August 2014.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1313132/newspaper-abcs-digital-figures-august-2014 | title=Newspaper ABCs: Digital figures for August 2014 | first=Joel | last=Fothergill | date=19 September 2014 | newspaper=Media Week | access-date=25 December 2014 | archive-date=26 March 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160326171818/http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1313132/newspaper-abcs-digital-figures-august-2014 | url-status=live }}</ref>{{needs update|date=July 2023}}

Previously, there was an attempt to call into question the integrity of the website's journalism after ]'s feature which is designed to fight what it describes as ]. ] warned users against trusting content at the site, asserting that "this website generally fails to maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability" and "has been forced to pay damages in numerous high-profile cases".<ref name="auto">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/jan/23/dont-trust-daily-mail-website-microsoft-browser-warns-users|title=Don't trust Daily Mail website, Microsoft browser warns users|first=Jim|last=Waterson|date=23 January 2019|work=The Guardian|access-date=23 January 2019|archive-date=23 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123113408/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/jan/23/dont-trust-daily-mail-website-microsoft-browser-warns-users|url-status=live}}</ref> This warning has since been removed, and NewsGuard stated that the website "generally maintains basic standards of accuracy and accountability", though it "still failed to gather and present information responsibly".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47088224|title=Mail Online web browser warning reversed|last=Fox|first=Chris|date=1 February 2019|publisher=BBC News|access-date=19 November 2019|archive-date=9 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191009002056/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47088224|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Reach== ==Reach==


The website has an international readership, featuring separate home pages for the UK, US, India and Australia.<ref>{{cite news|title=Mail Online to launch in Australia with Mi9|url=http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1222686/mail-online-launch-australia-mi9|access-date=31 January 2014|newspaper=MediaWeek|date=26 November 2013|archive-date=3 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140203041427/http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1222686/mail-online-launch-australia-mi9|url-status=live}}</ref> While the MailOnline maintains the politically ] editorial stance of the print edition, much of the content featured on the website is produced exclusively for the MailOnline and is not published in the ''Daily Mail''. It is known for its "] of shame",<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/mar/24/mail-online-sidebar-of-shame | title=The shocking thing about the Mail Online's sidebar of shame | first=Andrew | last=Brown | newspaper=The Guardian | date=24 March 2012 | access-date=12 December 2016 | archive-date=9 December 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161209165453/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/mar/24/mail-online-sidebar-of-shame | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=http://bjr.org.uk/data/2014/no3_kiss | title=A new medium seeks old skills | first=Jemima | last=Kiss | journal=British Journalism Review | volume=25 | number=3 | year=2014 | pages=33–38 | doi=10.1177/0956474814550597 | s2cid=147462904 | access-date=25 September 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150324155250/http://bjr.org.uk/data/2014/no3_kiss | archive-date=24 March 2015 | url-status=dead }}</ref> a box listing celebrity misdemeanours.<ref name=FT20140924 /> The '']'', alluding to a quote by ], has suggested that "] of MailOnline, you are tired of ]'s life – and most readers are not."<ref name=FT20140924/>
The website reached 78,994,874 ] in October 2011, up from 66 million in March 2011),<ref>{{cite news
|url= http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=47037&c=1
|title= ABC: Mail Online hits 66m monthly browsers|accessdate= 2011-05-18|date= 2011-04-28|work= PressGazette| location=London | first=Dominic | last=Ponsford}}</ref> according to the ], putting the site ahead of ] and all other similar sites.<ref>{{cite news
|url= http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48335|title= Mail Online hits new record with 79m unique browsers
|accessdate= 2011-12-07|date= 2011-11-24|work= PressGazette| location=London | first=Dominic | last=Ponsford}}</ref> That figure may also make it the UK's most popular news site, putting it ahead of the estimated 60 million unique browsers that ] receives (the BBC not being covered by the Audit Bureau of Circulations).<ref>{{cite news
|url= http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=47037&c=1
|title= Mail Online hits 56m web users and has only BBC to beat|accessdate= 2011-05-18|date= 2011-02-24|work= PressGazette| location=London | first=Dominic | last=Ponsford}}</ref>


The website reached 199.4 million ] in December 2014,<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150714005345/https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/abc-mail-online-on-verge-of-reaching-200-million-monthly-visitors-in-december/s2/a563873/ |date=14 July 2015 }} 22-January 2015</ref> up from 189.52 million in January 2014 and 128.59 million in May 2013,<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140204045343/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/mail-online-soars-biggest-ever-traffic-total-129m-unique-browsers-worldwide |date=4 February 2014 }} 20- June 2013</ref> according to the ].<ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1281725/newspaper-abcs-digital-statistics-january-2014|title= Newspaper ABCs: Digital statistics for January 2014|access-date= 24 February 2014|date= 20 February 2014|archive-date= 4 March 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140304043649/http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1281725/newspaper-abcs-digital-statistics-january-2014|url-status= live}}</ref>{{needs update|date=July 2023}}
Globally it is the most visited newspaper website, according to ], whose methodology gave the site 50.1 million unique visitors for October 2012, ahead of the previous leader, '']''' site, which received 48.7 million visitors in the same month.<ref>{{cite news
|url= http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/1066247/MailOnline-overtakes-Huffington-Post-become-worlds-no-2/
|title= MailOnline overtakes Huffington Post to become world's no 2 |accessdate= 2011-05-18|date= 2011-04-19|work= MediaWeek| location=London | first=Arif | last=Durrani}}</ref>


Globally, MailOnline is the most visited English-language newspaper website;<ref name=FT20140924/> ] gave the site 61.6 million unique desktop computer visitors for January 2014, ahead of '']''' website, which received 41.97 million visitors in the same month.<ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/1066247/MailOnline-overtakes-Huffington-Post-become-worlds-no-2/|title= MailOnline overtakes Huffington Post to become world's no 2|access-date= 18 May 2011|date= 19 April 2011|work= MediaWeek|location= London|first= Arif|last= Durrani|archive-date= 17 February 2022|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220217075512/https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/mailonline-overtakes-huffington-post-become-worlds-no-2/1066247?src_site=mediaweek|url-status= live}}</ref> According to ComScore, MailOnline recorded 100.5 million visitors across desktop computers, smartphones and tablets in that month.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140404053116/http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/3/comScore_Innovates_to_Deliver_Single_Metric_for_Global_Multi-Platform_Audiences? |date=4 April 2014 }} 31 March 2014</ref> In July 2014 it recorded 134 million users.<ref name="Royal Birth">{{cite web|title=Mail Online records 134m users in July|date=5 August 2013|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/aug/05/mail-online-royal-birth|publisher=Guardian Online|access-date=12 December 2016|archive-date=24 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160624074811/http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/aug/05/mail-online-royal-birth|url-status=live}}</ref>
According to ], in January 2011 MailOnline was the most popular online news site. MailOnline received 45.348 million unique visitors, with the ''New York Times'' second at 44.787 million.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092432/MailOnline-worlds-number-Daily-Mail-biggest-newspaper-website-45-348-million-unique-users.html |title=MailOnline is world's number one: Daily Mail has biggest newspaper website with 45.348 million unique users &#124; MailOnline |publisher=Dailymail.co.uk |date=2012-01-27 |accessdate=2012-03-29}}</ref>

Almost 70% of its traffic comes from outside the UK, mostly from the United States.<ref name=Guardian20140127>{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/27/mail-online-com-domain-name | title=Mail Online to switch to .com domain name | first=Mark | last=Sweney | newspaper=The Guardian | date=27 January 2014 | access-date=12 December 2016 | archive-date=19 November 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161119052429/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/27/mail-online-com-domain-name | url-status=live }}</ref> The ''Daily Mail'' print newspaper has no presence there, but has aggressively targeted the country with its online offering, branded as the "Daily Mail" rather than MailOnline.<ref name=FT20140924/> In January 2014 it paid over £1m to the '']'' for the domain name www.dailymail.com in order to increase its attractiveness to US advertisers.<ref name=Guardian20140127 />

In January 2014, it was ranked the eighth most-visited news website in Australia, up from tenth in December 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mumbrella.com.au/news-com-au-regains-top-spot-read-website-mail-online-now-eighth-position-206878|title=News.com.au regains top spot as most read website, Mail Online now in eighth position|work=mUmBRELLA|access-date=7 April 2014|archive-date=8 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140408211330/http://mumbrella.com.au/news-com-au-regains-top-spot-read-website-mail-online-now-eighth-position-206878|url-status=live}}</ref> Globally the site was forecast to reach £60m in advertising sales in the year to September 2014, up 49%.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8121578c-3e37-11e4-b7fc-00144feabdc0.html | title=DMGT suffers further software headaches | date=17 September 2014 | first=Henry | last=Mance | newspaper=Financial Times | access-date=25 September 2014 | archive-date=20 September 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140920010808/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8121578c-3e37-11e4-b7fc-00144feabdc0.html | url-status=live }}</ref>{{needs update|date=July 2023}}

£35m has been invested in creating the site.<ref name=FT20140924/> The site has introduced sponsored articles, with a guarantee of 450,000 page views at a cost of £65,000 per article.<ref name=FT20140924/>


==Content== ==Content==


MailOnline features a broad mixture of international news, and carries mainly UK-focused coverage of sport, personal finance, travel, celebrity news, science and lifestyle editorial. As of September 2014, it employs 615 people, including 406 editorial staff.<ref name=FT20140924/> These create over 750 articles per day.<ref name=FT20140924/>
MailOnline devotes much of its content to news and entertainment in the United States; this emphasis is in contrast to the print edition of the ''Daily Mail'', which has no presence there.{{fact|date=January 2013}}

A major component of the website is its entertainment news. It is estimated that 25% of the traffic received by the website is purely to access the entertainment and gossip stories.<ref name="Robinson20101115">{{cite news |first=James |last=Robinson |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/nov/15/mailonline-daily-mail-website |title=MailOnline: what is the secret of its success? |newspaper=The Guardian |date=15 November 2010 |access-date=23 August 2013 |archive-date=2 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002170810/http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/nov/15/mailonline-daily-mail-website |url-status=live }}</ref> The site publishes statistics about this activity.<ref>{{cite web|title=MailOnline - Stats Page|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/stats|access-date=17 November 2013|work=Daily Mail|archive-date=17 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131117041439/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/stats|url-status=live}}</ref> The house rules state that the monitors usually remove comments they do not agree with or inappropriate content in full,<ref>{{cite news|title=House rules|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/house_rules.html|publisher=MailOnline|access-date=23 February 2011|archive-date=19 January 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110119031329/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/house_rules.html|url-status=live}}</ref> although they do reserve the right to edit comments.<ref name="t&c">{{cite web|title=Terms and conditions of use|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-255767/Terms-conditions-use.html|website=Mail Online|date=7 June 2011|publisher=]|access-date=8 November 2015|quote=By submitting any material to Associated, you automatically grant Associated the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, edit, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such material (in whole or part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media, or technology now known or later developed for the full term of any rights that may exist in such content. You acknowledge that Associated is not obliged to publish any material submitted by you.|archive-date=5 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305052156/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-255767/Terms-conditions-use.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The site also does not allow comments on some articles for legal or editorial reasons.<ref>{{cite news|title=Reader Comments Security|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/readerCommentsSecurity.html|publisher=MailOnline|access-date=23 February 2011|archive-date=21 July 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080721052140/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/readerCommentsSecurity.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Sourcing==

In 2011, the first year of the Online Media awards, MailOnline won for "Best Brand Development."<ref> Press Gazette 24 June 2011 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121117120920/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/47357 |date=17 November 2012 }}</ref>

In March 2012, the ] published an article criticising the MailOnline for failing to give proper attribution to the sources of some article content, and often reprinting paragraphs without permission or attribution. The article said that when the MailOnline is called out for stealing content, it will sometime removes the text in question without acknowledging or apologising for the problem.<ref name="poynter"/>{{dead link|date=July 2023}}

], editor of MailOnline, said:{{when|date=July 2023}} "We will soon be introducing features that will allow us to link easily and prominently to other sites when further recognition of source material is needed."<ref name="poynter">{{cite web|title=Editor of Daily Mail's website defends attribution practices in face of growing criticism|url=http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/regret-the-error/167767/editor-of-daily-mails-website-defends-attribution-policy-in-face-of-growing-crticisim|work=poynter.org|access-date=6 January 2013|archive-date=31 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121231011947/http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/regret-the-error/167767/editor-of-daily-mails-website-defends-attribution-policy-in-face-of-growing-crticisim/|url-status=live}}</ref>

Daily Mail Australia has often been criticised by rival Australian news outlets, including ], ], ], ], '']'' and '']'',<ref name="mediawatch">{{cite web|url=https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/daily-mail/10465244|title=Fury at the Mail|work=Media Watch|publisher=ABC|date=5 November 2018|access-date=1 December 2018|archive-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108115210/https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/daily-mail/10465244|url-status=live}}</ref> for rewriting the work of their journalists despite employing 90 editorial staff as of November 2018.<ref name="guardAU">{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/nov/30/scott-morrison-misses-family-violence-event-for-a-sky-news-housewarming|title=Scott Morrison misses family violence event for a Sky News 'housewarming'|work=The Guardian Australia|first=Amanda|last=Meade|date=30 November 2018|access-date=1 December 2018|archive-date=30 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181130215120/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/nov/30/scott-morrison-misses-family-violence-event-for-a-sky-news-housewarming|url-status=live}}</ref> The ''Daily Mail'' has stated that other news outlets are threatened by their growing popularity and that they attribute their sources.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/09/news-corp-accuses-daily-mail-australia-of-plagiarism|title=News Corp accuses Daily Mail Australia of plagiarism|work=The Guardian Australia|first=Amanda|last=Meade|date=9 June 2014|access-date=1 December 2018|archive-date=1 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181201093114/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/09/news-corp-accuses-daily-mail-australia-of-plagiarism|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Controversies==
{{criticism section|section|date=July 2021}}
* September 2009: ] reported that a story posted in MailOnline about a solar panel made from human hair<ref>{{cite web|title=Is there something in the hair? The tale of a solar cell made with human hair|url=http://www.gizmag.com/human-hair-solar-cell/13080|date=15 October 2009|publisher=gizmag.com|access-date=17 January 2013|archive-date=3 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131103131019/http://www.gizmag.com/human-hair-solar-cell/13080/|url-status=live}}</ref> was a ].<ref>{{cite web|title=Nepal inventor creates a solar panel using human hair |url=http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/nepal-inventor-creates-a-solar-panel-using-human-hair-20090910|date=10 September 2009|publisher=geek.com|access-date=17 January 2013|archive-date=20 May 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120520062346/http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/nepal-inventor-creates-a-solar-panel-using-human-hair-20090910|url-status=dead}}</ref> Engineer Edward Craig Hyatt stated that it was not possible to use human hair in any configuration to generate electricity when exposed to light.<ref>{{cite web|title=Nepal Human Hair Solar Panel Hoax|url=https://sites.google.com/site/edwardcraighyatt/hairsolarpanelnepal|access-date=12 January 2013|archive-date=24 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130224044746/https://sites.google.com/site/edwardcraighyatt/hairsolarpanelnepal|url-status=live}}</ref>
*June 2010: '']'' reported that MailOnline had published an inaccurate story about an ] recall, based on a ] message from a parody account by a ] impersonator.<ref>{{cite news|author=Charles Arthur|title=Daily Mail fooled by fake Steve Jobs tweet on iPhone 4 recall|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/jun/27/daily-mail-twitter-jobs-iphone-mistake|date=28 June 2010|work=The Guardian|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=5 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105000702/http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/jun/27/daily-mail-twitter-jobs-iphone-mistake|url-status=live}}</ref> MailOnline realised its error and removed the article.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mail gets wrong number on iPhone 4 recall scoop|url=http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/13667/mail-gets-wrong-number-iphone-4-recall-scoop|date=28 June 2010|publisher=theweek.co.uk|access-date=18 January 2013|archive-date=3 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131103021305/http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/13667/mail-gets-wrong-number-iphone-4-recall-scoop|url-status=live}}</ref>
*<!-- Please comment on talk page before modifying this paragraph - this phrasing has been carefully negotiated. -->In October 2011, ''MailOnline'' and several other news sources published standby articles on ]'s trial prematurely. The articles reported an upholding of the guilty verdict before the judge had finished announcing the reversal of the guilty verdict.<ref>{{cite web|title=Daily Mail inquiry into 'Knox guilty' blunder|url=http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/47981|date=4 October 2011|publisher=PressGazette|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121220012008/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/47981|archive-date=20 December 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Joel Gunter|title=Daily Mail criticised over Amanda Knox guilty story|url=http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/daily-mail-criticised-over-amanda-knox-guilty-story-/s2/a546216|publisher=journalism.co.uk|date=4 October 2011|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=28 March 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130328182507/http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/daily-mail-criticised-over-amanda-knox-guilty-story-/s2/a546216/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Stuart Kemp|title=Amanda Knox Verdict: Daily Mail's Website Posts Wrong Decision|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amanda-knox-verdict-daily-mail-243191|work=The Hollywood Reporter|date=3 October 2011|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=10 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131210115802/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amanda-knox-verdict-daily-mail-243191|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Greenslade|first=Roy|title=The Guardian on the false Mail Online Amanda Knox verdict|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/oct/04/dailymail-amanda-knox|access-date=5 January 2013|newspaper=The Guardian|date=4 October 2011|archive-date=11 August 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130811193127/http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/oct/04/dailymail-amanda-knox|url-status=live}}</ref> MailOnline stated the article was removed within 90 seconds and apologized. The article became the subject of a ] complaint that noted the article's reporting of events and reactions that had not taken place and said that was "not acceptable" but commented positively on the handling of the error.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/48419 |title= Mail Online censured over 'Amanda Knox guilty' story |date= 9 December 2011 |work= Press Gazette|access-date= 14 January 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130329181520/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/48419 |archive-date= 29 March 2013 |url-status= dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/pcc-censures-mail-online-for-knox-verdict-report/s2/a547143/ |title= PCC censures Mail Online for Knox verdict report |author= Rachel McAthy |date= 12 December 2011 |publisher= journalism.co.uk |access-date= 14 January 2013 |archive-date= 3 November 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131103095431/http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/pcc-censures-mail-online-for-knox-verdict-report/s2/a547143/ |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/173551/daily-mail-spanked-for-fabricating-amanda-knox-story/ |title= Daily Mail spanked for fabricating Amanda Knox story |author= Andrew Beaujon |date= 10 May 2012 |publisher= Poynter |access-date= 14 January 2013 |archive-date= 31 December 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121231012750/http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/173551/daily-mail-spanked-for-fabricating-amanda-knox-story/ |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/dec/09/pcc-dailymail |title= Daily Mail censured for fictional story about Amanda Knox verdict |author= Roy Greenslade |date= 9 December 2011 |work= Greensdale Blog |access-date= 14 January 2013 |archive-date= 1 October 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131001084120/http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/dec/09/pcc-dailymail |url-status= live }}</ref>
*January 2012: ] reported the falsity of a story "repeated by numerous media outlets" concerning a supposed naming by'' ]'' of a campaign by singer ] for fashion house ] as the "sexiest ad of the year." The story, ''Ad Age'' said, "seemed to have originated with the British tabloid the ''Daily Mail.''<ref>{{cite web|title='Ad Age' Denies It Named Rihanna's Armani Ad 'Sexiest of the Year'|url=http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2012/1/4/ad-age-denies-it-named-rihannas-armani-ad-sexiest-of-the-yea.html|date=4 January 2012|work=Advertising Age|access-date=12 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131104042736/http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2012/1/4/ad-age-denies-it-named-rihannas-armani-ad-sexiest-of-the-yea.html|archive-date=4 November 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> ''Huffington Post'' removed the story and apologized.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sexiest Ads Of 2011 List Includes Rihanna, Miranda Kerr, Models In Skivvies (PHOTOS)|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/29/sexiest-ads-of-2011-rihanna_n_1174148.html|date=3 January 2012|work=Huffington Post|access-date=18 January 2013|first=Jessica|last=Misener|archive-date=21 June 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120621235638/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/29/sexiest-ads-of-2011-rihanna_n_1174148.html?|url-status=live}}</ref>
*January 2012: Robert Hart-Fletcher, of the charity Kids and Media, told ''BeefJack'', a gaming magazine, that quotes attributed to him were "completely fabricated" across a range of British media, most prominently the ''Daily Mail'' and the BBC.<ref>{{cite web|title=British news outlets 'fabricated' quotes to support anti-gaming story|url=http://beefjack.com/news/daily-mail-fabricates-quotes-to-spin-anti-gaming-story/|date=30 January 2012|work=BeefJack|access-date=12 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130413093011/http://beefjack.com/news/daily-mail-fabricates-quotes-to-spin-anti-gaming-story/|archive-date=13 April 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref>
*April 2012: MailOnline published an article about a dentist who extracted her ex-boyfriend's teeth; the piece was later exposed as a hoax by ]. The article appeared under the byline of reporter Simon Tomlinson, who said he did not know where the story came from.<ref>{{cite web|first=Eric|last=Tennant|title=Story of vengeful jilted dentist was too good to be true|url=http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/05/08/11601378-story-of-vengeful-jilted-dentist-was-too-good-to-be-true|publisher=MSNBC|date=8 May 2012|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=16 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132438/http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/05/08/11601378-story-of-vengeful-jilted-dentist-was-too-good-to-be-true?|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Jonathan Lemire|title=Sweet revenge: Dentist pulls ALL of ex-boyfriend's teeth out after getting dumped|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/sweet-revenge-dentist-pulls-ex-boyfriend-teeth-dumped-article-1.1069114|work=Daily News|location=New York|date=28 April 2012|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=3 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130603131144/http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/sweet-revenge-dentist-pulls-ex-boyfriend-teeth-dumped-article-1.1069114|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Vengeful Polish dentist story reported to be a hoax|url=https://www.foxnews.com/health/vengeful-polish-dentist-story-reported-to-be-a-hoax/|date=30 April 2012|work=Fox News Channel|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=10 September 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120910232354/http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/04/30/ultimate-revenge-recently-dumped-dentist-removes-all-her-exs-teeth/|url-status=live}}</ref>
*April 2012: '']'' reported that MailOnline had misused an ] published in Egypt's '']'' newspaper and translated into English by '']''. The original article claimed "Egypt's parliament was considering a piece of legislation sponsored by Islamists to allow men to have sex with their wives after their death." The ''Daily Mail'', according to ''Monitor'' staff writer Dan Murphy, "distorted the original claim from a proposal to a done deal: 'Egyptian husbands will soon be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives', the tabloid claimed, apparently having misunderstood the original ''Al Arabiya'' translation."<ref>{{cite web|title=Ahead of elections, Egypt's state propaganda machine rolls on|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0430/Ahead-of-elections-Egypt-s-state-propaganda-machine-rolls-on|date=30 April 2012|work=]|access-date=20 January 2013|archive-date=2 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130102202215/http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0430/Ahead-of-elections-Egypt-s-state-propaganda-machine-rolls-on|url-status=live}}</ref>
*October 2012: Actor ] received an apology and damages for a false story in MailOnline about allegations of tax evasion.<ref>{{cite news|title=Nicolas Cage receives damages and apology over online story|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-19803213|date=2 October 2012|work=BBC News|access-date=18 January 2013|archive-date=25 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130125092950/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-19803213|url-status=live}}</ref>
*July 2014: The MailOnline apologised after publishing an inaccurate story about the actor ] and the family of his fiancée. MailOnline said: "The story was not a fabrication but supplied in good faith by a reputable and trusted freelance journalist. However, we accept Mr Clooney's assurance that the story is inaccurate."<ref>{{cite news|title=George Clooney: A correction and an apology|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-2686658/George-Clooney-A-correction-apology.html|date=9 July 2014|work=Mail Online|access-date=9 July 2014|archive-date=10 July 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140710131213/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-2686658/George-Clooney-A-correction-apology.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Clooney described it as "the worst kind of tabloid. One that makes up its facts to the detriment of its readers."<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/11/george-clooney-rejects-daily-mail-apology | title=George Clooney rejects Daily Mail apology, calling it 'worst kind of tabloid' | first=Roy | last=Greenslade | newspaper=The Guardian | date=11 July 2014 | access-date=12 December 2016 | archive-date=11 March 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170311225708/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/11/george-clooney-rejects-daily-mail-apology | url-status=live }}</ref>
* April 2016: ] wrote in the '']'' about travelling to Iraq and writing a piece for '']'', then seeing his piece appear on ''MailOnline'' under someone else's ] "within five hours".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2016/04/what-it-s-fall-victim-mail-online-s-aggregation-machine |title=What it's like to fall victim to the ''Mail Online''{{'}}s aggregation machine |author=Martin Fletcher |author-link=Martin Fletcher |work=] |date=29 April 2016 |access-date=30 April 2016 |archive-date=7 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507070514/https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2016/04/what-it-s-fall-victim-mail-online-s-aggregation-machine |url-status=live }}</ref>
* November 2016: The headline "]" in an article about the actress ] is subsequently seen{{by whom|date=July 2021}} as part of racist treatment of Markle by some parts of the British media.<ref name=Ind21>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/meghan-markle-media-bullying-uk-press-b1811760.html|title=7 times Meghan Markle has been at odds with the UK media|author=Olivia Petter|date=8 March 2021|work=]|access-date=9 March 2021|archive-date=6 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210306183245/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/meghan-markle-media-bullying-uk-press-b1811760.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
* February 2017: Misplaced Pages bans ''MailOnline'' citations as unreliable content.<ref>{{cite news|last=Jackson|first=Jasper|title=''Misplaced Pages bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source''|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website|date=8 February 2017|work=]|access-date=17 January 2020|archive-date=8 February 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170208211856/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="independent.co.uk">{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/wikipedia-editors-ban-daily-mail-source-citation-unreliable-mail-online-a7570856.html|title=Misplaced Pages bans Daily Mail because it's an 'unreliable source'|date=9 February 2017|work=]|access-date=17 January 2020|archive-date=1 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200401221937/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/wikipedia-editors-ban-daily-mail-source-citation-unreliable-mail-online-a7570856.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
* April 2017: '']'' threatened MailOnline with legal action over copyright infringement regarding a ''Sun'' exclusive video. According to a ''Sun'' executive, MailOnline was seen as responsible for blatant "piracy".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/apr/25/the-sun-threatens-legal-action-against-mailonline-over-copyright-breach|title=The Sun threatens legal action over alleged MailOnline copyright breach|last=Martinson|first=Jane|work=The Guardian|date=25 April 2017|access-date=25 April 2017|archive-date=26 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426003226/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/apr/25/the-sun-threatens-legal-action-against-mailonline-over-copyright-breach|url-status=live}}</ref>
* July 2017: ''The Sun'' and the MailOnline drew criticism over the online posting of nude photos of Jodie Whittaker, the first women to play the character of ] in the British television show '']''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/2017/07/17/jodie-whittaker-doctor-who-the-sun/|title=Murdoch-owned paper publishes nude photos of new female Doctor Who|last=Bell|first=Gabriel|website=Salon|date=17 July 2017|access-date=18 July 2017|archive-date=17 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170717235157/http://www.salon.com/2017/07/17/jodie-whittaker-doctor-who-the-sun/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* November 2018: The ] television show '']'' dedicated an entire program to criticising the ''Daily Mail''.<ref name="mediawatch"/>
* January 2019: as part of its feature designed to fight ], ] began to warn users against trusting ''MailOnline'' content, asserting that "this website generally fails to maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability" and "has been forced to pay damages in numerous high-profile cases".<ref name="auto"/> This was overturned a week later.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/we-were-wrong-us-news-rating-tool-boosts-mail-online-trust-ranking-after-talks-with-unnamed-daily-mail-exec/|title='We were wrong': US news rating tool boosts Mail Online trust ranking after talks with unnamed Daily Mail exec|first=James|last=Walker|date=31 January 2019|website=Press Gazette|access-date=3 February 2019|archive-date=12 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190212062704/https://pressgazette.co.uk/we-were-wrong-us-news-rating-tool-boosts-mail-online-trust-ranking-after-talks-with-unnamed-daily-mail-exec/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* June 2019: MailOnline has been ] and remains inaccessible for not demonstrating "correct thought."{{cn|date=February 2023}}
* In August 2023 MailOnline suspended journalist ] as it investigated allegations of inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Waterson |first1=Jim |last2=editor |first2=Jim Waterson Media |title=MailOnline suspends Dan Wootton as allegations investigated |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/03/mailonline-suspends-dan-wootton-as-allegations-investigated |access-date=3 August 2023 |work=The Guardian |date=3 August 2023 |archive-date=3 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230803182225/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/03/mailonline-suspends-dan-wootton-as-allegations-investigated |url-status=live }}</ref>

==Awards==


In March 2014, MailOnline Sports was named Laureus Sports Website of the Year at the 2014 Sports Journalist Association awards.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140401083344/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2588402/MailOnline-named-Website-Year-Sports-Journalism-Awards-ceremony.html |date=1 April 2014 }} 24 March 2014</ref>
MailOnline allows users to comment on articles and moderates such comments. The house rules state that the monitors usually remove inappropriate content in full,<ref>{{cite web|title=House rules|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/house_rules.html|publisher=MailOnline|accessdate=23 February 2011}}</ref> though they do reserve the right to edit comments.<ref name="t&c">{{cite web|title=Terms and conditions of use|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/terms.html|publisher=MailOnline|accessdate=23 February 2011}}</ref> The site also does not allow comments on some articles for legal reasons.<ref>{{cite web|title=Reader Comments Security|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/readerCommentsSecurity.html|publisher=MailOnline|accessdate=23 February 2011}}</ref>


In December 2013, the MailOnline Android mobile app, Daily MailOnline, was named one of "The Best Apps of 2013" in the UK by the Google Play store.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140105090113/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2533745/MailOnline-named-one-10-best-Android-Apps-Britain-Google.html |date=5 January 2014 }} 4 January 2014</ref>
==Claimed inaccuracies==


In 2013, the MailOnline was singled out for a Design Effectiveness Award by the British Design Business Association. , the British agency that designed the MailOnline, received a Gold and the Grand Prix for the 2008 revamp<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.fastcodesign.com/1671875/4-lessons-from-the-web-s-most-ruthlessly-addictive-site|title=4 Lessons From The Web's Most Ruthlessly Addictive Site|date=18 February 2013|newspaper=Co.Design|access-date=14 February 2017|language=en-US|archive-date=15 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215024020/https://www.fastcodesign.com/1671875/4-lessons-from-the-web-s-most-ruthlessly-addictive-site|url-status=live}}</ref> at the annual 's Design Effectiveness Awards. The Grand Prix is the top prize at the awards ceremony and is given to the design project that delivers the greatest commercial benefit.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dezeen.com/2013/02/08/daily-mail-website-wins-design-award/|title=Daily Mail website wins design award|date=8 February 2013|website=Dezeen|access-date=14 February 2017|archive-date=15 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215031720/https://www.dezeen.com/2013/02/08/daily-mail-website-wins-design-award/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* September 2009: ] reported that story about solar panel made from human hair,<ref>{{cite web |title=Is there something in the hair? The tale of a solar cell made with human hair|url=http://www.gizmag.com/human-hair-solar-cell/13080|date= 15 October 2009| publisher=gizmag.com|accessdate=17 January 2013}}</ref> published in MailOnline, is a hoax.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nepal inventor creates a solar panel using human hair |url=http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/nepal-inventor-creates-a-solar-panel-using-human-hair-20090910|date= 10 September 2009| publisher=geek.com|accessdate=17 January 2013}}</ref> Experienced engineer Edward Craig Hyatt proved that it is not possible to use human hair in any configuration to generate electrical energy when exposed to light.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nepal Human Hair Solar Panel Hoax|url=https://sites.google.com/site/edwardcraighyatt/hairsolarpanelnepal|accessdate=12 January 2013}}</ref>
*June 2010: '']'' reported that MailOnline had published an inaccurate story about an ] recall, based on a ] message from a parody account by a ] impersonator.<ref>{{cite web |author= Charles Arthur |title=Daily Mail fooled by fake Steve Jobs tweet on iPhone 4 recall|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jun/27/daily-mail-twitter-jobs-iphone-mistake|date= 28 June 2010 | publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref> MailOnline realised its error and removed the article.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mail gets wrong number on iPhone 4 recall scoop|url=http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/13667/mail-gets-wrong-number-iphone-4-recall-scoop|date= 28 June 2010| publisher=theweek.co.uk|accessdate=18 January 2013}}</ref>
*<!-- Please comment on talk page before modifying this paragraph - this phrasing has been carefully negotiated (as of January 13, 2013). -->In October 2011, MailOnline and several other newspapers prematurely published standby articles on ]'s trial reporting an upholding of the guilty verdict before the judge finished announcing the reversal of the guilty verdict.<ref>{{cite web|title=Daily Mail inquiry into 'Knox guilty' blunder|url=http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/47981| date= 4 October 2011 | publisher=PressGazette|accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author = Joel Gunter |title=Daily Mail criticised over Amanda Knox guilty story|url=http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/daily-mail-criticised-over-amanda-knox-guilty-story-/s2/a546216|publisher=journalism.co.uk | date= 4 October 2011 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author= Stuart Kemp |title=Amanda Knox Verdict: Daily Mail’s Website Posts Wrong Decision|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amanda-knox-verdict-daily-mail-243191|publisher=Hollywood Reporter | date= 3 October 2011| |accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Greenslade|first=Roy|title=The Guardian on the false Mail Online Amanda Knox verdict|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/oct/04/dailymail-amanda-knox|accessdate=5 January 2013|newspaper=The Guardian|date=4 October 2011}}</ref> MailOnline removed the article within 90 seconds and apologized, and the error was the subject of a ] complaint that noted the article's reporting of reactions that had not taken place and said that was "not acceptable" but commented positively on the handling of the error.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/48419 |title= Mail Online censured over 'Amanda Knox guilty' story |author= |date= 9 December 2011 |work= |publisher= Press Gazette |accessdate=14 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/pcc-censures-mail-online-for-knox-verdict-report/s2/a547143/ |title= PCC censures Mail Online for Knox verdict report |author= Rachel McAthy |date= 12 December 2011 |work= |publisher= journalism.co.uk |accessdate=14 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/173551/daily-mail-spanked-for-fabricating-amanda-knox-story/ |title= Daily Mail spanked for fabricating Amanda Knox story |author= Andrew Beaujon |date= 10 May 2012 |work= |publisher= Poynter |accessdate=14 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/dec/09/pcc-dailymail |title= Daily Mail censured for fictional story about Amanda Knox verdict |author= Roy Greenslade |date= 9 December 2011 |work= Greensdale Blog |publisher= The Guardian |accessdate=14 January 2013}}</ref>
*January 2012: ] informed that ] found the fake story about ]'s campaign for Armani seemed to have originated with MailOnline. Other publications, including ], then published the same story.<ref>{{cite web |title="Ad Age" Denies It Named Rihanna's Armani Ad "Sexiest of the Year"|url=http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2012/1/4/ad-age-denies-it-named-rihannas-armani-ad-sexiest-of-the-yea.html|date= 4 January 2012 | publisher=Ad Age|accessdate=12 January 2013}}</ref> The ] has removed the story and apologized.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sexiest Ads Of 2011 List Includes Rihanna, Miranda Kerr, Models In Skivvies (PHOTOS)|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/29/sexiest-ads-of-2011-rihanna_n_1174148.html|date= 3 January 2012| publisher=The Huffington Post|accessdate=18 January 2013}}</ref>
*January 2012: Robert Hart-Fletcher, of the charity "Kids and Media", told ''BeefJack'', a gaming magazine, that quotes attributed to him were 'completely fabricated' across a range of British media, most prominently the Daily Mail and the BBC.<ref>{{cite web |title=British news outlets 'fabricated' quotes to support anti-gaming story|url=http://beefjack.com/news/daily-mail-fabricates-quotes-to-spin-anti-gaming-story/|date= 30 January 2012 | publisher=BeefJack|accessdate=12 January 2013}}</ref> In fact, he says, gaming can be an extremely beneficial activity for children to partake in.
*April 2012: MailOnline published an article about a dentist who extracted her ex-boyfriend's teeth; the piece was later exposed as a hoax by ]. The article appeared under the byline of reporter Simon Tomlinson, who said he does not know where the story came from.<ref>{{cite web |author= Eric Tennant |title=Story of vengeful jilted dentist was too good to be true|url=http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/05/08/11601378-story-of-vengeful-jilted-dentist-was-too-good-to-be-true|publisher=MSNBC.com | date = 8 May 2012 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Jonathan Lemire |title=Sweet revenge: Dentist pulls ALL of ex-boyfriend’s teeth out after getting dumped|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/sweet-revenge-dentist-pulls-ex-boyfriend-teeth-dumped-article-1.1069114|publisher= New York Daily News |date= 28 April 2012 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Vengeful Polish dentist story reported to be a hoax|url=http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/04/30/ultimate-revenge-recently-dumped-dentist-removes-all-her-exs-teeth/ |date= 30 April 2012 |publisher=Fox News|accessdate=5 January 2013}}</ref>
*April 2012: The ] reported that MailOnline used an opinion article published in the state-owned ] newspaper. A ] supporter wrote about a possible legalization of necrophilia, similar to that proposed by a Moroccan cleric several years ago. MailOnline picked the opinion and reported it as fact. According to Dan Murphy, "The chances of any such piece of legislation being considered by the Egyptian parliament for a vote is zero."<ref>{{cite web |title=Egypt 'necrophilia law'? Hooey, utter hooey|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0426/Egypt-necrophilia-law-Hooey-utter-hooey|date= 26 April 2012| publisher=The Christian Science Monitor|accessdate=18 January 2013}}</ref> The report of a proposed sex-after-death law have been debunked as false and "complete nonsense" by Egyptian parliamentary officials.<ref>{{cite web |title=Egypt may legalize dead-spouse sex, 14-year-old brides |url=http://now.msn.com/egypt-may-legalize-dead-spouse-sex-14-year-old-brides-correction|date= 26 April 2012| publisher=msn.com|accessdate=18 January 2013}}</ref>
*October 2012: ] has received an apology and damages for false story about his alleged tax troubles published in the Daily Mail's online edition.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nicolas Cage settles lawsuit with U.K. journalists|url=http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=763706|date= 2 October 2012| publisher=msn.com|accessdate=15 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Nicolas Cage receives damages and apology over online story|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-19803213|date= 2 October 2012| publisher=bbc.co.uk|accessdate=18 January 2013}}</ref>


In 2012, the MailOnline received the chairman's award for Online Media.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120915073816/http://www.thedrum.com/news/2012/06/22/hot-press-winners-shots-online-media-awards |date=15 September 2012 }} 22 June 2012</ref>
==Sources==


In 2012, the ''Daily Mail'' and MailOnline won "eight awards, including newspaper of the year, campaign of the year and hat-trick for ]".
In March 2012, the ] published an article saying that MailOnline did not always attribute its stories to the sources from which they were taken. Martin Clarke, editor of MailOnline, said, "We will soon be introducing features that will allow us to link easily and prominently to other sites when further recognition of source material is needed."<ref>{{cite web|title=Editor of Daily Mail’s website defends attribution practices in face of growing criticism|url=http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/regret-the-error/167767/editor-of-daily-mails-website-defends-attribution-policy-in-face-of-growing-crticisim|publisher=poynter.org|accessdate=6 January 2013}}</ref>
: "I'd like to pay the most enormous tribute to all of the journalists on the Daily Mail and MailOnline, our new very successful, equal partner," Dacre said after accepting the newspaper of the year award.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160916102219/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/mar/21/press-awards-winners |date=16 September 2016 }} ''The Guardian''; 21 March 2012</ref>


==References== ==References==
Line 59: Line 88:


==External links== ==External links==
* {{Official website|http://www.dailymail.co.uk}} * {{Official website|www.dailymail.co.uk}}
* *
*


{{Daily Mail and General Trust}} {{Daily Mail and General Trust}}


]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 22:40, 4 December 2024

Website of the Daily Mail Not to be confused with Email.

MailOnline
Type of site
Available inEnglish
OwnerDaily Mail and General Trust
URLdailymail.co.uk
CommercialYes
RegistrationOptional
Launched2003
Current statusActive

MailOnline (also known as dailymail.co.uk and dailymail.com outside the UK) is the website of the Daily Mail, a tabloid newspaper in the United Kingdom, and of its sister paper The Mail on Sunday. MailOnline is a division of dmg media, which is owned by Daily Mail and General Trust plc.

Launched in 2003 by the Associated Newspapers’ digital division led by ANM managing director Andy Hart, MailOnline was made into a separately managed site in 2006 under the editorship of Martin Clarke and general management of James Bromley. It is now the most visited English-language newspaper website in the world, with over 11.34m visitors daily in August 2014.

Previously, there was an attempt to call into question the integrity of the website's journalism after NewsGuard's feature which is designed to fight what it describes as fake news. Microsoft Edge warned users against trusting content at the site, asserting that "this website generally fails to maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability" and "has been forced to pay damages in numerous high-profile cases". This warning has since been removed, and NewsGuard stated that the website "generally maintains basic standards of accuracy and accountability", though it "still failed to gather and present information responsibly".

Reach

The website has an international readership, featuring separate home pages for the UK, US, India and Australia. While the MailOnline maintains the politically conservative editorial stance of the print edition, much of the content featured on the website is produced exclusively for the MailOnline and is not published in the Daily Mail. It is known for its "sidebar of shame", a box listing celebrity misdemeanours. The Financial Times, alluding to a quote by Samuel Johnson, has suggested that "If you are tired of MailOnline, you are tired of Kim Kardashian's life – and most readers are not."

The website reached 199.4 million unique monthly visitors in December 2014, up from 189.52 million in January 2014 and 128.59 million in May 2013, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

Globally, MailOnline is the most visited English-language newspaper website; ComScore gave the site 61.6 million unique desktop computer visitors for January 2014, ahead of The New York Times' website, which received 41.97 million visitors in the same month. According to ComScore, MailOnline recorded 100.5 million visitors across desktop computers, smartphones and tablets in that month. In July 2014 it recorded 134 million users.

Almost 70% of its traffic comes from outside the UK, mostly from the United States. The Daily Mail print newspaper has no presence there, but has aggressively targeted the country with its online offering, branded as the "Daily Mail" rather than MailOnline. In January 2014 it paid over £1m to the Charleston Daily Mail for the domain name www.dailymail.com in order to increase its attractiveness to US advertisers.

In January 2014, it was ranked the eighth most-visited news website in Australia, up from tenth in December 2013. Globally the site was forecast to reach £60m in advertising sales in the year to September 2014, up 49%.

£35m has been invested in creating the site. The site has introduced sponsored articles, with a guarantee of 450,000 page views at a cost of £65,000 per article.

Content

MailOnline features a broad mixture of international news, and carries mainly UK-focused coverage of sport, personal finance, travel, celebrity news, science and lifestyle editorial. As of September 2014, it employs 615 people, including 406 editorial staff. These create over 750 articles per day.

A major component of the website is its entertainment news. It is estimated that 25% of the traffic received by the website is purely to access the entertainment and gossip stories. The site publishes statistics about this activity. The house rules state that the monitors usually remove comments they do not agree with or inappropriate content in full, although they do reserve the right to edit comments. The site also does not allow comments on some articles for legal or editorial reasons.

Sourcing

In 2011, the first year of the Online Media awards, MailOnline won for "Best Brand Development."

In March 2012, the Poynter Institute published an article criticising the MailOnline for failing to give proper attribution to the sources of some article content, and often reprinting paragraphs without permission or attribution. The article said that when the MailOnline is called out for stealing content, it will sometime removes the text in question without acknowledging or apologising for the problem.

Martin Clarke, editor of MailOnline, said: "We will soon be introducing features that will allow us to link easily and prominently to other sites when further recognition of source material is needed."

Daily Mail Australia has often been criticised by rival Australian news outlets, including Fairfax Media, News Corp Australia, ABC News, Nine Network, The New Zealand Herald and The Guardian Australia, for rewriting the work of their journalists despite employing 90 editorial staff as of November 2018. The Daily Mail has stated that other news outlets are threatened by their growing popularity and that they attribute their sources.

Controversies

This article's "criticism" or "controversy" section may compromise the article's neutrality. Please help rewrite or integrate negative information to other sections through discussion on the talk page. (July 2021)
  • September 2009: Geek.com reported that a story posted in MailOnline about a solar panel made from human hair was a hoax. Engineer Edward Craig Hyatt stated that it was not possible to use human hair in any configuration to generate electricity when exposed to light.
  • June 2010: The Guardian reported that MailOnline had published an inaccurate story about an iPhone 4 recall, based on a Twitter message from a parody account by a Steve Jobs impersonator. MailOnline realised its error and removed the article.
  • In October 2011, MailOnline and several other news sources published standby articles on Amanda Knox's trial prematurely. The articles reported an upholding of the guilty verdict before the judge had finished announcing the reversal of the guilty verdict. MailOnline stated the article was removed within 90 seconds and apologized. The article became the subject of a Press Complaints Commission complaint that noted the article's reporting of events and reactions that had not taken place and said that was "not acceptable" but commented positively on the handling of the error.
  • January 2012: ABC News Radio reported the falsity of a story "repeated by numerous media outlets" concerning a supposed naming by Advertising Age of a campaign by singer Rihanna for fashion house Armani as the "sexiest ad of the year." The story, Ad Age said, "seemed to have originated with the British tabloid the Daily Mail. Huffington Post removed the story and apologized.
  • January 2012: Robert Hart-Fletcher, of the charity Kids and Media, told BeefJack, a gaming magazine, that quotes attributed to him were "completely fabricated" across a range of British media, most prominently the Daily Mail and the BBC.
  • April 2012: MailOnline published an article about a dentist who extracted her ex-boyfriend's teeth; the piece was later exposed as a hoax by MSNBC.com. The article appeared under the byline of reporter Simon Tomlinson, who said he did not know where the story came from.
  • April 2012: The Christian Science Monitor reported that MailOnline had misused an opinion piece published in Egypt's Al-Ahram newspaper and translated into English by Al Arabiya. The original article claimed "Egypt's parliament was considering a piece of legislation sponsored by Islamists to allow men to have sex with their wives after their death." The Daily Mail, according to Monitor staff writer Dan Murphy, "distorted the original claim from a proposal to a done deal: 'Egyptian husbands will soon be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives', the tabloid claimed, apparently having misunderstood the original Al Arabiya translation."
  • October 2012: Actor Nicolas Cage received an apology and damages for a false story in MailOnline about allegations of tax evasion.
  • July 2014: The MailOnline apologised after publishing an inaccurate story about the actor George Clooney and the family of his fiancée. MailOnline said: "The story was not a fabrication but supplied in good faith by a reputable and trusted freelance journalist. However, we accept Mr Clooney's assurance that the story is inaccurate." Clooney described it as "the worst kind of tabloid. One that makes up its facts to the detriment of its readers."
  • April 2016: Martin Fletcher wrote in the New Statesman about travelling to Iraq and writing a piece for The Times, then seeing his piece appear on MailOnline under someone else's byline "within five hours".
  • November 2016: The headline "(Almost) Straight Outta Compton" in an article about the actress Meghan Markle is subsequently seen as part of racist treatment of Markle by some parts of the British media.
  • February 2017: Misplaced Pages bans MailOnline citations as unreliable content.
  • April 2017: The Sun threatened MailOnline with legal action over copyright infringement regarding a Sun exclusive video. According to a Sun executive, MailOnline was seen as responsible for blatant "piracy".
  • July 2017: The Sun and the MailOnline drew criticism over the online posting of nude photos of Jodie Whittaker, the first women to play the character of The Doctor in the British television show Doctor Who.
  • November 2018: The media analysis television show Media Watch dedicated an entire program to criticising the Daily Mail.
  • January 2019: as part of its feature designed to fight fake news, Microsoft Edge began to warn users against trusting MailOnline content, asserting that "this website generally fails to maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability" and "has been forced to pay damages in numerous high-profile cases". This was overturned a week later.
  • June 2019: MailOnline has been blocked in China and remains inaccessible for not demonstrating "correct thought."
  • In August 2023 MailOnline suspended journalist Dan Wootton as it investigated allegations of inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.

Awards

In March 2014, MailOnline Sports was named Laureus Sports Website of the Year at the 2014 Sports Journalist Association awards.

In December 2013, the MailOnline Android mobile app, Daily MailOnline, was named one of "The Best Apps of 2013" in the UK by the Google Play store.

In 2013, the MailOnline was singled out for a Design Effectiveness Award by the British Design Business Association. Brand42, the British agency that designed the MailOnline, received a Gold and the Grand Prix for the 2008 revamp at the annual Design Business Association's Design Effectiveness Awards. The Grand Prix is the top prize at the awards ceremony and is given to the design project that delivers the greatest commercial benefit.

In 2012, the MailOnline received the chairman's award for Online Media.

In 2012, the Daily Mail and MailOnline won "eight awards, including newspaper of the year, campaign of the year and hat-trick for Craig Brown".

"I'd like to pay the most enormous tribute to all of the journalists on the Daily Mail and MailOnline, our new very successful, equal partner," Dacre said after accepting the newspaper of the year award.

References

  1. Gibson, Owen (4 December 2003). "Daily Mail finally embraces the internet". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 4 June 2022.
  2. "How 'Journalism Crack' Conquered the Internet". The Observer. 19 March 2014. Archived from the original on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  3. Andrews, Robert (21 October 2008). "DMGT, News Int Merge Sales Teams, Bromley To Lead Mail Online". gigaom.com. Archived from the original on 22 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
  4. ^ Mance, Henry (24 September 2014). "MailOnline and the next page for the 'sidebar of shame'". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 18 April 2015. Retrieved 25 December 2014.
  5. Fothergill, Joel (19 September 2014). "Newspaper ABCs: Digital figures for August 2014". Media Week. Archived from the original on 26 March 2016. Retrieved 25 December 2014.
  6. ^ Waterson, Jim (23 January 2019). "Don't trust Daily Mail website, Microsoft browser warns users". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 January 2019. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
  7. Fox, Chris (1 February 2019). "Mail Online web browser warning reversed". BBC News. Archived from the original on 9 October 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2019.
  8. "Mail Online to launch in Australia with Mi9". MediaWeek. 26 November 2013. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 31 January 2014.
  9. Brown, Andrew (24 March 2012). "The shocking thing about the Mail Online's sidebar of shame". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 December 2016. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
  10. Kiss, Jemima (2014). "A new medium seeks old skills". British Journalism Review. 25 (3): 33–38. doi:10.1177/0956474814550597. S2CID 147462904. Archived from the original on 24 March 2015. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
  11. Mail Online on verge of reaching 200 million monthly visitors in December Archived 14 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine 22-January 2015
  12. Mail Online soars to biggest ever traffic total with 129m unique browsers worldwide Archived 4 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine 20- June 2013
  13. "Newspaper ABCs: Digital statistics for January 2014". 20 February 2014. Archived from the original on 4 March 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  14. Durrani, Arif (19 April 2011). "MailOnline overtakes Huffington Post to become world's no 2". MediaWeek. London. Archived from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
  15. comScore Innovates to Deliver Single Metric for Global Multi-Platform Audiences Archived 4 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine 31 March 2014
  16. "Mail Online records 134m users in July". Guardian Online. 5 August 2013. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
  17. ^ Sweney, Mark (27 January 2014). "Mail Online to switch to .com domain name". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 November 2016. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
  18. "News.com.au regains top spot as most read website, Mail Online now in eighth position". mUmBRELLA. Archived from the original on 8 April 2014. Retrieved 7 April 2014.
  19. Mance, Henry (17 September 2014). "DMGT suffers further software headaches". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
  20. Robinson, James (15 November 2010). "MailOnline: what is the secret of its success?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 23 August 2013.
  21. "MailOnline - Stats Page". Daily Mail. Archived from the original on 17 November 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2013.
  22. "House rules". MailOnline. Archived from the original on 19 January 2011. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  23. "Terms and conditions of use". Mail Online. Associated Newspapers Limited. 7 June 2011. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2015. By submitting any material to Associated, you automatically grant Associated the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, edit, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such material (in whole or part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media, or technology now known or later developed for the full term of any rights that may exist in such content. You acknowledge that Associated is not obliged to publish any material submitted by you.
  24. "Reader Comments Security". MailOnline. Archived from the original on 21 July 2008. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  25. Online Media Awards 2011 Press Gazette 24 June 2011 Archived 17 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  26. ^ "Editor of Daily Mail's website defends attribution practices in face of growing criticism". poynter.org. Archived from the original on 31 December 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
  27. ^ "Fury at the Mail". Media Watch. ABC. 5 November 2018. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  28. Meade, Amanda (30 November 2018). "Scott Morrison misses family violence event for a Sky News 'housewarming'". The Guardian Australia. Archived from the original on 30 November 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  29. Meade, Amanda (9 June 2014). "News Corp accuses Daily Mail Australia of plagiarism". The Guardian Australia. Archived from the original on 1 December 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  30. "Is there something in the hair? The tale of a solar cell made with human hair". gizmag.com. 15 October 2009. Archived from the original on 3 November 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  31. "Nepal inventor creates a solar panel using human hair [Updated]". geek.com. 10 September 2009. Archived from the original on 20 May 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  32. "Nepal Human Hair Solar Panel Hoax". Archived from the original on 24 February 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
  33. Charles Arthur (28 June 2010). "Daily Mail fooled by fake Steve Jobs tweet on iPhone 4 recall". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  34. "Mail gets wrong number on iPhone 4 recall scoop". theweek.co.uk. 28 June 2010. Archived from the original on 3 November 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  35. "Daily Mail inquiry into 'Knox guilty' blunder". PressGazette. 4 October 2011. Archived from the original on 20 December 2012. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  36. Joel Gunter (4 October 2011). "Daily Mail criticised over Amanda Knox guilty story". journalism.co.uk. Archived from the original on 28 March 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  37. Stuart Kemp (3 October 2011). "Amanda Knox Verdict: Daily Mail's Website Posts Wrong Decision". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 10 December 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  38. Greenslade, Roy (4 October 2011). "The Guardian on the false Mail Online Amanda Knox verdict". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 August 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  39. "Mail Online censured over 'Amanda Knox guilty' story". Press Gazette. 9 December 2011. Archived from the original on 29 March 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  40. Rachel McAthy (12 December 2011). "PCC censures Mail Online for Knox verdict report". journalism.co.uk. Archived from the original on 3 November 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  41. Andrew Beaujon (10 May 2012). "Daily Mail spanked for fabricating Amanda Knox story". Poynter. Archived from the original on 31 December 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  42. Roy Greenslade (9 December 2011). "Daily Mail censured for fictional story about Amanda Knox verdict". Greensdale Blog. Archived from the original on 1 October 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  43. "'Ad Age' Denies It Named Rihanna's Armani Ad 'Sexiest of the Year'". Advertising Age. 4 January 2012. Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
  44. Misener, Jessica (3 January 2012). "Sexiest Ads Of 2011 List Includes Rihanna, Miranda Kerr, Models In Skivvies (PHOTOS)". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 21 June 2012. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  45. "British news outlets 'fabricated' quotes to support anti-gaming story". BeefJack. 30 January 2012. Archived from the original on 13 April 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
  46. Tennant, Eric (8 May 2012). "Story of vengeful jilted dentist was too good to be true". MSNBC. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  47. Jonathan Lemire (28 April 2012). "Sweet revenge: Dentist pulls ALL of ex-boyfriend's teeth out after getting dumped". Daily News. New York. Archived from the original on 3 June 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  48. "Vengeful Polish dentist story reported to be a hoax". Fox News Channel. 30 April 2012. Archived from the original on 10 September 2012. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  49. "Ahead of elections, Egypt's state propaganda machine rolls on". The Christian Science Monitor. 30 April 2012. Archived from the original on 2 January 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2013.
  50. "Nicolas Cage receives damages and apology over online story". BBC News. 2 October 2012. Archived from the original on 25 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  51. "George Clooney: A correction and an apology". Mail Online. 9 July 2014. Archived from the original on 10 July 2014. Retrieved 9 July 2014.
  52. Greenslade, Roy (11 July 2014). "George Clooney rejects Daily Mail apology, calling it 'worst kind of tabloid'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 March 2017. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
  53. Martin Fletcher (29 April 2016). "What it's like to fall victim to the Mail Online's aggregation machine". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 7 May 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  54. Olivia Petter (8 March 2021). "7 times Meghan Markle has been at odds with the UK media". The Independent. Archived from the original on 6 March 2021. Retrieved 9 March 2021.
  55. Jackson, Jasper (8 February 2017). "Misplaced Pages bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  56. "Misplaced Pages bans Daily Mail because it's an 'unreliable source'". The Independent. 9 February 2017. Archived from the original on 1 April 2020. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  57. Martinson, Jane (25 April 2017). "The Sun threatens legal action over alleged MailOnline copyright breach". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
  58. Bell, Gabriel (17 July 2017). "Murdoch-owned paper publishes nude photos of new female Doctor Who". Salon. Archived from the original on 17 July 2017. Retrieved 18 July 2017.
  59. Walker, James (31 January 2019). "'We were wrong': US news rating tool boosts Mail Online trust ranking after talks with unnamed Daily Mail exec". Press Gazette. Archived from the original on 12 February 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  60. Waterson, Jim; editor, Jim Waterson Media (3 August 2023). "MailOnline suspends Dan Wootton as allegations investigated". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 August 2023. Retrieved 3 August 2023. {{cite news}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  61. Daily Mail named Sports Website and Newspaper of the Year as Sportsmail picks up four gongs at SJA awards in London Archived 1 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine 24 March 2014
  62. MailOnline named one of the top 10 best Android Apps in Britain by Google Archived 5 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine 4 January 2014
  63. "4 Lessons From The Web's Most Ruthlessly Addictive Site". Co.Design. 18 February 2013. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
  64. "Daily Mail website wins design award". Dezeen. 8 February 2013. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
  65. Hot off the press: Winners shots from the Online Media Awards Archived 15 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine 22 June 2012
  66. Press Awards: Daily Mail leads winners Archived 16 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian; 21 March 2012

External links

Daily Mail and General Trust
DMG Media
DMG Broadcasting
DMG Events
Corporate directors
  • Lord Rothermere
  • Kevin Beatty
  • Paul Zwillenberg (CEO)
  • Tim Collier (CFO)
  • Tessa Keswick
Categories: