Misplaced Pages

User talk:Resaltador: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:24, 29 May 2013 editElizium23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,953 edits Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on The Salvation Army. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:22, 23 March 2015 edit undoResaltador (talk | contribs)132 edits highlighter 
(27 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Resaltador the highlighter Resaltador the highlighter


== May 2013 == == Re: Stalking ==

] Please do not add commentary or your own ] to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to ]. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's ] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> ] (]) 19:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. ] (]) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:22, 23 March 2015

Resaltador the highlighter

Re: Stalking

Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. Viriditas (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)