Misplaced Pages

Race and intelligence: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:58, 18 May 2006 view sourceNectarflowed (talk | contribs)5,007 edits Average test score gaps among races: rm description moved above← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:37, 5 January 2025 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,433,358 edits Added work. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Eastmain | #UCB_webform 307/454 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Discussions and claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines}}
] showing results of studies comparing ]s and ]s with ] among U.S. test subjects show differences in average test scores, though the ] overlap, as seen in this graph based on {{AYref|Reynolds et al.|1987}} (see ] for further references). The causes and meaning of the different average scores for these groups are debated.]]
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{pp|small=yes}}
<noinclude>{{Race}}</noinclude>


Discussions of '''race and intelligence''' – specifically regarding claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines – have appeared in both ] and ] since the modern concept of ] was first introduced. With the inception of ] in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups have been observed, though these differences have fluctuated and in many cases steadily decreased over time. Complicating the issue, modern science has concluded that race is a ] phenomenon rather than a biological reality, and there exist various conflicting definitions of ]. In particular, the ] as a metric for ] is disputed. Today, the scientific consensus is that ] does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin.
'''Race and intelligence''' is a controversial area of ] research studying the nature, origins, and practical consequences of racial and ethnic group differences in ] scores and other measures of ] ability.<ref>Researchers contributing to this area of inquiry mostly include ], ], ], ], and ].</ref> This research is grounded in several controversial assumptions:
*the social categories of ] and ] are ] with ] categories, such as ].
*] is measurable (see ]) and is dominated by a unitary ].


] claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have played a central role in the history of ]. The first tests showing differences in IQ scores between different population groups in the United States were the tests of ] recruits in ]. In the 1920s, groups of ] lobbyists argued that these results demonstrated that ] and certain immigrant groups were of inferior intellect to ] ], and that this was due to innate biological differences. In turn, they used such beliefs to justify policies of ]. However, other studies soon appeared, contesting these conclusions and arguing that the Army tests had not adequately controlled for environmental factors, such as socioeconomic and educational ].
Much of the evidence currently cited is based on ] testing in the United States. While the distributions of IQ scores among different racial-ethnic groups overlap considerably, groups differ in where their members cluster along the IQ scale.<ref name="IQdistribution"> {{AYref|Reynolds et al.|1987}}; {{AYref|Roth et al.|2001}}; {{AYref|Rushton|2000}}; {{AYref|Shuey|1958}}; {{AYref|Herrnstein and Murray|1994}}; {{AYref|Lynn|1991a}}. For samples of individual studies showing similar results, see the , reported by {{AYref|Broman et al.|1987}}; the ] reported by {{AYref|Weinberg et al.|1992}}; also {{AYref|Lynn|1977a}}, {{AYref|Lynn|1977b}}, {{AYref|Lynn|1982}}, {{AYref|Lynn|1987}}, {{AYref|Lynn|1991a}}; {{AYref|Lynn et al.|1991}}; {{AYref|Lynn and Hampson|1986a}} {{AYref|Lynn and Hampson|1986b}}; {{AYref|Lynn et al.|1987a}}, {{AYref|Lynn et al.|1987b}}; {{AYref|Lynn et al.|1988}}; {{AYref|Lynn and Holmshaw|1990}}; {{AYref|Lynn and Shigehasa|1991}}; {{AYref|Montie and Fagan|1988}}; {{AYref|Rushton|1997}}; {{AYref|Rushton and Jensen|2003}}; {{AYref|Rushton et al.|2003}}; {{AYref|Notcutt|1950}}; {{AYref|Jensen|1993}}; {{AYref|Jensen and Reynolds|1982}}; {{AYref|Peoples et al.|1995}}. For scientific consensus statements see {{AYref|Gottfredson|1997a}} and {{AYref|Neisser et al.|1996}}.</ref> Similar clustering occurs with related variables, such as ], ], and ], and the gap shows up before age 3 on most standardized tests after matching for variables such as maternal education.<ref> Other clustering: {{AYref|Thernstrom and Thernstrom|2003}}; {{AYref|Roth et al.|2001}}; {{AYref|Jensen|1993}}; {{AYref|Jensen and Whang|1994}}; {{AYref|Lynn and Holmshaw|1990}}; {{AYref|Lynn and Shigehasa|1991}}; {{AYref|Ho et al.|1980a}}, {{AYref|Ho et al.|1980b}}; {{AYref|Harvey_et_al.|1994}}; {{AYref|Rushton|1991}}. The East-Asian/White/Black difference in average IQ can be measured in very young children. For example, a one standard deviation gap is observed in Black and White 3-year olds matched for gender, birth order, and maternal education ({{AYref|Peoples et al.|1995}}). {{AYref|Lynn|1996}} found that by age 6 the average IQ of East Asian children is 107, 103 for White children and 89 for Black children. {{A(Y)ref|Broman et al.|1987}} found that the same trichotomy in brain size and IQ held at 4 months, 1 year, and 7 years of age.</ref> Most ] in IQ in the U.S. occurs within individual families, not between races. However, even small differences in average IQ at the group level might theoretically have large effects on social outcomes. For example, a randomly selected group of Americans with an average IQ of 103 had a ] 25% lower than a group with an average IQ of 100. Similar substantial correlations in high school drop-out rates, crime rates, and other outcomes have been measured.<ref>For this calculation, ] and ] alter the mean IQ (100) of the U.S. ]'s population sample by randomly deleting individuals below an IQ of 103 until the population mean reaches 103. This calculation was conducted twice and averaged together to avoid error from the random selection.({{AYref|Herrnstein_and_Murray|1994}}, pp. 364-368) Discussed further in the section ].</ref>


Later observations of phenomena such as the ] and disparities in access to ] highlighted ways in which environmental factors affect group IQ differences. In recent decades, as understanding of ] has advanced, claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have been broadly rejected by scientists on both ] and ] grounds.
Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain racial-ethnic group differences in IQ. Certain environmental factors, such as ], are thought to modulate IQ in children<ref>Whether or not this carries over to adulthood remains to be investigated.</ref>, and other influences have been hypothesized, including education level, richness of the early home environment, and other social, cultural, or economic factors. The primary focus of the scientific debate is whether group IQ differences also reflect a genetic component. ] hypothesizes that a ] could include genes linked to neuron structure or function, ] or metabolism, or other physiological differences which could vary with biogeographic ancestry.


== History of the controversy ==
The findings of this field are often thought to conflict with fundamental social philosophies, and have thus engendered a large controversy. Some of the researchers who publically argue for the partly genetic hypothesis have received grants from the ], which has been accused of ] by some scientists and the ]. Other scientists, such as ], argue unnecessary fear of the implications of the science of human nature has led to large swaths of the intellectual landscape being reengineered to deny fundamental aspects of human nature. Media portrayal of the role of genetic and environmental factors in explaining individual and group differences in IQ was shown in a 1988 study to be misleading regarding mainstream expert opinion. Some critics examine the fairness and validity of cognitive testing and racial categorization, as well as the reliability of the studies and the motives of the authors, on both sides. Some critics fear the misuse of the research, question its ], and feel that comparing the intelligence of racial groups is itself ]. For instance, the disparity in average IQ among racial groups is sometimes mistaken for the idea that all members of one race are more intelligent than all members of another, or that ranking group IQ averages from "high" to "low" implies a moral ranking of races from "good" to "bad" or an overall ranking of "superior" to "inferior". The conclusion that some racial groups have lower average IQ scores, and the hypothesis that a genetic component may be involved, have led to heated academic debates that have spilled over into the public sphere.
{{Main|History of the race and intelligence controversy}}
{{See also|Scientific racism}}
] and abolitionist ] (1817–1895) served as a high-profile counterexample to myths of black intellectual inferiority.]]
Claims of differences in intelligence between races have been used to justify ], ], ], ], and racial ]s. Claims of intellectual inferiority were used to justify British wars and colonial campaigns in Asia.<ref name="Mercer-2023">{{Cite web |last=Mercer |first=Jonathan |date=October 1, 2023 |title=Racism, Stereotypes, and War |url=https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/48/2/7/118111/Racism-Stereotypes-and-War |access-date=2024-02-04 |website=direct.mit.edu |publisher=Journal of International Security}}</ref> Racial thinkers such as ] in France relied crucially on the assumption that black people were innately inferior to white people in developing their ideologies of ]. Even ] thinkers such as ], a slave owner, believed black people to be innately inferior to white people in physique and intellect.{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|p=23}} At the same time in the United States, prominent examples of African-American genius such the ] and abolitionist ], the pioneering sociologist ], and the poet ] stood as high-profile counterexamples to widespread stereotypes of black intellectual inferiority.<ref name="LawsonKirkland1999">Stewart, Roderick M. 1999. "The Claims of Frederick Douglass Philosophically Considered." Pp. 155–56 in ''Frederick Douglass: A Critical Reader'', edited by B. E. Lawson and F. M. Kirkland. Wiley-Blackwell. {{ISBN|978-0-631-20578-4}}. "Moreover, though he does not make the point explicitly, again the very fact that Douglass is ably disputing this argument on this occasion celebrating a select few's intellect and will (or moral character)—this fact constitutes a living counterexample to the narrowness of the pro-slavery definition of humans."</ref><ref>Marable, Manning (2011), ''Living Black History: How Reimagining the African-American Past Can Remake America's Racial Future'', p. 96. {{ISBN|978-0-465-04395-8}}.</ref> In Britain, Japan's military victory over Russia in the ]<ref name="Mercer-2023" /> began to reverse negative stereotypes of "oriental" inferiority.<ref name="Tonooka-2017">{{Cite journal |last=Tonooka |first=Chika |date=2017 |title=Reverse Emulation and the Cult of Japanese Efficiency in Edwardian Britain |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26343378 |journal=The Historical Journal |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=95–119 |doi=10.1017/S0018246X15000539 |jstor=26343378 |s2cid=162698331 |issn=0018-246X}}</ref> ] (1857–1911), inventor of the first intelligence test|alt=|left]]


=== Early IQ testing ===
{{Message_box|
The first practical intelligence test, the ], was developed between 1905 and 1908 by ] and ] in France for school placement of children. Binet warned that results from his test should not be assumed to measure innate intelligence or used to label individuals permanently.{{sfn|Plotnik|Kouyoumdjian|2011}} Binet's test was translated into English and revised in 1916 by ] (who introduced IQ scoring for the test results) and published under the name ]. In 1916 Terman wrote that Mexican-Americans, African-Americans, and Native Americans have a mental "dullness seems to be racial, or at least inherent in the family stocks from which they come."<ref>{{cite book |last=Terman |first=Lewis |title=The Measurement Of Intelligence |publisher=Houghton, Mifflin and Company |year=1916 |page=91 |oclc=557712625}}</ref>
id =totallydisputed|
backgroundcolor =Pink|
image =Stop_hand.svg|
heading =The ] and ] of this article are disputed.|
message = This tag is supported by 1 "con" editor and considered inappropriate by 1 "con" editor and 2 "pro" editors. Please see the relevant discussion on the ].}}<includeonly>
</includeonly><noinclude>
{{Race and intelligence vertical navbox}}
== Background information ==
===Race===
{{Main|Race}} | ''See also: ]''
Racial distinctions are generally made on the basis of skin color, facial features, inferred ancestry, national origin and self-identification. In an ongoing debate, some geneticists argue race is neither a meaningful concept nor a useful ] device,<ref>{{AYref|Wilson et al.|2001}}, {{AYref|Cooper et al.|2003}} (given in {{AYref|Bamshad et al.|2004}}'s summary, p.599)</ref> and even that genetic differences between groups are biologically meaningless,<ref>{{AYref|Schwartz|2001}}, {{AYref|Stephens|2003}} (given in {{AYref|Bamshad et al.|2004}}'s summary, p. 599)</ref> on the basis of that more genetic variation exists within such races than between them<ref>It is well established that within-population genetic diversity is greatest within Sub-Saharan Africa, and decreases with distance from Africa. One study estimates that only 6.3% of the total human genetic diversity is explained by race. This value is comparable to other reports which find that on average approximately 85% of genetic variation occurs within populations. In a hypothetical situation with two populations and a single ] with two ]s, this is equivalent to allele frequencies of 30% + 70% in one population and 70% + 30% in the other. Thus, using this single gene to classify individuals into populations would result in a 30% misclassification rate.</ref>, and that racial traits overlap without discrete boundaries.<ref>{{AYref|Sternberg et al.|2005}}, {{AYref|Suzuki and Aronson|2005}}, {{AYref|Smedley and Smedley|2005}}, {{AYref|Helms et al.|2005}}, . Lewontin, for example argues that there is no biological basis for race on the basis of research indicating that more genetic variation exists within such races than between them {{AYref|Lewontin|1972}}. <br><br> Some critics of race may not consider this a problem for race and intelligence inquiries. ], who praises ]'s genetics research over the decades for "demolishing scientists' attempts to classify human populations into races in the same way that they classify birds and other species into races"({{AYref|Diamond|2000}}), also argues "in mental ability New Guineans are probably genetically superior to Westerners" due to that intelligence was likely selected for in hunter-gatherer ] societies where the challenges were tribal warfare and food procurement, compared with high population density European civilizations where the major survival pressure was on genes for resisting ]s (], p.21).</ref>
Other geneticists, in contrast, argue that categories of self-identified race/ethnicity or ] are both valid and useful <ref>{{AYref|Risch et al.|2002}}, {{AYref|Bamshad|2005}}. ] argues: "One could make the same arguments about sex and age! . . you can undermine any definitional system. . . In a recent study. . . we actually had a higher discordance rate between self-reported sex and markers on the X chromosome between genetic structure versus self-description, 99.9% concordance. . . So you could argue that sex is also a problematic category. And there are differences between sex and gender; self-identification may not be correlated with biology perfectly. And there is sexism. And you can talk about age the same way. A person's chronological age does not correspond perfectly with his biological age for a variety of reasons, both inherited and non-inherited. Perhaps just using someone's actual birth year is not a very good way of measuring age. Does that mean we should throw it out? . . . Any category you come up with is going to be imperfect, but that doesn't preclude you from using it or the fact that it has utility" ({{AYref|Gitschier|2005}}).</ref>, that these categories correspond with clusters ]<ref>{{AYref|Harpending and Rogers|2000}}, {{AYref|Bamshad et al.|2003}}, {{AYref|Edwards|2003}}, {{AYref|Bamshad et al.|2004}}, {{AYref|Tang et al.|2005}}, {{AYref|Rosenberg et al.|2005}}: "If enough markers are used... individuals can be partitioned into genetic clusters that match major geographic subdivisions of the globe".</ref>, and that this correspondence implies that genetic factors might contribute to unexplained phenotypic variation between groups<ref>{{AYref|Mountain and Risch|2004}}</ref>.


The US Army used a different set of tests developed by ] to evaluate draftees for World War I. Based on the Army's data, prominent psychologists and eugenicists such as ], ], and Princeton professor ] wrote that people from southern and eastern Europe were less intelligent than native-born Americans or immigrants from the Nordic countries, and that black Americans were less intelligent than white Americans.{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|page=116}} The results were widely publicized by a lobby of anti-immigration activists, including the conservationist and theorist of ] ], who considered the so-called ] to be superior, but under threat because of immigration by "inferior breeds." In his influential work, ''A Study of American Intelligence,'' psychologist ] used the results of the Army tests to argue for a stricter immigration policy, limiting immigration to countries considered to belong to the "Nordic race".{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|pages=116, 309}}
It is well known that many ]s vary in frequency across human populations. While most of this variation is ] and has no obvious phenotypic effect, a significant portion of human genes do show evidence of recent ], leading to functional differences between populations. Recent studies have shown that some genes involved in brain development and other neuronal functions have variants that have spread to high frequencies under selective pressure and now occur in substantially different frequencies in different global populations.<ref name="brain alleles">{{AYref|Mekel-Bobrov et al.|2005}}, {{AYref|Evans et al.|2005}}, {{AYref|Voight et al.|2006}}, {{AYref|Wang et al.|2005}}, {{AYref|Harpending and Cochran|2002}}. The neural ] gene studied in Harpending and Cochran, previously found to occur in substantially different worldwide frequencies, is also tied to behavior, with bearers displaying greater novelty-seeking behavior and being at increased risk for ]. Harpending and Cochran suggest this gene "may be a model system for understanding the relationship between genetic variation and human cultural diversity," noting high frequencies in South American Indians, such as the ] (sometimes referred to as "the Fierce People"), intermediate frequencies in Europeans and Africans, and very low frequencies in East Asians and ] (sometimes referred to as "the Harmless People"). {{AYref|Moehler et al.|2006}}, another study discussing behavioral variation, finds significantly higher behavioral inhibition in native German children with blonde hair, and slightly higher inhibition in American caucasian children with blue eyes, compared with a statistically insignificant increase in inhibition in German children with blue eyes. <br><br> See the NYTimes' (September 8, 2005), and (March 7, 2006) for discussion of Mekel-Bobrov et al. and Evans et al., and Voight et al.</ref> However, their effect, if any, on IQ is unknown. (Discussed ].)


In the 1920s, some US states enacted ] laws, such as Virginia's ], which established the ] (of ']') as law. Many scientists reacted negatively to eugenicist claims linking abilities and moral character to racial or genetic ancestry. They pointed to the contribution of environment (such as speaking English as a second language) to test results.{{sfn|Pickren|Rutherford|2010|p=163}} By the mid-1930s, many psychologists in the US had adopted the view that environmental and cultural factors played a dominant role in IQ test results. The psychologist Carl Brigham repudiated his own earlier arguments, explaining that he had come to realize that the tests were not a measure of innate intelligence.{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|page=145}}
Worldwide, human populations are geographically bounded into five less than perfectly distinct continental areas: the Americas, Eurasia (including Europe, North Africa and West Asia), East Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Pacific Islands (including Australia). At least for subjects of biomedical research in the ], self-identified racials labels correspond to geographic regions of genetic ancestry, with only a small number of individuals showing genetic cluster membership different from their self-identified race/ethnicity.<ref>{{AYref|Tang et al.|2005}}</ref> People labeled '']'' have most of their ancestors from sub-Saharan Africa, '']'' from Europe (and sometimes the Middle East and North Africa), and '']'' from the north-western Pacific Rim. '']'' form a genetically diverse group that includes many recent U.S. immigrants of mixed ancestry, and are more often called an ].


Discussions of the issue in the United States, especially in the writings of Madison Grant, influenced ] ] claims that the "Nordics" were a "]."{{sfn|Spiro|2009}} As American public sentiment shifted against the Germans, claims of racial differences in intelligence increasingly came to be regarded as problematic.<ref name="Ludy 2006">{{harvnb|Ludy|2006}}</ref> Anthropologists such as ], ], and ] did much to demonstrate that claims about racial hierarchies of intelligence were unscientific.{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|pages=130–32}} Nonetheless, a powerful eugenics and segregation lobby funded largely by textile-magnate ] continued to use intelligence studies as an argument for eugenics, segregation, and anti-immigration legislation.{{sfn|Tucker|2002}}
The political, social and cultural structure of the United States is still weighted by race. It was only in the 1960s that racial discrimination became illegal in many areas of public and private life, including employment and housing, and some consider discrimination to remain prevalent. The national and state governments of the United States employ racial categorization in the census, law enforcement, and innumerable other ways. Many political organizations intend to represent the interests of specific racial groups. See the articles ] and ] for further discussion.


=== The Pioneer Fund and ''The Bell Curve'' ===
===Intelligence testing===
As the desegregation of the American South gained traction in the 1950s, debate about black intelligence resurfaced. ], funded by Draper's ], published a new analysis of Yerkes' tests, concluding that black people really were of inferior intellect to white people. This study was used by segregationists to argue that it was to the advantage of black children to be educated separately from the superior white children.{{sfn|Jackson|2005}} In the 1960s, the debate was revived when ] publicly defended the view that black children were innately unable to learn as well as white children.{{sfn|Shurkin|2006}} ] expressed similar opinions in his '']'' article, "]," which questioned the value of ] for African-American children.{{sfn|Jensen|1969|pages=1–123}} He suggested that poor educational performance in such cases reflected an underlying genetic cause rather than lack of stimulation at home or other environmental factors.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Panofsky |first1=Aaron |title=Misbehaving Science. Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics |publisher=] |location=Chicago |isbn=978-0-226-05831-3 |date=2014}}</ref>{{sfn|Alland|2002|pages=79–80}}
{{Main|Intelligence quotient}}
] is most commonly measured using IQ tests. These tests are often geared to be good measures of the ] variable ''''']''''', and other tests that measure ''g'' (for example, the ] and the ]) also serve as measures of cognitive ability.


Another revival of public debate followed the appearance of '']'' (1994), a book by ] and ] that supported the general viewpoint of Jensen.{{sfn|Herrnstein|Murray|1994}} A statement in support of Herrnstein and Murray titled "]," was published in '']'' with 52 signatures. ''The Bell Curve'' also led to critical responses in a statement titled "]" of the American Psychological Association and in several books, including '']'' (1995), '']'' (1996) and a second edition of '']'' (1996) by ].<ref name="Maltby, Day & Macaskill 2007"/><ref name="Mackintosh 1998">{{harvnb|Mackintosh|1998}}</ref>
All such tests are often called "intelligence tests," though the use of the term "intelligence" is itself controversial. It is clear, however, that performance in these tests accurately predicts performance in similar life tasks (typical college courses, for example). The correlation with many real-world results is lower. For example, while the correlation of IQ with job performance is strong, income is modestly correlated and accumulated ] is only weakly correlated. The genetic transmission of wealth via IQ is near zero. As commonly used, "IQ test" denotes any test of cognitive ability, and "IQ" is used as shorthand for scores on tests of cognitive ability. Some critics question the validity of all IQ testing or claim that there are aspects of "intelligence" not reflected in IQ tests. Historically, criticisms of the validity of IQ testing focused primarily on questions of "test bias", which has many related meanings. Several conclusions about tests of cognitive ability are now largely accepted:
* IQ scores measure many, but not all of the qualities that people mean by ''intelligent'' or ''smart'' (for example, IQ does not measure creativity, wisdom, or personality)
* IQ scores are fairly stable over much of a person's life
* IQ tests are predictive of school and job performance, to a degree that does not significantly vary by socio-economic or racial-ethnic background
* For people living in the prevailing conditions of the developed world, cognitive ability is substantially ], and while the impact of family environment on the IQ of children is substantial, after adolescence this effect becomes difficult to detect.


Some of the authors proposing genetic explanations for group differences have received funding from the ], which was headed by ] until his death in 2012.{{sfn|Tucker|2002}}<ref name="Maltby, Day & Macaskill 2007">{{harvnb|Maltby|Day|Macaskill|2007}}</ref>{{sfn|Graves|2002a}}{{sfn|Graves|2002b}}<ref>{{harvnb|Grossman|Kaufman|2001}}</ref> Arthur Jensen, who jointly with Rushton published a 2005 review article arguing that the difference in average IQs between blacks and whites is partly due to genetics, received $1.1 million in grants from the Pioneer Fund.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adam |first1=Miller |year=1994 |title=The Pioneer Fund: Bankrolling the Professors of Hate |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2962466 |journal=The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education |issue=6 |pages=58–61 |doi=10.2307/2962466|jstor=2962466 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Blakemore |first1=Bill |last2=Jennings |first2=Peter |last3=Nissen |first3=Beth |date=November 22, 1994 |title=The Bell Curve and the Pioneer Fund |url=http://www.ferris.edu/isar/tanton/abcnews.htm |work=ABC World News Tonight |publisher=ABC News |access-date=May 1, 2020 |archive-date=March 3, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303213542/http://www.ferris.edu/isar/tanton/abcnews.htm |url-status=live }} Vanderbilt Television News Archive : {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160103223437/http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=151406 |date=January 3, 2016 }}</ref> According to ], "The University of California's Arthur Jensen, cited twenty-three times in ''The Bell Curve''{{'}}s bibliography, is the book's principal authority on the intellectual inferiority of blacks."<ref>{{cite book |last=Montagu |first=Ashley |title=Race and IQ |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |year=2002 |edition=2 |isbn=978-0-19-510221-5}}</ref>
See the articles ], ], and ] for further discussion of the validity of these tests.


The ] lists the Pioneer Fund as a ], citing the fund's history, its funding of race and intelligence research, and its connections with ] individuals.{{sfn|Berlet|2003}} Other researchers have criticized the Pioneer Fund for promoting ], ] and ].{{sfn|Tucker|2002}}<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110525150639/http://www.pioneerfund.org/Board.html |date=2011-05-25 }}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Falk|2008|p=18}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Wroe|2008|p=81}}</ref>
===The contemporary debate: results and interpretations===
The contemporary scholarly debate about race and intelligence involves both the relatively uncontroversial experimental '''results''' that indicate that average IQ test scores vary among racial groups, and the relatively more controversial '''interpretations''' of these IQ differences. In general, contemporary interpretations of the "IQ gap" can be divided into three broad categories:


== Conceptual issues ==
# '''"culture-only"''' or '''"environment-only"''' interpretations that posit overwhelmingly non-genetic causes (for example, ] or ] group membership) that differentially affect racial groups; and
# '''"partly genetic"''' interpretations that posit an IQ gap between racial groups caused by approximately the same matrix of genetic and environmental forces that cause IQ differences among individuals of the same race.
# '''"insufficient data"''': no meaningful interpretation can be made based on available evidence.


=== History === === Intelligence and IQ ===
{{Main|Human intelligence|Intelligence quotient|G factor (psychometrics)}}
] wrote on ] and ] in the 19th C.]]
The concept of intelligence and the degree to which intelligence is measurable are matters of debate. There is no consensus about how to define intelligence; nor is it universally accepted that it is something that can be meaningfully measured by a single figure.<ref name="Schacter, Gilbert & Wegner 2007, pp 350-1">{{harvnb|Schacter|Gilbert|Wegner|2007|pp=350–1}}</ref> A recurring criticism is that different societies value and promote different kinds of skills and that the concept of intelligence is therefore culturally variable and cannot be measured by the same criteria in different societies.<ref name="Schacter, Gilbert & Wegner 2007, pp 350-1"/> Consequently, some critics argue that it makes no sense to propose relationships between intelligence and other variables.<ref name="Sternberg, Grigorenko & Kidd 2005">{{harvnb|Sternberg|Grigorenko|Kidd|2005}}</ref>
====1850s to World War II====
The scientific debate on the contribution of ] to individual and group differences in intelligence can be traced to at least the mid-19th century<ref>{{AYref|Degler|1992}}; {{AYref|Loehlin et al.|1975}}</ref>. ] wrote in his '']'' (VII, ''On the races of Man''):
"he various races, when carefully compared and measured, differ much from each other—as in the texture of hair, the relative proportions of all parts of the body, the capacity of the lungs, the form and capacity of the skull, and even the convolutions of the brain. But it would be an endless task to specify the numerous points of difference. The races differ also in constitution, in acclimatization and in liability to certain diseases. Their mental characteristics are likewise very distinct; chiefly as it would appear in their emotional, but partly in their intellectual faculties."


Correlations between scores on various types of IQ tests led English psychologist ] to propose in 1904 the existence of an underlying factor, which he referred to as "''g''" or "]", a trait which is supposed to be innate.<ref name="deary2008">{{Cite journal |last1=Deary |first1=I. J. |last2=Lawn |first2=M. |last3=Bartholomew |first3=D. J. |year=2008 |title="A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931-1938": Correction to Deary, Lawn, and Bartholomew (2008) |url=https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/8897614/a_conversation_between_charles_spareman.pdf |journal=History of Psychology |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=156–157 |doi=10.1037/1093-4510.11.3.163 |hdl=20.500.11820/5417f3c7-e873-40b9-ad73-19c6acc9e35b |access-date=2020-06-25 |archive-date=2020-08-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806163233/https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/8897614/a_conversation_between_charles_spareman.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Another proponent of this view is ].{{sfn|Jensen|1998||page=}} This view, however, has been contradicted by a number of studies showing that education and changes in environment can significantly improve IQ test results.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ceci |first=Stephen J. |date=1991 |title=How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence |journal=Developmental Psychology |volume=27 |issue=5 |pages=703–722 |doi=10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.703}}</ref>{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2006}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Richie |first1=Stuart J. |last2=Tucker-Drob |first2=Elliot |date=June 2018 |title=How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325832102 |journal=Psychological Science |volume=29 |issue=8}}</ref>
] ] was a prominent 20th C. critic of claims that intelligence differed among races.]]


Other psychometricians have argued that, whether or not there is such a thing as a general intelligence factor, performance on tests relies crucially on knowledge acquired through prior exposure to the types of tasks that such tests contain. This means that comparisons of test scores between persons with widely different life experiences and cognitive habits do not reveal their relative innate potentials.{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011|p=359}}
The writings of Sir ], elaborating on the work of his cousin Darwin, spurred interest in the study of mental abilities, particularly as they relate to ] and ].


=== Race ===
The fact that there are differences in the brain sizes and brain structures of different racial and ethnic groups was well known and widely studied during the ] and early ].<ref>{{AYref|Broca|1873}}, {{AYref|Bean|1906}}, {{AYref|Mall|1909}}, {{AYref|Morton|1839}}, {{AYref|Pearl|1934}}, {{AYref|Vint|1934}}</ref> Average ethnic and racial group differences in IQ were first found due to the widespread use of standardized mental tests during ].
{{Main|Race (human categorization)|Race and genetics}}
The consensus view among geneticists, biologists and anthropologists is that race is a sociopolitical phenomenon rather than a biological one,<ref name="NASEM-2023">{{Cite book |url=https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/26902/chapter/1 |title=Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field (Consensus Study Report) |date=2023 |publisher=] |doi=10.17226/26902 |pmid=36989389 |isbn=978-0-309-70065-8 |quote=In humans, race is a socially constructed designation, a misleading and harmful surrogate for population genetic differences, and has a long history of being incorrectly identified as the major genetic reason for phenotypic differences between groups.}}</ref>{{sfn|Daley|Onwuegbuzie|2011|p=294}}<ref name="Templeton2016">Templeton, A. (2016). EVOLUTION AND NOTIONS OF HUMAN RACE. In Losos J. & Lenski R. (Eds.), ''How Evolution Shapes Our Lives: Essays on Biology and Society'' (pp. 346–361). Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. {{doi|10.2307/j.ctv7h0s6j.26}}. That this view reflects the consensus among American anthropologists is stated in: {{cite journal |last1=Wagner |first1=Jennifer K. |last2=Yu |first2=Joon-Ho |last3=Ifekwunigwe |first3=Jayne O. |last4=Harrell |first4=Tanya M. |last5=Bamshad |first5=Michael J. |last6=Royal |first6=Charmaine D. |date=February 2017 |title=Anthropologists' views on race, ancestry, and genetics |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |volume=162 |issue=2 |pages=318–327 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.23120 |pmc=5299519 |pmid=27874171}} See also: {{cite web |author=] |date=27 March 2019 |title=AAPA Statement on Race and Racism |url=https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/ |access-date=19 June 2020 |website=American Association of Physical Anthropologists |archive-date=25 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125163036/https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/ |url-status=live }}</ref> a view supported by considerable genetics research.{{sfn|Smay|Armelagos|2000}}<ref>{{Cite journal |journal=Nature Genetics |date=2004 |volume=36 |issue=11 Suppl |pages=43–47 |author1=Rotimi, Charles N. |title=Are medical and nonmedical uses of large-scale genomic markers conflating genetics and 'race'? |doi=10.1038/ng1439 |quote="Two facts are relevant: (i) as a result of different evolutionary forces, including natural selection, there are geographical patterns of genetic variations that correspond, for the most part, to continental origin; and (ii) observed patterns of geographical differences in genetic information do not correspond to our notion of social identities, including 'race' and 'ethnicity" |pmid=15508002 |doi-access=free}}</ref> The current mainstream view is that race is a social construction based on folk ideologies that construct groups based on social disparities and superficial physical characteristics.<ref>{{harvnb|Schaefer|2008}}</ref> A 2023 consensus report from the ] stated: "In humans, race is a socially constructed designation, a misleading and harmful surrogate for population genetic differences, and has a long history of being incorrectly identified as the major genetic reason for phenotypic differences between groups."<ref name="NASEM-2023" />


The concept of human "races" as natural and separate divisions within the human species has also been rejected by the ]. The official position of the AAA, adopted in 1998, is that advances in scientific knowledge have made it "clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups" and that "any attempt to establish lines of division among biological populations both arbitrary and subjective."<ref name="AAA">{{harvnb|AAA|1998}}</ref> A more recent statement from the ] (2019) declares that "Race does not provide an accurate representation of human biological variation. It was never accurate in the past, and it remains inaccurate when referencing contemporary human populations. Humans are not divided biologically into distinct continental types or racial genetic clusters."<ref>{{Cite web |title=AAPA Statement on Race & Racism |url=https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/ |access-date=2020-06-28 |archive-date=2022-01-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125163036/https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Beginning in the ], ] — the belief that ] contribute to differences in intelligence among humans — began to fall out of favor, in part due to the advocacy of ], who in his 1938 edition of ''The Mind of Primitive Man'' wrote, "there is nothing at all that could be interpreted as suggesting any material difference in the mental capacity of the bulk of the Negro population as compared with the bulk of the White population."<ref>{{AYref|Boas|1938}}</ref> The hereditarian position was greatly weakened by Boas' finding that cranial vault size had increased significantly in the U.S. from one generation to the next, because racial differences in such characteristics had been among the strongest arguments for a genetic role. Inspired by the American eugenics movement, ] implemented the ] in which roughly 200,000 mentally and physically disabled Germans were killed, and about 400,000 sterilized.


Anthropologists such as ],<ref name="Brace 2005">{{harvnb|Brace|2005}}</ref> the philosophers Jonathan Kaplan and Rasmus Winther,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kaplan |first1=Jonathan Michael |last2=Winther |first2=Rasmus Grønfeldt |date=2014 |title=Realism, Antirealism, and Conventionalism About Race |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/KAPRAA |journal=] |volume=81 |issue=5 |pages=1039–1052 |doi=10.1086/678314 |s2cid=55148854}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Winther |first=Rasmus Grønfeldt |date=2015 |title=The Genetic Reification of 'Race'?: A Story of Two Mathematical Methods |url=http://philpapers.org/archive/WINTGR.pdf |journal=] |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=204–223}}</ref>{{sfnp|Kaplan|Winther|2013}} and the geneticist ],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Graves |first=Joseph |date=7 June 2006 |title=What We Know and What We Don't Know: Human Genetic Variation and the Social Construction of Race |url=http://raceandgenomics.ssrc.org/Graves/ |website=Race and Genomics |access-date=3 December 2023 |archive-date=3 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603030227/http://raceandgenomics.ssrc.org/Graves/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> have argued that the cluster structure of genetic data is dependent on the initial hypotheses of the researcher and the influence of these hypotheses on the choice of populations to sample. When one samples continental groups, the clusters become continental, but if one had chosen other sampling patterns, the clustering would be different. Weiss and Fullerton have noted that if one sampled only Icelanders, Mayans and Maoris, three distinct clusters would form and all other populations could be described as being clinally composed of admixtures of Maori, Icelandic and Mayan genetic materials.<ref name="evolutionary">{{cite journal |last1=Weiss |first1=K. M. |last2=Fullerton |first2=S. M. |date=2005 |title=Racing around, getting nowhere |journal=Evolutionary Anthropology |volume=14 |issue=5 |pages=165–169 |doi=10.1002/evan.20079 |s2cid=84927946}}</ref> Kaplan and Winther conclude that while racial groups are characterized by different allele frequencies, this does not mean that racial classification is a natural taxonomy of the human species, because multiple other genetic patterns can be found in human populations that crosscut racial distinctions. Moreover, the genomic data underdetermines whether one ]. Under Kaplan and Winther's view, racial groupings are objective social constructions (see Mills 1998<ref>{{cite book |last=Mills |first=C. W. |title=Blackness visible: essays on philosophy and race |date=1988 |publisher=] |location=Ithaca, New York |pages=41–66 |chapter=But What Are You Really? The Metaphysics of Race |author-link=C. Wright Mills}}</ref>) that have conventional biological reality only insofar as the categories are chosen and constructed for pragmatic scientific reasons. {{harvp|Sternberg|Grigorenko|Kidd|2005}} argue that the social construction of race derives not from any valid scientific basis but rather "from people's desire to classify."<ref name="Sternberg, Grigorenko & Kidd 2005" />
====Post WWII and modern times====
Due in part to the association of hereditarianism with ], after the conclusion of ] until the 1994 publication of '']'', it became largely taboo to suggest that there were racial or ethnic differences in measures of intellectual or academic ability and even more taboo to suggest that they might involve a genetic component<ref>{{AYref|Garrett|1961}}; {{AYref|Lynn|2001}}, pp. 45–54</ref>.


In studies of human intelligence, race is almost always determined using self-reports rather than analyses of genetic characteristics. According to psychologist David Rowe, self-report is the preferred method for racial classification in studies of racial differences because classification based on genetic markers alone ignore the "cultural, behavioral, sociological, psychological, and epidemiological variables" that distinguish racial groups.<ref name="Rowe 2005">{{harvnb|Rowe|2005}}</ref> Hunt and Carlson disagreed, writing that "Nevertheless, self-identification is a surprisingly reliable guide to genetic composition," citing a study by {{harvp|Tang et al.|2005}}.<ref name="Hunt & Carlson 2007">{{harvnb|Hunt|Carlson|2007}}</ref> Sternberg and Grigorenko disputed Hunt and Carlson's interpretation of Tang's results as supporting the view that racial divisions are biological; rather, "Tang et al.'s point was that ancient geographic ancestry rather than current residence is associated with self-identification and not that such self-identification provides evidence for the existence of biological race."<ref>{{harvnb|Sternberg|Grigorenko|2007}}</ref>
] (pictured) and ] started the contemporary debate with '']'' in ].]]


== Group differences ==
In 1961, the psychologist ] coined the term ''equalitarian dogma'' to describe the then politically fashionable view that there were no race differences in intelligence, or if there were, they were purely the result of environmental factors. Those who questioned these views often put their careers at risk<ref>{{AYref|Lynn|2001}} pp. 67–69</ref>.
The study of human intelligence is one of the most controversial topics in psychology, in part because of difficulty reaching agreement about the meaning of ''intelligence'' and objections to the assumption that intelligence can be meaningfully measured by IQ tests. Claims that there are innate differences in intelligence between racial and ethnic groups—which go back at least to the 19th century—have been criticized for relying on specious assumptions and research methods and for serving as an ideological framework for discrimination and racism.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}}{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|p=222}}


In a 2012 study of tests of different components of intelligence, Hampshire et al. expressed disagreement with the view of Jensen and Rushton that genetic factors must play a role in IQ differences between races, stating that "it remains unclear ... whether population differences in intelligence test scores are driven by heritable factors or by other correlated demographic variables such as socioeconomic status, education level, and motivation. More relevantly, it is questionable whether relate to a unitary intelligence factor, as opposed to a bias in testing paradigms toward particular components of a more complex intelligence construct."<ref name=":1">{{Harvnb|Hampshire|Highfield|Parkin|Owen|2012}}.</ref> According to Jackson and Weidman,
]'', updated in ], ] criticized many aspects of IQ research.]]
{{blockquote|There are a number of reasons why the genetic argument for race differences in intelligence has not won many adherents in the scientific community. First, even taken on its own terms, the case made by Jensen and his followers did not hold up to scrutiny. Second, the rise of population genetics undercut the claims for a genetic cause of intelligence. Third, the new understanding of ] offered a better explanation for the existence of differences in IQ scores between the races.{{sfn|Jackson|Weidman|2004|p=222}}}}


=== Test scores ===
The contemporary scholarly debate on race and intelligence may be traced to ]'s ] publication in the ''Harvard Educational Review'' of "How Much Can We Boost IQ and School Achievement?"<ref>{{AYref|Jensen|1969}}</ref> In this paper, he wrote on some of the major issues that characterize the partly genetic hypothesis of racial IQ differences, and on compensatory educational programs. Reports on Jensen's article appeared in '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''.
{{main|Achievement gap in the United States}}
In the United States, Asians on average score higher than White people, who tend to score higher than Hispanics, who tend to score higher than African Americans.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} Much greater variation in IQ scores exists within each ethnic group than between them.{{Clarify|reason=The prose here should be clarified. Is it saying that the recorded IQ range within each race is greater than any differences of averages between races?|date=December 2023}}<ref name="Reynolds-2021">{{Cite book |last1=Reynolds |first1=Cecil R. |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-59455-8_15 |title=Mastering Modern Psychological Testing |last2=Altmann |first2=Robert A. |last3=Allen |first3=Daniel N. |publisher=Springer |year=2021 |pages=573–613, 582 |chapter=The Problem of Bias in Psychological Assessment|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-59455-8_15 |isbn=978-3-030-59454-1 |s2cid=236660997 }}</ref><ref name=SAGE>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yDDqLBBk7BcC |title=Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education |date=2012 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-8152-1 |page=1209 |language=en |access-date=2018-01-20 |archive-date=2023-03-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230320043631/https://books.google.com/books?id=yDDqLBBk7BcC |url-status=live }}</ref> A 2001 ] of the results of 6,246,729 participants tested for cognitive ability or aptitude found a difference in average scores between black people and white people of 1.1 ]. Consistent results were found for college and university application tests such as the ] (N = 2.4 million) and ] (N = 2.3 million), as well as for tests of job applicants in corporate settings (N = 0.5 million) and in the military (N = 0.4 million).<ref name="Roth et al. 2001">{{harvnb|Roth et al.|2001}}</ref>


In response to the controversial 1994 book '']'', the ] (APA) formed a task-force of eleven experts, which issued a report "]" in 1996.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} Regarding group differences, the report reaffirmed the consensus that differences within groups are much wider than differences between groups, and that claims of ethnic differences in intelligence should be scrutinized carefully, as such claims had been used to justify racial discrimination. The report also acknowledged problems with the racial categories used, as these categories are neither consistently applied, nor homogeneous {{xref|(see ])}}.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}}
Press attention returned to the issue of race and intelligence in ] with the publication of '']'', which included two chapters on the subject of racial difference in intelligence and related life outcomes. In response to ''The Bell Curve'', ] updated '']'' in ].<ref>{{AYref|Gould|1996}}</ref> Among other things, he criticized the IQ test as a measure of intelligence, citing what he perceived as inherent racial and social biases as well as systematic flaws in the testing process.


In the UK, some African groups have higher average educational attainment and standardized test scores than the overall population.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Feyisa |last1=Demie |first2=Christabel |last2=McLean |title=Raising the achievement of African heritage pupils: a case study of good practice in British schools |journal=Educational Studies |date=1 December 2007 |issn=0305-5698 |pages=415–434 |volume=33 |issue=4 |doi=10.1080/03055690701423606 |s2cid=144579288}}</ref> In 2010–2011, white British pupils were 2.3% less likely to have gained 5 A*–C grades at ] than the national average, whereas the likelihood was 21.8% above average for those of ] origin, 5.5% above average for those of ] origin, and 1.4% above average for those of ] origin. For the two other African ethnic groups on which data was available, the likelihood was 23.7% below average for those of ] origin and 35.3% below average for those of ] origin.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rutter |first=Jill |title=Back to basics: Towards a successful and cost-effective integration policy |work=IPPR |publisher=Institute for Public Policy Research |year=2013 |url=https://www.ippr.org/publications/back-to-basics-towards-a-successful-and-cost-effective-integration-policy |page=43 |access-date=2020-05-23 |archive-date=2020-04-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413214928/https://www.ippr.org/publications/back-to-basics-towards-a-successful-and-cost-effective-integration-policy |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2014, Black-African pupils of 11 language groups were more likely to pass ] Maths 4+ in England than the national average. Overall, the average pass rate by ethnicity was 86.5% for white British (N = 395,787), whereas it was 85.6% for Black-Africans (N = 18,497). Nevertheless, several Black-African language groups, including ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] speakers, and English-speaking Africans, each had an average pass rate above the white British average (total N = 9,314), with the Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba, and Amhara having averages above 90% (N = 2,071).<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Feyisa Demie |first=Andrew Hau |title=Language Diversity and Attainment in Primary Schools in England |publisher=Lambeth Research And Statistics Unit |year=2016 |url=https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/rsu/sites/www.lambeth.gov.uk.rsu/files/language_diversity_and_attainment_in_primary_schools_in_england_2017.pdf |page=18 |access-date=2020-05-24 |archive-date=2020-08-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806165229/https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/rsu/sites/www.lambeth.gov.uk.rsu/files/language_diversity_and_attainment_in_primary_schools_in_england_2017.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2017–2018, the percentage of pupils getting a strong pass (grade 5 or above) in the English and maths GCSE (in ]) was 42.7% for whites (N = 396,680) and 44.3% for Black-Africans (N = 18,358).<ref>{{Cite web |title=GCSE English and maths results |url=https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/education-skills-and-training/11-to-16-years-old/a-to-c-in-english-and-maths-gcse-attainment-for-children-aged-14-to-16-key-stage-4/3.0 |date=2019 |website=Gov.UK |access-date=2022-09-20 |archive-date=2022-09-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920173733/https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/education-skills-and-training/11-to-16-years-old/a-to-c-in-english-and-maths-gcse-attainment-for-children-aged-14-to-16-key-stage-4/3.0 |url-status=live }}</ref>
The introduction of ] tailored to the genetics and disease patterns of specific racial groups is currently one of the factors adding to the complexity and controversy of debates on race and science<ref>{{AYref|Kohn|2006}}</ref>. In ], the scholarly debate continues on the question of "whether the cause of group differences in average IQ is purely social, economic, and cultural or whether genetic factors are also involved"<ref>{{AYref|Rushton and Jensen|2005a}}</ref>.


=== Flynn effect and the closing gap ===
== Public controversy ==
{{Main|Flynn effect}}
{{main|Race and intelligence (Public controversy)}}
The ']' — a term coined after researcher ] — refers to the substantial rise in raw IQ test scores observed in many parts of the world during the 20th century. In the United States, the increase was continuous and approximately linear from the earliest years of testing to about 1998 when the gains stopped and some tests even showed decreasing test scores. For example, the average scores of black people on some IQ tests in 1995 were the same as the scores of white people in 1945.<ref>{{harvnb|Mackintosh|1998|p=162}}</ref> As one pair of academics phrased it, "the typical African American today probably has a slightly higher IQ than the grandparents of today's average white American."<ref>{{cite book |last=Swain |first=Carol |title=Contemporary voices of white nationalism in America |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK New York |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-521-01693-3 |page= |url=https://archive.org/details/contemporaryvoic00swai/page/70}} Note: this quote is from the authors' introductory essay, not from the interviews.</ref>
===Media portrayal===
{{Main|Race and intelligence (Media portrayal)}}
Media portrayal of intelligence-related topics, including race and intelligence research, was found in a ] study to be misrepresentative of opinion among scholars in relevant fields, including subfields of psychology, sociology, cognitive science, education, and genetics.<ref>{{AYref|Snyderman and Rothman|1988}}. (Snyderman and Rothman do not work in race and intelligence.)</ref> Among these scholars, 53% thought that the Black-White gap was partially genetic and 17% thought it was entirely environmental, but media reports were found to misrepresent the majority view and portray scholars in the minority as representative of mainstream opinion in their fields.<ref>The proportion of experts supporting these hypotheses today is unknown. Prominent critic ] defended the minority view as such in 1995, stating "science isn't done by majority rule." Critic ] states in 1992 "Although we may believe that we live in an enlightened age, most of my colleagues believe indeed that there are substantial genetic components to the lower IQ scores that are on average earned by African-Americans and by Hispanics compared to whites and Asians. And that has been substantiated by surveys of them and of the leading experts in the field" ({{AYref|Mathews|1992}}).</ref>(See below: ].)


Flynn himself argued that the dramatic changes having taken place between one just generation and the next pointed strongly at an environmental explanation, and that it is highly unlikely that genetic factors could have accounted for the increasing scores. The Flynn effect, along with Flynn's analysis, continues to hold significance in the context of the black/white IQ gap debate, demonstrating the potential for environmental factors to influence IQ test scores by as much as 1 standard deviation, a scale of change that had previously been doubted.{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2001}}
A ] study found widespread and systematic research misinterpretation regarding one of the more popular explanations for the IQ gap.<ref>{{AYref|Sackett et al.|2004}}: "One is that misinterpretation of research is regrettably all too common and thus that documenting misinterpretations in one single domain is of limited interest. Our response is that we are singling out this domain because the issue at stake is of such importance and because the interpretive errors are so rampant and so systematic" (p. 11).</ref> Introducing ''stereotype threat'' to a test-taking environment has been shown to increase the existing gap between Blacks or Whites in relation to Whites or Asians respectively, and has thus been offered as a potential contributor to the gap.<ref>Other researchers have extended these results to other groups (e.g., gender, age) (p. 11).</ref> However, 88% of accounts in the popular media, 91% in scientific journals, and 67% in psychology textbooks misinterpreted the findings as that eliminating the introduced stereotype threat eliminated the Black-White gap, when in fact the students had already been matched according to prior scores.<ref>pp. 10-11.</ref> The authors suggest the appeal of the misinterpreted findings may have been a factor, and that such research results in general may in this way be systemically more readily accepted.<ref>"We can only speculate as to causes of the mischaracterization of the Steele and Aronson (1995) findings in these various media. . . A factor contributing to not noticing the adjustment may be the appeal of the misinterpreted findings (i.e., the conclusion that eliminating stereotype threat eliminates African American–White differences). Finding mechanisms to reduce or eliminate subgroup differences is an outcome that we believe would be virtually universally welcomed. Thus, research findings that can be interpreted as contributing to that outcome may be more readily accepted with less critical scrutiny" (p. 11).</ref>


A distinct but related observation has been the gradual narrowing of the American black-white IQ gap in the last decades of the 20th century, as black test-takers increased their average scores relative to white test-takers. For instance, Vincent reported in 1991 that the black–white IQ gap was decreasing among children, but that it was remaining constant among adults.{{sfn|Vincent|1991}} Similarly, a 2006 study by Dickens and Flynn estimated that the difference between mean scores of black people and white people closed by about 5 or 6 IQ points between 1972 and 2002,{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2006}} a reduction of about one-third. In the same period, the educational achievement disparity also diminished.<ref>Neisser, Ulric (Ed). 1998. The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association</ref> Reviews by Flynn and Dickens,{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2006}} Mackintosh,{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011}} and Nisbett ''et al.'' accept the gradual closing of the gap as a fact.{{sfn|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a}} Flynn and Dickens summarize this trend, stating, "The constancy of the Black-White IQ gap is a myth and therefore cannot be cited as evidence that the racial IQ gap is genetic in origin."{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2006}}
===Utility of research and racism===
{{Main|Race and intelligence (Utility of research)}}
One criticism of race and intelligence research, regardless of whether racial differences are genetic or not, questions its ]. It's been argued that society might actually be better off "with an untruth: that there is no good reason for this inequality, and therefore society is at fault and we must try harder."<ref>{{AYref|Glazer|1994}}. The position that knowledge of ''what is'' is dependent on statements of ''what is good'' has been criticized by microbiologist ] as the "moralistic fallacy," an implied converse of the ]({{AYref|Davis|1978}}). The latter refers to an effort to derive an ''ought'' directly from an ''is'' (for example, war is good because it's part of human nature) and the former refers to an effort to derive an ''is'' from an ''ought'' (for example, war is not part of human nature because it's bad).</ref>


==Environmental factors==
The ] has stated: "Race science has potentially frightening consequences, as is evident not only from the horrors of Nazi Germany, but also from the troubled racial history of the United States. If white supremacist groups had their way, the United States would return to its dark days. In publication after publication, hate groups are using this "science" to legitimize racial hatred."
===Health and nutrition===
{{Main|Impact of health on intelligence}}
]


Environmental factors including ],<ref name="Bellinger, Stiles & Needleman 1992"/> low rates of ],<ref name="Campbell et al. 2002">{{harvnb|Campbell et al.|2002}}</ref> and poor ]<ref>{{harvnb|Ivanovic et al.|2004}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Saloojee| Pettifor|2001}}</ref> are significantly correlated with poor cognitive development and functioning. For example, childhood exposure to {{nowrap|lead{{tsp}}{{mdash}}{{tsp}}}}associated with homes in poorer {{nowrap|areas<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/ped_env_health/docs/ped_env_health.pdf |title=Principles of Pediatric Environmental Health, The Child as Susceptible Host: A Developmental Approach to Pediatric Environmental Medicine |last=Agency For Toxic Substances And Disease Registry Case Studies In Environmental Medicine (CSEM) |date=2012-02-15 |website=U.S. Department for Health and Human Services |access-date=2019-01-30 |archive-date=2019-01-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190131093309/https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/ped_env_health/docs/ped_env_health.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>{{hsp}}{{mdash}}{{tsp}}}}correlates with an average IQ drop of 7 points,<ref name="Lanphear Hornung Khoury Yolton 2005 pp. 894–899">{{cite journal |last1=Lanphear |first1=Bruce P. |last2=Hornung |first2=Richard |last3=Khoury |first3=Jane |last4=Yolton |first4=Kimberly |last5=Baghurst |first5=Peter |last6=Bellinger |first6=David C. |last7=Canfield |first7=Richard L. |last8=Dietrich |first8=Kim N. |last9=Bornschein |first9=Robert |last10=Greene |first10=Tom |last11=Rothenberg |first11=Stephen J. |last12=Needleman |first12=Herbert L. |last13=Schnaas |first13=Lourdes |last14=Wasserman |first14=Gail |last15=Graziano |first15=Joseph |last16=Roberts |first16=Russell |title=Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Children's Intellectual Function: An International Pooled Analysis |journal=Environmental Health Perspectives |volume=113 |issue=7 |date=2005-03-18 |issn=0091-6765 |pmid=16002379 |pmc=1257652 |doi=10.1289/ehp.7688 |pages=894–899|bibcode=2005EnvHP.113..894L }}</ref> and ], on average, of 12 IQ points.<ref>{{harvnb|Qian et al.|2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=James |last1=Feyrer |first2=Dimitra |last2=Politi |first3=David N. |last3=Weil |title=The Cognitive Effects of Micronutrient Deficiency: Evidence from Salt Iodization in the United States |year=2017 |journal=Journal of the European Economic Association |volume=15 |issue=2 |pages=355–387 |doi=10.1093/jeea/jvw002 |pmid=31853231 |pmc=6919660 |url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w19233.pdf |access-date=2019-07-22 |archive-date=2020-08-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200813174601/https://www.nber.org/papers/w19233.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Such impairments may sometimes be permanent, but in some cases they be partially or wholly compensated for by later growth.
Some scientists, including ],
<ref>"...Might it be fair also to say that the champions of 'no difference' in race or sex, or intelligence ... are the guardians of a greater 'untruth' that allows people to live together in mutual harmony, implying that these critics really deserve to be praised as our protectors even when they are factually wrong? ... I think also it is roughly how the self-appointed guardians choose to present themselves - leaving aside, usually, the step of frankly admitting that they are promoting factual untruths when they know that they are." While these scientists may, he argues, be driven by personal social or political concerns, "it is harder for me to caste a man like ], taking an example from the other side, in a similar light. ... Rushton has to be admitted to be promoting a segment of the pan-human chromosome that is very distantly situated from his own locus, Ontario, supporting a locus situated at the far end of Asia." Hamilton concludes: "Any human science not aiming for factual truth in human social matters is as inevitably doomed to bring costly accidents in the long run as would be an unfactual science of technology" ({{AYref|Hamilton & Dawkins|2002}}, )</ref> considered one of the greatest evolutionary theorists of the 20th century,<ref></ref>
The first two years of life are critical for malnutrition, the consequences of which are often irreversible and include poor cognitive development, educability, and future economic productivity.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717005704/http://www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-and-child-undernutrition |date=2011-07-17 }}, 2008.</ref><!--Which paper? Link points only to to listed series of papers (yes, need more specific, preferably secondary, reference) --> Mackintosh points out that, for American black people, infant mortality is about twice as high as for white people, and low birth weight is twice as prevalent. At the same time, white mothers are twice as likely to breastfeed their infants, and breastfeeding is directly correlated with IQ for low-birth-weight infants. In this way, a wide number of health-related factors which influence IQ are unequally distributed between the two groups.{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011|pages=343–44}}
argue that suppressing race and intelligence research is actually more harmful than dealing with it honestly. ] argues:
<blockquote>Lying about race differences in achievement is harmful because it foments mutual recrimination. Because the untruth insists that differences cannot be natural, they must be artificial, manmade, manufactured. Someone must be at fault. Someone must be refusing to do the right thing. It therefore sustains unwarranted, divisive, and ever-escalating mutual accusations of moral culpability, such as Whites are racist and Blacks are lazy.<ref>{{AYref|Gottfredson|2005b}}</ref></blockquote>


The ] in 2004 stated that lack of both iodine and iron has been implicated in impaired brain development, and this can affect enormous numbers of people: it is estimated that one-third of the total global population is affected by ]. In developing countries, it is estimated that 40% of children aged four and under have ] because of insufficient iron in their diets.<ref>{{harvnb|Behrman|Alderman|Hoddinott|2004}}</ref>
] argues that opposition to racism is based on ], not scientific assumptions, and is not vulnerable to being disproved by bioscientific advances. "The case against bigotry is not a factual claim that humans are biologically indistinguishable. It is a moral stance that condemns judging an individual according to the average traits of certain groups..."<ref>'']'' p. 145</ref>. Pinker suggests that intellectual life may not at present be prepared to deal with this area of inquiry<ref>{{AYref|Pinker|2005}}</ref>.


Other scholars have found that simply the standard of nutrition has a significant effect on population intelligence, and that the Flynn effect may be caused by increasing nutrition standards across the world.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Colom |first1=R. |last2=Lluis-Font |first2=J. M. |last3=Andrés-Pueyo |first3=A. |year=2005 |title=The generational intelligence gains are caused by decreasing variance in the lower half of the distribution: supporting evidence for the nutrition hypothesis |journal=Intelligence |volume=33 |pages=83–91 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2004.07.010}}</ref> James Flynn has himself argued against this view.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Flynn |first1=J. R. |year=2009a |title=Requiem for nutrition as the cause of IQ gains: Raven's gains in Britain 1938 to 2008 |journal=Economics and Human Biology |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=18–27 |doi=10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.009 |pmid=19251490}}</ref>
Coming advances in ] and ] are expected to soon provide the ability to test hypotheses about group differences rigorously, whether between races, sexes, or other groups, in cognitive traits or temperament, musical or athletic talent, or in responses to biomedical treatments. Some scientists predict this will be the source of one of the biggest social and intellectual issues of the coming decades.<ref> {{AYref|Pinker|2006}} predicts "the dangerous idea of the next decade that groups of people may differ genetically in their average talents and temperaments . . . Perhaps geneticists will forbear performing these tests, but one shouldn't count on it. The tests could very well emerge as by-products of research in biomedicine, genealogy, and deep history which no one wants to stop." {{AYref|Stock|2002}} argues "We will have to consider how much our genes shape personality, intelligence, athletic talent, musical ability, memory, temperament, sexual orientation such sensitive issues will not remain in limbo much longer . . . The answers will be just another byproduct of to find useful correlations between our genes and key aspects of who we are. How we respond to this new information will be one of the biggest social and intellectual challenges of the coming decades, for we will learn a great deal about ourselves that many people would rather not face" (pp. 44-47, also p. 105). {{AYref|Murray|2005}} discusses the issue of group differences also in the context of age groups and sexual orientation groups.</ref>


Some recent research has argued that the retardation caused in brain development by ]s, many of which are more prevalent in non-white populations, may be an important factor in explaining the differences in IQ between different regions of the world. The findings of this research, showing the correlation between IQ, race and infectious diseases was also shown to apply to the IQ gap in the US, suggesting that this may be an important environmental factor.<ref name="Eppig 2011">{{harvnb|Eppig|2011}}</ref>
===Accusations of bias===
{{main|Race and intelligence (Accusations of bias)}}


A 2013 meta-analysis by the World Health Organization found that, after controlling for maternal IQ, breastfeeding was associated with IQ gains of 2.19 points. The authors suggest that this relationship is causal but state that the practical significance of this gain is debatable; however, they highlight one study suggesting an association between breastfeeding and academic performance in Brazil, where "breastfeeding duration does not present marked variability by socioeconomic position."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Long-term effects of breastfeeding – a systemic review |first1=Bernardo L. |last1=Horta |first2=Cesar G. |last2=Victoria |publisher=World Health Organization |year=2013 |access-date=18 June 2018 |url=http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/79198/9789241505307_eng.pdf |archive-date=9 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200409233115/https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/79198/9789241505307_eng.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Colen and Ramey (2014) similarly find that controlling for sibling comparisons within families, rather than between families, reduces the correlation between breastfeeding status and WISC IQ scores by nearly a third, but further find the relationship between breastfeeding duration and WISC IQ scores to be insignificant. They suggest that "much of the beneficial long-term effects typically attributed to breastfeeding, per se, may primarily be due to selection pressures into infant feeding practices along key demographic characteristics such as race and socioeconomic status."<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Cynthia G. |last1=Colen |first2=David M. |last2=Ramey |journal=Social Science & Medicine |volume=109 |issue=1 |pages=55–65 |year=2014 |pmc=4077166 |title=Is Breast Truly Best? Estimating the Effect of Breastfeeding on Long-term Child Wellbeing in the United States Using Sibling Comparisons |doi=10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.027 |pmid=24698713}}</ref> Reichman estimates that no more than 3 to 4% of the black–white IQ gap can be explained by black–white disparities in low birth weight.<ref>{{harvnb|Reichman|2005}}</ref>
The largest source of funding for proponents of the partly genetic interpretation, the ], has been criticized by some critics as having a ] and ] political agenda, and has been characterized by the controversial ] as a "]," using the definition "attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics".<ref> http://www.tolerance.org/maps/hate/index.html.</ref> Other critics regard the fund as having had an ultimately positive effect.<ref> ], who was the chairman of the APA's ] on intelligence research, gave support for ]'s argument in Lynn's ''The Science of Human Diversity: A History of the Pioneer Fund'' (2001). Neisser states in his book review ({{AYref|Neisser|2004}}) that, though race and intelligence research "turns stomach . . . Lynn's claim is exaggerated but not entirely without merit: 'Over those 60 years, the research funded by Pioneer has helped change the face of social science.'" Neisser concludes in agreement with Lynn and against ]'s critical book on the Pioneer Fund ({{AYref|Tucker|2002}}), also reviewed, that the world is ultimately better off having had the Pioneer Fund: "Lynn reminds us that Pioneer has sometimes sponsored useful research - research that otherwise might not have been done at all. By that reckoning, I would give it a weak plus." </ref> Some critics have found it significant that some of the prominent researchers advancing genetic explanations have also opposed affirmative action and school integration.<ref>{{AYref|Tucker|2002}}</ref>


===Education===
] argues a fear of the implications of the science of human nature ("mind, brain, genes, and evolution") has led to the perception that these are dangerous ideas<ref>{{AYref|Pinker|2006}}</ref>. Pinker argues this has resulted in a denial of human nature in which "large swaths of the intellectual landscape have been reengineered to try to rule hypotheses out ] (race does not exist, intelligence does not exist, the mind is a blank slate inscribed by parents)." Scientists working in these areas have in the past been targets of censorship, violence, and comparisons to Nazis<ref>{{AYref|Pinker|2006}}, {{AYref|Tucker|2002}}. {{AYref|Gottfredson|2005a}} summarizes the history of harrassment and violence in this area: "For a long time Jensen received death threats, needed body guards while on his campus or others, had his home and office phones routed through the police station, received his mail only after a bomb squad examined it, was physically threatened or assaulted dozens of times by protesters disrupting his talks in the United States and abroad, regularly found messages like "Jensen Must Perish" and "Kill Jensen" scrawled across his office door, and much more. Psychologists ] and ] also had such experiences during the 1970s for defying right thinking about intelligence—Eysenck, for example, being physically assaulted by protesters during a public lecture at the London School of Economics."</ref>.
Several studies have proposed that a large part of the gap in IQ test performance can be attributed to differences in quality of education.<ref>{{harvnb|Manly et al.|2002}} and {{harvnb|Manly et al.|2004}}</ref> ] in education has been proposed as one possible cause of differences in educational quality between races.<ref>{{harvnb|Mickelson|2003}}</ref> According to a paper by Hala Elhoweris, Kagendo Mutua, Negmeldin Alsheikh and Pauline Holloway, teachers' referral decisions for students to participate in ] educational programs were influenced in part by the students' ethnicity.<ref>{{harvnb|Elhoweris et al.|2005}}</ref>


The ], an intensive early childhood education project, was also able to bring about an average IQ gain of 4.4 points at age 21 in the black children who participated in it compared to controls.<ref name="Campbell et al. 2002"/> ] agreed that the Abecedarian project demonstrated that education can have a significant effect on IQ, but also declared his view that no educational program thus far had been able to reduce the black–white IQ gap by more than a third, and that differences in education are thus unlikely to be its only cause.<ref>{{harvnb|Miele|2002|p=133}}</ref>
== Average test score gaps among races ==
{{main|Race and intelligence (Average gaps among races)}}
] IQs for Whites (mean = 101.4, SD = 14.7) were higher than those for Blacks (mean = 86.9, SD = 13.0); distributions for Hispanics (mean = 91), East Asians (mean = 106), and Ashkenazi Jews (mean = 112-115) are less precise because of overlap and small sample size. The modern debate focuses on what causes these disparities in average IQ. Based on {{AYref|Reynolds et al.|1987}}, p. 330.]]


A series of studies by ] and Cynthia Holland measured the effect of prior exposure to the kind of cognitive tasks posed in IQ tests on test performance. Assuming that the IQ gap was the result of lower exposure to tasks using the cognitive functions usually found in IQ tests among African American test takers, they prepared a group of African Americans in this type of tasks before taking an IQ test. The researchers found that there was no subsequent difference in performance between the African-Americans and white test takers.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fagan |first1=Joseph F |last2=Holland |first2=Cynthia R |year=2002 |title=Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ |journal=Intelligence |volume=30 |issue=4 |pages=361–387 |doi=10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00080-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fagan |first1=J.F. |last2=Holland |first2=C.R. |year=2007 |title=Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing |journal=Intelligence |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=319–334 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.009}}</ref> Daley and Onwuegbuzie conclude that Fagan and Holland demonstrate that "differences in knowledge between black people and white people for intelligence test items can be erased when equal opportunity is provided for exposure to the information to be tested".{{sfn|Daley|Onwuegbuzie|2011}} A similar argument is made by ] who argues that IQ differences correlate well with differences in literacy suggesting that developing literacy skills through education causes an increase in IQ test performance.<ref name="Marks, D.F. 2010">{{cite journal |last1=Marks |first1=D.F. |year=2010 |title=IQ variations across time, race, and nationality: An artifact of differences in literacy skills |journal=Psychological Reports |volume=106 |issue=3 |pages=643–664 |doi=10.2466/pr0.106.3.643-664 |pmid=20712152 |s2cid=12179547}}</ref><ref name="psychologytoday.com">{{cite magazine |last=Barry |first=Scott |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beautiful-minds/201008/the-flynn-effect-and-iq-disparities-among-races-ethnicities-and-nations- |title=The Flynn Effect and IQ Disparities Among Races, Ethnicities, and Nations: Are There Common Links? |magazine=Psychology Today |date=2010-08-23 |access-date=2014-08-22 |archive-date=2023-03-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230320043730/https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/beautiful-minds/201008/the-flynn-effect-and-iq-disparities-among-races-ethnicities-and-nations |url-status=live }}</ref>
The modern controversy surrounding intelligence and race focuses on the results of IQ studies conducted during the second half of the 20th century, mainly in the United States and some other industrialized nations. In almost every testing situation where tests were administered and evaluated correctly, a difference of approximately one ] was observed in the US between the mean IQ score of blacks and whites. Most attempted compilations of average IQ by race place ] at the top, followed by ]ns, ], ]s and ], ], ]ns, and ]<ref>For example, see {{AYref|Herrnstein and Murray|1994}}; {{AYref|Lynn|1991a}}; {{AYref|Lynn|2006}}</ref>.


A 2003 study found that two variables—] and the degree of educational attainment of children's fathers—partially explained the black–white gap in cognitive ability test scores, undermining the hereditarian view that they stemmed from immutable genetic factors.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=McKay |first1=Patrick F. |last2=Doverspike |first2=Dennis |last3=Bowen-Hilton |first3=Doreen |last4=McKay |first4=Quintonia D. |title=The Effects of Demographic Variables and Stereotype Threat on Black/White Differences in Cognitive Ability Test Performance |journal=Journal of Business and Psychology |date=2003 |volume=18 |issue=1 |pages=1–14 |doi=10.1023/A:1025062703113 |s2cid=142317051}}</ref>
Some other psychological traits, such as behavioral inhibition, have also been found to vary significantly in distribution among ethnicities<ref name="Moehler2006">See two examples in {{AYref|Moehler et al.|2006}} and {{AYref|Harpending and Cochran|2002}} ].</ref>, but group differences in tests of cognitive ability have been the subject of more attention, as they are seen by some as one of society's most pressing problems<ref>{{AYref|Sackett et al.|2004}} p. 11</ref>.


===World-wide scores=== ===Socioeconomic environment===
Different aspects of the socioeconomic environment in which children are raised have been shown to correlate with part of the IQ gap, but they do not account for the entire gap.{{sfn|Hunt|2010|page=428}} According to a 2006 review, these factors account for slightly less than half of one standard deviation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Magnuson |first1=Katherine A. |last2=Duncan |first2=Greg J. |title=The role of family socioeconomic resources in the black–white test score gap among young children |journal=] |date=December 2006 |volume=26 |issue=4 |pages=365–399 |doi=10.1016/j.dr.2006.06.004}}</ref>
:''See also: ]''
The largest review of the global cognitive ability data is ]'s 2006 '']'', which organizes the data by the nine global genetic clusters identified in previous genetic cluster analysis<ref>{{AYref|Cavalli-Sforza et al.|1994}} p. 79.</ref>. In general, Lynn lists East Asians and Europeans as demonstrating the highest average scores, indigenous Americans and other Eurasians with intermediate average IQ, and Africans and Australian Aborigines with the lowest average IQ. Lynn's 2006 survey totals 620 published IQ studies from around the world, surveying a total of 813,778 tested individuals, and is an expansion by four times of the data collected in his 2002 '']'' with ]. ''IQatWoN'' received strong criticism for both error and alleged bias, but has also been used as a source of IQ data and hypotheses used in several peer-reviewed studies.<ref>Sociologist Thomas Volken argues the ''IQ and the Wealth of Nations'' data for national IQs is "highly deficient," citing limited sampling and varying tests and years (). In a 1995 review of ''The Bell Curve'', controversial critic ] writes that "Lynn's distortions and misrepresentations of the data constitute a truly venomous racism, combined with scandalous disregard for scientific objectivity."({{AYref|Kamin|1995}}). In contrast to Kamin's strongly worded attack on Lynn, ] described Lynn in a review of another of Lynn's books as doing "an excellent job with the facts" and being "brave thick-skinned ... to swim against ... popular antirealistic currents."
<br><br>Examples of problematic national IQ figures include that the stated average IQ score of 59 for Equatorial Guinea is based on one test of 48 children aged 10-14 in 1984; the Ethiopian average is derived from a study of Ethiopians who immigrated to Israel a year prior, and whose low scores were thought by the original authors to be a reflection of temporary adjustment to a different culture and language (note that this data is not used in the averages presented below). Kamin also argued Lynn selectively excluded data showing a similar score in Whites and sub-Saharan Africans: "Lynn chose to ignore the substance of Crawford-Nutt's paper, which reported that 228 black high school students in Soweto scored an average of 45 correct responses on the Matrices--HIGHER than the mean of 44 achieved by the same-age white sample on whom the test's norms had been established and well above the mean of Owen's coloured pupils." ({{AYref|Kamin|1995}})</ref>


Other research has focused on different causes of variation within low socioeconomic status (SES) and high SES groups.<ref name="Scarr-Salapatek1971">{{cite journal |last1=Scarr-Salapatek |first1=S. |year=1971 |title=Race, social class, and IQ. |journal=Science |volume=174 |issue=4016 |pages=1285–95 |doi=10.1126/science.174.4016.1285 |pmid=5167501 |bibcode=1971Sci...174.1285S}}</ref><ref name="Scarr-Salapatek1974">{{cite journal |last1=Scarr-Salapatek |first1=S. |year=1974 |title=Some myths about heritability and IQ. |doi=10.1038/251463b0 |journal=Nature |volume=251 |issue=5475 |pages=463–464 |bibcode=1974Natur.251..463S |s2cid=32437709 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Rowe1994">D. C. Rowe. (1994). ''The Limits of Family Influence: Genes, Experience and Behaviour''. Guilford Press. London</ref>
IQ scores vary greatly among different nations for related groups. Black Africans score much lower than blacks in the US, although Black Americans average about 7-20% European admixture<ref>{{AYref|Burchard et al.|2003}};{{AYref|Parra et al.|1998}}</ref>. Some reports indicate that the black–white gap is smaller in the UK than in the U.S.<ref>{{AYref|Gene Expression|2003}}</ref> but UK admixtures are not well-studied. Many studies also show differences in IQ between different groups of whites. In Israel, large gaps in test scores and achievement separate ] from other groups such as the ]<ref>{{AYref|Willms and Chen|1989}}</ref>.
In the US, among low SES groups, genetic differences account for a smaller proportion of the variance in IQ than among high SES populations.<ref name="Kirkpatrick2015">{{cite journal |last1=Kirkpatrick |first1=R. M. |last2=McGue |first2=M. |last3=Iacono |first3=W. G. |year=2015 |title=Replication of a gene-environment interaction Via Multimodel inference: additive-genetic variance in adolescents' general cognitive ability increases with family-of-origin socioeconomic status |doi=10.1007/s10519-014-9698-y |journal=Behav Genet |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=200–14 |pmc=4374354 |pmid=25539975}}</ref> Such effects are predicted by the '']'' hypothesis—that genotypes are transformed into phenotypes through nonadditive synergistic effects of the environment.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. |journal=Psychological Review |pages=568–586 |volume=101 |issue=4 |doi=10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568 |first1=Urie |last1=Bronfenbrenner |first2=Stephen J. |last2=Ceci |pmid=7984707 |date=October 1994|s2cid=17402964 }}</ref> {{harvp|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a}} suggest that high SES individuals are more likely to be able to develop their full biological potential, whereas low SES individuals are likely to be hindered in their development by adverse environmental conditions. The same review also points out that adoption studies generally are biased towards including only high and high middle SES adoptive families, meaning that they will tend to overestimate average genetic effects. They also note that studies of adoption from lower-class homes to middle-class homes have shown that such children experience a 12 to 18 point gain in IQ relative to children who remain in low SES homes.{{sfn|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a}} A 2015 study found that environmental factors (namely, family income, maternal education, maternal verbal ability/knowledge, learning materials in the home, parenting factors, child birth order, and child birth weight) accounted for the black–white gap in cognitive ability test scores.{{sfn|Cottrell|Newman|Roisman|2015}}


===Test bias===
===Brain size, employment tests, and school achievement===
A number of studies have reached the conclusion that IQ tests may be biased against certain groups.<ref>{{harvnb|Cronshaw et al.|2006|p=278}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Verney et al.|2005}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Borsboom|2006}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Shuttleworth-Edwards et al.|2004}}</ref> The validity and reliability of IQ scores obtained from outside the United States and Europe have been questioned, in part because of the inherent difficulty of comparing IQ scores between cultures.<ref name="Richardson 2004">{{harvnb|Richardson|2004}}</ref><ref name="Hunt & Wittmann 2008">{{harvnb|Hunt|Wittmann|2008}}</ref> Several researchers have argued that cultural differences limit the appropriateness of standard IQ tests in non-industrialized communities.<ref>{{harvnb|Irvine|1983}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Irvine|Berry|1988}} a collection of articles by several authors discussing the limits of assessment by intelligence tests in different communities in the world. In particular, {{harvp|Reuning|1988}} describes the difficulties in devising and administering tests for Kalahari bushmen.</ref>
IQ has a low to moderate correlation with various measures of brain size and performance on elementary tests of response time<ref>{{AYref|Neisser et al.|1996}}</ref>. For example, a ] meta-analysis found that brain size correlates with IQ by a factor of approximately .40 among adults<ref> {{AYref|McDaniel|2005}}</ref>. Reaction times correlate with IQ by about .30 to .50<ref>{{AYref|Grudnick and Kranzler|2001}}</ref>. Studies have shown racial differences in both brain size<ref>see {{AYref|Neisser|1997}}, p. 80 for a consensus statement</ref> and tests of response time<ref>see ]</ref>. Cranial vault size and shape have changed greatly during the last 150 years in the US. These changes must occur by early childhood because of the early development of the vault. The explanation for these changes may be related to the ].<ref> {{AYref|Gravlee et al.|2003a}}, {{AYref|Gravlee et al.|2003b}}; {{AYref|Jantz and Jantz|2000}}, {{AYref|Jantz|2001}}</ref>


A 1996 report by the ] states that intelligence can be difficult to compare across cultures, and notes that differing familiarity with test materials can produce substantial differences in test results; it also says that tests are accurate predictors of future achievement for black and white Americans, and are in that sense unbiased.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} The view that tests accurately predict future educational attainment is reinforced by ] in his 1998 book ''IQ and Human Intelligence'',<ref>{{harvnb|Mackintosh|1998|p=174}}: "Despite widespread belief to the contrary, however, there is ample evidence, both in Britain and the USA, that IQ tests predict educational attainment just about as well in ethnic minorities as in the white majority."</ref> and by a 1999 literature review by {{harvp|Brown|Reynolds|Whitaker|1999}}.
Gaps are seen in other tests of cognitive ability or aptitude, including university admission exams such as the ] and ], as well as employment tests for corporate settings and the military<ref>{{AYref|Roth et al.|2001}}</ref>. Measures of school achievement correlate fairly well with IQ, especially in younger children. In the United States, achievement tests find that by 12th grade black students are performing on average only as well as white and Asian students in 8th grade; Hispanic students do only slightly better than blacks. <!-- from the NAEP (mentioned in NYT, WSJ, etc) - reference? --> Whether these gaps are narrowing or not is debated.


James R. Flynn, surveying studies on the topic, notes that the weight and presence of many test questions depends on what sorts of information and modes of thinking are culturally valued.<ref name="FlynnIntelligence">{{cite journal |journal=Intelligence |issue=70 |pages=73–83 |year=2018 |url=https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/1-s2.0-S0160289618300904-main.pdf |title=Reflections about intelligence over 40 years |access-date=2019-02-02 |archive-date=2019-02-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190203030438/https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/1-s2.0-S0160289618300904-main.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
== Cultural or genetic explanation? ==
] cannot explain all the IQ gap.]]
{{main|Race and intelligence (Culture-only or partially-genetic explanation)}}


===Stereotype threat and minority status===
=== Introduction ===
{{Main|Stereotype threat}}
The most widely accepted view among intelligence researchers is that IQ differences among individuals of the same race reflect real, functionally/socially significant, and substantially genetic differences in the ], ''g''. It is likewise widely believed that average IQ differences among races reflect real and significant differences in the same ''g'' factor.<ref>{{AYref|Gottfredson|2005b}}; {{AYref|Snyderman and Rothman|1987}}; {{AYref|Neisser et al.|1996}}; {{AYref|Gottfredson|1997a}}</ref> While these conclusions are largely beyond technical dispute, the nature of ''g'' is still an active area of research.
] is the fear that one's behavior will confirm an existing ] of a group with which one identifies or by which one is defined; this fear may in turn lead to an impairment of performance.<ref>{{harvnb|Aronson|Wilson|Akert| 2005}}</ref> Testing situations that highlight the fact that intelligence is being measured tend to lower the scores of individuals from racial-ethnic groups who already score lower on average or are expected to score lower. Stereotype threat conditions cause larger than expected IQ differences among groups.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Steele |first1=Claude M. |title=A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance |journal=American Psychologist |volume=52 |issue=6 |year=1997 |pages=613–629 |issn=0003-066X |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 |pmid=9174398 |citeseerx=10.1.1.319.8283|s2cid=19952 }}</ref> Psychometrician ] considers that there is little doubt that the effects of stereotype threat contribute to the IQ gap between black people and white people.{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011|p=348}}


A large number of studies have shown that systemically disadvantaged minorities, such as the African American minority of the United States, generally perform worse in the educational system and in intelligence tests than the majority groups or less disadvantaged minorities such as immigrant or "voluntary" minorities.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} The explanation of these findings may be that children of caste-like minorities, due to the systemic limitations of their prospects of social advancement, do not have "]", i.e. they do not have the confidence that acquiring the skills valued by majority society, such as those skills measured by IQ tests, is worthwhile. They may even deliberately reject certain behaviors that are seen as "]."{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}}{{sfn|Ogbu|1978}}{{sfn|Ogbu|1994}} Research published in 1997 indicates that part of the black–white gap in cognitive ability test scores is due to racial differences in test motivation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chan |first1=D. |last2=Schmitt |first2=N. |last3=DeShon |first3=R. P. |last4=Clause |first4=C. S. |last5=Delbridge |first5=K. |date=April 1997 |title=Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation |journal=The Journal of Applied Psychology |volume=82 |issue=2 |pages=300–310 |issn=0021-9010 |pmid=9109288 |doi=10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.300|url=https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/230 }}</ref>
However, it is a matter of debate whether IQ differences among races in the U.S. are entirely environmental or partly genetic. Several published consensus statements agree that the large difference between the average IQ scores of Blacks and Whites in the U.S. cannot be attributed to biases in test construction<ref>See for example {{AYref|Gottfredson|1997a}}</ref>, nor can they be explained by simple differences in socio-economic status. These results are further supported when the artificial black-white dichotomy is supplemented with statistics for other ethnicities.


Some researchers have suggested that stereotype threat should not be interpreted as a factor in real-life performance gaps, and have raised the possibility of ].<ref name="Ganley2013">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ganley CM, Mingle LA, Ryan AM, Ryan K, Vasilyeva M, Perry M |title=An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls' mathematics performance |journal=Developmental Psychology |volume=49 |issue=10 |pages=1886–97 |date=October 2013 |pmid=23356523 |doi=10.1037/a0031412 |url=https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/85192141/2013-ganley.pdf |citeseerx=10.1.1.353.4436 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140719005546/https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/85192141/2013-ganley.pdf |archive-date=19 July 2014}}</ref><ref name="Stoet2012">{{Cite journal |vauthors=Stoet G, Geary DC |doi=10.1037/a0026617 |title=Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? |journal=Review of General Psychology |volume=16 |pages=93–102 |year=2012 |s2cid=145724069}} {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112130459/http://volition.gla.ac.uk/~stoet/pdf/Stoet-Geary-RGP2012.pdf |date=2016-01-12 }}</ref><ref name="Flore2014">{{cite journal |vauthors=Flore PC, Wicherts JM |title=Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis |journal=Journal of School Psychology |volume=53 |issue=1 |pages=25–44 |date=February 2015 |pmid=25636259 |doi=10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002|s2cid=206516995 }}</ref> Other critics have focused on correcting what they claim are misconceptions of early studies showing a large effect.<ref name="Sackett2004a">{{cite journal |vauthors=Sackett PR, Hardison CM, Cullen MJ |title=On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests |journal=The American Psychologist |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=7–13 |date=January 2004 |pmid=14736315 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.7 |url=http://www2.uni-jena.de/svw/igc/studies/ss03/sackitt_hardison_cullen_2004.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130404150510/http://www2.uni-jena.de/svw/igc/studies/ss03/sackitt_hardison_cullen_2004.pdf |archive-date=2013-04-04}}</ref> However, numerous ] and systematic reviews have shown significant evidence for the effects of stereotype threat, though the phenomenon defies over-simplistic characterization.<ref name="Pennington-2016">{{cite journal |vauthors=Pennington CR, Heim D, Levy AR, Larkin DT |date=2016-01-11 |title=Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=e0146487 |bibcode=2016PLoSO..1146487P |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0146487 |pmc=4713435 |pmid=26752551 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Nguyen-2008">{{cite journal |vauthors=Nguyen HH, Ryan AM |date=November 2008 |title=Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence |journal=The Journal of Applied Psychology |volume=93 |issue=6 |pages=1314–34 |doi=10.1037/a0012702 |pmid=19025250|s2cid=36769821 }}</ref><ref name="Walton-2009">{{Cite journal |last1=Walton |first1=Gregory M. |last2=Spencer |first2=Steven J. |date=2009-09-01 |title=Latent Ability: Grades and Test Scores Systematically Underestimate the Intellectual Ability of Negatively Stereotyped Students |journal=Psychological Science |volume=20 |issue=9 |pages=1132–1139 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x |issn=0956-7976 |pmid=19656335 |s2cid=25810191|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Gentile |first1=Ambra |last2=Boca |first2=Stefano |last3=Giammusso |first3=Isabella |date=2018-11-01 |title='You play like a Woman!' Effects of gender stereotype threat on Women's performance in physical and sport activities: A meta-analysis |journal=Psychology of Sport and Exercise |volume=39 |pages=95–103 |doi=10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.013 |s2cid=149490634 |issn=1469-0292}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lamont |first1=Ruth A. |last2=Swift |first2=Hannah J. |last3=Abrams |first3=Dominic |year=2015 |title=A Review and Meta-Analysis of Age-Based Stereotype Threat: Negative Stereotypes, Not Facts, Do the Damage. |journal=Psychology and Aging |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=180–193 |doi=10.1037/a0038586 |issn=1939-1498 |pmc=4360754 |pmid=25621742}}</ref><ref name="Picho-2013">{{Cite journal |last1=Picho |first1=Katherine |last2=Rodriguez |first2=Ariel |last3=Finnie |first3=Lauren |date=May 2013 |title=Exploring the Moderating Role of Context on the Mathematics Performance of Females Under Stereotype Threat: A Meta-Analysis |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237000996 |journal=The Journal of Social Psychology |volume=153 |issue=3 |pages=299–333 |doi=10.1080/00224545.2012.737380 |pmid=23724702 |s2cid=45950675}}</ref><ref name="Liu-2020">{{Cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Songqi |last2=Liu |first2=Pei |last3=Wang |first3=Mo |last4=Zhang |first4=Baoshan |date=July 2020 |title=Effectiveness of Stereotype Threat Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343149798 |journal=Journal of Applied Psychology |volume=currently in press |issue=6 |pages=921–949 |doi=10.1037/apl0000770 |pmid=32772526 |s2cid=221098319}}</ref>{{excessive citations inline|date=June 2024}} For instance, one meta-analysis found that with female subjects "subtle threat-activating cues produced the largest effect, followed by blatant and moderately explicit cues" while with minorities "moderately explicit stereotype threat-activating cues produced the largest effect, followed by blatant and subtle cues".<ref name="Nguyen-2008" />
It should be noted that most research has been done in the US and a few other developed nations (see ] for worldwide data). That research cannot directly be generalized to the world as a whole. Blacks in the US do not constitute a random sample of the original African population, and environmental conditions differ among nations. IQ tests done in developing countries are likely to have been affected by conditions associated with poverty that are common in the developing world, such as nutritional deficiencies and the impact of diseases (for example, HIV, anemia or chronic parasites) that may affect IQ test scores.


Some researchers have argued that studies of stereotype threat may in fact systematically under-represent its effects, since such studies measure "only that portion of psychological threat that research has identified and remedied. To the extent that unidentified or unremedied psychological threats further undermine performance, the results underestimate the bias."<ref name="Walton-2009"/>
The extent to which the IQ gap is caused by genetic or environmental factors is logically independent of the ability for intervention to reduce the gap. A genetic cause is not necessarily irremediable (e.g. ], ], and ]) and an environmental cause may not be remediable (e.g. accidents and some diseases). Based in part on this distinction, {{A(Y)ref|Murray and Herrnstein|1994}} argue that determining the extent to which genes or environment cause the IQ gap is unimportant.<ref>Murry and Herrnstein argue that it would not be good to learn that the gap were predominantly environmental nor bad to learn that the gap were predominantly genetic. Instead, they argue that that what matters is how hard the gap is to change. They argue that the history of attempts to reduce the gap through environmental intervention have produced no definitive, lasting results. As such, even if the gap were entirely environmental, we would be no closer to changing it. They also argue that knowing whether the gap is genetic or environmental should not affect how individuals treat one another. First, because individuals should be treated as individuals rather than as groups. Second, because the reality of the gap is independent of the cause of the gap (that is, it would make no difference to learn that the gap were "only" caused by the environment.</ref>


==Research into possible genetic factors==
=== Cultural explanations ===
{{see also|Heritability of IQ}}
Although IQ is regarded as being highly heritable, this does not mean that IQ differences between racial groups are necessarily genetic in origin, because estimates of heritability are dependent on a given environment. For example, in , also regarded as being highly heritable, increased rates in second and third generation black immigrants to Western European countries do not seem to be the result of increased genetic susceptibility, but another, as yet unidentified, environmental factor.
Although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that mean group-level disparities (between-group differences) in IQ necessarily have a genetic basis.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Nisbett |first1=Richard E. |last2=Aronson |first2=Joshua |last3=Blair |first3=Clancy |last4=Dickens |first4=William |last5=Flynn |first5=James |last6=Halpern |first6=Diane F. |last7=Turkheimer |first7=Eric |date=2012 |title=Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. |journal=American Psychologist |language=en |volume=67 |issue=2 |pages=130–159 |doi=10.1037/a0026699 |issn=1935-990X |pmid=22233090}}</ref><ref name="Nisbett-2012" /> The scientific consensus is that there is no evidence for a genetic component behind IQ differences between racial groups.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Bird |first1=Kevin |last2=Jackson |first2=John P. |last3=Winston |first3=Andrew S. |date=2024 |title=Confronting Scientific Racism in Psychology: Lessons from Evolutionary Biology and Genetics |url=https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Famp0001228 |journal=American Psychologist |volume=79 |issue=4 |pages=497–508 |doi=10.1037/amp0001228 |pmid=39037836 |quote=Recent articles claim that the folk categories of race are genetically meaningful divisions, and that evolved genetic differences among races and nations are important for explaining immutable differences in cognitive ability, educational attainment, crime, sexual behavior, and wealth; all claims that are opposed by a strong scientific consensus to the contrary.}}</ref>{{sfn|Ceci|Williams|2009|pages=788–789, "There is an emerging consensus about racial and gender equality in genetic determinants of intelligence; most researchers, including ourselves, agree that genes do not explain between-group differences"}}{{sfn|Hunt|2010|page=447|ps= , "It is worth remembering that no genes related to difference in cognitive skills across the various racial and ethnic groups have ever been discovered. The argument for genetic differences has been carried forward largely by circumstantial evidence. Of course, tomorrow afternoon genetic mechanisms producing racial and ethnic differences in intelligence might be discovered, but there have been a lot of investigations, and tomorrow has not come for quite some time now."}}{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011||pages=334–338, 344}}<ref name="Nisbett-2012">{{cite journal |last1=Nisbett |first1=Richard E. |last2=Aronson |first2=Joshua |last3=Blair |first3=Clancy |last4=Dickens |first4=William |last5=Flynn |first5=James |author-link5=Jim Flynn (academic) |last6=Halpern |first6=Diane F. |author-link6=Diane F. Halpern |last7=Turkheimer |first7=Eric |date=2012 |title=Group differences in IQ are best understood as environmental in origin |journal=American Psychologist |volume=67 |number=6 |pages=503–504 |doi=10.1037/a0029772 |issn=0003-066X |pmid=22963427 |author-link1=Richard E. Nisbett}}</ref><ref name="Kaplan-2015">{{Cite journal |last=Kaplan |first=Jonathan Michael |date=January 2015 |title=Race, IQ, and the search for statistical signals associated with so-called "X"-factors: environments, racism, and the "hereditarian hypothesis" |journal=Biology & Philosophy |language=en |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.1007/s10539-014-9428-0 |s2cid=85351431 |issn=0169-3867}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Panofsky |first1=Aaron |last2=Dasgupta |first2=Kushan |last3=Iturriaga |first3=Nicole |title=How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |year=2021 |volume=175 |issue=2 |pages=387–398 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.24150 |issn=0002-9483 |pmid=32986847 |pmc=9909835 |quote=he claims that genetics defines racial groups and makes them different, that IQ and cultural differences among racial groups are caused by genes, and that racial inequalities within and between nations are the inevitable outcome of long evolutionary processes are neither new nor supported by science (either old or new). |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="LewontinSameTitle">{{cite journal |last1=Lewontin |first1=Richard C. |title=Race and Intelligence |journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |date=March 1970 |volume=26 |issue=3 |pages=2–8 |doi=10.1080/00963402.1970.11457774 |bibcode=1970BuAtS..26c...2L |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00963402.1970.11457774 |access-date=26 April 2021 |archive-date=10 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210610120351/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00963402.1970.11457774 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} Growing evidence indicates that environmental factors, not genetic ones, explain the racial IQ gap.{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2006}}<ref name="Nisbett-2012" />{{sfn|Nevid|2014|page=271}}<ref name="Kaplan-2015" />


===Genetics of race and intelligence===
Regarding the IQ gaps in the U.S., it has also been suggested that ] culture disfavors academic achievement and fosters an environment that is damaging to IQ<ref>{{AYref|Boykin|1994}}</ref>. Likewise, it is argued that the persistence of negative racial stereotypes reinforces this effect. John Ogbu has developed a hypothesis that the condition of being a "caste-like minority" affects motivation and achievement, depressing IQ<ref>{{AYref|Ogbu|1978}}; {{AYref|Ogbu|2003}}. See {{AYref|Jensen|1998b}}, pp. 511-512 for a critique of these arguments.</ref>. Similarly, it's suggested reduced performance from "stereotype threat" could be a contributing factor.<ref>{{AYref|Steele and Aronson|1995}} found that making race salient when taking a test of cognitive ability negatively affected high-ability African American students. They name this phenomenon stereotype threat. {{AYref|Sackett et al.|2004}} point out that these findings are widely misinterpreted to mean that eliminating stereotype threat eliminated the Black-White performance gap. See also {{AYref|Cohen and Sherman|2005}}, {{AYref|Helms|2005}}, {{AYref|Wicherts|2005}} and {{AYref|Sackett et al.|2005}} for discussion of the implications of stereotype threat for race and intelligence research.</ref>
{{main|Race and genetics}}
] discovered the ], that average IQ scores are increasing worldwide.]]
Geneticist ] argued that the question about the possible genetic effects on the test score gap is muddled by the general focus on "race" rather than on populations defined by gene frequency or by geographical proximity, and by the general insistence on phrasing the question in terms of heritability.<ref name="Templeton 2001">{{harvnb|Templeton|2001}}</ref> Templeton pointed out that racial groups neither represent ] nor distinct ], and that therefore there is no basis for making claims about the general intelligence of races.<ref name="Templeton 2001"/> He argued that, for these reasons, the search for possible genetic influences on the black–white test score gap is ''a priori'' flawed, because there is no genetic material shared by all Africans or by all Europeans. {{harvp|Mackintosh|2011}}, on the other hand, argued that by using genetic cluster analysis to correlate gene frequencies with continental populations it might be possible to show that African populations have a higher frequency of certain genetic variants that contribute to differences in average intelligence. Such a hypothetical situation could hold without all Africans carrying the same genes or belonging to a single evolutionary lineage. According to Mackintosh, a biological basis for the observed gap in IQ test performance thus cannot be ruled out on ''a priori'' grounds.{{Page needed|date=January 2022}}


{{harvtxt|Hunt|2010|page=447}} noted that "no genes related to difference in cognitive skills have across the various racial and ethnic groups have ever been discovered. The argument for genetic differences has been carried forward largely by circumstantial evidence. Of course, tomorrow afternoon genetic mechanisms producing racial and ethnic differences in intelligence might be discovered, but there have been a lot of investigations, and tomorrow has not come for quite some time now." {{harvtxt|Mackintosh|2011|page=344}} concurred, noting that while several environmental factors have been shown to influence the IQ gap, the evidence for a genetic influence has been negligible. A 2012 review by {{harvp|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair| Dickens|2012a}} concluded that the entire IQ gap can be explained by known environmental factors, and Mackintosh found this view to be plausible.
Many anthropologists have argued that intelligence is a cultural category; some cultures emphasize speed and competition more than others, for example. Speculations about innate differences in intelligence between ethnic groups have occurred throughout history. ] in the 4th century B.C. and ] in the 1rst. century B.C. disparaged the intelligence of the northern Europeans of the time, as did the ]s in ] in the 11th century.
<ref>Aristotle: "Having spoken of the number of the citizens, we will proceed to speak of what should be their character. This is a subject which can be easily understood by any one who casts his eye on the more celebrated states of ], and generally on the distribution of races in the habitable world. Those who live in a cold climate and in Europe are full of spirit, but wanting in intelligence and skill; and therefore they retain comparative freedom, but have no political organization, and are incapable of ruling over others. Whereas the natives of Asia are intelligent and inventive, but they are wanting in spirit, and therefore they are always in a state of subjection and slavery. But the Hellenic race, which is situated between them, is likewise intermediate in character, being high-spirited and also intelligent. Hence it continues free, and is the best-governed of any nation, and, if it could be formed into one state, would be able to rule the world. ” (Aristotle, '']'', ).
<br>
]: “Do not obtain your slaves from Britain because they are so stupid and so utterly incapable of being taught that they are not fit to form a part of the household of Athens.” Attributed to Cicero's ''Epistulae ad Atticum'' (Letters to Atticus), 68 BC-43 BC (). Translation: {{AYref|Cicero|1918}}.
<br>
"Races north of the ] are of cold temperament and never reach maturity; they are of great stature and of a white colour. But they lack all sharpness of wit and penetration of intellect." Attributed to "Said of Toledo (a ]ish savant)" by {{AYref|Benedict|1999}} (p.34), originally quoted in {{AYref|Hogben|1931}}.</ref>


More recent research attempting to identify genetic loci associated with individual-level differences in IQ has yielded promising results, which led the editorial board of '']'' to issue a statement differentiating this research from the "racist" pseudoscience which it acknowledged has dogged intelligence research since its inception.<ref name="Nature-2017" /> It characterized the idea of genetically determined differences in intelligence between races as definitively false.<ref name="Nature-2017">{{Cite journal |date=25 May 2017 |title=Intelligence research should not be held back by its past |journal=Nature |volume=545 |issue=7655 |pages=385–386 |doi=10.1038/nature.2017.22021 |pmid=28541341 |bibcode=2017Natur.545R.385. |s2cid=4449918|doi-access=free }}</ref> Analysis of polygenic scores sampled from the 1000 Genomes Project has likewise found no evidence that intelligence was under diversifying selection in Africans and Europeans, suggesting that genetic differences make up a negligible component of the observed Black-White gap in IQ.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bird |first=Kevin A. |date=2 February 2021 |title=No support for the hereditarian hypothesis of the Black–White achievement gap using polygenic scores and tests for divergent selection |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24216 |journal=] |language=en |volume=175 |issue=2 |pages=465–476 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.24216 |pmid=33529393 |issn=0002-9483 |access-date=1 November 2024 |via=Wiley Online Library}}</ref>
Even proponents of the view that the IQ gap is caused partly by genetic differences recognize that non-genetic factors are likely to be involved.


===Heritability within and between groups===
In the developing world many factors can greatly decrease IQ scores. Examples include nutrition deficiencies in ] and ]; certain diseases like ]; unregulated toxic industrial substances like ] and ]; and poor health care for pregnant women and infants. Also in the developed world there are many non-genetic biological factors that can affect IQ. Increased rates of low birth weight babies and lower rates of breastfeeding in Blacks as compared to Whites are some factors of many that have been proposed to affect the IQ gap.<ref>See ]</ref> Indeed, one author has compiled a list of over one hundred possible causes of the Black-White IQ gap.
].|330x330px]]


] of intelligence have reported high heritability values. However, these studies have been criticized for being based on questionable assumptions.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Carson |first1=Michael |title='Race', IQ and Genes |last2=Beckwith |first2=Jon |date=2001 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |isbn=978-0-470-01590-2 |pages=1–5 |language=en |doi=10.1002/9780470015902.a0005689.pub3}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Beckwith |first1=Jon |last2=Morris |first2=Corey A. |date=December 2008 |title=Twin Studies of Political Behavior: Untenable Assumptions? |journal=Perspectives on Politics |language=en |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=785–791 |doi=10.1017/S1537592708081917 |s2cid=55630117 |issn=1541-0986 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kamin |first1=Leon J. |last2=Goldberger |first2=Arthur S. |date=February 2002 |title=Twin Studies in Behavioral Research: A Skeptical View |journal=Theoretical Population Biology |volume=61 |issue=1 |pages=83–95 |doi=10.1006/tpbi.2001.1555 |pmid=11895384 |bibcode=2002TPBio..61...83K |issn=0040-5809}}</ref> When used in the context of human ], the term "heritability" can be misleading, as it does not necessarily convey information about the relative importance of genetic or environmental factors on the development of a given trait, nor does it convey the extent to which that trait is genetically determined.{{sfn|Moore|Shenk|2016}} Arguments in support of a genetic explanation of racial differences in IQ are sometimes fallacious. For instance, hereditarians have sometimes cited the failure of known environmental factors to account for such differences, or the high heritability of intelligence within races, as evidence that racial differences in IQ are genetic.<ref>{{harvnb|Mackenzie|1984}}</ref>
The poorly understood ] is often cited as evidence that average IQ scores have changed greatly and rapidly, noting that average IQ in the US, after norming to today's standards, may have been below 75 before the start of this effect. This means, given the same test, the mean Black American performance today could be higher than the mean White American performance in 1920, though the gains causing this appear to have only occurred predominantly in the lower half of the IQ distribution<ref>{{AYref|Colom et al.|2005}}</ref>. Some therefore argue that the IQ gap among races might change in the future or is even now be changing. On the supposition that the effect started earlier for Whites, because their social and economical conditions began to improve earlier than did those of Blacks, they see even more promise in this hypothesis. However, after analyzing IQ data, one research group concluded that "the gains cannot be explained solely by increases at the level of the latent variables (common factors), which IQ tests purport to measure". In other words, according to this study, some of the inter-generational difference in IQ is attributable to bias or other artifacts, and not real gains in ] or higher-order ability factors, unlike the B-W IQ gap.<ref>({{AYref|Wicherts et al.|2004}})</ref>


Psychometricians have found that intelligence is substantially heritable within populations, with 30–50% of variance in IQ scores in early childhood being attributable to genetic factors in analyzed US populations, increasing to 75–80% by late adolescence.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}}<ref name="Deary, Johnson & Houlihan 2009">{{harvnb|Deary|Johnson|Houlihan|2009}}</ref> In biology heritability is defined as the ratio of variation attributable to genetic differences in an observable ] to the trait's total observable variation. The heritability of a trait describes the proportion of variation in the trait that is attributable to genetic factors within a particular population. A heritability of 1 indicates that variation correlates fully with genetic variation and a heritability of 0 indicates that there is no correlation between the trait and genes at all. In psychological testing, heritability tends to be understood as the degree of correlation between the results of a test taker and those of their biological parents. However, since high heritability is simply a correlation between child and parents, it does not describe the causes of heritability which in humans can be either genetic or environmental.
A recent theory hypothesizes that fluid cognition (gF') may be separable from general intelligence, and that gF' may be very susceptible to environmental factors, in particular early childhood ]. Some IQ tests, especially those used with children, are poor measures of gF', which means that the effect of the environment on intelligence regarding racial differences, the Flynn effect, early childhood intervention, and life outcomes may have been underestimated in many studies.


Therefore, a high heritability measure does not imply that a trait is genetic or unchangeable. In addition, environmental factors that affect all group members equally will not be measured by heritability, and the heritability of a trait may also change over time in response to changes in the distribution of genetic and environmental factors.{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} High heritability does not imply that all of the heritability is genetically determined; rather, it can also be due to environmental differences that affect only a certain genetically defined group (indirect heritability).<ref name="Block 2002">{{harvnb|Block|2002}}</ref>
Many studies that attempt to test for heritability find results that do not support the genetic hypothesis. They include studies on IQ and skin color<ref>{{AYref|Shuey|1966}}</ref>, self-reported European ancestry<ref>{{AYref|Jenkins|1936}}</ref>, children in post WWII Germany born to Black and White American soldiers<ref>{{AYref|Eyferth|1961}}</ref>, blood groups<ref>{{AYref|Scarr et al.|1977}}, {{AYref|Loehlin et al.|1973}}</ref>, and mixed-race children born to either a Black or a White mother<ref>{{AYref|Willerman et al.|1974}}</ref>. Many intervention and adoption studies also find results that do not support the genetic hypothesis. Non-hereditarians have argued that these are direct tests of the genetic hypothesis and of more value than indirect variables, such as skull size and reaction time.<ref>{{AYref|Nisbett|2005}}</ref>. Hereditarians argue that these studies are flawed, or that they do support the partly-genetic hypothesis<ref>{{AYref|Rushton and Jensen|2005b}} argue that these studies are "peculiarly old, the mean year of publication being 1960" and "actually very weak and nondecisive, not having been replicated even once". {{AYref|Jensen|1998b}}, for example, points out that while the study of children born in post-WWII Germany finds no difference between white and interracial children, it does find a large difference in IQ between boys and girls, suggesting that sampling artifacts have affected the results.</ref>.


The figure to the right demonstrates how heritability works. In each of the two gardens the difference between tall and short cornstalks is 100% heritable, as cornstalks that are genetically disposed for growing tall will become taller than those without this disposition. But the difference in height between the cornstalks to the left and those on the right is 100% environmental, as it is due to different nutrients being supplied to the two gardens. Hence, the causes of differences within a group and between groups may not be the same, even when looking at traits that are highly heritable.<ref name="Block 2002" />
=== Genetic explanations ===
] in 1969.]]
Arthur Jensen and others have concluded that the IQ gap is substantially genetic. Rushton and Jensen argue that while plausible environmental explanation for the lower mean IQ in Blacks in the U.S. can be offered in many cases, these explanations are less capable of explaining the higher average IQ of East Asians than Whites. Under their interpretation of ]'s technical concept of ], Jensen and Rushton argue that the culture-only hypothesis is not "progressive" but "degenerating"<ref>{{AYref|Rushton and Jensen|2005a}}</ref>.


=== Spearman's hypothesis ===
To support these claims, they most often cite:
{{Main|Spearman's hypothesis}}
#worldwide Black–White–East Asian differences in IQ, reaction time, and brain size, with Black-White IQ differences observable in the U.S. at every age above 3 years, within every occupation or socioeconomic level, in every region of the country, and at every time since the invention of ability tests.
Spearman's hypothesis states that the magnitude of the black–white difference in tests of cognitive ability depends entirely or mainly on the extent to which a test measures general mental ability, or ''g''. The hypothesis was first formalized by ], who devised the statistical "method of correlated vectors" to test it. If Spearman's hypothesis holds true, then the cognitive tasks that have the highest ''g''-load are the tasks in which the gap between black and white test takers are greatest. Jensen and Rushton took this to show that the cause of ''g'' and the cause of the gap are the same—in their view, genetic differences.{{sfn|Rushton|Jensen|2005}}
#Race differences are most pronounced on tests that are the best measures of ''g''<ref>For example, see {{AYref|Rushton and Jensen|2003}}</ref>(see ]), which also show the highest heritability, show the highest ] scores<ref>{{AYref|Rushton|1989a}}</ref>, and on tests which are the least culturally loaded
#The rising ] with age (within races; on average haritability starts at 20% in infants, rises to 40% in middle childhood, and peaks at 80% in adulthood) and the disappearance (~0.0) by adulthood of shared environmental effects on IQ (for example, family income, education, and home environment), making adopted siblings no more similar in IQ than strangers<ref>{{AYref|Plomin et al.|2001}}</ref>
#] to differing means for different races.


{{harvtxt|Mackintosh|2011|pages=338–39}} acknowledges that Jensen and Rushton showed a modest correlation between ''g''-loading, heritability, and the test score gap, but does not agree that this demonstrates a genetic origin of the gap. Mackintosh argues that it is exactly those tests that Rushton and Jensen consider to have the highest ''g''-loading and heritability, such as the Wechsler test, that have seen the greatest increases in black performance due to the Flynn effect. This likely suggests that they are also the most sensitive to environmental changes, which undermines Jensen's argument that the black–white gap is most likely caused by genetic factors. {{harvtxt|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a|page=146}} make the same point, noting also that the increase in the IQ scores of black test takers necessarily indicates an increase in ''g''.
For fuller listings of evidence for the partly-genetic position, see ], {{A(Y)ref|Rushton and Jensen|2005a}}, or .


James Flynn argued that his findings undermine Spearman's hypothesis.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Flynn |first1=J.R. |year=1999 |title=Searching for justice: the discovery of IQ gains over time |url=http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuff_for_blog/flynn.pdf |url-status=live |journal=American Psychologist |volume=54 |pages=5–9 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.54.1.5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100625085640/http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuff_for_blog/flynn.pdf |archive-date=25 June 2010 |access-date=26 October 2017}}</ref> In a 2006 study, he and William Dickens found that between 1972 and 2002 "The standard measure of the ''g'' gap between Blacks and Whites declined virtually in tandem with the IQ gap."{{sfn|Dickens|Flynn|2006}} Flynn also criticized Jensen's basic assumption that a correlation between ''g''-loading and test score gap implies a genetic cause for the gap.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Flynn |first=James R. |year=2010 |title=The spectacles through which I see the race and IQ debate |url=http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/flynn2010a.pdf |journal=Intelligence |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=363–366 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.001 |access-date=2011-02-18 |archive-date=2020-12-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201207224050/http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/flynn2010a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> In a 2014 suite of meta-analyses, along with co-authors Jan te Nijenhuis and Daniel Metzen, he showed that the same negative correlation between IQ gains and ''g''-loading obtains for cognitive deficits of known environmental cause: ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Flynn |first1=James R. |last2=te Nijenhuis |first2=Jan |last3=Metzen |first3=Daniel |date=2014 |title=The g beyond Spearman's g: Flynn's paradoxes resolved using four exploratory meta-analyses |url=https://james-flynn.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/flynn2014-The-g-beyond-Spearmans-g-Flynns-paradoxes-resolved-using-four-exploratory-meta-analyses.pdf |journal=Intelligence |volume=44 |pages=1–10|doi=10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.009 }}</ref>
{{A(Y)ref|Rushton and Jensen|2005a}} have concluded that the best explanation is that 50%-80% of the group differences in average IQ is genetic.<ref>{{AYref|Rushton and Jensen|2005a}}, cited in "", and {{AYref|Murray|2005}}</ref> Other evidence, such as ], differing SAT scores even when matched for socioeconomic status and parental education, certain racial admixture studies, "life-history" traits, and evolutionary explanations have also been proposed to indicate a genetic contribution to the IQ gaps and explain how these arose. Critics of this view, such as ], argue that these studies are either flawed and thus inconclusive, or else that they support the culture-only hypothesis. A 2001 study by Dolan and Hamaker reanalyzed the data from several earlier studies and concluded that Spearman's hypothesis is not an "empirically established fact".
===Adoption studies===
A number of IQ studies have been done on the effect of similar rearing conditions on children from different races. The hypothesis is that this can be determined by investigating whether black children adopted into white families demonstrated gains in IQ test scores relative to black children reared in black families. Depending on whether their test scores are more similar to their biological or adoptive families, that could be interpreted as supporting either a genetic or an environmental hypothesis. Critiques of such studies question whether the environment of black children—even when raised in white families—is truly comparable to the environment of white children. Several reviews of the ] literature have suggested that it is probably impossible to avoid confounding biological and environmental factors in this type of study.{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011|p=337}} Another criticism by {{harvtxt|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a|pages=134}} is that adoption studies on the whole tend to be carried out in a restricted set of environments, mostly in the medium-high SES range, where heritability is higher than in the low-SES range.


The ] (1976) examined the ] test scores of 122 ] children and 143 nonadopted children reared by advantaged white families. The children were restudied ten years later.<ref name="Weinberg 1992">{{harvnb|Weinberg|Scarr|Waldman|1992}}</ref>{{sfn|Scarr|Weinberg|1976}}{{sfn|Loehlin|2000|p=185}} The study found higher IQ for white people compared to black people, both at age 7 and age 17.<ref name="Weinberg 1992"/> Acknowledging the existence of confounding factors, Scarr and Weinberg, the authors of the original study, did not consider that it provided support for either the hereditarian or environmentalist view.{{sfn|Scarr|Weinberg|1990}}
Five recent studies have shown that some genes involved in brain development and other neuronal functions have variants that have spread to high frequencies under selective pressure and now occur in different frequencies in different global populations. The novel variants of microcephalin and ASPM, genes previously implicated in the evolution of human brain size, were found at low frequencies in sub-Saharan African populations, at 70% and 50% in Europeans, 70% and less than 50% in East Asians, and microcephalin at 100% in the tested South American Indian populations. ASPM is estimated to have arisen 500-14,100 years ago, with researchers favouring 5,800 as most likely. Different populations may utilize different variants to respond to similar evolutionary pressures.<ref name="brain alleles"/>


Three other studies lend support to environmental explanations of group IQ differences:
=== Expert opinion ===
*{{harvp|Eyferth|1961}} studied the out-of-wedlock children of black and white soldiers stationed in Germany after World War II who were then raised by white German mothers in what has become known as the ]. He found no significant differences in average IQ between groups.
*{{harvp|Tizard et al.|1972}} studied black (West Indian), white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. Two out of three tests found no significant differences. One test found higher scores for non-white people.
*{{harvp|Moore|1986}} compared black and mixed-race children adopted by either black or white middle-class families in the United States. Moore observed that 23 black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean score than 23 age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained these differences.


Frydman and Lynn (1989) showed a mean IQ of 119 for Korean infants adopted by Belgian families. After correcting for the ], the IQ of the adopted Korean children was still 10 points higher than that of the Belgian children.{{sfn|Loehlin|2000|p=187}}<ref name="Frydman and Lynn">{{cite journal |author=Frydman and Lynn |journal=Personality and Individual Differences |volume=10 |issue=12 |pages=1323–1325 |year=1989 |title=The intelligence of Korean children adopted in Belgium |doi=10.1016/0191-8869(89)90246-8}}</ref>
In a ] of scholars in specialties related to IQ in Education, Psychology, Sociology, and Cognitive Science, given four choices, 52.9% of respondents supported the "partly genetic" position, 1.2% of respondents supported the "entirely genetic" position, 17.7% supported the "entirely environmental" position, and 28.2% responded that there was insufficient data "to support any reasonable opinion"<ref>{{AYref|Snyderman and Rothman|1987}}. Critics accept the results of this survey. ], for example, defends the minority view, stating "science isn't done by majority rule" (1995).</ref>. Respondents on average called themselves slightly left of center politically, but political and social opinions accounted for less than 10% of the variation in responses.


Reviewing the evidence from adoption studies, Mackintosh finds that environmental and genetic variables remain confounded and considers evidence from adoption studies inconclusive, and fully compatible with a 100% environmental explanation.{{sfn|Mackintosh|2011|page=337}} Similarly, Drew Thomas argues that race differences in IQ that appear in adoption studies are in fact an artifact of methodology, and that East Asian IQ advantages and black IQ disadvantages disappear when this is controlled for.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Thomas |first1=Drew |year=2017 |title=Racial IQ Differences among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact? |journal=Journal of Intelligence |volume=5 |issue=1 |page=1 |doi=10.3390/jintelligence5010001 |pmid=31162392 |pmc=6526420 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
According to the ], in contrast:


===Racial admixture studies===
<blockquote>It is sometimes suggested that the Black/White differential in psychometric intelligence is partly due to genetic differences (Jensen, 1972). There is not much direct evidence on this point, but what little there is fails to support the genetic hypothesis.</blockquote>
Most people have ancestry from different geographical regions. In particular, African Americans typically have ancestors from both Africa and Europe, with, on average, 20% of their genome inherited from European ancestors.<ref>{{harvnb|Bryc et al.|2009}}</ref> If racial IQ gaps have a partially genetic basis, one might expect black people with a higher degree of European ancestry to score higher on IQ tests than black people with less European ancestry, because the genes inherited from European ancestors would likely include some genes with a positive effect on IQ.{{sfn|Loehlin|2000}} Geneticist ] has argued that an experiment based on the Mendelian "common garden" design, where specimens with different hybrid compositions are subjected to the same environmental influences, are the only way to definitively show a causal relation between genes and group differences in IQ. Summarizing the findings of admixture studies, he concludes that they have shown no significant correlation between any cognitive ability and the degree of African or European ancestry.{{sfn|Templeton|2001}}


Studies have employed different ways of measuring or approximating relative degrees of ancestry from Africa and Europe. Some studies have used skin color as a measure, and others have used blood groups. {{harvp|Loehlin|2000}} surveys the literature and argues that the blood groups studies may be seen as providing some support to the genetic hypothesis, even though the correlation between ancestry and IQ was quite low. He finds that studies by {{harvp|Eyferth|1961}}, Willerman, Naylor & Myrianthopoulos (1970) did not find a correlation between degree of African/European ancestry and IQ. The latter study did find a difference based on the race of the mother, with children of white mothers with black fathers scoring higher than children of black mothers and white fathers. Loehlin considers that such a finding is compatible with either a genetic or an environmental cause. All in all Loehlin finds admixture studies inconclusive and recommends more research.
The APA journal that published the statement, '']'', subsequently published eleven critical responses in January 1997, most arguing that the report failed to examine adequately the evidence for partly-genetic explanations. ], for instance, responded:<blockquote>Actually, there is no direct evidence at all, just a wide variety of indirect evidence, almost all of which the task force chose to ignore.<ref>Murray lists race differences in brain size, along with "IQ in sub-Saharan Africa, the results of transracial adoption studies, the correlation of the black-white difference with the g-loadedness of tests, regression to racial means across the range of IQ, or other relevant data" among the evidence omitted from the task force report.</ref></blockquote>


Reviewing the evidence from admixture studies {{harvp|Hunt|2010}} considers it to be inconclusive because of too many uncontrolled variables. {{harvtxt|Mackintosh|2011|p=338}} quotes a statement by {{harvp|Nisbett|2009}} to the effect that admixture studies have not provided a shred of evidence in favor of a genetic basis for the IQ gap.
Coming advances in ] and ] are expected to soon provide the ability to test hypotheses about group differences more rigorously than has as yet been possible.<ref>{{AYref|Pinker|2006}}, {{AYref|Stock|2002}} pp. 44-47.</ref>


===Mental chronometry===
Researchers who believe that there is no significant genetic contribution to race differences in intelligence include {{AYref|Flynn|1980}}, {{AYref|Brody|1992}}, {{AYref|Neisser et al.|1996}}, {{AYref|Nisbett|1998}}, {{AYref|Mackintosh|1998}}, {{AYref|Jencks and Phillips|1998}}, and {{AYref|Fish|2002}}. Some scientists who emphasize cultural explanations do not necessarily exclude a small genetic influence. {{A(Y)ref|Reynolds|2000}} suggests up to 20% genetic influence be included in the cultural explanation. Researchers who believe that there are significant genetic contributions to race differences in intelligence include {{AYref|McGurk|1953}}, {{AYref|Garrett|1961}}, {{AYref|Shuey|1966}}, {{AYref|Shockley|1968}}, {{AYref|Eysenck|1971}}, {{AYref|Baker|1974}}, {{AYref|Loehlin et al.|1975}}, {{AYref|Vernon|1979}}, {{AYref|Lynn|1991a}}, {{AYref|Waldman et al.|1994}}, {{AYref|Scarr|1995}}, {{AYref|Levin|1997}}, {{AYref|Jensen|1998b}}, {{AYref|Rushton|2000}}, and {{AYref|Gottfredson|2005b}}.
{{Main|Mental chronometry}}
] measures the elapsed time between the presentation of a sensory stimulus and the subsequent behavioral response by the participant. These studies have shown inconsistent results when comparing black and white populations groups, with some studies showing whites outperforming blacks, and others showing blacks outperforming whites.{{sfn|Sheppard|Vernon|2008}}


Arthur Jensen argued that this reaction time (RT) is a measure of the speed and efficiency with which the brain processes information,<ref name="Jensen 2006">{{harvnb|Jensen|2006}}</ref> and that scores on most types of RT tasks tend to correlate with scores on standard IQ tests as well as with ''g''.<ref name="Jensen 2006" /> Nisbett argues that some studies have found correlations closer to 0.2, and that a correlation is not always found.<ref name="Nisbett 2009">{{harvnb|Nisbett|2009}}</ref> Nisbett points to the {{harvp|Jensen|Whang|1993}} study in which a group of Chinese Americans had longer reaction times than a group of European Americans, despite having higher IQs. Nisbett also mentions findings in {{harvp|Flynn|1991}} and {{harvp|Deary|2001}} suggesting that movement time (the measure of how long it takes a person to move a finger after making the decision to do so) correlates with IQ just as strongly as reaction time, and that average movement time is faster for black people than for white people.{{sfn|Nisbett|2009|pp=221–2}} {{harvtxt|Mackintosh|2011|page=339}} considers reaction time evidence unconvincing and comments that other cognitive tests that also correlate well with IQ show no disparity at all, for example the habituation/] test. He further comments that studies show that rhesus monkeys have shorter reaction times than American college students, suggesting that different reaction times may not tell us anything useful about intelligence.
==Significance of group IQ differences==
:''See also: ]''


===Within societies=== ===Brain size===
{{main|Brain size}}
There is substantial overlap in the distribution of IQ scores among individuals of each race. {{A(Y)ref|Jensen|1998b}} (p. 357) estimates that in a random sample of equal numbers of US Blacks and Whites, most of variance in IQ would be unrelated to race or social class.<ref>Equal-sized random samples of children from California schools were used for this analysis. Social class was rated on a ten-point scale based on parents' education and occupation. Only 30% of total variance in IQ is associated with differences between race and social class, whereas 65% exists within each racial and social class group. The single largest source of IQ variance exists between siblings within the same family.</ref> The average IQ difference between two randomly paired people from the U.S. population, one Black and one White, is approximately 20 points. However, by the same method of calculation, the average difference between two random people is approximately 17 points, and the average difference between two siblings is 12 points.
A number of studies have reported a moderate statistical correlation between differences in IQ and brain size between individuals in the same group.{{sfn|Deary|Penke|Johnson|2010}}{{sfn|McDaniel|2005}} Some scholars have reported differences in average brain sizes between racial groups,{{sfn|Ho et al.|1980}} although this is unlikely to be a good measure of IQ as brain size also differs between men and women, but without significant differences in IQ.{{sfn|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a}} At the same time newborn black children have the same average brain size as white children, suggesting that the difference in average size could be accounted for by differences in environment.{{sfn|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a}} Several environmental factors that reduce brain size have been demonstrated to disproportionately affect black children.{{sfn|Nisbett|Aronson|Blair|Dickens|2012a}}


===Archaeological data===
In essays accompanying the publication of '']'', Herrnstein and Murray argue that whether the cause of the IQ gap is partly genetic or entirely environmental does not really matter because that knowledge alone would not help to eliminate the gap and that knowledge should not impact the way that individuals treat one another. They argue that group differences in intelligence ought not to be treated as more important or threatening than individual differences, but suggest that one legacy of Black slavery has been to exacerbate race relations such that Blacks and Whites cannot be comfortable with group differences in IQ or any other traits.<ref>{{AYref|Murray and Herrnstein|1994}}, {{AYref|Murray|2005}}</ref>
Archaeological evidence does not support claims by Rushton and others that black people's cognitive ability was inferior to white people's during prehistoric times.{{sfn|MacEachern|2006}}


==Policy relevance and ethics==
Moreover, although it may appear paradoxical, a goal of social egalitarianism is to raise the genetic contribution to intelligence to as high as possible, by minimizing environmental inequalities and any negatively IQ-impacting cultural differences ('']'', 106-107). If such conditions were achieved, any remaining group (but not individual) IQ differences would then be 100% hereditary: the only remaining factor that could potentially contribute to race-based outcome differences.
{{Main|Intelligence and public policy}}
The ] of research on race and intelligence has long been a subject of debate: in a 1996 report of the ];{{sfn|Neisser|Boodoo|Bouchard|Boykin|1996}} in guidelines proposed by Gray and Thompson and by Hunt and Carlson;<ref name="Hunt & Carlson 2007"/><ref>{{harvnb|Gray|Thompson|2004}}</ref> and in two editorials in ] in 2009 by ] and by ] and ].<ref name="Ceci & Williams 2009">{{harvnb|Ceci|Williams|2009}}</ref><ref name="Rose 2009">{{Cite journal |last=Rose |first=Steven |date=2009 |title=Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit |url=https://rdcu.be/dj5uC |journal=Nature |volume=457 |issue=7231 |pages=786–788 |doi=10.1038/457786a |pmid=19212384 |bibcode=2009Natur.457..786R |s2cid=42846614 |url-access=limited}}</ref>


] maintains that the history of ] makes this field of research difficult to reconcile with current ethical standards for science.<ref name="Rose 2009"/>
The appearance of a large practical importance for intelligence makes some scholars claim that the source and meaning of the IQ gap is a pressing social concern. The IQ gap is reflected by gaps in the academic, economic, and social factors correlated with IQ<ref>{{AYref|Gordon|1997}}; {{AYref|Gottfredson|1997b}}</ref>. However, some dispute the general importance of the role of IQ for real-world outcomes, especially for differences in accumulated ] and general ] in a nation. See "]".
On the other hand, ] has argued that had there been a ban on research on possibly poorly conceived ideas, much valuable research on intelligence testing (including his own discovery of the ]) would not have occurred.<ref>{{harvnb|Flynn|2009b}}</ref>


Many have argued for increased interventions in order to close the gaps.<ref name="Brookings">{{cite web |last1=Jencks |first1=Christopher |last2=Phillips |first2=Meredith |title=The Black-White Test Score Gap |url=https://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html |website=New York Times |access-date=2 October 2016 |archive-date=8 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161008015238/https://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Flynn writes that "America will have to address all the aspects of black experience that are disadvantageous, beginning with the regeneration of inner city neighborhoods and their schools."<ref name="Flynn 2008">{{harvnb|Flynn|2008}}</ref> Especially in developing nations, society has been urged to take on the prevention of cognitive impairment in children as a high priority. Possible preventable causes include ], ] such as ], ], cerebral ], ] ] and ], newborn ], ], head injuries, ] and ].<ref name="Olness 2003">{{harvnb|Olness|2003}}</ref>
Two statistical effects interact to exacerbate group IQ differences. First, there seem to be minimum statistical thresholds of IQ for many socially valued outcomes (for example, high school graduation and college admission). Second, because of the shape of the ], only about 16% of the population is at least one standard deviation above the mean. Thus, although the IQ distributions for Blacks and Whites are largely overlapping, different IQ thresholds can have a significant impact on the proportion of Blacks and Whites above and below a particular cut-off.


==See also==
{| border="2" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;"
* ]
|+ '''Approximate IQ Distributions & Significance in the United States'''
* ]
|- bgcolor=#ccccff
* ]
!IQ range
* ]
!Whites
* ]
!Blacks
!Black:White ratio
!Training prospects
!High school dropout
!Lives in poverty
!"Middle-Class Values" index<ref name="MCV-index">The criteria for the "Middle-Class Values" index were: (for men) obtained high school degree (or more), were in labor force (but could be unemployed) throughout previous year (1989), never incarcerated, were still married to their first wife; (for women) obtained a high school degree, had never given birth out of wedlock, never incarcerated, were still marreid to their first husband. Individuals unable to work and those still in school were excluded from this analysis, as well as never-married individuals who satisfied all the other criteria. Poverty is not a criterion, nor is having children.</ref>
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| <75 || 3.6% || 18.0% || ~5:1 || simple, supervised work; eligible for government assistance || 55% || 30% || 16%
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| 75-90 || 18.3% || 41.4% || ~2:1 || very explicit hands on training; IQ >80 for military training; no government assistance || 35% || 16% || 30%
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| 90-100 || 24.3% || 24.9% || ~1:1 || mastery learning, hands on || rowspan=2 | 6% || rowspan=2 | 6% || rowspan=2 | 50%
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| 100-110 || 25.9% || 11.9% || ~1:2 || written material plus experience
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| 110-125 || 22.5% || 3.6% || ~1:6 || college format || 0.4% || 3% || 67%
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| >125 || 5.4% || 0.2% || ~1:32 || independent, self-teaching || 0% || 2% || 74%
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| colspan="8" | Based on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IQs for Whites (mean = 101.4, SD = 14.7) and for Blacks (mean = 86.9, SD = 13.0) from (Reynolds, Chastain, Kaufman, & McLean, 1987, p. 330). Training prospects from Wonderlic (1992). Significance data is from Herrnstein & Murray (1994), and is based on Whites only. Results from the total population are nearly indistinguishable. Results for Blacks only are similar but not identical (see the table below for comparisons between groups). Note that these are merely ]s. For example, poverty could be both a cause and consequence of low IQ.
|}


== References ==
Small differences in IQ, while relatively unimportant at the level of an individual, would theoretically have large effects at a population level. {{A(Y)ref|Herrnstein and Murray|1994}} calculate that a 3-point drop in average IQ would have little effect on factors like marriage, divorce, or unemployment. However, the drop from IQ 100 to 97 would increase poverty rates by 11 percent and the proportion of children living in poverty by 13 percent. All else being equal, similar rises would occur in rates of children born to single mothers, men in jail, high school drop-out, and men prevented from working due to health-related problems. In contrast, if average IQ were to increase 3-points to 103, poverty rates would fall 25 percent, children living in poverty would fall 20 percent, and high school drop-out rates would fall 28 percent.


=== Notes ===
{| border="2" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #ccccff; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;" ALIGN="right"
{{notelist}}
|+ '''Percentages of Blacks, Whites, and Latinos (Statistically Matched for IQ) in Educational and Social Outcomes'''
|- bgcolor=#ccccff
!Condition (matching IQ)
!Blacks
!Whites
!Latinos
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| High school graduation (103) || 93 || 89 || 91
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| College graduation (114) || 68 || 50 || 49
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| High-level occupation (117) || 26 || 10 || 16
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| Living in poverty (100) || 11 || 6 || 9
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| Unemployed for 1 month or more (100) || 15 || 11 || 11
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| Married by age 30 (100) || 58 || 79 || 75
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| Unwed mother with children (100) || 51 || 10 || 17
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| Has ever been on welfare (100) || 30 || 12 || 15
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| Mothers in poverty receiving welfare (100) || 74|| 56 || 54
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| Having a low birth-weight baby (100) || 6 || 3 || 5
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| Average annual wage (100) || $25,001 || $25,546 || $25,159
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| Men ever incarcerated (100) || 5 || 2 || 3
|- bgcolor=E9E8FF
| "Middle-Class Values" index<ref name="MCV-index"/> (100) || 32 || 48 || 45
|- bgcolor=#DFE0FF
| colspan="4" | from Herrnstein & Murray (1994), Chapter 14.
|}
Studies from '']'' and elsewhere indicate that controlling for IQ narrows, eliminates, or even reverses the Black-White gap in social and economic factors associated with IQ. After controlling for IQ, the probability of having a college degree or working in a high-IQ occupation is higher for Blacks than Whites. Controlling for IQ shrinks the income gap from thousands to a few hundred dollars. Controlling for IQ cuts differential poverty by about three-quarters and unemployment differences by half. However, controlling for IQ has little effect on differential marriage rates. For many other factors, controlling for IQ eliminates the differences between Whites and Hispanics, but the Black-White gap remains (albeit smaller).


=== Citations ===
Another study found that wealth, race and schooling are important to the inheritance of economic status, but IQ is not a major contributor and the genetic transmission of IQ is even less important.<ref>{{AYref|Bowles and Gintis|2002}}. Note that race, schooling and IQ are all correlated, so considering them as separate factors lessens the apparent effect of IQ.</ref>
{{Reflist}}


=== Bibliography ===
Whites are not a homogeneous group regarding real-world outcomes. For example, in the U.S. 33.6% of persons with self-reported Scottish ancestry completed college, while only 16.7% of persons with self-reported French-Canadian ancestry have done so.<ref>these values were taken from {{AYref|Kangas|1999}}, which reprints U.S. Census data which was originally reported by {{AYref|Hacker|1995}}, p. 105. {{AYref|Drummond|2005}} challenges the factual accuracy of other reporting by {{AYref|Kangas|1999}}.</ref>
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
*{{Cite book |last=Alland |first=Alexander Jr |url=https://archive.org/details/raceinmindraceiq00alla |title=Race in Mind |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2002 |pages= |isbn=978-0-312-23838-4 |url-access=registration }}
*{{Cite web |url=http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/race.htm |title=American Anthropological Association Statement on 'Race' and Intelligence |date=December 1994 |publisher=American Anthropological Association |ref={{harvid|AAA|1994}} |access-date=2005-03-24 |archive-date=2005-03-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050305114339/http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/race.htm |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite web |url=http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm |title=American Anthropological Association Statement on 'Race' |date=17 May 1998 |publisher=American Anthropological Association |ref={{harvid|AAA|1998}} |access-date=24 February 2011 |archive-date=27 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130627184228/http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |year=1996 |title=AAPA Statement on Biological Aspects of Race |url=http://www.physanth.org/association/position-statements/biological-aspects-of-race/?searchterm=race |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |volume=101 |issue=4 |pages=569–570 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.1331010408 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928030510/http://www.physanth.org/association/position-statements/biological-aspects-of-race/?searchterm=race |archive-date=2011-09-28 |access-date=2011-05-24 |ref={{harvid|AAPA|1996}} }}
*{{Cite book |last1=Aronson |first1=E |title=Social Psychology |last2=Wilson |first2=TD |last3=Akert |first3=AM |publisher=Prentice Hall |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-13-178686-8 |edition=5th |location=Upper Saddle River, NJ}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Behrman |first1=JR |last2=Alderman |first2=H |last3=Hoddinott |first3=J |year=2004 |title=Hunger and Malnutrition |url=http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Files/Filer/CC/Papers/sammendrag/Accepted__Hunger_summary_070504.pdf |journal=Copenhagen Consensus |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061025122932/http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Files/Filer/CC/Papers/sammendrag/Accepted__Hunger_summary_070504.pdf |archive-date=2006-10-25 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Bellinger |first1=David C |last2=Stiles |first2=Karen M |last3=Needleman |first3=Herbert L |date=December 1992 |title=Low-Level Lead Exposure, Intelligence and Academic Achievement: A Long-term Follow-up Study |url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/90/6/855 |journal=Pediatrics |volume=90 |issue=6 |pages=855–61 |doi=10.1542/peds.90.6.855 |pmid=1437425 |s2cid=25746146 |author-link1=David Bellinger |author-link3=Herbert Needleman |access-date=2009-12-19 |archive-date=2019-01-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190104021959/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/90/6/855?sso=1&sso_redirect_count=1&nfstatus=401&nftoken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000&nfstatusdescription=ERROR%3A+No+local+token |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Berlet |first=Chip |date=Summer 2003 |title=Into the Mainstream |url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=50 |journal=Intelligence Report |issue=110 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100202152214/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=50 |archive-date=2 February 2010 |access-date=21 February 2012 |df=dmy-all |author-link=Chip Berlet }}
*{{Cite book |last=Block |first=Ned |title=Race and Intelligence: Separating Science from Myth |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates |year=2002 |editor-last=Fish |editor-first=Jefferson |chapter=How heritability misleads about race}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Borsboom |first=Denny |date=September 2006 |title=The attack of the psychometricians |journal=Psychometrika |volume=71 |issue=3 |pages=425–40 |doi=10.1007/s11336-006-1447-6 |pmc=2779444 |pmid=19946599}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Brace |first=C Loring |year=1999 |title=An Anthropological Perspective on 'Race' and Intelligence: The non-clinal nature of human cognitive capabilities |journal=Journal of Anthropological Research |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=245–64 |doi=10.1086/jar.55.2.3631210 |jstor=3631210 |s2cid=83112950 |author-link=C. Loring Brace}}
*{{Cite book |last=Brace |first=C. Loring |title=Race is a four letter word |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-19-517351-2 |page=326}}
*{{Cite encyclopedia |year=2012 |title=race |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica Inc |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/488030/race |edition=Online |ref={{harvid|Britannica|2012}} |access-date=2011-02-24 |archive-date=2011-06-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629075541/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/488030/race |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Brown |first1=Robert T |last2=Reynolds |first2=Cecil R |last3=Whitaker |first3=Jean S |year=1999 |title=Bias in Mental Testing since "Bias in Mental Testing" |journal=School Psychology Quarterly |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=208–38 |doi=10.1037/h0089007|s2cid=46561407 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Bryc |first1=Katarzyna |last2=Auton |first2=Adam |last3=Nelson |first3=Matthew R. |last4=Oksenberg |first4=Jorge R. |last5=Hauser |first5=Stephen L. |last6=Williams |first6=Scott |last7=Froment |first7=Alain |last8=Bodo |first8=Jean-Marie |last9=Wambebe |first9=Charles |last10=Tishkoff |first10=Sarah A. |last11=Bustamante |first11=Carlos D. |year=2009 |title=Genome-wide patterns of population structure and admixture in West Africans and African Americans |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |volume=107 |issue=2 |pages=786–91 |bibcode=2010PNAS..107..786B |doi=10.1073/pnas.0909559107 |pmc=2818934 |pmid=20080753 |ref={{harvid|Bryc et al.|2009}} |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Campbell |first1=FA |last2=Ramey |first2=CT |year=1994 |title=Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families |journal=Child Development |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=684–698 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00777.x}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Campbell |first1=Frances A |last2=Ramey |first2=Craig T |last3=Pungello |first3=Elizabeth |last4=Sparling |first4=Joseph |last5=Miller-Johnson |first5=Shari |year=2002 |title=Early Childhood Education: Young Adult Outcomes From the Abecedarian Project |journal=Applied Developmental Science |volume=6 |pages=42–57 |doi=10.1207/s1532480xads0601_05 |s2cid=71602425 |ref={{harvid|Campbell et al.|2002}}}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Carson |first1=Michael |title='Race', IQ and Genes |last2=Beckwith |first2=Jon |date=2001 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |isbn=978-0-470-01590-2 |pages=1–5 |language=en |doi=10.1002/9780470015902.a0005689.pub3}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ceci |first1=SJ |last2=Williams |first2=WM |year=2009 |title=Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? Yes: the scientific truth must be pursued |journal=Nature |volume=457 |issue=7231 |pages=788–9 |bibcode=2009Natur.457..788C |doi=10.1038/457788a |pmid=19212385 |s2cid=205044224 |author-link1=Stephen J. Ceci |author-link2=Wendy M. Williams |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Cooper |first=R. S. |year=2005 |title=Race and IQ: Molecular Genetics as Deus ex Machina |journal=American Psychologist |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=71–76 |citeseerx=10.1.1.624.5059 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.71 |pmid=15641923}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Cottrell |first1=Jonathan M. |last2=Newman |first2=Daniel A. |last3=Roisman |first3=Glenn I. |date=November 2015 |title=Explaining the black-white gap in cognitive test scores: Toward a theory of adverse impact |journal=The Journal of Applied Psychology |volume=100 |issue=6 |pages=1713–1736 |doi=10.1037/apl0000020 |issn=1939-1854 |pmid=25867168}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Cronshaw |first1=Steven F |last2=Hamilton |first2=Leah K |last3=Onyura |first3=Betty R |last4=Winston |first4=Andrew S |date=September 2006 |title=Case for Non-Biased Intelligence Testing Against Black Africans Has Not Been Made: A Comment on Rushton, Skuy, and Bons |journal=International Journal of Selection and Assessment |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=278–287 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00346.x |s2cid=91179275 |ref={{harvid|Cronshaw et al.|2006}}}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Daley |first1=C. E. |title=The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence |last2=Onwuegbuzie |first2=A. J. |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-521-51806-2 |editor-last=Sternberg |editor-first=R. |location=Cambridge New York |pages=293–306 |chapter=Race and Intelligence |editor-last2=Kaufman |editor-first2=S. B.}}
*{{Cite book |last=Deary |first=Ian J |title=Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-19-289321-5}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Deary |first1=I. J. |last2=Penke |first2=L. |last3=Johnson |first3=W. |year=2010 |title=The neuroscience of human intelligence differences |url=https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8895819/the_neuroscience_of_human_intelligence.pdf |journal=Nature Reviews Neuroscience |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=201–211 |doi=10.1038/nrn2793 |pmid=20145623 |s2cid=5136934 |hdl=20.500.11820/9b11fac3-47d0-424c-9d1c-fe6f9ff2ecac |hdl-access=free |access-date=2019-01-26 |archive-date=2018-07-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180719195613/https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8895819/the_neuroscience_of_human_intelligence.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Deary |first1=IJ |last2=Johnson |first2=W |last3=Houlihan |first3=LM |year=2009 |title=Genetic foundations of human intelligence |url=https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8895353/genetic_foundations_of_human_intelligence.pdf |journal=Human Genetics |volume=126 |issue=1 |pages=215–32 |doi=10.1007/s00439-009-0655-4 |pmid=19294424 |hdl=20.500.11820/c3e0a75b-dad6-4860-91c6-b242221af681 |s2cid=4975607 |hdl-access=free |access-date=2019-12-07 |archive-date=2020-08-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801215610/https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8895353/genetic_foundations_of_human_intelligence.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Dickens |first1=William T |last2=Flynn |first2=James R |year=2001 |title=Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved |journal=Psychological Review |volume=108 |issue=2 |pages=346–69 |citeseerx=10.1.1.139.2436 |doi=10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.346 |pmid=11381833 |author-link1=William T. Dickens}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Dickens |first1=William T |last2=Flynn |first2=James R |year=2006 |title=Black Americans Reduce the Racial IQ Gap: Evidence from Standardization Samples |url=http://www.brookings.edu/views/papers/dickens/20060619_iq.pdf |journal=Psychological Science |volume=17 |issue=10 |pages=913–20 |citeseerx=10.1.1.186.2540 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01802.x |pmid=17100793 |s2cid=6593169 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091009095003/http://www.brookings.edu/views/papers/dickens/20060619_IQ.pdf |archive-date=2009-10-09 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Elhoweris |first1=Hala |last2=Mutua |first2=Kagendo |last3=Alsheikh |first3=Negmeldin |last4=Holloway |first4=Pauline |year=2005 |title=Effect of Children's Ethnicity on Teachers' Referral and Recommendation Decisions in Gifted and Talented Programs |journal=Remedial and Special Education |volume=26 |pages=25–31 |doi=10.1177/07419325050260010401 |s2cid=146321193 |ref={{harvid|Elhoweris et al.|2005}}}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Eppig |first=Christopher |year=2011 |title=Why Is Average IQ Higher in Some Places? |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-is-average-iq-higher-in-some-places |journal=Scientific American |access-date=2011-11-20 |archive-date=2020-04-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200401001619/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-is-average-iq-higher-in-some-places/ |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite book |last=Evans |first=Gavin |title=Skin Deep: Journeys in the Divisive Science of Race |date=2019 |isbn=978-1-78607-622-9 |location=London |oclc=1059232398 |publisher=]}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Eyferth |first=K |year=1961 |title=Leistungern verscheidener Gruppen von Besatzungskindern Hamburg-Wechsler Intelligenztest für Kinder (HAWIK) |journal=Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie |language=de |volume=113 |pages=222–41}}
*{{Cite book |last=Eysenck |first=Hans J |title=Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy |publisher=Falmer |year=1987 |editor-last=Modgil |editor-first=S |location=New York, NY |chapter=Intelligence and Reaction Time: The Contribution of Arthur Jensen |editor-last2=Modgil |editor-first2=C |author-link=Hans Eysenck}}
*{{Cite book |last=Falk |first=Avner |title=Anti-semitism: a history and psychoanalysis of contemporary hatred |publisher=Praeger |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-313-35385-7 |page=312}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Flynn |first=James R |year=1991 |title=Reaction times show that both Chinese and British children are more intelligent than one another |journal=Perceptual and Motor Skills |volume=72 |issue=2 |pages=544–6 |doi=10.2466/pms.1991.72.2.544 |s2cid=144091744 |author-link=James Flynn (academic)}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Flynn |first=James R |date=3 September 2008 |title=Perspectives: Still a question of black vs white? |url=http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2008/09/james-flynn-in-the-new-scientist/ |journal=New Scientist |edition=magazine issue |issue=2672 |doi=10.1016/S0262-4079(08)62253-8 |volume=199 |pages=48–50 |access-date=6 February 2011 |archive-date=7 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707111349/http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2008/09/james-flynn-in-the-new-scientist/ |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Flynn |first=James R |year=2009b |title=Would you wish the research undone? |journal=Nature |volume=458 |issue=7235 |page=146 |bibcode=2009Natur.458..146F |doi=10.1038/458146a |pmid=19279612 |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Flynn |first=James R |year=2010 |title=The spectacles through which I see the race and IQ debate |url=http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/flynn2010a.pdf |journal=Intelligence |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=363–6 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.001 |access-date=2011-02-18 |archive-date=2020-12-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201207224050/http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/flynn2010a.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite book |last=Flynn |first=James R. |title=Are We Getting Smarter? Rising IQ in the Twenty-First Century |publisher=] |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-107-60917-4 |location=Cambridge |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/arewegettingsmar0000flyn }}
**{{lay source |template=cite periodical |author=Lea Winerman |date=March 2013 |title=Smarter than ever? |volume=44 |issue=3 |url=http://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/03/smarter.aspx |periodical=Monitor on Psychology}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Gottfredson |first=Linda S |year=1997 |title=Mainstream Science on Intelligence (editorial) |url=http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf |journal=Intelligence |volume=24 |pages=13–23 |doi=10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8 |author-link=Linda Gottfredson |access-date=2005-01-08 |archive-date=2014-12-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141222052006/http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Gottfredson |first=Linda S |year=2007 |title=Applying Double Standards to 'Divisive' Ideas: Commentary on Hunt and Carlson |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=216–220 |doi=10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00039.x |pmid=26151962 |s2cid=21203607}}
*{{Cite book |last=Gould |first=Stephen Jay |url=https://archive.org/details/mismeasureofman00goulrich |title=The Mismeasure of Man |publisher=Norton |year=1981 |isbn=978-0-393-30056-7 |location=New York, London |url-access=registration |author-link=Stephen Jay Gould }}
*{{Cite book |last=Graves |first=Joseph L. |url=https://archive.org/details/emperorsnewcloth00grav |title=The Emperor's New Clothes: Biological Theories of Race at the Millennium |publisher=Rutgers University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-8135-2847-2 |edition=Kindle |url-access=registration |author-link=Joseph L. Graves Jr. }}
*{{Cite book |last=Graves |first=Joseph L |title=Race and Intelligence: Separating Myth from Reality |publisher=Laurence Erlbaum Associates |year=2002a |isbn=978-0-8058-3757-5 |editor-last=Fish |editor-first=Jefferson M |pages=57–94 |chapter=The Misuse of Life History Theory: JP Rushton and the Pseudoscience of Racial Hierarchy}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Graves |first=Joseph L Jr |year=2002b |title=What a tangled web he weaves: Race, reproductive strategies and Rushton's life history theory |journal=Anthropological Theory |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=131–54 |doi=10.1177/1469962002002002627 |s2cid=144377864}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Gray |first1=Jeremy R |last2=Thompson |first2=Paul M |year=2004 |title=Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics |url=https://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Gray_%26_Thompson_2004_Nature_Rev_Neurosci_5%2C471-482.pdf |journal=Nature Reviews Neuroscience |volume=5 |issue=6 |pages=471–82 |doi=10.1038/nrn1405 |pmid=15152197 |s2cid=2430677 |access-date=2019-05-10 |archive-date=2018-07-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180714065640/http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Gray_%26_Thompson_2004_Nature_Rev_Neurosci_5%2C471-482.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite book |last1=Grossman |first1=James B |title=The evolution of intelligence |last2=Kaufman |publisher=Routledge |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-8058-3267-9 |editor-last=Sternberg |editor-first=Robert J |chapter=Evolutionary Psychology: Promise and Perils |editor-last2=Kaufman |editor-first2=James C}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Hampshire |first1=A. |last2=Highfield |first2=R. R. |last3=Parkin |first3=B. L. |last4=Owen |first4=A. M. |year=2012 |title=Fractionating human intelligence |journal=Neuron |volume=76 |pages=1225–1237 |doi=10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.022 |pmid=23259956 |number=6 |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Herrnstein |first1=Richard J |url=https://archive.org/details/bellcurveintelli00herr |title=The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life |last2=Murray |first2=Charles |publisher=Free Press |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-02-914673-6 |location=New York |url-access=registration |author-link1=Richard Herrnstein |author-link2=Charles Murray (political scientist) }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ho |first1=KC |last2=Roessmann |first2=U |last3=Straumfjord |first3=JV |last4=Monroe |first4=G |date=December 1980 |title=Analysis of brain weight. I. Adult brain weight in relation to sex, race, and age. |journal=Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine |volume=104 |issue=12 |pages=635–9 |pmid=6893659 |ref={{harvid|Ho et al.|1980}}}}
*{{Cite book |last=Hunt |first=Earl |title=Human Intelligence |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-521-70781-7 |author-link=Earl B. Hunt}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Hunt |first1=Earl |last2=Carlson |first2=Jerry |year=2007 |title=Considerations relating to the study of group differences in intelligence |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=194–213 |doi=10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00037.x |pmid=26151960 |s2cid=32540018}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Hunt |first1=Earl |last2=Wittmann |first2=Werner |date=January–February 2008 |title=National intelligence and national prosperity |journal=Intelligence |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=1–9 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2006.11.002}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Irvine |first=SH |year=1983 |title=Where intelligence tests fail |journal=Nature |volume=302 |issue=5907 |page=371 |bibcode=1983Natur.302..371I |doi=10.1038/302371b0 |s2cid=41604729 |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/humanabilitiesin0000unse |title=Human Abilities in Cultural Context |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1988 |isbn=978-0-521-34482-1 |editor-last=Irvine |editor-first=SH |editor-last2=Berry |editor-first2=JW }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ivanovic |first1=Daniza M. |last2=Leiva |first2=Boris P. |last3=Pérez |first3=Hernán T. |last4=Olivares |first4=Manuel G. |last5=Dı́az |first5=Nora S. |last6=Urruti |first6=Marı́a Soledad C. |last7=Almagià |first7=Atilio F. |last8=Toro |first8=Triana D. |last9=Miller |first9=Patricio T. |last10=Bosch |first10=Enrique O. |last11=Larraı́n |first11=Cristián G. |year=2004 |title=Head size and intelligence, learning, nutritional status and brain development. Head, IQ, learning, nutrition and brain |journal=Neuropsychologia |volume=42 |issue=8 |pages=1118–31 |doi=10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.022 |pmid=15093150 |s2cid=2114185 |ref={{harvid|Ivanovic et al.|2004}}}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Jackson |first1=John P. |title=Race, Racism, and Science: Social Impact and Interaction |last2=Weidman |first2=Nadine M. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2004 |page=23}}
*{{Cite book |last=Jackson |first=John P. |title=Science for Segregation: Race, Law, and the Case against Brown v. Board of Education |publisher=] |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-8147-4271-6}}
**{{lay source |template=cite web |title=Book Review: Science for Segregation: Race, Law, and the Case Against Brown v. Board of Education |url=http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/25.2/br_19.html |website=History Cooperative}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Jensen |first=Arthur R |year=1969 |title=How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? |journal=Harvard Educational Review |volume=39 |pages=1–123 |doi=10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 |title-link=How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? |author-link=Arthur Jensen}}
*{{Cite book |last=Jensen |first=Arthur R |title=Educability and Group Differences |publisher=Methuen |year=1973 |isbn=978-0-06-012194-5 |location=London |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/educabilitygroup0000jens }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Jensen |first1=Arthur R |last2=Whang |first2=PA |year=1993 |title=Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Chinese-American and Anglo-American children |journal=Journal of Biosocial Science |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=397–410 |doi=10.1017/s0021932000020721 |pmid=8360233|s2cid=18171436 }}
*{{Cite book |last=Jensen |first=Arthur R |url=https://archive.org/details/gfactorscienc00jens |title=The g factor: The science of mental ability |publisher=Praeger |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-275-96103-9 |location=Westport, CT }}
*{{Cite book |last=Jensen |first=AR |title=Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences |publisher=Elsevier |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-08-044939-5 |location=Amsterdam}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Jensen |first1=Arthur R |last2=Johnson |first2=Fred W |date=May–June 1994 |title=Race and sex differences in head size and IQ |journal=Intelligence |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=309–33 |doi=10.1016/0160-2896(94)90032-9}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Kamin |first=Leon J. |date=March 2006 |title=African IQ and Mental Retardation |journal=South African Journal of Psychology |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=1–9 |doi=10.1177/008124630603600101 |s2cid=92984213 |author-link=Leon Kamin}}
*{{Cite encyclopedia |last=Kaplan |first=Jonathan Michael |url=http://www.els.net/WileyCDA/ElsArticle/refId-a0005857.html |title='Race': What Biology Can Tell Us about a Social Construct |date=January 2011 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Life Sciences |isbn=978-0-470-01617-6 |doi=10.1002/9780470015902.a0005857 |access-date=2012-02-22 |archive-date=2021-05-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210525023933/http://www.els.net/WileyCDA/ElsArticle/refId-a0005857.html |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Kaplan |first=Jonathan Michael |date=6 February 2014 |title=Race, IQ, and the search for statistical signals associated with so-called "X"-factors: environments, racism, and the "hereditarian hypothesis" |journal=Biology & Philosophy |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.1007/s10539-014-9428-0 |s2cid=85351431}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Kaplan |first1=J. M. |last2=Winther |first2=R. G. |title=Prisoners of Abstraction? The Theory and Measure of Genetic Variation, and the Very Concept of 'Race' |journal=] |date=2013 |volume=7 |pages=401–412 |doi=10.1002/9780470015902.a0005857 |url=http://philpapers.org/archive/KAPPOA.14.pdf}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Kaszycka |first1=Katarzyna A. |last2=Štrkalj |first2=Goran |last3=Strzałko |first3=Jan |year=2009 |title=Current Views of European Anthropologists on Race: Influence of Educational and Ideological Background |journal=American Anthropologist |volume=111 |issue=1 |pages=43–56 |doi=10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Lieberman |first=Leonard |year=2001 |title=How "Caucasoids" got such big crania and why they shrank: from Morton to Rushton." |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=69–95 |doi=10.1086/318434 |pmid=14992214 |s2cid=224794908}}
*{{Cite book |last=Loehlin |first=John C |title=The Handbook of Intelligence |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |editor-last=Sternberg |editor-first=Robert J |location=Cambridge |chapter=Group Differences in Intelligence}}
*{{Cite book |last=Ludy |first=Benjamin T |title=Brief History of Modern Psychology |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-4051-3206-0 |pages=188–91}}
*{{Cite journal |last=MacEachern |first=Scott |date=March 2006 |title=Africanist archaeology and ancient IQ: racial science and cultural evolution in the twenty-first century |journal=World Archaeology |volume=38 |issue=1 |pages=72–92 |doi=10.1080/00438240500509918 |s2cid=162340124}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Mackenzie |first=Brian |date=1984 |title=Explaining race differences in IQ: The logic, the methodology, and the evidence. |journal=American Psychologist |language=en |volume=39 |issue=11 |pages=1214–1233 |doi=10.1037/0003-066x.39.11.1214}}
*{{Cite book |last=Mackintosh |first=N. J. |url=https://archive.org/details/iqhumanintellige00mack |url-access=registration |title=IQ and Human Intelligence |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-19-852367-3 |author-link=Nicholas Mackintosh }}
*{{Cite book |last=Mackintosh |first=N. J. |title=IQ and Human Intelligence |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-19-958559-5 |edition=second |location=Oxford}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Manly |first1=JJ |last2=Byrd |first2=DA |last3=Touradji |first3=P |last4=Stern |first4=Yaakov |year=2004 |title=Acculturation, Reading Level, and Neuropsychological Test Performance Among African American Elders |journal=Applied Neuropsychology |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=37–46 |doi=10.1207/s15324826an1101_5 |pmid=15471745 |s2cid=30490056 |ref={{harvid|Manly et al.|2004}}}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Manly |first1=Jennifer J |last2=Jacobs |first2=Diane M |last3=Touradji |first3=Pegah |last4=Small |first4=Scott A |last5=Stern |first5=Yaakov |year=2002 |title=Reading level attenuates differences in neuropsychological test performance between African American and White elders |journal=Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=341–348 |doi=10.1017/S1355617702813157 |pmid=11939693 |s2cid=14360177 |ref={{harvid|Manly et al.|2002}}}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Maltby |first1=John |title=Personality, Individual Differences and Intelligence |last2=Day |first2=Liz |last3=Macaskill |first3=Ann |publisher=] |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-13-129760-9 |pages=334–47}}
*{{Cite journal |last=McDaniel |first=M. A. |year=2005 |title=Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence |journal=Intelligence |volume=33 |issue=4 |pages=337–346 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2004.11.005}}
*<!--not peer reviewed-->{{Cite journal |last=Mickelson |first=Roslyn Arlin |year=2003 |title=When Are Racial Disparities in Education the Result of Racial Discrimination? A Social Science Perspective |journal=Teachers College Record |volume=105 |issue=6 |pages=1052–1086 |doi=10.1111/1467-9620.00277}}
*{{Cite book |last=Miele |first=Frank |title=Intelligence, Race and Genetics: Conversations with Arthur R. Jensen |publisher=Basic Books |year=2002 |page=256 |author-link=Frank Miele}}
*{{Cite journal |last=MMWR |date=27 May 2005 |title=Blood Lead Levels—United States, 1999–2002 |url=https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5420a5.htm |journal=Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report |volume=54 |issue=20 |pages=513–6 |pmid=15917736 |access-date=10 September 2017 |archive-date=5 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105232114/https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5420a5.htm |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Moore |first=Elsie G |date=May 1986 |title=Family socialization and the IQ test performance of traditionally and transracially adopted Black children |journal=Developmental Psychology |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=317–26 |doi=10.1037/0012-1649.22.3.317}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Moore |first1=David S. |last2=Shenk |first2=David |date=2016-12-01 |title=The heritability fallacy |journal=Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science |language=en |volume=8 |issue=1–2 |pages=e1400 |doi=10.1002/wcs.1400 |issn=1939-5078 |pmid=27906501}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Murray |first=Charles |year=2006 |title=Changes over time in the black–white difference on mental tests: Evidence from the children of the 1979 cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth |journal=Intelligence |volume=34 |issue=6 |pages=527–540 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.004 |author-link=Charles Murray (political scientist)}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Murray |first=Charles |date=July–August 2007 |title=The magnitude and components of change in the black–white IQ difference from 1920 to 1991: A birth cohort analysis of the Woodcock–Johnson standardizations |journal=Intelligence |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=305–18 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.001}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Neisser |first=Ulric |year=2004 |title=Serious Scientists or Disgusting Racists? |journal=Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books |volume=49 |issue=1 |pages=5–7 |doi=10.1037/004224 |author-link=Ulric Neisser}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Neisser |first1=Ulric |last2=Boodoo |first2=Gwyneth |last3=Bouchard |first3=Thomas J Jr |last4=Boykin |first4=A. Wade |last5=Brody |first5=Nathan |last6=Ceci |first6=Stephen J |last7=Halpern |first7=Diane F |last8=Loehlin |first8=John C |last9=Perloff |first9=Robert |last10=Sternberg |first10=Robert J |last11=Urbina |first11=Susana |year=1996 |title=Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns |url=http://matt.colorado.edu/teaching/highcog/fall8/nbbbbchlpsu96.pdf |journal=American Psychologist |volume=51 |issue=2 |pages=77–101 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77 |access-date=2014-08-23 |archive-date=2015-04-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150420144859/http://matt.colorado.edu/teaching/highcog/fall8/nbbbbchlpsu96.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite book |last=Nevid |first=Jeffrey S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dO8bCgAAQBAJ |title=Essentials of Psychology: Concepts and Applications |date=2014-01-17 |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1-285-75122-1 |language=en |access-date=2018-01-30 |archive-date=2023-03-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230320043711/https://books.google.com/books?id=dO8bCgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Nisbett |first=Richard |year=2005 |title=Heredity, environment, and race differences in IQ: A commentary on Rushton and Jensen |url=http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Nisbett-commentary-on-30years.pdf |journal=Psychology, Public Policy, and Law |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=302–10 |doi=10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.302 |author-link=Richard E. Nisbett |access-date=2010-04-08 |archive-date=2011-06-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605054810/http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Nisbett-commentary-on-30years.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite book |last=Nisbett |first=Richard |url=https://archive.org/details/intelligencehowt00nisb |title=Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-393-06505-3 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Nisbett |first1=Richard E. |last2=Aronson |first2=Joshua |last3=Blair |first3=Clancy |last4=Dickens |first4=William |last5=Flynn |first5=James |last6=Halpern |first6=Diane F. |last7=Turkheimer |first7=Eric |year=2012a |title=Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments |journal=American Psychologist |volume=67 |number=2 |pages=130–159 |issn=0003-066X |pmid=22233090 |doi=10.1037/a0026699}}
**{{lay source |template=cite web |date=2012-05-10 |title=The latest on intelligence |url=http://www.danielwillingham.com/1/post/2012/05/the-latest-on-intelligence.html |website=Daniel Willingham}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Nisbett |first1=Richard E. |last2=Aronson |first2=Joshua |last3=Blair |first3=Clancy |last4=Dickens |first4=William |last5=Flynn |first5=James |last6=Halpern |first6=Diane F. |last7=Turkheimer |first7=Eric |year=2012b |title=Group differences in IQ are best understood as environmental in origin |url=http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Articles%20for%20Online%20CV/Nisbett%20(2012)%20Group.pdf |journal=American Psychologist |volume=67 |pages=503–504 |doi=10.1037/a0029772 |issn=0003-066X |pmid=22963427 |access-date=22 July 2013 |number=6 |archive-date=23 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150123114230/http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Articles%20for%20Online%20CV/Nisbett%20(2012)%20Group.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite book |last1=Niu |first1=Weihua |title=The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence |last2=Brass |first2=Jillian |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-521-51806-2 |editor-last=Sternberg |editor-first=Robert J |chapter=Intelligence in Worldwide Perspective |editor-last2=Kaufmann |editor-first2=Scott Barry}}
*{{Cite book |last=Ogbu |first=John |title=Minority Education and Caste: The American System in Cross-Cultural Perspective |publisher=Academic Press |year=1978 |isbn=978-0-125-24250-9 |location=New York}}
*{{Cite book |last=Ogbu |first=John U |title=Cross-cultural roots of minority child development |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |year=1994 |editor-last=Greenfield |editor-first=PM |location=Hillsdale, NJ |pages= |chapter=From cultural differences to differences in cultural frames of reference |editor-last2=Cocking |editor-first2=RR |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/crossculturalroo00gree |chapter-url-access=registration }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Olness |first=K |date=April 2003 |title=Effects on brain development leading to cognitive impairment: a worldwide epidemic |journal=Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics |volume=24 |issue=2 |pages=120–30 |doi=10.1097/00004703-200304000-00009 |pmid=12692458 |s2cid=31999992}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Pickren |first1=Wade E |title=A History of Modern Psychology in Context |last2=Rutherford |first2=Alexandra |publisher=Wiley |year=2010 |author-link2=Alexandra Rutherford}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Plotnik |first1=Rod |title=Introduction to Psychology |last2=Kouyoumdjian |first2=Haig |publisher=Cengage Learning |year=2011 |chapter=Intelligence}}<!--<-See "Binet's Two Warnings"-->
*{{Cite journal |last1=Qian |first1=M |last2=Wang |first2=D |last3=Watkins |first3=WE |last4=Gebski |first4=V |last5=Yan |first5=YQ |last6=Li |first6=M |last7=Chen |first7=ZP |year=2005 |title=The effects of iodine on intelligence in children: a meta-analysis of studies conducted in China |journal=Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=32–42 |pmid=15734706 |ref={{harvid|Qian et al.|2005}}}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Reichman |first=Nancy E. |date=2005 |title=Low birth weight and school readiness |journal=The Future of Children |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=91–116 |doi=10.1353/foc.2005.0008 |issn=1054-8289 |pmid=16130543 |s2cid=23345980}}
*{{Cite encyclopedia |year=1988 |encyclopedia=Human Abilities in Cultural Context |publisher=Cambridge University Press |last=Reuning |first=Helmut |title=Testing Bushmen in the Central Kalahari |editor-last=Irvine |editor-first=SH |pages=453–486 |doi=10.1017/CBO9780511574603.018 |isbn=978-0-511-57460-3 |url=http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511574603&cid=CBO9780511574603A028 |editor2-last=Berry |editor2-first=JW |access-date=2010-04-26 |archive-date=2011-07-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725133144/http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511574603&cid=CBO9780511574603A028 |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Richardson |first=K |year=2004 |title=Book Review: IQ and the Wealth of Nations |journal=Heredity |volume=92 |issue=4 |pages=359–60 |doi=10.1038/sj.hdy.6800418 |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Rindermann |first1=Heiner |last2=Thompson |first2=James |date=November 2013 |title=Ability rise in NAEP and narrowing ethnic gaps? |journal=Intelligence |volume=41 |issue=6 |pages=821–831 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.016 |author-link1=Heiner Rindermann}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Rose |first=Steven |year=2009 |title=Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit |journal=Nature |volume=457 |issue=7231 |pages=786–8 |bibcode=2009Natur.457..786R |doi=10.1038/457786a |pmid=19212384 |s2cid=42846614}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Roth |first1=PL |last2=Bevier |first2=CA |last3=Bobko |first3=P |last4=Switzer |first4=FS III |last5=Tyler |first5=P |year=2001 |title=Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A metaanalysis |journal=Personnel Psychology |volume=54 |issue=2 |pages=297–330 |citeseerx=10.1.1.372.6092 |doi=10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00094.x |ref={{harvid|Roth et al.|2001}}}}
*{{Cite book |last=Rouvroy |first=Antoinette |title=Human genes and neoliberal governance: a Foucauldian critique |publisher=Routledge |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-415-44433-0 |page=86}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Rowe |first1=David C |date=January 2005 |editor-last=Rodgers |editor-first=Joseph |title=Under the Skin: On the Impartial Treatment of Genetic and Environmental Hypothesis of Racial Differences |journal=American Psychologist |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=60–70 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.60 |pmid=15641922}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Rushton |first1=J. Philippe |last2=Jensen |first2=Arthur R |year=2005 |title=Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability |url=http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf |journal=Psychology, Public Policy, and Law |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=246–8 |citeseerx=10.1.1.186.102 |doi=10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151103215722/http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf |archive-date=2015-11-03}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Saloojee |first1=Haroon |last2=Pettifor |first2=John M |date=December 2001 |title=Iron deficiency and impaired child development |journal=BMJ |volume=323 |issue=7326 |pages=1377–8 |doi=10.1136/bmj.323.7326.1377 |pmc=1121846 |pmid=11744547}}
*{{Cite book |last1=Scarr |first1=S. |title=Methods of family research: Biographies of research projects |last2=Weinberg |first2=R. A. |year=1990 |volume=1 |pages=121–151 |chapter=The nature-nurture problem revisited: The Minnesota adoption studies}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Scarr |first1=S. |last2=Weinberg |first2=R. A. |year=1976 |title=IQ test performance of black children adopted by White families |journal=American Psychologist |volume=31 |issue=10 |pages=726–739 |doi=10.1037/0003-066x.31.10.726 |s2cid=32410011 }}
*{{Cite book |last1=Schacter |first1=Daniel |title=Psychology |last2=Gilbert |first2=Daniel |last3=Wegner |first3=Daniel |publisher=Worth Publishing |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7167-5215-8 |location=New York |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha_e2x8 }}
*{{Cite book |last=James A. Banks |title=Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity and Society |publisher=SAGE |year=2008 |editor-last=Schaefer |editor-first=Richard T. |volume=2 |page=1091 |chapter=Race |ref={{harvid|Schaefer|2008}} |author-link=James A. Banks}}
*{{Cite book |last=Serpell |first=Robert |title=Handbook of Intelligence |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-521-59648-0 |editor-last=Sternberg |editor-first=Robert J. |pages=549–577 |chapter=Intelligence and Culture}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Sheppard |first1=Leah D. |last2=Vernon |first2=Philip A. |date=February 2008 |title=Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research |journal=Personality and Individual Differences |volume=44 |issue=3 |pages=535–551 |doi=10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.015}}
*{{Cite book |last=Shurkin |first=Joel |title=Broken Genius: The Rise and Fall of William Shockley, Creator of the Electronic Age |publisher=Macmillan |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-4039-8815-7 |location=London}}
**{{lay source |template=cite magazine |author=Brian Clegg |title=Review - Broken Genius - Joel Shurkin |url=http://www.popularscience.co.uk/reviews/rev291.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061006151557/http://www.popularscience.co.uk/reviews/rev291.htm |archive-date=2006-10-06 |magazine=Popular Science}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Shuttleworth-Edwards |first1=AB |last2=Kemp |first2=RD |last3=Rust |first3=AL |last4=Muirhead |first4=JG |last5=Hartman |first5=NP |last6=Radloff |first6=SE |date=October 2004 |title=Cross-cultural effects on IQ test performance: a review and preliminary normative indications on WAIS-III test performance |journal=Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology |volume=26 |issue=7 |pages=903–20 |doi=10.1080/13803390490510824 |pmid=15742541 |s2cid=16060622 |ref={{harvid|Shuttleworth-Edwards et al.|2004}}}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Smay |first1=Diana |last2=Armelagos |first2=George |date=July 2000 |title=Galileo Wept: A Critical Assessment of the Use of Race in Forensic Anthropology |journal=Transforming Anthropology |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=19–29 |doi=10.1525/tran.2000.9.2.19|s2cid=143942539 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Snyderman |first1=Mark |last2=Rothman |first2=Stanley |year=1987 |title=Survey of expert opinion on intelligence and aptitude testing |journal=American Psychologist |volume=42 |issue=2 |pages=137–44 |doi=10.1037/0003-066x.42.2.137}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Sternberg |first1=Robert J |last2=Grigorenko |first2=Elena L |last3=Kidd |first3=Kenneth K |year=2005 |title=Intelligence, Race, and Genetics |url=http://medicine.yale.edu/labs/kidd/440.pdf |journal=American Psychologist |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=46–59 |citeseerx=10.1.1.174.313 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.46 |pmid=15641921 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720180251/http://medicine.yale.edu/labs/kidd/440.pdf |archive-date=2011-07-20 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Sternberg |first1=R. J. |last2=Grigorenko |first2=E. L. |year=2007 |title=The Difficulty of Escaping Preconceptions in Writing an Article About the Difficulty of Escaping Preconceptions: Commentary on Hunt and Carlson (2007) |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=221–223 |doi=10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00040.x |pmid=26151963 |s2cid=21096328}}
*{{Cite book |last=Spiro |first=Jonathan P. |title=Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant |publisher=Univ. of Vermont Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-1-58465-715-6}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Suzuki |first1=Lisa |last2=Aronson |first2=Joshua |date=2005 |title=The cultural malleability of intelligence and its impact on the racial/ethnic hierarchy. |journal=Psychology, Public Policy, and Law |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=320–327 |citeseerx=10.1.1.1022.3693 |doi=10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.320}}
*<!--to identify citation in quotation in mainspace from Hunt & Carlson (2007)-->{{Cite journal |last1=Tang |first1=Hua |last2=Quertermous |first2=Tom |last3=Rodriguez |first3=Beatriz |last4=Kardia |first4=Sharon L.R. |last5=Zhu |first5=Xiaofeng |last6=Brown |first6=Andrew |last7=Pankow |first7=James S. |last8=Province |first8=Michael A. |last9=Hunt |first9=Steven C. |last10=Boerwinkle |first10=Eric |last11=Schork |first11=Nicholas J. |date=February 2005 |title=Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case-control association studies |journal=American Journal of Human Genetics |volume=76 |issue=2 |pages=268–75 |doi=10.1086/427888 |pmc=1196372 |pmid=15625622 |ref={{harvid|Tang et al.|2005}} |first12=Neil J. |last12=Risch}}
*{{Citation |last=Templeton |first=A. R. |title=Race and Intelligence Separating Science from Myth |date=2001 |pages=31–55 |editor-last=Fish |editor-first=J. M. |contribution=The Genetic and Evolutionary Significance of Human Races |place=London |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-8058-3757-5 |author-link=Alan R. Templeton}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Thompson |first1=Paul M. |last2=Cannon |first2=Tyrone D. |last3=Narr |first3=Katherine L. |last4=van Erp |first4=Theo |last5=Poutanen |first5=Veli-Pekka |last6=Huttunen |first6=Matti |last7=Lönnqvist |first7=Jouko |last8=Standertskjöld-Nordenstam |first8=Carl-Gustaf |last9=Kaprio |first9=Jaakko |last10=Khaledy |first10=Mohammad |last11=Dail |first11=Rajneesh |year=2001 |title=Genetic influences on brain structure |url=http://www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/MEDIA/NN/Nature_Neuro2001_genetics.pdf |journal=Nature Neuroscience |volume=4 |issue=12 |pages=1253–58 |doi=10.1038/nn758 |pmid=11694885 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515085921/http://www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/MEDIA/NN/Nature_Neuro2001_genetics.pdf |archive-date=2011-05-15 |ref={{harvid|Thompson et al.|2001}} |first12=Chris I. |last12=Zoumalan |first13=Arthur W. |last13=Toga |s2cid=7132470 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Tizard |first1=Barbara |last2=Cooperman |first2=Oliver |last3=Joseph |first3=Anne |last4=Tizard |first4=Jack |date=June 1972 |title=Environmental effects on language development: A study of young children in long-stay residential nurseries |journal=Child Development |volume=43 |issue=2 |pages=337–58 |doi=10.2307/1127540 |jstor=1127540 |ref={{harvid|Tizard et al.|1972}}}}
*{{Cite book |last=Tucker |first=William H |title=The Funding of Scientific Racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer Fund |publisher=University of Illinois Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-252-02762-8 |author-link=William H. Tucker (psychologist)}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Verney |first1=Steven P. |last2=Granholm |first2=Eric |last3=Marshall |first3=Sandra P. |last4=Malcarne |first4=Vanessa L. |last5=Saccuzzo |first5=Dennis P. |date=26 July 2016 |title=Culture-Fair Cognitive Ability Assessment |journal=Assessment |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=303–319 |doi=10.1177/1073191105276674 |pmid=16123251 |s2cid=31024437 |ref={{harvid|Verney et al.|2005}}}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Vincent |first=Ken R. |date=March 1991 |title=Black/white IQ differences: Does age make the difference? |journal=Journal of Clinical Psychology |volume=47 |issue=2 |pages=266–270 |doi=10.1002/1097-4679(199103)47:2<266::aid-jclp2270470213>3.0.co;2-s |pmid=2030133}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Weinberg |first1=Richard A. |last2=Scarr |first2=Sandra |last3=Waldman |first3=Irwin D. |year=1992 |title=The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study: A Follow-Up of IQ Test Performance at Adolescence |journal=Intelligence |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=117–35 |doi=10.1016/0160-2896(92)90028-P}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Wicherts |first1=Jelte M |last2=Borsboom |first2=Denny |last3=Dolan |first3=Conor V |year=2010 |title=Why national IQs do not support evolutionary theories of intelligence |journal=Personality and Individual Differences |volume=48 |issue=2 |pages=91–6 |doi=10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.028}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Wicherts |first1=Jelte M. |last2=Borsboom |first2=Denny |last3=Dolan |first3=Conor V. |year=2010b |title=Evolution, brain size, and the national IQ of peoples around 3000 years B.C |journal=Personality and Individual Differences |volume=48 |issue=2 |pages=104–106 |doi=10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.020}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Wicherts |first1=Jelte M. |last2=Dolan |first2=Conor V. |last3=Carlson |first3=Jerry S. |last4=van der Maas |first4=Han L.J. |date=June 2010 |title=Raven's test performance of sub-Saharan Africans: Average performance, psychometric properties, and the Flynn Effect |journal=Learning and Individual Differences |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=135–151 |doi=10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.001}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Wicherts |first1=Jelte M. |last2=Dolan |first2=Conor V. |last3=van der Maas |first3=Han L.J. |date=January 2010 |title=A systematic literature review of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans |journal=Intelligence |volume=38 |issue=1 |pages=1–20 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2009.05.002}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Witelson |first1=S. F. |last2=Beresh |first2=H. |last3=Kigar |first3=D. L. |date=February 2006 |title=Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors |journal=Brain |volume=129 |issue=2 |pages=386–398 |doi=10.1093/brain/awh696 |pmid=16339797 |doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite book |last=Wooldridge |first=Adrian |title=Measuring the Mind: Education and Psychology in England c. 1860-c. 1990 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-521-39515-1}}
*{{Cite book |last=Wroe |first=Andrew |title=The Republican Party and Immigration Politics: from Proposition 187 to George W. Bush |publisher=Macmillan |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-230-60053-9 |page=294}}
{{refend}}


{{Human intelligence topics}}
For additional discussion of the effects of controlling for group differences on a variety of outcomes and groups, see {{AYref|Nyborg and Jensen|2001}}, and {{AYref|Kanazawa|2005}}.
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Race And Intelligence}}
===Between nations===
]
Some people have attributed differential economic growth between nations to differences in the intelligence of their populations. One example is Richard Lynn's '']''. The book, is sharply criticized in the peer-reviewed paper ''The Impact of National IQ on Income and Growth''.<ref> Thomas Volken, "."</ref> Another peer-reviewed paper, ''Intelligence, Human Capital, and Economic Growth: An Extreme-Bounds Analysis'', finds a strong connection between intelligence and economic growth<ref>{{AYref|Jones and Schneider|2005}}</ref>. It has been argued that East Asian nations underachieve compared to IQ scores. One suggested explanation is that verbal IQ is more important than visuospatial IQ<ref>{{AYref|La Griffe du Lion|2004}}</ref>.
]

]'s '']'' instead argues that historical differences in economic and technological development for different areas can be explained by differences in geography (which affects factors like population density and spread of new technology) and differences in available crops and domesticatable animals.<ref>] argues in his 2004 ''The Geography of Thought'' that some of these regional differences shaped lasting cultural traits, such as the collectivism required by East Asian rice ], compared with the individualism of ] herding, maritime mercantilism, and money crops wine and olive oil (pp. 34-35).</ref> However, these environmental differences may operate in part by ] for higher levels of IQ<ref>This theory is discussed by {{AYref|Jensen|1998b}} (pp. 435-437), {{AYref|Lynn|1991b}} and {{AYref|Rushton|2000}} in general and by with respect to ''Guns, Germs, and Steel''. See ]. .. {{AYref|Voight et al.|2006}} state generally that "a number of recent studies have detected more signals of adaptation in non-African populations than in Africans, and some of those studies have conjectured that non-Africans might have experienced greater pressures to adapt to new environments than Africans have" ({{AYref|Kayser et al.|2003}}, {{AYref|Akey et al.|2004}}, {{AYref|Storz et al.|2004}}, {{AYref|Stajich and Hahn|2005}}, {{AYref|Carlson et al.|2005}}).</ref>

===For high-achieving minorities===

The book '']'' notes the existence in many nations of minorities that have created and control a disproportionate share of the economy, a ]. Examples include Chinese in Southeast Asia; Whites, Indians, Lebanese and Igbo people of Western Africa; Whites in Latin America; and Jews in pre-World War II Europe, modern America, and modern Russia. These minorities are often resented and sometimes persecuted by the less successful majority.

In the ], Jews, Japanese, and Chinese earn incomes 1.72, 1.32, and 1.12 times the American average, respectively (Sowell, 1981, p. 5). Jews and East Asians have higher rates of college attendance, greater educational attainment, and are many times overrepresented in the ] and many of the United States' most prestigious schools<ref>{{AYref|Sowell|1981}}, pp. 7, 93</ref>, even though ] discriminates against Asians in the admissions process (relative to Whites as well as to other minorities)<ref>A study by Princeton researchers {{AYref|Espanshade and Chung|2005}} analyzes the effects of admission preferences at elite universities in terms of ] points (1600-point scale): Blacks +230; Hispanics +185; Asians −50; Recruited athletes +200; ] (children of alumni) +160. "Our results show that removing consideration of race would have a minimal effect on white applicants to elite universities. The number of accepted white students would increase by 2.4%." Asian percent of accepted students, in contrast, would increase by 33% (from 23.7% to 31.5%). "Nearly four out of every five places in the admitted class not taken by African-American and Hispanic students would be filled by Asians."</ref>. At ], for example, Asian American and Jewish students together make up 51% of the student body, though only constituting roughly 6% of the US population<ref>{{AYref|Hacker|2005}}</ref>. In various ]n nations, Chinese control a majority of the wealth despite being a minority of the population and are resented by the majority, in some cases being the target of violence.<ref>{{AYref|Sowell|1981}}, pp. 133-134; {{AYref|Purdey|2002}}</ref>

Achievement in science, a high-complexity occupation in which practitioners tend to have IQs well above average, also appears consistent with some group IQ disparity. Only 0.25% of the world population is Jewish, but Jews make up an estimated 28% of ] winners in physics, chemistry, medicine, and economics<ref>{{AYref|jinfo.org|2004}}</ref>. In the U.S., these numbers are 2% of the population and 40% of winners. A significant decline in the number of Nobel prizes awarded to Europeans, and a corresponding increase in the number of prizes awarded to US citizens, occurred at the same time as Nazi persecutions of Jews during the 1930s and the Holocaust during the 1940s<ref>{{AYref|Jank et al.|2004}}</ref>.

Groups vary significantly in their IQ subtest profiles. Ashkenazi Jews, for example, demonstrate verbal and mathematical scores more than one standard deviation above average, but visuospatial scores roughly one half standard deviation lower than the White average<ref>{{AYref|Cochran et al.|2005}}, p. 4</ref>, whereas East Asians demonstrate high visuospatial scores, but average or slightly below average verbal scores.<ref>Lynn, , {{AYref|Mackintosh|1998}}, p.178)</ref> Concordantly, the professions in which these populations tend to be over-represented differ <ref>{{AYref|Lynn|1991a}}</ref>. The Asian pattern of subtest scores is found in fully assimilated third-generation Asian Americans, as well as in Inuits and Native Americans (both of ]).<ref>{{AYref|Murray and Herrnstein|1994}}</ref>

==Policy implications==
:''See also: ]''
The public policy implications of IQ and race research are possibly the greatest source of controversy surrounding this issue. For example, the ] policy recommendations of Herrnstein and ] in '']'' were denounced by many. Indeed, even proponents of a partly genetic interpretation of the IQ gap, such as {{A(Y)ref|Rushton and Jensen|2005a}} and {{A(Y)ref|Gottfredson|2005b}}, argue that their interpretation does not in itself demand any particular policy response: while a conservative/] commentator may feel the results justify reductions in ], a ] commentator may argue from a ] point of view (that genetic advantages are undeserved and unjust) for substantial affirmative action<ref>{{AYref|Gottfredson|2005b}}</ref>. According to the "Mainstream Science on Intelligence"; statement published in the ''Wall Street Journal'' in 1994:

<blockquote>The research findings neither dictate nor preclude any particular social policy, because they can never determine our goals. They can, however, help us estimate the likely success and side-effects of pursuing those goals via different means<ref>{{AYref|Gottfredson|1997a}}</ref>.</blockquote>

While not specifically race-related, policies focused on geographical regions or nations may have disproportionate influences on certain racial groups and on cognitive development. Differences in healthcare, nutrition, regulation of environmental toxins, and geographic distribution of diseases and control strategies between the developing world and developed nations have all been subjects of policies or policy recommendations (see ]).

Finally, ] may one day be able to select or change directly ]s found to influence intelligence or racially identifying traits (such as skin color; see gene ]), making them susceptible to biotechnological intervention.<ref>] argues "current debates about whether some of the differences among ethnic and racial groups are cultural or biological will soon become irrelevant, given the coming " ({{AYref|Stock|2002}}, p. 194; race and intelligence discussed on pp. 44-47).</ref>

=End material=
===Notes===
<!--See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags-->
<div style="font-size:90%"><references/></div>

=== See also ===
<!--Many related articles can be found by browsing the "race and intelligence controvsery" category. Please help keep this section slim and avoid using it for POV pushing-->
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

=== References ===
{{main|Race and intelligence (References)}}

===External links===
====Collective Statements====
*
*
* . ]. Adopted December 1994.

====Review Papers====
*
** J. Philippe Rushton & Arthur R. Jensen
** Robert J. Sternberg
** Linda S. Gottfredson
** Richard E. Nisbett
** Lisa Suzuki & Joshua Aronson
** J. Philippe Rushton & Arthur R. Jensen
* Richard E. Nisbett (PDF)
* Charles Murray
* online (page-image) version of ISBN 0815746091

===Others===
* ''Historical and Investigative Research'' Francisco Gil-White 2005.
* by ]
* Race and IQ: , , by ]
*
*
*
* by ] et al.
*
*
*
*
* - pseudonymously released statistical analyses on this and related subjects. ()
* by John J. Ray
* ], "This racist undercurrent in the tide of genetic research: As taboos fall away, there's a danger that denial of racial difference will be replaced with uncritical acceptance," '']''.
*","

{{Race and intelligence}}
{{Race and sex differences}}

]
]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 06:37, 5 January 2025

Discussions and claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines

Race
History
Society
Race and...
By location
Related topics

Discussions of race and intelligence – specifically regarding claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines – have appeared in both popular science and academic research since the modern concept of race was first introduced. With the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups have been observed, though these differences have fluctuated and in many cases steadily decreased over time. Complicating the issue, modern science has concluded that race is a socially constructed phenomenon rather than a biological reality, and there exist various conflicting definitions of intelligence. In particular, the validity of IQ testing as a metric for human intelligence is disputed. Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin.

Pseudoscientific claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have played a central role in the history of scientific racism. The first tests showing differences in IQ scores between different population groups in the United States were the tests of United States Army recruits in World War I. In the 1920s, groups of eugenics lobbyists argued that these results demonstrated that African Americans and certain immigrant groups were of inferior intellect to Anglo-Saxon white people, and that this was due to innate biological differences. In turn, they used such beliefs to justify policies of racial segregation. However, other studies soon appeared, contesting these conclusions and arguing that the Army tests had not adequately controlled for environmental factors, such as socioeconomic and educational inequality between the groups.

Later observations of phenomena such as the Flynn effect and disparities in access to prenatal care highlighted ways in which environmental factors affect group IQ differences. In recent decades, as understanding of human genetics has advanced, claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have been broadly rejected by scientists on both theoretical and empirical grounds.

History of the controversy

Main article: History of the race and intelligence controversy See also: Scientific racism
Autodidact and abolitionist Frederick Douglass (1817–1895) served as a high-profile counterexample to myths of black intellectual inferiority.

Claims of differences in intelligence between races have been used to justify colonialism, slavery, racism, social Darwinism, and racial eugenics. Claims of intellectual inferiority were used to justify British wars and colonial campaigns in Asia. Racial thinkers such as Arthur de Gobineau in France relied crucially on the assumption that black people were innately inferior to white people in developing their ideologies of white supremacy. Even Enlightenment thinkers such as Thomas Jefferson, a slave owner, believed black people to be innately inferior to white people in physique and intellect. At the same time in the United States, prominent examples of African-American genius such the autodidact and abolitionist Frederick Douglass, the pioneering sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois, and the poet Paul Laurence Dunbar stood as high-profile counterexamples to widespread stereotypes of black intellectual inferiority. In Britain, Japan's military victory over Russia in the Russo-Japanese War began to reverse negative stereotypes of "oriental" inferiority.

Alfred Binet (1857–1911), inventor of the first intelligence test

Early IQ testing

The first practical intelligence test, the Binet-Simon Intelligence Test, was developed between 1905 and 1908 by Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon in France for school placement of children. Binet warned that results from his test should not be assumed to measure innate intelligence or used to label individuals permanently. Binet's test was translated into English and revised in 1916 by Lewis Terman (who introduced IQ scoring for the test results) and published under the name Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales. In 1916 Terman wrote that Mexican-Americans, African-Americans, and Native Americans have a mental "dullness seems to be racial, or at least inherent in the family stocks from which they come."

The US Army used a different set of tests developed by Robert Yerkes to evaluate draftees for World War I. Based on the Army's data, prominent psychologists and eugenicists such as Henry H. Goddard, Harry H. Laughlin, and Princeton professor Carl Brigham wrote that people from southern and eastern Europe were less intelligent than native-born Americans or immigrants from the Nordic countries, and that black Americans were less intelligent than white Americans. The results were widely publicized by a lobby of anti-immigration activists, including the conservationist and theorist of scientific racism Madison Grant, who considered the so-called Nordic race to be superior, but under threat because of immigration by "inferior breeds." In his influential work, A Study of American Intelligence, psychologist Carl Brigham used the results of the Army tests to argue for a stricter immigration policy, limiting immigration to countries considered to belong to the "Nordic race".

In the 1920s, some US states enacted eugenic laws, such as Virginia's 1924 Racial Integrity Act, which established the one-drop rule (of 'racial purity') as law. Many scientists reacted negatively to eugenicist claims linking abilities and moral character to racial or genetic ancestry. They pointed to the contribution of environment (such as speaking English as a second language) to test results. By the mid-1930s, many psychologists in the US had adopted the view that environmental and cultural factors played a dominant role in IQ test results. The psychologist Carl Brigham repudiated his own earlier arguments, explaining that he had come to realize that the tests were not a measure of innate intelligence.

Discussions of the issue in the United States, especially in the writings of Madison Grant, influenced German Nazi claims that the "Nordics" were a "master race." As American public sentiment shifted against the Germans, claims of racial differences in intelligence increasingly came to be regarded as problematic. Anthropologists such as Franz Boas, Ruth Benedict, and Gene Weltfish did much to demonstrate that claims about racial hierarchies of intelligence were unscientific. Nonetheless, a powerful eugenics and segregation lobby funded largely by textile-magnate Wickliffe Draper continued to use intelligence studies as an argument for eugenics, segregation, and anti-immigration legislation.

The Pioneer Fund and The Bell Curve

As the desegregation of the American South gained traction in the 1950s, debate about black intelligence resurfaced. Audrey Shuey, funded by Draper's Pioneer Fund, published a new analysis of Yerkes' tests, concluding that black people really were of inferior intellect to white people. This study was used by segregationists to argue that it was to the advantage of black children to be educated separately from the superior white children. In the 1960s, the debate was revived when William Shockley publicly defended the view that black children were innately unable to learn as well as white children. Arthur Jensen expressed similar opinions in his Harvard Educational Review article, "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?," which questioned the value of compensatory education for African-American children. He suggested that poor educational performance in such cases reflected an underlying genetic cause rather than lack of stimulation at home or other environmental factors.

Another revival of public debate followed the appearance of The Bell Curve (1994), a book by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray that supported the general viewpoint of Jensen. A statement in support of Herrnstein and Murray titled "Mainstream Science on Intelligence," was published in The Wall Street Journal with 52 signatures. The Bell Curve also led to critical responses in a statement titled "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" of the American Psychological Association and in several books, including The Bell Curve Debate (1995), Inequality by Design (1996) and a second edition of The Mismeasure of Man (1996) by Stephen Jay Gould.

Some of the authors proposing genetic explanations for group differences have received funding from the Pioneer Fund, which was headed by J. Philippe Rushton until his death in 2012. Arthur Jensen, who jointly with Rushton published a 2005 review article arguing that the difference in average IQs between blacks and whites is partly due to genetics, received $1.1 million in grants from the Pioneer Fund. According to Ashley Montagu, "The University of California's Arthur Jensen, cited twenty-three times in The Bell Curve's bibliography, is the book's principal authority on the intellectual inferiority of blacks."

The Southern Poverty Law Center lists the Pioneer Fund as a hate group, citing the fund's history, its funding of race and intelligence research, and its connections with racist individuals. Other researchers have criticized the Pioneer Fund for promoting scientific racism, eugenics and white supremacy.

Conceptual issues

Intelligence and IQ

Main articles: Human intelligence, Intelligence quotient, and G factor (psychometrics)

The concept of intelligence and the degree to which intelligence is measurable are matters of debate. There is no consensus about how to define intelligence; nor is it universally accepted that it is something that can be meaningfully measured by a single figure. A recurring criticism is that different societies value and promote different kinds of skills and that the concept of intelligence is therefore culturally variable and cannot be measured by the same criteria in different societies. Consequently, some critics argue that it makes no sense to propose relationships between intelligence and other variables.

Correlations between scores on various types of IQ tests led English psychologist Charles Spearman to propose in 1904 the existence of an underlying factor, which he referred to as "g" or "general intelligence", a trait which is supposed to be innate. Another proponent of this view is Arthur Jensen. This view, however, has been contradicted by a number of studies showing that education and changes in environment can significantly improve IQ test results.

Other psychometricians have argued that, whether or not there is such a thing as a general intelligence factor, performance on tests relies crucially on knowledge acquired through prior exposure to the types of tasks that such tests contain. This means that comparisons of test scores between persons with widely different life experiences and cognitive habits do not reveal their relative innate potentials.

Race

Main articles: Race (human categorization) and Race and genetics

The consensus view among geneticists, biologists and anthropologists is that race is a sociopolitical phenomenon rather than a biological one, a view supported by considerable genetics research. The current mainstream view is that race is a social construction based on folk ideologies that construct groups based on social disparities and superficial physical characteristics. A 2023 consensus report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine stated: "In humans, race is a socially constructed designation, a misleading and harmful surrogate for population genetic differences, and has a long history of being incorrectly identified as the major genetic reason for phenotypic differences between groups."

The concept of human "races" as natural and separate divisions within the human species has also been rejected by the American Anthropological Association. The official position of the AAA, adopted in 1998, is that advances in scientific knowledge have made it "clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups" and that "any attempt to establish lines of division among biological populations both arbitrary and subjective." A more recent statement from the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (2019) declares that "Race does not provide an accurate representation of human biological variation. It was never accurate in the past, and it remains inaccurate when referencing contemporary human populations. Humans are not divided biologically into distinct continental types or racial genetic clusters."

Anthropologists such as C. Loring Brace, the philosophers Jonathan Kaplan and Rasmus Winther, and the geneticist Joseph Graves, have argued that the cluster structure of genetic data is dependent on the initial hypotheses of the researcher and the influence of these hypotheses on the choice of populations to sample. When one samples continental groups, the clusters become continental, but if one had chosen other sampling patterns, the clustering would be different. Weiss and Fullerton have noted that if one sampled only Icelanders, Mayans and Maoris, three distinct clusters would form and all other populations could be described as being clinally composed of admixtures of Maori, Icelandic and Mayan genetic materials. Kaplan and Winther conclude that while racial groups are characterized by different allele frequencies, this does not mean that racial classification is a natural taxonomy of the human species, because multiple other genetic patterns can be found in human populations that crosscut racial distinctions. Moreover, the genomic data underdetermines whether one wishes to see subdivisions (i.e., splitters) or a continuum (i.e., lumpers). Under Kaplan and Winther's view, racial groupings are objective social constructions (see Mills 1998) that have conventional biological reality only insofar as the categories are chosen and constructed for pragmatic scientific reasons. Sternberg, Grigorenko & Kidd (2005) argue that the social construction of race derives not from any valid scientific basis but rather "from people's desire to classify."

In studies of human intelligence, race is almost always determined using self-reports rather than analyses of genetic characteristics. According to psychologist David Rowe, self-report is the preferred method for racial classification in studies of racial differences because classification based on genetic markers alone ignore the "cultural, behavioral, sociological, psychological, and epidemiological variables" that distinguish racial groups. Hunt and Carlson disagreed, writing that "Nevertheless, self-identification is a surprisingly reliable guide to genetic composition," citing a study by Tang et al. (2005). Sternberg and Grigorenko disputed Hunt and Carlson's interpretation of Tang's results as supporting the view that racial divisions are biological; rather, "Tang et al.'s point was that ancient geographic ancestry rather than current residence is associated with self-identification and not that such self-identification provides evidence for the existence of biological race."

Group differences

The study of human intelligence is one of the most controversial topics in psychology, in part because of difficulty reaching agreement about the meaning of intelligence and objections to the assumption that intelligence can be meaningfully measured by IQ tests. Claims that there are innate differences in intelligence between racial and ethnic groups—which go back at least to the 19th century—have been criticized for relying on specious assumptions and research methods and for serving as an ideological framework for discrimination and racism.

In a 2012 study of tests of different components of intelligence, Hampshire et al. expressed disagreement with the view of Jensen and Rushton that genetic factors must play a role in IQ differences between races, stating that "it remains unclear ... whether population differences in intelligence test scores are driven by heritable factors or by other correlated demographic variables such as socioeconomic status, education level, and motivation. More relevantly, it is questionable whether relate to a unitary intelligence factor, as opposed to a bias in testing paradigms toward particular components of a more complex intelligence construct." According to Jackson and Weidman,

There are a number of reasons why the genetic argument for race differences in intelligence has not won many adherents in the scientific community. First, even taken on its own terms, the case made by Jensen and his followers did not hold up to scrutiny. Second, the rise of population genetics undercut the claims for a genetic cause of intelligence. Third, the new understanding of institutional racism offered a better explanation for the existence of differences in IQ scores between the races.

Test scores

Main article: Achievement gap in the United States

In the United States, Asians on average score higher than White people, who tend to score higher than Hispanics, who tend to score higher than African Americans. Much greater variation in IQ scores exists within each ethnic group than between them. A 2001 meta-analysis of the results of 6,246,729 participants tested for cognitive ability or aptitude found a difference in average scores between black people and white people of 1.1 standard deviations. Consistent results were found for college and university application tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (N = 2.4 million) and Graduate Record Examination (N = 2.3 million), as well as for tests of job applicants in corporate settings (N = 0.5 million) and in the military (N = 0.4 million).

In response to the controversial 1994 book The Bell Curve, the American Psychological Association (APA) formed a task-force of eleven experts, which issued a report "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" in 1996. Regarding group differences, the report reaffirmed the consensus that differences within groups are much wider than differences between groups, and that claims of ethnic differences in intelligence should be scrutinized carefully, as such claims had been used to justify racial discrimination. The report also acknowledged problems with the racial categories used, as these categories are neither consistently applied, nor homogeneous (see Race and ethnicity in the United States).

In the UK, some African groups have higher average educational attainment and standardized test scores than the overall population. In 2010–2011, white British pupils were 2.3% less likely to have gained 5 A*–C grades at GCSE than the national average, whereas the likelihood was 21.8% above average for those of Nigerian origin, 5.5% above average for those of Ghanaian origin, and 1.4% above average for those of Sierra Leonian origin. For the two other African ethnic groups on which data was available, the likelihood was 23.7% below average for those of Somali origin and 35.3% below average for those of Congolese origin. In 2014, Black-African pupils of 11 language groups were more likely to pass Key Stage 2 Maths 4+ in England than the national average. Overall, the average pass rate by ethnicity was 86.5% for white British (N = 395,787), whereas it was 85.6% for Black-Africans (N = 18,497). Nevertheless, several Black-African language groups, including Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa, Akan, Ga, Swahili, Edo, Ewe, Amharic speakers, and English-speaking Africans, each had an average pass rate above the white British average (total N = 9,314), with the Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba, and Amhara having averages above 90% (N = 2,071). In 2017–2018, the percentage of pupils getting a strong pass (grade 5 or above) in the English and maths GCSE (in Key Stage 4) was 42.7% for whites (N = 396,680) and 44.3% for Black-Africans (N = 18,358).

Flynn effect and the closing gap

Main article: Flynn effect

The 'Flynn effect' — a term coined after researcher James R. Flynn — refers to the substantial rise in raw IQ test scores observed in many parts of the world during the 20th century. In the United States, the increase was continuous and approximately linear from the earliest years of testing to about 1998 when the gains stopped and some tests even showed decreasing test scores. For example, the average scores of black people on some IQ tests in 1995 were the same as the scores of white people in 1945. As one pair of academics phrased it, "the typical African American today probably has a slightly higher IQ than the grandparents of today's average white American."

Flynn himself argued that the dramatic changes having taken place between one just generation and the next pointed strongly at an environmental explanation, and that it is highly unlikely that genetic factors could have accounted for the increasing scores. The Flynn effect, along with Flynn's analysis, continues to hold significance in the context of the black/white IQ gap debate, demonstrating the potential for environmental factors to influence IQ test scores by as much as 1 standard deviation, a scale of change that had previously been doubted.

A distinct but related observation has been the gradual narrowing of the American black-white IQ gap in the last decades of the 20th century, as black test-takers increased their average scores relative to white test-takers. For instance, Vincent reported in 1991 that the black–white IQ gap was decreasing among children, but that it was remaining constant among adults. Similarly, a 2006 study by Dickens and Flynn estimated that the difference between mean scores of black people and white people closed by about 5 or 6 IQ points between 1972 and 2002, a reduction of about one-third. In the same period, the educational achievement disparity also diminished. Reviews by Flynn and Dickens, Mackintosh, and Nisbett et al. accept the gradual closing of the gap as a fact. Flynn and Dickens summarize this trend, stating, "The constancy of the Black-White IQ gap is a myth and therefore cannot be cited as evidence that the racial IQ gap is genetic in origin."

Environmental factors

Health and nutrition

Main article: Impact of health on intelligence
Percentage of children aged 1–5 with blood lead levels at least 10 μg/dL. Black and Hispanic children have much higher levels than white children. A 10 μg/dL increase in blood lead at 24 months is associated with a 5.8-point decline in IQ. Although the Geometric Mean Blood Lead Levels (GM BLL) are declining, a CDC report (2002) states that: "However, the GM BLL for non-Hispanic black children remains higher than that for Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white children, indicating that differences in risk for exposure still persist."

Environmental factors including childhood lead exposure, low rates of breast feeding, and poor nutrition are significantly correlated with poor cognitive development and functioning. For example, childhood exposure to lead — associated with homes in poorer areas — correlates with an average IQ drop of 7 points, and iodine deficiency causes a decline, on average, of 12 IQ points. Such impairments may sometimes be permanent, but in some cases they be partially or wholly compensated for by later growth.

The first two years of life are critical for malnutrition, the consequences of which are often irreversible and include poor cognitive development, educability, and future economic productivity. Mackintosh points out that, for American black people, infant mortality is about twice as high as for white people, and low birth weight is twice as prevalent. At the same time, white mothers are twice as likely to breastfeed their infants, and breastfeeding is directly correlated with IQ for low-birth-weight infants. In this way, a wide number of health-related factors which influence IQ are unequally distributed between the two groups.

The Copenhagen consensus in 2004 stated that lack of both iodine and iron has been implicated in impaired brain development, and this can affect enormous numbers of people: it is estimated that one-third of the total global population is affected by iodine deficiency. In developing countries, it is estimated that 40% of children aged four and under have anaemia because of insufficient iron in their diets.

Other scholars have found that simply the standard of nutrition has a significant effect on population intelligence, and that the Flynn effect may be caused by increasing nutrition standards across the world. James Flynn has himself argued against this view.

Some recent research has argued that the retardation caused in brain development by infectious diseases, many of which are more prevalent in non-white populations, may be an important factor in explaining the differences in IQ between different regions of the world. The findings of this research, showing the correlation between IQ, race and infectious diseases was also shown to apply to the IQ gap in the US, suggesting that this may be an important environmental factor.

A 2013 meta-analysis by the World Health Organization found that, after controlling for maternal IQ, breastfeeding was associated with IQ gains of 2.19 points. The authors suggest that this relationship is causal but state that the practical significance of this gain is debatable; however, they highlight one study suggesting an association between breastfeeding and academic performance in Brazil, where "breastfeeding duration does not present marked variability by socioeconomic position." Colen and Ramey (2014) similarly find that controlling for sibling comparisons within families, rather than between families, reduces the correlation between breastfeeding status and WISC IQ scores by nearly a third, but further find the relationship between breastfeeding duration and WISC IQ scores to be insignificant. They suggest that "much of the beneficial long-term effects typically attributed to breastfeeding, per se, may primarily be due to selection pressures into infant feeding practices along key demographic characteristics such as race and socioeconomic status." Reichman estimates that no more than 3 to 4% of the black–white IQ gap can be explained by black–white disparities in low birth weight.

Education

Several studies have proposed that a large part of the gap in IQ test performance can be attributed to differences in quality of education. Racial discrimination in education has been proposed as one possible cause of differences in educational quality between races. According to a paper by Hala Elhoweris, Kagendo Mutua, Negmeldin Alsheikh and Pauline Holloway, teachers' referral decisions for students to participate in gifted and talented educational programs were influenced in part by the students' ethnicity.

The Abecedarian Early Intervention Project, an intensive early childhood education project, was also able to bring about an average IQ gain of 4.4 points at age 21 in the black children who participated in it compared to controls. Arthur Jensen agreed that the Abecedarian project demonstrated that education can have a significant effect on IQ, but also declared his view that no educational program thus far had been able to reduce the black–white IQ gap by more than a third, and that differences in education are thus unlikely to be its only cause.

A series of studies by Joseph Fagan and Cynthia Holland measured the effect of prior exposure to the kind of cognitive tasks posed in IQ tests on test performance. Assuming that the IQ gap was the result of lower exposure to tasks using the cognitive functions usually found in IQ tests among African American test takers, they prepared a group of African Americans in this type of tasks before taking an IQ test. The researchers found that there was no subsequent difference in performance between the African-Americans and white test takers. Daley and Onwuegbuzie conclude that Fagan and Holland demonstrate that "differences in knowledge between black people and white people for intelligence test items can be erased when equal opportunity is provided for exposure to the information to be tested". A similar argument is made by David Marks who argues that IQ differences correlate well with differences in literacy suggesting that developing literacy skills through education causes an increase in IQ test performance.

A 2003 study found that two variables—stereotype threat and the degree of educational attainment of children's fathers—partially explained the black–white gap in cognitive ability test scores, undermining the hereditarian view that they stemmed from immutable genetic factors.

Socioeconomic environment

Different aspects of the socioeconomic environment in which children are raised have been shown to correlate with part of the IQ gap, but they do not account for the entire gap. According to a 2006 review, these factors account for slightly less than half of one standard deviation.

Other research has focused on different causes of variation within low socioeconomic status (SES) and high SES groups. In the US, among low SES groups, genetic differences account for a smaller proportion of the variance in IQ than among high SES populations. Such effects are predicted by the bioecological hypothesis—that genotypes are transformed into phenotypes through nonadditive synergistic effects of the environment. Nisbett et al. (2012a) suggest that high SES individuals are more likely to be able to develop their full biological potential, whereas low SES individuals are likely to be hindered in their development by adverse environmental conditions. The same review also points out that adoption studies generally are biased towards including only high and high middle SES adoptive families, meaning that they will tend to overestimate average genetic effects. They also note that studies of adoption from lower-class homes to middle-class homes have shown that such children experience a 12 to 18 point gain in IQ relative to children who remain in low SES homes. A 2015 study found that environmental factors (namely, family income, maternal education, maternal verbal ability/knowledge, learning materials in the home, parenting factors, child birth order, and child birth weight) accounted for the black–white gap in cognitive ability test scores.

Test bias

A number of studies have reached the conclusion that IQ tests may be biased against certain groups. The validity and reliability of IQ scores obtained from outside the United States and Europe have been questioned, in part because of the inherent difficulty of comparing IQ scores between cultures. Several researchers have argued that cultural differences limit the appropriateness of standard IQ tests in non-industrialized communities.

A 1996 report by the American Psychological Association states that intelligence can be difficult to compare across cultures, and notes that differing familiarity with test materials can produce substantial differences in test results; it also says that tests are accurate predictors of future achievement for black and white Americans, and are in that sense unbiased. The view that tests accurately predict future educational attainment is reinforced by Nicholas Mackintosh in his 1998 book IQ and Human Intelligence, and by a 1999 literature review by Brown, Reynolds & Whitaker (1999).

James R. Flynn, surveying studies on the topic, notes that the weight and presence of many test questions depends on what sorts of information and modes of thinking are culturally valued.

Stereotype threat and minority status

Main article: Stereotype threat

Stereotype threat is the fear that one's behavior will confirm an existing stereotype of a group with which one identifies or by which one is defined; this fear may in turn lead to an impairment of performance. Testing situations that highlight the fact that intelligence is being measured tend to lower the scores of individuals from racial-ethnic groups who already score lower on average or are expected to score lower. Stereotype threat conditions cause larger than expected IQ differences among groups. Psychometrician Nicholas Mackintosh considers that there is little doubt that the effects of stereotype threat contribute to the IQ gap between black people and white people.

A large number of studies have shown that systemically disadvantaged minorities, such as the African American minority of the United States, generally perform worse in the educational system and in intelligence tests than the majority groups or less disadvantaged minorities such as immigrant or "voluntary" minorities. The explanation of these findings may be that children of caste-like minorities, due to the systemic limitations of their prospects of social advancement, do not have "effort optimism", i.e. they do not have the confidence that acquiring the skills valued by majority society, such as those skills measured by IQ tests, is worthwhile. They may even deliberately reject certain behaviors that are seen as "acting white." Research published in 1997 indicates that part of the black–white gap in cognitive ability test scores is due to racial differences in test motivation.

Some researchers have suggested that stereotype threat should not be interpreted as a factor in real-life performance gaps, and have raised the possibility of publication bias. Other critics have focused on correcting what they claim are misconceptions of early studies showing a large effect. However, numerous meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown significant evidence for the effects of stereotype threat, though the phenomenon defies over-simplistic characterization. For instance, one meta-analysis found that with female subjects "subtle threat-activating cues produced the largest effect, followed by blatant and moderately explicit cues" while with minorities "moderately explicit stereotype threat-activating cues produced the largest effect, followed by blatant and subtle cues".

Some researchers have argued that studies of stereotype threat may in fact systematically under-represent its effects, since such studies measure "only that portion of psychological threat that research has identified and remedied. To the extent that unidentified or unremedied psychological threats further undermine performance, the results underestimate the bias."

Research into possible genetic factors

See also: Heritability of IQ

Although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that mean group-level disparities (between-group differences) in IQ necessarily have a genetic basis. The scientific consensus is that there is no evidence for a genetic component behind IQ differences between racial groups. Growing evidence indicates that environmental factors, not genetic ones, explain the racial IQ gap.

Genetics of race and intelligence

Main article: Race and genetics

Geneticist Alan R. Templeton argued that the question about the possible genetic effects on the test score gap is muddled by the general focus on "race" rather than on populations defined by gene frequency or by geographical proximity, and by the general insistence on phrasing the question in terms of heritability. Templeton pointed out that racial groups neither represent sub-species nor distinct evolutionary lineages, and that therefore there is no basis for making claims about the general intelligence of races. He argued that, for these reasons, the search for possible genetic influences on the black–white test score gap is a priori flawed, because there is no genetic material shared by all Africans or by all Europeans. Mackintosh (2011), on the other hand, argued that by using genetic cluster analysis to correlate gene frequencies with continental populations it might be possible to show that African populations have a higher frequency of certain genetic variants that contribute to differences in average intelligence. Such a hypothetical situation could hold without all Africans carrying the same genes or belonging to a single evolutionary lineage. According to Mackintosh, a biological basis for the observed gap in IQ test performance thus cannot be ruled out on a priori grounds.

Hunt (2010, p. 447) noted that "no genes related to difference in cognitive skills have across the various racial and ethnic groups have ever been discovered. The argument for genetic differences has been carried forward largely by circumstantial evidence. Of course, tomorrow afternoon genetic mechanisms producing racial and ethnic differences in intelligence might be discovered, but there have been a lot of investigations, and tomorrow has not come for quite some time now." Mackintosh (2011, p. 344) concurred, noting that while several environmental factors have been shown to influence the IQ gap, the evidence for a genetic influence has been negligible. A 2012 review by Nisbett et al. (2012a) concluded that the entire IQ gap can be explained by known environmental factors, and Mackintosh found this view to be plausible.

More recent research attempting to identify genetic loci associated with individual-level differences in IQ has yielded promising results, which led the editorial board of Nature to issue a statement differentiating this research from the "racist" pseudoscience which it acknowledged has dogged intelligence research since its inception. It characterized the idea of genetically determined differences in intelligence between races as definitively false. Analysis of polygenic scores sampled from the 1000 Genomes Project has likewise found no evidence that intelligence was under diversifying selection in Africans and Europeans, suggesting that genetic differences make up a negligible component of the observed Black-White gap in IQ.

Heritability within and between groups

An environmental factor that varies between groups but not within groups can cause group differences in a trait that is otherwise 100 percent heritable.

Twin studies of intelligence have reported high heritability values. However, these studies have been criticized for being based on questionable assumptions. When used in the context of human behavior genetics, the term "heritability" can be misleading, as it does not necessarily convey information about the relative importance of genetic or environmental factors on the development of a given trait, nor does it convey the extent to which that trait is genetically determined. Arguments in support of a genetic explanation of racial differences in IQ are sometimes fallacious. For instance, hereditarians have sometimes cited the failure of known environmental factors to account for such differences, or the high heritability of intelligence within races, as evidence that racial differences in IQ are genetic.

Psychometricians have found that intelligence is substantially heritable within populations, with 30–50% of variance in IQ scores in early childhood being attributable to genetic factors in analyzed US populations, increasing to 75–80% by late adolescence. In biology heritability is defined as the ratio of variation attributable to genetic differences in an observable trait to the trait's total observable variation. The heritability of a trait describes the proportion of variation in the trait that is attributable to genetic factors within a particular population. A heritability of 1 indicates that variation correlates fully with genetic variation and a heritability of 0 indicates that there is no correlation between the trait and genes at all. In psychological testing, heritability tends to be understood as the degree of correlation between the results of a test taker and those of their biological parents. However, since high heritability is simply a correlation between child and parents, it does not describe the causes of heritability which in humans can be either genetic or environmental.

Therefore, a high heritability measure does not imply that a trait is genetic or unchangeable. In addition, environmental factors that affect all group members equally will not be measured by heritability, and the heritability of a trait may also change over time in response to changes in the distribution of genetic and environmental factors. High heritability does not imply that all of the heritability is genetically determined; rather, it can also be due to environmental differences that affect only a certain genetically defined group (indirect heritability).

The figure to the right demonstrates how heritability works. In each of the two gardens the difference between tall and short cornstalks is 100% heritable, as cornstalks that are genetically disposed for growing tall will become taller than those without this disposition. But the difference in height between the cornstalks to the left and those on the right is 100% environmental, as it is due to different nutrients being supplied to the two gardens. Hence, the causes of differences within a group and between groups may not be the same, even when looking at traits that are highly heritable.

Spearman's hypothesis

Main article: Spearman's hypothesis

Spearman's hypothesis states that the magnitude of the black–white difference in tests of cognitive ability depends entirely or mainly on the extent to which a test measures general mental ability, or g. The hypothesis was first formalized by Arthur Jensen, who devised the statistical "method of correlated vectors" to test it. If Spearman's hypothesis holds true, then the cognitive tasks that have the highest g-load are the tasks in which the gap between black and white test takers are greatest. Jensen and Rushton took this to show that the cause of g and the cause of the gap are the same—in their view, genetic differences.

Mackintosh (2011, pp. 338–39) acknowledges that Jensen and Rushton showed a modest correlation between g-loading, heritability, and the test score gap, but does not agree that this demonstrates a genetic origin of the gap. Mackintosh argues that it is exactly those tests that Rushton and Jensen consider to have the highest g-loading and heritability, such as the Wechsler test, that have seen the greatest increases in black performance due to the Flynn effect. This likely suggests that they are also the most sensitive to environmental changes, which undermines Jensen's argument that the black–white gap is most likely caused by genetic factors. Nisbett et al. (2012a, p. 146) make the same point, noting also that the increase in the IQ scores of black test takers necessarily indicates an increase in g.

James Flynn argued that his findings undermine Spearman's hypothesis. In a 2006 study, he and William Dickens found that between 1972 and 2002 "The standard measure of the g gap between Blacks and Whites declined virtually in tandem with the IQ gap." Flynn also criticized Jensen's basic assumption that a correlation between g-loading and test score gap implies a genetic cause for the gap. In a 2014 suite of meta-analyses, along with co-authors Jan te Nijenhuis and Daniel Metzen, he showed that the same negative correlation between IQ gains and g-loading obtains for cognitive deficits of known environmental cause: iodine deficiency, prenatal cocaine exposure, fetal alcohol syndrome, and traumatic brain injury.

Adoption studies

A number of IQ studies have been done on the effect of similar rearing conditions on children from different races. The hypothesis is that this can be determined by investigating whether black children adopted into white families demonstrated gains in IQ test scores relative to black children reared in black families. Depending on whether their test scores are more similar to their biological or adoptive families, that could be interpreted as supporting either a genetic or an environmental hypothesis. Critiques of such studies question whether the environment of black children—even when raised in white families—is truly comparable to the environment of white children. Several reviews of the adoption study literature have suggested that it is probably impossible to avoid confounding biological and environmental factors in this type of study. Another criticism by Nisbett et al. (2012a, pp. 134) is that adoption studies on the whole tend to be carried out in a restricted set of environments, mostly in the medium-high SES range, where heritability is higher than in the low-SES range.

The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study (1976) examined the IQ test scores of 122 adopted children and 143 nonadopted children reared by advantaged white families. The children were restudied ten years later. The study found higher IQ for white people compared to black people, both at age 7 and age 17. Acknowledging the existence of confounding factors, Scarr and Weinberg, the authors of the original study, did not consider that it provided support for either the hereditarian or environmentalist view.

Three other studies lend support to environmental explanations of group IQ differences:

  • Eyferth (1961) studied the out-of-wedlock children of black and white soldiers stationed in Germany after World War II who were then raised by white German mothers in what has become known as the Eyferth study. He found no significant differences in average IQ between groups.
  • Tizard et al. (1972) studied black (West Indian), white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. Two out of three tests found no significant differences. One test found higher scores for non-white people.
  • Moore (1986) compared black and mixed-race children adopted by either black or white middle-class families in the United States. Moore observed that 23 black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean score than 23 age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained these differences.

Frydman and Lynn (1989) showed a mean IQ of 119 for Korean infants adopted by Belgian families. After correcting for the Flynn effect, the IQ of the adopted Korean children was still 10 points higher than that of the Belgian children.

Reviewing the evidence from adoption studies, Mackintosh finds that environmental and genetic variables remain confounded and considers evidence from adoption studies inconclusive, and fully compatible with a 100% environmental explanation. Similarly, Drew Thomas argues that race differences in IQ that appear in adoption studies are in fact an artifact of methodology, and that East Asian IQ advantages and black IQ disadvantages disappear when this is controlled for.

Racial admixture studies

Most people have ancestry from different geographical regions. In particular, African Americans typically have ancestors from both Africa and Europe, with, on average, 20% of their genome inherited from European ancestors. If racial IQ gaps have a partially genetic basis, one might expect black people with a higher degree of European ancestry to score higher on IQ tests than black people with less European ancestry, because the genes inherited from European ancestors would likely include some genes with a positive effect on IQ. Geneticist Alan Templeton has argued that an experiment based on the Mendelian "common garden" design, where specimens with different hybrid compositions are subjected to the same environmental influences, are the only way to definitively show a causal relation between genes and group differences in IQ. Summarizing the findings of admixture studies, he concludes that they have shown no significant correlation between any cognitive ability and the degree of African or European ancestry.

Studies have employed different ways of measuring or approximating relative degrees of ancestry from Africa and Europe. Some studies have used skin color as a measure, and others have used blood groups. Loehlin (2000) surveys the literature and argues that the blood groups studies may be seen as providing some support to the genetic hypothesis, even though the correlation between ancestry and IQ was quite low. He finds that studies by Eyferth (1961), Willerman, Naylor & Myrianthopoulos (1970) did not find a correlation between degree of African/European ancestry and IQ. The latter study did find a difference based on the race of the mother, with children of white mothers with black fathers scoring higher than children of black mothers and white fathers. Loehlin considers that such a finding is compatible with either a genetic or an environmental cause. All in all Loehlin finds admixture studies inconclusive and recommends more research.

Reviewing the evidence from admixture studies Hunt (2010) considers it to be inconclusive because of too many uncontrolled variables. Mackintosh (2011, p. 338) quotes a statement by Nisbett (2009) to the effect that admixture studies have not provided a shred of evidence in favor of a genetic basis for the IQ gap.

Mental chronometry

Main article: Mental chronometry

Mental chronometry measures the elapsed time between the presentation of a sensory stimulus and the subsequent behavioral response by the participant. These studies have shown inconsistent results when comparing black and white populations groups, with some studies showing whites outperforming blacks, and others showing blacks outperforming whites.

Arthur Jensen argued that this reaction time (RT) is a measure of the speed and efficiency with which the brain processes information, and that scores on most types of RT tasks tend to correlate with scores on standard IQ tests as well as with g. Nisbett argues that some studies have found correlations closer to 0.2, and that a correlation is not always found. Nisbett points to the Jensen & Whang (1993) study in which a group of Chinese Americans had longer reaction times than a group of European Americans, despite having higher IQs. Nisbett also mentions findings in Flynn (1991) and Deary (2001) suggesting that movement time (the measure of how long it takes a person to move a finger after making the decision to do so) correlates with IQ just as strongly as reaction time, and that average movement time is faster for black people than for white people. Mackintosh (2011, p. 339) considers reaction time evidence unconvincing and comments that other cognitive tests that also correlate well with IQ show no disparity at all, for example the habituation/dishabituation test. He further comments that studies show that rhesus monkeys have shorter reaction times than American college students, suggesting that different reaction times may not tell us anything useful about intelligence.

Brain size

Main article: Brain size

A number of studies have reported a moderate statistical correlation between differences in IQ and brain size between individuals in the same group. Some scholars have reported differences in average brain sizes between racial groups, although this is unlikely to be a good measure of IQ as brain size also differs between men and women, but without significant differences in IQ. At the same time newborn black children have the same average brain size as white children, suggesting that the difference in average size could be accounted for by differences in environment. Several environmental factors that reduce brain size have been demonstrated to disproportionately affect black children.

Archaeological data

Archaeological evidence does not support claims by Rushton and others that black people's cognitive ability was inferior to white people's during prehistoric times.

Policy relevance and ethics

Main article: Intelligence and public policy

The ethics of research on race and intelligence has long been a subject of debate: in a 1996 report of the American Psychological Association; in guidelines proposed by Gray and Thompson and by Hunt and Carlson; and in two editorials in Nature in 2009 by Steven Rose and by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams.

Steven Rose maintains that the history of eugenics makes this field of research difficult to reconcile with current ethical standards for science. On the other hand, James R. Flynn has argued that had there been a ban on research on possibly poorly conceived ideas, much valuable research on intelligence testing (including his own discovery of the Flynn effect) would not have occurred.

Many have argued for increased interventions in order to close the gaps. Flynn writes that "America will have to address all the aspects of black experience that are disadvantageous, beginning with the regeneration of inner city neighborhoods and their schools." Especially in developing nations, society has been urged to take on the prevention of cognitive impairment in children as a high priority. Possible preventable causes include malnutrition, infectious diseases such as meningitis, parasites, cerebral malaria, in utero drug and alcohol exposure, newborn asphyxia, low birth weight, head injuries, lead poisoning and endocrine disorders.

See also

References

Notes

Citations

  1. ^ Mercer, Jonathan (October 1, 2023). "Racism, Stereotypes, and War". direct.mit.edu. Journal of International Security. Retrieved 2024-02-04.
  2. Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 23.
  3. Stewart, Roderick M. 1999. "The Claims of Frederick Douglass Philosophically Considered." Pp. 155–56 in Frederick Douglass: A Critical Reader, edited by B. E. Lawson and F. M. Kirkland. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-20578-4. "Moreover, though he does not make the point explicitly, again the very fact that Douglass is ably disputing this argument on this occasion celebrating a select few's intellect and will (or moral character)—this fact constitutes a living counterexample to the narrowness of the pro-slavery definition of humans."
  4. Marable, Manning (2011), Living Black History: How Reimagining the African-American Past Can Remake America's Racial Future, p. 96. ISBN 978-0-465-04395-8.
  5. Tonooka, Chika (2017). "Reverse Emulation and the Cult of Japanese Efficiency in Edwardian Britain". The Historical Journal. 60 (1): 95–119. doi:10.1017/S0018246X15000539. ISSN 0018-246X. JSTOR 26343378. S2CID 162698331.
  6. Plotnik & Kouyoumdjian 2011.
  7. Terman, Lewis (1916). The Measurement Of Intelligence. Houghton, Mifflin and Company. p. 91. OCLC 557712625.
  8. Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 116.
  9. Jackson & Weidman 2004, pp. 116, 309.
  10. Pickren & Rutherford 2010, p. 163.
  11. Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 145.
  12. Spiro 2009.
  13. Ludy 2006
  14. Jackson & Weidman 2004, pp. 130–32.
  15. ^ Tucker 2002.
  16. Jackson 2005.
  17. Shurkin 2006.
  18. Jensen 1969, pp. 1–123.
  19. Panofsky, Aaron (2014). Misbehaving Science. Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-05831-3.
  20. Alland 2002, pp. 79–80.
  21. Herrnstein & Murray 1994.
  22. ^ Maltby, Day & Macaskill 2007
  23. Mackintosh 1998
  24. Graves 2002a.
  25. Graves 2002b.
  26. Grossman & Kaufman 2001
  27. Adam, Miller (1994). "The Pioneer Fund: Bankrolling the Professors of Hate". The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education (6): 58–61. doi:10.2307/2962466. JSTOR 2962466.
  28. Blakemore, Bill; Jennings, Peter; Nissen, Beth (November 22, 1994). "The Bell Curve and the Pioneer Fund". ABC World News Tonight. ABC News. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved May 1, 2020. Vanderbilt Television News Archive : ABC Evening News for Tuesday, Nov 22, 1994. Headline: American Agenda (Intelligence) Archived January 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  29. Montagu, Ashley (2002). Race and IQ (2 ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-510221-5.
  30. Berlet 2003.
  31. Pioneer Fund Board Archived 2011-05-25 at the Wayback Machine
  32. Falk 2008, p. 18
  33. Wroe 2008, p. 81
  34. ^ Schacter, Gilbert & Wegner 2007, pp. 350–1
  35. ^ Sternberg, Grigorenko & Kidd 2005
  36. Deary, I. J.; Lawn, M.; Bartholomew, D. J. (2008). ""A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931-1938": Correction to Deary, Lawn, and Bartholomew (2008)" (PDF). History of Psychology. 11 (3): 156–157. doi:10.1037/1093-4510.11.3.163. hdl:20.500.11820/5417f3c7-e873-40b9-ad73-19c6acc9e35b. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-06. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
  37. Jensen 1998, p. 445ff.
  38. Ceci, Stephen J. (1991). "How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence". Developmental Psychology. 27 (5): 703–722. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.703.
  39. ^ Dickens & Flynn 2006.
  40. Richie, Stuart J.; Tucker-Drob, Elliot (June 2018). "How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis". Psychological Science. 29 (8).
  41. Mackintosh 2011, p. 359.
  42. ^ Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field (Consensus Study Report). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. doi:10.17226/26902. ISBN 978-0-309-70065-8. PMID 36989389. In humans, race is a socially constructed designation, a misleading and harmful surrogate for population genetic differences, and has a long history of being incorrectly identified as the major genetic reason for phenotypic differences between groups.
  43. Daley & Onwuegbuzie 2011, p. 294.
  44. Templeton, A. (2016). EVOLUTION AND NOTIONS OF HUMAN RACE. In Losos J. & Lenski R. (Eds.), How Evolution Shapes Our Lives: Essays on Biology and Society (pp. 346–361). Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv7h0s6j.26. That this view reflects the consensus among American anthropologists is stated in: Wagner, Jennifer K.; Yu, Joon-Ho; Ifekwunigwe, Jayne O.; Harrell, Tanya M.; Bamshad, Michael J.; Royal, Charmaine D. (February 2017). "Anthropologists' views on race, ancestry, and genetics". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 162 (2): 318–327. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23120. PMC 5299519. PMID 27874171. See also: American Association of Physical Anthropologists (27 March 2019). "AAPA Statement on Race and Racism". American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
  45. Smay & Armelagos 2000.
  46. Rotimi, Charles N. (2004). "Are medical and nonmedical uses of large-scale genomic markers conflating genetics and 'race'?". Nature Genetics. 36 (11 Suppl): 43–47. doi:10.1038/ng1439. PMID 15508002. Two facts are relevant: (i) as a result of different evolutionary forces, including natural selection, there are geographical patterns of genetic variations that correspond, for the most part, to continental origin; and (ii) observed patterns of geographical differences in genetic information do not correspond to our notion of social identities, including 'race' and 'ethnicity
  47. Schaefer 2008
  48. AAA 1998
  49. "AAPA Statement on Race & Racism". Archived from the original on 2022-01-25. Retrieved 2020-06-28.
  50. Brace 2005
  51. Kaplan, Jonathan Michael; Winther, Rasmus Grønfeldt (2014). "Realism, Antirealism, and Conventionalism About Race". Philosophy of Science. 81 (5): 1039–1052. doi:10.1086/678314. S2CID 55148854.
  52. Winther, Rasmus Grønfeldt (2015). "The Genetic Reification of 'Race'?: A Story of Two Mathematical Methods" (PDF). Critical Philosophy of Race. 2 (2): 204–223.
  53. Kaplan & Winther (2013).
  54. Graves, Joseph (7 June 2006). "What We Know and What We Don't Know: Human Genetic Variation and the Social Construction of Race". Race and Genomics. Archived from the original on 3 June 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
  55. Weiss, K. M.; Fullerton, S. M. (2005). "Racing around, getting nowhere". Evolutionary Anthropology. 14 (5): 165–169. doi:10.1002/evan.20079. S2CID 84927946.
  56. Mills, C. W. (1988). "But What Are You Really? The Metaphysics of Race". Blackness visible: essays on philosophy and race. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 41–66.
  57. Rowe 2005
  58. ^ Hunt & Carlson 2007
  59. Sternberg & Grigorenko 2007
  60. ^ Neisser et al. 1996.
  61. ^ Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 222.
  62. Hampshire et al. 2012.
  63. Reynolds, Cecil R.; Altmann, Robert A.; Allen, Daniel N. (2021). "The Problem of Bias in Psychological Assessment". Mastering Modern Psychological Testing. Springer. pp. 573–613, 582. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59455-8_15. ISBN 978-3-030-59454-1. S2CID 236660997.
  64. Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. SAGE. 2012. p. 1209. ISBN 978-1-4129-8152-1. Archived from the original on 2023-03-20. Retrieved 2018-01-20.
  65. Roth et al. 2001
  66. Demie, Feyisa; McLean, Christabel (1 December 2007). "Raising the achievement of African heritage pupils: a case study of good practice in British schools". Educational Studies. 33 (4): 415–434. doi:10.1080/03055690701423606. ISSN 0305-5698. S2CID 144579288.
  67. Rutter, Jill (2013). Back to basics: Towards a successful and cost-effective integration policy. Institute for Public Policy Research. p. 43. Archived from the original on 2020-04-13. Retrieved 2020-05-23. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  68. Feyisa Demie, Andrew Hau (2016). Language Diversity and Attainment in Primary Schools in England (PDF). Lambeth Research And Statistics Unit. p. 18. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-06. Retrieved 2020-05-24.
  69. "GCSE English and maths results". Gov.UK. 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-09-20. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
  70. Mackintosh 1998, p. 162
  71. Swain, Carol (2003). Contemporary voices of white nationalism in America. Cambridge, UK New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-521-01693-3. Note: this quote is from the authors' introductory essay, not from the interviews.
  72. Dickens & Flynn 2001.
  73. Vincent 1991.
  74. Neisser, Ulric (Ed). 1998. The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
  75. Mackintosh 2011.
  76. ^ Nisbett et al. 2012a.
  77. ^ Bellinger, Stiles & Needleman 1992
  78. MMWR 2005
  79. ^ Campbell et al. 2002
  80. Ivanovic et al. 2004
  81. Saloojee & Pettifor 2001
  82. Agency For Toxic Substances And Disease Registry Case Studies In Environmental Medicine (CSEM) (2012-02-15). "Principles of Pediatric Environmental Health, The Child as Susceptible Host: A Developmental Approach to Pediatric Environmental Medicine" (PDF). U.S. Department for Health and Human Services. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-01-31. Retrieved 2019-01-30.
  83. Lanphear, Bruce P.; Hornung, Richard; Khoury, Jane; Yolton, Kimberly; Baghurst, Peter; Bellinger, David C.; Canfield, Richard L.; Dietrich, Kim N.; Bornschein, Robert; Greene, Tom; Rothenberg, Stephen J.; Needleman, Herbert L.; Schnaas, Lourdes; Wasserman, Gail; Graziano, Joseph; Roberts, Russell (2005-03-18). "Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Children's Intellectual Function: An International Pooled Analysis". Environmental Health Perspectives. 113 (7): 894–899. Bibcode:2005EnvHP.113..894L. doi:10.1289/ehp.7688. ISSN 0091-6765. PMC 1257652. PMID 16002379.
  84. Qian et al. 2005
  85. Feyrer, James; Politi, Dimitra; Weil, David N. (2017). "The Cognitive Effects of Micronutrient Deficiency: Evidence from Salt Iodization in the United States" (PDF). Journal of the European Economic Association. 15 (2): 355–387. doi:10.1093/jeea/jvw002. PMC 6919660. PMID 31853231. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-13. Retrieved 2019-07-22.
  86. The Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition Archived 2011-07-17 at the Wayback Machine, 2008.
  87. Mackintosh 2011, pp. 343–44.
  88. Behrman, Alderman & Hoddinott 2004
  89. Colom, R.; Lluis-Font, J. M.; Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2005). "The generational intelligence gains are caused by decreasing variance in the lower half of the distribution: supporting evidence for the nutrition hypothesis". Intelligence. 33: 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.07.010.
  90. Flynn, J. R. (2009a). "Requiem for nutrition as the cause of IQ gains: Raven's gains in Britain 1938 to 2008". Economics and Human Biology. 7 (1): 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.009. PMID 19251490.
  91. Eppig 2011
  92. Horta, Bernardo L.; Victoria, Cesar G. (2013). "Long-term effects of breastfeeding – a systemic review" (PDF). World Health Organization. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 April 2020. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  93. Colen, Cynthia G.; Ramey, David M. (2014). "Is Breast Truly Best? Estimating the Effect of Breastfeeding on Long-term Child Wellbeing in the United States Using Sibling Comparisons". Social Science & Medicine. 109 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.027. PMC 4077166. PMID 24698713.
  94. Reichman 2005
  95. Manly et al. 2002 and Manly et al. 2004
  96. Mickelson 2003
  97. Elhoweris et al. 2005
  98. Miele 2002, p. 133
  99. Fagan, Joseph F; Holland, Cynthia R (2002). "Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ". Intelligence. 30 (4): 361–387. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00080-6.
  100. Fagan, J.F.; Holland, C.R. (2007). "Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing". Intelligence. 35 (4): 319–334. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.009.
  101. Daley & Onwuegbuzie 2011.
  102. Marks, D.F. (2010). "IQ variations across time, race, and nationality: An artifact of differences in literacy skills". Psychological Reports. 106 (3): 643–664. doi:10.2466/pr0.106.3.643-664. PMID 20712152. S2CID 12179547.
  103. Barry, Scott (2010-08-23). "The Flynn Effect and IQ Disparities Among Races, Ethnicities, and Nations: Are There Common Links?". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on 2023-03-20. Retrieved 2014-08-22.
  104. McKay, Patrick F.; Doverspike, Dennis; Bowen-Hilton, Doreen; McKay, Quintonia D. (2003). "The Effects of Demographic Variables and Stereotype Threat on Black/White Differences in Cognitive Ability Test Performance". Journal of Business and Psychology. 18 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1023/A:1025062703113. S2CID 142317051.
  105. Hunt 2010, p. 428.
  106. Magnuson, Katherine A.; Duncan, Greg J. (December 2006). "The role of family socioeconomic resources in the black–white test score gap among young children". Developmental Review. 26 (4): 365–399. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.06.004.
  107. Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1971). "Race, social class, and IQ". Science. 174 (4016): 1285–95. Bibcode:1971Sci...174.1285S. doi:10.1126/science.174.4016.1285. PMID 5167501.
  108. Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1974). "Some myths about heritability and IQ". Nature. 251 (5475): 463–464. Bibcode:1974Natur.251..463S. doi:10.1038/251463b0. S2CID 32437709.
  109. D. C. Rowe. (1994). The Limits of Family Influence: Genes, Experience and Behaviour. Guilford Press. London
  110. Kirkpatrick, R. M.; McGue, M.; Iacono, W. G. (2015). "Replication of a gene-environment interaction Via Multimodel inference: additive-genetic variance in adolescents' general cognitive ability increases with family-of-origin socioeconomic status". Behav Genet. 45 (2): 200–14. doi:10.1007/s10519-014-9698-y. PMC 4374354. PMID 25539975.
  111. Bronfenbrenner, Urie; Ceci, Stephen J. (October 1994). "Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model". Psychological Review. 101 (4): 568–586. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568. PMID 7984707. S2CID 17402964.
  112. Cottrell, Newman & Roisman 2015.
  113. Cronshaw et al. 2006, p. 278
  114. Verney et al. 2005
  115. Borsboom 2006
  116. Shuttleworth-Edwards et al. 2004
  117. Richardson 2004
  118. Hunt & Wittmann 2008
  119. Irvine 1983
  120. Irvine & Berry 1988 a collection of articles by several authors discussing the limits of assessment by intelligence tests in different communities in the world. In particular, Reuning (1988) describes the difficulties in devising and administering tests for Kalahari bushmen.
  121. Mackintosh 1998, p. 174: "Despite widespread belief to the contrary, however, there is ample evidence, both in Britain and the USA, that IQ tests predict educational attainment just about as well in ethnic minorities as in the white majority."
  122. "Reflections about intelligence over 40 years" (PDF). Intelligence (70): 73–83. 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-02-03. Retrieved 2019-02-02.
  123. Aronson, Wilson & Akert 2005
  124. Steele, Claude M. (1997). "A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance". American Psychologist. 52 (6): 613–629. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.319.8283. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613. ISSN 0003-066X. PMID 9174398. S2CID 19952.
  125. Mackintosh 2011, p. 348.
  126. Ogbu 1978.
  127. Ogbu 1994.
  128. Chan, D.; Schmitt, N.; DeShon, R. P.; Clause, C. S.; Delbridge, K. (April 1997). "Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation". The Journal of Applied Psychology. 82 (2): 300–310. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.300. ISSN 0021-9010. PMID 9109288.
  129. Ganley CM, Mingle LA, Ryan AM, Ryan K, Vasilyeva M, Perry M (October 2013). "An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls' mathematics performance" (PDF). Developmental Psychology. 49 (10): 1886–97. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.353.4436. doi:10.1037/a0031412. PMID 23356523. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 July 2014.
  130. Stoet G, Geary DC (2012). "Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement?". Review of General Psychology. 16: 93–102. doi:10.1037/a0026617. S2CID 145724069. Pdf. Archived 2016-01-12 at the Wayback Machine
  131. Flore PC, Wicherts JM (February 2015). "Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis". Journal of School Psychology. 53 (1): 25–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002. PMID 25636259. S2CID 206516995.
  132. Sackett PR, Hardison CM, Cullen MJ (January 2004). "On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests" (PDF). The American Psychologist. 59 (1): 7–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.7. PMID 14736315. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-04-04.
  133. Pennington CR, Heim D, Levy AR, Larkin DT (2016-01-11). "Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators". PLOS ONE. 11 (1): e0146487. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1146487P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146487. PMC 4713435. PMID 26752551.
  134. ^ Nguyen HH, Ryan AM (November 2008). "Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence". The Journal of Applied Psychology. 93 (6): 1314–34. doi:10.1037/a0012702. PMID 19025250. S2CID 36769821.
  135. ^ Walton, Gregory M.; Spencer, Steven J. (2009-09-01). "Latent Ability: Grades and Test Scores Systematically Underestimate the Intellectual Ability of Negatively Stereotyped Students". Psychological Science. 20 (9): 1132–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x. ISSN 0956-7976. PMID 19656335. S2CID 25810191.
  136. Gentile, Ambra; Boca, Stefano; Giammusso, Isabella (2018-11-01). "'You play like a Woman!' Effects of gender stereotype threat on Women's performance in physical and sport activities: A meta-analysis". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 39: 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.013. ISSN 1469-0292. S2CID 149490634.
  137. Lamont, Ruth A.; Swift, Hannah J.; Abrams, Dominic (2015). "A Review and Meta-Analysis of Age-Based Stereotype Threat: Negative Stereotypes, Not Facts, Do the Damage". Psychology and Aging. 30 (1): 180–193. doi:10.1037/a0038586. ISSN 1939-1498. PMC 4360754. PMID 25621742.
  138. Picho, Katherine; Rodriguez, Ariel; Finnie, Lauren (May 2013). "Exploring the Moderating Role of Context on the Mathematics Performance of Females Under Stereotype Threat: A Meta-Analysis". The Journal of Social Psychology. 153 (3): 299–333. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.737380. PMID 23724702. S2CID 45950675.
  139. Liu, Songqi; Liu, Pei; Wang, Mo; Zhang, Baoshan (July 2020). "Effectiveness of Stereotype Threat Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review". Journal of Applied Psychology. currently in press (6): 921–949. doi:10.1037/apl0000770. PMID 32772526. S2CID 221098319.
  140. Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments". American Psychologist. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699. ISSN 1935-990X. PMID 22233090.
  141. ^ Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012). "Group differences in IQ are best understood as environmental in origin". American Psychologist. 67 (6): 503–504. doi:10.1037/a0029772. ISSN 0003-066X. PMID 22963427.
  142. Bird, Kevin; Jackson, John P.; Winston, Andrew S. (2024). "Confronting Scientific Racism in Psychology: Lessons from Evolutionary Biology and Genetics". American Psychologist. 79 (4): 497–508. doi:10.1037/amp0001228. PMID 39037836. Recent articles claim that the folk categories of race are genetically meaningful divisions, and that evolved genetic differences among races and nations are important for explaining immutable differences in cognitive ability, educational attainment, crime, sexual behavior, and wealth; all claims that are opposed by a strong scientific consensus to the contrary.
  143. Ceci & Williams 2009, pp. 788–789, "There is an emerging consensus about racial and gender equality in genetic determinants of intelligence, most researchers, including ourselves, agree that genes do not explain between-group differences".
  144. Hunt 2010, p. 447, "It is worth remembering that no genes related to difference in cognitive skills across the various racial and ethnic groups have ever been discovered. The argument for genetic differences has been carried forward largely by circumstantial evidence. Of course, tomorrow afternoon genetic mechanisms producing racial and ethnic differences in intelligence might be discovered, but there have been a lot of investigations, and tomorrow has not come for quite some time now."
  145. Mackintosh 2011, pp. 334–338, 344.
  146. ^ Kaplan, Jonathan Michael (January 2015). "Race, IQ, and the search for statistical signals associated with so-called "X"-factors: environments, racism, and the "hereditarian hypothesis"". Biology & Philosophy. 30 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9428-0. ISSN 0169-3867. S2CID 85351431.
  147. Panofsky, Aaron; Dasgupta, Kushan; Iturriaga, Nicole (2021). "How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 175 (2): 387–398. doi:10.1002/ajpa.24150. ISSN 0002-9483. PMC 9909835. PMID 32986847. he claims that genetics defines racial groups and makes them different, that IQ and cultural differences among racial groups are caused by genes, and that racial inequalities within and between nations are the inevitable outcome of long evolutionary processes are neither new nor supported by science (either old or new).
  148. Lewontin, Richard C. (March 1970). "Race and Intelligence". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 26 (3): 2–8. Bibcode:1970BuAtS..26c...2L. doi:10.1080/00963402.1970.11457774. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 26 April 2021.
  149. Nevid 2014, p. 271.
  150. ^ Templeton 2001
  151. ^ "Intelligence research should not be held back by its past". Nature. 545 (7655): 385–386. 25 May 2017. Bibcode:2017Natur.545R.385.. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22021. PMID 28541341. S2CID 4449918.
  152. Bird, Kevin A. (2 February 2021). "No support for the hereditarian hypothesis of the Black–White achievement gap using polygenic scores and tests for divergent selection". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 175 (2): 465–476. doi:10.1002/ajpa.24216. ISSN 0002-9483. PMID 33529393. Retrieved 1 November 2024 – via Wiley Online Library.
  153. Carson, Michael; Beckwith, Jon (2001). 'Race', IQ and Genes. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0005689.pub3. ISBN 978-0-470-01590-2.
  154. Beckwith, Jon; Morris, Corey A. (December 2008). "Twin Studies of Political Behavior: Untenable Assumptions?". Perspectives on Politics. 6 (4): 785–791. doi:10.1017/S1537592708081917. ISSN 1541-0986. S2CID 55630117.
  155. Kamin, Leon J.; Goldberger, Arthur S. (February 2002). "Twin Studies in Behavioral Research: A Skeptical View". Theoretical Population Biology. 61 (1): 83–95. Bibcode:2002TPBio..61...83K. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2001.1555. ISSN 0040-5809. PMID 11895384.
  156. Moore & Shenk 2016.
  157. Mackenzie 1984
  158. Deary, Johnson & Houlihan 2009
  159. ^ Block 2002
  160. Rushton & Jensen 2005.
  161. Flynn, J.R. (1999). "Searching for justice: the discovery of IQ gains over time" (PDF). American Psychologist. 54: 5–9. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.1.5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 June 2010. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  162. Flynn, James R. (2010). "The spectacles through which I see the race and IQ debate" (PDF). Intelligence. 38 (4): 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.001. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-07. Retrieved 2011-02-18.
  163. Flynn, James R.; te Nijenhuis, Jan; Metzen, Daniel (2014). "The g beyond Spearman's g: Flynn's paradoxes resolved using four exploratory meta-analyses" (PDF). Intelligence. 44: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.009.
  164. ^ Mackintosh 2011, p. 337.
  165. ^ Weinberg, Scarr & Waldman 1992
  166. Scarr & Weinberg 1976.
  167. Loehlin 2000, p. 185.
  168. Scarr & Weinberg 1990.
  169. Loehlin 2000, p. 187.
  170. Frydman and Lynn (1989). "The intelligence of Korean children adopted in Belgium". Personality and Individual Differences. 10 (12): 1323–1325. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90246-8.
  171. Thomas, Drew (2017). "Racial IQ Differences among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact?". Journal of Intelligence. 5 (1): 1. doi:10.3390/jintelligence5010001. PMC 6526420. PMID 31162392.
  172. Bryc et al. 2009
  173. Loehlin 2000.
  174. Templeton 2001.
  175. Sheppard & Vernon 2008.
  176. ^ Jensen 2006
  177. Nisbett 2009
  178. Nisbett 2009, pp. 221–2.
  179. Deary, Penke & Johnson 2010.
  180. McDaniel 2005.
  181. Ho et al. 1980.
  182. MacEachern 2006.
  183. Gray & Thompson 2004
  184. Ceci & Williams 2009
  185. ^ Rose, Steven (2009). "Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit". Nature. 457 (7231): 786–788. Bibcode:2009Natur.457..786R. doi:10.1038/457786a. PMID 19212384. S2CID 42846614.
  186. Flynn 2009b
  187. Jencks, Christopher; Phillips, Meredith. "The Black-White Test Score Gap". New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 October 2016. Retrieved 2 October 2016.
  188. Flynn 2008
  189. Olness 2003

Bibliography

Human intelligence topics
Types
Abilities, traits,
and constructs
Models and theories
Areas of research
Categories: