Misplaced Pages

Talk:Masturbation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:01, 22 January 2013 edit76.31.155.94 (talk) Pictures← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:13, 24 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Masturbation/Archive 13) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{talk header}} {{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 9
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Masturbation/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{tmbox
| type = content
| text = '''This is ] for general discussion of your personal experiences or stories about masturbation, nor is it for links to sites with masturbation material.''' Any such comments ] or ]. Please limit discussion to improvement of this {{pagetype}}. {{{2|}}} You may wish to ask factual questions about masturbation at the ], discuss relevant Misplaced Pages policy at the ], or ask for help at the ].}}
{{Censor}} {{Censor}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{controversial3}}
{{ArticleHistory {{ArticleHistory
| action1 = FAC | action1 = FAC
Line 21: Line 10:
| action1oldid = 82721254 | action1oldid = 82721254
| currentstatus = FFAC}} | currentstatus = FFAC}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WP Sexuality|importance=top|class=b}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality |importance=top }}
}}
{{press|date=August 17, 2009|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html|title=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008|org=]}} {{press|date=August 17, 2009|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html|title=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008|org=]}}
{{anchor|FAQ}}
{{tmbox
| type = content
| text = '''This is ] for general discussion of your personal experiences or stories about masturbation, nor is it for links to sites with masturbation material.''' Any such comments ] or ]. Please limit discussion to improvement of this {{pagetype}}. {{{2|}}} You may wish to ask factual questions about masturbation at the ], discuss relevant Misplaced Pages policy at the ], or ask for help at the ].}}
{{Controversial-issues}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 75K
|counter = 13
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Masturbation/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes
}}


{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=30}}
== Edit request on 2 November 2012 ==

{{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}}
<!-- Begin request -->
Add to Techniques:Male section:
Commonly, males may use a piece of clothing (especially a sock) <ref>http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/127?m=416967#416967</ref> to to aid in the practice of masturbation. This gives a unique pleasurable sensation when using the right kind of gentle fabric while providing the benefit of convenient cleanup.
<!-- End request -->
] (]) 03:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

:{{ESp|notdone}} http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/127?m=416967#416967 isn't a ]. ] (]) 20:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

== Age limit ==

is there an age limit for masterbation?? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Age?
Well I can only tell you about myself. When I was 5 years old, I went into hospital for a hernia operation and they stuck plasters over my penis, and I could not wank. I wanted to, but I could not. Then when I wanted to pee, I got the nurses to re-do the plastering for me. The nurses did not realize that males pee out of their penises. No... I could not believe it either and as I have said, I was only 5. Now I am well over 60 and still wanking. There you have it. ] (]) 18:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

:No, a medical leaflet for teenagers published by the ] says "an orgasm a day keeps the doctor away". By "orgasm" NHS means masturbation. A newspaper article about this leaflet is quoted in this Misplaced Pages article. ] (]) 07:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

== Pictures ==


== Images or videos ==
I entered this site to get to know about views on masturbation in history, and it felt weird to see enormous pictures of penises and clitorises. Maybe this article could be more on topic, and less about porno eyesore? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:::no sry ! some people are glad that their penises and pussys on wikipedia. They get horny and masturbate while thinking about how people read this article. And the people who prevent other users from removing the useless picture suffer from a mental illness. So really sry. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


This article should have videos, or photos, of a man and a woman masturbating, instead of drawings. Videos are better, but photos are better than drawings. ] (]) 15:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


:in turkish wikipedia thats also a problem. if we give information, then we should give information. ----] ] <sup>]</sup> 12:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm wondering if it is possible to create two pages for this article, a picture version and a picture-less version. I am not a prude, I like the text of this article and would like it to be freely read. Despite my lack of prudeness, I really can't get over how distracting the pictures are. I completely believe pictures are a necessary part of wikipedia, and even this article, but I would simply like to see a major editor give this some consideration. The picture version could even be the default, and a pictureless version offered at the beginning of the article. Or vice versa. Again, I am no prude and I do not find anything in this article disgusting, but I can't escape an extreme feeling of some form of voyeurism or something. Please, at least give this some thought. --] (]) 06:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
:I've moved some images to relevant sections and reduced their sizes per ] and ] as larger sizes do nothing to help readers understand the article better, and also serve as potential distractions for editors like you. Besides, the pussy shots and dick close-ups are probably better quality than most of the images hosted in WP; reduced size doesn't reduce viewing quality. You can use external tools/WP gadgets to disable images on all or certain urls/articles, but creating 2 versions would be content-forking. - ] (]) 10:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


== List of songs ==
Yeah I too think some of the pictures should be deleted, including the first one. Teenagers probably come to this article often, and exposing pornography to minors is illegal. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:59, 13 January 2013‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


The list of songs lacks sources and some of the songs listed seem dubious. ] (]) 21:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
:]. And you need to recall that this is a global encyclopaedia. Your concerns about illegality may apply in some parts of the world, but not in others. Then there is the question of whether a picture explaining something that's already described in text is, firstly, pornography, and secondly, any different in effect from that text. ] (]) 23:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


== Health masturbation? ==
::Still doesn't mean it's not illegal. Unless there is proof showing that the pictures there are of people over the age of 18, I will making a visit to my local law enforcement office and the local FBI building to inquire about an investigation that will get this site shut down in the US.


Masturbation is not health-beneficial; there is merely a correlation between more frequent ejaculation and a lower risk of prostate cancer, regardless of whether the ejaculation occurred sinfully or not. This correlation could theoretically also be caused directly by hormone levels without mediation through ejaculation.
== Caught ==


Otherwise, the risk of prostate cancer is negligible up to around the age of 50, and therefore, natural family planning through sexual abstinence does not significantly increase the risk of cancer. After around 50 years of age, women experience menopause, and the couple can engage in sexual intercourse at will. The situation is different for priests and monks, as they have completely devoted themselves to God, and any potential increased risk of prostate cancer is part of the sacrifice." ] (]) 23:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Should there be a sentence about people being caught masturbating? ] ] 00:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
:How is that even relevant aside from some personal fetish that some may have? It's trivia and you should know that. - ] (]) 08:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


:Cool, now where are the ]? <span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#00008B;background-color:transparent;;CSS">]]</span> 23:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
== Endorphins ==


::Science can make no ]s about how priests and monks should behave sexually. Many Eastern Orthodox priests are married, with children, and the same applies to many Protestant pastors. Also, many Eastern Orthodox monks have lovers or pay prostitutes.
I just an addition to the compulsive masturbation section that used to make a point that orgasm leads to "a drug like dependency" on endorphins, which under that heading implied that this was related to compulsive masturbation. This is so wrong, on so many levels. Sure, the cited article is about endorphins and includes that phrase, but the rest of the connections were entirely ]. --] (]) 23:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
::I agree that the correlation between masturbation and the chance of prostate cancer is murky.
:Well, are you an expert? I'm not, but I don't think you can doubt that orgasm and the release of chemicals in the brain has to do with compulsive masturbation and/or sex addiction. Regardless, the quality and type of refs on this subject are quite poor, and I don't think there are many reliable sources available besides specific medical studies on this, which are few and far between. Have you found anything? - ] (]) 09:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
::The correlation between having orgasms and cardiovascular health does not mean causation: both erections and cardiovascular health suffer from deposits of cholesterol.
::More generally: the claim that {{tqred|Masturbation is not health-beneficial}} is utterly rejected by mainstream medicine. There are enough mainstream ] ] in our article to that effect.
::The only proven ill health effect of masturbation is producing Peyronie disease in men who are foolish enough to try to bend their erect penis. ] (]) 00:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:13, 24 December 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Masturbation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Censorship warningMisplaced Pages is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.
? view · edit Frequently asked questions

The main points of this FAQ (Talk:Masturbation#FAQ) can be summarized as:

More detail is given on this point, below.

To view the response to a question, click the link to the right of the question.

Q1: Why don't you state masturbation addiction as fact? A1: Our policies on Misplaced Pages, in particular WP:WEIGHT and WP:FRINGE, require us to provide coverage to views based on their prominence within reliable sources, and we must reflect the opinion of the scientific community as accurately as possible. For example, if the APA will include masturbation addiction in the DSM, then Misplaced Pages will rubber-stamp its decision. Otherwise, Misplaced Pages isn't here to give a "fair and balanced" treatment to your pet ideas. In this respect, Misplaced Pages is merely a mirror which reflects medical orthodoxy. There is no official document from WHO, AMA, APA, Cochrane or APA which would imply that sex/porn/masturbation addiction would be a valid diagnosis. (CSBD isn't an addiction.) Further information: WP:MEDRS Q2: Why don't you state that porn use is paraphilia (pictophilia)? A2: The majority of US men use porn. What the majority does is axiomatically clinically normal in psychiatry. According to The Huffington Post, 70% of men and 30% of women watch porn. Quite probably, the majority of US population between ages 18 and 35 use porn at least once a week. DSM-5 code for pornography use? Not any. ICD-10 code for pornography use? Not any. ICD-11 code for pornography use? Not any. So, of course it isn't paraphilia. Even allowing that an excessive obsession with porn is paraphilia, normal (ordinary) porn use isn't. Past discussions References
  1. Stone, Lyman (26 June 2019). "Conservative Protestant Men Are Still Resisting Porn". Christianity Today. Carol Stream, Illinois. ISSN 0009-5753. Archived from the original on 27 June 2019. Retrieved 31 July 2021. By contrast, Protestant men today who attend church regularly are basically the only men in America still resisting the cultural norm of regularized pornography use.
  2. Brenner, Grant Hilary (19 February 2018). "When Is Porn Use a Problem?". Psychology Today. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
  3. Ritzenhoff, Karen A.; Hermes, Katherine A. (2009). Sex and Sexuality in a Feminist World. EBSCO ebook academic collection. Cambridge Scholars. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-4438-0426-4.
  4. Grubbs, Joshua B.; Perry, Samuel L.; Grant Weinandy, Jennifer T.; Kraus, Shane W. (19 July 2021). "Porndemic? A Longitudinal Study of Pornography Use Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Nationally Representative Sample of Americans". Archives of sexual behavior. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02077-7. ISSN 0004-0002. PMC 8288831. PMID 34282505. At baseline, 43.4% of participants reported not having viewed pornography in the past year and 38% of participants reported using pornography, on average, at least once per month (59% of men and 21% of women).
  5. Regnerus, Mark; Gordon, David; Price, Joseph (18 December 2015). "Documenting Pornography Use in America: A Comparative Analysis of Methodological Approaches". The Journal of Sex Research. 53 (7). Informa UK Limited: 873–881. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1096886. ISSN 0022-4499. If estimates generated from the RIA or NFSS are more valid, then pornography use is—or perhaps has become—a common and frequent experience among men, with just under half of all men using pornography in an average week. It is also not an uncommon or infrequent occurrence for women, with nearly one in five reporting pornography use in the past week.
  6. Kleinman, Alexis (4 May 2013). "Porn Sites Get More Visitors Than Netflix, Amazon And Twitter Combined". HuffPost. Retrieved 18 September 2021. Sources:
    1. Carroll, Jason S.; Padilla-Walker, Laura M.; Nelson, Larry J.; Olson, Chad D.; McNamara Barry, Carolyn; Madsen, Stephanie D. (2008). "Generation XXX". Journal of Adolescent Research. 23 (1). SAGE Publications: 6–30. doi:10.1177/0743558407306348. ISSN 0743-5584.Blue, Violet (24 July 2009). "Are more women OK with watching porn?". CNN.com. Retrieved 13 July 2022."One in three women watch porn - study - The Courier-Mail". news.com.au. 10 February 2010. Archived from the original on 14 February 2010. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
    2. Edelman, Benjamin (1 January 2009). "Markets: Red Light States: Who Buys Online Adult Entertainment?" (PDF). Journal of Economic Perspectives. 23 (1). American Economic Association: 209–220. doi:10.1257/jep.23.1.209. ISSN 0895-3309."Are the effects of pornography negligible? - UdeMNouvelles". nouvelles.umontreal.ca (in French). 1 December 2009. Archived from the original on 31 January 2013. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
    3. https://web.archive.org/web/20130116164054/https://www.google.com/adplanner/static/top1000/
    4. Hotsheet, Political (25 June 2010). "29% Accessed Porn on Work Computers Last Month - CBS News". Wayback Machine. Retrieved 13 July 2022.Leahy, Michael (2009). Porn @ Work: Exposing the Office's #1 Addiction. Moody Publishers. ISBN 978-1-57567-332-5.
    5. Anthony, Sebastian (4 April 2012). "Just how big are porn sites?". ExtremeTech. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  7. Buchholz, Katharina (2019-02-11). "Infographic: How Much of the Internet Consists of Porn?". Statista Infographics. Retrieved 2022-08-11.
Former featured article candidateMasturbation is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 21, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:

This is not a forum for general discussion of your personal experiences or stories about masturbation, nor is it for links to sites with masturbation material. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about masturbation at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Misplaced Pages policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.


Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13



This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Images or videos

This article should have videos, or photos, of a man and a woman masturbating, instead of drawings. Videos are better, but photos are better than drawings. AnnaFriendly2346 (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

in turkish wikipedia thats also a problem. if we give information, then we should give information. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ 12:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

List of songs

The list of songs lacks sources and some of the songs listed seem dubious. LordApofisu (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Health masturbation?

Masturbation is not health-beneficial; there is merely a correlation between more frequent ejaculation and a lower risk of prostate cancer, regardless of whether the ejaculation occurred sinfully or not. This correlation could theoretically also be caused directly by hormone levels without mediation through ejaculation.

Otherwise, the risk of prostate cancer is negligible up to around the age of 50, and therefore, natural family planning through sexual abstinence does not significantly increase the risk of cancer. After around 50 years of age, women experience menopause, and the couple can engage in sexual intercourse at will. The situation is different for priests and monks, as they have completely devoted themselves to God, and any potential increased risk of prostate cancer is part of the sacrifice." 89.190.52.148 (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Cool, now where are the sources? ZZ'S 23:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Science can make no positive statements about how priests and monks should behave sexually. Many Eastern Orthodox priests are married, with children, and the same applies to many Protestant pastors. Also, many Eastern Orthodox monks have lovers or pay prostitutes.
I agree that the correlation between masturbation and the chance of prostate cancer is murky.
The correlation between having orgasms and cardiovascular health does not mean causation: both erections and cardiovascular health suffer from deposits of cholesterol.
More generally: the claim that Masturbation is not health-beneficial is utterly rejected by mainstream medicine. There are enough mainstream WP:RS WP:CITED in our article to that effect.
The only proven ill health effect of masturbation is producing Peyronie disease in men who are foolish enough to try to bend their erect penis. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: