Revision as of 06:26, 26 May 2013 editEarwigBot (talk | contribs)Bots405,053 edits (Bot; Task 19): Notifying user regarding dispute resolution noticeboard case.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:40, 24 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,670,030 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
(556 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Not around|left Misplaced Pages|{{BASEPAGENAME}}|December 1, 2018}} | |||
{{YesAutosign}} | {{YesAutosign}} | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 70K | |maxarchivesize = 70K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 7 | ||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 10 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(5d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Boson/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Boson/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Sandra Navidi page == | |||
== Category:Pan-European advocacy groups == | |||
Dear Boson: Creation of this article was my assignment as a college project, which required that the subject be a notable figure. Sandra Navidi is a public figure in the global economic and financial communities. I had noticed her first on Wall Street Warriors and researched her further. Wall Street Warriors was a TV documentary that profiled her professional and personal life as a woman on Wall Street. It was broadcast in over 25 countries and ranked # 1 most downloaded documentary on iTunes for two consecutive months and thereafter maintained top rated for several more months. Since then she's been scrutinized by various international media outlets and from different angles over several years. The biographical and factual statements have been corroborated by multiple reliable sources that are not paid for by or affiliated with the subject. This Misplaced Pages article has accumulated over 6700 views in the last 90 days, which seems to be indicative of significant public interest. She is googled so much that when you enter just the letters sandra n in the search box, her name is the top hit. She has achieved significant accomplishments in her own right, and through her contributions has influenced the work of people like Nouriel Roubini, (who stands among the world's best known & most respected economists) and business leader legends like George Soros. The profiles in the article’s external links were all independently researched and written by the respective journalists. Ms Navidi has been retained by many reputable companies and universities for public speaking engagements all over the world. Since 2009 she has given over 400 interviews as a financial expert on international media outlets; for example Bertelsmann, Springer, Burda, n-tv, RTL, CNBC, CCTV, Phoenix TV, Huffington Post, AOL, France 24 and over 200 business websites. I made recent changes to the article to provide the information that you & your editorial team felt was necessary, and removed information that you felt did not belong (including superfluous references and peacock terms). The acknowledgement given to Ms. Navidi in Dr. Roubini's book may seem trivial, but is actually quite significant due to his position as one of the world's top economists. It is my belief that this individual meets all of the notability requirements for a Misplaced Pages article and that a remaining room for subjective discretion doesn’t negate that. ] (]) 19:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
:I appreciate your comments posted at the deletion discussion page. Over the last week I've re-read the article (trying to think like a Misplaced Pages editor) and removed elements that had a promotional feel to them. I attempted to tone it down and stick to the facts. Another editor gave suggestions on several references that were not suitable, and I removed all of those this afternoon. If you advise your thoughts on what other elements you feel are promotional or are not worded properly, I would be happy to make additional adjustments. ] (]) 01:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Please see ], where ] has been nominated for renaming. – ] ] 22:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Disambiguation link notification for April 13 == | |||
: This thread should be archived. --] (]) 09:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
== 2019 == | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 32em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 ); border-radius: 1em; border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 14:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
| title = | |||
| image = Bachsaal Schloss Koethen.jpg | |||
| image_upright = 0.75 | |||
| bold = | |||
| normal = | |||
}} | |||
<div class="center"> | |||
<br />'''Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht''' | |||
] - | |||
== Thank you == | |||
]<br /><br /> | |||
{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;" | |||
</div></div> | |||
|- | |||
Thank you for your project help last year! --] (]) 16:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | {{#ifeq:{{{3}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
Please check out "Happy" once more, for ], and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. I wanted that for 1 January, but then wasn't sad about having our music pictured instead. Not too late for resolutions, New Year or not. DYK that he probably kept me on Misplaced Pages, back in 2012? By the line (which brought him to my attention, and earned the first precious in br'erly style) that I added to my editnotice, in fond memory? --] (]) 13:08, 12 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | '''The {{GENDER:{{PAGENAME}}|Working Man's|Working Woman's|Working Wikipedian's}} Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For showing that you are one of a small number of editors willing to take on truly difficult tasks ] ] 20:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Requested move: Chairman → Chair (officer) == | |||
Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past: | |||
|} | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019 | |||
== Party finance in Germany == | |||
Any input would be appreciated. ] (]) 03:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Hi, can anyone please explain to me why this article has a C-class rating? I have improved it months ago and there was no change in the rating. As I am quite interested in the topic I would rather get some help on how to improve it. Thank you! ] (]) 05:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
:] currently does not assess at higher than class B, since we have no formal class A assessment process in place. | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
:I have taken a look at the assessment and checked the class-B criteria. | |||
| title = Precious | |||
:As you will see, I have left "grammar and style" and "supporting materials" unchecked for the time being. | |||
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg | |||
:* "Grammar and style": There are a couple of typos/spelling mistakes that need fixing. Otherwise, I think the style meets B-class criteria, though it could be improved. | |||
| image_upright = 0.45 | |||
:* "Supporting materials": I think the article might benefit from some graphic elements to break up the text a bit and illustrate the figures. | |||
| bold = ] | |||
:As regards further improvements (not ''necessarily'' required for B class): | |||
}} | |||
:* I think the introduction could be improved to provide a better summary of the article (see ]). | |||
--] (]) 06:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
:* I'm not sure that the bulleted list is appropriate in the introduction (see ]). | |||
:* Though I think the references are adequate for B class, there are some evaluative statements that could do with better attribution. Some evaluations seem to be presented as fact, and I'm not sure that is always appropriate. | |||
:--] (]) 13:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
... six years - miss you! --] (]) 08:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Dear Boson, | |||
{{-}} | |||
thank you for providing such detailed information. As for "Grammar and style" I will try to deal with the typos, however, beside that I feel unable to do much because my native language is German and my English may not suffice to provide more improvements. As for "supporting materials" data and graphs are available, but unfortunately I am unable to do the uploads etc. As for the "introduction" I will give it a try maybe next week (that would include the bulleted list). As for "evaluative statements" I'll check it out. As you may see from the above conversation regarding "NPOV" this may be just a matter of wording. Are unexpected/ surprising facts evaluative? ] (]) 06:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
:I have had a "constructive look" and fixed the typos that I found; so that should remove the resulting grammar problems. I also changed a few things to make the article more in line with (my understanding of) ]. When I have a moment, I will try a bit more copy-editing. The English is good but, as a native speaker, I might be able to improve the style a bit. As regards the graphics, I am no expert, so I can't help much, but if you have some figures that you could put on the talk page, I might be able to construct a bar chart; there is also a graphics expert I know from ] who might be able to help with some graphics, if you know what you would like (e.g. pie charts). As regards "evaluative statements", I was thinking of things like | |||
:* ". . . stipulations of the German Basic Law have been far ahead of other constitutions in modern democracies:" This comparison with other states appears to be unsourced. | |||
Although that's a plain fact, I can't think of any source. However, here is my reasoning: Older constitutions (like the U.S.) do not even mention "political parties", let alone make any prescriptions for the activities (Just remember George Washington's Farewell Address!) More recent constitutions, say the Italian of the mid-1940s and the French of the late 1950s, assign a role to political parties but don't make any prescriptions either. The German Basic Law of 1949 bothered to state that "parties have to account to the public for their sources of funds". No research needed - plain professional knowledge. How can you go about it in Misplaced Pages? ] (]) 05:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
:*"Four events or decisions may have caused this trend: . . .". Since this is opinion or speculation I would prefer to have it sourced, to avoid "original research", though rewording to stress the changes more than the causation would also be an option. | |||
I'll try rewording! ] (]) 06:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
:--] (]) 13:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
Hi, Boson, many thanks again for taking such a great interest in the article! I appreciate that very much. Above I have entered two comments to your valuable details. Early this morning I enlarged the introduction first and during the day I will go on improving the text without hurting any of your contributions. After that I'll prepare some data and put them on the talk page first (not without giving a short notice to you). ] (]) 06:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
:The problem with "stipulations of the German Basic Law have been far ahead of other constitutions in modern democracies", as I see it, is that it might falls foul of ]/]. I think Misplaced Pages defines "original research" in a very restrictive way (reasoning is limited to things like simple arithmetic) because several editors can contribute to an article and we do not verify credentials, meaning that we cannot ''rely'' on an unknown editor having the necessary background knowledge and skills to make correct assessments. "Other constitutions" implies "''all'' other constitutions" without explicitly naming any, and "ahead of" can be seen as a value judgement, implying "better". I don't think it is a serious problem but it might be better to state that the German Basic Law has (more detailed?) provisions on parties that are not found in other (older?) written constitutions such as . . . (as you have written above). This may not completely solve the problem, but it makes the individual parts of the statement more objectively verifiable. Just a thought! --] (]) 07:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Hi, thanks again for this very reasonable suggestion! I will try to follow your advice. ] (]) 11:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=926750232 --> | |||
== Council of the European Union == | |||
Hi, this is just a short note about the state of my activity. I have completed my effort to weed out the typos and added a few minor points. The data, however, will take some more time because my printer is currently unable to print PDF files. We'll have it fixed as soon as possible and then I shall enter die data for bar or pie charts on the article's talk page. You'll be informed when this step has been completed. So long, ] (]) 17:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
You may be interested to contribute to the discussion at ]. --] (]) 17:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Hi, Boson, I have put the data for pie or bar charts on the "Party finance in Germany" Talk page. Unfortunately the saving process destroyed the layout which had looked quite o.k. during the editing. I hope you can handle that. It helps to go back to editing status. Thanks a lot!] (]) 06:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
(watching:) sadly, Boson's last edit dates to 2018. --] (]) 18:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
:I have converted the data into "floating" sortable tables and put them straight into the article. Floating tables have the advantage that they break up the wall of text (like images) and they can easily be displayed on the left or right of the text, which automatically flows round the table. Perhaps you could check if the figures are all OK. Since there are several data groups, I wasn't sure about the simple graphs that I can do. If you wanted pie charts, we would need one for each party, I think. With bar charts, we would need a group of several bars for each party, which also gets a bit more complicated. Anyway, see what you think of the tables. By clicking on the little arrows, the table can be sorted by any column. --] (]) 19:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
== "Harvest Home Action" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Harvest Home Action'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px">]]]</span> 05:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Happy... == | |||
Dear Boson, thank you very much for this excellent operation! The tables look great. I checked all the data, they are perfect. And the interactive mode is the icing on the cake. As for pie and bar charts: Indeed, I was thinking of a pie (actually two separate pies) for each party. I also have seen (aggregated) bar charts with just one bar per party where each element (of spending or revenue) sits on top of the other. Thus you get the same impression as in the pie charts, but the individual bars also present the (comparable) size of the various parties. I absolutely agree with you that individual bars for individual items do not make much sense. Would you mind if I think of some more tables and we go through the same procedure again? All the best & Thanks again! ] (]) 06:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
:More tables shouldn't be a problem. I think you probably want a stacked vertical bar chart, as described at ], but I am not familiar with how to do these. I see the pie chart is also described as experimental. So perhaps we can concentrate on getting the tables done before possibly asking someone else for assistance with the graphics. --] (]) 21:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
Hi Boson, I have entered additional data for an additional table on the talk page. Hopefully you can repeat the trick of turning those into a perfect table just like the others. Thank you very much, ] (]) 16:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: gold;" | |||
:Hi Khnassmacher, I have added the table. I didn't make it sortable this time but you can add or remove the word "sortable" to change that. As before, please check that I haven't messed up any of the figures. --] (]) 17:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| style="text-align:center;" |] | |||
| style="text-align:center;" width="100%"|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:darkblue">Hey, '''Boson'''. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the ]!<br />Have a great day!</span> ] (]) 07:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Hi Boson, I have checked the data. They are all fine and the new table looks prefect, too. Thank you very much for your help. Obviously there is nothing much that can be done at the moment. So, I'll just wait for the new rating to come up sometime around. All the best, ] (]) 05:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| style="text-align:right;" |] | |||
|} | |||
==Missing== | |||
==Notifications box replacement prototypes released== | |||
Hi. You are now ]. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 16:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Hey Boson; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to ] for more detail on how to enable them. ] (]) 15:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
== Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer == | |||
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Removal from member list</span>] | |||
You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee ]. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself. | |||
Best wishes, <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 16:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
it was nazi germany's motto but dianna wrongfully removed, what is your opinion need a third party view in the Talk:Nazi_Germany#Motto ] (]) 08:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
== FAR for European Parliament == | |||
== Courtesy notification == | |||
I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] <sub> '']''</sub> 04:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
Hi Boson. I indirectly mentioned you at WP:ANI, as I posted a diff from your talk page in a discussion thread there. The thread is ]. Best, -- ] (]) 21:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | |||
] | |||
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate; however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | |||
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 06:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:40, 24 March 2023
This user left Misplaced Pages. Boson has not edited Misplaced Pages since December 1, 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This is Boson's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 5 days |
Category:Pan-European advocacy groups
Please see Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_August_15#Category:Pan-European_advocacy_groups, where Category:Pan-European advocacy groups has been nominated for renaming. – Fayenatic London 22:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- This thread should be archived. --Boson (talk) 09:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
2019
Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht
begin it with music and memories
Thank you for your project help last year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Please check out "Happy" once more, for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. I wanted that for 1 January, but then wasn't sad about having our music pictured instead. Not too late for resolutions, New Year or not. DYK that he probably kept me on Misplaced Pages, back in 2012? By the line (which brought him to my attention, and earned the first precious in br'erly style) that I added to my editnotice, in fond memory? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Requested move: Chairman → Chair (officer)
Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019
Any input would be appreciated. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
... six years - miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Council of the European Union
You may be interested to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Council of the European Union#Upper House?. --Red King (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
(watching:) sadly, Boson's last edit dates to 2018. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
"Harvest Home Action" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harvest Home Action. Since you had some involvement with the Harvest Home Action redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. buidhe 05:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Happy...
Hey, Boson. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC) |
Missing
Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Removal from member listYou have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.
Best wishes, Chris Troutman (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
FAR for European Parliament
I have nominated European Parliament for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 04:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Categories: