Misplaced Pages

Talk:Stephanie Adams: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:56, 25 May 2006 editFreplySpang (talk | contribs)24,796 edits []: me too← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:14, 10 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,882,812 editsm blpo=yes + blp=no/null → blp=other; cleanupTag: AWB 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old XfD multi
{{oldafdfull|date=]|result='''speedy keep'''}}
|date1 = April 27 2006 |result1 = '''speedy keep''' |page1 = Stephanie Adams
|date2 = August 25 2011 |result2 = '''Redirect to ]''' |page2 = Stephanie Adams (2nd nomination)
|date3 = August 4 2012 |result3 = '''procedurally closed without a result''' |page3 = Stephanie Adams (3rd nomination)
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|blp=other|listas=Adams, Stephanie|1=
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Fashion|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject New Jersey|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject African diaspora |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|style=long|topic=blp}}
{{ITN talk|date=20 May 2018|oldid=842166856}}
{{Annual readership|days=90}}
{{Archives|auto=short|search=yes|index=User:ClueBot III/Master Detailed Indices/Talk:Stephanie Adams|bot=ClueBot III|age=365}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|age=8760|archiveprefix=Talk:Stephanie Adams/Archive|numberstart=6|maxarchsize=120000|header={{Automatic archive navigator}}|minkeepthreads=8|minarchthreads=1|format= %%i}}
{{Archive basics
|archive = Talk:Stephanie Adams/Archive %(counter)d
|counter = 6
|headerlevel = 2
|maxarchivesize = 120K
|archiveheader = {{Aan}}
}}<!-- 10:19 August 19, 2018 (UTC), Sam Sailor added ] -->


== Fully to Semi ==
The archives of this page can be found at:
*]
*If you want to reply to an old topic, please move it back to this page.


I really think the admin who reduced the protection of this page is asking for more disruption and frivolity. The article was "quiet" for so long only because of the full protection level. This bio is probably being being wiki watched and secretly watched by so many people, it might be best to remain cautious. Just my opinion. ] (]) 23:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
=="GODDESSY" or "Goddessy"?==


Hmmmm, what is this link directly below my post about psychotherapy? It must be a technical error because I did not post it. Can someone please fix it? Cheers ] (]) 23:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Much of this section is copied from ]. I didn't move it, thinking that the archive might make a bit more sense without its removal. -- ] 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


:The link was a reference. Now (I had it dumped above, where it belonged). -- ] (]) 06:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
===Capitals===
:There are only under indefinite full protection and only one (because of an Arbcom case) had that protection set before July 2014. Articles simply shouldn't be indefinitely fully protected and then forgotten. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
While ] is of course fully entitled to her choice of orthography for her username, there's no reason for the article to refer to her/Adams's company, website, etc. as "GODDESSY", unless perhaps it's primarily referred to in conversation as "gee-oh-dee-dee-ee-ess-ess-wie", which I find hard to believe. Compare ], for example: the last time I looked, the company was consistently referring to itself as "SONY", and Misplaced Pages rightly ignores this. -- ] 07:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
::Speaking as the unprotecting admin, I assure you that this article is being watched by more than one administrator to make sure the unprotection doesn't go wrong. Given the article's history, this was never going to be an unprotect-and-run. If anything does go wrong now, renewed protection (or pending changes, or any necessary blocks or topic bans) can be applied as soon as they're needed by any of the admins who are supervising here. ] (]) 15:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


Much appreciation in regards to the responses. Cheers. ] (]) 20:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
PS on URLs, see ]. -- ] 02:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
:PPS (i) I later noticed that in the US (which isn't where I happen to live), Sony does now call itself "Sony". But Sanyo still systematically calls itself "SANYO". (ii) For URLs, see the talk archive page; but in brief, I point out that ''domain names'' are ''not'' case-sensitive (though what follows the first single slash is indeed case-sensitive). -- ] 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
===Capitalization===


I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
Previously, the page referred repeatedly to "GODDESSY", all in caps. I changed this to "Goddessy". My rationale was given above, under the title "]". The users who sign their contributions "GODDESSY" didn't respond directly, but they did reply under "]": "GODDESSY is placed in all caps for a reason, as clearly sited here: http://www.GODDESSY.com/PressInformation/GODDESSYAndSorceress.htm (URL is case sensitive, so place GODDESSY in caps.)"
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.villagevoice.com/specials/bestof/2004/detail.php?id=4041


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
I've commented on URLs ]. As for the FULL CAPS other than in URLs, GODDESSYAndSorceress.htm tells us: ''"GODDESSY" is placed in all capital letters in order to stress the importance of spirituality in life. Whether we choose to or not, we all go through some sort of spiritual journey.''


{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}
To me, this is pretty close to saying "We write GODDESSY in full caps as we think it's very important." And that, I imagine, is why ] systematically uses "SANYO" on . Adams is, or Goddessy is, or the Goddessy people are, fully entitled to write "GODDESSY" on her/their own site, just as Sanyo is fully entitled to write "SANYO" on its own site. But just as WP is right to say "Sanyo", WP is right to say "Goddessy".


Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 09:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Is this so complex? Does it really require "mediation"?


== Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2018 ==
(As I've said above, the writing of the ''username'' GODDESSY is an entirely different matter; I've no objection to it.) -- ] 06:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Stephanie Adams|answered=yes}}
And in answering to the question of if the name "GODDESSY" is so complex that it requires mediation, you just answered your own question by bringing the subject back up again. GODDESSY is legally registered as a business as "GODDESSY" and the explanation to why GODDESSY is placed in all caps is provided. Every single book cover written by Adams that has GODDESSY on its cover reads "GODDESSY" , so "GODDESSY" is accurate.
Stephanie Adams died this morning. <ref>https://nypost.com/2018/05/18/playboy-playmate-took-young-son-on-fatal-leap-from-nyc-building/</ref> ] (]) 16:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}


:I would like to wait on this edit until an official spokesman states what happened. Anonymous sources close to the investigation aren't really BLP-compliant. --] 16:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
No further comments and thank you for your time.


::'''Not yet.''' Further, the sources currently reporting this story are the ''New York Post'' and the ''National Enquirer''—hardly the bastions of the journalism industry or models of ]. If the ''Times'' runs a story, then I think we can mention something, but right now, I don't think it's in keeping with ] to add this yet. —''']''' (]) 16:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
-]


::<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> ABC news is reporting the story based on "police sources". I think we're getting closer to meeting the RS/V/BLP standards and might be there; do you? —''']''' (]) 16:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
===Capitalization of "Goddessy" (other than in the username, of course)===
:::Dead after a fall, I'd consider verified. Jumped, I wouldn't. --] 16:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
User:GODDESSY points us to the same web page on whose content I have already commented. Every book by Adams is marked "GODDESSY", all caps? Well, every product from Sanyo is marked "SANYO", all caps. The capitalization is important to Adams/Goddessy and Sanyo respectively; it's not important to Misplaced Pages. -- ] 08:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*I propose the following text for the personal life section, with no mention in the intro at this time (other than to add the date):
::On the evening of May 17, 2018, Adams and her son checked into a 25th-floor penthouse in the Gotham Hotel. The next morning, both were found dead on a second-floor balcony. Law enforcement officials are still investigating but say they apparently jumped.(cite news for this AP story: )
:<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> Representative and verifiable? —''']''' (]) 16:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
::{{re|C.Fred}} First two sentences good - last one not verifiable, imho. --] 17:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
:::<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> Unless ABC and the AP are talking to the same people, we've got multiple media outlets' sources saying the same thing. That's why I attributed and hendged with "apparently". —''']''' (]) 17:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
::::{{re|C.Fred}} Given the apparent history of domestic violence, I'm very hesitant to say anything. And I'll bet you they ''are'' talking to the same people - I'd like to hope there's a minimal number of people willing to blab about an investigation in progress. --17:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::Valid point about DV. I've added the two sentences and source to the article, I've added the {{tl|Recent death}} template, and I've placed a comment in the Personal life section suggesting that people don't add a cause or speculative cause at this point and pointing them to this discussion. —''']''' (]) 17:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::Looks good. Thanks. --] 17:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::::In the serious RS now. I won't be editing this as I used to know her. ] (]) 14:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)


== murder-suicide ==


This , restores text describing an incident as murder-suicide. Objective3000 then removes this text (twice) with an edit summary saying ''“Not good sources. Only a trial judge can rule murder as it's a class of crimes. Good sources say the coroner ruled it a homicide, which is not a crime but a cause of death.”'' AFAIK, ''People'' is a reliable source. There are other reliable sources also using “murder-suicide” as well. So that should put this issue of “not good sources” to bed. As far as “only a trial judge can rule murder” goes, that’s an ''opinion'' of an editor, and it’s pure hogwash. We use reliable sources at Misplaced Pages, not editor conjecture. I’m restoring the phrase.
:Well if "it's not important to Misplaced Pages", but it is important to the founder of GODDESSY who clearly places the explanation for the name being in all caps (something ] does not do) on the web site as well as the book covers , then it should remain.
:The NYPost says ''“The former Playboy Playmate who killed herself and her 7-year-old son in a murder-suicide leap Friday was distraught because she couldn’t take the kid to Europe for the summer, a close friend told The Post.”''. People says ''The deaths of a former Playboy playmate and her 7-year-old son have been ruled a murder-suicide after the woman jumped with the boy from a New York City hotel on Friday, officials say.'' Both use the phrase. Both are considered reliable sources.] (]) 06:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
:{{diff2|843360366|And again}}. A medical examiner's finding is not an "allegation". <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 17:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
::The medical examiner did not call it a murder-suicide. He called it a homicide. ] (]) 17:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
::{{yo|That man from Nantucke}}, I’ve asked for guidance at ]. ] (]) 17:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
:::Why does this feel like the goalposts are moving? AFAIK there is no legal definition of a murder-suicide, but even if there were one it doesn’t matter. In this case we have multiple secondary sources (e.g. People) reporting on what a primary source (“officials”) said. How did those officials make their statement? Was it an email? A phone call? A press conference? Carrier pigeon? It doesn’t matter. We trust People got this correct. ''They'' classified the deaths as a murder-suicide.
::::No moving of goalposts whatsoever. We now have six sources that say the medical examiner said homicide, not murder-suicide. And, ''People'' is a celebrity mag, not a news source. ] (]) 10:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::I beg to differ. Your edit summaries {{tq|Not good sources. Only a trial judge can rule murder as it's a class of crimes. Good sources say the coroner ruled it a homicide, which is not a crime but a cause of deat}} and {{tq|Ruled a homicide, not a murder. A coroner cannot rule murder }}are an attempt to override reliable sources, based upon your opinion of NY law. I think it’s fair to say at this point that you are the only one holding this opinion and it flies in the face of how we use reliable sources. We have multiple sources labeling this a murder-suicide. ''People'' is definitely a reliable source, your opinion notwithstanding. So are the other two sources. And while the deaths have been labeled a homicide, murder is also a homicide. It doesn’t matter if a court has yet to weigh in on this because we have multiple reliable sources reporting that NYC officials have ruled this a murder-suicide.] (]) 16:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::You have provided ONE source that says the medical examiner called this murder-suicide. I provided SIX that he called it a homicide. And, I am not trying to rewrite NY law. I am repeating the legal definition of homicide in all 50 states as per Findlaw. and the ]. ] (]) 16:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


==Category: American murderers of children==
:Also, we took at look at the ] page and noted that the name change was not disputed. In the case of ], it is.
I added this category and then reverted myself when I saw that it had been challenged before by Objective3000 based on the grounds that "no court has ruled it a murder". Based on this logic should we removed the categories for "American female murderers", "2018 murders in the United States", and "Murder–suicides in the United States"? ]<sup> ]</sup> 06:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

:Cats are often loosely defined. But, they should probably be removed. ] (]) 11:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
:Keep in mind that there is not ''one voice'' for Misplaced Pages, so your feeling about this might not be the same as others.
:They've been added back since the discussion above. I didn't add them back, but they should be there. The one and only standard English phrase for her action is "]", a phrase that would not exist if the criminal law technicalities were the sole standard, since dead people are never found guilty of anything at all in most modern court systems. Saying that she's not a murderer allows not just criminal legal procedure, but even the lack of criminal legal procedure, to override uncontroverted facts to the point that it violates ]. Misplaced Pages has no legal obligation to allow a person to permanently veto recognition and labeling of their own evil by choosing to die before some official sticker can be placed on their heads. --] (]) 19:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

::Only the medical examiner didn't call it a murder-suicide. ] (]) 20:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
:Regards,

:-]

User:GODDESSY (below, UG) is again touting the company's own explanation for CAPITALIZATION. I've already read and commented on it. What UG doesn't repeat is an assertion I missed the first time around, that: ''GODDESSY is legally registered as a business as "GODDESSY".'' Can we see any evidence of this? (Is it perhaps to distinguish the company from ?) Actually the company related to Adams is a bit of a mystery, as it nowhere seems to supply its street address (although it's possible I have missed something). -- ] 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

== Treading cautiously ==

I haven't edited this before, but see from the archive that that there was a huge edit war, then Jimbo blew away most of the previous article with the comment . I'll be doing that. If anyone has objections, please bring them up, I don't have any dogs in this fight, don't intend to edit war, and will discuss happily.

So far I added back those books that I could find ISBNs for on Amazon or Barnes & Noble, which, I imagine, would be considered "verifiable sources". Adams's site also mentions 2007 astrology books and ''Happenings'', but I haven't found them elsewhere yet. ] 14:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

Keeps reverting to the Jimbo version and his/her edit summaries are labelled ''"Reverted BACK to JIMBO WALES, as per his talk page, LEAVE THIS PAGE ALONE AS IT IS NOW. Want to Edit it? Fine, get banned, even admins"'', and ''"Don't even make me log on and get my blocking stick kids, this isn't a joke, leave it."''. Not only to they sound like out of wiki process threats, they are ridiculous. The object of Jimbo's blanking was to rewrite the article, not create a perma-stub. &mdash; ''''']]]''''' <sup>]</sup> 00:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
: Also commented on my talk page; I completely agree with Bottesini. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
:: Didn't comment on my talk page, but yeah, me too. I've removed the attacks that 65.184.17.216 posted to this page. ] 13:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:14, 10 November 2024

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconBusiness Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFashion Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew Jersey Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Misplaced Pages feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconWomen writers Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAfrican diaspora Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

In the newsA news item involving Stephanie Adams was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 May 2018.
Misplaced Pages
Misplaced Pages
Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5



This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 8 sections are present.


Fully to Semi

I really think the admin who reduced the protection of this page is asking for more disruption and frivolity. The article was "quiet" for so long only because of the full protection level. This bio is probably being being wiki watched and secretly watched by so many people, it might be best to remain cautious. Just my opinion. Tfortrouble (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Hmmmm, what is this link directly below my post about psychotherapy? It must be a technical error because I did not post it. Can someone please fix it? Cheers Tfortrouble (talk) 23:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The link was a reference. Now fixed (I had it dumped above, where it belonged). -- Hoary (talk) 06:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
There are only seven articles under indefinite full protection and only one (because of an Arbcom case) had that protection set before July 2014. Articles simply shouldn't be indefinitely fully protected and then forgotten. --NeilN 13:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Speaking as the unprotecting admin, I assure you that this article is being watched by more than one administrator to make sure the unprotection doesn't go wrong. Given the article's history, this was never going to be an unprotect-and-run. If anything does go wrong now, renewed protection (or pending changes, or any necessary blocks or topic bans) can be applied as soon as they're needed by any of the admins who are supervising here. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Much appreciation in regards to the responses. Cheers. Tfortrouble (talk) 20:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stephanie Adams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 09:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Stephanie Adams died this morning. Jmlittleton (talk) 16:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. https://nypost.com/2018/05/18/playboy-playmate-took-young-son-on-fatal-leap-from-nyc-building/
I would like to wait on this edit until an official spokesman states what happened. Anonymous sources close to the investigation aren't really BLP-compliant. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Not yet. Further, the sources currently reporting this story are the New York Post and the National Enquirer—hardly the bastions of the journalism industry or models of reliable sources. If the Times runs a story, then I think we can mention something, but right now, I don't think it's in keeping with WP:BLP to add this yet. —C.Fred (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@SarekOfVulcan: ABC news is reporting the story based on "police sources". I think we're getting closer to meeting the RS/V/BLP standards and might be there; do you? —C.Fred (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Dead after a fall, I'd consider verified. Jumped, I wouldn't. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I propose the following text for the personal life section, with no mention in the intro at this time (other than to add the date):
On the evening of May 17, 2018, Adams and her son checked into a 25th-floor penthouse in the Gotham Hotel. The next morning, both were found dead on a second-floor balcony. Law enforcement officials are still investigating but say they apparently jumped.(cite news for this AP story: )
@SarekOfVulcan: Representative and verifiable? —C.Fred (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@C.Fred: First two sentences good - last one not verifiable, imho. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@SarekOfVulcan: Unless ABC and the AP are talking to the same people, we've got multiple media outlets' sources saying the same thing. That's why I attributed and hendged with "apparently". —C.Fred (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@C.Fred: Given the apparent history of domestic violence, I'm very hesitant to say anything. And I'll bet you they are talking to the same people - I'd like to hope there's a minimal number of people willing to blab about an investigation in progress. --17:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Valid point about DV. I've added the two sentences and source to the article, I've added the {{Recent death}} template, and I've placed a comment in the Personal life section suggesting that people don't add a cause or speculative cause at this point and pointing them to this discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Looks good. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
In the serious RS now. I won't be editing this as I used to know her. O3000 (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

murder-suicide

This diff, restores text describing an incident as murder-suicide. Objective3000 then removes this text (twice) with an edit summary saying “Not good sources. Only a trial judge can rule murder as it's a class of crimes. Good sources say the coroner ruled it a homicide, which is not a crime but a cause of death.” AFAIK, People is a reliable source. There are other reliable sources also using “murder-suicide” as well. So that should put this issue of “not good sources” to bed. As far as “only a trial judge can rule murder” goes, that’s an opinion of an editor, and it’s pure hogwash. We use reliable sources at Misplaced Pages, not editor conjecture. I’m restoring the phrase.

The NYPost says “The former Playboy Playmate who killed herself and her 7-year-old son in a murder-suicide leap Friday was distraught because she couldn’t take the kid to Europe for the summer, a close friend told The Post.”. People says The deaths of a former Playboy playmate and her 7-year-old son have been ruled a murder-suicide after the woman jumped with the boy from a New York City hotel on Friday, officials say. Both use the phrase. Both are considered reliable sources.That man from Nantucket (talk) 06:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
And again. A medical examiner's finding is not an "allegation". General Ization 17:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
The medical examiner did not call it a murder-suicide. He called it a homicide. O3000 (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
@That man from Nantucke:, I’ve asked for guidance at Misplaced Pages:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Stephanie_Adams. O3000 (talk) 17:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Why does this feel like the goalposts are moving? AFAIK there is no legal definition of a murder-suicide, but even if there were one it doesn’t matter. In this case we have multiple secondary sources (e.g. People) reporting on what a primary source (“officials”) said. How did those officials make their statement? Was it an email? A phone call? A press conference? Carrier pigeon? It doesn’t matter. We trust People got this correct. They classified the deaths as a murder-suicide.
No moving of goalposts whatsoever. We now have six sources that say the medical examiner said homicide, not murder-suicide. And, People is a celebrity mag, not a news source. O3000 (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
I beg to differ. Your edit summaries Not good sources. Only a trial judge can rule murder as it's a class of crimes. Good sources say the coroner ruled it a homicide, which is not a crime but a cause of deat and Ruled a homicide, not a murder. A coroner cannot rule murderare an attempt to override reliable sources, based upon your opinion of NY law. I think it’s fair to say at this point that you are the only one holding this opinion and it flies in the face of how we use reliable sources. We have multiple sources labeling this a murder-suicide. People is definitely a reliable source, your opinion notwithstanding. So are the other two sources. And while the deaths have been labeled a homicide, murder is also a homicide. It doesn’t matter if a court has yet to weigh in on this because we have multiple reliable sources reporting that NYC officials have ruled this a murder-suicide.That man from Nantucket (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
You have provided ONE source that says the medical examiner called this murder-suicide. I provided SIX that he called it a homicide. And, I am not trying to rewrite NY law. I am repeating the legal definition of homicide in all 50 states as per Findlaw. and the Presumption of innocence. O3000 (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Category: American murderers of children

I added this category and then reverted myself when I saw that it had been challenged before by Objective3000 based on the grounds that "no court has ruled it a murder". Based on this logic should we removed the categories for "American female murderers", "2018 murders in the United States", and "Murder–suicides in the United States"? Greyjoy 06:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Cats are often loosely defined. But, they should probably be removed. O3000 (talk) 11:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
They've been added back since the discussion above. I didn't add them back, but they should be there. The one and only standard English phrase for her action is "murder–suicide", a phrase that would not exist if the criminal law technicalities were the sole standard, since dead people are never found guilty of anything at all in most modern court systems. Saying that she's not a murderer allows not just criminal legal procedure, but even the lack of criminal legal procedure, to override uncontroverted facts to the point that it violates non-neutral point of view. Misplaced Pages has no legal obligation to allow a person to permanently veto recognition and labeling of their own evil by choosing to die before some official sticker can be placed on their heads. --Closeapple (talk) 19:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Only the medical examiner didn't call it a murder-suicide. O3000 (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories: