User talk:Kendrick7: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:14, 27 February 2013 editBeeblebrox (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators113,504 edits →Once more with feeling: accept for some crazy reason← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 14:39, 4 January 2025 edit undoMinorax (talk \| contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers191,851 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of File:Palestine peace not apartheid.jpg.Tag: Twinkle
(320 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{not around\|3=16 May 2021}}
	{{Tutnum III}}
			{{Tutnum IV}}
	{\| class="infobox" width="150"		{\| class="infobox" width="150"
	\|- align="center"		\|- align="center"
Line 25:		Line 26:
	\|- align="center"		\|- align="center"
	\| ]		\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
	\|}		\|}
	{\| class="messagebox" style="background: SkyBlue;"		{\| class="messagebox" style="background: SkyBlue;"
Line 30:		Line 39:
	\|}		\|}

			== ] of ] ==
	== Holy Land Map ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	''"A 1759 map entitled The Holy Land, or Palestine, showing not only the Ancient Kingdoms of Judah and Israel in which the 12 Tribes have been distinguished, but also their placement in different periods as indicated in the Holy Scriptures by Tobias Conrad Lotter, Geographer. Augsburg, Germany"''
			<blockquote>'''Only passing mentions, no significant coverage that I could find.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	I can't understand Latin, so I was wondering if you could shed some light on a particular point regarding this map. I'm particularly interested in the phrase, "also their placement in different periods as indicated in the Holy Scriptures". Does the Map give an indication of any specific date(s) that it is supposed to depict?

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Also, just out of interest regarding your last comment on the talk page, are you aware of any other articles that present a similar fanciful Map in a section dedicated to the actual history of a region. Thanks, ] (]) 10:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
	== ] of ] ==
	]

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
	The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
			==] nomination of ]==
	:'''Subject is not a notable politician, military officer or diplomat. Fails WP:POLITICIAN; WP:MILNG; WP:MILPEOPLE; WP:DIPLOMAT; WP:NRVE. Five bedroom bedroom B&B built by descendant of notable person seems more WP:SOAP.'''
			]
			{{Quote box\|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>\|width=20%\|align=right}}
			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a ], at ]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Christopher+Heinz\|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-repost-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="color:DarkGray">...</span> ] <sub>]</sub> 17:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
	While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

			==Disambiguation link notification for September 27==
	You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
	Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
			:]<!-- ( \| )-->
	== Grasping at straws listed at ] ==
			::added a link pointing to ]
	]
			:]<!-- ( \| )-->
	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Grasping at straws'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> '''<font face="Century Gothic" style="text-shadow:1px 1px 3px #999;">] <small>]</small>''' 17:57, 25 Apr 2012 (UTC)</font> 17:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
			::added a link pointing to ]

			(].) --] (]) 10:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
	== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

			== Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion ==
	<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ].The discussion is about the topic ].<!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Thank you. ] <small>(please ] on reply)</small> 01:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
	The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 00:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 04:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
	== RfD about redirect you changed ==

			== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
	Hi, there's currently an RfD going on about ], which you {{diff\|WP:ESSAY\|129636117\|128805636\|retargeted}}, but I can't understand why you chose to do that. If you could comment on the issue, it would be helpful. --'''''<font color="red">]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''''' @191, i.e. 03:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	== Why I reverted your changes to ] ==
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2020\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Your math is just plain wrong. Dividing 6585.3213 / 18 tells us nothing about the period of the saros. You have to multiply the difference you found by 18 to get the correct figure. The correct calculation is 6585.3213/365.242199 (one year) which indeed yields 18 years 11 days. As I did a reversion you will need to re-insert the info about the Antikythera(sp?) mechanism. Thanks. --] (]) 13:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
	== About ] ==
			</td></tr>
	See .--] (]) 08:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
			</table>
	:And . And I'm apparently a ].--] (]) 11:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->
	::My apologies. I was unaware that you had no ]. I shan't bother you further.--] (]) 10:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== ] ==
			<blockquote>'''Does not meet ]'''</blockquote>
	Hello. In March of 2010 you edited ] and included a sentence that reads "''The relevance to a direction stated at the beginning of a situation has no bearing to the outcome.''" Could you clarify that sentence, please? I don't understand what you were trying to say in that article. Thank you. ] (]) 07:12, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	== internal logic listed at ] ==
	]
	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''internal logic'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote -->

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	It has been kept, although I do not see any good reason for it on the RfD page. What is your opinion? You said, it should be replaced by some kind of stub for the non-mathematical meaning. And before there is a stub? Regards --] (]) 13:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
	==Random IP troll==
			== ] of ] ==
	Keep your politics off Misplaced Pages, please, OK? Wiki isn't for your political positions on groups, it's for facts. Taking a position on the validity of their message is not what Wiki is about.
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	==Well Done!==
			<blockquote>'''Does not meet ] as notability is not inherited from author.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	] You have been awarded the '''Super Manliness Award''' for helping to construct a great encyclopedia.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	== A bowl of strawberries for you! ==

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Hey whats up hope you have a great time ] (]) 22:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

			== "Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS" listed at ] ==
	== Some stroopwafels for you! ==
			]
			A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> —] (] '''·''' ]) 18:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Hey Kendrick 7 ] (]) 23:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
	\|}
	== ] of ] ==
	<!--<includeonly>}}</includeonly>-->
	Hello, Kendrick7. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, ], for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	#
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2021\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	# remove the text that looks like this: <tt><nowiki>{{proposed deletion/dated...}}</nowiki></tt>
	# save the page

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Also, ''be sure to explain why'' you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on ]. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

			If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
	You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. Thanks, ] (]) 18:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
			</td></tr>
	== Deletion discussion about ] ==
			</table>
	Hello, Kendrick7,
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 -->
			== "New Catechism" listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 01:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Chad_Kolton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at ].

	If you're new to the process, ] is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on ]. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

	Thanks, ] (]) 18:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

	==Talkback==
	{{talkback\|Malik Shabazz\|Dealing with young editors\|ts=02:11, 17 August 2012 (UTC)}}

	== Hilarious ==

	I must say was hilarious, especially how he tried to clean it up, apparently not knowing there would be a diff.--] (]) 03:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

	==Disambiguation link notification for August 19==

	Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] \| ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 04:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

	== A Barnstar for you! ==

	{\| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
	\|rowspan="2" valign="top" \| {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}\|alt\|]\|]}}

	\|rowspan="2" \|
	\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" \| '''The Current Events Barnstar'''
	\|-
	\|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" \| Thanks for creating the OPSEC article. It was needed and timely! ]-] 06:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

	== A cupcake for you! ==

	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Hey Kendrick7, in Misplaced Pages could you get like an avatar of yourself like a picture. Do you have any articles you need me too edit or add on to? Oh and thanks for the kitten here is a cupcake. ] (]) 23:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

	== Some baklava for you! ==

	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Exactly HOW am I suppose to create my user page I want a step of directions. ] (]) 23:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

	== A beer for you! ==

	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Or a six-pack if you need it. ] (]) 03:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

	== A cup of tea for you! ==

	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| What I am saying is I need a set of directions from you for how to decorate my user page, ] (]) 21:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

	== I can't just do that ==

	And yet I just did. ] -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
	:Consider this a "final" warning, if you restore the page again you will be blocked. ] (]) 13:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
	::Consider this a second final warning against restoring the page. ] (]) 21:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

	== Why did you do this? ==

	Why did you do when the result of the AfD was Delete? This is not the correct protocol for overturning a result that you did not agree. ] (]) 03:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

	:I have reported your continued disregard of the AfD . ] (]) 04:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

	== A barnstar for you! ==

	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" \| '''The Admin's Barnstar'''
	\|-
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| You have a moral compass and a keen nose for trickery. You also have the willingness to do the right thing, regardless. I commend you. ] (]) 05:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}
	:I'm confused.

	:"Description: The Admin's Barnstar may be awarded to administrators who made a particularly difficult decision, did a tiresome but needed admin task, cleared some nasty backlog or just to show an administrator that you think they are doing good work in a particular area of "the job" and that their work is appreciated. To be used when other, more specific, barnstars do not apply to the reasons at hand."
	:] (]) 07:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

	== A cheeseburger for you! ==

	{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
	\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Could you help me delete my profile in wikipedia? Is there any delete button? I need a set of directions from YOU to tell me how to delete my profile becaus I do not want to be a member anymore. ] (]) 21:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
	\|}

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
	== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ]<sup><small style="font-size:80%;">(])</small></sup> 02:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
			== "Heavies" listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 03:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

			== ] of ] ==
	<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
			<blockquote>'''Sources do not establish ] is met'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	==Disambiguation link notification for September 23==

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] \| ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

	It's OK to ~~remove~~ ~~this~~ ~~message.~~ ~~Also,~~ to ~~stop~~ ~~receiving~~ ~~these~~ ~~messages,~~ ~~follow~~ ~~these~~ ]. Thanks, ] (]) 14:51, 23 ~~September~~ ~~2012~~ (UTC)		'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 09:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11#According to John}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 07:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15#The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 2#Hamas militants}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
	== September 2012 ==
			== "]" listed at ] ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28#Job creators}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

			== ] of ] ==
	To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> – ] (]) 03:53, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	] You currently appear to be engaged in an ] according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
			<blockquote>'''Fails ]. No extensive coverage, google news yields only 2 sources.'''</blockquote>
	Please be particularly aware, ] states:
	# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
	# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
	If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew -->  — ] (]) 03:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	==Blocked==
	<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for contravening Misplaced Pages's ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx\|" code. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. v/r - ]] 04:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-bioblock -->
	:Should another admin see fit to accept any unblock request, I suggest they place this user under a topic ban from 2012 Presidential Campaign articles per ].--v/r - ]] 04:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=this is plainly ridiculous. All I've done is try to improve the encyclopedia by adding content \| decline=You have edit-warred to attempt to insert a huge chunk of information deemed by other editors to give undue weight to one particular issue in a BLP. No successful unblock request ever started with "the others are wrong" and this will not be an exception. ] (]) 04:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)}}
	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=This is a joke. I'm being blocked for adding information to the project per ]\|decline = You've also ] and ], ignored ], tried to ], displayed ] in ] people who hold different opinions that you do ], etc. etc. Would it be that all you did here was try to add content. It was the manner in which you behaved in the process of trying to do so that is the reason for your block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, I would suggest choosing different actions, preferably ones that involve discussion and treating other editors and Misplaced Pages processes with respect. ]''''']''''' 04:12, 25 September 2012 (UTC)}}
	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=That is all nonsense. Consensus can't override our fundamental mission of being ]. I will revert vandalism until my dying breath. How else to explain this? \| decline=I'd give a laundry list of reasons why this was declined, but Drmies and Jayron32 already have. As you're clearly ], don't understand how Misplaced Pages works (per your "Consensus doesn't matter" statement), and either can't or won't tell what is vandalism from ], instead posting three unblock requests that continue to insist that you've done nothing wrong, refuse to consider the mere possibility that you have, and promise continued disruption if unblocked, your talk page access has been revoked for the duration of this block. Further appeals may be sent to ] at {{nospam\|arbcom-appeals-en\|lists.wikimedia.org}}. ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 04:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)}}
	*There was no vandalism. You've been here long enough that you should know that, just as you should know that consensus is the name of the game. Keep playing the "joke/nonsense/plainly ridiculous" card and you'll never get unblocked; the next administrator can always decide to block talk page access since all you're doing is digging a deeper hole for yourself. ] (]) 04:28, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
	**Funny you should mention that in the {{ec}}. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 04:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
	*{{ec\|2}} Then I regret to inform you that I'll have to block you "until your dying breath". Extended to indef, and talk page access revoked. ] (]) 04:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
	<div class="notice" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for ]. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact ] at ''{{NoSpam\|arbcom-appeals-en\|lists.wikimedia.org}}''. ] (]) 04:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blocknotalk -->
	::"Indefinite" is a pretty long time. Perhaps we could put a finite expiration contingent to a topic ban on election-related articles. ] (]) 05:07, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
	:::"Indefinite" isn't any specific time at all, neither long nor short. It is simply until the editor makes a convincing unblock request, eg via ] or ] - it could be tomorrow. -- ] (]) 05:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	Kendrick, I understand why you want some of this material in the article, but edit-warring isn't going to get you there. For that matter, now that you're blocked, insisting that you're going to edit war the moment you get unblocked will only delay that moment indefinitely. I'd like you to agree to 1RR on political articles and request an unblock on that basis. Not only is this better than an indefinite block, it gives you the chance to make your case on the article talk page. Perhaps with some changes to the text and some improved citations, some of what you want is possible. But it's only possible if you put aside your anger and agree to stop edit-warring. ] (]) 07:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
	:I restored your talk page access so that you can log into this account and make one final unblock request. ] (]) 14:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

			'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
	== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

			==] nomination of ]==
	<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
			]
			{{Quote box\|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>\|width=20%\|align=right}}
			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ].

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Hurt+Hardy\|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> ] (]) 23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
	The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
			<blockquote>'''Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:CRIME'''</blockquote>
	== American occupation of Iraq listed at ] ==
	]
	An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''American occupation of Iraq'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 07:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	== Once more with feeling ==

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	{{unblock reviewed \| 1= OK ], I confess: I did a horrible thing back in September by restoring deleted edits created by other editors about ], who, we can all agree, is just some shlub and not even close to being a public figure, and as such my ] lifetime ban is entirely fair. It won't happen again, cross my heart and hope to die. I think I speak for the collective peoples of the world when I say: ''Mitt Romney who?'' Upon this anniversary of Misplaced Pages, how about we just bury the hatchet? Blocks aren't supposed to be punitive and before this ugly incident I was an editor in good standing for nearly 8 years running, on and off. Have I been a zealot for ] and ]? Well, yes, but someone has to be. Let's just grow into being better editors and move on, OK? -- ]<sup>]</sup> 03:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC) \| decline=Oh how wise: appealing a BLP block with a violation of our BLP policy built right in. Clearly you're not ready to move on, so I'm satisfied that this block continues to meet its purpose of protecting the encyclopedia (]''']''']) 12:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)}}
	{{unblock reviewed\|I'm sorry, what? I've been incredibly patient in doing my time out -- I've been blocked for 4 months now. Making a joke about the ]'s fate in the ] is hardly a ] violation, but I might suppose that such is the mentality behind my indef block in the first place. Can please I get an admin around here to ], as opposed to the handful that are apparently ] me? Having been with the project lo these many years, although mostly editing as an IP, I just want to enjoy the ten year anniversary of the project as a ]. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
	\|decline=If you are going to be unblocked, you need to convince a reviewing admin that the behavior that resulted in the block will not reoccur. Making jokes about a BLP subject in your unblock request does not inspire confidence, and seems similar to your previous unblock requests where you simply ignored the reasons why you were blocked. ]] 03:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)}}
	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Look, I am happy to admit that merging ] back to the ] article constituted a ] violation, and I absolutely regret my behavior. I didn't even read the material prior to the merge, but still, I was neither warned, nor in any other way informed that such a merge might constitute grounds for an indefinite block before it occurred. ] lives, at least for tax purposes, just a few miles down the road from me. I will go to his home on my hands and knees and apologize profusely, that for a mere few minutes, my edits existed and may have painted him in a bad light during the recent presidential campaign. I would rather that Misplaced Pages forgive me for my sin, given my many years of otherwise good service to the project. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 5:25 am, Today (UTC+0) \| decline=Your continued sarcasm does nothing to convince me that you take the BLP policy seriously - quite the reverse, in fact. Looking over your previous appeals, I see this has been a continuing issue; unless your next appeal demonstrates a serious shift in attitude, you are likely to find your access to even this talkpage being revoked. ] ]&zwj;] 08:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)}}
	*You were warned, at least twice, about edit-warring, and told that continuing could get you blocked - your not understanding that such a block might be indefinite is no excuse for ignoring those warnings and carrying on. So, I'd say you need to knock off this passing part of the blame on to other people for your own poor behaviour. And all this sarcastic "''I will go to his home on my hands and knees...''" nonsense is just making you sound like a petulant teenager - I wouldn't unblock you while you continue with this attitude. -- ] (]) 07:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
	{{unblock reviewed\|Again, in all my years with the project, I've never heard of an indef block for edit warring, and if that is all I'm actually guilty of, this block remains ridiculous.

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
	I've likewise never heard of an indef block being meted out after 15 minutes of discussion of an AN/I thread during which the person accused didn't even get an opportunity to even defend themselves. When exactly did we become barbarians? An indef block used to be a serious deal.
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	And I don't understand why the other admin thinks I'm making a joke about living a few miles from ], who like myself resides in or around ], and is the person I supposedly ] violated during the ]; check my IP. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 09:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)\|decline=Per the comment below. After seven years and a a block history almost a page long, you can't even be said to be fresh out of good faith. You've been ''long'' out of good faith. In fact, I would daresay that you've ] as well. -- ] (]) 16:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)}}
	:I'm confused: we permablock edit warriors regularly, so claiming you haven't heard of it sounds weird. Edit warring is no different from any other blockable offence: first, you tend to get short blocks, then they escalate until the last one becomes an indef. ] (]) 10:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
	{{unblock\|Oh, please. My previous block was nearly 3 years prior to this one. Three years of good behavior is nearly half of my time editing on the project with a {{unblock reviewed \| 1=Oh, please. My previous block was nearly 3 years prior to this one. Three years of good behavior is nearly half of my time editing on the project with a ], so this is hardly a case of escalating blocks; that the length of my current block was actively ]'d over makes my block list look far longer than it truly is. Again, ]. I've served my time since this this September 2012 block. ] is moot. Were the same editors, who felt I was mistaken in trying to provide our readers with more than passing information about ], to put the entire campaign article up for deletion at this time, I would not lift a finger to stop them. It's upon the ], as I said above. What possible harm would I do now on the matter? None. I no longer care. I can not imagine caring at any future date. I've been thoroughly punished and am thoroughly repentant. Having fallen behind now with 6 months worth of edits -- none of which relate to current events or politics -- horrifies me. This block is also cramping my style at Wikisource. If I can't find an admin who will unblock me soon, I don't know what I will do :( -- ]<sup>]</sup> 05:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC) \| accept=I don't know if you are aware of this, but you are ''really'' bad at making unblock requests. I am frankly surprised you were allowed to make so many. However, per the remarks below, this one is accepted in the spirit of ] and ], meaning you are being taken at your word that such behavior will nor be repeated, but also that you should be aware that you are pretty much "under the microscope" especially in the realm of BLP articles, which you should probably avoid entirely for a while until you have re-established yourself as a productive editor. Welcome back. ] (]) 18:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)}}
	*As the original blocking administrator, I think Kendrick gets the point by now even if he skates around it. I don't think our job is to break the guy until he submits to 'our rule' and I've got no issues with him being unblocked. Maybe a BLP topic ban would serve us better than a block.--v/r - ]] 14:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
	== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			== "]" listed at ] ==
	<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15#How the sausage gets made}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 19:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Misplaced Pages having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
	The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-redundantimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> --]<sup>«¦]¦»</sup> 14:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
	Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] <small>(])</small> 17:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:39, 4 January 2025

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Kendrick7 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 16 May 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This editor is a **Tutnum of the Encyclopedia** and is entitled to display this **Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, and Chewed Broken Pencil**.

Archive
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Proposed deletion of Edward Adam

The article Edward Adam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only passing mentions, no significant coverage that I could find.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christopher Heinz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christopher Heinz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Christopher Heinz. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 17:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Christopher Heinz

added a link pointing to Pittsburg

Henry J. Heinz

added a link pointing to Birmingham, Pennsylvania

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is White supremacy and the Proud Boys.The discussion is about the topic Proud Boys. Thank you. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 01:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Brighteon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brighteon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Brighteon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of COBRA (Joseph R. Rosenberger novel series)

The article COBRA (Joseph R. Rosenberger novel series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of COBRA (Timothy Zahn novel series)

The article COBRA (Timothy Zahn novel series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBOOK as notability is not inherited from author.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

"Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 23#Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"New Catechism" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect New Catechism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#New Catechism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rosemont Seneca Partners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemont Seneca Partners is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rosemont Seneca Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

AlexEng 02:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

"Heavies" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Heavies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#Heavies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Tzvetkoff

The article Daniel Tzvetkoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources do not establish WP:BIO is met

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

"According to John" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect According to John has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § According to John until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

"The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15 § The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy until a consensus is reached. Grorp (talk) 00:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

"Hamas militants" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hamas militants has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 2 § Hamas militants until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Six phases of a big project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Six phases of a big project is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Six phases of a big project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

"Job creators" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Job creators has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28 § Job creators until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Loïc Jean-Albert

The article Loïc Jean-Albert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. No extensive coverage, google news yields only 2 sources.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hurt Hardy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hurt Hardy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Proposed deletion of Hurt Hardy

The article Hurt Hardy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:CRIME

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Nomination of Hurt Hardy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurt Hardy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hurt Hardy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

GuyBanks (talk) 01:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

"How the sausage gets made" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect How the sausage gets made has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15 § How the sausage gets made until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (/_Edits) 19:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Palestine peace not apartheid.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Palestine peace not apartheid.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Misplaced Pages having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

Categories: