| Revision as of 17:29, 1 February 2013 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 edits →JoshuSasori?← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 13 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,932 edits →The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{talk header}} |
|
{{talk header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|
|counter = 17 |
|
|
|algo = old(48h) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:TParis/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{tmbox |
|
{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{tmbox |
|
|small = {{{small|}}} |
|
|small = {{{small|}}} |
| Line 13: |
Line 18: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:TParis/Nav}} |
|
{{User:TParis/Nav}} |
|
|
{{semi-retired}} |
|
__TOC__ |
|
__TOC__ |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|
|counter = 9 |
|
|
|algo = old(48h) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:TParis/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
|
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
|
== VPP comment hiding == |
|
|
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
|
{| style="clear:both;" |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|
Just saw your reversion of Kosh's inappropriate use of the collapse template on your comment. This has been a longstanding problem with him, explained over and over but he refuses to get it. See ] and elsewhere in his talk page history. ''']''' ('']'') 19:30, 28 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|
:"refuses to get it" summarizes his approach to ''any'' piece of information that contradicts with his rigid, ill informed view of WP. ] (]) 19:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|
|
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|
::I don't particularly care about the comment. The person who was intended to see it responded already. If he wants it boxed, he should get an uninvolved editor to do it. I wouldn't argue about such a thing.--v/r - ]] 19:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
:::As an isoated incident I agree it si not worth making a big deal about. However, as part of a seemingly unbreakable pattern of ] behavior it is concerning. Part of the problem is that it is o frustrating to try and reason with him that users seem to give up and walk away, and of course I was unable to get him to leave me alone and that led to the unpleasantness lest week that the discussion was about to begin with. ] (]) 19:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Yeah, Kosh has made me rethink my opinion of Malleus a bit in the sense that my short conversation with Kosh almost led to me joining you in the corner last week.--v/r - ]] 19:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
== ygm == |
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 223, November 2024 == |
|
{{YGM|dashlesssig=—<span style="border:1px solid;border-radius:1.5em 0em"><span style="background:#000;border-radius:1.5em 0 0"> ]-</span> ] </span> 22:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
== X!'s Edit Counter: K7L does not exist. == |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
{| |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1256183913 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards == |
|
I do exist... really I do... ]. Yet http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php?name=K7L&lang=en&wiki=wikivoyage fails with "K7L does not exist." ] (]) 00:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:The Wikivoyage database replication has issues, it's not an edit counter issue.--v/r - ]] 00:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks... sorry to have bothered you about this. ] (]) 00:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting is now open for the ] ] and ] awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes ] and ] respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via ] (]) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Your .02 real quick == |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1259903100 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Always precious == |
|
I was just stopping by to get ] on something real quick since I'm kind of noobish in some regards. So, I tagged ] for what I think is a lack of notability according to ]. I was wondering if I did things right by tagging it and explaining why I tagged it on the talk page. Also, I noticed a member of the unit created the article as well when I took a look at the article history. Should/could I have done anything else do you think? I appreciate the help/feedback. (I also asked Bwmoll3 for his input too just to grab another opinion)—<span style="border:1px solid;border-radius:1.5em 0em"><span style="background:#000;border-radius:1.5em 0 0"> ]-</span> ] </span> 16:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] |
|
:I would say per ] that this squadron isn't notable. First off, it reads as promotional. But besides that, when the guidelines speaks of squadrons, it is speaking of aviation squadrons; not weather squadrons. A general rule of thumb for Air Force units is Wing or higher. Groups and Squadrons are generally not notable unless they are covered in 3rd party sources. A notable squadron would be ]. On the other hand, with a little bit of cleanup to remove the promotional stuff, it's not really hurting anything and ] isn't a guideline.--v/r - ]] 16:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 07:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I remember that! I believe this was also the same day that ] hit the front page for the first time too. Thank you! v/r - ]] 14:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 224, December 2024 == |
|
Did you see that? It appears that, after the RfC/U on Epeefleche wasn't going his way, Danjel is attempting to discredit the people who disagree with him. He's basically mentioned every single participant in the RfC/U except you and me. Dude needs to drop the stick and back away, and we need to get that interaction ban in place ASAP <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">]]]</span> 17:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:I agree that Danjel has been beating the caucus a little hard, but User:Rachack does seem a bit suspicious.--v/r - ]] 18:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
== I disagree == |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
{| |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
* Op-ed: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1264992348 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 225, January 2025 == |
|
Hi TP. Hopefully you'll remember that I am often in full agreement with you on a great many things; and that I greatly appreciate what you do on a daily basis in real life. I found something that I took exception to however. I waited until the last day because it's not my intent to try to change your mind in the least, just something that made me do a double-take. At a recent RfA (Jason's) I noticed that you seemed to equate "bored" with "disillusioned". Now as you said, I didn't take it as "offensive", but I do think the two things are ''VERY'' far apart; or at least can be in many instances. I did read through once more a lot of Jason's posts, and I didn't get any sense of "disillusioned" in the least. I was wondering if there was anything in particular that made you feel that way, or was it just a general impression? Granted this is not an important (even in the wiki world) question, so if you're pressed for time, feel free to make this a very low priority question. Hope all is well with you and yours. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 20:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:I suppose it's based off my own experience. I was much more enthusiastic about the project pre-RFA and I became disillusioned once I really got into it's working and that has contributed to a lack of interest and boredom. I got the same vibe from him.--v/r - ]] 20:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Interesting .. to be perfectly honest - I've very often become disillusioned with the project in many ways over time. It can be a tough feeling to overcome at times. (for me at least). Anyway .. I just wanted to drop the note. Take care. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 21:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
==JoshuSasori?== |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
Hey TP, I'm concerned that {{user2|123.225.49.155}} is a sock of the indef blocked ]. The account advanced the same position as Joshu in this debate, in very similar language. I was involved in the previous discussion so I'll keep it an an arm's length, but could you take a look?--] ]/] 15:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{| |
|
:It was definitely him.--v/r - ]] 15:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| ] |
|
::Thanks for the quick action, TP.] ]/] 16:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
:::Does Cullen's Hound count as a vote if he/she <small>(I've interacted with Cuchullain far too many times to not be able to use a pronoun (>_<) )</small> participated extensively last time but refrains this time? As I said in my second nom, I'm concerned that the first one only failed because JS interfering (following me...) made it look like the consensus was under question, but if it's just me and IIO against Kauffner this time, the same thing will happen again... |
|
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
:::Also, if the Anon is JS, it seems likely that a number of the others (]) are, and that means he probably has one of those dynamic IP things, which means blocking one will not help in the long run. |
|
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
:::] (]) 17:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
::::If the IPs continue, we can consider a rangeblock. As far as Chchullain's !vote, he can make one if he chooses too. I wouldn't get into trying to claim those !votes now if I were you.--v/r - ]] |
|
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
:::::Gotcha. As far as the IPs go, one of them (in the only edit it had made) gave a decent enough argument that it is not JS. Apparently both JS and I voted against him/her in a move request before JS was banned. However, I'm still not sure: this person (whether or not he/she is JS) seems to only be concerned with voting on page moves, but not having a consistent user-name makes it extremely frustrating. ] (]) 17:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* Op-ed: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 07:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1266423875 --> |
