| Revision as of 19:01, 3 March 2013 editKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →Single-payer healthcare: add to the RFAR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:06, 30 September 2024 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,868 editsm Reverted edit by Problematic-usurnaim (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot IIITag: Rollback | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=February 2022}} | |||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | ||
| {{Administrator|number=1}} | <!--{{Administrator|number=1}}--> | ||
| {{OTRS topicon|number=2|extra_offset=2}} | {{OTRS topicon|number=2|extra_offset=2}} | ||
| {{User talk:KillerChihuahua/Header}} | {{User talk:KillerChihuahua/Header}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |maxarchivesize = 150K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 25 | ||
| |algo = old(14d) | |algo = old(14d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:KillerChihuahua/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:KillerChihuahua/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| __FORCETOC__ | |||
| {{cent}} | {{cent}} | ||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Apology, explanation of non-malicious intent, and description of resolve not to repeat offenses == | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 20 March 2023 == | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-03-20}} </div><!--Volume 19, Issue 6--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 11:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div> | |||
| I did have two accounts. I had set up one, then later, another with a name I preferred, but with no malicious intentions. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1144887209 --> | |||
| The purpose was not ever that one account would manufacture support for the other. I was not doing it to provide support for one account under another account name. The posting on the talk page using the other user name was by accident (as you can see by the use of first person pronouns in that comment) My purposes were not any of the ones listed as "innappropriate uses of alternative accounts." The appearance of such a misuse was an accident, where I believed I was writing under the appropriate account, but was accidently signed in under the other. My wish to maintain honesty was shown by the fact that after I realised I was signed in on the otehr account, I exited and signed in under the other to sign the post with the actual more honest name. | |||
| The whole thing was a mistake, but I truly did not do it with bad intentions. | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 03 April 2023 == | |||
| It should have been obvious that if I created a second account this could easily happen. I should have thought it through. | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-04-03}} </div><!--Volume 19, Issue 7--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 16:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC) </div></div> | |||
| I offer sincere apologies and emphasize that I will not repeat anything like this in the future. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Bri@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1147436351 --> | |||
| == Administrators' newsletter – April 2023 == | |||
| I do wish to add that the edits about the American Psychological Association, and the UK Royal College were in order to correct the factual innaccuracy that was and is present on those pages. If you would folllow the links I had read, and read the actual statements by those two organizations, you would see that is the case. This is not ideology, this is about the accurate description of what those two associations actually said. The APA said that there are so many different experiences, that a global statement may be misleading. http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/abortion/mental-health.pdf The Royal College explicitly said that the data is inconclusive. http://www.nccmh.org.uk/publications_SR_abortion_in_MH.html The current paragraphs on Wilkipedia are innaccurate. I trust, that you are a person of integrity who will take the time to go to the actual statements and reports by those two organizations and see that is the case. I hope that someone other than me will edit the page for greater acuracy. | |||
| ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 04:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ] from the past month (March 2023). | |||
| Look, you socked, then you lied about it. I sincerely do hope you don't do it again; but if you do someone is likely to block not only this account but all your accounts. Have one account and be done. And don't lie; next time there is a question people will be far less likely to believe you. Puppy has spoken. ]] 20:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| == I doubt you've seen this SPI about us == | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| ] '''Administrator changes''' | |||
| ]. ] (]) 10:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :] ] | |||
| :BlackHades managed to find an old failed proposal that said accusations of meatpuppetry should be made at SPI, but then devoted the whole thing to me. Now rev/del'd by another Admin. ] (]) 11:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :] ] | |||
| :Why on earth did they rev/del??? Also, pity I missed this. This is what happens when I take the weekend off, darnit. I miss the really weird and fun stuff. ]] 00:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| == Hi, could you help investigate a potential behavioral issue? == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hi, Killer. I have been of tendentious editing at ]. I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at my edits and telling me if I am in violation of Misplaced Pages behavioral policies. Thanks. — ] 21:53, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Ack, not tonight (EST) but I can in the morning. ]] 00:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :What a mess! Of course, the TPM article is a contentious article, and although I have considerable experience on contentious articles I don't think I have ever edited the TPM one. To which I'm inclined at this moment to add, Thank Goodness. It appears to me the charges against you spring more from the frustration the other editor feels over a content dispute than from any actual tendentious edits on your part. IMO, it is best for you to ignore the allegations and proceed with trying to discuss content. Then again, I'm the last person to block anyone for incivility and I rarely even bother if it is serious personal attacks; if the attacks are against me I don't recall ever blocking, or reporting. I find confronting this kind of hostility is difficult to do without escalating the situation. If the situation deteriorates, you may wish to ask another uninvolved admin for a second opinion. As a side note, I noticed a key bit of the content debate was whether to utilize content about something which did not mention the TPM. If a source can be found which ties the event to the TPM, it can be used in the article. Otherwise, it is OR and/or SYNTH to so use it, however "obvious" it may be to the editors of the article. | |||
| :You may wish to try a one line statement such as "I reject your allegations, and prefer to keep the topic here on content." and then be done, no matter how much more is said. If you wish, I will attempt a discussion with the other party regarding this. Let me know. ]] 16:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, I would appreciate your help. — ] 16:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok, I'll see what I can do. ]] 16:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Well, I tried, but it seems that although he has no compunction about posting paragraphs of vague accusations, including three posts to write and copyedit his to me, he can't be arsed to post even one diff, so I advised him to cease with the unsupported accusations. Let me (or another uninvolved admin) know if he starts it up again. ]] 20:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thank you very much for your help. — ] 20:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: You're welcome; I hope my efforts ''were'' helpful. ]] 20:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] '''CheckUser changes''' | |||
| == Notifications That You've Received a Message, if Not Written on *Your* Talk Page == | |||
| :] ] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| Hey, you "angry barking puppy," | |||
| ] '''Guideline and policy news''' | |||
| You recently put a notice on my talk page. I wanted to ask you here why it supposedly had to be you posting that, instead of just the supposed admin. who had already been talking to me. When and why did it supposedly become "your business"? | |||
| * A ] is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving ] should be referred to the ]. | |||
| ] '''Technical news''' | |||
| (But the one thing I'm grateful for about that is that the warning was present, rather than just taking action without one. So for that one thing, thanks.) | |||
| * Some older ]s will not be able to use ] on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of ]. ({{phab|T178356}}) | |||
| * The ] has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default. | |||
| * A link to the user's ] page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on ]. This was voted #17 in the ]. | |||
| ] '''Arbitration''' | |||
| But then I saw that you wanted us to post replies to the place where the original message was posted. Well, obviously you get a notification that someone has put a message on your talk page, and I get a notification that someone has put one on my page. But how would you get a notification that someone has responded to something you wrote on '''my''' page? You wouldn't just keep checking it and checking it every day for a long time, even if some time went without seeing a response there, would you? So that's my concern about keeping the messages lined up on the same page. Yes, it's definitely easier to follow. But the notification system isn't very good. Right? What's your remedy for that, and how do I get it too? | |||
| * The '']'' case has been closed. | |||
| * A case about ] has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023. | |||
| ---- | |||
| ] (]) 05:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{center|{{flatlist| | |||
| # If I see it, it's my business. I'm an admin. | |||
| * ] | |||
| # I watch your page. Learn how at ] ]] 13:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| == going back to the original ... == | |||
| }}}} | |||
| <!-- | |||
| "''Meatpuppet''" thing. Does this mean we can now refer to you as "Mrs. Weller"? baahaahaa. <''Newspaper across the rump, and puppy-Ched yelps and looks for a table to hide under''> — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 14:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| -->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)</small>}} | |||
| :Wow, you just insulted me, my r/l husband, Doug, and <s>hen-pecked</s> husbands everywhere. Oh wait... do you speak from experience? There, there.... just because ''you're'' whipped doesn't mean you aren't ''valued''. ]] 14:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Dreamy Jazz@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1146829295 --> | |||
| :: ;-D ... Wait. You're ''r/l'' husband's name is Doug too? OH MY - I do so love irony in life. Actually I did marry very young, but divorced in the late 70s. I've come close to a second try a couple times over the years, but it just never seemed work out. I would like the chance to be a <s>hen-pecked</s> good husband again, but with each passing year I figure it's less likely to happen. Personally I very much admire a strong and intelligent woman (must also have a great sense of humor; given my twisted way of thinking), so being "whipped" wouldn't really be a problem. (I have selective hearing issues anyway .. lol) Anyway - please convey to Mr. Chihuahua that I meant no offense. Have a good one KC. Cheers and "woof" — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 14:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| :::No, you turkey, you insulted my r/l husband ''and'' Doug, not my r/l husband Doug. :-P Sorry your attempt to become hen-pecked didn't work out for you. :-( Mr.Chihuahua doesn't do Misplaced Pages, so he'll never even know you insulted him AND called him "Doug". So all is well. ]] 15:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| ::::I did a double-take on "your husband Doug" as well...which was especially puzzling, since I know someone who claims to be your r/l husband, and his name's not Doug :) ] (]) 15:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 17:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(60deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| == Respond == | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi KillerChihuahua! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, hey. :) I ], but i didnt want to be too broad about this, as it is mostly unrelated to the request in question. Anyway, all best... --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 19:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society == | |||
| == SuzanneOlson == | |||
| ] Dear {{PAGENAME}}, | |||
| Hi, the close clearly states "article edits" i.e. talk pages are OK. If they become disruptive then we can re-raise at ANI and look to spread the topic ban further. Regards, ]] 20:37, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Excellent, that's how I read it, and that's what I said on her talk page. Just wanted to verify. Thanks - ]] 20:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Nado158 == | |||
| Dear Killer, please wait. Please see also my opinion (and please read my all my comments above and check it). I think that I not deserve such hard punishment. Regards--] (]) 14:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| # I've read all your comments. | |||
| # You should keep your discussion about this on ] and not here. | |||
| # This isn't about "punishing" you; it is about protecting the encyclopedia. | |||
| ]] 14:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == AE Nado158 == | |||
| With regard to the exact parameters of the proposed topic ban, please see my comment at ]. --] (]) 15:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :The parameters are already set by ARBMAC; ''The disputes presented in this case, while focusing specifically on issues related to Macedonia, are part of a broader set of conflicts prevalent over the entire range of articles concerning the Balkans; see, for example, the Dalmatia case and the ] case. Many of these conflicts are grounded in matters external to Misplaced Pages, including long-standing historical, national, and ethnic disputes in the region. The area of conflict in this case shall therefore be considered to be the entire set of Balkan-related articles, broadly interpreted.'' - Kosovo includes ''The locus of the dispute is Kosovo and closely related articles, chiefly regarding the characterization of its constitutional status and relationship to Serbia.'' - and it is, as you can see, very broad. We can probably specify when we close, I usually do, but then I'm not sure I'll be the one who closes. ]] 15:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: OK, if you mean the entire topic area, that's fine. DeltaQuad mentioned just one particular part, and when you replied to them, you didn't discuss that bit. --] (]) 17:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::: We generally tack on the words "broadly construed" when topic banning, and we construe fairly broadly. Back in Oct 2011 I ] on a ] topic ban "''You joked about bird articles in the AE case; I tell you now, if you change a category on a bird article from Birds of England to Birds of Ireland, I'm not at all sure it wouldn't be covered. You need to edit something that has nothing to do with Ireland or the Troubles in any conceivable way.''" You can also read archives of AE to see how it is applied. ]] 18:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Hmm. Does this wording then mean they're prevented from writing about e.g. Serbian football clubs? That would seem excessive. IOW we've gone from too narrow to too broad. --] (]) 22:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Yes, it does. They cannot write about anything Serbian, whether football clubs or terrorists or history or anything else. That is what a broadly construed topic ban ''is''. They are free to write about other things. Very little of Misplaced Pages is Serbian and Kosovo related. Hit "random article" a few dozen times, and I'll be surprised if you hit a single article which is covered under the topic ban. ]] 22:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I know that we have the ArbCom rulings to cover it, but the point I was trying to make is that including the whole topic area seems excessive for one article in the topic area when there are articles in that area that the user can contribute to properly. I was looking for something a little smaller than all of Serbia topic ban, because I didn't see enough to feel that the whole topic area ban was justified. -- ] ] 02:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: Ditto. --] (]) 10:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::: I disagree, obviously. Here is the issue (and I speak as someone who has been at AE quite a bit): If we do not outline a broadly construed topic area, then the editors often skirt the fringes, still repeating the behavior which led to the topic ban. Let's look at sports, for example. How easy would it be to slip in an ethnic slur, or bias, such as we saw in the AE evidence? No, we make it broad for a very good reason. This is standard practice. If he does well and learns to keep his personal bias out of articles, and not misuse sources, he'll come back to editing this topic area with the knowledge he needs to avoid further sanctions. This generally does not happen in topic areas which the editor has shown he has very strong personal views about, which he has not kept out of his editing. He can learn this in topic areas which have nothing to do with the problem topic area much better. If he merely chooses articles from ], he can edit ten hours a day and still have work to do before the year is out. He can edit. But in my experience, allowing leeway leads to troubles. I prefer to avoid that. ]] 20:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::I do want to thank you for your response. I do understand as you have explained that if we don't make it broad, its a game of cat and mouse on enforcement. While I may not completely agree with your decision, I do mostly agree with it, and after that point, I still respect it. -- ] ] 08:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::I'm glad you get that. Not just a game of cat and mouse for us, but sometimes seems like a game of entrapment to them. And thank you. ]] 10:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :May I edit at least sport articles please?Thank you--] (]) 20:08, 23 February 2013 (UTC)--] (]) 19:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: Not Serbian/Albanian/Kosovo, no. You can edit other sports articles, but not if any of the players are from the restricted topic area, and not if the article touches on the topic area in any way. ]] 20:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Please, i wrote about 98% Serbian sport, especially about football, but also basketball etc., I never had a problem with nobody. I improved a lot of articles, wrote about players and stadiums etc. I create also a lot of articles about sport. I get even a barn star. You can all see this on my Misplaced Pages edit history etc. Please allow me to write about Serbian sports. This have nothing to do with politics and is not a controvers topics. I'm only come because of sports to wikipedia, only the last months I am moved a little bit to other topics. But my main topic, my beloved topic is sport, this is a topic which interrested me 120%. Please allow me to write about sports in Serbia, why so a hard punishment. I made mistakes in politic topics, but I never hat a problem with sports. You banned me because of my mistakes about controvers politic topics, but why i banned also for sport, although i never made mistakes there and although I was never prosecuted there?I think its right to punish for things who someone done wrong, but I never made mistakes there and i was never prosecuted there. Please allow me to write about sports in Serbia.--] (]) 21:11, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no other interest area here and I had to wait a year to get back to improve Serbian sporting articles or update.--] (]) 21:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::You probably should have thought about that before you transgressed our policies so seriously and ended up at AE. Sports can be very controversial, especially if ethnic slurs or source misuse is involved. Tell you what: Pick any two redlinks (nothing which violates your topic ban) from ] and write articles on the subjects. I expect actual articles, not stubs. Then come back and see me in two months, and we'll discuss it again. ]] 21:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| By all my respect, but I have not done with deliberate errors. I was not aware of the consequences of my error. Others get a warning or a ban on certain topics, and I get a ban on everything. That's not fair. In any civil legal system you will be punished for what you have really done and here? There was never porbleme on Misplaced Pages relating to sports, or business, agriculture, Serbian food or brands, nature etc. I've created stadium sites, player dates updated (goals, transfers, etc.), updated data, where is this controversy? I understand what you mean, but I do not edit the Albanian League or sports. Why do all my work will not be considered positive? Why all this is overlooked? I can not at all in conflict with Albania, because it has nothing to do with Serbian Sports. There is no Serbian-Albanian Football League, etc. Why is it bad if I edit about a Serbian dog, or football data (statistics), or write about a food stamp, or national parks in Serbia? about nature. This is absolutely not about those things for which I was punished. What's bad about it when I add ] as a remarkable person in ] because he was born there? Look please here i create for example this small article about ], improved and create 80% of the ] article till the section Club records, improved every article about almost evry club and their stadiums in the first and second league (you can ask the users there). I create a article about the ] dairy. Here, nothing is bad KillerChihuahua. Please, Serbian sport, agriculture, Serbian food or brands, nature etc. have nothing to do with controversial topics with Albania etc. Please allow me, if anything were to arise, I would not take to it and report it to you immediately if you wish, but it will not happen because I think Nature etc. is not controversial. Topics like ] (which is from Serbia), ], or the dog ] and stadiums are not controversial. Please i have good faith intentions. Besied this, what you mean with not stubs? Thank you!--] (]) 12:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :The reason we make topic bans broad rather than narrow is so you don't misjudge the boundaries and violate it. The way it is now: You can edit anything which has nothing to do with Serbia, Albania, Kosovo. Simple. Not confusing. Now, you can keep leaving long posts here about how good you'll be if I'll just let you write about Serbian football, or you can take my offer above, or you can wait out the 12 months, or you can go back to AE and contest the topic ban. ]] 13:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| KC, I'd like to appeal to you once again to take two factors into account: we already have one Serbian user, ], who was topic-banned similarly, but after several incidents (three previous smaller blocks over several years), and for only six months rather than a year. I agree that it's easy for them to cross the line, and indeed I was personally involved in a situation where FkpCascais at one point did exactly that, but ] was still patient with them and I think the topic-banned user did not transgress further. As I recall, Nado158's behavior was not worse than FkpCascais', so I think it would be best to follow the same standard and at least make the two sanctions match, in order to avoid the impression he's getting treated in a manner that is less fair than someone else in a similar situation. --] (]) 18:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :First you're worried it's too narrow, no you're complaining it's too broad. Well, you can't please everybody; there is no sweet spot which will satisfy everyone's idea of an appropriate sanction. There are always people who think you are too hard or too soft. I have a proposal above which will shorten the time by as much as 10 months, to only two months, but both you and he are ignoring that offer. I'm all done talking about this. Puppy has spoken, puppy is done. ]] 18:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: The ''scope'' was narrow; the ''duration'' is twice as long as FC. --] (]) 21:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::What is "FC"? And what scope was narrow? I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. ]] 21:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::: FC == User:FkpCascais. The scope that DeltaQuad had proposed was narrow, because it only involved Kosovo and Albania. --] (]) 08:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I did not ignore the offer, but sorry, I didn't quite understand it, so I asked before what you mean with your statement ACTUAL ARTICLE, NOT STUBS? STUBS? Thank you!--] (]) 20:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Apologies, I must have missed that question. I mean, more than a couple of sentences and one source. I'm flexible, but I want to see some content, say a couple of paragraphs, several sources, an image would be nice. I'm looking for a serious effort from you to write an article, as opposed to slapping up a short description of the topic. You can read more at ] - it is an excellent way to ''start'' an article, but I'm saying I want to see more. Let me know if you're still unclear. ]] 20:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| No problem. All right, I agree with your proposal. Thank you!--] (]) 21:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Excellent, please keep me informed (tell me when you've picked your articles, etc.) ]] 21:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I have a question please. It must just be exactly these from you proposed redlinks, or it can also be used redlinks from the last or coming week? Besides this, may I write an own articles (in consultation with you, of course)?For example an animal variety, airplane model, a machine etc? May I suggest two articles?--] (]) 16:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm willing to be flexible, I gave you that list because they're the most requested articles, but I'm not glued to just that list. What two articles would you like to write? ]] 16:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Nado158 articles == | |||
| (I started a new thread because the old one was getting way too long. ]] 21:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| Well, an article about ], one of the largest websites for sports with a focus on football, and the most visited German Sports Page in 2013, International also well known, and the ], the world's largest exhibition for animal husbandry and management, with over 100,000 visitors from 100 countries. Are you agree?--] (]) 21:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I do, sounds good. Nice way for you to get sports in without violating your topic ban, too, so you can use your expertise and edit something which interests you. I applaud your choices. ]] 21:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you! If I'm done I will inform you! Regards!--] (]) 21:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:Your recent edits == | |||
| I already left a message to Bishonen, asking if the correct word was the one Bishonen applied, Bishonen said yes. The problem is solved. (] (]) 18:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| :No, the problem is not solved unless you actually read ENGVAR and cease edit warring over UK.US spelling differences. It is '''not''' just about that one single word which Bishonen had already told you several times was correct. It is about not edit warring and violating ENGVAR. If you understand that, then yes it is "solved". If you think it's about that one single edit war, then no, it is not solved. ]] 20:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::I read ENGVAR, the problem is '''solved'''. (] (]) 22:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| :::And as I've already said, that is only half the issue. Did you also read ]? ]] 22:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes I did ;). (] (]) 23:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| :::Excellent. Now I consider it "solved". :-) ]] 23:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I took the edit you removed as more or less just a friendly gesture. I didn't think anything more of it than I would a smiley or other neutrally friendly note. ]] 03:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Aw, Thank You >.< (] (]) 20:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| == You must claim this == | |||
| ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 04:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :You mean register it? Might not be a bad idea, as it is apparently a doppelganger. ]] 04:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::And a cute one too ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 04:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Done. A very good idea. ] (]) 04:58, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I tagged the new account for you. ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 05:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::And we just , heh. ]] 05:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| What about ? A bit of a tautology, perhaps. ] | ] 21:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC). | |||
| :Well, if we don't have a KillerChinchilla, we certainly need one. ] (]) 23:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Bish: I have yet to see you register ] or ] ... no wait, you have enough socks, your drawer must be overflowing. | |||
| :Mangoe: Well, we have me. I'm two, two, two Killers in one! <small>cheesy Certs commercial reference, for the confused.)</small> ]] 17:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == RFCC == | |||
| Regarding your comments ], I would like to invite you to consider RFCC as an alternative. <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 02:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :No, but it might be worth taking to RFAR. ]] 02:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Arbitration isn't much more than polite way of forcing specialized contributors into semi- or full retirement; it shouldn't ever be on the table unless all other options have been exhausted, and they haven't been here. <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 06:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm not opening four different Rfc's on editors whose responses to an uninvolved admin warning them was either insults or in one case, asking that I be desysopped. It would be an excercise in futility. An Rfc presumes they care what people say; they clearly don't. I '''have''', however, taken it to RFAR; it is at ] if you wish to make a statement. ]] 06:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I really don't have much else to say 1:1 since I'm as uninvolved as you are (aside from previously having to deal with one party's shenanigans both as an editor and informal mediator) but I can't see how I'm expected to reconcile in a subsequent comment. There's literally no additional information to reiterate — I just wanted to preclude the off chance that my words might be misinterpreted as anti-ArbCom when they were never intended as such. That, and I noticed a grammatical mistake. <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 07:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm not following your point, I'm afraid. ]] 15:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Which? <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 15:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::KillerChihuahua, do you have the link to the AN thread? Thanks. ] (]) 19:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::To which? Are you asking for the link to the ANI thread I started a couple of days ago, or ? ]] 20:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Sorry, the one you posted on ArbCom that said the thread had been reopened. I keep missing it when I look for it there. Need new glasses I guess. ] (]) 20:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::No, your glasses are fine (or at any rate not the problem here); someone moved the thread to a sub-page last night. It is now to be found at ]. ]] 20:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Oh that's what happened. Thanks! ] (]) 20:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::: You're welcome. ]] 20:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Since no one else commented on the RFC yet, I've gone ahead and reset the terms to reflect your criticism. If you're not OK with that, feel free to I just think it's a better way to start off. <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 00:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{outdent}} No, that's fine with me. In the future, though, don't remove someone else's post. You can simply ''reply'' to it, saying "I have changed the verbiage to match your suggestions" or "I have edited the Rfc to reflect your criticism" and leave their post in place. Removing someone else's post, unless it is a personal attack, is almost never a good idea. ]] 00:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :That's what I was going to do, but we've been interacting so closely that I figured you wouldn't mind with full disclosure. <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 00:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::And you figured rightly! ]] 00:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ygm == | |||
| {{ygm}} <small>]</small> 02:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :K, thanks. Just wanted to confirm I was looking at the section you were referring to. ]] 02:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == You know I didn't mean nuttin == | |||
| I understood what you were doing when you added Collect, Rubin et al to the list. Others may not have. I threw my hands up in the air you were added as well. This isn't even drama. It's Jerry Springer. ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 04:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Eh, I didn't view it that I added them at all. Others added them, but failed to format the additions correctly. I felt if others were calling for topic bans, then it should be clearly organized so people would see and be able to voice their opinions. It was clerking. That's all. But yes, I know some people did not realize that was what I was doing. Thanks for leaving this note, nice to hear it was clear to at least one editor... and yeah, Springer ''wishes'' he had episodes as messed up as that ANI thread. ]] 04:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious == | |||
| <div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> | |||
| <div> | |||
| <div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}}">]</div> | |||
| '''benign, forgiving creature with a bite'''<br /> | |||
| Thank you for continuous quality contributions not only to articles, but mediation, editor retention, help to ], ], and to , - repeating: you are an ] (2 June 2007, 17 May 2009, 25 November 2009)! | |||
| --] (]) 11:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| ps: typically I call it my PumpkinSky Prize, but for you it's the ] Prize, --] (]) 11:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you so much!!!! I love barnstars, and yours is all shiny and pretty!!! ]] 11:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Actually, now that I think about it, Phaedrial's first run at this sort of thing was shiny and pretty too, she did Today's Star Shines On . So, yay to shiny pretty! ]] 11:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::(ec) I ]. | |||
| :::Yeah, there are a lot of people to miss, and PS is one who is very much missed by many. :-( ]] 12:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::(after ec) that's where I come from (look at the awesome list), she started and he did it for the longest time, --] (]) 11:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, I know - but did you know she did "today's star shines on..." before she did the Awesome Wikipedian one you're continuing ? It had a lovely star, silver on a deep blue background, now deleted. You can see it at ] and you can see the Awesome Wikipedian she gave out at ]. The Today's Star was the precursor. She didn't give one out every day, and I don't think she kept a record. That came later, with Awesome Wikipedian. :-) ]] 12:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Support''' for all "''Precious puppies''" — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 20:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 18:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == KC is in the hospital == | |||
| This is Mr. Chihuahua. KC is in the hospital for testing... she may have had a heart attack. She said to tell everyone she will be back as soon as she can. She apologizes for the bad timing. ] (]) 18:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :The best to you KC. Including for a quick and complete recovery. All else lately is small stuff and secondary. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> (]) 19:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ec}} Hope all goes well. Best wishes, ] (]) 19:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Take care - I had my quintuple bypass a few years back now and appreciate the stress you are also undergoing as well. ] (]) 20:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Best wishes for a fast and complete recovery! --] (]) 20:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Wishing you all the best and a speeding recovery! ] (]) 20:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :All good thoughts, Puppy. Could it possibly be in a way good timing? Your body's clever way of getting you away from stressing about RFAR? Oh.. and stressing about illness instead. No, I guess that won't work. :-( ] | ] 20:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC). | |||
| :Hope you're back with us soon, KC! --] 20:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Dagnabit .. TY for letting us know Mr. Chihuahua, and KC certainly has all my prayers and best wishes for a very speedy recovery. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 20:38, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Indeed, get well soon KC; the priority is your full recuperation. . . .], ] 20:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Rest and take it easy. In my thoughts. Hope it was not a heart attack and wish you a speedy recovery.--] (]) 20:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Fortunately, we live in an era where "had a heart attack" is not necessarily synonymous with "died". Be well. ] (]) 20:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Best wishes for a speedy and complete recovery. ] | ] 21:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Best wishes, ], --] (]) 21:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Ditto. Hope everything goes well. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 21:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *I really hope this sounds worse than it is; best wishes for a fast recovery. ] (]) 22:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *My sincere hopes for a speedy and complete recovery. I am quite shocked and distressed by this turn of events. My best wishes to you and your loved ones in this challenging time. ]]] 22:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Mr Chihuahua is reporting on FB that KC thinks that the hospital food tastes good. This strikes me as a worrying development. ;) ] (]) 22:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Mr. Chihuahua brought me my tablet so I will be available between tests. THANK YOU ALL for all the lovely wishes. Guettarda, almost anything tastes good when you haven't eaten for 9 hours while people take blood and poke you. ] (]) 22:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *: <nowiki>*happy dancing*</nowiki> Hooray, tablet! :-) --] 23:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *::Editing wikipedia between tests? Join the club :) ] (]) 23:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Just had a hospital hamburger yesterday while visiting my spouses grandmother after her operation. I think I have recovered now.--] (]) 23:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Show those docs whose boss! ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 23:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *My best to you and the entire Chihuahua family! Hope you recover quickly! ] <small>]</small> 23:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *KillerChihuahua, just found out. Hope all is well. Hospitals are scary not fun places but you are safe there. Feel better and get well. Sending you lots of positive energy. ] (]) 23:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Just heard the bad news. Get well soon and enjoy the hospital food. ] <small>(])</small> 00:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: @ KC - wait. Tablet? Details damn it .. we want details. Droid? IPad? Kindle? Windows 8? ... Inquiring minds want to know. Hell - I gave up my "bit" over a damn tablet ... fantastic cursed little things. ... Seriously though KC. I really do appreciate you going to the effort to stay in touch. Obviously you have a huge fan club that cares a great deal. Taking the time to talk to us says it all - ''WHY'' you have such a following. You take care of yourself girl - let Mr. KC spoil the heck outta you. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 00:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I was actually a little upset that your husband was "enabling you" while you were in the hospital.....but then I would have demanded my spouse's tablet within the first 5 minutes myself! LOL! Now...seriously, get some rest. Also, ignore my reply to you on my talkpage. You need not concern yourself about it. Knowing that you are ill means a great deal more than my opinion of your involvement in any disputes. Just get well and use the tablet to watch "grumpy cat" videos. they are hilarious.--] (]) 02:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * 哎呀, hope you're all better soon! ] ] 01:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Wishing you a speedy recovery. <small>]</small> 03:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Best of luck to you KC, I hope nothing too incredibly serious happened... and hope you aren't subjected to hospital food for too long. ] (]) 03:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Sorry to hear. Let that Chihuahua inside you rest for now to a full recovery and enjoy the time in the sanity of real life. :) -- ] ] 03:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Funny, I also thought the food wasn't too bad. But anyhow: recover speedily please. We need you back here posthaste! Woof! ] ] 04:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| **'''Support speedy recovery''' - Is there a template for that? ;)--] (]) 04:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ***Although I get the sentiment, you never want a template for these things. If you have one, it happens to often. Even if it does, I would always prefer to put my own words of personal support for that person. :) KillerChihuahua is no exception. -- ] ] 04:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ****It was this thing called a "joke". We don't give up our sense of humor when we log in. At least I don't. It was meant to be a light hearted comment, hopefully to make the puppy smile.--] (]) 04:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *****Of course, I was working off the basis that it was a joke, and my reply was more a comment about what you said, not the meaning of what you said. Honestly don't worry about my comment much. I of course love jokes when appropriate :D -- ] ] 08:55, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Whoa...this isn't good to see...we were just having an exchange at my yap page earlier...hope you are okay. Kindest regards.--] 05:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Because laughter is the best medicine: | |||
| ''' | |||
| Hope you enjoy | |||
| "Baby does faceplants": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS3dHKWVP7Y | |||
| ] (]) 05:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Very best wishes to you, KC, and I'm glad to know Mr. Chihuahua is staying out of the doghouse and fetching your tablet and so on. ] (]) 08:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Update: it is 4:30 am here. Wish I could answer each and every one of you but for now I will just make a start. Malke: the connection here is dog slow, but that was cute. Mongo: I still can tell bad jokes. I have not lost that skill. Ched: it is a Samsung Galaxy 7, which means TinyScreen. It runs on Android. Wishing now that I'd gotten a 10. Collect:thank you sharing something so personal, it means a lot. Everyone else: thank you, so much! ] (]) 09:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Get well soon! ] <sup>]</sup> 13:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : I think I just hurt myself laughing.] (]) 19:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Hope you are feeling better. Get well soon! ] (]) 14:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Wishing you a peaceful recovery with good nurses :) Please rest and be well soon. All the best. <b>] ]</b> 15:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * thanks so much to all of you! Gerda, you're right, how serendipitous that we were talking about that just a couple of days ago, and that poem is just what I need! Bishonen: only you, dear, would think of that. ] (]) 18:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| **Get a specimen cup and pour some apple juice inside. When the nurse comes in, have a drink. ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 18:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ** I think I hurt myself laughing! ] (]) 22:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *My prayers are with you. Get well soon and get out of that hospital!-] (]) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| **thank you vey much. ] (]) 22:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *I, too, wish you all the best and a speedy recovery! I hope the doctors don't ban you from Misplaced Pages, because it may well be on some list of things contraindicated for people with heart problems :-) <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Puppy for you == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Waiting for your return...''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I'm sorry to hear that you are not feeling well. Hope you are feeling better soon. — ] 19:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| I love it! It is even a chihuahua! Thank you! ] (]) 23:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposal for RfA conduct clarification == | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. {{#if:|{{{more}}}}} <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- ]</span> (]) 21:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC){{z48}} | |||
| :Thanks to ] for pointing out ]. This notification probably has little relative importance, and I hope you make a good recovery soon. Best wishes. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- ]</span> (]) 21:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Did you mean ]--] (]) 22:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Update == | |||
| Test came back, not a heart attack. There is a mass on my thyroid, and my levels are waaay off. They're doing more tests, I'm going to be in the hospital at least another day. ] (]) 16:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Good news ... puppy is heart healthy! Hoping for more good news re your "mixed up chems" (that "waaay off" bit). ] (]) 17:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Impressed with your commitment here, editing at hospital lol. But then it's better than TV and I know how boring the confinement can get. Hope you can avoid aggravation and get out of there soon! '']'' <sup>(])</sup> 19:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yay! That's a relief. Glad you liked the baby video. Put your feet up and enjoy the food. Maybe Mr. Chihuahua could bring in doctor approved take-out. Feel better. ] (]) 19:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Dunno about heart healthy, they're doing a stress test in the morning. But not a heart attack. El D, I probably wouldn't be except I did just file an rfar. Malke, GMTA, butthey won't let me. And the soup I had the first night was the last good food I've had. :-( But I hope to be out of here soon. ] (]) 19:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| '''Unsolicted advice''' Get Mr. C to bring in your comfortable walking shoes, and stretch your calves an hour before. ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 21:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :thanks but they've decided it is too risky to give me the stress test before they take care of the rhyroid. My heartbeat is running fast and they're afraid the stress test will ''give'' me a heart attavk. So that's off the table for now. Thanks for the advice tho, I'm sure theyll get back to it. ] (]) 22:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Add me to the list of folks that are very happy to hear it wasn't a heart attack. Perhaps just your body letting you know it's time to start taking good care of yourself. Thank you very much for the update Puppy; may your leash be long, and your treats plentiful. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 21:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * Great to know it's going as well as could be expected, KC, keep on mending and get yourself fit and out to where the food is good! Your recent edits show devotion beyond the call of duty. I'm impressed by your plunging into the tea party morass, and very much hope that this is your idea of fun and relaxation, or at any rate a welcome distraction from the hospital environment. However, while getting the editing there detoxed feels beyond my currently tired brain right now, you've flagged up the issues and others will have to come forward and help resolve the problems. Including me, if needed. Will sleep on that, and hope you'll do whatever gives you useful recuperation and rest. . . ], ] 22:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Please avoid that nasty place called ARBCOM till you're healed up. Even mini-death-dogs are bound to have increased metabolic issues after venturing into that black hole. Get well immediately though!--] 00:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::*Shame about the food thing. Now don't be a-scared of the test. It will all work out okay. Just keep saying that in your head. ] (]) 00:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Whew! Good news. All else is small stuff.<font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> (]) 23:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 25 February 2013 == | |||
| <div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-02-25}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 9, Issue 8--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 05:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0474 --> | |||
| == Behaviour of Zad68 == | |||
| The user has placed a personal attack by threating in http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Medical_uses_of_silver. | |||
| "This would be helpful with the likely upcoming WP:ANI discussion about Ryan's tendentious editing. Zad68" I have removed it as a personal attack by threatening. However the original editor has restored it. I also think even if there is a doubt as if its a personal attack per content, being placed on the DRN talk it looks like a personal attack even more. It just came out of nowhere, irrelevant to the current DRN discussion. Thank you. | |||
| :This user has posted the same sentence on multiple talk pages 'by stalking me' including the irrelant ones like the DRN discussion "FYI I have commented on the relevance of the Leeds in vitro study to Quackwatch's characterization of ingested colloidal silver here. Zad68" | |||
| And despite that editor TransporterMan has said: "This DRN talk page is not the venue to further argue the dispute." and my comments that it's not the venue, he continues to engage in the DRN discussion regarding the article context and other editors. | |||
| Thank you. ] (]) 16:37, 28 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you're asking. ]] 16:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi KC, here's the story: Ryan's involved in ] DRN discussion with myself and a few others, the case wasn't going his way, but the case got archived due to inactivity before resolution (Ryan fell ill), Ryan came back and for the case to be un-archived. The DRN volunteer, Carrie, was unwilling - see her comment to Ryan , highlight: "it's now very clear that ''not one'' other editor agrees with you or is willing to agree to your request ... This was going to be your final shot, and it hasn't worked. You are not going to get a consensus for this. It's time to ]." I to Carrie I'd support de-archiving the case for the purpose of closing it, as "This would be helpful with the likely upcoming ] discussion about Ryan's tendentious editing." With that, Carrie agreed and dearchived the case. (Exciting ''tune-in-next-week'' cliffhanger: In his closure , Ryan agreed to the proposal but also stated "I'll challenge it in formal mediation process.")<p>Ryan felt my statement about taking this to ANI was a "threat" and edited my comment, I restored my comment and pointed Ryan to ] for the list of conditions where it's acceptable edit someone else's comment (this isn't one of them), he disagreed, but we then both agreed that an admin should handle it from here, full discussion ]. I think Ryan's request is for you to review what's happened and take any action you deem necessary. It would have been nice if he had notified me he was contacting you about this. It's unclear to me why Ryan came to you in particular with this request, maybe you've helped him out with something before? Anyway, sorry to hear you're one sick pup, hopefully the trip to vet did you good. Take care... <code>]]</code> 17:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::It is unclear to me as well, but it has happened before that editors have come to me and I have no recollection of them. Sometimes we've participated in a discussion somewhere I just don't remember, sometimes they've just seen me around. This case seems a little more unusual - I checked our interaction, and we have had one encounter before - in Dec 2012 I if he continued making threats. It seems you have the situation well in hand; if there is zero support for his view then the DRN should probably remain closed. Thank you for taking the time to explain this situation to me, and for your kind words regarding my current illness. ]] 17:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == New update == | |||
| At home, on meds, will be going to more tests and lots of follow up visits for a while. Thanks again to everyone who was so kind as to leave well wishes on this page, it means a lot to me. I'm still sick and will be irregular in my editing but at least I'm off the little tablet. ]] 15:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Glad to hear you're back home. Regards, ] (]) 16:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Godspeed.--] <sub>] ]</sub> 16:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Happy you've improved enough to come home ], see ya in the pastures (ANI? AC?) <small>]</small> 16:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks much. They have me on meds that have the symptoms tamped down while they do the testing/diag/treatment of the causal issues. I am glad to be out of the hospital and back home and back on a real screen instead of the tiny screen of the tablet. Once you open the keyboard on one of those things, you can barely see where you're editing, and navigation was a pain (my touchscreen is a bit wonky.) I'll be off an on, but will muddle along until they get it fixed. ]] 16:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Good to hear that you're home. ] (]) 16:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Grand news, a much better place to convalesce or do whatever's best to get yourself well. Keep up the good non-work! (or even keep working if that suits better) . . . ], ] 22:52, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Glad to hear it, Puppy. . .and not just being off the tablet, but having real food. . .Happy for you! ] (]) 23:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Requesting your opinion at ] == | |||
| Hi, I'm contacting you because you have recently contributed as a reviewing administrator to ]. I've made a suggestion relating to the management of that page at ], and would appreciate your input. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:33, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :thanks, I've commented there. Much appreciated. ]] 01:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Ashkenazi Jews == | |||
| An edit war has once again broken out on this article. I think we need to upgrade the protection level. The controversial nature of the topic makes it a magnet for people with agendas.] (]) 09:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the ''']''', an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Misplaced Pages project for twenty years or more. ​ | |||
| == Single-payer healthcare == | |||
| Best regards, ] (]) 02:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hey I know you're busy with the TPM article but some of the same people are causing problems in the ] article. In the talk page there was for a particular edit and 3 users (North8000, Thargor Orlando and Arzel) have been edit-warring against it. If you could take a look it would be much appreciated. ] (]) 18:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} <!-- Template:Twenty Year Society invitation --><span id="The_Herald:1719628742029:User_talkFTTCLNKillerChihuahua" class="FTTCmt">— ] (]) 02:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC)</span> | |||
| : Well, when I started the RFAR I listed it as "TPM / US right wing politics" but an Arb changed the name for brevity. Please add a statement to the RFAR with this. ]] 19:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 30 September 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. KillerChihuahua has not edited Misplaced Pages since February 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Userpage | talk | contribs | sandbox | e-mail | shiny stuff 2:19 pm, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives Centralized discussion 
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Happy First Edit Day!
Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Misplaced Pages project for twenty years or more. Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC) — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
||||||||||
