| Revision as of 07:44, 21 May 2013 editShadowjams (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers81,353 edits →WP:MOSBOLD: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:01, 7 January 2024 edit undoSDZeroBot (talk | contribs)Bots705,699 edits Nomination of Binders full of women for deletion at AfD | ||
| (80 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
| All discussions prior to |
All discussions prior to July 2013 ]. | ||
| ==Edit blanking== | |||
| Hey, sorry about blanking out your comment- I'm a little new to making edits, I've made a few in the past but clearly I'm still learning. :-/ ] (]) 04:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't worry about it. :) I ] as noted in my edit summary. We were all new at editing at one point; like I said on that article's talk page, be bold! Edit things, and don't worry too much about messing up; someone else can always correct any mistakes, and my view is that it's better to fix things that you think are broken than to hesitate and let errors stand. Let me know if you have any other questions...I'm not a particularly "experienced" editor myself, but I've certainly run into similar pitfalls with screwy accidental edits and the like! – ] (] | ]) 04:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion on ] == | |||
| ==Completing the Move== | |||
| I am contacting you to let you know that there is currently a discussion going on that you might be interested in on ]. I noticed that you were one of the top contributors to the article, so I figured I would let you know. Please don't feel like this invitation means that you have to participate, but feel free to do so if you desire. ] (]) 23:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| How do we get the Kidnapping page moved exactly? ] (]) 16:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :This discussion was recently closed by me, but has since reopened. Please feel free to participate if you are interested. ]] 17:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :It has to be moved by an admin. Hopefully, some admin will determine we have consensus sooner rather than later...but we may need to wait the full 7 days (until the 15th) for the proposal to run its course before a consensus decision is made. (And even then, it might be the case that the reviewer thinks there's no consensus, and we get stuck with the horrible title even longer. But hopefully not.) – ] (] | ]) 17:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ugg, maybe we can get an Admin to look at it.Have you seen this? <ref>http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/10/ariel-castro-cleveland-abduction-cold-blood-kidnap/2149831/</ref> {{unsigned|Legacypac}} | |||
| :::I imagine there are plenty of admins watching the page; there's really no way to get it brought up for a speedy review. Chances are, folks have decided it's too contentious to close quickly and to let it run the full 7 days. (Also, as others have asked, please try to format your comments properly...when you reply, you should generally use an extra ":" to indent one block further than the comment you're replying to, and remember to use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to sign things. Read ] if you haven't. Preview before you submit and you can see if it looks right.) – ] (] | ]) 17:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles == | |||
| ==Re-listed thread== | |||
| Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I re-listed a thread where you had commented and I did hope to hear ]. Thanks. ] (]) 04:22, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for looking for input on this rather than just removing it. :) – ] (] | ]) 04:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I have started a discussion that may interest you at ]. ] (]) 08:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| I know we've had our disagreements on the Boston Marathon bombings article, but your recent edits regarding this guideline are borderline trolling. and are beyond the pale... don't undo those again. Your interpretation of that guideline is untenable. Don't undo obvious convention on any articles before this has wider discussion. ] (]) 07:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
Latest revision as of 01:01, 7 January 2024
All discussions prior to July 2013 have been archived.
Discussion on Talk:Hurricane Sandy
I am contacting you to let you know that there is currently a discussion going on that you might be interested in on Talk:Hurricane Sandy. I noticed that you were one of the top contributors to the article, so I figured I would let you know. Please don't feel like this invitation means that you have to participate, but feel free to do so if you desire. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- This discussion was recently closed by me, but has since reopened. Please feel free to participate if you are interested. I, JethroBT 17:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles
I have started a discussion that may interest you at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles. Anomalocaris (talk) 08:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Binders full of women for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Binders full of women, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Binders full of women (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)