Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dahn: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:58, 23 May 2006 editApostolos Margaritis (talk | contribs)1,885 edits Circassians← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:16, 13 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,635 edits The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
{{Boxboxtop|}}
{{User MAW400}}
{{Boxboxbottom}}
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}

==Archives==
<div style="font-size: 85%; -moz-column-count:4; column-count:4;">
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
</div>


<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: 8px green; background-color: #ffffff"> <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: 8px green; background-color: #ffffff">
<p style="margin-left: 1%; margin-right: 1%; line-height: 8%; text-indent: 1%;"> <p style="margin-left: 1%; margin-right: 1%; line-height: 8%; text-indent: 1%;"></p>
<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 12px red; background-color: white;"> <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 12px red; background-color: white;">
'''This user declares his annoyance at browsing through articles initiated by US or UK users which fail to mention that the theme has to do with one of the two countries (arguably because they assume that English language wiki means "English/American wiki").'''</div> '''This user declares his annoyance at browsing through articles initiated by US or UK users which fail to mention that the theme has to do with one of the two countries (arguably because they assume that English language wiki means "English/American wiki").'''</div>
</div>

==Twigs on branches==

Well, is the (hopefully useful) entry… — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:. Author: Dumitru Micu. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 15:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
*Many many thanks, {{U|Biruitorul}}. Also while we're at it: care to help me move ] those that fit the description out ]? ] (]) 11:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

*{{ping|Biruitorul}} Do Sasu and the DBLR/DGLR have entries on Alexandru Talex? ] (]) 19:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
*:Sasu no, DBLR I only have volume P/R at the moment, will check in due time. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 07:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
*: here, for example Ralet at p. 138. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 09:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
*: is Talex. Volume S/T, author Teodor Vârgolici. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 11:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

::I also picked up some other stuff, more or less randomly:
:: (why not?), by Iordan Datcu;
:: by Ana-Maria Brezuleanu, Alexandru Farcaș, Ion Istrate;
::And two from vol. E/K: (Florin Faifer);
::and (Călin Teutișan). — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 11:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

*Of possible interest: ]. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 14:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

:Tita , author Alexandru Teodorescu, vol. S/T (like all of these)
:Teodorescu-Braniște , Ofelia Ichim
:Păstorel , Nicolae Mecu
:Tafrali , Călin Teutișan (bonus: Talaz, by Eugen Onu) — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 15:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
::Wow! Big thanks! ] (]) 15:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

:Here is the Scînteia stuff: , , , , , ,

:Authors: Tudor Hăndăbuț, Ioan Milea, Magda Wächter, Nicolae Bârna (no idea who I. T. is; not in the index). Also, see ]. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 08:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

As this was rescued from the archive, how about we celebrate with a couple from vol. C/D?

Deșliu: , . Author: Nicolae Mecu

Caraion: , , , , . Author: Laurențiu Hanganu. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 15:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Fănuș, Volume L/O, author Dumitru Micu: , , , , . — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 10:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

:And is Sasu; author: Radu G. Țeposu. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 10:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you! Micu is more eminently usable than RGT, who is by now a bit redundant to what's already present and more detailed in the text. ] (]) 11:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::My pleasure. One point: my understanding is that Simion only authored the short italicized quotation on p. 561, and that Micu (based on the credit on 562) is the sole author of the entry. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Will amend in my next edits. ] (]) 22:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Raicu: , , , . Author Alexandra Ciocârlie, vol. P/R. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 10:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

A bit of has crept back in here. I do like the “Prof. Dr.” on the new photo. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

*{{ping|Biruitorul}} În altă ordine de idei, do you happen to have a DGLR entry on Cavarnali? Or an a fella by the name of Liviu Bratoloveanu? ] (]) 14:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
*:Unfortunately, not right now: I’m physically rather far from any DGLR volumes. In about six weeks’ time — say October 1 at the latest — I’ll have them for you. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 16:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
*::So, I have quite the update. Some kind soul uploaded DLGR last year, in its entirety. It’s the 2016 edition, ISBN 978-973-167-381-3 for the first volume, A/B. (Cavarnali doesn’t have an entry.) , Here’s Bratoloveanu, author Victor Durnea.
*::The link is . I know you’re not an Internet Archive fan, but at least this is the section without a subscription required, and I suppose it beats waiting until autumn. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::Excellent, and thank you for this find! (As it happens, I don't dislike them, I just happened to be annoyed by some guy's unhinged claim that I should subscribe on IA to verify random DYK hooks, just in case the paper source is there.) ] (]) 06:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

*. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 14:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

* Here is part of a 1975 essay by Pleșu on Pandrea on Brâncuși (with a bit of Botta thrown in) :, , , , , , , , . — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
** And here’s Sasu (vol. II, pp. 280-81, author Dan C. Mihăilescu): , . — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
*** There’s in this edition of ''Memoriile…''. Select one of the slow downloads and enjoy. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

*While we wait for the IA to come back into service, here’s Schileru: , , . Vol. S/Ș, author Emil Moangă. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 08:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

==Some help==

Hi Dahn, hope you're well. With this message I expose myself further as a talk page stalker, hope you don't mind... Above you mentioned Arcanum, a great resource that I am surprised I had never heard about before. I've found there many newspapers talking about marginal figures, which probably duplicates the amount of sources about them that I thought existed. One such figure is George Ceara (or Ceară), an Aromanian poet. He seems to be related to a modern Aromanian poet, Ilie A. Ceara (or Ceară, likewise). I had planned writing a page for George for months but couldn't find any source explaining their relation. Only once I found a book snippet which I dismissed anyway because I think I deemed it to be inappropriate (maybe it was a primary source, I don't remember anymore) believing I could find something better, but I haven't been able to. Could you help me out? I see both have many results in Arcanum, does any explain the relation between the two? Regards, ] ] ] 12:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:Hi, Super, and thanks for stalking me, as well as for all the wonderful work you're putting in! has the following: ''De reţinut este şi faptul că unul dintre cei 7 fraţi şi o soră a tatălui lui Ilie Ceară a făcut Facultatea de Litere din Bucureşti şi a ajuns profesor, atât în şcolile din România, cât şi în Grecia de Nord, dar şi un cunoscut poet de expresie română şi aromână cu numele George Ceară. Nepotul acestuia, scriitorul Ilie Ceară, încă de la vârsta de 5 ani a ajuns orfan de tată, orfan şi de mamă.'' (Citation Emil Lazăr-Dejeanul, "Scriitorul aromân Ilie Ceară", in ''Astra Dejeană'', Vol. VII, Issues 3–4, December 2000, p. 14). ] (]) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
::This is exactly what I needed. Thank you so much for the help! Best, ] ] ] 21:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:::By the way Dahn, what pages does "Scriitorul aromân Ilie Ceară" cover in the magazine? Just for the sake of exact citing. ] ] ] 19:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Just page 14. ] (]) 21:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Ilie Purcaru==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''', as a contributor to ], claimed that a young Ceaușescu had walked into the woods of ] without fearing their wolves?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for splitting==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 21:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

== ''The Bugle'': Issue 218, June 2024 ==

{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1222774107 -->

==DYK for Alexandru Talex==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' was described as "the gentlest" member of ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;] (]) 00:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Rose flowers, Bingen.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
Thank you for another good one! --] (]) 07:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hello! I created an article about József Fischer, a prominent leader of the ].
If you would like to expand, please feel free to do that, since I found only incomplete information about his political involvement in Romania. ] (]) 20:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Norden1990}} A general advice, if I may: the sources I used in writing the Jewish Party article have more in-depth coverage about the Fischers than the prose required there. I would suggest that, instead of repeating the content you have found in the article, you have a fresh look at the sources cited which you can check yourself (Frojimovics ''et al'', presumably), and complete the research with detail that should not go into the party article, but needs to appear in a biography. Otherwise, the article just looks like a transplant of info. ] (]) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
::Unfortunately, I do not speak nor write Romanian, and my knowledge of the Romanian political system between the two world wars is extremely limited. The person was interesting to me because of his activities in Hungary during the Holocaust. --] (]) 09:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Norden1990}} There is absolutely nothing unfortunate about that, you are actually of immense value to this project as a Hungarian-speaker (and of course, for many other reasons). I kindly ask that you reread what I wrote: it is precisely to ask that you please focus more of the article on sources that are only marginally used in ] (I mentioned Frojimovics ''et al'', which has some more coverage of the Fischers than was needed in the JP article, and which was published in English -- you only seem to have used and duplicated the parts that I had cited in the JP article); it is also to encourage you to also search and use sources in Hungarian that were not used in the JP article (and which will presumably have much, much more to say about Fischer and the other Fischers). That is my vision for the article, if you will. ] (]) 03:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

== WP:AN ==

When a discussion is closed, you should not edit it. By continuing the discussion to prove some point you have simply further escalated the issue. As I mentioned in the close, there are other more appropriate venues to resolve your disagreement, continued discussion at ] risks sanctions against you both if you can't disengage. <small>''''']''''' (])</small> 08:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Polyamorph}} I was simply editing in my response exactly while the discussion was being closed -- I probably entered the editing window exactly after your closure, not noticing that it had been closed in that . When I noticed that it had been closed, I had already written in my answers, and I frankly have no idea what the proper procedure is for that situation. You can of course remove my answers and re-close, but I would kindly encourage you to ]. ] (]) 13:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Ștefan Tita==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that educational writer ''']''' gave Romanian students impractical advice on mending damaged bark with bandages of dirt?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;] (]) 00:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

== Adding citations ==


Hi. When you're adding entries to articles like ], it's mandatory to include an inline citation. I've just added one for you but it would be really helpful if you could remember to do so in future. I'm aware that many of the older pages have some citations missing, because this rule didn't always exist, but if we can at least keep the more recent years fully referenced, it will improve matters. ] (]) 08:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Deb}} Has it dawned on anyone so far that basic biographical facts are referenced (or should be referenced) in the articles themselves (you can easily pick them up from there, in all articles I contribute), and that adding a string of redundant citations needlessly duplicates the text? This is why I don't consider this mandatory, and would rather not have myself bound by it. I will of course continue to cite all facts I introduce in other sections of those pages, as I have always in the past. ] (]) 10:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
::Yes, it has been much discussed and the decision was made in 2018. It's fine not to consider yourself bound by it, but be aware that your contributions can be removed, by anyone, at any time, if you don't include the citation. ] (]) 10:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I would imagine it absurd to remove an "uncited" fact that is perfectly cited in the article, but yeah, okay. On the other hand, there is nothing absolutely prevenring anyone from removing cited facts as well, particularlt on pages that are so evidently unpatrolled, and completely chaotic in content. I'll take my chances. ] (]) 11:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:Also: can we talk about what is mandatory in citations when you guys agree to at least consistently enforce a single citation format over all such pages, or at the very least over ''one'' page? ] (]) 10:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
::By "you guys", I'm assuming you mean the Misplaced Pages community, which includes you. It's open to you to raise the matter any time you choose. ] (]) 11:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:::No, just the guys who look after those particular pages. I have limited time to spend of such chores, but surely now that you are aware of this issue, and have noticed the anomaly (as for instance in the clash of styles between the citations you have added regarding Neagu, and the rest of the citations on that very page), you might start whatever procedure is required to fix it. ] (]) 11:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Nobody "looks after" pages - everyone is expected to. If you don't have time, you can drop out of the project without recrimination. ] (]) 11:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::You mean I should stop contributing to wikipedia because I didn't add citations to basic facts on those pages? If so, permit me to inform you that you are out of line. And yes: there are users who take a constant interest in the "in literature" pages, to which I only have a passing interest. Now: are we just about done here? ] (]) 11:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Yes, you should stop contributing to wikipedia if you don't add citations to basic facts. ] is non-negotiable. The ] to provide citations is on you if you edit. If you don't add citations, you can and should be blocked from editing. You've been around far too long not to understand this. And yes, we are done here. ] <small>(])</small> 17:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Before you get off my page and on to your business, please clarify how you came across this talk page and decided to go directly into taunts and faux warnings. Have we even interacted before? ] (]) 17:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


Okay, here's the deal: As a rule, I contribute massively with cited content, including the entire article that I linked to on ] -- namely, ]. I view the citations as redundant on "in literature" pages, as long as they are cited inline in the articles. I do not prevent anyone from adding citations (such as pasting them from the linked article that ''was written and referenced by me''), or citation needed tags, or even removing the facts that are "not referenced" there, on the "in literature" pages. As utterly ridiculous as that is, especially when weighed against the fact that all birth and death sections on the "in literature" pages were originally unrefenced.
== ] ==


And no: adding unsourced content, even if I ''had'' been doing that, is not a blockable offense.
Salut! Je ne suis pas d'accord avec toi. Le ], comme est son véritable nom, pilier de la Troisième République et de la Quatrième République, a longtemps accueilli aussi bien des républicains radicaux que des socialistes modérés. ], qui fut ensuite l'une des personalités les plus importantes du ], qui fut tout de même ] pendant un moment, est l'emblème de cet aspect sans aucun doute socialiste du Parti Radical. Certes, il n'hébergea pas que des socialistes, mais il n'était pas plus formé que de "libéraux". Les critères de distinction politiques français sont, comme tu le dit, peut-être un peu subtil aux yeux d'un étranger: raison de plus pour bien les expliquer sur ce Misplaced Pages. Le fait qu'encore aujourd'hui, une partie des politiques issus de ce mouvement - car il s'agit bien plus d'un mouvement que d'un parti - fasse partie du ], qui est un allié du ], montre bien que, sur certaines questions fondamentales en France (l'anticléricalisme, par exemple), une bonne partie des Radicaux du XXIe siècle se situe encore dans le camp socialiste, qui s'oppose à la droite (dont ] a jadis isolé trois familles différentes, les libéraux (]s), les néo-gaullistes appartenant à la tradition bonapartiste, et les ] contre-révolutionnaires, que l'on retrouve aujourd'hui dans les partis d'extrême droite (] et le ]). En d'autres termes, quelle que soit les confusions possibles, pour des raisons historiques (le Parti Radical a été socialiste, n'en déplaise à certains) ET actuelles (des radicaux sont encore dans le Parti socialiste, que je sache), ce parti doit bien être inclus les deux catégories opposées, ] et ]. ] 18:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


That said, let me make this very clear: haranguing and trolling me on my user page is a really bad idea, as is the suggestion that I should leave wikipedia, or be blocked from editing, for not embracing your pet peeves. Continue commenting here, particularly in this manner, and I will gladly escalate the matter (as much as I detest ANI etc procedures). Have a good day. ] (]) 17:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:Salut encore! Je continue en Français, tu l'écris très bien pour quelqu'un qui ne l'a pas parlé depuis des années! Je comprend tes réserves face à la désignation des Radicaux comme faisant partie de la "Catégorie" Socialiste. Mais, à mon avis, les catégories sur Misplaced Pages doivent surtout aider à la navigation, pas à "classifier objectivement" les partis (je ne parle même pas des catégorisations ethniques, c'est un désastre!). Selon nos opinions politiques et nos lectures historiques, on pourrait sûrement argumenter des heures durant. Toujours est-il que je pense que beaucoup de gens seraient surpris, tout comme moi, de voir que le Parti Radical-Socialiste est "présent" (plutôt que "classé") dans la catégorie "Partis libéraux", mais pas dans la catégorie "Partis socialistes". Tu as tout à fait raison de souligner que les Radicaux représentaient, pendant l'entre-deux-guerres, la petite bourgeoisie. Un historien a parlé de "République des instituteurs": ils représentaient ainsi le corps des petits fonctionnaires. Or, si tu peux considérer qu'en tant que représentant des petits-bourgeois, ils n'avaient rien de véritablement "socialistes", je suis sûr que tu comprendra qu'en tant que petits fonctionnaires, ils étaient loin d'être "libéraux"! Enfin, je pense que la vraie raison pour les mettre dans la catégorie "Socialistes" (mais je ne les exclut pas pour autant de la catégorie "Libéraux"), c'est que sur certaines questions de fond, historiques (l'anticléricalisme essentiellement), ils se placent à gauche. ], dans son ouvrage classique sur les droites, ne les considéraient certainement pas comme faisant partie des trois familles de la droite qu'il a isolé. En fait, les "républicains" historiques en France (Gambetta, etc.), à part pour ceux qui sont vraiment passés à droite (]), sont anticléricaux, et ça les place à gauche. En cas de menace sur la République (]), ils auront le "réflexe républicain", comme on appelle ça (celui-là même qui fit voter beaucoup de Français pour ] contre ] en 2002: entre un "voleur" et un "fasciste", on préfère quand même le voleur...). Durant le ], sans aucun doute à gauche, les Radicaux formaient le gouvernement avec la ], tandis que les communistes soutenaient sans participer. Les trois familles de droite, quant à elle, partagent aussi des traits historiques, et ce n'est que depuis (relativement) peu de temps qu'elles ont véritablement accepté la République (et donc que la différence avec les Radicaux s'estompt -- and therefore that the difference with the Radicals is getting blurred). Mais, jusqu'à ], et même au-delà, la guerre d'Algérie (cf. l'] et la crise de mai 1958, qui amena de Gaulle au pouvoir), aucun républicain, qu'il soit radical ou socialiste, au Parti RAdical, parti de notables, ou bien à la SFIO, parti de masse socialiste, n'avaient véritablement confiance en ces droites. Bref, le clivage entre gauche et droite reste la République, et même si aujourd'hui presque tous commencent à admettre notre régime de démocratie libérale, je pense qu'historiquement et encore aujourd'hui, les Radicaux doivent entrer dans la case "socialistes". Peut-être serait-ce plus simple si l'on créait une ] et ], afin de bien montrer la spécificité du clivage français par rapport à la notion qu'en a un Américain ou un Canadien. Cordialement, ] 00:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 219, July 2024 ==
::PS: aucun rapport, mais puisque tu parles Roumain, peut-être que tu serais intéressé à transcrire les informations intéressantes au sujet des liens supposés entre Ceaucescu et ], que j'avais trouvé dans . J'ai essayé d'en tirer ce que je pouvais en fonction de ce que j'arrivais à comprendre, mais s'il y a des détails additionnels, même à rajouter au conditionnel, ça pourrait être très intéressant... ] 00:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


{| style="width: 100%;"
== ] ==
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1233850911 -->


== Eugene Sârbu ==
Je te remercie d'avoir traduit l'article ]. J'en suis très honoré. Ça me fait plaisir de constater que les traductions ne sont pas toutes à sens unique en => le reste du monde :-). Cette page devrait évoluer bientôt parce qu'un livre sur la ] va sortir, je l'ai pas encore vu mais je le guête... ]


] died, a violinist who made an international career, with star names among his teachers, and still has no article in German, French, not even Romanian. If you have a bit of time, might you check if some of the Romanian teachers could have an interlanguage link. With a bit more time, check for refs in Romanian and add? - The Strad obit reads pretty much like a mirror of our article, therefore I don't trust it too much ;) - I'll have more time for him next week. -- ] (]) 11:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
== ] ==
*I'll look into that, also at some point over the coming days. What strikes me for now is that his birth name was "Eugen" with no final "e", and there are plenty of Romanian sources, rich in detail, referring to him under that name. "Eugene" seems to be an Anglicization, but then "Eugene Sârbu" is an unusual variant, since it preserves the diacritic on "â" ''after'' Anglicizing the first name. What page name should we hold on to, in your assessment? -- we also have "Eugene Sarbu" or "Eugen Sârbu". (Let's note in passing that "Eugen Sîrbu" with a "î" was also a variant used in Romania until he was well into his forties, when "â" made a comeback). ] (]) 14:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
*: ... and - to make things worse - the QEC has an diacritic on the first name (only): --] (]) 14:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
*::Well yeah, but that looks like it's a full-on Francization, as in "]". ] (]) 14:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
*::: Understand, - back to your original question: the most cited refs - Grove and Strad - have Eugene, Grove has the surname with diacritic, Strad without. I haven't looked at recordings much. For the moment I'd go by Grove, and you can please make a footnote about variants. --] (]) 14:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)


== ITN recognition for ] ==
None of your points make it patent nonsense. That he's a journalist for a local paper is irrelevant. That the article is made by him is irrelevant, not to mention that we have several of those (see, for example, ] and ]). It says he's a politician, maybe he's a notable one. I don't know, but it sure isn't patent nonsense. If you think it should be deleted, take it through ]. ] ] 22:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


{{ivmbox
==A Vlach She Wolf?==
|1=On 29 July 2024, ''''']''''' was updated with an item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the ]. ] (]) 22:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}


==DYK for Fănuș Neagu==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that writer ''']''' ''(pictured)'' claimed to have spent the ] stranded with a feral wolf on the roof of a cannery?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 220, August 2024 ==
Baza populara a miscarilor de extrema dreapta in Romania a fost mult mai mare decat se accepta printr-o istorie inca nu bine studiata. '''Ce stim noi de "Lupoaica", organizatie de dreapta a aromanilor din Grecia, care au pactizat cu ocupantii italieni''', ca apoi o intreaga comunitate sa "beneficieze" de reactia violenta a grecilor, in marea lor majoritate antifascisti. ]


{| style="width: 100%;"
What do we really know about 'Lupoaica' (She Wolf)? a right-wing organization of the Aromanians of Greece who sided with the Italian rulers of Greece? ] 08:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1237615006 -->


== Voting for coordinators is now open! ==
== ] ==


Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available ]. If you are interested in running, please sign up ''']''' by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the ]. ] (]) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
: ''(rm cat: will add to ])
<!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1242481883 -->
Thanks for spotting the above; as you've probably guessed, I'm currently working my way through ] (formerly "Victims of Nazi justice") removing any (hopefully all) articles that may be categorised under ]. (Cf ])


== Emil Isac article ==
Does ] seem a reasonable name / parent category?


“Isac was affiliated with Almanahul Literar before 1949, when it was redesigned as Steaua monthly (for long still the only Romanian-language literary periodical published in Cluj)”
Thanks again, ] 18:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


“Almanahul literar” did not exist before 1949, it had its first number in December 1949, and was renamed “Steaua” in April 1954 (both numbers are accessible at the digital library of Babeș-Bolyai University). Isac died in March 1954, so it was called “Steaua after he had passed away. Have a great day! ] (]) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
: ''...The name is perfect, IMO, as it is both comprehensive and neutral. In the future, perhaps a ] could be added and included in there as a subcat, so all possible meanings of the term "killed" are covered, and the relation between political repression in Nazi Germany and contrasting political groups may be established. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. ] 18:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. I'll keep your page on my watchlist as a reminder to let you know when I've finished trawling through ]. I don't know how many articles there are or might be about murdered SA members, but beyond Röhm and maybe one or two others, I wouldn't've thought it was that many...? &nbsp;Regards, ] 22:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
:I am not sure how many there were, actually. I was looking through pages for Nazis a while back, and it struck me that articles had been created for several of them. But, yes, I am not sure if they could form a distinct subcat. ] 20:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 221, September 2024 ==
== ] ==


{| style="width: 100%;"
Hi! I noticed that you have included the article on ] in the Ghica family category. Are you sure that he is part of the family, because it could be just a name coincidence (I don't know anything about his relation to the Ghica family)? You can answer here, I'm watching your talk page. TX ] 20:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
:Hi. I had checked with the . The also features Ghika under the name "Ghica", and it is very unlikely that the name was used by any other family in Romania. I am not 100% sure, but others seem to be. In fact, the name is so rare outside of the family, that it seems likely there would have been mention of him "not being related to them" in the article - even over a mention of him being related to it. ] 20:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
{|
::I have just noticed you are Romanian, so part of my explanation is superfluous (just so you don't think I'm being condescendent, and "explaining to you how we hand out names to our own" :)). I think the mention of his noble ancestry might have either turned into "the elephant in the room that we do not speak about" under communist rule, or it was swallowed by the carlessness many Romanian sources have in not explaining something which they hold to be "self-evident". ] 20:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 21:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1245852550 -->


== Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! ==
Yep, I thought so too (though I have to recognise I didn't look further into it), just trying to make sure :-). By the way, thanks for the nice job you are doing cathegorising and copy-editing articles (I also noticed your fine work on copy-editing ] and ] a while ago). Now, you probably do other good things too, but this is just what I noticed :-) ] 23:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
:Many thanks. I was feeling a bit weary of those articles, since my knowledge of mathematics tends towards zero, but you confirm that I have found the proper links for mathematical concepts. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. ] 23:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote ''']''' by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! ] (]) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1245948375 -->


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 222, October 2024 ==
== Phanariotes ==


{| style="width: 100%;"
I do not know what Miskin has suggested. From what I understand he suggested that the article on Phanariotes should also cover contemporary greek presence in Instabul. If this is the case I obviously agree with you that this kind of info has nothing to do with an article on Phanariotes.
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
By the way, right now im away from home and dont have access to any books/libraries- by mid-june i return to greece. if you like by that time we could collaborate a bit on the article on phanariotes or other history articles.best--] 17:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1251426010 -->


== Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year ==
hi again.
a)regarding nations, we share the same point of view. im glad to have met you, cause there are few (balkan) ppl in wikipedia who write on balkan history from a non-nationalist point of view. so keep up the good work!


Nominations now open for the ] ] and ] awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open ] and ] respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via ] (]) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
b)about vladimirescu- from what i know, indeed, few greek writers did not accuse him of "anti-greek" stance. one is yannis scaribas and his book on the greek revolution. scaribas regarded vladimirescu as a leader of revolutionary peasants against the greek bourgeoisie (i dont know if this is true either, but at least it is not nationalist rhetoric!)
by the way, you can also email me if you like best--] 18:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1257656862 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
You should both read my last post on the article's Talk page, which says that I agree that contemporary Greek presence in Phanari is irrelevant to the subject. Dahn I think you're jumping into conclusions too quickly. You've been accusing me for wanting to point out contemporary presence and revive the "magale idea" only because I wrote "reside" in stead of "resided". I think this is a bit exaggerated from your part. I initially said that the Phanariotes are still the Greeks of Phanari as a response to you irrational claim that Phanariotes exist still as the Romanians with names such as "Palaeologus and Comnenus". This statement gave me the impression that you erroneously believed that Phanariotes was a name exclusively connected to the Greek Princes of Romania. I think your opinion on Phanariotes is a POV, which stems from the fact that they are connected to Romanian history. The fact is that all contemporary and modern sources label them ethnic Greeks, because that's what they were. Today's Romanian people who might decend from them have nothing to do with the ethnicity of the real Phanariotes. Your POV theories of "cosmopolitanism" vs "taking sides" obviously stems from there. For your information Etairia was primarily a Phanariote society whose mission statement was the "liberation of the motherland". ] 18:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
:"I agree that contemporary Greek presence in Phanari is irrelevant to the subject." If this is so, I apologize for having misunderstood your point of view. best--] 18:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Dahn: I do not understand why you think I might be insulted- just the opposite :) . i think communication might be easier through email, though.
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Of course I do not mind that you do not have an email account. "Romania-related pages are slowly turning into a war between various ethno-nationalisms". i agree that this is sad. "hopefully will not be getting lines crossed again" i wish you good luck, but i think this is a very difficult task to accomplish. in any case keep up the good work!--] 19:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
Dahn, I ve just added a comment on the Phanariots discussion page. Regarding Phanariots, I would like to see more information about their role in Ottoman administration, '''avoiding nationalist POV'''. personally, im not sure that the phanariots had a national identity/feeling. after all, some of them continued to serve the sultan long after the 1821 Revolution.
I also think it should be added to the page that some phanariots took part in the greek revolution and that Alexander Mavrokordatos (i think hes the grandson of the one mentioned in the site) became an influential greek politician. thats all i can contribute for now, cause as i ve told you, i dont have any books available.


</div>
Hi again. I also agree with all your points!
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 223, November 2024 ==
a)Their link with Romania ''is'' intrinsic and I do not think there is a serious historian(including Greeks) who doubts that.


{| style="width: 100%;"
b) They ''did'' come from various places in the Balkans.
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1256183913 -->


== Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards ==
c)Pls do not get upset with Miskin. Just cool down and reply with arguments as you did.--] 20:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


Voting is now open for the ] ] and ] awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes ] and ] respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via ] (]) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
I'm a Greek born in Constantinople myself and I could safely say that I've been well familiar and involved with this topic. The initial impression I had was that you and other editors were drawing conclusions on the Phanariotes via the Princes of the Danubian provinces. What I want to point out is they they were not the main representatives of the Phanariote society. Arguments of the type "Phanariotes remained in Romania and in Ottoman posts" cannot be used as an argument for their ethnicity. Neither can language. Although the vast majority was Greek-speaking, it's true that some might have been Hellenized, but then again how can you prove who's Greek and who's Hellenized? Kolokotronis and Bouboulina (principal heros of the Greek war of independence) were ] for example. The Phanariotes who became Romanian in that sense, are not historically regarded as Phanariotes but as Romanians, despite what their ancestry or name reveals. In the Ottoman Empire, the sole criterion of ethnicity was religion, not language. The subjects of the Patriarch of Constantinople were "Greek Orthodox", which was later simplified to "Greek national". Furthermore the vast majority of them, were Greek-speakers (although with great dialectic variation). Who worked with whom is also irrelevant, Greek interest was varied significantly during the 19th century. During the war of independence many Greeks from the island and Phanari opposed the revolution, in the long run the majority offered support and by the 20th century everyone would sing nationalist songs. In the long run, everything that went wrong in the Greek Kingdom was paid by the Greeks of Constantinople (Phanariots included). The etaria was in fact a Phanariote society, and this doesn't mean a society from the Princes of the Danubian provinces, but a society founded and preserved by the wider community of Phanariotes. I have a source right next to me that verifies this. I've got sources for all my claims and I'm sure I could find countless more. In fact I've never run into one which would say differently. Most of your ideas are based on the other hand are based on original research, and I think that providing personal arguments as an answer to POV is not an efficient method of resolving disputes. Maybe we should let the sources talk in our stead. ] 00:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1259903100 -->


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 224, December 2024 ==
"''Most chose to be Greeks, but reference to "Greeks" before that actually refers to Christian Orthodox who had a fond memory of the Christian Empire.''"<br>
However scholars do refer to them as Greeks, hence that the term wikipedia is obliged to use. See ]'s "The Age of Revolutions" to get my point. Your erroneous conclusions stem from unfamiliarity with Greek history and ethnicity. I think this discourse is leading us nowhere. Let us have scholars decide by citing sources. ] 01:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


{| style="width: 100%;"
Sorry but your views are a POV which doesn't reflect scholarly consensus. Phanariot is synonymous to Phanariot Greek, simple as that. Byzantine=phanariotes=modern greek is not a monopoly, it is a reality, and your personal convictions are irrelevant here (so are mine). Literally ''all'' europeans (including Russians) in the medieval world referred to byzantines as "modern Greeks" and it survived into the modern era. What you should question instead is the cultural connection between Byzantine/modern Greeks and classical Greece. That one was introduced for Romantic reasons. ] 01:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
* Op-ed: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1264992348 -->


==At last, the fresco is free==
Calm down Dahn, I never said nor implied that "nationalism blinds you from the truth" or anything like that. I don't even like using such terms. Your focus on Romanian history might have given you the wrong impression on the nature of Phanariotes. That wouldn't make you a nationalist. I only tried to clear a few things out, that is all. ] 01:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


Hello and Happy New Year! If I may suggest a mini-endeavor, since today is the day ] enters the public domain: his is ripe for uploading, and perhaps even using some of the images. (I already uploaded the rest of what I could find by him.) — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
It's not a bad thing to have a focus on Romanian history and a "de-focus" on Greek, it's something normal. Similarly I have a focus on Greek history, hence why I don't pretend to be an expert on Romanian. You pretend to be an expert on both, which is certainly not the case with the former. ] 20:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


:Tismaneanu, Efigii ale unui cosmar istoric, e-book, pp. 30-31. Humanitas, 2015, ISBN 9789735049539. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 07:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
== re Query on my talk page... ==
::At least three factories bore his name: , , . Source for Cluj: Albert Zsolt Jakab, Tudor Sălăgean, Constituirea memoriei şi practici comemorative: reprezentări ale memoriei culturale la Cluj, p. 198. Cluj-Napoca, Asociaţia Etnografică "Kriza János", 2022, ISBN 9786068377728 — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 21:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
:Breiner mentioned, extensively: . — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
::Many thanks, Biru, and a very happy new year to you too. You know, you can actually screenshot the Petrescu images from those sites and save them through Paint or the like (that's how I do it). My mind is elsewhere at the moment. ] (]) 08:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::For sure. One more detail, almost trivial but not quite, on page 206: . — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 09:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 225, January 2025 ==
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_10#Category:Far_right_politics_in_France :) ] 22:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


{| style="width: 100%;"
==Circassians==
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
I am intrigued by the claims of wiki as to the ] having been kicked out of Kossovo (in the eve of the 1999 Civil War which pillaged that province). I added my comment at
{|
].
| ]
I wonder if ] Dahn or ] for that matter can come over above and share with us their expertize (or antything they might happen to know) on this matter. I am calling upon the so-called ] speaker ] too should he hear my cry of anguish since he claims he is a geographer and lives indeed close to the disputed area in ]. Many thanks in advance! ] 17:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
* Op-ed: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 07:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1266423875 -->

Latest revision as of 07:16, 13 January 2025

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.


Archives

This user declares his annoyance at browsing through articles initiated by US or UK users which fail to mention that the theme has to do with one of the two countries (arguably because they assume that English language wiki means "English/American wiki").

Twigs on branches

Well, here is the (hopefully useful) Tașcu entry… — Biruitorul 18:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

While we’re at it. Author: Dumitru Micu. — Biruitorul 15:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
I also picked up some other stuff, more or less randomly:
Pamfil Ș (why not?), by Iordan Datcu;
Various Scena variants by Ana-Maria Brezuleanu, Alexandru Farcaș, Ion Istrate;
And two from vol. E/K: Karnabatt two three (Florin Faifer);
and Adolf de Herz (Călin Teutișan). — Biruitorul 11:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Tita 1 2, author Alexandru Teodorescu, vol. S/T (like all of these)
Teodorescu-Braniște 1 2 3, Ofelia Ichim
Păstorel 1 2 3 4, Nicolae Mecu
Tafrali 1 2 3, Călin Teutișan (bonus: Talaz, by Eugen Onu) — Biruitorul 15:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Wow! Big thanks! Dahn (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Here is the Scînteia stuff: , , , , , ,
Authors: Tudor Hăndăbuț, Ioan Milea, Magda Wächter, Nicolae Bârna (no idea who I. T. is; not in the index). Also, see Demeter Ritter von Tuschinski. — Biruitorul 08:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

As this was rescued from the archive, how about we celebrate with a couple from vol. C/D?

Deșliu: , . Author: Nicolae Mecu

Caraion: , , , , . Author: Laurențiu Hanganu. — Biruitorul 15:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Fănuș, Volume L/O, author Dumitru Micu: , , , , . — Biruitorul 10:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

And here is Sasu; author: Radu G. Țeposu. Biruitorul 10:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Micu is more eminently usable than RGT, who is by now a bit redundant to what's already present and more detailed in the text. Dahn (talk) 11:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
My pleasure. One point: my understanding is that Simion only authored the short italicized quotation on p. 561, and that Micu (based on the credit on 562) is the sole author of the entry. — Biruitorul 22:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Will amend in my next edits. Dahn (talk) 22:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Raicu: , , , . Author Alexandra Ciocârlie, vol. P/R. — Biruitorul 10:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

A bit of Tușinschi spam has crept back in here. I do like the “Prof. Dr.” on the new photo. — Biruitorul 20:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

  • @Biruitorul: În altă ordine de idei, do you happen to have a DGLR entry on Cavarnali? Or an a fella by the name of Liviu Bratoloveanu? Dahn (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
    Unfortunately, not right now: I’m physically rather far from any DGLR volumes. In about six weeks’ time — say October 1 at the latest — I’ll have them for you. Biruitorul 16:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
    So, I have quite the update. Some kind soul uploaded DLGR last year, in its entirety. It’s the 2016 edition, ISBN 978-973-167-381-3 for the first volume, A/B. (Cavarnali doesn’t have an entry.) , Here’s Bratoloveanu, author Victor Durnea.
    The link is here. I know you’re not an Internet Archive fan, but at least this is the section without a subscription required, and I suppose it beats waiting until autumn. Biruitorul 22:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
    Excellent, and thank you for this find! (As it happens, I don't dislike them, I just happened to be annoyed by some guy's unhinged claim that I should subscribe on IA to verify random DYK hooks, just in case the paper source is there.) Dahn (talk) 06:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Some help

Hi Dahn, hope you're well. With this message I expose myself further as a talk page stalker, hope you don't mind... Above you mentioned Arcanum, a great resource that I am surprised I had never heard about before. I've found there many newspapers talking about marginal figures, which probably duplicates the amount of sources about them that I thought existed. One such figure is George Ceara (or Ceară), an Aromanian poet. He seems to be related to a modern Aromanian poet, Ilie A. Ceara (or Ceară, likewise). I had planned writing a page for George for months but couldn't find any source explaining their relation. Only once I found a book snippet which I dismissed anyway because I think I deemed it to be inappropriate (maybe it was a primary source, I don't remember anymore) believing I could find something better, but I haven't been able to. Could you help me out? I see both have many results in Arcanum, does any explain the relation between the two? Regards, Super Ψ Dro 12:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Super, and thanks for stalking me, as well as for all the wonderful work you're putting in! This piece by Emil Lazăr-Dejeanul has the following: De reţinut este şi faptul că unul dintre cei 7 fraţi şi o soră a tatălui lui Ilie Ceară a făcut Facultatea de Litere din Bucureşti şi a ajuns profesor, atât în şcolile din România, cât şi în Grecia de Nord, dar şi un cunoscut poet de expresie română şi aromână cu numele George Ceară. Nepotul acestuia, scriitorul Ilie Ceară, încă de la vârsta de 5 ani a ajuns orfan de tată, orfan şi de mamă. (Citation Emil Lazăr-Dejeanul, "Scriitorul aromân Ilie Ceară", in Astra Dejeană, Vol. VII, Issues 3–4, December 2000, p. 14). Dahn (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
This is exactly what I needed. Thank you so much for the help! Best, Super Ψ Dro 21:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
By the way Dahn, what pages does "Scriitorul aromân Ilie Ceară" cover in the magazine? Just for the sake of exact citing. Super Ψ Dro 19:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Just page 14. Dahn (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Ilie Purcaru

On 28 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ilie Purcaru, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ilie Purcaru, as a contributor to Nicolae Ceaușescu's cult of personality, claimed that a young Ceaușescu had walked into the woods of Scornicești without fearing their wolves? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ilie Purcaru. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ilie Purcaru), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:18th-century Wallachian poets has been nominated for splitting

Category:18th-century Wallachian poets has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 218, June 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Alexandru Talex

On 15 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexandru Talex, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexandru Talex was described as "the gentlest" member of a Romanian far-right organization? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexandru Talex. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alexandru Talex), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for another good one! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

József Fischer

Hello! I created an article about József Fischer, a prominent leader of the Jewish Party (Romania). If you would like to expand, please feel free to do that, since I found only incomplete information about his political involvement in Romania. Norden1990 (talk) 20:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

@Norden1990: A general advice, if I may: the sources I used in writing the Jewish Party article have more in-depth coverage about the Fischers than the prose required there. I would suggest that, instead of repeating the content you have found in the article, you have a fresh look at the sources cited which you can check yourself (Frojimovics et al, presumably), and complete the research with detail that should not go into the party article, but needs to appear in a biography. Otherwise, the article just looks like a transplant of info. Dahn (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I do not speak nor write Romanian, and my knowledge of the Romanian political system between the two world wars is extremely limited. The person was interesting to me because of his activities in Hungary during the Holocaust. --Norden1990 (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
@Norden1990: There is absolutely nothing unfortunate about that, you are actually of immense value to this project as a Hungarian-speaker (and of course, for many other reasons). I kindly ask that you reread what I wrote: it is precisely to ask that you please focus more of the article on sources that are only marginally used in Jewish Party (Romania) (I mentioned Frojimovics et al, which has some more coverage of the Fischers than was needed in the JP article, and which was published in English -- you only seem to have used and duplicated the parts that I had cited in the JP article); it is also to encourage you to also search and use sources in Hungarian that were not used in the JP article (and which will presumably have much, much more to say about Fischer and the other Fischers). That is my vision for the article, if you will. Dahn (talk) 03:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

WP:AN

When a discussion is closed, you should not edit it. By continuing the discussion to prove some point you have simply further escalated the issue. As I mentioned in the close, there are other more appropriate venues to resolve your disagreement, continued discussion at WP:AN risks sanctions against you both if you can't disengage. Polyamorph (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@Polyamorph: I was simply editing in my response exactly while the discussion was being closed -- I probably entered the editing window exactly after your closure, not noticing that it had been closed in that 9-minute interval. When I noticed that it had been closed, I had already written in my answers, and I frankly have no idea what the proper procedure is for that situation. You can of course remove my answers and re-close, but I would kindly encourage you to give me the benefit of the doubt. Dahn (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Ștefan Tita

On 5 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ștefan Tita, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that educational writer Ștefan Tita gave Romanian students impractical advice on mending damaged bark with bandages of dirt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ștefan Tita. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ștefan Tita), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Adding citations

Hi. When you're adding entries to articles like 2011 in literature, it's mandatory to include an inline citation. I've just added one for you but it would be really helpful if you could remember to do so in future. I'm aware that many of the older pages have some citations missing, because this rule didn't always exist, but if we can at least keep the more recent years fully referenced, it will improve matters. Deb (talk) 08:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

@Deb: Has it dawned on anyone so far that basic biographical facts are referenced (or should be referenced) in the articles themselves (you can easily pick them up from there, in all articles I contribute), and that adding a string of redundant citations needlessly duplicates the text? This is why I don't consider this mandatory, and would rather not have myself bound by it. I will of course continue to cite all facts I introduce in other sections of those pages, as I have always in the past. Dahn (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, it has been much discussed and the decision was made in 2018. It's fine not to consider yourself bound by it, but be aware that your contributions can be removed, by anyone, at any time, if you don't include the citation. Deb (talk) 10:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I would imagine it absurd to remove an "uncited" fact that is perfectly cited in the article, but yeah, okay. On the other hand, there is nothing absolutely prevenring anyone from removing cited facts as well, particularlt on pages that are so evidently unpatrolled, and completely chaotic in content. I'll take my chances. Dahn (talk) 11:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Also: can we talk about what is mandatory in citations when you guys agree to at least consistently enforce a single citation format over all such pages, or at the very least over one page? Dahn (talk) 10:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
By "you guys", I'm assuming you mean the Misplaced Pages community, which includes you. It's open to you to raise the matter any time you choose. Deb (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
No, just the guys who look after those particular pages. I have limited time to spend of such chores, but surely now that you are aware of this issue, and have noticed the anomaly (as for instance in the clash of styles between the citations you have added regarding Neagu, and the rest of the citations on that very page), you might start whatever procedure is required to fix it. Dahn (talk) 11:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Nobody "looks after" pages - everyone is expected to. If you don't have time, you can drop out of the project without recrimination. Deb (talk) 11:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
You mean I should stop contributing to wikipedia because I didn't add citations to basic facts on those pages? If so, permit me to inform you that you are out of line. And yes: there are users who take a constant interest in the "in literature" pages, to which I only have a passing interest. Now: are we just about done here? Dahn (talk) 11:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, you should stop contributing to wikipedia if you don't add citations to basic facts. WP:V is non-negotiable. The WP:BURDEN to provide citations is on you if you edit. If you don't add citations, you can and should be blocked from editing. You've been around far too long not to understand this. And yes, we are done here. Toddst1 (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Before you get off my page and on to your business, please clarify how you came across this talk page and decided to go directly into taunts and faux warnings. Have we even interacted before? Dahn (talk) 17:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay, here's the deal: As a rule, I contribute massively with cited content, including the entire article that I linked to on 2011 in literature -- namely, Fănuș Neagu. I view the citations as redundant on "in literature" pages, as long as they are cited inline in the articles. I do not prevent anyone from adding citations (such as pasting them from the linked article that was written and referenced by me), or citation needed tags, or even removing the facts that are "not referenced" there, on the "in literature" pages. As utterly ridiculous as that is, especially when weighed against the fact that all birth and death sections on the "in literature" pages were originally unrefenced.

And no: adding unsourced content, even if I had been doing that, is not a blockable offense.

That said, let me make this very clear: haranguing and trolling me on my user page is a really bad idea, as is the suggestion that I should leave wikipedia, or be blocked from editing, for not embracing your pet peeves. Continue commenting here, particularly in this manner, and I will gladly escalate the matter (as much as I detest ANI etc procedures). Have a good day. Dahn (talk) 17:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Eugene Sârbu

Eugene Sârbu died, a violinist who made an international career, with star names among his teachers, and still has no article in German, French, not even Romanian. If you have a bit of time, might you check if some of the Romanian teachers could have an interlanguage link. With a bit more time, check for refs in Romanian and add? - The Strad obit reads pretty much like a mirror of our article, therefore I don't trust it too much ;) - I'll have more time for him next week. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

  • I'll look into that, also at some point over the coming days. What strikes me for now is that his birth name was "Eugen" with no final "e", and there are plenty of Romanian sources, rich in detail, referring to him under that name. "Eugene" seems to be an Anglicization, but then "Eugene Sârbu" is an unusual variant, since it preserves the diacritic on "â" after Anglicizing the first name. What page name should we hold on to, in your assessment? -- we also have "Eugene Sarbu" or "Eugen Sârbu". (Let's note in passing that "Eugen Sîrbu" with a "î" was also a variant used in Romania until he was well into his forties, when "â" made a comeback). Dahn (talk) 14:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
    ... and - to make things worse - the QEC has an diacritic on the first name (only): Eugène Sarbu --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
    Well yeah, but that looks like it's a full-on Francization, as in "Eugène Ionesco". Dahn (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
    Understand, - back to your original question: the most cited refs - Grove and Strad - have Eugene, Grove has the surname with diacritic, Strad without. I haven't looked at recordings much. For the moment I'd go by Grove, and you can please make a footnote about variants. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Eugene Sârbu

On 29 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Eugene Sârbu, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Fănuș Neagu

On 12 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fănuș Neagu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that writer Fănuș Neagu (pictured) claimed to have spent the Romanian floods of May 1970 stranded with a feral wolf on the roof of a cannery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fănuș Neagu. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fănuș Neagu), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Emil Isac article

“Isac was affiliated with Almanahul Literar before 1949, when it was redesigned as Steaua monthly (for long still the only Romanian-language literary periodical published in Cluj)”

“Almanahul literar” did not exist before 1949, it had its first number in December 1949, and was renamed “Steaua” in April 1954 (both numbers are accessible at the digital library of Babeș-Bolyai University). Isac died in March 1954, so it was called “Steaua after he had passed away. Have a great day! Rummycove (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 223, November 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 224, December 2024

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

At last, the fresco is free

Hello and Happy New Year! If I may suggest a mini-endeavor, since today is the day Costin Petrescu (painter) enters the public domain: his Athenaeum fresco is ripe for uploading, and perhaps even using some of the images. (I already uploaded the rest of what I could find by him.) — Biruitorul 17:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Tismaneanu, Efigii ale unui cosmar istoric, e-book, pp. 30-31. Humanitas, 2015, ISBN 9789735049539. Biruitorul 07:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
At least three factories bore his name: Cluj, Timisoara, Brasov. Source for Cluj: Albert Zsolt Jakab, Tudor Sălăgean, Constituirea memoriei şi practici comemorative: reprezentări ale memoriei culturale la Cluj, p. 198. Cluj-Napoca, Asociaţia Etnografică "Kriza János", 2022, ISBN 9786068377728 — Biruitorul 21:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Breiner mentioned, extensively: . — Biruitorul 20:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Many thanks, Biru, and a very happy new year to you too. You know, you can actually screenshot the Petrescu images from those sites and save them through Paint or the like (that's how I do it). My mind is elsewhere at the moment. Dahn (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
For sure. One more detail, almost trivial but not quite, on page 206: . — Biruitorul 09:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)