Revision as of 06:07, 27 January 2013 editDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,855 edits →RevDel request: Got it.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:38, 6 January 2025 edit undoDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,855 edits →Request for Guidance on Recreating the Draft:European Magnetism Association Page | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOINDEX__ | |||
] | |||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:<span style="font-family: 'palatino'; color: #2E5894"> Diannaa</span>}} | |||
<div style="background-color: #EEF9F5; border: 2px solid #2E5894; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); border-radius: 1em; padding: 1em 2em 0 2em;font-family: Arial, san-serif; text-align: justify;"> | |||
] | |||
{{CopyPatrol open reports}} | |||
<span style="border: 1px solid">]</span><span style="color:WhiteSmoke;"> · </span> | |||
{{clear}} | |||
{{/Talk page archive}} | |||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:{{teal|Diannaa}}}} | |||
== User undid all my contributions == | |||
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #b1c8ff; border: 1px solid #6587d1; vertical-align: top; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" | |||
| style="background-color: #ccddff; border-width: 1px 4px 4px 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: #6587d1; vertical-align: top; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" | | |||
<div style="font-family: Arial, san-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-align: justify;"> | |||
<small><span style="border: 1px solid"><span style="background-color:White; color:#003333">]</span></small><font color="WhiteSmoke"> · </font> | |||
] It is '''{{#time:g:i A|{{CURRENTHOUR}}:{{CURRENTMINUTE}} {{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{{1}}}|-7}} hours}}''' where this user lives in ]. | |||
The user ] keeps removing all my contributions and first I tried not to take it personally but now I'm feeling hounded. I added contributions to some articles, added the sources and he removed all of my edits simply because he didn't like the sourced link. He suggested IMSLP, which doesn't even have information about the text I added. Now it's a back and forth of him removing my entire contributions, regardless of what's inside. Right now he's removing the one I had added after you told me to review it, which I did. https://en.wikipedia.org/Psycho_(1960_film) | |||
{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="margin: 1em auto 2em; padding: 0.25em 0.5em; text-align: center; border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0.4em; font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Light'; {{round corners}}" | |||
He's moved onto every other revision I made and it's turning into an editing war. Please advise. ] (]) 14:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
|+ style="font-size: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.25em;" | Role models | |||
:It looks like all the additions use www.sheetmusicx.com as a citation. Do you have any assocuation with that website? --] (]) 15:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
::I don't, they're the only publisher releasing those works, that's why information about those pieces is so scarce. ] (]) 15:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
<!-- | style="border: 0;" | ] | |||
:::The website does not appear to be the official publisher for any of these scores. For sure they are not the official publishers for the Herrmann and Shostakovich works that ] added the link to. The company that they cite to also appears to be brand new. I haven't looked through all of its catalog, but a lot of its scores do not appear to even be available for sale until next year. None of these works are obscure. So it's odd that this editor chooses to cite a very obscure music publisher. | |||
| style="border: 0;" | ] --> | |||
:::Some of this user's edits are also perhaps unintentionally misleading. at '']'' suggested that the site they linked to was the first to publish the original score and parts. This would be incorrect, as previously existing sources in the article already confirm. —] (]) 16:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| style="border: 0;" | ] | |||
::::The "obscure" publisher has been in business for over a decade and is a respectable publisher | |||
| style="border: 0;" | ] | |||
::::https://daniels-orchestral.com/other-resources/publishers/s/ | |||
| style="border: 0;" | ] | |||
::::Their publishings go back to 2010 https://recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/Home/Search?q=STRAUSS&num=25&start=0&enviro=prod&DateBucket=2010-2019%7C2010&DataSource=Library | |||
| style="border: 0;" | ] | |||
The website registration shows 2010 in fact https://lookup.icann.org/en/lookup | |||
|- | |||
::::I don't know why you specifically have to be convinced of it in order for edits to stick, but I'm done even trying, just because you don't know something doesn't mean it's fake or dubious, it's people like you that make editing on Misplaced Pages so unpleasant. ] (]) 16:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::You need to discuss this somewhere else please. ] (]) 16:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::The ] continues harassing me and ], if I edit 4 articles he goes right there to undo what I edit, regardless of the content, you just have to see his ] where he goes around reverting whatever I touch. Now he is trying to ], when I'm clearly not one. At this point I'd like to know if there's a way to stop him from interacting with my edits, or some temporary block on him? He's making editing on Misplaced Pages very unfriendly and acts like he owns it ]. I cited proper sources in my edits, I don't know why he's been targeting me but it's exhausting. ] (]) 09:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::::::This is already being discussed at ] and ]. Sorry but I don't have time to get involved. It's an edit war orver the reliability of a particular website, and I don't have time to get into that.--] (]) 13:37, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Backendgaming sockpuppets == | |||
<!-- ! scope="col" | St. Paul's Church, Banff <br />As seen from Earl's | |||
! scope="col" | Send me no flowers --> | |||
! scope="col" | <small>Non-attachment</small> | |||
! scope="col" | Logic | |||
! scope="col" | Courage | |||
! scope="col" | Class | |||
Hi Diannaa, I am asking for your opinion on this subject because you were an admin that dealt with the ] against ]. Since the last recorded incidents from 2018, I noticed there were further potential sockpuppet accounts made since then, including the following: | |||
|} | |||
*] | |||
{{Sidebar with collapsible lists | |||
*] | |||
| title = Talk page archive | |||
*] | |||
| image = ] | |||
*] | |||
| caption = The ] ''Repulse'' (1820) | |||
*] | |||
| class = plainlist | |||
*] | |||
| navbar = none | |||
All of which display a notable overlap in edit style and choice of topic with ]. Although some have not been used recently, and the others have been recently blocked for personal attacks against other editors, my question is whether you think it is worth doing a checkuser on these accounts as sockpuppets of ]? If identified as socks, it would help in watching over articles that tends to be targeted, help identify further socks as ] remains actively editing, and may help to undo a lot the disruptive edits already made. Any thoughts on this are appreciated. Thanks. ] (]) 10:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| style = width: auto; font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Light'; | |||
| list1title = 2009–2010 | |||
| list1 = | |||
* ] Nov 2009–June 2010 | |||
* ] July 2010–October 2010 | |||
* ] October 2010–Nov 2010 | |||
* ] November 2010 | |||
* ] December 2010 | |||
| list2title = 2011 | |||
| list2 = | |||
* ] January 2011–Feb 2011 | |||
* ] Feb 2011–March 2011 | |||
* ] March 2011–April 2011 | |||
* ] April 2011–May 2011 | |||
* ] May 2011–June 2011 | |||
* ] June 2011–July 2011 | |||
* ] July 2011–August 2011 | |||
* ] August 2011–Oct 2011 | |||
* ] October 2011–Dec 2011 | |||
| list3title = 2012 | |||
| list3 = | |||
* ] Jan 2012–Feb 2012 | |||
* ] Feb 2012–March 2012 | |||
* ] April 2012 | |||
* ] May 2012–June 2012 | |||
* ] June 2012–July 2012 | |||
* ] July 2012 | |||
* ] August 2012–September 2012 | |||
* ] September 2012–October 2012 | |||
* ] November 2012 | |||
* ] December 2012 | |||
| list4title = 2013 | |||
| list4 = | |||
* ] January 2013 | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
:Sorry, I don't know mich about this topic. Please go to ] to file your report. Thanks, ] (]) 11:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ''The Bugle'': Issue LXXXII, January 2013 == | |||
== Wikizilla; copyright or not? == | |||
{| style="width: 100%;" | |||
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
{| | |||
| ] | |||
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
* Project news: '']'' | |||
* Articles: '']'' | |||
* Book reviews: '']'' | |||
* Op-ed: '']'' | |||
</div> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
|} | |||
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> | |||
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0445 --> | |||
Hi Diannaa! Happy almost new year :) I see that you removed and revdeleted content at ] from Wikizilla stating that it wasn't compatible and then later on at ] declined the G12 and attributed it. Do you think it's ultimately compatible? I see that it's been removed and revdelled at ] additionally, and I just reverted a removal at ] myself, so it seems like we're all off-base and I thought I'd get another opinion. ] (]) 04:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ''The Signpost'': 21 January 2013 == | |||
:Hi Sennecaster, that's a good question. Their copyright page is hard to find, so I bookmarked it. . ] (]) 09:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-01-21}} | |||
</div><!--Volume 9, Issue 04--> | |||
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
* ''']''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (]) 22:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0446 --> | |||
== Request for Assistance == | |||
== 2012 Delhi Gang Rape case protection expired == | |||
You are an administrator that I respect, @]. If possible, I would value your contribution to the ]. It would mean a lot to have your third-party, experienced perspective. ] (]) 19:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
The protection at ] has expired. Do you mind looking into it, and reapplying the correct protection levels? | |||
] (]) 22:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: I have now had time to check this over and it looks like most of the IP edits and edits from unconfirmed users are okay. There was one really bad unsourced edit but it was from before the pending changes protection wore off and was removed by an established editor. There's information starting to come in about the legal aspects of the case now, so I think leaving it unprotected would be the way to go right now. If you disagree, please post a request at ] and another admin will have a look. -- ] (]) 04:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Interactive Artificial inteligence == | |||
== Good Evening Diannaa == | |||
Greeting | |||
I am here in regards to a note that I received from you regarding ]. I'd like to explain the circumstances and hear what you have to suggest. I have already sort of discussed the issue with my copyright guru/adversary ] ]. Sort of, mostly it is about another picture from the carpcchives, but this one is mentioned by me. . It goes like this. I am my family's archivist and this picture is from there, the Caldwell Kvaran Archives, sometimes known as the carpchives. This is a picture from there. However to determine who the photographer is would be impossible. Erik Eslander (dead about 30 years) took a bunch of pictures like this. The ] sent around photographers every now and again who might have taken it. Wonder what their copyright policies are? They have not answered my emails, so, who knows? Could have been someone else with a camera, there that day. Anyway, I am in posession of the prints and figure to be as much the copyright holder as anyone, now. This picture is from the mid 1950s, taken in Ceylon, which might matter or might not. So . .... what do I do now? Einar aka ] (]) 03:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
i am a university student and was tasked with creating a wikipedia page creating a new page in wiki pedia in the path of expanding information. | |||
:Well I see that you have discovered the picture that Ron Jones and I were discussing, my mother's picture of Matt Gordon, ]. He had a crush on her in high school and sent her the picture. You might want to read Ron's analysis of the picture, unless you consider him to be soft on the subject. ] (]) 03:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
i choosed "interactive artificial intelligence" as my topic and used the article "Interactive AI With Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Next Generation Networking" written by Ruichen Zhang , Hongyang Du , Yinqiu Liu , Dusit Niyato , Jiawen Kang , Sumei Sun , Xuemin Shen , and H. Vincent Poor as a source but i was striked as advertisement ban the second time i tried to publish the article i got permanently ban. | |||
:: Hi Carptrash! Sorry to have to tag your pics. What you need to do is have a look at the ], which gives all the information on when stuff becomes public domain. You do not own the copyright to a photo simply because you have a copy of it in your possession; in all cases, the photographer is the copyrightholder, unless he has signed away his copyright to an employer or has released the material under license. So if you have in your possession a photograph like ] where the identity of the photographer is unknown, and their date of death is unknown, and as far as we know the image has never been published before, the copyright does not expire until 120 years after creation of the image. For an anonymous picture taken in Sri Lanka in 1950, the copyright expires in 2070. For the Matt Gordon picture, the copyright expires in 2063. If you know the identity of the photographer and their date of death, the copyright expires 70 years after their date of death. There's a different set of rules for photos that have previously been published (in a book, magazine, online, or as a postcard, for example) and those that have not. It's up to the uploader to prove previous publication. There's special rules for ], ], ], and ]. That's just the tip of the iceberg. I know that I know lots but I also know that there's lots that I don't know! I feel like -- ] (]) 03:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
i want to ask for an reconsideration for uploading my article as i did not aim for any advertising and only stated IAI advancements againts traditional tools. | |||
:::Published on line? If I publish them on line that I can use them? And please do not quote Donald Rumsfeld. I have worked hard forgetting him, don't need him back in my vibration. Thanks for your input, it is probably time I took a wikibreak. ] (]) 04:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
thank you for reading. ] (]) 23:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Photograph of Nissanka Wijeyeratne with Raja (elephant) == | |||
* | |||
Photograph of my father Nissanka Wijeyeratne & J.R Jayawardene with Raja (elephant) photograph is solely owned by me | |||
:Sorry, I can't find your deleted article, and you don't have any deleted contributions under the username ]. Please tell me which account you were using when you created the article. Were you actually banned or blocked? What was the exact title of your article? or was it in a sandbox, or a draft? ] (]) 01:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
::I think they mean ]. ] (]) 06:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, that's it. The draft was deleted twice, because it was copied from , which is not compatibly licensed. That's a violation of our copyright policy. Then there's ], which is another copy, but in Persian. @], please don't add copyright material to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 12:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::OP blocked as a block-evading sockpuppet of blocked spammer/copyvio'er, {{np|Iliya IZ}}. --] (]) 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks Yamla, case closed, at least for now. ] (]) 12:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Request for Guidance on Recreating the ] Page == | |||
Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne | |||
Hello Diannaa, | |||
] (]) 04:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
I am not the original creator of the deleted page, but I am part of the team and we are working on reworking the Draft:European Magnetism Association page, which was previously deleted due to copyright concerns. | |||
: Please look at the ], which gives all the information on when photographs becomes public domain. You do not own the copyright to a photo simply because you have a copy of it in your possession; in all cases, the photographer is the copyright holder, unless he has signed away his copyright to an employer or has released the material under license. A photograph where the identity of the photographer is unknown, and their date of death is unknown, and as far as we know the image has never been published before, the copyright does not expire until 120 years after creation of the image. Please stop uploading these images. Thank you. -- ] (]) 05:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
We are currently preparing a new draft with fully original content and I would like to ensure that it aligns with Misplaced Pages's guidelines. Could you kindly advise me on how best to proceed? | |||
Thank you for your time and assistance. | |||
Kind regards, | |||
Evgenia ] (]) 15:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:I see that you've already created a new draft, and have copied a bunch of stuff from the association's website. That's not okay. Please see your talk page for what to do next.] (]) 20:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Hi == | |||
== Photograph of Nissanka Wijeyeratne with Raja (elephant) == | |||
Hello Diannaa: I'm Jean Mercier. I need your help. Some people accuse me of being a puppet of someone else who has my name. These people have weak evidence against me while I have already proven that I am not that guy. To make matters worse, they blocked me. Please help me. ] (]) 18:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Photographer is my brother Neranjan Wijeyeratne | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne | |||
] (]) 05:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 05:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Bob Hope's leading ladies== | |||
Diannaa, I think it weakens the point about the astonishing array of leading ladies sashaying through Hope's movie career (many people today think of Hope as mainly a television performer but his best work, as he always pointed out himself, was in his movies) but I see where you're coming from regarding the guidelines you cited, which I never bother to glance at myself except under duress. In any case, hope you're having a great morning and thanks for the vigilant input, Diannaa. I'm always receptive to an alternate take on something. ] (]) 05:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Good morning EnjoyForward. I did not agree with everything this particular reviewer said and did, but in this particular instance I think she was right. The article was too list-y. And the truth be known, these actresses were pretty famous back in the day, but they're not so well known any more. Even Adolf Hitler needs to be identified in a photograph, see {{diff|Adolf Hitler|534274741|534054442|Diff of Adolf Hitler}} -- ] (]) 15:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Photograph of Nissanka Wijeyeratne with Raja (elephant) == | |||
I am waiting to get your advice to upload the above photograph. The photographer had given the ownership to me. | |||
Waiting to hear from you please | |||
Warm regards, | |||
Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne | |||
] (]) 06:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Photograph of Nissanka Wijeyeratne with Raja (elephant) == | |||
* Reminder | |||
I am waiting to get your advice to upload the above photograph. The photographer had given the ownership to me. | |||
Waiting to hear from you please | |||
Warm regards, | |||
Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne | |||
] (]) 13:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Hello Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne. What you need to do is get the copyright holder of the photograph to send an email to the OTRS team using the instructions at ]. They will place an OTRS ticket on the file showing that the copyright holder has given permission to display the file here. Regards, -- ] (]) 15:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Sorry to be so long in replying; I live in Canada and had to go to bed. -- ] (]) 15:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Thank you == | |||
I would greatly appropriate it. Thank you very much. | |||
With warm regards, | |||
Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne | |||
] (]) 04:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Images Marked == | |||
Re the images you marked - ] and ] | |||
I have re-uploaded these and other images to my WikiCommons accnt - ] - and have requested appropriate consent emails pertaining to each image be sent directly to permissions-en@wikipedia.org | |||
The 2 files you marked which I uploaded to Misplaced Pages can be deleted. Misplaced Pages seemed to want them uploaded to Wikicommons in anycase! Which I have now done, and will relink the images to the main articles once approval is granted (I assume automated but will check periodically!). | |||
I also note that some logos I uploaded to Misplaced Pages, namely FaceAdrenalin-Logo, Olav Zipser's First School of Modern SkyFlying Logo, and | |||
Olav Zipser Official FreeFly Astronaut Project Space Patch, have been marked as needing to be smaller and for some other stuff. I have also uploaded these and others to WikiCommons ] as well as requested appropriate consent emails be sent direct to permissions-en@wikipedia.org for all of these. | |||
Perhaps you can check some of my latest image uploads to Wikicommons and give it all an overview and let me know if there is anything I need to give any more attention to at this time. I am hoping to have this image uploading and referencing thing waxed and YES I have read hundreds and thousands of words from the various articles in an attempt to understand everything! | |||
Thanks in advance for the assistance and guidance ] (]) 19:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Hi Quadtripplea. If there's an email on the way, you need to add the {{tp|OTRS pending}} template to the files. That way, no one will delete/nominate for deletion the files for a while, and it makes it easier for the OTRS team to match up images with emails. I have done that for the two files on the Commons that you mention above.<p>I was looking over your other uploads to the Commons, and there's some problems. First, I'd like to say that only files to which you personally own the copyright should be uploaded to the Commons, plus those images with OTRS permssion tickets in place, and those with OTRS pending. Corporate logos should ''not'' be on the Commons unless they have an OTRS ticket attached. Non-free logos need to be uploaded here to en.wiki and marked for ]. Several of these logos are already here and are marked for fair use, and thus should not be on the Commons. These I will nominate for deletion from the Commons: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
:There's several non-free logos that you uploaded that are present on the Commons that should not be there; they should be here on en.wiki and marked for fair use. These I will nominate for deletion on the Commons, but will make a local copy for fair use: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
:There's also several photographs on the Commons with inadequate evidence of permission of the original photographer. These I will mark for deletion, and you will have a week to contact the copyright holders to get emails sent to get the required OTRS tickets in place: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
:Sorry that this stuff is all so fiendishly difficult and complicated. Simple summary: If you did not personally take the photo, please arrange for an email from the copyright holder to be sent to the OTRS team. Files of this type can be uploaded to the Commons; please mark them with an {{tp|OTRS pending}} template. Corporate logos should be uploaded here, and marked for fair use. An example where this has been properly done is ]. This logo is too large to meet our ], so I have marked it for size reduction as well. -- ] (]) 20:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:::I just spent 15 hours in front of a computer with multiple browsers open reading everything I could and trying to do everything right. I requested the emails for consent be sent direct, which I spent hours deciphering, these are also probably wrong and will have wasted my time and the owners of the logos and images time, which will all have to be repeated... I am very unclear even having read your message several times - these here those there, those too large, those not these, those if that with them and this over there but not if... now these ones over there are marked for deletion, and those over here should be up there. So whatever! Im over images. The ones that are there can just fall away. Over it for now. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::::Im confused. Cant you fix things up? Im also not clear on what I should and shouldnt bother working on with what you are deleting anyway ] (]) 20:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::: I am indeed fixing everything up that is in my power to fix. I have just spent the last hour and a half on it. All the logos are now here on en.wiki, except for the one for the Ranch Resort, which has already got an OTRS permission ticket in place. Don't worry about the size reductions; we have people who specialise in that. What you need to do, if you have not already done so, is to contact the copyright holders of the photographs and get emails sent giving permission to display the images here. For each image that has an email on the way, add an {{tp|OTRS pending}} template. That will keep the files from being deleted for quite some time as they will be in the OTRS queue. And if they are deleted and an email is received at a later date, they can be undeleted. -- ] (]) 20:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Decorah Eagles images == | |||
Hi, thank you for alerting me about my screen-shots, but I don't see what is needed from me. After reading the link you suggested, it seems I've done all that is needed by providing the URL to Ustream, from which the screen-shots came. Please leave me simple instructions so I can help further. . Much appreciated, '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 01:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Hi Petrarchan47. I'm just not seeing anywhere on that webpage where the material is released under license or is in the public domain and is thus available to display here. Am I missing something? -- ] (]) 01:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I'm probably the one missing something. I've never uploaded images before these, they are screen-shots that I took from my own computer while watching the eagles on their Usteam channel. Does that make me the owner, and what do I need to do to make these images available to display? '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 01:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::In other words, to my knowledge I own these images. If that is the case, what exactly do I need to do to make these free for anyone to use? The tag says that I had chosen to copyright these images. I did not mean to do that. Thanks for your patience. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 01:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: I have been digging around and it looks like their site policy says that the copyright would have to be specifically released by the stream originator. I don't know how to find the specific stream from which you captured the images. Looking at some of the other streams, I am unable to figure out how to determine if the material is copyright or if it has been released under license. is a link to their site-wide copyright policy. -- ] (]) 01:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks. is the Ustream channel in question. I could get approval from Raptor Resource Project, if that's what is needed. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 03:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::: That would be best, as there does not seem to be a release or license on that page (other than the routine copyright notice). What you need to do is to ask them to send an email directly to the OTRS team telling them that it is okay to display images from the feed on this website. There's instructions at ]. Once you know their email is on the way, please add an {{tp|OTRS pending}} template to each image for which they've given approval. Make sure you include all the images that you uploaded from the feed, not just the four that I tagged for deletion. Once the email is on the way to the OTRS team, please let me know, and I will remove the deletion nomination templates. So sorry for the extra work, but Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. Thanks -- ] (]) 03:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::No problem, thanks for making it so clear. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 03:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::Does relieve me of the need for an email? '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 03:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::From what I understand, RRProject has given free license to use of their Ustreams if their website is linked as the source. So I've changed the source from UStream to RRP on all applicable images. Please let me know if I've more to do. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 05:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::: This is exactly what we were looking for, but you will still have to get an email, as the "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" license is not compatible with the files being hosted here, as it only allows for non-commercial use. That means an email giving permission will still be required. Sorry for the extra trouble. -- ] (]) 15:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Why would we need anything other than non-commercial use, Misplaced Pages isn't selling anything? So sorry to trouble you with these questions... '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 01:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::: Don't worry, it's a perfectly reasonable question. It's because there's a Misplaced Pages policy that the content, excluding that which is specifically labelled as "non-free" or "fair use", has to be freely copyable by anyone for any purpose. Therefore the copyright holder has to release the material to us under a compatible license. The "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" license is not a compatible license, because it prohibits commercial use. ] gives information on this point. -- ] (]) 01:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Just delete them. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 01:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::: Why not try to get the OTRS ticket? You coud send them an email and ask. :/ -- ] (]) 01:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::The photos really do make the article, since the subject is visual, but I don't have the time to figure out OTRS. It might seem simple to you, but seriously that is one complicated instruction page. Are there any volunteers who know how this process works who try to help save images? '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 01:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{outdent}} Simple instructions: | |||
* Contact the copyrightholder by email and tell them you wish to display the images on Misplaced Pages. Give them the urls for what you've got uploaded. | |||
* Ask them if it's okay to display the images, and if so, suggest that they release the material under a or other similar license. | |||
* If they agree, they need to send an email directly to the OTRS team at from an email address that demonstrates that they are who they say they are. They need to list in the email address the url of each image that they agree to display and which license they have chosen. | |||
* For each image they agree to display, you put an {{tp|OTRS pending}} template on the file. | |||
* Let me know once this happens, and I will remove the deletion templates. If it happens after the tagged files are deleted, the OTRS volunteer who handles the request will undelete the files. -- ] (]) 05:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:You are most kind. I'll be in touch. Thank you! '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 08:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Request for the automated task == | |||
Hello Dianna. | |||
How are you? | |||
Although you are doing your daily admin tasks properly, but '''below''' is my humble request. | |||
If you think i have irked you with my requests before then my sincere apologies for those. | |||
Hereby i am requesting you for the deletion of non-used revisions for the below file : | |||
] | |||
Have a happy (day and editing). | |||
] (]) 11:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Thank you Dianna. ] (]) 10:50, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Slo-mo revert war == | |||
Would you please consider blocking this single-purpose account engaged in slo-mo revert war with everybody (experienced, long-term editors only)? There are no summaries. No reliable sources. No discussion. The user was already reported to ANI just recently, but I think, the case was closed prematurely. User {{User|Kaskusia}} probably thinks, it's a game. Thanks, ] ] 15:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Hi Poeticbent. I had already edited the article and thus am involved, and won't be issuing a block. However, I have restored the former lead to the article and I have put a message on the editor's talk page about COI, RS, and edit warring. I will watch-list -- ] (]) 16:14, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you, Dianna. If there's no improvement though, the 3RR report would probably be needed. ] ] 16:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: Thanks for fixing up my edit. It looks like I thought some content had been removed, but it had only been moved. -- ] (]) 18:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::You might also want to check out the ] for my newest report at the bottom. Thanks, ] ] 18:56, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Delete file history? == | |||
Hi Dianna. Can you delete the extra revisions of ] that are not the original upload? Looks like someone got the author and the actor mixed up at one point. The correct image is the one that is shown twice, at top and bottom. I'm also pretty sure the middle image should not be included for licensing reasons. Thanks. —<B>]</B> <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">]</sub> 21:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: All done. I don't think we have adequate permissions in place for the licenses that were on the file, so I have converted it to fair use. -- ] (]) 21:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Perfect, thanks. I stumbled upon that article circuitously, as I often do, and was sad to see he had died. I took a creative writing class from him back in 2001, and though I had a vague idea he was pretty important, I didn't realize what a fascinating and varied life he'd led. —<B>]</B> <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">]</sub> 21:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: He sounds like a really interesting guy. -- ] (]) 21:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::{{tps}} I disambiguated the Article= template parameter to head off future confusion. --] (]) 23:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::: Thanks. -- ] (]) 23:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::] was even smarter about it and DAB'd the file name. (chuckle). --] (]) 23:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Haha, no worries, between the three of us, we figured it out. —<B>]</B> <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">]</sub> 23:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Plant's Strider SPI == | |||
* I've started an SPI ], perhaps you would consider weighing-in on the socking likelyhood. ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 01:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
** In my opinion, you should put up at least a few of the most egregious diffs. Not too many though; just your best examples. -- ] (]) 01:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
*** I've now added some. Do you think that's enough, or should I add more? ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 01:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
**** I think you could just start with those, and put up a few more if requested. Be patient; like everywhere else, they're facing backlogs. -- ] (]) 01:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
***** It's already been declined. Will you please weigh-in there? ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 01:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
****** Check-user has been declined, and now an admin will review the behavioural evidence. I am not going to comment, because I feel too biased. -- ] (]) 01:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
******* I gotta go and rest for a while, but will probably be back on later. -- ] (]) 01:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
******** I think you have a named user account in mind as to who you think it is. There may be behavioural evidence that links the old named account to the new named account. You need to tell the SPI admins who you think it is. Do so by email. Send it to User:DoRD. This is all a suggestion though it's worded like an order. I am just tired and unable to pretend to be Japanese at the moment -- ] (]) 05:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
********* {{t|ygm}}. ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 06:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Problem with user == | |||
This ] has a habit of disturbing ] unnecessarily.He dont even care about warnings and comments.] <sup>]</sup> 23:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== RevDel request == | |||
Hi Diannaa, don't know if you're still up, but Neil Young might need a revdel . Thanks, <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">] ]</span> 06:01, 27 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Got it. Good catch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0t0EW6z8a0 -- ] (]) 06:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:38, 6 January 2025
There are currently 9 open reports at CopyPatrol. Purge |
Talk page archive |
---|
Send me no flowers |
List
|
User undid all my contributions
The user user:CurryTime7-24 keeps removing all my contributions and first I tried not to take it personally but now I'm feeling hounded. I added contributions to some articles, added the sources and he removed all of my edits simply because he didn't like the sourced link. He suggested IMSLP, which doesn't even have information about the text I added. Now it's a back and forth of him removing my entire contributions, regardless of what's inside. Right now he's removing the one I had added after you told me to review it, which I did. https://en.wikipedia.org/Psycho_(1960_film) He's moved onto every other revision I made and it's turning into an editing war. Please advise. John40332 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like all the additions use www.sheetmusicx.com as a citation. Do you have any assocuation with that website? --Diannaa (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't, they're the only publisher releasing those works, that's why information about those pieces is so scarce. John40332 (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The website does not appear to be the official publisher for any of these scores. For sure they are not the official publishers for the Herrmann and Shostakovich works that John40322 added the link to. The company that they cite to also appears to be brand new. I haven't looked through all of its catalog, but a lot of its scores do not appear to even be available for sale until next year. None of these works are obscure. So it's odd that this editor chooses to cite a very obscure music publisher.
- Some of this user's edits are also perhaps unintentionally misleading. This edit at Tahiti Trot suggested that the site they linked to was the first to publish the original score and parts. This would be incorrect, as previously existing sources in the article already confirm. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The "obscure" publisher has been in business for over a decade and is a respectable publisher
- https://daniels-orchestral.com/other-resources/publishers/s/
- Their publishings go back to 2010 https://recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/Home/Search?q=STRAUSS&num=25&start=0&enviro=prod&DateBucket=2010-2019%7C2010&DataSource=Library
- I don't, they're the only publisher releasing those works, that's why information about those pieces is so scarce. John40332 (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
The website registration shows 2010 in fact https://lookup.icann.org/en/lookup
- I don't know why you specifically have to be convinced of it in order for edits to stick, but I'm done even trying, just because you don't know something doesn't mean it's fake or dubious, it's people like you that make editing on Misplaced Pages so unpleasant. John40332 (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- You need to discuss this somewhere else please. Diannaa (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The user:CurryTime7-24 continues harassing me and WP:HOUNDING, if I edit 4 articles he goes right there to undo what I edit, regardless of the content, you just have to see his history where he goes around reverting whatever I touch. Now he is trying to report me as a bot, when I'm clearly not one. At this point I'd like to know if there's a way to stop him from interacting with my edits, or some temporary block on him? He's making editing on Misplaced Pages very unfriendly and acts like he owns it WP:OWN. I cited proper sources in my edits, I don't know why he's been targeting me but it's exhausting. John40332 (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is already being discussed at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Classical music and Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Sorry but I don't have time to get involved. It's an edit war orver the reliability of a particular website, and I don't have time to get into that.--Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The user:CurryTime7-24 continues harassing me and WP:HOUNDING, if I edit 4 articles he goes right there to undo what I edit, regardless of the content, you just have to see his history where he goes around reverting whatever I touch. Now he is trying to report me as a bot, when I'm clearly not one. At this point I'd like to know if there's a way to stop him from interacting with my edits, or some temporary block on him? He's making editing on Misplaced Pages very unfriendly and acts like he owns it WP:OWN. I cited proper sources in my edits, I don't know why he's been targeting me but it's exhausting. John40332 (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You need to discuss this somewhere else please. Diannaa (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know why you specifically have to be convinced of it in order for edits to stick, but I'm done even trying, just because you don't know something doesn't mean it's fake or dubious, it's people like you that make editing on Misplaced Pages so unpleasant. John40332 (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Backendgaming sockpuppets
Hi Diannaa, I am asking for your opinion on this subject because you were an admin that dealt with the SPI case against Backendgaming. Since the last recorded incidents from 2018, I noticed there were further potential sockpuppet accounts made since then, including the following:
All of which display a notable overlap in edit style and choice of topic with Backendgaming. Although some have not been used recently, and the others have been recently blocked for personal attacks against other editors, my question is whether you think it is worth doing a checkuser on these accounts as sockpuppets of Backendgaming? If identified as socks, it would help in watching over articles that tends to be targeted, help identify further socks as Backendgaming remains actively editing, and may help to undo a lot the disruptive edits already made. Any thoughts on this are appreciated. Thanks. 37.0.81.237 (talk) 10:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know mich about this topic. Please go to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Backendgaming to file your report. Thanks, Diannaa (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Wikizilla; copyright or not?
Hi Diannaa! Happy almost new year :) I see that you removed and revdeleted content at Shin Godzilla (character) from Wikizilla stating that it wasn't compatible and then later on at Tiamat (Godzilla) declined the G12 and attributed it. Do you think it's ultimately compatible? I see that it's been removed and revdelled at Kong (Monsterverse) additionally, and I just reverted a removal at User:GojiraFan1954/sandbox/Goro Maki myself, so it seems like we're all off-base and I thought I'd get another opinion. Sennecaster (Chat) 04:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Sennecaster, that's a good question. Their copyright page is hard to find, so I bookmarked it. Here it is. Diannaa (talk) 09:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Request for Assistance
You are an administrator that I respect, @Diannaa. If possible, I would value your contribution to the Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Palestinian political violence (3rd nomination). It would mean a lot to have your third-party, experienced perspective. Firecat93 (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Interactive Artificial inteligence
Greeting i am a university student and was tasked with creating a wikipedia page creating a new page in wiki pedia in the path of expanding information. i choosed "interactive artificial intelligence" as my topic and used the article "Interactive AI With Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Next Generation Networking" written by Ruichen Zhang , Hongyang Du , Yinqiu Liu , Dusit Niyato , Jiawen Kang , Sumei Sun , Xuemin Shen , and H. Vincent Poor as a source but i was striked as advertisement ban the second time i tried to publish the article i got permanently ban. i want to ask for an reconsideration for uploading my article as i did not aim for any advertising and only stated IAI advancements againts traditional tools.
thank you for reading. Iliya izj (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't find your deleted article, and you don't have any deleted contributions under the username user:Iliya izj. Please tell me which account you were using when you created the article. Were you actually banned or blocked? What was the exact title of your article? or was it in a sandbox, or a draft? Diannaa (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think they mean Draft:Interactive AI. Nobody (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, that's it. The draft was deleted twice, because it was copied from this journal article, which is not compatibly licensed. That's a violation of our copyright policy. Then there's Draft:هوش مصنوعی تعاملی, which is another copy, but in Persian. @Iliya izj, please don't add copyright material to Misplaced Pages. Diannaa (talk) 12:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- OP blocked as a block-evading sockpuppet of blocked spammer/copyvio'er, Iliya IZ. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Yamla, case closed, at least for now. Diannaa (talk) 12:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- OP blocked as a block-evading sockpuppet of blocked spammer/copyvio'er, Iliya IZ. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, that's it. The draft was deleted twice, because it was copied from this journal article, which is not compatibly licensed. That's a violation of our copyright policy. Then there's Draft:هوش مصنوعی تعاملی, which is another copy, but in Persian. @Iliya izj, please don't add copyright material to Misplaced Pages. Diannaa (talk) 12:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think they mean Draft:Interactive AI. Nobody (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Request for Guidance on Recreating the Draft:European Magnetism Association Page
Hello Diannaa, I am not the original creator of the deleted page, but I am part of the team and we are working on reworking the Draft:European Magnetism Association page, which was previously deleted due to copyright concerns. We are currently preparing a new draft with fully original content and I would like to ensure that it aligns with Misplaced Pages's guidelines. Could you kindly advise me on how best to proceed? Thank you for your time and assistance. Kind regards, Evgenia EmJal (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I see that you've already created a new draft, and have copied a bunch of stuff from the association's website. That's not okay. Please see your talk page for what to do next.Diannaa (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi
Hello Diannaa: I'm Jean Mercier. I need your help. Some people accuse me of being a puppet of someone else who has my name. These people have weak evidence against me while I have already proven that I am not that guy. To make matters worse, they blocked me. Please help me. 2800:484:738F:15F0:25C0:47EF:549A:C1F1 (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)