Revision as of 12:52, 4 July 2013 editAnon7mous (talk | contribs)98 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:07, 29 December 2024 edit undoICE77 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,166 editsm →Comments and questions on the article | ||
(50 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | {{Talk header |search=yes }} | ||
{{Article discretionary sanctions}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1= | ||
⚫ | {{ |
||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Croatia|importance=high}} | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Cities }} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Croatia |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Illyria |importance=Mid}} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
}} | }} | ||
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=b}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 150K | |maxarchivesize = 150K | ||
|counter = 6 | |counter = 6 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
|algo = old(60d) | |algo = old(60d) | ||
|archive = Talk:Zadar/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Zadar/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=MiszaBot I |age=2 |units=months }} | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | ||
|target=Talk:Zadar/Archive index |mask=Talk:Zadar/Archive <#> | |target=Talk:Zadar/Archive index |mask=Talk:Zadar/Archive <#> | ||
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes }} | |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes }} | ||
== |
== Ethnic Italians == | ||
Knowing that the Austro-Hungarian censuses only asked for people's "language of communication", how did we get to "local ethnic Italians" in ]. In that edit, not all sentences are sourced. The first and the third sentence most likely constitute ]. Can we get reliable sources, with exact quotations on this talk page, please. ] (]) 10:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Why this article is so subjective? There's vanished story about "Crystal night in Zadar" when on the 2nd of May 1991. Croats did horrible ethnic cleansing of 11 000 of Serbs and crashing Serb houses and shops, including cafe "Time out" of basketball player Serb ethnicity Marko Popovic (who today plays for Croat team). http://www.jadovno.com/intervjui-reportaze/articles/zaboravljena-zadarska-kristalna-noc.html ] (]) 16:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|Ponor}} First of all, thank you for writing to me in my talk. Yes, it's just a question of words: I'll remove "local ethnic" without any problems, it's actually a useless specification. ] (]) 12:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@]: we should follow the source as closely as possible. So, what EXACTLY does the source say? What is the source for the first added sentence? What is the source for the third added sentence? Per ], we may not lead the reader into believing "if A and B then C", if all three are not said in the source, exactly like that. | |||
::Also, I believe you should refrain from adding this same information to every possible article while this issue is under discussion. The conclusions you're presenting are highly controversial, and there's more to the story. For example, people faced limited opportunities unless they identified as "Italian." You're completely omitting that aspect. ] (]) 21:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{ping|Ponor}} Yes, I apologize, I thought the general problem was solved. I would say to wait for other opinions. ] (]) 23:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC). | |||
::::@], Misplaced Pages is source-based, not opinion based. So please, '''secondary sources''' first so we can discuss things. You're not allowed to synthesize from primary sources. Yes, there was Italian Exodus, but no, that was not the only source of primarily-Italian-speaking population decline, to my knowledge. ] (]) 14:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::@] No, sorry, if you have doubts about your personal knowledge, you should be the one to bring new sources, not me. ] (]) 14:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::@]: it's not about new sources, it's about any sources. If you attached a source to each sentence that you added I'd know what we're talking about and would be able to discuss it. If that's so hard, I'm beginning to think that's not what we'll find in any sources for ], ], ] and all others where you were adding these same words. So once again, what are the sources? Please, please, and please. ] (]) 15:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Comments and questions on the article == | |||
== Austrian policy == | |||
1. The climate section says "Snow is exceedingly rare, but it may fall in December, January, February and much more rarely in March. On average Zadar has 1.4 days of snow a year, but it is more likely that there isn’t snow." | |||
I am curious why ] changed "Under the ] Zadar was subject to the same policy" to "After ], under the ] Zadar was subject to the same policy" The policy was enacted some years ''before'' the completion of Italian unification, as is shown by the quote that ] provided from Emperor Franz Joseph. While the explicit policy may have been inspired by growing Italian nationalism, that should be stated and shown by citation, and not by an implied assumption. Congruity in time is not causation (], ] and ]. --] (]) 16:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
It needs two citations and it's redundant with "Snow is exceedingly rare, but it may fall" and "it is more likely that there isn’t snow". | |||
:Before Italian unification, Austrian political in Dalmatia was pro italian with the ], because Italian nationalism was considered less dangerous that the Croatian one. Hungarians (pro-Croatians) supported instead union of Dalmatia with Croatia ]. --] (]) 17:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Actually, that does not address the issue at all. The Austrians are not political parties. Also, it certainly does not provide a citation. --] (]) 20:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
2. The Early Middle Ages section mentions "agers". | |||
I linked ]... if you understeand Italian: "Negli anni Cinquanta e Sessanta, nel dibattito legato alle riforme costituzionali dell'Impero asburgico, i Croati, sostenuti dagli Ungheresi, aprirono una vivace polemica chiedendo l'unione della Dalmazia alla Croazia. Costituita nel 1861 la Dieta di Zara, si sarebbero confrontati al suo interno due partiti, l'autonomista e l'annessionista, l'uno sostenitore di una provincia autonoma all'interno della cornice asburgica, l'altro favorevole alla sua unione con la Croazia e la Slavonia in un'unica entità politico-amministrativa. Lo scontro era destinato a concludersi in un primo tempo con la vittoria dei Dalmati italiani, i quali avevano in quel momento il sostegno di Vienna ed erano favoriti dai provvedimenti insiti nella patente del febbraio 1861. Da parte dell'elemento croato era forte la volontà - sia in Dalmazia, sia in Croazia e Slavonia - di intervenire nella realtà politica ottenendo una trasformazione federale della monarchia." --] (]) 21:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Reading the above quotation, and not the source, it was still not the unification of Italy that caused the change in policy. It looks as though it was Croatian pressure that made the change, unless I am misreading: ''Da parte dell'elemento croato era forte la volontà - sia in Dalmazia, sia in Croazia e Slavonia - di intervenire nella realtà politica ottenendo una trasformazione federale della monarchia. Tale tendenza era diffusa soprattutto negli strati colti della popolazione, cioè preti e insegnanti, e le sempre più numerose sale di lettura esercitavano una forte influenza, in senso nazionale, tra le popolazioni dei centri minori.'' --] (]) 21:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Are those "a general term for a district or tract of country that belonged to a political society and had definite limits according to Roman law"? | |||
Yes, this is not directly indicated but Italian unification happened between 1861 and 1870 (Rome). Before Vienna was for the Dalmatian autonomists (this is reported by Treccani); on November 1866 Franz Joseph did is declaration against Italian elements in Dalmatia, Tyrol and Istria.--] (]) 21:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Fellas, you're in danger of being too Italo-centric in your thinking. The main reason why Austria backed Italians before 1866 (and yes, there was a reason other than charm ;)) was that Slavs were lobbying for union with the Kingdom of Croatia - which was part of the Hungarian crown. Austria did not want to lose its littoral provinces to Hungary. So it was the threat of Hungary that caused Vienna to back Italians (and that disappeared after the Compromise of 1867), whereas it was the threat of Prussia that caused Vienna to back Slavs. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- ] <span style="color:#464646">(])</span></font> 22:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
3. The same story is told in the High Middle Ages section with "In 1409, Venice, seeing that Ladislaus was about to be defeated, and eager to exploit the situation despite its relative military weakness, offered to buy his "rights" on Dalmatia for a mere 100,000 ducats. Knowing he had lost the region in any case, Ladislaus accepted. Zadar was, thus sold back to the Venetians for a paltry sum." and in the "15th to 18th centuries" section with "After the death of Louis I, Zadar came under the rule of Sigmund of Luxembourg and later Ladislaus of Naples, who, witnessing his loss of influence in Dalmatia, sold Zadar and his dynasty's rights to Dalmatia to Venice for 100,000 ducats on 31 July 1409." This is not only reduntant but also a misplacement. The first passage should be removed because it belongs in the 15th century. | |||
Yes Director, this is one of the causes but remember that Franz Joseph also cited ]. --] (]) 22:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:As I said, the cause behind an explicitly "anti-Italian" policy was the Austro-Prussian War and the threat of Bismarck. I am pointing out in addition that the cause behind the pro-Italian policy was the Croatian/Hungarian push for Dalmatia as a historic part of the "Triune Kingdom of Dalmatia, Croatia and Slavonia" that was part of the Hungarian crown since its annexation or personal union (depending who you ask) of 1102. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- ] <span style="color:#464646">(])</span></font> 23:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
*So, based on these comments and the quote from Treccani, it seems that there is agreement that it wasn't just Italian unification driving the policy, thus it is better to leave out Italian unification in that sentence, and leave causation unstated. --] (]) 04:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
4. The "15th to 18th centuries" section says "In contrast to the insecurity and Ottoman sieges and destruction, an important culture evolved midst the city walls." | |||
I do not completely agree. I replaced "Italian unification" with "1866" that gives to everyone a possibility of an interpretation.--] (]) 07:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Should "midst" be "within"? | |||
Come on Grifter72. This still create a link of causation. | |||
*There are not so many relevant things about Italy and the Italians happening those years. | |||
*Also I disagree on the organic matter. It is certainly true the policy of the Austrians become more evident in the second part of the 19th century but it was enforced well before. There is no proof of that and this is the reason why I am not insisting to put it in the text but the sharp decrease of Italian speaking people in Dalmatia in the period 1800 - 1850 are a demonstration of that. Again this is not a source and I do not insist on it, but also I am against putting a link of casuality unless does not sustained by a serious scholar or tertiary source. | |||
5. The list of landmarks includes the Five Wells Square which needs a description. | |||
However, I have put ''During the second part of the 19th century'' to reach consensus. | |||
6. The "Transportation" section says "As the company discounted bus-replacement service in 2020, Zadar has officially become the city without passenger railway connections." | |||
Also, I do not like the cn because it looks the entire sentence require a source. Do we need sources for things so evident? If the answer is yes I will provide one. | |||
And I do not understand why the reference to Franz Joseph has been removed from the text. This is EXTREMELY relevant. | |||
⚫ | |||
:I disagree on that point. Why is he personally relevant? <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- ] <span style="color:#464646">(])</span></font> 19:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:The quote is evidence of the policy and as such belongs in a Note, not in the text. Hardly ever is a quote appropriate in an encyclopedia main text. --] (]) 04:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::It's relevant because makes evident how clear was the policy of the Austrian Empire. However I see the point about the appropriateness of putting the quote in the main text. --] (]) 10:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
The passage is really unclear and needs revision. | |||
== 19th C. conflict between Italians and Croatians == | |||
7. The "Sports" section says "Other Sports: Badminton: Badminton club Zadar." which should be completed with a sentence and some more information. | |||
Can I have an explanation about this thing of ''This compound sentence lacks a parallel structure''? Thank you. --] (]) 10:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
8. The article lists various recipients of the "City of Zadar Award". It should also explain what that is. | |||
The sentence in question is: ''Until the beginning of the century it had been of moderate intensity and mainly of a class nature (under Venetian rule the Italians were employed in the most profitable activities, such as trade and administration), but with the development of the modern concept of national identity across Europe, national conflicts start to mark the political life of Zadar.'' The subject of the first part is ''it'' namely ''conflict between Italian and Croatian communities'', the subject of the second part is ''national conflicts''. I suspect that ''national conflicts'' is a euphemism for something else, since it does not mean "conflicts between nations". The sentence would have a parallel structure if the second half dealt with ''what'' the non-class nature of the altered conflict was, and dealt with the new "level of intensity" if there was one. If not, then intensity doesn't belong in the sentence. Parallel would be: The conflict was of X intensity and based on unequal opportunities in the workplace, but after Y events, the conflict was of Z intensity and based on differing political goals. Maybe shorter sentences would help. However it is rewritten, I hope that someone will have an appropriate citation to substantiate the data. --] (]) 10:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
9. The bust of Pope Sixtus I has nothing to do among the images that relate to architecture. It's uncorrelated and it's an outlier. I don't even think it should be in the article and it's not so important that it has to be there anyway unless there is some text talking about Pope Sixtus I. | |||
:OK, I will re-write the sentence to give it a parallel structure. ''National conflicts'' it is not an euphemism for something else. And I will add an appropriate citation to sustain the content of this sentence. | |||
--] (]) 04:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
10. The sections on demographics, economy, education and science should be before the section on the main sights. The section on notable people should be at the end. | |||
The sentence has been rewritten. I have also removed from the text the reference to the Panslavism. I cannot justify with a valid source other than the book from Monzali but this book is already quoted twice in this article and cannot be resonably used in support of a third statement. --] (]) 12:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
11. The list of twinned cities should have flags. | |||
== First newspaper == | |||
⚫ | ] (]) 21:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
Do you all want ''Il Regio Dalmata - Kraglski Dalmatin'' to be discussed under "19th Century" or under "Culture"? Right now almost the exact same text is duplicated in the article. --] (]) 11:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I prefer in "Culture". There were two other newspapers published in Zadar in that years. From 1832 "La Gazzetta di Zara" (in Italian) and from 1844 the "Zora Dalmatinska" (in Croat): http://antunbauer.mdc.hr/index.php/static/bibliografije/V_1 | |||
--] (]) 14:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Ok to put under "Culture". | |||
--] (]) 04:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Complete list of newspapers published in Zadar in XIX century: | |||
:::* '''Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin''' (1806-1810) - In Italian and Croatian. | |||
:::* '''Gazzetta di Zara''' (1833-1846) - In Italian. | |||
:::* '''Zora Dalmatinska''' (1844-1846) - In Croatian. | |||
:::* '''La Dalmazia''' (1845-1847) - In Italian. | |||
:::* '''Osservatore Dalmato''' (1849-1853) - In Italian. | |||
:::* '''Glasnik dalmatinski''' (1849-1866) - In Croatian. | |||
:::* '''La voce Dalmatica''' (1860-1863) - In Italian. | |||
:::* '''Il Nazionale''' (1862-1920) - In Italian from 1862 to 1876, then in Croatian with the name '''Narodni List''' (still living in Zadar, from 1946). | |||
:::* '''Il Dalmata''' (1865-1916) - In Italian (still living from 1950, today printed in Italy). | |||
:::* '''Hrvatska''' (1884-1897) - In Croatian. | |||
:::* '''Vuk''' (1885) - In Croatian. | |||
:::* '''Iskra''' (1891-1894) - In Croatian.--] (]) 11:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Some changes == | |||
* Jurai Dalmatinac, Lucijan Vranjanin and Frane Vranjanin names changed to their equivalent romance versions. This is to put the names in accordance with the the names used in the relevant articles in en:wiki. If some editor suppose the slaviks name should be used in the Zadar's articles, he/she is welcome to justify that with appropriate sourcing (but in the relevant articles ''first''). | |||
* I changed the wording, because Giorgio da Sebenico is not a ''renaissance man'' but an architect and sculptor. | |||
* Giorgio da Sebenico was ''probably'' born in Zadar. | |||
--] (]) 05:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Mayoral Election == | |||
] just changed the mayor of Zadar from ] to ]. Kalmeta won the recent election, in the first round he garnered 48.43% to Ivo Bilic's 31.98%, and in the second round it was 57% to Bilic's 40.38%. () But until Kalmeta takes office, I think that it is premature to change the name. If Kalmeta has already taken office, does someone have a citation to a reliable source for that fact? --] (]) 19:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:07, 29 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zadar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Ethnic Italians
Knowing that the Austro-Hungarian censuses only asked for people's "language of communication", how did we get to "local ethnic Italians" in Special:Diff/1260937330/1262425615. In that edit, not all sentences are sourced. The first and the third sentence most likely constitute WP:OR. Can we get reliable sources, with exact quotations on this talk page, please. Ponor (talk) 10:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ponor: First of all, thank you for writing to me in my talk. Yes, it's just a question of words: I'll remove "local ethnic" without any problems, it's actually a useless specification. LukeWiller (talk) 12:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- @LukeWiller: we should follow the source as closely as possible. So, what EXACTLY does the source say? What is the source for the first added sentence? What is the source for the third added sentence? Per WP:SYNTH, we may not lead the reader into believing "if A and B then C", if all three are not said in the source, exactly like that.
- Also, I believe you should refrain from adding this same information to every possible article while this issue is under discussion. The conclusions you're presenting are highly controversial, and there's more to the story. For example, people faced limited opportunities unless they identified as "Italian." You're completely omitting that aspect. Ponor (talk) 21:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ponor: Yes, I apologize, I thought the general problem was solved. I would say to wait for other opinions. LukeWiller (talk) 23:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC).
- @LukeWiller, Misplaced Pages is source-based, not opinion based. So please, secondary sources first so we can discuss things. You're not allowed to synthesize from primary sources. Yes, there was Italian Exodus, but no, that was not the only source of primarily-Italian-speaking population decline, to my knowledge. Ponor (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ponor No, sorry, if you have doubts about your personal knowledge, you should be the one to bring new sources, not me. LukeWiller (talk) 14:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @LukeWiller: it's not about new sources, it's about any sources. If you attached a source to each sentence that you added I'd know what we're talking about and would be able to discuss it. If that's so hard, I'm beginning to think that's not what we'll find in any sources for Trogir, Split, Krk (town) and all others where you were adding these same words. So once again, what are the sources? Please, please, and please. Ponor (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ponor No, sorry, if you have doubts about your personal knowledge, you should be the one to bring new sources, not me. LukeWiller (talk) 14:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @LukeWiller, Misplaced Pages is source-based, not opinion based. So please, secondary sources first so we can discuss things. You're not allowed to synthesize from primary sources. Yes, there was Italian Exodus, but no, that was not the only source of primarily-Italian-speaking population decline, to my knowledge. Ponor (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ponor: Yes, I apologize, I thought the general problem was solved. I would say to wait for other opinions. LukeWiller (talk) 23:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC).
Comments and questions on the article
1. The climate section says "Snow is exceedingly rare, but it may fall in December, January, February and much more rarely in March. On average Zadar has 1.4 days of snow a year, but it is more likely that there isn’t snow."
It needs two citations and it's redundant with "Snow is exceedingly rare, but it may fall" and "it is more likely that there isn’t snow".
2. The Early Middle Ages section mentions "agers".
Are those "a general term for a district or tract of country that belonged to a political society and had definite limits according to Roman law"?
3. The same story is told in the High Middle Ages section with "In 1409, Venice, seeing that Ladislaus was about to be defeated, and eager to exploit the situation despite its relative military weakness, offered to buy his "rights" on Dalmatia for a mere 100,000 ducats. Knowing he had lost the region in any case, Ladislaus accepted. Zadar was, thus sold back to the Venetians for a paltry sum." and in the "15th to 18th centuries" section with "After the death of Louis I, Zadar came under the rule of Sigmund of Luxembourg and later Ladislaus of Naples, who, witnessing his loss of influence in Dalmatia, sold Zadar and his dynasty's rights to Dalmatia to Venice for 100,000 ducats on 31 July 1409." This is not only reduntant but also a misplacement. The first passage should be removed because it belongs in the 15th century.
4. The "15th to 18th centuries" section says "In contrast to the insecurity and Ottoman sieges and destruction, an important culture evolved midst the city walls."
Should "midst" be "within"?
5. The list of landmarks includes the Five Wells Square which needs a description.
6. The "Transportation" section says "As the company discounted bus-replacement service in 2020, Zadar has officially become the city without passenger railway connections."
The passage is really unclear and needs revision.
7. The "Sports" section says "Other Sports: Badminton: Badminton club Zadar." which should be completed with a sentence and some more information.
8. The article lists various recipients of the "City of Zadar Award". It should also explain what that is.
9. The bust of Pope Sixtus I has nothing to do among the images that relate to architecture. It's uncorrelated and it's an outlier. I don't even think it should be in the article and it's not so important that it has to be there anyway unless there is some text talking about Pope Sixtus I.
10. The sections on demographics, economy, education and science should be before the section on the main sights. The section on notable people should be at the end.
11. The list of twinned cities should have flags.
ICE77 (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in Geography
- C-Class vital articles in Geography
- C-Class Croatia articles
- High-importance Croatia articles
- All WikiProject Croatia pages
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- C-Class Illyria articles
- Mid-importance Illyria articles
- All WikiProject Illyria pages