Misplaced Pages

Talk:Beats Electronics: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:36, 13 May 2013 editWikipelli (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers128,317 editsm Reverted edits by SeniorPoopsNever (talk) to last revision by Mean as custard (HG)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:00, 5 March 2024 edit undo37.111.155.194 (talk) →Evaluation: ReplyTag: Reply 
(27 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
Too Much Colloquialism
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=Low}}
Consider re-editing.
{{WikiProject Brands|importance=Mid}}
:Sure. Consider signing your posts and creating an account. ] (]) 21:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
{{WikiProject California|importance=Low|la=Yes|la-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Professional sound production|importance=Low}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Beats Electronics/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}


== Evaluation ==
== Listing instances in music videos, movies, etc ==


The article “Beats Electronics” is written exceptionally well. I feel as though those who have contributed to the creation of this article have successfully created an effective lead section, incorporated only the relevant and key information, all meanwhile maintaining a neutral tone throughout the entirety of the article. My one and only complaint would be that I found it a bit difficult to follow the large number of key dates, such as investments and subsidiaries. I would suggest to possibly include a timeline to not only further facilitate the understanding of events in chronological order, but to also offer a quick overview of events that readers can quickly scan over. Great job! —-] (]) 05:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
A few instances being mentioned within the article are one thing, but the endless listing of every single instance is making the article look like a promotional advertisement, in conflict with ]. It is un-necessary to clutter up a reference article with such instance citations. At worst - a linked, standalone list (]) would be more appropriate and effective. ] (]) 21:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


:It is done. Appearances of the product now go in ]. Keep the main article free of such advertising and promotion and restore its encyclopedic value. ] (]) 02:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC) :I have no any documents is confidential .I try to improve myself and make small business but high quality people and Clover Hill wont to distract myself ] (]) 22:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

== Manufacturer? ==

Who manufactures the headphones? I’m wondering whether it’s a good manufacturer like Sennheiser, Dr. Dre’s own company, or what. If this information is available somewhere it should be included in the article. —&nbsp;<em>]</em><sup>(]|])</sup>, 02:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
:It's been in the article since day 1, Monster. Please remember that the talk pages are not a discussion forum. ] (]) 19:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

== technology ==

What are they doing technologically to differentiate their product? ] (]) 06:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
:Try entering into the multiple discussions on http://www.avsforum.com/. WP is not the place to discuss such material. ] ] (]) 13:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

so there isn't any real technology behind the product? just mere marketing? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

From HP's marketing, their Beats Audio equipped products have some technical (hardware) innovations, though it is unknown if these actually improve the audio. It is also unknown whether these innovations are part of the Beat Audio spec, or if they are HP's own addition to the their implementation of that spec. I haven't been able to find any actual 'spec' for Beats Audio, by the way, so I'm using this term rather presumptuously (it's possible that there isn't one and it's just marketing/business fluff). Notable hardware innovations from HP's Beats Audio page:
"Features:
-
Redesigned headphone jack to reduce
ground noise
-
Discrete amplifier for more power
-
Dedicated audio island to minimize fan
noise interference."<ref>http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/holiday-beats/all-products.html?jumpid=ex_r602_beatsbydre_may2012_beatsaudio</ref>

] (]) 18:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

== Launch Date ==
The launch date on here is listed as 2008, although a pair can be seen in the music video for "You Don't Know" By Eminem et al, which dates to 2006. Although I have no definite conformation that they are Beats, they look identical, down to the logo on the side. This might be worth researching, seeing as they were evidently in some level of production around 2 years before the Misplaced Pages article credits them as being.
] (]) 20:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
:If we can cite it from a ], then let's change it. Just remember ] ] (]) 21:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

::The first ever Beats by Dr. Dre headphones were announced and released to the public in 2008. The pair shown in 2006 would have most likely been an early prototype if the information about the video it appears in is correct. Due to Eminem's very close affiliation with Dr. Dre, he most likely had early access to a pair if that was the case.
:::As I stated above - ] from ]. WP is not the place for ]. No sense in even bringing it up in discussion if there is not a source. ] (]) 01:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

== Dr. Dre not involved anymore? ==

I heard a rumour that Dr. Dre has quit his involvement with the company.
Can anyone confirm via press release, etc? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 22:00, 5 March 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconApple Inc. Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBrands Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCalifornia: Los Angeles Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconCompanies Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconProfessional sound production Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Evaluation

The article “Beats Electronics” is written exceptionally well. I feel as though those who have contributed to the creation of this article have successfully created an effective lead section, incorporated only the relevant and key information, all meanwhile maintaining a neutral tone throughout the entirety of the article. My one and only complaint would be that I found it a bit difficult to follow the large number of key dates, such as investments and subsidiaries. I would suggest to possibly include a timeline to not only further facilitate the understanding of events in chronological order, but to also offer a quick overview of events that readers can quickly scan over. Great job! —-Kassandras1029 (talk) 05:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I have no any documents is confidential .I try to improve myself and make small business but high quality people and Clover Hill wont to distract myself 37.111.155.194 (talk) 22:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories: