| Revision as of 11:36, 30 May 2006 view sourceKhorshid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,835 edits →Attacks← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:36, 2 March 2020 view source Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,200 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:LukasPietsch" ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (51 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| class="infobox" width="270px" | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|]<br/>] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |||
| == File:Mensural notation lig 008.png listed for deletion == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 01:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| While I appreciate your concern, as far as I can see things, there is no other way to handle the situation at the current moment. The simple fact is that there is a good deal of incivility going on in these debates, and it must be dealt with accordingly. It doesn't have to be me, but whoever it is, we can't just allow wikipedia users to do whatever they please, especially when it's this widespread, and over such a controversial topic. A month ago, the only time many of these users stopped throwing racial slurs at each other was when they were blocked for 3RR violation. Now, while I'm not sure if it's really making that much of a difference, at least there is some sane debate going on. I certainly don't plan to do this forever; that would imply that nothing will change. I've told these users that I don't know anything about the content disputes they're in, so I'm not even getting involved there; I'm just sticking around until everyone's playing nice here. I don't believe I've been overly strict; many of these users have been warned about these things a dozen times or more, and most just shrug them off. Of COURSE there's ethnic/nationalistic bias coming from many of these users, but that doesn't make it right to throw the terms around. If someone truly cannot make neutral edits, how is accusing them of that fact going to do any good? No, that's more a matter left up to an RfC or an RfA, if need be. Otherwise, it's just an accusation, which I still see as a personal attack (as, again, it concerns the user, and not the edits they are making). Don't you agree it would be much more productive to simply say what's wrong with another user's edits? Because that's what I'm trying to stress to all these users; it's wikipedia policy, and I believe it's the only chance these debates have of simmering down. These users have to stop trying to figure out what's behind everyone else's screenname and start focusing on contributions and contributions alone. Anyway, while I welcome your input, I haven't changed my stance twords Zora's comment, and will reafirm that stance shortly to them, so there is no confusion. --] 23:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| :Regardless of intentions, the simple fact is that it's innapropriate to discuss another user in just about any form. Even if it's well meaning, it's all too easy to misinterprit, which is why Misplaced Pages asks that you just avoid it altogether. --] 18:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>], unclear use/purpose</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Minio and Mazaris Articles == | |||
| Oule, Ave, and Hello again my friend. I appreciate the compliment for the updates I have provided for the Minio article. Just so you know, I based the updates off of the first chapter of Wright's work. I must thank you for providing the source and adding it to the overall article. Of course, the Minio article is still incomplete. If there is anything wrong with the article as it is currently, then I expect you (or anyone else for that matter) to make the necessary corrections/additions. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I am elated to hear that you managed to acquire Mazaris' work ''Journey to Hades''. If you did not find anything pertaining to the differences between Albanians and Arvanites, then update the article as you see fit. However, for every update you provide, please provide a quote from the work in Greek (or in translated English if the Greek quotes in the work are not available). | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| As for Mazaris' first name, I will try to see if I can verify it for you. As I said before, there is not a lot of information on the Internet pertaining to the life and times of Mazaris. In the end, if I fail to provide clear confirmation of Mazaris' first name, then I expect you to change the name title of the article from "Maximus Mazaris" to just "Mazaris" (if you can). In all honesty, I am not worried about how the name of the article will pan out in the end. All I want is to see Mazaris have his proper place in the archives of Misplaced Pages and on the Internet in general. | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Would you be so kind as to tell me where you managed to find Mazaris' work? I am asking only because I want to see if I can access this tome and learn for myself about what Mazaris stated about the populations in the Peloponnese. If you cannot remember, then do not worry about it. I agree, for the most part, with your analysis of the peoples in the Peloponnese based on your reading of Mazaris' work. | |||
| <blockquote>], unclear use/purpose</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Lakedaimons = Tsakonians (Greeks) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Egyptians = Gypsies (interesting; I thought it would be more on the lines of people coming from Egypt) | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Peloponnesians = Greeks | |||
| == Portal:Macedonia listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Portal:Macedonia'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 05:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a portal which would be subject to ] if it were an article. | |||
| Slavs = Slavs | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Portal%3AMacedonia|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-p1-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 06:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Jews = Jews | |||
| Illyrians = Albanians | |||
| To be honest, the last part of your analysis (Illyrians = Albanians) sent my sociological senses tingling. Yes, I said "sociological senses", which are sort of like the kind of senses Spider-Man has only completely different and unrelated to anything that entails radioactive arachnids. Anyway, I am glad you stated that Mazaris' work provides no differentiation between Albanians and Arvanites. However, in the case of the Arvanites, we see works from Attaliates and Anna Komnena utilize words that are similar, but not the same (you know, "Albanoi" and "Arbanitai"). Sociologically speaking, Greeks always had a knack in geopolitics and were actually pretty good (not all the time mind you) when it came to understanding ethnic groups that were actually distinct even if they spoke similar languages. | |||
| What if Mazaris intentionally placed the Arvanites and the Albanians in one group? Prior forms of Byzantine scholarship would have either used "Albanoi" or "Arbanitai" being that each word discussed about a unique ethnic populace (even if they, coincidentally, sound similar). However, Mazaris (based on your analysis and my being bereft of the book itself so that I can verify certain things) used the word "Illyrians". This is not exactly surprising being that Priskos in the 5th century AD used the work "Scythian" in one of his works to describe the dress of a Greek person he met. We know the real Scythians were not present in the 5th century AD (if I am wrong, then someone please inform me right now). | |||
| Anyway, why would Mazaris utilize a geographic term to describe people that modern scholars would deem today as "Albanians"? Of course, the Albanians would state that Mazaris utilized the word "Illyrians" in order to directly describe the Albanians in the Peloponnese. However, social reality dictates that both Albanians and Arvanites migrated into Greece from Dalmatia (or "Illyricum" if you prefer to utilize the Roman term). Mazaris may very well have utilized the word "Illyrians" to make it easier for his linguistic analysis and bundle up any peoples (regardless if they were Arvanites or Albanians) that generally came from the regions of Illyricum and supposedly spoke the same language. Of course, I could be wrong being that this is a sociological analysis and Misplaced Pages is not exactly giddy in listening to a sociologist. | |||
| I know you are going to hate me for this, but Arvanitika sounds more like a Greco-Albanian language rather than just a plain Albanian dialect. Give me a second to prepare myself for the millions of hatemail messages that will flood my inbox from linguists of all brands and creeds. Better get my shield and fortify the castle walls. | |||
| When you hear Arvanitika, the first thing that comes to your mind is that the person you hear speaking Arvanitika is supposedly an "Albanian." Mazaris probably utilized this sort of thinking while writing his work. Of course, by the 15th century, it is a social fact that the Greeks spoke many languages that were, more or less, based on a Greco- combination. Just so you know, the Greeks did this for adaptation purposes so as to increase their chances of survival by pretending, linguistically, to be people they have no ethnic affiliations with while at the same time being able to communicate with other Greeks. I could give you more details if you are interested. | |||
| So, the Albanians base their claim of the "Arvanites being Albanians" more so on language than on sociological processes and trends. Last time I checked, language is not the only factor in defining your ethnic background (I am sure you know this already). Language is a social construct mainly utilized for communications purposes. It is an important tool for communicating with others who are from the same ethnic group, but people utilize different languages (or combination of languages) in order to establish better lines of communication for diplomatic, economic, and even military affairs. In short, language alone is not enough to determine an ethnic group's background. It helps, but only to a limited extent. Case in point, I do not hail from jolly old England just because I can make my vocal chords produce sounds that might make people think I love Margaret Thatcher or assume that I eat fish-and-chips. | |||
| Would it be alright with you if I could place a sociological analysis of Mazaris' work? Oh, how wonderful it would be to do so. If you feel that it is unnecessary, then I understand. I am only asking because a sociological analysis may enrich one's knowledge of the social context from which Mazaris' work came from (it is just not enough to only provide a linguistic analysis of an ethnic group's history these days). | |||
| I apologize my friend for writing so much (damn sociologists and their sociological ). However, I wanted to explain certain things to you in detail so that you can better understand where I am coming from in case I state something you may not agree with. Nice talking to you, take care, and excellent work on the Mazaris article. Thank you for your help. If you want to continue this nice conversation, then feel free to leave a message in my inbox whenever you have a "wikibreak" (wikibreak = Western European break = tea and crumpets; just kidding). Over and out. - Deucalionite 4/11/06 8:37 P.M. EST | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thank you for reverting , although I think the anon guy who did it deserves a beer for his humor! ] <sup><font size="-2">] ] ]</font></sup> 16:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration == | |||
| Hello. At your arbitration statement about three weeks ago, you indicated you planned to present evidence against Zmmz, ManiF, Khashayar Karimi, and ZereshK, but you have yet to do so. Could you please spend some time on this, as I'd like to get the case moving, but don't want to act without all the evidence. Thanks. ]·] 05:33, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Lukas, could you check your e-mail? ]<sup>]</sup> 04:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Another one. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::E-mailed. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nominated for deletion for a fourth time== | |||
| The article ] has been ]. I noticed that during its past nominations for deletion you voted to have the article deleted. If you have time, please support me in my attempt to have this article deleted by casting your vote in favour of deletion. Thank you. - ] 07:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == How perceptive of you == | |||
| The editwarring is just part of my work as an undercover Arab. Stealthily, stealthily, I creep about WP, smearing everything with the touch of that insidious broken plural. ] 18:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==My English is very bad but== | |||
| Sorry, my english is very bad. | |||
| Before the ] movement the albanian L. it was written in three ways: latin, old greece and arabian. After the Rilindja decided that albanian L. must be written in lain some religion (church, moshe) istutition they dident stop to write in their way. The arabic "shkrimi arab i shqipes" way it was stoped from the albanians and they have started to write in latine with some terms from islam. The catholic church (west rite) uset latine way but they use also more latine latine. The orthodox church has don in same way like the catolich church, they have keeped they old greec writing of Albanian L. and uset more term from old greece language. Ofcourse, for exempel one muslim Albanian wehne he talk with the catholic or the orthodox who is leven in a part with Albanian school then dont have a problem. But in the North of (today) Greec they dont have that and user the term from the Church to speek Albanian L. Also Arvanitas is not a language more then local spoked language in Gjirokastra, Korça or any region down there. Arvanistas is even the dialect of the Albanian language, the only differen is the terms they use and how they write the Albanian L. For beter understandeng, each regularn member of the albanian orthodox church can speek this, how to say the religion version of the Albanian language. Ofcourse they diden haved the Schools in Albanian language and that maked it a littel bit difrent from standart Albanian L. This is in more places but hier is apecial beacose they write till today in "old grecce" way (user the old greece alfabet). I holpe that you have understand it. --] 19:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Hi, thanks for the Irish and German translations :-) ] 15:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Indeed == | |||
| Well, I was. He taught part of our module on ] -- which finished at the end of April -- I'm currently waiting for the grade back from one of my essays, which is online if you are interested. He's actually a very good lecturer :) It was one of my favourite modules during the whole degree. - ] 15:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| =="Glocalisation"== | |||
| yes, "sic" - I had read the article, and knew it wasn't a spelling error. That's exactly why I put that "sic" in... :-) BTW, I hear you are studying with Trudgill? ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 15:30, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I thought ] was used when there was a spelling mistake that should be acknowledged. However I just read the article and I see its for "unusual" spellings too. - ] 15:36, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah, good, so you wouldn't mind if we put it back in? - I'd seen a reference to your essay somewhere and gave it a cursory look the other day. Certainly looks like a nice piece of work - good to have some linguistics-savvy people around here. And I'm glad to hear you liked Trudgill as a teacher - we are currently planning to get him as a visiting professor at our place some time next year. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 15:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Sure, no problem :) Btw, I highly recommend Trudgill (in case you hadn't got that before) :) - ] 15:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Aucaman case == | |||
| Hi Lukas. Can you be more specific when you say "collective POV pushing" or "divisiveness/factionalising behaviour"? What does it consist of, who has been doing it, etc.? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 16:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you, I'm reading through it again. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm afraid at this late stage, it seems more practical to close the case than to open a bunch of new modifications. Most of the things you propose do seem to be similar to current plans, but with varying degrees, some of which I certainly don't agree with (lightening the Aucaman remedies), and some for which I am still optimistic that probation can resolve (ManiF and KashK). In any case, the case will probably be closing soon. ]·] 17:45, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The truth of the matter is that the raw evidence is the most useful, the arguments are less so, but once it becomes screens of screens of bickering, it's mostly useless and not worth the arbitrators' time. ]·] 18:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks for telling me. I didn't know honestly.. :-) ] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> 20:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for telling me too and I didn't know honestly too. --] 22:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| re: "Aucuman is uncivil" | |||
| But how can a group of people decide about the "personality" of and editor? Even a couple of actions should not give the others the right to judge about the personality of some editor. The title should be "Aucuman edits uncivil". --] 22:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I am not a native speaker but think even writing in an uncivil manner does not prove he IS uncivil (this is a generalization). I posted a comment on the talk page anyway. I hope I could edit on the talk page. --] 23:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Related ethnic groups in ] == | |||
| Hi Lukas:). i saw that u have been involved in the discussion concerning the ethnic groups related to the Greeks. although it seems difficult to list separate groups (cause the Greeks form an IE branch on their own), we could list seperately, i think, only some peoples. i would say the Italians , Albanians and Armenians, fit better in this case. cause of the Graeco-Latin, Pelasgian and Graeco-Armenian hypothesises respectively. saying just 'Indoeuropean', is not info given to the readers, cause we are talking about c2 billion related people (not to say that by mentioning that the greeks are indoeuropeans, it is just a repetition!). by including Slavs and turks, we could possibly be closer to the truth, '''but''' the turks are considered an Altaic group (for reasons that i know u are aware of) and the slavs represent a communication with the greek people, for only less than the half of their history, and with no accounts for further relations, but only the fact that they are both indoeuropeans. my POV would be: related ethnic groups:Italians, Albanians, Armenians, and other Indoeuropean peoples. the case is confusing, and i am not sure if i am right or wrong, though...--] 01:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :My take on the issue is that this really all just demonstrates how confusing and useless that category is in itself. We should just scrap it. :-) You want to go by linguistic affiliation (in the genetic-linguistic sense, which gives "relatedness" of three millenia back); others might prefer "relatedness" through cultural similarities (which would put the focus on much more recent developments); or more recent language contact; or geopolitical links, or genetic admixture - take your pick. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 06:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This arbitration case is now closed and the decision is published. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee. --14:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Protection== | |||
| I guess the edit warring around the ] is postponed for now, so maybe we should cancel the request for protection. ] 15:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I already did that, actually. Glad to see you guys have worked something out there. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 15:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I can see that protection will be back on the agenda. I cannot accept the ignorance and irridentist agenda by editors who push Republic of Macedonia extremist line against Bulgaria or anyone else. Perhaps they are brainwashed so it is not their fault. As you see, I write this and I have not made any changes in the article but I think I will have to because they are speaking the facts. ] 15:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Smiley Template== | |||
| After some thought I decided to create this smiley template, as I thought most of the arguments in the talk pages are due to misinterpretaion of what is being said, hopefully these smileys will help us (at least me {{smiley|1}}!!) communicate in a much more friendly manner. Hope you all will like it. | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|1}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|1}} (Friendly smile) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|2}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|2}} (Confident) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|3}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|3}} (Mocking) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|4}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|4}} (Hysterical) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|5}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|5}} (Hurt) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|6}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|6}} (Very Sorry) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|7}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|7}} (Sleepy) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|8}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|8}} (You are Nive) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|9}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|9}} (I am not happy) | |||
| *<nowiki>{{smiley|0}}</nowiki> will produce {{smiley|0}} (No Comments) | |||
| ] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> 20:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == From Persian Magi: Iranian Peoples == | |||
| It seems like someone has in fact read my weblog and in fact disliked it. Read his signature: am not sure why the person in the Fortunately, he does not say, the weblog is his. He might be someone I know or he might know me! I am not sure. Anyhow, I was not the one who posted the request. ] 06:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Albanian== | |||
| Have you seen the map in ] where it is implied that a) Arvanitika is an Albanian dialect and that b) it is the principal language of Epirus? ] 23:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :No it doesn't - it's not coloured like Kosovo, Albania or FYROM. See the discussion at ] as well, please. ] 23:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, as we've discussed hundreds of times, Arvanitika ''is'' an Albanian dialect. Period. :-) As for the map, its colours are hard to read on the screen of my computer here. (Oh, and Miskin, could you please adopt a habit of creating new talkpage topic under a new header?) ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 07:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category Deletion== | |||
| Please visit and weigh in! ] <sup><font size="-2">] ] ]</font></sup> 18:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Do you have an opinion on...== | |||
| ? ] <sup><font size="-2">] ] ]</font></sup> 10:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :hmmm, no, not really... ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 10:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am responding as we speak...responded...] <sup><font size="-2">] ] ]</font></sup> 10:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikisource in Ancient Greek == | |||
| There is an ongoing initiative to create a Wikisurce in Ancient Greek. Please provide your comments at ].] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> 13:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Yes, it's irretrievably POV == | |||
| I voted for Delete and left my reasoning on the AfD page. Thanks for taking the initiative on this. | |||
| I was going to rant about how disgusting it is that people waste so much time feeling sorry for themselves (the Arabs and British and Americans have oppressed me, boo-hoo) but then realized I've spent a great deal of MY life doing that too. My mother f*cked me up -- big deal -- move forward, Zora. | |||
| And now it's time for a bout of late-night baking. I have to prepare a treat for the people finishing a meditation retreat at my zendo. ] 08:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ?? == | |||
| Lukas, | |||
| Please cool it down and assume ]. | |||
| You obviously were not involved in the anti-Persian article. So my comment did not refer to you. | |||
| Please leve me alone. | |||
| Thank You.--] 21:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Zereshk: Were you referring to me? I did not support any Iranian editor's ban from Misplaced Pages.--] 21:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I know you didnt Ahwaz. Wasnt refering to you there.--] 21:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ah, so you were just referring to the thin air then? Listen, I don't care ''who'' you're insulting, whether it's me or others. Just stop it. I stand by my warning, please take it seriously. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 22:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Lukas, I'm asking again: please stop wikistalking me. Thank You.--] 00:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You were insulting a group of users which could be understood to include me. I have every right to react to that, and I will continue to watch that kind of behaviour in the future. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 00:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Attacks == | |||
| Dear Lukas, here's my responce: | |||
| "Sina, with this edit () you've crossed a line. Not only are you accusing people of vandalism simply because they disagree with you, which is bad enough already. But your insinuation about being paid agents is a grave insult (plus of course absolutely ridiculous). No matter who you meant by this, this is a blatant personal attack which won't be tolerated" | |||
| * In edit , I only disagreed with you. You are accusing Iranians (in general) of being blind voters and attackers ! Isn't it an insult ? | |||
| * About the funding, that has been on the news (a US high ranking politician). That was not my claim or speculation. | |||
| * One question: some people voted for deletion "as per norm" or for Keeping "as per norm". Would you please let me know why you only react to the former ? | |||
| * You also accused some one of being a duplicate wikipedian. Do you remember ? There are many people (at least Iranians) who regularly check wikipedia but almost never contibute. So a "newcomer" may be an old associate. | |||
| Finally I am not a fanatic who can not tolerate other ideas. When I first tried to add how Persians suffered from arabs in ] article, some of those who now voted for deleteion, deleted my sourced edits suggesting me to make a separate article. However as I was not interested to make such hateful aticles, I just left without doing any thing. Thanks any way. --]22:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for your response. Just two or three points: | |||
| :*You were not just "disagreeing with me". You did accuse some (us?) of "vandalising". Please read up on ]. Calling something vandalism that is in fact a content dispute is insulting. | |||
| :*I was not accusing "Iranians (in general)" of being blind voters. That's another absurd fabrication of you. I did object to the method of votestacking, i.e. advertising of the AfD. That's something that's widely frowned upon by many editors on Misplaced Pages, and the misuse of the noticeboard for that purpose has been criticised before. | |||
| :*About the funding, would you please say it openly ''who'' you suspect of being in the pay of political organisations here? Me? Zora? Ahwaz? In any case, it's both insulting to the highest degree, and laughable. | |||
| :*As for that formulation: It's just a piece of AfD jargon, "nom.", not "norm". "nom" standing for "nomination" or "nominator". Kashk just got it wrong. | |||
| :*As for the new user, it's customary that very new users' votes can sometimes be discounted in such debates. I was just curious.] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 23:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Do not leave threats on my page or you will be reported. I see that you have been warned before. ] 11:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:36, 2 March 2020
File:Mensural notation lig 008.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mensural notation lig 008.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Mensural notation lig 016.png
The file File:Mensural notation lig 016.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, unclear use/purpose
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Mensural notation lig 004.png
The file File:Mensural notation lig 004.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, unclear use/purpose
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Portal:Macedonia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Macedonia. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Macedonia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Macedonia
A tag has been placed on Portal:Macedonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section P1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal which would be subject to speedy deletion if it were an article.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 06:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)