Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 02:32, 7 November 2024

Bhumihar

Ruler of the Benares State in 1870s, one of the both notable Bhumihar rulers
Regions with significant populations
East India	3,750,886 (2.87% of population of Bihar.)
Languages
Hindi, Bhojpuri, Magadhi, Maithili, Angika, Bajjika, Bundeli
Religion
Hinduism

Bhumihar, also locally called Bhuinhar and Babhan, is a Hindu caste mainly found in Bihar (including the Mithila region), the Purvanchal region of Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, the Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh, and Nepal.

They have traditionally been a land-owning group of eastern India, and controlled some small princely states and zamindari estates in the region in the early 20th century. They played an important role in the peasant movements and politics of Bihar. They claim Brahmin status, although their varna has been subject to much debate.

Etymology

The word bhūmihār is of relatively recent origin, first used in the records of United Provinces of Agra and Oudh in 1865. It derives from the words bhūmi ("land") and hāra ("one who seizes or confiscates"), referring to the caste's landowner status. The term Bhumihar Brahmin was adopted by the community in the late 19th century to emphasise their claim of belonging to the priestly Brahmin class. The alternate name Babhan has been described as an apabhramsha for brāhmaṇ (Brahmin).

History

As with many castes in India, there are numerous myths regarding the origins of the Bhumihar community. One legend states that they are the offspring of a union between Rajput men and Brahmin women, while according to another, they derive from Brahman-Buddhists who lost their high position in Hindu society. The Bhumihars themselves dislike these narratives involving "hybridity" or "fallen status", and claim to be pure Brahmins. Another legend states that they are the descendants of the sixth incarnation of Vishnu, Parashurama. As Parashurama was a Brahmin who carried out warfare like a Kshatriya, Bhumihars thus claim the traits of both the varnas.

By the 16th century, the Bhumihars controlled vast stretches of land in eastern India, particularly in north Bihar. By the late eighteenth century, along with Bihari Rajputs, they had established themselves as the most prominent landholders of the region. Oral legends suggest that along with Muslims and Rajputs, they displaced the Bhar and Chero natives of the region. The weakening of the Mughal suzerainty over the region gave rise to several small Bhumihar states. For example, the revenue contractors for the Mughal province of Awadh declared themselves the Maharaja of Benares. They successfully defended their independence against the Nawab of Awadh in the 1750s and 1760s, before becoming a British dependency. Other princely states and fiefdoms ruled by Bhumihars included Bettia, Tekari, Hathwa, Tamukhi, Sheohar, Mahishadal, Pakur and Maheshpur.

The distinctive Bhumihar caste identity was largely created through military service. During the early days of British expansion in India, Bhumihars under Raja of Banaras, Cheyt Singh participated in revolts against the East India Company. After his defeat, the Company started recruiting Bhumihar sepoys in large numbers until the Indian Rebellion of 1857.

In post independence India, according to author Rumela Sen, the majority of upper caste households, including those of Bhumihars, had landholdings of sufficient size to qualify them as "middle peasants". Though there existed few large landholders amongst them, the vast majority had economic status similar to middle peasants of Koeri, Kurmi and the Yadav caste. The general categorisation of all the Bhumihars being landlords is thus not a factually correct idea, as in urban areas latter were found to be engaged in variety of occupation. The upper crust among Bhumihars in urban areas were professionals and bureaucrats but many of them also worked as factory workers, coal miners and even load carriers (Mazdoors or the labourers).

Varna status

Among various narratives regarding their origin, composition and varna status, one states that there is an element of a low caste tribe called "Bhuyans" who gained land and assimilated with the Bhumihars. Many communities do not give them the ritual status of priestly Brahmins, as most of them were cultivators during the British Raj. Some of the early censuses of British India categorised Bhumihars of Bihar as Shudras, the lowest of the four varnas. This was considered insulting, especially since several zamindars (land-owning aristocrats) were Bhumihars. Unlike the Brahmans or Rajputs, the Bhumihars did not participate in the rebellion against British rule in India in 1857, but to their dismay, they were classified as belonging to the third varna in the ad-hoc census of 1865 and the regular census of 1881.

Sanskritisation

Like many other castes, the Bhumihars followed the process of sanskritisation to achieve their end. The Bhumihar zamindars and princely state rulers established caste-based associations (sabhas) to form a community network and to advance their claims to Brahmin status. The Pradhan Bhumihar Brahman Sabha ("Chief Assembly of Bhumihar Brahmins") was established in Patna in 1889. Its objective was "to improve moral, social and educational reforms of the community and to represent the wants of the community to the government". The Bhumihar Brahmin Mahasabha ("great assembly") was established in 1896. The local Bhumihar Brahmin Sabhas included the ones at Muzaffarpur (1899), Patna (1899), Gaya (1900) and Saran (1908).

These associations made numerous petitions to be classified as Brahmins in the 1901 census report. Persistent pressure from the Mahasabha, who glorified the history of the community, led to official recognition of the Bhumihars as Brahmins in the later Raj censuses. According to Ashwani Kumar, the Bhumihar claim to Brahmin status means that today "unlike other upper castes, guard the local caste hierarchy more zealously for they perpetually feel the pressure of being dislocated and discredited in the topsy-turvy world of caste."

Besides campaigning for the Brahmin status, the caste associations also played an important role in ensuring the general welfare of the community. In 1899, the Bhumihar Brahmin Mahasabha, with financial aid from a zamindar, established a college at Muzaffarpur. This was accredited to award degrees in the following year and it was a significant development because education in the area was improving rapidly but students desirous of furthering it had to travel to Bhagalpur, Calcutta or Patna. By 1920, 10 per cent of Bhumihars in Bihar were literate, making them one of the few literate castes; in this achievement, however, they were well behind the Kayasthas (33 per cent) and some other groups. In the first half of the 20th century, the Bhumihars suffered increasing economic hardships due to the steady fragmentation of land rights amongst heirs and the decline in agricultural prices during the Great Depression. During this period, the Bhumihar associations served as community networks that facilitated access to English education and urban employment. As with the Rajputs, Kayasthas and other high castes of Bihar – and as opposed to the methods used by most lower castes – neither the Mahasabha nor any other formal body exercised power to make and enforce caste rules.

The Bhumihar Brahmin Mahasabha held annual sessions in different parts of present-day Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Among its prominent leaders was Sahajanand Saraswati, a leader of the Bhumihar Brahmin Sabha of Patna. During the Balia session of 1914, Sahajanand defended the Brahmin status of the Bhumihars, using quotes from Hindu scriptures to argue that priestly functions do not alone define Brahmins. In 1916, he published a book titled Bhumihar Brahmin Parichay ("Introduction to Bhumihar Brahmins"), which outlined these arguments. He classified Brahmins into two categories – begging (yachak) and non-begging (ayachak) – and stated that the Bhumihars were among the non-begging Brahmins. The Bhumihars of Uttar Pradesh attempted to popularise the term "Bhumihar Brahmin", while discarding the term "Babhan". However, the term "Babhan" remained popular in Bihar. The recognised Brahmins did not favour the Bhumihar attempts to claim an equal status, and even stopped going to Bhumihar homes to perform ceremonies.

Political influence

The Bhumihars were influential in the politics of Bihar since the British days upto earlier decades of post independence India. Noted Bhumihar princely state rulers included Harendra Kishore Singh (Raja of Bettiah) and Vibhuti Narayan Singh (Raja of the Benares). However, in the latter years, the OBC consolidation in the state of Bihar led the dominant OBC castes like the Koeri, Kurmi and Yadav to take lead in acquisition of political power; they replaced the upper castes, the Bhumihars, Rajputs, Brahmin and Kayastha in the political circle. By 1990s, there emerged two political blocs in the state, led by Lalu Prasad Yadav and Nitish Kumar respectively, which represented these three castes.

The Bhumihars have also played a pioneering role in organising peasant, leftist and independence movements since the 1910s. In 1914 and 1916, the Bhumihars of Pipra and Turkaulia revolted against indigo cultivation. When Mahatma Gandhi launched a satyagraha against indigo cultivation in Motihari in 1917, a number of Bhumihar intellectuals joined the protest. These included Shri Krishna Singh (or Sinha), Ram Dayalu Singh, Ramnandan Mishra, Shilbhadra Yaji, Karyanand Sharma and Sahajanand Saraswati.

While a section of Bhumihars were landowners, the vast majority belonged to tenantry. Starting in 1914, two factions emerged in the Bhumihar Mahasabha: the landowner-dominated faction led by Ganesh Dutt, and the tenant-dominated faction led by Sahajanand Saraswati. Sahajanand came from a zamindar family, which had been reduced to tenant status. He attracted a large number of followers who, as tenants, were exploited by the rich landlords. His support for the non-cooperation movement also alarmed the landlords, who were loyal to the British colonial administration. The growing differences between the two factions resulted in a split in the Mahasabha, in 1925-26. Sahajanand established an ashram at Bihta, which started attracting tenants and peasants from other castes as well. When the rich Bhumihar landlords stopped supporting Sahajanand's activities, he declared that caste associations were a means to continue their supremacy. He established a caste-agnostic peasants movement, which later evolved into All India Kisan Sabha. In Bihar, Kisan Sabha, as well as the Communist Party of India (which was heavily inspired by Kisan Sabha), were identified as Bhumihar-dominated organisations for years.

After Sahajanand gave up caste politics, Ganesh Dutt emerged as the leader of Bhumihar Mahasabha. He later entered the Bihar Legislative Council, and distributed patronage to other members of his caste. This patronage was extended further, when Shri Krishna Singh became the Premier and Chief Minister of Bihar. His tenure saw the rise of a number of influential Bhumihar leaders including Mahesh Prasad Sinha, Krishnakant Singh, L. P. Shahi, Basawan Sinha, and Kailashpati Mishra. Singh also worked for the welfare of the lower castes. He was the first chief minister in India to abolish the zamindari system. He also led Dalits' entry into Baidyanath Temple.

After Shri Krishna Singh's death in 1961, the Bhumihar political hegemony gradually declined. A small number of Bhumihar leaders continued to play a significant role in the state unit of the Indian National Congress. These included Ramashray Prasad Singh, Rajo Singh, Ramjatan Sinha, Shyam Sunder Singh Dhiraj and Maha Chandra Singh. The Congress parliamentarians Ganga Sharan Singh (Sinha) and Shyam Nandan Prasad Mishra also belonged to the Bhumihar community.

The Bhumihar influence in Bihar politics declined considerably after the electoral defeat of Congress in the 1990 Bihar Legislative Assembly election. The backward OBC castes like Yadav, led by Lalu Prasad Yadav, replaced them in political circles. In the 1999 Indian general election, only three Bhumihars were elected: C. P. Thakur (BJP), Kailashpati Mishra (BJP) and Rajo Singh (Congress). A few Bhumihar leaders also emerged in the political parties dominated by the OBCs. These included Akhilesh Prasad Singh (RJD) and Arun Kumar (Samata Dal; now Rashtriya Lok Samata Party).

As their power in electoral politics declined, a number of Bhumihars were attracted to Ranvir Sena, a private militia established in 1994. The group has carried out armed attacks against the Naxals in the region, and has been involved in committing atrocities against the lower castes, such as the Laxmanpur Bathe massacre. The Ranvir Sena which employed Bhumihar youths emerged as the most feared caste force in Bihar. It was named after the 19th century chieftain, Ranvir Chaudhary, who became a cult figure among Bhumihars after taking on powerful Rajput Zamindars.

Currently, Kanhaiya Kumar is a notable example of a Bhumihar politician, currently serving as the All India Ccongress Committee Incharge of the National Students' Union of India.

Socio-economic condition

In 2023, Government of Bihar published the data of 2022 Bihar caste-based survey. The survey revealed several findings about the community. It showed that amongst the Forward Castes of Bihar, poverty was highest in Bhumihar caste. Out of total families of Bhumihars residing in state, 27.58% were poor (the community totally numbered 8,38,447 families, out of which 2,31,211 families were poor). The criteria for determining poverty was a sum of ₹6,000 (US$70) per month as family income.

Influence in other fields

Being one of the early literate groups of British India, the Bhumihar community produced several prominent literary figures. These include Ramdhari Singh Dinkar, Rahul Sankrityayan, Rambriksh Benipuri and Gopal Singh Nepali. In the field of journalism, Ravish Kumar is notable example of a Bhumihar.

Customs and traditions

The Bhumihars follow a subset of the Brahmin rituals, and claim to be "tri-karma" Brahmins.

Some Bhumihars in Muzaffarpur trace their lineage to Husseini Brahmins, and participate in the Muharram processions. The Bhumihars outside Purvanchal-Bihar region may follow the respective local customs and traditions. For example, in Chandipur village of Murshidabad district (West Bengal), a section of Bhumihars became the landlords after death of the British indigo plantation owners. They are now "thoroughly Bengali": they worship Kali as their primary deity, and are regarded as Brahmins by others in the village.

Common surnames

In Bihar, the Bhumihars started using the surname Sharma and the title Pandit in the 20th century. Other common traditional Brahmin surnames used by the Bhumihars include Mishra, Chaudhary, Dikshit, Tivan, Pathak, Pande and Upadhyaya. It is also common for Bhumihars to affix Singh (usually identified with Kshatriyas, especially Rajputs) to their name.

See also

• Sharma
• Kushwaha (surname)
• Singh

References

1. "What Bihar caste census data say". Indian express. 2 October 2023. Archived from the original on 2 October 2023. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
2. ^ Kumar (25 January 2005). "Bhumihars rooted to the ground in caste politics". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 30 September 2008. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
3. Freitag, Sandra B. (1992). Culture and Power in Banaras: Community, Performance, and Environment, 1800-1980. University of California Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-52008-094-2.
4. ^ Jain, Ravindra K. (2012). Nation, Diaspora, Trans-nation: Reflections from India. Routledge. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-136-70414-7.
5. Jha, Makhan (1997). Anthropology of Ancient Hindu Kingdoms: A Study in Civilizational Perspective. MD Publications. p. 33. ISBN 9788175330344.
6. Nedumpara, Jose J. (January 2004). Political Economy and Class Contradictions: A Study. Anmol. ISBN 9788126117185. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
7. ^ Das, Arvind N. (1982). Agrarian Movements in India: Studies on 20th Century Bihar. Psychology Press. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-0-7146-3216-2.
8. "MW Cologne Scan". www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de. Archived from the original on 3 August 2021. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
9. ^ Kumar, Ashwani (2008). Community Warriors: State, Peasants and Caste Armies in Bihar. Anthem Press. pp. 125–127. ISBN 978-1-84331-709-8. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
10. Sinha, Gopal Sharan; Sinha, Ramesh Chandra (September 1967). "Exploration in Caste Stereotypes". Social Forces. 46 (1). University of North Carolina Press: 42–47. doi:10.1093/sf/46.1.42. JSTOR 2575319.
11. "सभी भूमिहार-ब्राह्मण परशुराम के वंशज: आशुतोष". Hindustan. 2 January 2024.
12. "भूमिहार ब्राह्मण एकता व संस्कार मंच ने मनाई परशुराम जयंती". Dainik Bhaskar.
13. "Bihar Politics: बिहार में 'भगवान परशुराम वंशियों' के गढ़ में कड़ी फाइट, इस दफे फायरब्रांड के लिए आसान नहीं मैदान". Navbharat Times (in Hindi). Retrieved 22 October 2024.
14. "मुजफ्फरपुर में भगवान परशुराम की मूर्ति स्थापित करेगा भूमिहार ब्राह्मण सामाजिक फ्रंट - Bhumihar Brahmin Social Front to install statue of Lord Parashurama in Muzaffarpur". Jagran (in Hindi). Retrieved 22 October 2024.
15. Yang, Anand A. (1998). Bazaar India: Markets, Society, and the Colonial State in Gangetic Bihar. University of California Press. p. 139. ISBN 978-0-520-91996-9.
16. Yang, Anand A. (1989). The Limited Raj: Agrarian Relations in Colonial India, Saran District, 1793-1920. University of California Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-520-05711-1.
17. Bayly, Christopher A. (19 May 1988). Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion, 1770-1870. CUP Archive. pp. 17–18. ISBN 978-0-521-31054-3. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
18. Bayly, Susan (22 February 2001). Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age. Cambridge University Press. p. 203. ISBN 978-0-521-79842-6.
19. Barua, Pradeep (2005). The State at War in South Asia. U of Nebraska Press. p. 76. ISBN 0-8032-1344-1.
20. Roy, Kaushik (2004). India's Historic Battles: From Alexander the Great to Kargil. Orient Blackswan. p. 98. ISBN 978-81-7824-109-8.
21. Rumela Sen (2021). Farewell to Arms: How Rebels Retire Without Getting Killed. Oxford University Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0197529867. Archived from the original on 12 July 2022. Retrieved 12 July 2022. the majority of these high-caste households were small landlords with landholdings that might also qualify them as "middle peasants." Their economic status was very similar to the middle peasant households among the backward-caste (Bania, Yadav, Kurmi, and Koeri). Although the Maoists identified these backward castes as a sympathetic class, some landowning, backward-caste households actually had economic interests in common with the upper-caste farming families.
22. Bernard D'Mello (2018). India after Naxalbari: Unfinished History. NYU Press. ISBN 978-1583677087. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 27 May 2023. Nevertheless, the Bhumihars in Bihar are certainly not all "casteist" landlords. In the villages, there are Bhumihar landlords, but there are also Bhumihars who are small landowners. Of course, they consider it below their dignity to labor in the fields, especially ploughing the land, and as a result of their caste loyalty, they are politically on the same side as the big landowners of their caste. In urban areas, Bhumihars can be professionals, teachers, bureaucrats, judges, factory workers, coal miners, and even loading mazdoors.
23. George, A (2016). Social Ferment in India. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 242. ISBN 9781474291125. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
24. ^ Witsoe, Jeffrey (5 November 2013). Democracy against Development: Lower-Caste Politics and Political Modernity in Postcolonial India. University of Chicago Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-226-06350-8.
25. KUMAR, PURUSHOTTAM. “BHUMIHARS STRUGGLE FOR BRAHMIN STATUS (1857-1911).” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 56, Indian History Congress, 1995, pp. 739–41, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44158695 Archived 8 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
26. Action Sociology and Development. Concept Publishing Company. 1 January 1992. p. 121. ISBN 978-81-7022-726-7.
27. Kshirasagara, Ramacandra (1 January 1994). Dalit Movement in India and Its Leaders, 1857-1956. M.D. Publications Pvt. Ltd. p. 385. ISBN 978-81-85880-43-3.
28. ^ Kumar, Ashwani (2008). Community Warriors: State, Peasants and Caste Armies in Bihar. Anthem Press. p. 210. ISBN 978-1-84331-709-8.
29. Pinch, William R. (19 May 1996). Peasants and Monks in British India. University of California Press. pp. 83–84. ISBN 978-0-520-91630-2. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
30. Pandey, Shreedhar Narayan (1975). Education and Social Changes in Bihar, 1900-1921: A Survey of Social History of Bihar from Lord Curzon to Noncooperation Movement. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 6–7, 161, 172–173. ISBN 9780842609869.
31. Pandey, Shreedhar Narayan (1975). Education and Social Changes in Bihar, 1900-1921: A Survey of Social History of Bihar from Lord Curzon to Noncooperation Movement. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 171. ISBN 9780842609869.
32. Sinha, Arun (1991). Against the few: struggles of India's rural poor. Zed Books. ISBN 978-0-86232-718-7.
33. Kumar, S. (2018). Post-Mandal Politics in Bihar: Changing Electoral Patterns. India: SAGE Publications. ISBN 9789352805860. Archived from the original on 11 March 2023. Retrieved 11 March 2023.
34. ^ Singh, Abhay (6 July 2004). "BJP, Cong eye Bhumihars as Rabri drops ministers". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 30 September 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
35. Brown, Judith M. (26 September 1974). Gandhi's Rise to Power: Indian Politics 1915-1922. CUP Archive. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-521-09873-1. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
36. ^ "These days, their poster boys are goons". The Economic Times. 16 March 2004. Archived from the original on 17 December 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
37. Sajjad, Mohammad (13 August 2014). Muslim Politics in Bihar: Changing Contours. Routledge. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-317-55982-5.
38. ^ Kumar, Ashwani (2006). Community Warriors. Anthem Press. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-85728-684-0.
39. Sinha, Bindeshwari Prasad (2003). Kayasthas in making of modern Bihar. Impression Publication. p. vi. J.P's most intimate friend was Ganga Sharan Singh, a Bhumihar
40. Kumar, Ashwani (6 June 2012). "No gentlemen in this army". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 5 July 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
41. S.K. Ghosh; Srikanta Ghosh (2000). Bihar in Flames. APH Publishing. p. 56. ISBN 8176481602. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
42. "'तुरुप का इक्का' साबित होंगे कन्हैया कुमार? मनोज तिवारी भी हैं पुराने 'चावल'." News18 हिंदी (in Hindi). 15 April 2024. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
43. "भूमिहार पहचान में ही कैद क्यों रखना चाहते हैं कन्हैया को?". www.satyahindi.com. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
44. Bhelari, Amit (7 November 2023). "Bihar caste-based survey report | Poverty highest among Scheduled Castes, lowest among Kayasths". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 8 November 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
45. rti_admin (30 September 2021). "United by Brahmanwad: Ravish Kumar and Kanhaiya Kumar". Round Table India. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
46. "बिहार : यादव या भूमिहार!". ndtv.in (in Hindi). Retrieved 22 October 2024.
47. Ahmad, Faizan (21 January 2008). "Hindus participate in Muharram". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 13 February 2009. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
48. Nicholas, Ralph W. (1 January 2003). Fruits of Worship: Practical Religion in Bengal. Orient Blackswan. p. 35. ISBN 978-81-8028-006-1.
49. Gupta, N. L. (1974). Transition from capitalism to socialism and other essays. Kalamkar Prakashan. p. 165.
50. ^ Singh, Virendra Prakash (1992). Community And Caste In Tradition. Commonwealth Publishers. ISBN 978-81-7169-242-2.
51. Asian Studies at Hawaii. Asian Studies Program, University of Hawaii. 1978. p. 64.

Further reading

• Guha, Ranajit (2000). A Subaltern studies reader, 1986–1995 (2nd ed.). South Asia Books. ISBN 978-0-19-565230-7.
• Maitra, R. K. (1959). Indian Studies: past & present. ASIN B0000CRX5I.
• Sharma, R. S. (2009). Rethinking India's Past. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-569787-2.
• Ram, Bindeshwar (1998). Land and society in India: agrarian relations in colonial North Bihar. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-81-250-0643-5.
• Bayly, Christopher Alan (2011). Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire (Ideas in Context). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-10-760147-5.
• Bhadra, Gautam (2008). Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-565125-6.
• Alavi, Seema (2007). The Eighteenth Century in India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-569201-3.
• Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli (2009). The Hindu View of Life. Harper Collins. p. 81. ISBN 978-81-7223-845-2.
• Radha Kumud Mukherjee, Ancient Indian Education: Brahmanical and Buddhist, Motilal Banarsidass, New Delhi (2011).
• M. N. Srinivas, Social Change in Modern India, Orient Longman, Delhi, 1995.

• Social groups of Bihar
• Indian castes
• Hindu communities
• Social groups of Uttar Pradesh
• Agricultural castes