| Revision as of 07:36, 4 May 2013 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,530 edits →Arbitration enforcement warning: WP:ARBEE: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:37, 8 May 2024 edit undoJ2m5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,084 edits Notification: listing of Michael Darby at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (206 intermediate revisions by 58 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User Troll}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |algo = old(10d) | |algo = old(10d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Miacek/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | |archive = User talk:Miacek/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] 12:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Governorates vs. Duchies== | |||
| Hiya, I noticed you added the coat of arms for the ] to you userpage, so I was wondering what the connection was. I've been doing some reading and a few sources seem to indicate the formal title was actually "Duchy of Estonia", since the Tsars formally held the title ] during that period of Russian rule. The term "Governorate" seems to be more about administrative aspect of that rule, in other words, one could say that the ''Duchy of Estonia'' was administered as a ''governorate'' of the Russian empire. Your thoughts? --] (]) 02:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wrong name and information on Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei on the Misplaced Pages Estonia== | |||
| :Interesting thoughts, I checked a few crosswiki links, but the relevant articles in Russian wiki seem to confirm, that the Duchy of Estonia ceased to exist with the Treaty of Nystad, as the Governorate of Reval , founded in 1719, is said to have succeeded the Duchy. Nevertheless, the official title of the Russian Emperor ''did'' contain '''''Князь Эстляндский''', Лифляндский, Курляндский и Семигальский '' , i.e. Duke of Esthonia, Livonia, Courland and Semigallia (but the title also includes 'Duke of ]' among others). ] ] 08:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Dear Miacek, I write you here because it's too difficult to find the discussion page on the Misplaced Pages of Estonia. I changed on the 22 of May the page that (I think) you created "Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei", because I'm a member of the Party and I wanted to uniform all the information in all the languages. | |||
| ::I found this source ''Russia & Europe in the Nineteenth Century'' by Roy Bolton which states: ''"However, Tallinn retained its local self-government, and its cultural and economical autonomy within Imperial Russia under the Duchy of Estonia."'', also ''Foreword to the past: a cultural history of the Baltic people'' by Endre Bojtár: ''"Its northern part became the Duchy of Estonia, first under Swedish and then, from 1721, Russian rule"''. Then we have references to the ''"Duchy of Estland under the Russian crown"'' and here. --] (]) 10:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Firstly, it is wrong to say Swiss Communist Party, because the name is Communist Party (Switzerland), and also the "Partito Comunista della Svizzera italiana" is wrong because that name can only be found on the facebook page, and relies to italian speaking part of Switzerland, but it is not the official name of the Party. I can give you the right information, if you want to make the article correct. Thank You. | |||
| == 3RR at Party for Freedom == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ]] 16:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.{{Break}}<br/>At least I give an explanation for my reverts. Do you revert according to your moods now?<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Thanks for translation == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 09:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your help with the Estonian translation which allowed the closing of an OTRS ticket. Appreciated ] <sup>]</sup> 11:50, 30 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Lake Peipus == | |||
| Please revisit ] ] (]) 18:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Far-left politics == | |||
| Hello Estlandia, | |||
| there is currently a discussion wether or not to include a list of (arguably) far-left parties in the article. However you decided to revert without referring to the posted comments on the talk page. You might want to join the discussion instead. Kind regards --] (]) 13:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| ] | |||
| For your work related to Estonian topics on English Misplaced Pages. | |||
| ] (]) 00:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both"/> | |||
| :Thanks for that, my cat is over ten years old, he'd like a young friend like that on the pic :D ] ] 09:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I am sending this message to all the editors which I believe have been engaged in reversions on this article. Please discuss and gain consensus before removing/adding the section. —] 09:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ARBCOM Notice == | |||
| You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
| * ]; | |||
| * ]. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] (]) 02:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| <center>''useless copy from 2009''</center> | |||
| Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:db-warn --> ] (]) 10:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Copei == | |||
| Hello Estlandia, | |||
| I have used the article on Copei that was listed in the "further reading" section as a reference. Therefore it is in the references section now, and the further reading section is not needed any longer. Kind regards --] (]) 15:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, I see. The IP troll (permablocked ]) is as a rule nonconstructive in his reverts, so I undid his changes. No use in trying to explain him anything, only can help. Regards,] ] 16:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == HI == | |||
| Have we met? --] (]) 17:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Dispute resolution survey== | |||
| {| style="background-color: #CCFFFF; border: 4px solid #3399cc; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | |||
| | ] | |||
| <big>'''Dispute Resolution – ''Survey Invite'''''</big> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Misplaced Pages, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. | |||
| '''Please click to participate.'''<br> | |||
| Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated ]. <font face="Verdana">] ] <sup>]</sup></font> 00:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| == Highbeam == | |||
| Hi Estlandia, you may be interested in ]. Cheers, ] (]) 18:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for informing me! Cheers, ] ] 08:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Your HighBeam account is ready! == | |||
| Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: | |||
| * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Misplaced Pages email address. | |||
| **Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in ]). | |||
| **If you did not receive a code but were on the ], add your name to ] and we'll try again. | |||
| * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code. | |||
| * To activate your account: 1) Go to ; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive. | |||
| * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to ], or ask ]. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration. | |||
| * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate | |||
| * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at ] | |||
| * Show off your HighBeam access by placing <nowiki>{{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}}</nowiki> on your userpage | |||
| * When the 1-year period is up, check ] to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be. | |||
| Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 20:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0256 --> | |||
| == You are deleting Rankovicism now? It is being used now in other articles == | |||
| On the article ] we have just agreed today to use the term in the infobox. It is used in the article on the ]. It is well-referenced, it clearly describes that Rankovic's politics were popular, it describes the significance of it, and it describes that his agenda continued after his death. Deletion of this article is unacceptable.--] (]) 13:54, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Nonsense. You have zero sources for the claim that SPS was 'Rankovićist'. Pure OR.] ] 13:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::You seem highly aggressive and ] on this. The SPS' founder and first leader Milosevic has been reviewed as having an agenda linked to Rankovic's politics. Look at reference 108 on this page and this reference: . And if you disagree with its use in one article, then why are you deleting the '''''entire article''''' on Rankovicism that is well sourced?--] (]) 13:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::: this source you linked actually juxtaposes Milošević' and Ranković policies. And even if there were similarities (which I don't doubt there were), this does not mean we could classify SPS or League of Communist as 'Rankovićist' - a total neologism with no support in sources. ] ] 14:06, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No it is not a neologism, the term was coined in the SFRY and used as early as the 1960s, the sources in the article demonstrate this. Here is the use of the term in 1969 , here it is used in 1974 , here it is in 1977 here it is in 1985 .--] (]) 14:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Socialist Party of Serbia == | |||
| The addition of Rankovićism is subject to consensus found at the bottom of ]. It was being discussed over a very long period in which time you made no suggestions and no contribution. I recommend that if you oppose the term, you assert your views on the discussion first because at the moment, you are presenting yourself as the antagonist - reverting work that has been in development for weeks. Furthermore, it appears you are not only reverting the term ''Rankovićism'' which may seem more constructive, but you are deleting the full works of the editor and this is regarded as blanking. Not acceptable. The way I see the situation is this, you have already nominated the article for deletion, let's see the outcome of that - if it be deleted per your suggestion, we'll revise every entry containing the term. Until then, can you please leave the sections in accorance with the consensus. Thank you. ] ('''Евлекис''') (]) 17:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Consensus or no consensus (there are just two of you) - you are constantly adding a totally unsourced notion into the infobox.] ] 17:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, you are : this functions is meant solely for simple vandalism. Misusing it has already led to the privilege being withdrawn in the past.] ] 18:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am not going to use it on you again (it's just for simplicity - no offence intended). Misplaced Pages does not work on a "consensus or no consensus, I do what I like" basis. I only suggest we await a result on the deletion request and I promise you, if it be deleted, we will remove the entry everywhere. ] ('''Евлекис''') (]) 18:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ever heard of ] or ]? ] ] 18:06, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Indeed. Both. However, I am convinced that this is not the case here. You have done the correct thing by nominating the page and I am simply awaiting more contributions. I have nothing more to say there but I will respect the outcome and that is a promise, there will be no resistence from me if it goes the other way. ] ('''Евлекис''') (]) 18:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Template:Islamophobia== | |||
| Please explain why you want to exclude ] from ] on the talk page.--] (]) 11:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit war over Eurabia== | |||
| Your resumption of the edit war over ] has been reported at ].--] (]) 19:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| . My account was compromised yesterday as I left the computer while being logged on when my twelve-year-old nephew was nearby. I didn't even notice he tampered with anything, but upon entering today I realized what happened. Sorry. Anyway, I re-reverted your edit and restored my last version. Many thanks and keep safeguarding the site. ] (]) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == You last removal of POV-tag == | |||
| I noticed you just removed the POV tag from the ] article. I don't think this is a correct step, taking into account the POV dispute on the article's talk page. The main arguments of one party are still not answered, and by doing the revert without bringing new arguments and thoughts you just join an edit war, which is unproductive. I recommend you to self-revert. | |||
| Hope to productively collaborate with you in future. | |||
| Best regards.--] (]) 20:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I demur. Igny just got off of a lengthy topic ban from all East Europe articles - and we ought not "enable" this behaviour. Cheers. ] (]) 21:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Miacek, I would strongly recommend you to remove you revert on ]. If you review it history you would notice that you are in direct violation of ] rule as well as (together with Collect and Martin) in violation of ]. Consider this as a warning that such edits are unacceptable on WP, in part per policies which I referred to here. (] (]) 23:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)) | |||
| :He is not in any such "violation" and issuing such a "warning" is contrary to Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. I would urge you to remember you just got off a long topic ban - and jumping right into the topic you were banned from is not especially wise. Cheers. ] (]) 23:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed you did that again. I respectfully request you to self-revert (or not to revert Igny).--] (]) 02:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Please see ].--] (]) 06:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| Hello Estland. I noteced that you along some other users have been edit warring in several biographies in order to remove the historically accurate place of birth and replace it with modern-day country names. | |||
| The point is that you are linking ] as "country of birth", exemple , to a person born in 1982, when in fact Estonia, as clearly stated in the article, only restored its independence in 1991. As much as the occupation may be disputed, the fact is that a person born in ] in 1982 is in fact born in ] in a country called ]. | |||
| I don´t have any ties or relation to Estonia neither to the region, but I am fully aware of the historical events that happend there, and I do support historical accuracy to be used in encyclopedic articles in opposition to any other tendencies, just as the vast majority of editors do. Doing otherwise brings problems of nationalism and recentism into this debate, and we want to avoid those in this and all other matters. | |||
| I also noteced ]´s excuse how the edit is backed by however there is no "special standard" for Estonia, and they should seek a consensus on this, rather than highjacking the articles related to one specific country and doing something which is not standard troughout Misplaced Pages. There was also an explanation provided by ] but also fails to provide a valid reason why the situation should be ignored. The occupation lasted for decades, and the fact is that people were born in the Soviet Union while that occupation took place. Otherwise we would be ignoring an important historical event which was the ], and we don´t want to ignore that fact. The occupation took place, and we should transpond adequately that fact into the articles. | |||
| Hoping you´ll open a discussion and seek consensus instead of ] in group, I send you best regards, ] (]) 07:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :The sources doesn't mention Soviet Union and I have searched for this.They only mention Estonia so per ] we should stick to what sources say.--] (])/] 15:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: @FkpCascais, during the period of the "Estonian SSR" you can have | |||
| ::* Estonia = the country USSR | |||
| :: or you can have | |||
| ::*Estonia the country = occupied by the USSR, | |||
| :: but you can't have both. For example, we don't list persons born in Lyon in 1941 as born in "Vichy France." ]<small> ►]</small> 15:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==KKE== | |||
| Look , and please stop the propaganda. --] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 10:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Please stop edit warring.] ] 10:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You also --] (]) 20:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| I have mentioned you in thread. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']'''.''']'''</small> 15:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for the notice, if I do find time, I might participate.] ] 15:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == AN/I thread Re: ] == | |||
| I started ] to discuss ], as well as related issues, as a neutral party. - ] | <sup>] and ]</sup> 09:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Preußische Stargard etc. == | |||
| I completely agree with your recent revert on Royal Prussia (or as it's more commonly known - Polish Prussia). We do need double naming and I also didn't realize it in the beginning. It's your offensive edit summary, that I find unacceptable. Your namecalling, insults and accusations are absolutely uncalled for. 83.28.23.47 is probably just a new guy, who's only trying to find his way around the Pedia. Maybe he is a little biased, but then again who isn't? (With my luck it's probably you). On a different note: We say "non-NPOV" around here, not "POV". "POV" does not mean anything, don't mindlesly follow other peoples mistakes. ]. Happy editing and good luck with your reverts. Just calm down and chill, OK? ] (]) 05:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC) <br> | |||
| Me again. Just letting you know I left a few words of wisdom on 83.28.23.47's talk page. ] (]) 05:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Credo Reference == | |||
| I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly. | |||
| We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Misplaced Pages editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out ] and ], where accounts ''are'' still available. Cheers, ] 19:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0330 --> | |||
| == Independent Greeks== | |||
| Estlandia, I think that you have made a change in the ] article and you omitted the ] label to the party's ideology. In my opinion, the labels ], ] and ], may create the feeling to a reader, who does not know many things about Greek politics, that this party is xenophobic, something that is false. So, I put the Liberal nationalism label in order to show that within the party there are patriots, who just love Greece, but do not feel superior to other races or nations. Only liberal nationalism makes this clear to the people, as the other types of nationalism are considered more extreme. Unfortunately, I have not found yet any official statement or newspaper article that proves the liberal national ideology of the party. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Your free 1-year ] account is approved ready == | |||
| Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Misplaced Pages email! | |||
| # Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer | |||
| # Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive). | |||
| # Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Misplaced Pages will see it). | |||
| # You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year). | |||
| If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at ''wikiocaasi@yahoo.com'' and, second, email ''QuestiaHelp@cengage.com'' along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Misplaced Pages). | |||
| * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at ]. | |||
| * Questia would love to hear feedback at ] | |||
| * Show off your Questia access by placing <nowiki>{{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}}</nowiki> on your userpage | |||
| * When the 1-year period is up, check the ] to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be. | |||
| Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, ] ] (]) 05:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0358 --> | |||
| == Eurabia == | |||
| You called a peer-reviewed journal article and the ''Financial Times'' "fringe". Would you care to even make an attempt at backing up that laughable assertion? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 17:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Please remember me and continue the effort against far-right trolls == | |||
| I was accused (see my talk page and all pertinent links there) of being a sock puppet, because someone didn't like my anti-nazi efforts on ] and ]. Most likely, I'll be blocked based on completely circumstantial "evidence" (in Misplaced Pages, they don't block because they're certain someone is the culprit, but because they ''assume'', based on half-baked assumptions) and an application of the ] practice. My accuser is, of course, Greek - and in Greece, the far right is rampant and on the loose. Please continue the good work against racists and right-wing extremists, especially w.r.t Greek topics. ] (]) 00:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :That's great, accusing me behind my back even, of being a far-right winger and "on the loose", whatever that means, without any evidence. At least I had evidence when I opened the SPI and I left a message for you to participate. As the person who opened this SPI I had the chance to read all the invective you threw at your opponents, calling them "nazi-trolls", "nazis", far-right-wingers and any combination thereof. Did you see me getting upset when I saw you talking like that about the right-wingers if indeed I identified with these people? Go and read the Greek junta article where I wrote the Human rights section years ago. When you finish reading please let me know if my writings sound like those of a right-winger to you. Better still read one of my favourites: ] and let me know how far to the right it is. It obviously isn't anywhere close. Let me give an example: | |||
| :: | |||
| :{{quotation|As soon as the coup d'état of the 21st of April 1967 was announced over the radio, martial music was continuously broadcast over the airwaves. This was interrupted from time to time with announcements of the junta issuing orders that always started with the introduction ''We decide and we order.'' Normally this kind of introduction is applied inside army barracks when the commander issues the orders of the day that the soldiers are expected to follow. Taking the application of this system into the civilian domain was the junta's method of replacing Parliamentary legislation with a series of military orders broadcast over the airwaves and in the process signal to the Greek people what the new legislative method was. Long standing political freedoms and civil liberties that were taken for granted by the Greek people for decades were instantly suppressed, special military courts were established, and political parties were dissolved, all with simple, uniform, military order type announcements over the radio. Legislation that took decades to fine tune and multiple Parliaments and elections to enact was thus erased in a matter of days. The rapid devolution of Greek ] had begun.}} | |||
| :I wrote this and much more. Why am I telling you all this? Because the reason for this investigation is not political in any sense. If you were anywhere but here on Misplaced Pages I would congratulate you for your stance against the right-wingers. The shadow of the junta may be faint but it is long. We don't need a revival in an even worse version. But here is not the place for fighting; this is an encyclopedia. No name-calling should be used to subdue your opponents, the discourse must be civil as much as possible and no socking is allowed. The discourse within Misplaced Pages must remain professional and civil. That's all. ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 01:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Please stop stalking my edits == | |||
| Hi, recently you've arrived at several articles you've never edited or expressed an interest in before solely to revert my edits. It is painfully clear that you are following my edits around and are trying to provoke confrontations and edit wars. Please stop, as this pattern of behavior constitutes ]. Thank you.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :And how exactly did you find those articles, that you had never edited before, if not by stalking Jason's edits today? , , , - you followed his edits and reverted them en masse.--] ] 18:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'll take that as a pretty direct admission that you WERE in fact stalking my edits. So please stop. | |||
| ::As for how I found the "Persecution of xxx" articles, well, gee, since I was involved at the "Persecution of Muslims" article, I went through and looked up "Persecution of " articles for comparison purposes and put them on my watch list. Dhimmi and dhimmitude were already on my watchlist. So no, I did not look up or stalk Jason's edits. Unlike what you did to me.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:33, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::You seriously believe anyone would buy into your laughable explanation as to your massive reverts of Jason yesterday? You for stalking editors like Russavia in the past, so please stop such activities in the future. ] ] 08:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 7== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 16:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==More on Pilsudski dictatorship in Poland== | |||
| Thank you for your recent edits and reviews of the Misplaced Pages article on ]. | |||
| There is an on-going discussion and edits of this article related to Pilsudski dictatorship. Your contributions to this discussions and edits will be most appreciated. See the talk page of the Pilsudski article: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:J%C3%B3zef_Pi%C5%82sudski#Sources_on_Pilsudski_dictatorship:_Britannica_Concise_Encyclopedia.2C_The_Oxford_Companion_to_Military_History.2C_Gale_Encyclopedia_of_Biography.2C_Columbia_Encyclopedia_and_Time_Magazine <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::Sorry if my words are vandalism or if I hurt you, but it seems to be that many enwiki users forget about how wikipedia maintains its '''neutrality'''. Misplaced Pages keeps its neutrality not by delete selected information because of Soviet this, Soviet that. It preserve that neutrality by accepting and expressing many points of view together. So if you see some articles are too POV, the only good thing to do is add verifiable sources from the other points of view to restore the balance, not by deleting the sources. Deleting like that is not making wikipedia more neutral. It is '''CENSORSHIP'''. To be frankly, I am sick of some users using the agrument "Soviet this, Soviet that" and delete the information, even if the sources are taken from reliable sources such as Russian Archive Agency (Russian, not Soviet). I used to think En.wiki is the most neutral wikipedia version because English users can be the citizens of many different countries, but now I am gradually believing that it is merely a propaganda machine of CIA and the anti-Soviet powers. ] (]) 14:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::English Misplaced Pages is a rather neutral Misplaced Pages, in contrast to, say, the German Wiki, which is heavily biased to the left.] ] 14:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry I was rude and I was impolite to you. But I believe, if the German wiki was biased to the left, the good thing to do is add more info in the “right” point of view to restore the balance, not deleting. ] (]) 14:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Zori Balayan == | |||
| Isa Gambar is an Azeri politician, why should his criticizing Zori Balayan's book be added to the article? He criticizes Zori Balayan' book about the historical events, but he is not a historian. ] (]) 18:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Gambar is a professional historian who at the time (1982—1990) worked at the Institute of Oriental Studies of AzSSR, so I think he qualifies. Secondly, ''Hearth'' was critized by many Azeri intellectuals, whilst it was said to have been hugely popular in Armenia. I think this deserves a mention.] ] 18:32, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::His wiki page states he is a politician and doesnt mention anything about him being a historian. http://en.wikipedia.org/Isa_Gambar it says his wife had a Doctorate in History but nothing about him. Is there a source you can add that shows hes a historian or an Azerbaijani historian that criticized the book? ] (]) 19:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I relied on Russian wiki, where it's mentioned that he graduated as a historian and worked as orientalist (also mentioned here as orientalist: (''востоковеды Абульфаз Эльчибей и Иса Гамбар'')).] ] 19:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thank You ] (]) 22:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring === | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> // ] (]) | |||
| == Civic Platform == | |||
| Hello Estlandia, | |||
| you know that ] is a core policy of Misplaced Pages. You know that Misplaced Pages does not publish theories that have not yet been published in reliable sources. If you find an article that deals with the interesting theory that Civic Platform is stronger in the parts of Poland that belonged to Prussia before 1918, and Law and Justice in the ones that belonged to Austria and Russia, I will be very interested. But without it, it is just an unsourced (although not incomprehensible or outright false) theory, that may be published on a blog or in a forum, but not here. Kind regards. --] (]) 21:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 27== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == re Nagorno Karabakh == | |||
| I mass-reverted someone who added the same screed to multiple pages. It had no purpose being on the others, he doesn't get to play shotgun and hope it sticks. It also contained at least one factual error. I see no reason to coddle this user. --] (]) 15:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I see no reason not to fix the alleged error and revert the whole thing. It was a sourced para.--] ] 15:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Being sourced does not make it relevant for the article. Was it relevant in the other half dozen places the exact same thing was pasted? No. But since you've insisted, I'll elaborate: 1) It introduces Khojaly as if this were the article on it, when it's handled further down in the existing prose. 2) It says it was in the NKAO. 3) It says this happened in 2012 (I know they mean 1992 but still). 4) It gives the details of the massacre when before it was part of the narrative of the war, as if the massacre was separate from it. 5) It then gives the existing text as "Background of the genocide"; really? Not expressing a certain POV here, are we? 6) So far as I can tell, despite supplying a dozen references for a single paragraph, not one is in the English language. Why is that? 7) It repeats information given lower in the article specifically because the editor didn't care what was in the article, because he pasted this same exact paragraph to a half dozen articles. 8) It simply was unnecessary, hyperbolic, and added nothing to the articles it was placed in. That's eight reasons. --] (]) 16:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Social Democratic Party== | |||
| I know centre-left isn't an idelogy, so that's why I removed it afterwards. By the way, learn some manners. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Stop making the same meaningless edits again and again. Not sure why 'centrism' was removed too, given the abundance of sourced in intro.] ] 16:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm sorry, I didn't mean to cause such a mess. I was only trying to clear it up. Well hopefully I can continue making contributions elsewhere without being moaned at. I understand that my edits were meaningless, but initially I thought they were beneficial. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::OK, just be more careful in the future and do not edit war.--] ] 16:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah sorry about the edit war. I wasn't actually aware of it because I wasn't sure whether I had changed the link back or whether someone else had, but what the heck, it's fixed now :) Yeah, I'll be more careful in the future :) | |||
| == The Communist Party of Greece == | |||
| The Communist Party of Greece has too an Eurocommunist ideology --Danrolo 23:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Danrolo/IP 190... == | |||
| Hello Estlandia, | |||
| ] . However, he often edits with changing IPs. The administrator, ] asks us to inform him if Danrolo returns with a new IP. Kind regards. --] (]) 19:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism == | |||
| I see you are stalking my edits, thank you. Reverting addition of a porn star to a serious article is fighting a vandalism. If you have a problem with that, go ahead and report me. - ] (]) 19:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :First, this addition was NOT simple vandalism and I will report you if you do it again. Second, I'm not stalking anyone, i have the article in my watchlist since I first edited it in 2010. . --] ] 20:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::It was a simple vandalism, and you can report me even now if you think otherwise. Cheers. - ] (]) 21:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Stalking again? == | |||
| . Seriously, stop it. You've never edited that article before.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 20:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :And I'm no longer allowed to edit articles I've 'never edited before', if you have recently edited the article concerned? It shouldn't really surprise you that I'm interested in Slavic and Germanic languages. Don't disseminate accusations of stalking so carelessly. --] ] 10:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not if it's a repeated long term pattern, no. That's stalking.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 16:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Editing general topics like Slavic languages after you happened to edit it is not stalking you, esp. if you consider that I've created numerous articles related to Slavic peoples before. Stop making things up. ] ] 17:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Repeatedly showing up soon after I edit an article, especially in cases where I'm having a disagreement with someone, *is* stalking. Look, if this was a one-off occurrence that'd be one thing. But I've had to warn you about this kind of behavior several times in the past. In one instance you didn't even bother to deny that you were stalking my edits.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 18:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yes, there are instances when I don't even bother to argue with you. If you feel being stalked and harassed, you might take the issue to a relevant noticeboard, though my gut feeling is that another Arbcom case is not far away anyway. ] ] 18:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::You've been saying that for something like three years. Seriously, I really don't want to have to go and dig out all the diffs, I would much rather you simply stopped doing it. There's plenty of articles on Misplaced Pages and there's no reason why you have to follow me around.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 18:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Yeah, digging out old diffs - that's what your group :) ] ] 19:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::I don't have a "group" and I wasn't even a part of that ArbCom case, so, no, try again. In the mean time quit following me around. Also, if you have some kind of problem with Piotrus or you intend to file an ArbCom case against him, you should probably let *him* know. Strange.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 19:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Baltic blowups == | |||
| My apologies Estlandia. It's just frustrating when you've got editors supporting revisionism. ] (]) 13:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :No revisionism here, just some editors suffering from amnesia. --] (]) 19:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::BTW Estlandia, say hello to my ]. PS: Atleast he agrees that he's suffering from amnesia. -- ] (]) 20:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I know Nug since 2008, no surprise that he has my talk page in his watchlist.] ] 20:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Nug already beat you to it (ie. linking to my Czech revert) & like I explained to him, I let the undoing of that revert stand. ] (]) 14:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring at Erika Steinbach == | |||
| <span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 19:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Karabakh War == | |||
| Here is the link, http://www.eurasianet.org/node/66664, i probably set it up incorrectly. ] (]) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Received Your mail == | |||
| Hello ! I received Your e-mail, but ''something in my Outlook Express stops me from making a reply''. So I reply to You here instead. And a large ''Thanks'', by the way. However I've got no knowledge of the subject You wanted me to have a look at though. (But I've been interested in the "in between the wars-period" for a long time. WWI and II aswell.) In general I agree that ''some'' Polish users seems aggresive towards non-Polish users, and they sometimes deliberate or not (?), uses dubios and/or biosed sources. And quite a few Polish-related articles are sadly affected by "tipping" in a certain direction, disreguarding all NPOV Wikipedian rules. Or by removal of some parts and adding others - often with no obvious reason. (Example the city of Wroclaw/Breslau was in the middle of the 13:th century destroyed by the Mongols, three of each other indepening, Swedish encyklopedias states, but was removed without reason, even though thecity was not under Kingdom of Poland during this event. I'm just sad for the readers, and the credibility of English Misplaced Pages in the long run) I do though hope that Marek is about to improve himself as editor. He actually is reasonable, but very suspicious towards non-Polish editors, I guess. But on the other hand, circumstances like an anonymous user (after starting his argumentation rather well) accuses Polish people of being car thiefs '''is not helpful''' eighter. Cheers ] (]) 22:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Lol. Wheren't you just complaining about supposed (as opposed to apparantly, real) canvassing? <span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 01:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::1.User Estlandia wanted me to take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=National_Democracy&diff=543134565&oldid=543078941 , and like I here stated, I'm not up to date with this issue at all. But there was no harm in mailing me this. | |||
| 2.'''In general (to all users)''' I would just like to point out that in writing , in my own experience atleast, small matters suddenly may very fast blow up to troublesome argumentation. Please concider that Misplaced Pages is ment to be an encyklopedia for '''readers'''. No need for hard words. ] (]) 23:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring on WP:AN == | |||
| Please stop that. That is not ok, and it's particularly not OK on the Administrators' Noticeboard. ] (]) 21:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :What is not OK? Censorship on the noticeboard or reverts thereof?] ] 21:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::All three of you, actually. The material should (as Marek noted) have been linked rather than cut-paste, even if it was collapse boxed. That sort of text dump from elsewhere is ... not good. Marek should have asked for it to be linked or done a removal-and-link rather than just removal. Your revert back to the original condition (twice) was not constructive. | |||
| ::Unless you disagree that the proper format is to link it, what you should have done was remove and link. So should Marek, for that matter. I asked Skapperod to do it, as he put it there first. But you and Marek should stop fighting over it. | |||
| ::] (]) 21:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| English Misplaced Pages, is getting nuttier with each passing month. ] (]) 12:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| You've reverted me at ] & I got reverted at ]. You may aswell complete the hat-trick & revert me at ]. -- ] (]) 14:38, 15 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for April 20== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:53, 20 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ???? == | |||
| . If it wasn't an edit summary I'd ask you to self revert and strike but ... <span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 17:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :First, why do you keep posting here, if you erase all my posts or comments from your own talk? Second, as to the edit comment, even the most patient person will react if endlessly provoked. You know just as well as anybody else that your constant accusations of me 'stalking' you are pure rubbish in the light of how you're actually behaving at the same time. Recent examples: . Happy stalking!--] ] 17:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Normally I wouldn't post here, but that es was just beyond the pale.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 17:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification == | |||
| <span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 19:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Centre Party and "Personalism" == | |||
| Hi! You reverted my edit removing "]" from the Centre Party's ideology. If you look at the article ], you'll see that this is an ethical/metaphysical philosophy, not a political ideology. I believe the term you mean is something like "personality cult". Now, as you'll no doubt agree, this would not be NPOV in any way. If you can find sources saying that the party has a personality cult or something similar, by all means add them into the main text (as opinions, of course), but I'll have to remove "Personalism" from the infobox right now. ] (]) 05:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 2== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement warning: ] == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| | Ambox warning pn.svg | |||
| | icon size = 40px | |||
| }} | |||
| Please refer to for details. Notably, you must not make ] on others under any circumstances. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 07:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:37, 8 May 2024
Nomination of Populist Party (France) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Populist Party (France) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Populist Party (France) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 12:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrong name and information on Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei on the Misplaced Pages Estonia
Dear Miacek, I write you here because it's too difficult to find the discussion page on the Misplaced Pages of Estonia. I changed on the 22 of May the page that (I think) you created "Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei", because I'm a member of the Party and I wanted to uniform all the information in all the languages.
Firstly, it is wrong to say Swiss Communist Party, because the name is Communist Party (Switzerland), and also the "Partito Comunista della Svizzera italiana" is wrong because that name can only be found on the facebook page, and relies to italian speaking part of Switzerland, but it is not the official name of the Party. I can give you the right information, if you want to make the article correct. Thank You.
Nomination of Die Achse des Guten for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Die Achse des Guten is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Die Achse des Guten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Masum Reza 16:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Darby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Darby is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Darby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.