| Revision as of 16:43, 20 May 2013 editAoidh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators58,109 edits →Edit war?: Not only are you wrong, you are also now engaging in personal attacks. Stop.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:04, 9 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,379 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Aoidh/Archives/2024) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader={{talk archive navigation}} |minthreadsleft=2 |minthreadstoarchive=1 |algo=old(14d) |archive=User talk:Aoidh/Archives/%(year)d}}{{User:Aoidh/Templates/Usertalktop}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 2 | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:SudoGhost/Archives/%(year)d | |||
| }} | |||
| <!---{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=User talk:SudoGhost/Archives |mask=User talk:SudoGhost/Archives/2011 |mask=User talk:SudoGhost/Archives/2012 |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=no }}---> | |||
| {{User:SudoGhost/Templates/Usertalktop}} | |||
| {{archive box|image=]|index=/Archives|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot III|age=14| | |||
| <center>]{{•w}}]{{•w}}]</center> | |||
| }} | |||
| <!--- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE. THANK YOU. ---> | <!--- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE. THANK YOU. ---> | ||
| == |
== Block evasion == | ||
| We are still having a problem with ] editing/edit waring their favorite page.... using multiple IPS day after day . | |||
| I did not remove anything on the ] page. I added alot of stuff and changed some minor stuff (such as changing the "Anthologies" header to "Anthologies and special editions". ] (]) 14:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :You may not have meant to, but removed most of the article. - ]] 14:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah, excuse me. I see that now. Misplaced Pages was being glitchy, not appearing correctly. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::Ah, sorry. That does seem to happen sometimes. - ]] 05:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| We are fully aware that . And all the rest of the IP's are from Vancouver British Columbia using Rogers communications. Wondering if the best thing to do is to simply lock up ] this page too IP's overdoing investigations for every IP that keeps popping up. <span style="display:inline-flex;rotate:-15deg;color:darkblue">''']'''</span><span style="display:inline-flex;rotate:15deg;color:darkblue">]</span> 04:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| :I have semi-protected the page and ]. - ] (]) 15:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you! —] (]) 18:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] ] ] without further Consensus == | |||
| Thank you for the kind welcome. I enjoyed the cookies! Regards, ] (]) 01:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem, if you have any questions or anything feel free to ask and I'll be glad to help. :) - ]] 01:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| "I've been facing difficulties with ] on Misplaced Pages. They have a habit of removing well-sourced content from articles, particularly ] and ], without seeking consensus from the community. When I revert their edits, they often respond by tagging my account with ] ] multiple times. I'm concerned that this behavior is disruptive to the collaborative editing process and would like to find a way to resolve this issue." ] (]) 12:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Semi-Protection of ] == | |||
| :@] How lovely to have ] and ] to start 2025. On '']'', ] that removed "{{tq|Material that fails verification be removed}}" per ] with "{{tq|WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH}}" in the edit summary however so lovely we have ] that apparently by following VERIFY, OR, SYNTH was ASPERSIONS as "{{tq|WP:BITE WP:FAITH}}"??? On the same article, the inline citation 48 nor 49 doesn't explicity stated that it's awarded for ''Lovely Runner'' either, further evidencing that my edit was aligned with Misplaced Pages's policies. On ], believed to be related to ] which our dear editor couldn't give me any acceptable neutral explanation to restore their preferred layout and also likely related to ] reverting their incorrect updates to the Infobox's count by going against the ]. In addition, rather perplexing that it was such a thing to discuss first for non-controversial edits when the edits made were per ] and didn't requires ]. Lastly, where exactly was the ASPERSIONSly the ] violations and/or "edit warring" violation on either articles??? '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> 🎉🎆 ] 🎆🎉 <span style="color:#f535aa">(] • ])</span>''' 13:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for requesting the page for semi-protection, I was fighting that vandalism on my own until you came. They are actually talking about me on that site! Cheers] (]) 00:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm afraid I've been busy the past day and will continue to be for the next few days, {{Reply to|Puchicatos}} Without commenting on the merits of anything as I haven't looked deeply into any of this, I would suggest speaking with ] directly, and if you two are unable to resolve the issue, ] may be warranted. I would recommend a venue like ] as a last resort if this is a conduct (rather than a content) issue that cannot be resolved by discussing it with the editor. - ] (]) 03:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm focused on resolving a content issue regarding the "Lovely Runner" article. There's an ongoing discussion at ], and I'd appreciate it if you could take a look when you have a moment. ] (]) 08:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello SudoGhost == | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Puchicatos}} I apologize but the time that I have to dedicate to Misplaced Pages is currently occupied with another matter, but it looks like other editors have also weighed in at ]. ] is available if needed. - ] (]) 17:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| https://maps.google.com/maps?q=pendergrass+georgia&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x88f5e4a98edb1e43:0x4f227446f61d28bd,Pendergrass,+GA&gl=us&ei=MZ-WUarnL42m9gTByYGoBg&ved=0CJUBELYD | |||
| Here is ]'s city limits as up to date with Google, a very reliable source. | |||
| https://maps.google.com/maps?q=jefferson,+georgia&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x88f5e27abe34f7d3:0xe5cb9f2234e18b1b,Jefferson,+GA&gl=us&ei=ep-WUcLJGYSm9gTf74HAAw&ved=0CLwBELYD | |||
| Here is ]'s city limits. Clearly the company is headquartered in Jefferson, Georgia, not Pendergrass. Zip Codes are not city limits and will never be a reliable source for city limit distinguishing. Many cities, a ton of cities have zip code issues and some cities don't even have a zip code at all, only proving that Zip Codes are not used for city limit distinguishing and only for the purpose of mail distribution as said in the ] and ] articles. | |||
| ] (]) 21:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Greenguy2942 | |||
| :Do you have a reliable source that says the company is not in Jefferson? There are sources that say it is, and I don't see any contesting that fact. Misplaced Pages follows what reliable sources say, not ], especially when your conclusion doesn't reflect the sources. - ]] 21:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :...also what is "" supposed to mean? Why would that be relevant in any way, and what point did you have in making that comment? - ]] 01:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 16:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit war?== | |||
| Making a single edit is not edit-warring. Please get your facts straight and do not make baseless allegations against other editors. That's harassment.--] (]) 16:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Indeed, ''you'' have made two reversions within a 24-hour period, so if anyone is edit-warring, it is you. --] (]) 16:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Editors have been blocked for making a single edit before, so you are incorrect and I would advise you to read ] again. Accusing me of "harassment" is a personal attack, do not do it again. - ]] 16:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:04, 9 January 2025
| This is Aoidh's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Talk page archives (Auto-archiving period: 14 days  )
2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024 |
Block evasion
We are still having a problem with User:C.monarchist28 editing/edit waring their favorite page.... using multiple IPS day after day as seen here.
We are fully aware that this IP is them. And all the rest of the IP's are from Vancouver British Columbia using Rogers communications. Wondering if the best thing to do is to simply lock up Canadian ethnicity this page too IP's overdoing investigations for every IP that keeps popping up. Moxy🍁 04:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have semi-protected the page and reverted their other edits. - Aoidh (talk) 15:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
WP:BITE Edit warring a particular editor without further Consensus
"I've been facing difficulties with a particular editor on Misplaced Pages. They have a habit of removing well-sourced content from articles, particularly Lovely Runner and Byeon Woo-seok, without seeking consensus from the community. When I revert their edits, they often respond by tagging my account with Ultraviolet Rollback multiple times. I'm concerned that this behavior is disruptive to the collaborative editing process and would like to find a way to resolve this issue." Puchicatos (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Aoidh How lovely to have WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:PERSONALATTACKS to start 2025. On Lovely Runner, my edit that removed "
Material that fails verification be removed
" per WP:VERIFY with "WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH
" in the edit summary however so lovely we have this edit by our dear editor that apparently by following VERIFY, OR, SYNTH was ASPERSIONS as "WP:BITE WP:FAITH
"??? On the same article, the inline citation 48 nor 49 doesn't explicity stated that it's awarded for Lovely Runner either, further evidencing that my edit was aligned with Misplaced Pages's policies. On List of awards and nominations received by Byeon Woo-seok, believed to be related to this discussion which our dear editor couldn't give me any acceptable neutral explanation to restore their preferred layout and also likely related to this edit reverting their incorrect updates to the Infobox's count by going against the documentation. In addition, rather perplexing that it was such a thing to discuss first for non-controversial edits when the edits made were per WP:BOLD and didn't requires WP:CONSENSUS. Lastly, where exactly was the ASPERSIONSly the WP:3RR violations and/or "edit warring" violation on either articles??? — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 13:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC) - I'm afraid I've been busy the past day and will continue to be for the next few days, @Puchicatos: Without commenting on the merits of anything as I haven't looked deeply into any of this, I would suggest speaking with User:Paper9oll directly, and if you two are unable to resolve the issue, dispute resolution may be warranted. I would recommend a venue like WP:ANI as a last resort if this is a conduct (rather than a content) issue that cannot be resolved by discussing it with the editor. - Aoidh (talk) 03:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm focused on resolving a content issue regarding the "Lovely Runner" article. There's an ongoing discussion at Talk Page: Lovely Runner, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a look when you have a moment. Puchicatos (talk) 08:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Puchicatos: I apologize but the time that I have to dedicate to Misplaced Pages is currently occupied with another matter, but it looks like other editors have also weighed in at Talk:Lovely Runner#Proposed restoration of Lovely Runner awards data. Dispute resolution is available if needed. - Aoidh (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm focused on resolving a content issue regarding the "Lovely Runner" article. There's an ongoing discussion at Talk Page: Lovely Runner, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a look when you have a moment. Puchicatos (talk) 08:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)