User talk:BlackHades: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:26, 17 February 2013 edit101.0.71.6 (talk) →R&I article ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 November 2020 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,381 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:BlackHades/Archive 1) (bot
(164 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
			\|maxarchivesize = 70K
			\|counter = 1
			\|minthreadsleft = 20
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\|algo = old(31d)
			\|archive = User talk:BlackHades/Archive %(counter)d
			}}
			{{archives}}

			==NPOV==
			A discussion here may interest you. ] (]) 08:55, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

	== ~~Welcome~~ ==		== New SPI ==
	{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}
	<!-- This comes from the template {{subst:W-screen}} -->
	<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; {{#ifeq:{{{clear}}}\|true\|\|border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: darkblue; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 25px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 25px;}}">
	<center><font size="+1" {{#ifeq:{{{clear}}}\|true\|\|color="white"}}>Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and <font color="orange">]</font></font>]</div>
	<div style="align: left; padding: 1em; {{#ifeq:{{{clear}}}\|true\|\|border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: white; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 25px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 25px;}}">
	''''']''''' I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to ]. As a first step, you may wish to read the ].

			]. ] (]) 07:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
	If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the ].

			== Please comment on ] ==
	-------
	Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to ]

			Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 6242 --> ] (]) 00:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
	<big> '''Finding your way around:''' </big>
	{{col-begin}}
	{{col-2}}
	* ''']'''
	{{col-2}}
	* ''']'''
	{{col-end}}

			== Please comment on ] ==
	<big> '''Need help?''' </big>
	{{col-begin}}
	{{col-2}}
	* ''']''' — a guide on where to ask questions.
	* ''']''' — quick reference on Misplaced Pages's mark-up codes.
	* ''']''' — an overview of Misplaced Pages's foundations
	{{col-2}}
	* ''']''' — a summary of Misplaced Pages's most important rules.
	*''']''' — A thorough step-by-step guide to Misplaced Pages.
	{{col-end}}

			Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 6829 --> ] (]) 00:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
	<big> '''How you can help:''' </big>
	{{col-begin}}
	{{col-2}}
	* ''']''' — a guide on how you can help.
	{{col-2}}
	* ''']''' — Misplaced Pages's hub of activity.
	{{col-end}}

			== Please comment on ] ==
	<big> '''Additional tips...''' </big>
	{{col-begin}}
	{{col-2}}
	* Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The ] button, on the tool bar above Misplaced Pages's text editing window, also does this.
	{{col-2}}
	* If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the ''''']''''' is for you.
	{{col-end}}

			Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in ]. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
	''{{BASEPAGENAME}}, '''good luck, and have fun.''''' {{#if:\|{{{sig}}}\|--] (]) 02:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div>

			For tips, please see {{section link\|Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment\|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 20670 --> ] (]) 00:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
	== IAASTD in GM food controversies article ==

			== Please comment on ] ==
	hey

			Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in ]. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
	I saw you deleted the paragraph on IAASTD. I took a quick look at the report and I think I agree that the cited page mischaracterizes it (seems that IAASTD took great pains to make a nuanced report, and the cited source makes it black and white toward sustainable practices.. but I suggest you open a section in Talk on the GM food controversies page and present that.. if you don't I might do it. It's an interesting report -- thanks at least for calling my attention to it by deleting reference to it! ] (]) 22:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
	:The cited article was just one person's interpretation of the IAASTD report. Moses Kiggundu Muwanga from the board member of "International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements". While the IAASTD report doesn't exactly give the most favorable outlook on GMO, it doesn't ever make the conclusions asserted by Muwanga. The IAASTD report was also heavily criticized by the scientific journals "Nature" (Off the rails. Nature Biotechnology 26: 247) and "Science" (Dueling visions for a hungry world. Science 319: 1474-76). ] (]) 11:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

			For tips, please see {{section link\|Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment\|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 21456 --> ] (]) 00:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
	== RE: Why are you reverting my edit? ==

			== ] ==
	Because there were other stat changes that other IP editors had done that hadn't been corrected, it was nothing against what you did, I was just bringing back the stats that were there before the vandals starting messing with the table. – ] <small>(] • ])</small> 20:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

			Hi,<br>
	== February 2013 ==
			You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 -->

			== ] ==
	To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
	:Completely false. I've made repeated attempts at discussion. In both the user talk page and in the talk page in the article. So I'm edit warring but the other user is not?...(bewildered). ] (]) 07:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

			Hi,<br>
	::Yes. You've made 3 reverts (restoring deleted material is a revert). The other editor made 2 (we count a series of reverts with no other users in between as one). So yes, you've hit 3RR and are at risk of being blocked. And 3RR is not an entitlement, you can't assume you can revert again with impunity and in fact will almost certainly be blocked if you continue. See the statement below. ] (]) 10:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
			You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
	:::Apparently it's clear that administrators are above the rules of wikipedia and ] does not apply to them and can POV push with impunity. If that's the case, it's a clear example that the Misplaced Pages Project is a failure. ] (]) 22:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 -->

			== Please comment on ] ==
	== You are reverting an article which is covered by Arbcom sanctions ==

			The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 55383 --> ] (]) 04:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
	{{Ivmbox
	\| image = yes
	\| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page.

			== Please comment on ] ==
	Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} -->
	\| valign = center
	\| ]
	}} I recommend that you wait for consensus before making any more controversial changes at ]. Note the suggestions for editor behavior given in the Arbcom alert box at the top of ]. Thank you, ] (]) 06:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
	:There's been no consensus for KillerChihuahua to remove these huge chunks of ] information. In fact, for many of these removal, he's the only one. And is very clear POV pushing that is in violation of ] and ArbCom. ] (]) 23:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

			The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 56166 --> ] (]) 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
	== Request ==

			== ]: Voting now open! ==
	Would you kindly move your comments at ] to below mine? If you'll place something along the lines of "Comment on item I." before each of your edits it will be much easier to respond. Thank you very much. {{mdash}} ] (]) 22:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
	:On second thought, never mind. Your addition of sections is a good idea. I'll just copy my sig to each. {{mdash}} ] (]) 22:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
	::Never never mind, looks like other would rather keep it linear. Sorry for the craziness. ] (]) 22:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
	I've cleaned it up. In the future, please place your posts ''after'' the post you're addressing, and not ''within'' someone else's post. ]] 23:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

			{{Ivmbox\|Hello, BlackHades. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
	== Personalized section headings ==

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Would you please change the section headings on the talk page to remove references to specific editors, especially associating editors with misconduct. Per the ], you should not name editors in these headings and the heading should be neutrally worded. It does happen and I did it myself, this reasonably inhibits collegial and civil discourse. I have altered the more recent one, but you should retitle the other two that name specific editors.--] <sub>] ]</sub> 23:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
	:Sure thing. ] (]) 23:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
	::I've reverted the changes. I see no reason to sweep this under the rug and pretend BlackHades has not been personally attacking me, commenting on me and not the content, especially since he's still doing it. Removing my name from the headers accomplishes nothing except a pretense such attacks did not exist. One puppy's opinion. ]] 03:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
	:::No one is trying to sweep anything. Personally attacking you? You removing scientific consensus from the article is POV pushing. Everyone can see it. You're being informed what wikipedia rule you're breaking. It's not a personal attack. ] (]) 05:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
	::You should, however, cease your attacks and focus on content moving forward. ]] 03:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
	:::Maybe some of us just want everyone to get along.--] <sub>] ]</sub> 04:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
	::::KC, you should be following your own advice. ] (])

			If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
	== You must have missed my notice ==
			\|Scale of justice 2.svg\|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/35&oldid=750625368 -->

			== Please comment on ] ==
	At the top of the page, editors are instructed to '''*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.''' In bold. It is also on my editnotice. In bold. Twice now you have failed to do so, and just like my notice says, I have removed those posts. I am asking you to cease wasting your time and effort and mine, and heed this. Post on the article talk page. Do not post about content on my talk page. Puppy has spoken; puppy is done. ]] 21:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
	:It's ALREADY been talked through on the talk page. There's never been any objection for this text except for you. This is clear ]. Stop wasting time with this POV push. Let it go. This is not your personal article. ] (]) 21:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

			The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 77282 --> ] (]) 04:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
	== R&I article ==

			== Please comment on ] ==
	You should calm down and avoid snapping at KC or other editors. There is no reason whatsoever to believe there has been meatpuppetry. All the editors involved are regulars in the topic area as far as I know so their involvement is not unusual. Please remain open to discussion, even if it means going over old issues. One doesn't necessarily have to go over every last detail again if it has already been discussed, but you should be willing to at least explain why previous discussions reached certain decisions.--] <sub>] ]</sub> 01:30, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
	:Some are regulars. Some aren't. I'm not saying everyone is involved in meatpuppetry or even most. But there's definitely strong suspicion for a couple people. For now, I'll take a wait and see approach. I'll present all the evidence when it's time. ] (]) 01:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
	::I have looked at all the involved editors and I see plenty of reason to believe they got there normally. There is no good reason to think otherwise, certainly not with those who are contributing most heavily to the discussion.--] <sub>] ]</sub> 02:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

			The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 78158 --> ] (]) 04:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
	I'm becoming suspicious about this idea also, particularly regarding Dougweller. Is he a "regular" on this article? There do not seem to be any comments by him in the recent archives, yet he knows far more about the early history of these disputes than someone legitimately new to the topic would know. ] (]) 21:57, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
	:He's an administrator who is active on ], where many of these disputes wind up. ] (]) 02:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

			{{Ivmbox\|Hello, BlackHades. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	::I've been active in the case of socks of Mikemikev - sock puppetry is one of my pet peeves, to put it mildly. This guy is a really abusive sock - abusing both articles and editors. The article has been on my watchlist for years, it's just not one that I like getting involved with, partially due to all the conflicts. I've only edited the article twice, in August 2009 (info like this is linked on the history page, easy to find), and the talk page once in the past about two years ago to remind people this is under ArbCom sanctions, so my recent edit on socks & banned editors is in line with that. A bit ironic that the comment is from an IP address with only one edit. ] (]) 06:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
	:::I'm not a new user, I have a dynamic IP. I've been participating in the talk page discussions from other IPs in the same range. As you don't like to get involved in the article, what motivated you to suddenly begin participating at the same time as a few others with similar viewpoints, and post about history from ca. two year ago? I noticed the RockKnocker and GTZing socks, but both were blocked before they caused very much harm, so I don't get the impression this is worse now than at any other time. ] (]) 10:31, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
	::::Ah, sorry, I apologise. Of course you are the one with the dynamic IP. The article's on my watchlist. I'd been observing and finally decided to chip in when I was KC's edit on the 7th. It may well not be any worse than any other time, it's always had problems and once in a while people need reminding. ] (]) 11:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	What's very curious is that Dougweller's post on R&I talk is not actually summarising the history of the dispute. Rather, it is parroting some of the same tiresome accusations Mathsci has been repeating for about two years and which have not been accepted by arbitrators. See and for two attempts by Mathsci to insert his claims about "proxy-editing" into the findings of fact, and particularly how arbitrators reacted to those attempts. One cannot help but wonder, given Dougweller's ideas are not founded in an arbitration ruling, where did they originate? Perhaps the answer lies with his little Freudian slip in the edit summary . <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	:@BlackHades: The above post is obviously from a banned user who is seeking to exploit our disagreements to inject drama. Would you please remove it from this page, and remove my message as well, thanks. I saw it some hours ago and felt I should remove it, but I've been busy elsewhere and also didn't want to add to the drama myself. Some editors support the retention of all comments but in case you are not aware, some arbitrators have expressed a strong view that removal is best (particularly in the context of the subject matter and the named editor, both of which have been discussed at tedious length on several occasions at ] pages. ] (]) 04:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
			If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
	::Please don't remove it, I would like to see Dougweller's response to these points. I assumed his post on the article talk page was only a summary of past arbitration decisions, but it's apparent now that it wasn't. As per the two linked discussions on arbitration pages, Dougweller's post was a summary of how arbitration decisions were interpreted by one person, whose attempts to amend the findings of fact in accordance with that interpretation were unsuccessful. If Dougweller's familiarity with the article's history were only because he watched it for a long time, I would expect his summary to have been of the actual arbitration decisions, not of one person's interpretation of those decisions which did not receive much support from arbitrators. Dougweller, what is the reason for this? ] (]) 05:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
			\|Scale of justice 2.svg\|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=813406680 -->

			== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

			{{Ivmbox\|Hello, BlackHades. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

			If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
			\|Scale of justice 2.svg\|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=866997930 -->

			== Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment ==

			{{tmbox
			\| image = none
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = background-color: #ffffff;
			\| text = Your feedback is requested{{^}} ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- User:Yapperbot/FRS notification -->
			}} Message delivered to you with love by ] :) Is this wrong? Contact ]. Sent at 08:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

			== Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment ==

			]Your feedback is requested{{^}} ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- User:Yapperbot/FRS notification --> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) \| Is this wrong? Contact ]. \| Sent at 14:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

			== Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment ==

			]Your feedback is requested at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) \| Is this wrong? Contact ]. \| Sent at 05:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

			== Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment ==

			]Your feedback is requested at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) \| Is this wrong? Contact ]. \| Sent at 05:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

			== You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service ==

			'''Hi BlackHades!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over three years.

			In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

			'''You do not need to do anything about this''' - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

			# Go to the ].
			# Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the ] and/or ] headings.
			# Paste {{tlx\|1=Frs user\|2=BlackHades\|3=''limit''}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where ''limit'' is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
			# Publish the page.

			If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

			Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

			If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on ], or on ]. '''Thank you!'''
			Message delivered to you with love by ] :) \| Is this wrong? Contact ]. \| Sent at 18:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 November 2020

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 20 sections are present.

NPOV

A discussion here may interest you. SpaceBobber (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

New SPI

Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Allthekidsinthestreet. Dougweller (talk) 07:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Auditory hallucination

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Auditory hallucination. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Autism

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Autism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Please comment on Talk:Female genital mutilation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Female genital mutilation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2014 Oso mudslide

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2014 Oso mudslide. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BlackHades. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Red panda

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red panda. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:?Oumuamua

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:?Oumuamua. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BlackHades. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BlackHades. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Occupational stress on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bengal tiger on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Rocketry on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Devi Sridhar on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi BlackHades! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
Paste {{Frs user|BlackHades|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)