Revision as of 15:28, 4 July 2013 view sourceYogesh Khandke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,597 edits →I read your statement: more← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:11, 7 March 2022 view source MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:DangerousPanda/Templates/background|pagetop}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
{{no talkback}} | |||
|archiveheader = Things you probably never read on Bwilkins' talk page in the first place | |||
{{not around|may have left Misplaced Pages|DangerousPanda|27 December 2014}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
|counter = 12 | |||
|algo = old(15d) | |||
|archive = User talk:Bwilkins/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{User:Bwilkins/Templates/background|pagetop}} | |||
<center><small>'''''Note: please do not use talkback {{tl|tb}} templates here unless you are referring to discussion areas that I have not yet been a part of; I do monitor my conversations'''''</small></center> | <center><small>'''''Note: please do not use talkback {{tl|tb}} templates here unless you are referring to discussion areas that I have not yet been a part of; I do monitor my conversations'''''</small></center> | ||
{{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
<!--{{away| |
<!--{{away|August 4, 2014|I'm away in Europe on business. Don't worry, this page is being occasionally monitored by my ]}}--> | ||
{{WP:TPS/watched}} | |||
<br/><br/> | <br/><br/><br/> | ||
== Evidence submission closed for ''DangerousPanda'' arbitration case == | |||
== Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anti-Muslim pogroms in India == | |||
{{Archive-top|1=Let's leave this here. One can recognize the legitimacy of ArbCom, but there's no human being who can recognize the legitimacy of this decision. Talk about incivility, abuse of power, a failure to investigate even a smidgen of the supposed evidence. However, trials and summary execution ''in absentia'' is the lowest of the low. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 12:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
Hi DP, the evidence submission for the case closed today, the drafting arbitrators are willing to grant a brief extension for you to rebut the evidence which has been submitted if you ask for it in a timely manner. However they intend that the case will progress on schedule. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 08:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Hello DP. It might be in your interest to take the opportunity to respond. The evidence is significant though not open-and-shut. (The best organized summary is perhaps in the page at ]). The most significant thing (to me) is your over-the-top rhetoric in some cases, for instance . Callanecc said that you can provide rebuttal. I assume this means you can make a response at ]. I don't see much chance of progress unless you're willing to make a concession that some things you did weren't a good idea. Why not ask ] what section to respond in. It would be hard to be an admin and not make *any* mistakes. You might also make some promise on how you intend to use your multiple accounts in the future. Thanks, ] (]) 19:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::I haven't been involved in the case, or even really watching it, but I think it would certainly make sense for you to do what Ed suggests above. No one who has ever seriously considered being an admin, let alone anyone who has ever been one, honestly expects them to be perfect in all of their behavior. I have never gotten the impression that ArbCom tries to necessarily hold all admins to the standard of perfection. I have every reason to believe that any input you offer would be very seriously considered by the arbs and could very easily have a significant impact on their decision. ] (]) 20:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
*Panda, I agree with Ed. ] (]) 06:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::: {{replyto|Drmies}} {{replyto|EdJohnston}} {{replyto|John Carter}} Oh, it has always been my intent to respond. However, even NE Ent - and Worm that Turned - knew that I was going to be away from Misplaced Pages for about a month ''before'' he filed his ArbCom case ... a little difficult to respond when I'm nowhere near a computer. Today's my first day back, and I've found a great number of surprises <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
**FWIW, I think it would be s shame if ArbCom felt the need for drastic sanctions against you due to the absence of a response and clarification from you. IMO you're too good an admin for the project to lose you. (I believe that even if the Evidence section is closed, you can make your points in the Workshop.) ] (]) 02:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
* Why don't you all leave your thoughts in the Workshop? How many admin actions has DP done? Check the logs and count 'em. What percent of these actions have been criticised in the case? Is that an acceptable error rate? DP, are you so fed up with NE Ent <s>hounding</s> pursuing you that you are too <s>nauseated</s> worn down to respond? Does NE Ent have a history of <s>hounding</s> pursuing other administrators? These are all questions that should be addressed. I want to see both sides of this dispute presented effectively so there can be a fair result. Leaving the accusers to say whatever they like un-refuted is a mistake. ] <sup>]</sup> 04:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
I dispute your deletion of the article. This article obviously meets GNG, given the sources which discuss Anti-Muslim pogroms in India. It is a topic of legitimate academic inquiry as can also be seen from the references and is also widely discussed in the media, as can be seen from the sources given at the AFD. In your summary of valid reasons to delete you said "inflammatory title" This is not a justifiable reason for deletion at all per ] "When the subject of an article is referred to mainly by a single common name, as evidenced through usage in a significant majority of English-language reliable sources, Misplaced Pages generally follows the sources and uses that name as its article title" Every source in the article, as well as those given at the AFD use "Anti-Muslim pogroms in India" therefore it is not a violation of policy to have an article with this name. Your other reason for deletion was "sources" bar one all sources in the article were from academic publishers, can you explain please how the sourcing was not up to scratch? My last issue with your decision is that you say the information in the article is covered elsewhere, it is not. ] (]) 17:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
**Although NE Ent is, technically, an editor of Misplaced Pages, it has been a long time since he has been a '''''contributor''''' in any meaningful sense. He is, in fact, a '''''free-rider''''', using Misplaced Pages as a debating club and a social experiment for his own political and philosophical concerns. I'm sure he believes that his behavior is useful to the project in some fashion, but we have far, far too many NE Ents around here, and would do well to redirect their energies into actually '''''improving the encyclopedia;''''' if that's not possible, they should be gotten rid of.<p>One step towards redirecting them would be to start eliminating some of the large number of places which enable these folks to shirk actual editing in favor of social engineering. Another might be to institute some sort of ''quid pro quo'' whereby participation in those forums is dependent on a certain level of encyclopedia improvement.<p>Certainly, what we should '''''not''''' be doing is rewarding the free-riders' lack of value to the project by taking them seriously when they unnecessarily cause problems for editors who actually contribute to the encyclopedia. When '''''real contributors''''' disagree with other real contributors, '''''those''''' are conflicts which deserve the energy and attention of the community to resolve; when '''''free-riders''''' like NE Ent are in conflict with real contributors, they should not expect to be given the time of day, which just encourages further shirking. ] (]) 05:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
: I summarized the arguments that were the ones that weighed heaviest in the decision, and quite well I must add. I spent a significant amount of time reviewing that entire AFD and found there to be no question as to the delete decision - not even a single waffle (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 17:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
**:Funny rant! (No bias, for sure!) The arbcase is not yet closed, NE Ent is an involved party. So why not put your $ where your mouth is and go make a proposal for sanction ("{{tq|they should be gotten rid of}}"), Mr. Big Stuff!? ] (]) 04:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::You have not responded to a single question I have put to you, why not? ] (]) 17:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
***Re: "Mr. Big Stuff" Ouch, '''''that''''' hurt. What are you, 10? ] (]) 08:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::: I think if you read my answer, you'll see that I responded to all of your issues. You simply don't like the answer, and there's nothing I can do about that (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 18:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::No, you did not. I have requested deletion review . ] (]) 18:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::: I'm sure you'll remove your false statement: I never claimed at any point that an inflammatory title was reason for deletion. Lying won't help your process here, ] (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 18:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::That is twice now you have accused me of lying, it makes one wonder if perhaps you ought not have closed the discussion. "The result was '''delete'''. A summary of the '''valid arguments for deletion: inflammatory title'''" Retract your accusation please. ] (]) 18:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I give you better credit for reading English than that. If you cannot read, then you cannot hope to post here further. You're either lying, or you simply cannot read. As I said before ''I summarized the arguments'' ... that was one of the arguments that was made numerous times, wasn't it? Duh. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 18:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Did you or did you not write the following '''valid arguments for deletion: inflammatory title''' As you obviously did in fact write that then how am I lying by saying you said that it was a valid reason for deletion? Again, retract your personal attack. ] (]) 18:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::: I summarized OTHER people's arguments - therefore YOU ARE LYING when you claim that ''I'' said it - don't you understand the difference? It's a simple thing in English. So, retract ''your'' lie, OR your misunderstanding of the language. Your behaviour is really deteriorating. Do not return to this talkpage unless you have retracted your lie, ok? Thanks. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 20:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*Mr. BWilkins, could the ] of a deleted article be temporarily <code>(for 12/24hrs)</code> restored / userfied? Is that technically allowed? There are some arguments and comments by some editors/admins which I need to ''collect'', that's all, and then you can delete it perhaps? ]] <span class="plainlinks"></span> 06:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Your Arb Case == | ||
Hey DP - It looks like you're going to lose your mop. I wanted to say that regardless whether you have the mop or not, you're still a valued editor. I don't want to see you go over losing a flag. Perhaps you weren't ready for it, perhaps the Arbs got this wrong - in either sense, you're still ''needed'' here. <span style="font-family: MV Boli;">]]</span> 23:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
I'm far from happy with RPs response to the feedback to this unblocking and I am considering raising an RFCU/A. If I do, would you consider certifying the RFC? Further discussion on RP's talkpage if you wish to read the interaction. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 14:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Hell, yes. Speaking from experience here, it can be a lot easier to contribute to the encyclopedia in terms of content related matters without the bit than it is with it. Particularly with some of the new school programs and the access to databanks. I just today saw that there is actually going to be a class program related to the religion field beginning next month. Finally. That content, frankly, has been a bloody mess for years, and having some help in it will be wonderful. And the list of other school projects is a lot longer than I had thought. An experienced editor aware of the system can ultimately do a lot in those projects, or, even, just looking at the articles we don't yet have and helping build them. | |||
*The discussion has moved on sufficiently to the point where I'm going to let it rest. I don't think RP is in any doubt that they could have handled this better and that understanding was mostly what I wanted to see. We all screw up but its concerning if you don't learn from it. Sorry to orange bar you unnecessarily. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 15:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Family issues can arise for everyone. Particularly if the family is close. And, honestly, this really is a particularly miserable time of year for anyone to bring anything to ArbCom. | |||
:: No problem ... didn't get a chance to reply earlier - sorry. Hopefully RP (and all of us) has learned (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 15:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Take off all the time for the holidays as you feel like. But I sincerely hope that you realize that in a lot of ways, particularly in directly content related matters, you can probably accomplish more without the bit than with it and having to do so many admin things. ] (]) 00:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
It's not a requirement. But, would you refrain from using your 'alternate' account, at the case? ] (]) 17:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Not sure why you're getting so worked up... == | |||
:Also, signing your replies as "the panda" may confuse editors not "in the know". Like me. ```]<small>]</small> 17:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Um, huh? My alternate account is for use when I'm not at home - because at home is the only secure place where I trust being logged into that admin account. When I am at work, or elsewhere, I log into my alternate account. I've already been accused of '''choosing''' to not participate in the case, are you therefore suggesting that I refrain from participating ''until I'm back at home''? That seems counterproductive and counterintuitive, now that I'm actually ''available'' with Misplaced Pages actually being ''accessible'' to me! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
... over Retrolord. As I said on the RfA page, Kudpung's posts are out of order. I'm sure I'll be chatting to him about them sooner or later, they're unfair and likely to make those who oppose an RfA feel badgered. Those people will then be more vehement in their opposes, cycling around to making the whole process more unpleasant. | |||
::TBH, I don't quite understand your reasoning. But, I'll just count that as a failing on my part & won't trouble you any further. ] (]) 14:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
*DP, regarding what and how to comment on the proposed decision my suggestion would be that you start a new level two section and comment on each of the proposals piece by piece (may a level 3 section each or however you want to format it) within that level two section. I'll put a discussion box around it so that there won't be threaded discussion within it and you can focus on the commenting on the decision then reply to others in a sub/another section. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 12:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
:* Hi DP, similar to Dusti, I hope you continue editing. In fact, I hope you regain your mop in due course. Your involvement with unblock requests will be missed. Kindest, ] (]) 07:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Happy Holidays! == | |||
What worries me is that you appear to be escalating the situation, talking about blocks, pointy behaviour and generally winding each other up. Might be a good idea to either work on diffusing things or stepping away. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 11:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: There's nothing on Kudpung's post that was any form of badgering, bullying, threats, improper, or anything - I believe you're rather falsely riling Retro up even further by suggesting that there is. Is it improper for ''anyone'' to suggest that someone re-read their !vote based on the discussion below it? Have you even read Kudpung's talkpage? Kudpung did nothing wrong whatsoever - he doesn't need any speaking to, and I think you've done Retro a disservice by suggesting that they were even remotely correct in their reading of the situation. You know I typically agree with most of your assessments, but you're way off on this one, and it will now lead to further drama (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 11:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Have you ever wanted to stand up and say something's wrong, in the face of massive support? It's a tough thing to do - and Kudpung's comments belittled his vote by stating that it was just there for disruption. He then went to the users talk page and implied that he should try again. There was no need - we don't need people to pass without opposes, we need a fair and open process. I'm following the situation as best I can, but for now I'm going to sit back for a bit and see if things improve, otherwise people will say things in haste which they may later regret. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 11:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Oh, and don't worry about calling me Dave - it's right there on my userpage, I don't mind. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 11:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::: Retro's !vote was based on neither policy, nor reality. It was based on opinion and false assumptions, and was indeed very weakly on that opinion. 3 or 4 other editors tried to discuss that opinion, in hopes that they would make a new decision. Yeah, oppose !votes that are based on false assumptions/pretenses are indeed disruptive (we've seen more than enough of those). Kudpung's comments were clearly not inappropriate, bullying, or even unfair. Retro's decision to generate drama rather than asking Kudpung to clarify was pure spite and cannot be defended by anyone. Retro's 3 later edits to the RFA were pure unadulterated ] that should, indeed, either be removed or lead to a block. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 11:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::Could you point me to anywhere that it says that RfA !votes have to be based on policy, reality or X's agreement? As far as I'm aware, you can place yourself on either side, and it's recommended you explain why. You don't have to be right. Others can refute your suppositions, and future readers take into account both your suppositions and those who refute them. It's a fine line moving from refuting to badgering - generally around the point that the same statement is being repeated. Implying that someone is only !voting in a certain manner to disrupt the process, that's not on. Retro's subsequent edits may well not have happened if he had been dealt with in a more sympathetic manner in the first place. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 11:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I think you're missing the point: Kudpung didn't say that Retro's !vote ''was'' disruptive - but that in general, non-reality based !votes, and ones that the !voter is not willing to revisit based on discussion have been shown to be one of the current problems across RFA over the recent years. He was encouraged to ''re-read'' the discussion and rethink his position - not forced to or bullied into action. In short, Retro WAS treated very sympathetically (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{ec}} :::::''I have'' stood up and said something's wrong. It's a tough thing to do - especially when you're an admin who deeply cares about the state of RfA. Retro's !vote was based on neither policy, nor reality. It was based on opinion and false assumptions, and was indeed very weakly on that opinion, but instead of replying on the RfA page and dramamongering, I took my thoughts to his talk page, and in a manner that was deliberately neither accusing, nor patronising, nor suggesting he change his vote. If anything, it was intended to help him reflect upon his further participation at RfA. I'm also not afraid to be active enough to take a heck of a lot of flak, most particulary of the totally unprovoked kind from editors who escape sanctions from ARBCOM on the premise of being good content contributors - that's why I have stayed out of such discussions although I bitterly wanted to say something and provide some diffs there. ] (]) 12:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Bwilkins, he said that "some oppose votes, are purely disruptive in an RfA that is so obviously going to succeed." - Given he the juxtaposition of that comment with his comment on Retro's page - it is a reasonable conclusion to draw that he was implying Retro's !vote was disruptive. If I were in Retro's shoes, I'd have read it the same way. | |||
::::::::Kudpung, it was more the comments on WT:RfA which I saw as problem. Not bullying mind you, just unfair. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 12:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{ec}} People are forgetting in the heat of the moment that there was one other oppose vote. I didn't directly mention it because there would be no point, would there? The history of how it got there is however unsurprising: , , and the comment, . Good thing I'm not an Arb... ] (]) 12:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Hi DP. I'm a newbie and just learning how to communicate with other Wikipedians. I just want to wish you a happy end-of-year holiday (if you observe it) and thank you for approving my request to reverse my erroneous block. May 2015 be your best year ever! ] (] 05:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
: And now he's edit-warring on ] - well done, giving him the ammo to believe he was right. It's now becoming his martyrdom. I expect you'll take care of it Dave? (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::And I wish you hadn't written that - it does make it look like I was goaded into this block - though I hadn't seen the comment. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 12:58, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: Sorry ... although you were goaded into the block, but not by me ... but by the blockee, unfortunately (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 16:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Seasonal Greets! == | |||
Bwilkins. Martyr for Kudpungiang justice. '''<font color="gold">★]</font>]]]<font color="gold">★</font>''' 05:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Consensus is that he did not bully you, so continuing to suggest otherwise - even in jest - is unbecoming. Oh, while you're here, have you had a chance to read ] - I've been waiting for your apology for mis-citing it at least a dozen times when it actually had zero relationship to the discussion at hand (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 08:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
== Mr. T's sig == | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello DangerousPanda, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. <br> | |||
Happy editing,<br> | |||
] (]) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
He is using a ], not a template in it. ] (]) 12:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:While posting in a ] — you comment not about the edit on which the ban hinges, but on a rather trifling matter, my signature, to apparently justify the ''ban''? What is your issue with ''me?'' If you are so ''disinterested'' why bother ''commenting'' at all? Besides, like the IP said, it's a ] and not a template per se.<p>P.S. Really, this is unhelpful, Wilkins, this is utterly and ''perfectly'' unhelpful! BTW I am not watching your page. ]] <span class="plainlinks"></span> 15:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
<small>Sent by ] (]) on behalf of {{U|{{Noping|Technical 13}}}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on ]</small> | |||
:: Did you even read my comment? I stated quite clearly that because you had begun to yell at people in bold letters, all caps, PLUS your willingness to completely act contrary to policy by having an invalid signature, you had more than used up any goodwill or sympathy of others. Because of that, '''almost nobody''' will listen to your sob stories and concerns because your own hands are nowhere clean enough. My issue with you is obviously that you whine, and want the rules to apply to others but not you ... and you are willing berate the volunteers on this project because you're not being listened to. Childish, to say the least. Whatever valid complaints you might have had have since disappeared into the blue yonder because of the way you've dealt with it. Well done. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 16:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Technical_13/Holiday_list&oldid=639096433 --> | |||
:::Don't you think you're taking this Signature thing a tad too far? What do you assume that I am doing it intentionally? <br>"''obviously that you whine, and want the rules to apply to others but not you''" - it is your opinion and I don't share that opinion. And I sense a tone of redundant condescension. You ''opine'' a lot. You're entitled to your opinion but I reserve the right to choose what to concur with. Good day, ]] <span class="plainlinks"></span> 09:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::: There's no condescending ... it's frustration that you have wholly wasted what might have been your sole opportunity by acting they way you have. When even I've given up on supporting your cause, you know you've fallen badly. "Madness is doing the same thing again and again, expecting a new result" (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 10:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::I am genuinely touched to see how much you're concerned about me. ]] 11:08, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== ] closed == | |||
== Ben Draiman article submission == | |||
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedy has been enacted: | |||
Hi Bwilkins, I apologise in advance if this is not the correct place to contact you as I am new to Misplaced Pages! | |||
I would just like to address my submission for the following page on Ben Draiman being declined: | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ben_Draiman | |||
{{ivmbox|1=1.1) For his violations of the standards of conduct expected of administrators, {{user|DangerousPanda}} is desysopped. He may regain the tools at any time via a successful ].}} | |||
I understand the comment in regard to Mr Draiman's brother and will edit accordingly. However, in regards to the local radio station play, he does indeed meet that criteria because he lives in Israel, thousands of miles from Canada. So not only did the radio station in question not play it because he was local, but because he wasn't anywhere near the same country. And being in the top 94 of the songs of 2011 is significant and fulfills at least one of the criteria mentioned. | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 08:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Among the sources which include the Jerusalem Post Article, the Article in the British Jewish Publication along with Altsounds, these are independent sources that give plenty of in-depth information about the musician, which fulfills yet another part of the criteria. Any advice you have on how I can progress with the article in light of these points would be appreciated.] (]) 22:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Yeah, let me know when I actually get to participate in said case. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 10:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Merry Christmas! ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 11:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Question for you == | |||
*Hi DangerousPanda, this is just to inform you that I have removed administrator status from your main account and from ] - the latter being in accordance with ]. Now that's out the way, I hope you've been having a decent holiday season and I do wish you the best. ] 12:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Hi there. I saw discussion about a blocked user, and saw that that user is commenting in it! I wondered if you in en.wiki allow blocked users to come to the ANI and defend themselves. I ask this only in order to become more familiar with the procedures and policies in here. Thanks.] (]) 18:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{archive-bottom}} | |||
: No, they did not comment themselves. They are permitted to post on their own talkpage - as such, they can create a section on their usertalkpage with the text they want copied from there to ANI, then add {{tl|helpme}} and request it be copied (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 18:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Wow, it is really awesome and helps all the voices to be heard. So while they are blocked, can they edit regarding other stuff rather than their appeal on their talk page?--] (]) 18:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: No. It's rather obvious that the ANI was about their block or their behaviour - thus, they're allowed to contribute. It's the only time editing-by-proxy is permitted (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 21:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::: Thanks.--] (]) 21:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
**Actually, in response to your rather obviously biased comment , I can honestly say, as someone who has been sympathetic to your situation, that the thing that virtually no one but you can consider legitimate are your rather transparent misrepresentations of fact regarding your own ability to edit and contribute to the discussion in an appropriate way at the appropriate time. Your comments, I regret to say, make it even harder for me to see anyone else ever necessarily trusting you in your statements of opinion again. Unfortunately. ] (]) 16:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Claim at ANI == | |||
::: (removed from inside archived area) {{replyto|John Carter}} I cannot fathom that lack of good faith. My family does not do laptops, tablets, etc. I'd scan hotel receipts, train tickets, etc, but that would violate my privacy even more. I did not control the time my in-laws spent here - but, as the man of the house, it was my job to keep them "entertained" as per cultural patriarchy. Since culturally they don't celebrate Christmas, I could not even install outdoor lights, decorate, etc until '''after''' they were gone, so I had t odo that after they left. I had to chauffeur them everywhere, and they wanted to see as much of the country that their daughter/sister had adopted (and Canada is, after all, a big country), plus a whackload of side trips. There was no humanly-possible way for me to be online. Hell, I got to play Farmville for the first time in ages on Christmas Eve (we don't do much Facebook usually, since most of the family don't even have internet yet!) <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::So you had no access to WP/chance to reply from the date the case opened (19th Nov) until it closed?! Yet you appear online about 2hrs after the verdict was given to complain about it. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 11:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::: You'll want to recheck your timings. When I became available, I immediately began the process of replying to evidence, etc. Clear proof of my intent to participate <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::''Intent'' being the key word there. You then played the absentia card. Maybe all the users who thought you were a good editor would have lept to your defence? Oh, wait... ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 10:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
* You had supported an indefinite block(when I was the subject), later on you had closed that report with a nice message and you had given me some tips. I still remember that encouragement. You were a very nice admin and your knowledge of policies was amazing. Hope you won't give up. ] (]) 07:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
I never really knew you, but as a fellow "abusive" ex-admin from another wiki, I'm all too familiar with what you're going through and I'm sorry it turned out the way it did. Best wishes for the future. ]] 09:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{archive-top|1=Just when one thinks that someone is improving as a person AND as an editor - WHAM! - they fuck it up badly (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 14:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
You claimed that "Fram has time and again levelled unsubstantiated claims at/about Jimbo on his talkpage." Ironically, that is a totally unsubstantiated claim. Could you provide some evidence of where I have done such things? Thanks! ] (]) 11:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Are you denying that you pushed Jimbo to the point that he specifically requested that you not post on his talkpage? (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 11:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*Hey DP. I have mixed feelings about the decision. It was kind of inevitable, which makes the case look like a show trial. I'm sure the arbs were well-intentioned, but I don't think there was any realistic prospect of it going any other way. I don't think you were the terrible admin you were made out to be by some parties, but admins are vulnerable because the good work goes mostly unnoticed. You made a few bad judgements, and you didn't always handle things as well as you could have, so it's hard to disagree with the ultimate result but it is a shame, and I hope you'll stick around and continue to do good work without the bit. I'm available if you need an admin for something. A belated merry Christmas and happy new year. ] | ] 17:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::I'm denying that I levelled any unsubstantiated claims. I levelled ''substantiated'' claims, which he didn't like, and for which he tried to get rid of me. This current "outing" situation is a typical example, the "will.i.am" situation before it was similar, his incorrect copyvio deletions (and some COI deletions) were yet another, his actions on Commons (which I think are the origin of this dispute) yet another. There may have been more, but I don't think any were unsubstantiated. ] (]) 11:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*Hi DP, I'm sorry to see that was how it went. ArbCom is a big black box to me, but for what little it's worth, I'm shocked and saddened. ] (]) 20:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::: I'd politely suggest you've provided a mix of both substantiated ''and'' then went too far with both lesser but unsubstantiated claims ''and'' inappropriate "pushing" of both, including ascribing intent to them which ''was'' unsubstantiated (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*DP, {{U|HJ Mitchell|Harry}} has hit the nail on the head and I echo all his thoughts entirely. Arbs are generally a good bunch and, if anything, they are often too lenient. When an admin gets called to book however, it's a different ball game and the Committee is under enormous pressure to demonstrate that justice will be done. It's a shame you just happened to be that scapegoat. Take care, --] (]) 23:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::Can you provide some examples of the latter (i.e. the things following the first ''and'' in your post)? It may have happened, and it then perhaps shouldn't have happened, but it's hard to learn from your mistakes when you're not aware what those mistakes are. I usually try not to ascribe intent and to stick to the facts, but it's often tempting and natural to discuss intent as well, e.g. when people consistenly avoid answering a question or "miss" the point. ] (]) 12:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
::::: Out of respect for you, I'm not going to go and do that digging right now. I actually appreciate that you appear to have "come clean" above, and I actually think that beginning to recognize that one's own behaviour ''may'' have built some pretty big walls is huge. I also don't want to do that digging because I greatly fear that doing so would actually ''lead'' to reasons to block you - again, something I'd rather not do. | |||
::::: I am serious, however about one thing I said it ANI: if you post on Jimbo's talkpage again, I will personally block you. As an admin, you know that you're supposed to protect editors from harassment - and in this specific situation Jimbo is an editor first, and has more than once requested that you stop. In some ways, you need to do a 1-way voluntary interaction ban. | |||
::::: Do you want to get back on Jimbo's good side? Revert some vandalism to his userpage every so often. Maybe agree with him every now and then during discussions ''not on his talkpage''. Don't attack or cast apsersion on his intent ''anywhere''. Show that you're willing to defend yourself ''gently'' instead of ''aggressively''. | |||
::::: Someday, if Jimbo (and others in the community, BTW) see that you've changed for the better, then everyone will get along better. I ''do'' understand that you're very passionate about some things - that's good. It's how you express your passion - and how you respond when someone says something contrary to your position on a passionate topic that is actually what is defining you as a ''bad person'' over the last while. There is a middle ground, but only YOU can reach it. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 13:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <small><span style="text-shadow:4px 4px 15px #00F,-4px -4px 15px #49F;">]</span> • <span style="text-shadow:4px 4px 15px #F80,-4px -4px 15px #F08;">]</span></small> 15:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
I ''have'' reverted vandalism there, often even. I have blocked vandals and protected his pages when needed. I have started ] about a persistent sock on his user talk page, and have since reverted and blocked further socks. I have also participated in discussions about subjects I had a direct relationship with, like ; if Jimbo wants to use his page as a public discussion forum of general interest (instead of as his user talk page), then he shouldn't try to unilaterally ban some people from it. He isn't an editor first, he promotes his page as the place to be, the oasis of the Founder where normal policies (like forumshopping and canvassing) don't apply; he can't have it both ways. | |||
== Re creating page == | |||
I'll try to restrict myself to topics which either are directly relevant to me (like the Rich Farmbrough discussions), or where he is making a serious policy error (like in the Snowden discussion). I'll stay away from discussions of a more general or less problematic nature. And I'll continue to monitor for vandalism and "real" trolling (despite Jimbo's claims, none of my posts on his page were disingenious or trolling; they were not to his liking, they may sometimes have been rude in response to his attacks, they may have occasionally been wrong, but that doesn't make them disingenious or trolling). But that doesn't give you the right to simply block me if you don't even want to provide evidence of my previous "unsubstantiated allegations". Note that this now means that ''you'' have made a personal attack against me. If you don't want to back it up out of some attempt to protect me from myself, then you shouldn't make the accusation in the first place, or strike it. If my allegations on Jimbo's talk page are substantiated and usually correct, then there is no reason to block me (or even to warn me) for making unsubstantiated allegations; although perhaps then it may be time to take a look at Jimbo Wales' use of his admin tools and general editing. ] (]) 13:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Wow. You've gone from earning my respect to being confrontational and losing it in a whopping 15 minutes. Once again, Jimbo has requested you stay off his talkpage - '''period'''. Now that you're becoming belligerant on mine, I'll request the same from you on this talkpage. The difference is this: '''I''' will block you for posting on Jimbo's, seeing as he asked you not to post there. Someone else will have to block you on mine, because <insert deity name here> knows that I'd hate for ] to be invoked. And here I thought you had made some progress. Sucks to be wrong (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 13:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{archive-bottom}} | |||
I am musician from india,kerala.I created my wikipedia page years back.that deleted.Why it deleted ? i need to re create it now.what should i do ? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== RE: LordZebedee == | |||
:I'd ] and re-create it. DPanda doesn't come around much now, he's busy washing his ]. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
I hope that this time they discuss the changes. If they just revert then I will fully support an indef. If that doesn't force them to communicate then nothing will. ] (]) 10:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Due to your ] you should NOT create or directly edit any article or content about yourself. If you think that you meet ], you can ] -- ] 19:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
: Next time, don't simply post under the closed incident at ANI - open a new one and refer to the old one (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 10:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Will do. Thanks! I guess it's not one for AIV huh? ] (]) 10:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: No. Edit-warring is for ] (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 11:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Stub barnstar userbox == | |||
== sorry for the confusing discussion == | |||
Hi DangerousPanda. I very much appreciate the ]. You're only missing one that I want to display; the Stub Barnstar. Any chance you can make that one? I'd be happy to provide a review of something or help you with some project in return for making it. Let me know. Cheers. ] (]) 11:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
: Please do not delete the actionned/responded to request - it will be archived as a record. Thanks. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 20:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:" rmv boneheaded cluelessness" you were clearly looking in the mirror when you called me that. ] ] 23:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Sorry == | ||
Montreal, Mar 15. 2015 | |||
Hi Bwilkins. I have raised a request at ] concerning ]'s user page and talk page. I'm not sure if a block also prevents a user from responding at AN, but we may have to consider an unblock to allow him to respond there. In my opinion, this should be done under the strict proviso that he comments there, and only there, and does not edit anywhere else in any namespaces on Misplaced Pages. Note that I will be away from my office without Internet for at least another 12 hours.Regards, ] (]) 00:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Hi | |||
== Block == | |||
I'm sorry I never apologized for my off-the-cuff remarks a few years back when the page i tried to make for Joaquin Lievano was taken down. | |||
Hey BWilkins, I was wondering if you'd be willing to discuss and/or reconsider your block of PumpkinSky. I know I'm not one for civility-type blocks and tensions are high between you two, but I don't think a block was the appropriate course of action there, especially since it's escalated the situation. I also figured that in the name of de-escalation, coming here instead of going straight to drama central would be the right thing to do, though I do think that if there continues to be substantial conflict over this block, a community review might be helpful. Just my 2 cents. Best, ]|<sup>]</sup> 01:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''support''' .. sorry BMW, but I'm with Keilana on this one. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 01:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*That was the 2nd block that came from that thread. It seems to be a poisonous block pit today. ] | ] | ] | ] 01:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*Bwilkins, please consider undoing the block. Whether PumpkinSky deserved a block or not, you should definitely not have been the one to make it (nor the one to protect the page, for that matter), as you were involved in the edit war. ] ]] 03:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
I'm doing so now. | |||
] | |||
Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Cheers | |||
*In accordance with the growing consensus in that ANI thread, and on the assumption that you're away from the computer and thus unavailable to respond to the concerns about ], I've unblocked PumpkinSky. ] ]] 05:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Nick (Nicholas Robinson, a.k.a. tonbo0422) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:: Interesting - accusations of involved, and an accusation that this was a "civility block" because there was some non-existent "high tensions" between PS and I? Wow ... that's extending something well beyond belief. Some folks really didn't read the entire chain of events, and certainly don't AGF much (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 10:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Bwilkins, as a fellow non-enemy of the lulz, fellow owner of an inexpensive automobile, and fellow loyal subject of ], I think you might just over-stepped a little bit in this particular matter. Pete aka --] (]) 11:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::: Perhaps I'm not explaining the entire sequence of events properly, or there's a poisoned well somewhere because I had the nerve to be offline and a lot of unfounded, non-AGF accusations happened while I was drinking Coronas and sleeping, but this is bizarre. I ''know'' ] very very well. Just because someone ''claims'' I'm involved - and manufactures things like "you're mad because I took your friend to ArbComm" (which is the most bizarre claim about me I have ever seen on Misplaced Pages) doesn't make me involved - that was a pointy stunt in and of itself, and simply goes to prove that I made the right call on the block (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 11:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
*Not that it matters, but I wouldn't have blocked PumpkinSky (big shocker, I know....) but under no circumstance do I see anything that could be seen as admin abuse. I accept that we have different thresholds and prefer to spend my time persuading admin to raise their threshold instead of demonizing them in cases like this where it seems the block was in good faith. Yesterday was a day of drama, perhaps we can work to make today different. ] | ] | ] | ] 12:11, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
* Yes, we'll need to move forward - although perhaps ] would be so kind as to ''correct'' his unblock statement about ] ... oh wait, that cannot be easily done. Good idea not to make such unfounded block log statements in the first place as we move forward (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
**I would agree that I don't see how WP:involved played a role. There is entirely too much drama going on and admin are getting caught up in it. Admin are getting trigger happy on both sides of many issues (not just this), and what we need now is some calm reflection, not more drama and debates. ] | ] | ] | ] 12:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
**I wouldn't correct it even if I could. With respect to Dennis and yourself (the real kind, not the ] kind), I stand by my statement that this was an involved action, and I for my part am surprised that you and Dennis can't see where we're coming from. You edit-warred with PumpkinSky on the talk page and then protected the page to end the war on your revision and terms: that is ''never'' cool. I can accept that you did that in good faith to try to avoid needing a block, rather than explicitly to end the edit war in your favor, but that does ''not'' make it uninvolved, nor does it make it even remotely good idea. When you removed PS's comment a ''second'' time, your actions became edit-warring whether you meant them to be or not, and I'm surprised you can't see that. Well, you ''can'' see that, because you told him to stop edit warring. So how is your re-reversion of someone whom you consider to be edit warring not in itself further edit-warring? And then you go and block PS based at least in part for the edit war, the one that you participated in. (Yes, I'm aware there are other things that happened in between, but it doesn't really matter: you cited the edit war in your block rationale, and even if you hadn't, the edit war without any other context should bve enough to raise a red flag.) I don't think you did this maliciously or to protect your friends from their enemies or whatever. I'm perfectly willing to accept that you blocked in good faith, and that you believed that you weren't involved. But that don't make it so, Joe: it looks to me, and to others in the ANI thread, that you edit-warred with a user and then blocked them for it. And even if you wouldn't have been involved, surely you could've at least thought about avoiding the appearance of INVOLVED and left it for someone else. You're welcome to disagree, of course, but I'd be a little troubled if you can't at least see where we're coming from on this. ] ]] 13:13, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
***Because his reverts were done in an administrative capacity, not an editorial one, that would not be covered by Involved. I guess it depends on what you think his intent was in doing the reverting. If you think it was editorial only, then you might see it as involved. I didn't see it that way. I disagreed with the block, but for different reasons. ] | ] | ] | ] 13:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:: Oh bullmalarky ]. Now, if I had actually been ''involved'' in the discussion that was being edit-warred over I would 100% agree that I was involved. However, from ]: ''"an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area purely in an administrative role, or whose prior involvements are minor or obvious edits which do not speak to bias, is not involved and is not prevented from acting in an administrative capacity in relation to that editor or topic area"''. If I was watching ANY article because of potential problems (maybe someone raised our attention at ANI) and an IP editor added something inappropriate, I'm quite welcome to remove it, and remove it again, and block if needed - that would be 100% appropriate and acceptable. What's the difference here, other than the fact that some of PS's pointiness happened on my talkpage - nothing. The trail of PS's anger spread across Misplaced Pages yesterday, and his disruption was apparent to anyone who reviewed any of the edits. It was just odd that it was the edit-warring on a closed thread that actually brought anyone's attention to it. The original choice was to block for much longer per ], and based on the concept of escalating blocks (I would have only looked at the ''real'' ones). Stopping PS from shooting themself in the foot any further is and was the sole goal, and there's no possible definition of the ] policy that you can link my actions to, period - perhaps you haven't reviewed their edits from yesterday, and have merely drank from the poisoned well that was ANI? (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 13:32, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::It takes two to do the edit-war tango. You don't get a free pass because you can say "hey, this is an admin action". A thread was closed, and PS was questioning the close. On what grounds is a questioning of a thread's close eligible for admin action? ] ]] 13:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::Closing is an administrative function, it just doesn't take someone with the admin bit to do it. I'm not going to argue, I will just say that I don't see that as involved and I have to respectfully disagree with that aspect. It isn't personal, but to me, "involved" means having some kind of editorial preference in the content of the words that are being "edit warred" over, which I didn't see. I still wouldn't have blocked, but WP:involved had nothing to do with why. ] | ] | ] | ] 14:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::I understand that closing is an administrative action, but that's not particularly relevant, because that's not what Bwilkins did. Bwilkins is saying that reverting someone who was questioning the close is also an administrative action, and I very much disagree, particularly when the edit summaries were "don't edit long-closed threads" (it was only closed for two hours; not long by any measure) and "stop edit-warring" (the edit summary of a further reversion is the absolute worst place to say such a thing). ] ]] 14:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::: ], what the fuck are you talking about? I quite CLEARLY stated that that "reverting someone who was questioning the close" is NOT an administrative action. Where the hell do you read anything remotely related to what you're claiming I said? I quite clearly stated that obtaining consensus to re-open the discussion was completely acceptable - but that sneaking your comments inside the archive was the problem. Holy fucking hell. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 17:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::I was talking to Dennis, who had said further up the page: "{{tq|Because his reverts were done in an administrative capacity, not an editorial one, that would not be covered by Involved.}}" Seriously, chill out: I'm not impugning your character or saying that you're a horrible person or even that you knowingly misused tools. I'm not building an arb case behind your back or anything of the sort. It's just that you just made, in my estimation, a poor call, and I wanted to explain why I thought it was poor. It happens to everyone. ] ]] 18:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::: Actually, your unblock log ''still'' impugns my character - and you're still claiming (based on all the evidence) that I was involved - so yeah, still impugning. If I made a poor call, it was ''not'' based on being involved. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 18:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::: Oh yeah, ], your notification on PS's page ''still'' says it's because I was "involved" - and you've seen the BS that incorrect statement has caused today. So, go clean up your shit, please - as those things (written by ''you'') are indeed impugning my character (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 19:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== |
== ] == | ||
Hey, remember that ] for {{user5|Jimmy McDaniels}}? He's back as {{user5|104.12.136.213}} and violating the ban. ] (]) 02:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
You may want to look at this discussion here: ] ] ] 11:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Humourous. Thank you - I needed that. You clearly have zero understanding of what actually happened last night. There was also no such consensus at ANI. Biiiggggg stretch to go from what REALLY happened to accusations of admin impropriety. Your little accusation that Jmh is my friend will be the part that bites you in the ass on this one, as it's proof that ''your'' incorrect assumptions led, in part, to your actions. Good luck though. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 11:52, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::And your response shows you have zero understanding of the error of your ways. Thanks for proving that there are serious issues with today's admins corps. ] ] | |||
::: I'm always first in line to admit to my errors when I make them. Based on the FACTS in this case, I clearly did not make an error in this situation, and your ] are merely serving to prove me right. Thanks for that. Now, since you're willing to stop flogging the equine, I'll ask you to not revisit this talkpage until you've taken at least 2 weeks to review my statements, your personal assumptions, and of course you'll want to thank me for saving your ass from what was likely going to be a much longer block by some other admin. Until you reach that point, do not return here. Cheers (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== |
== ] == | ||
I have added you to this page since you haven't edited for a few months. If you ever return, remove your name from the list. ] (] / ]) 18:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Crimson Alberta Ferretti dress of Uma Thurman == | |||
Was disappointed by your decline request & to be honest was '''very offended''' by the uncivil editor remark. I have tried to maintain as much civility as possible with other editors. 1 guy gets on my nerves & both of us shoot off at each other. If you look at the other editor Abhishek191288,he has been having several uncivilized conversations with several others, has also engaged in edit warring, '''has admitted to it''' but gets away with a pep talk. | |||
Please userfy the talk page. I have added an additional three sources as of 2013 consensus has changed and these dress are notable per ]. Is it okay for me to restore without discussion given these changes or do you prefer DRV? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 21:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
He has even refused to accept to '''Government of India notification''' as a reliable source of information. Take a look at Surat Railway station & Mumbai Rajdhani page main images. For sometime the exact same image was posted there & despite explaining in detail why the particular image was incorrect, he still refuses to accept it. What do you suggest i do with such a person because talking to him is of no use or there is a way to explain how the '''Great Eastern royale''' building (in the background)in Tardeo area of Mumbai got transported to Surat ?? Perhaps there is a way to explain how Mumbai Central & Surat railway station have identical layouts. Problem is i cant explain it & it is pointless asking someone who's ego is offended by superior work. If as he claims they are irrelevant then why '''except him''' is no one removing them. | |||
== Invitation == | |||
He has been targeting my uploads but it puzzles me that when i undo them, i get blocked, he does it he gets a pep talk. Can you please explain it to me because i cant see any reason for it. As far as ownership of articles is concerned,i have long accepted that '''anyone from anywhere''' can edit anything but that is supposed to be based on '''facts not opinions'''. Besides i have made several offers to him to upload his work so that a impartial analysis of both our works can be done. I have yet to see a single upload in that direction but what i do see on his page is undone edits of various other people. | |||
{| style="margin:0px; font-family:Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica" width="90%" | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:15px 15px 15px 15px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">I'd like to invite you to join the ]. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards ] (]) 19:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)</div> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== Wikipedians by degree == | |||
Fact in this case is that a building in Mumbai cannot be used to depict Surat,opinion is that lets revert the edit because i don't like the other person & he is uploading more images than me especially since i cant match him for quality & quantity. There is a small quote from a John Grisham novel If a witness is unshakeable on facts then beat him up with insignificant details which is exactly the case here. This is completely unacceptable. Help me understand why facts are superseding opinions here. | |||
Hi, ] is a container cat (subcats only). Please consider a more specific subcat if you wish to categorize ]. Thanks, ] (]) 18:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Had left a message for you on my talk page on 8th June. I do understand that that is not what you prefer but considering that i was not permitted to edit your talk page,it was the best that i could do. I have tried to be civil with everyone but i am only human. | |||
==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
] (]) 13:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
] ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 12:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
==Belated thanks== | |||
:You may have a point, but can you comment on whether you have also edited as ]? '''''] ]<small><FONT COLOR="#313F33"> and the soapdish</FONT></small>''''' 15:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Hi, | |||
I know it is late, but I never thanked you for your support on the aftermath of ] and | |||
]. ] (]) 14:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== suggestion: == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Perhaps you and I could have a talk .. maybe email or something so as to not raise the drama levels on wiki. is very discouraging BMW. If you honestly don't understand the "why" .. I will try to explain. I have a TON of respect for you. If you remember, I did support your first RfA .. and truly admired your work at WQA. But I've been watching some things that honestly sadden me. Could we talk please? yes/no/maybe? — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 21:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692009577 --> | |||
: Ched, you know you're always welcome to e-mail me ... I do trust/respect you (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 21:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
:: Thanks BW. I'll drop you a line tomorrow. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 00:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== |
== ] == | ||
Hi, | |||
Bruskom(User) is making vandalism on the article. Greater Armenia and Turkish Kurdistan shares same area historically. I dont know the aim of the users but this users doesn't want to be known this information. Also Encyclopædia Britannica informations are always removed by this users without any reason. Please, stop the vandalizm ] (]) 00:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
* Greater Armenia - https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=greater+armenia&biw=1920&bih=947&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio986KyNLJAhVBWxQKHQgxC0MQ_AUIBigB#imgrc=-cBSdyVTYxbs8M%3A | |||
Hey Bwilkins, responding to "Not sure why you're removing an image" , the image is identical to the profile picture higher up on the page, my feeling was that the same image is not needed twice - do you disagree? Thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
* Kurdistan - https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=greater+armenia&biw=1920&bih=947&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio986KyNLJAhVBWxQKHQgxC0MQ_AUIBigB#tbm=isch&q=cia+kurdistan&imgrc=gSas0O3Q96I2hM%3A | |||
: So, why didn't you put that in your edit-summary? Or perhaps a note on the article talkpage that we needed a different images since it was duplicated? (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 14:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Greyhound-Syfa listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Greyhound-Syfa'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 09:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Official page / website == | |||
== Please do not abuse your admin authority == | |||
You have messaged me about the changes I made to some pages as official pages / website of some indian celebrities with the reason "I didn't edit links nor is it my website. The website belongs to Shammi Kapoor who heads the kapoor family. The added links were back to his site which represents the entire family site. The links were added on the pages of the family members of the website." | |||
{{archive-top|1=I'm always pleased to be provided an opportunity to reflect. However, unwarranted attacks, out-of-context bullshit, and your complete and utter unwillingness to recognize that the steps you're asking for WERE done ages ago show that you're either clueless, have an axe to grind, or are simply trying to work me up. I don't rise to such baiting today, thank you very much (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
Bwilkins, I'm sure you are a fine admin and work hard to improve and protect the project, but earlier today you at if I posted any additonal comments. I feel that was highly inappropriate and an abuse of your authority. In the future, I suggest you stop attempting to censor editors through basless and unwarranted threats like that. <P> I also would ask you to read the wise words of some of your great admin colleagues, like , , and , regarding the ANI situation. <P> Your apparent attempt to smear admin OrangeMike's reputation by bringing up past allegations against him, which have absolutely no relevance to the current matter, was highly improper. The fact remains that ANI has a basic, primary instruction: "Before posting a grievance about a user here, please discuss the issue with them on their user talk page." Just today, another fine admin, Kim Dent-Brown, made the importance of that instruction clear, when he said in another thread, "the original complainant was wrong to come straight here without addressing the IP editor first". Bbb23 said, "Demiurge should have discussed the current problem with Mike before coming here. Just because he has discussed what he believes to be a pattern doesn't justify not giving Mike a first opportunity to reply." But perhaps Bushranger put it best in our ANI discussion when he said, "regardless of whether or not the block was valid, regardless of past communications (or lack thereof), and regardless of any biting, the fact that there was no communication with OM before he got dragged here is very disturbing". So while you won't accept this point from an IP like me, perhaps will you will listen to some of your highly-respected admin colleagues. <P> Regarding the overall ANI topic, it involves a user who is a paid employee/contractor of the subject of an article; one who has admitted to creating a shared account for the sole purpose of using the article as a promotional tool. Any editor or admin who ignores or downplays policies like WP:NOPAY, WP:NOSHARE, and WP:NPOV are being disruptive - whether intentional or not - with regard to our duty to protect the project and its integrity. <P> In any case, I hope in the future you will never again threaten a productive, good-faith user with a block for merely participating in a discussion, unless that editor is clearly trolling or blatantly violating another policy. And falsely describing a comment like as "trolling", as you did , solely to create an excuse to block someone, is, as I said, an abuse of your authority as an admin. And falsely alleging trolling can also be seen as a form of harassment. If you thought perhaps I was repeating myself too much, which I admit I sometimes am guilty of, then it certainly would've been fine to ask me to please stop doing that. However, if another editor comments to me directly regarding a past comment, then I certainly have every right to respond. But trying to completely shut out an editor from a conversation, by holding a block over their head, is on the verge of being outrageous. Fortunately, another admin (Bbb23), told you that your threat to block me was improper. --] (]) 06:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: I have never abused my admin authority, and your accusations are ridiculous. No - I was not told the block was ''improper'', it was their ''opinion'' that it was perhaps not the best way forward. Nobody should have to ask you TWICE to stop being disruptive in that thread. Any intelligent editor who chooses to do about a minute of research would know that I take promotional accounts and username very seriously, and deal with them every day. The wise editor would have already figured out that I was the one who created the {{tl|coiq}} template, and that I deal with a half-dozen unblock requests from spam accounts every day. Before YOU drop by to make bizarre accusations, please do your homework. Your lack of doing your background work, and utter AGF in your accusations are what's disturbing. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 09:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::"Any intelligent editor"? Very mature. It's interesting how you believe that an editor is somehow supposed to figure out in "a minute" what your philosophy is on some random aspect of editing? Right. But it's moot anyway because my comments are based on your comments and conduct in that discussion. And for the record, what Bbb said in response to your threat was, "The IP should not be blocked for his conduct here". I'm not sure how he could have been any more clear and concise with you than that. And this issue is not about your mischaracterization of my comments being "disruptive"; it's about you threatening a block if I posted ''anything'' else in the discussion. Defending that outrageous threat makes me question your judgment. I would've understood and respected you if you at least said something like... you're right, I should've just asked you not to keep repeating things, or not (whatever you think was "disruptive"). But to simply say... don't post ''anything'' again or I'll block you immediately was, frankly, total bullshit. And if you had done it, it would've been overturned in a hearteat anyway. Anyway, you didn't address the overall comments of Bbb, DGG and Bushranger, but that's okay. You got the message. And I'm sure you've read their comments. Hopefully, you'll learn something from them. In any case, that ANI report turned out to be a complete waste of time, as predicted when it was started. Btw, you're one of the last people who should be lecturing others about AGF. I've seen more than a few comments about your ongoing failure with AGF. --] (]) 10:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: Ooohhh...pull a whole bunch of comments completely out of their original context and accuse me of not AGF? Very pathetic - a weak attack where no position of reality exists. Go away until you're a) able to read properly, and b) ready to increase your AGF-factor. You've just proven EXACTLY why I was right on ANI. Congratulations. (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 12:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{archive-bottom}} | |||
I have authentication letters from all the four celebrities who have assignment me as their technical person to handle their websites and social media. I need to make this immediate changes as soon as possible. Please revert of how to do it and how can I send you those authorisation letters on a non-public forum. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== MrT == | |||
== Official page / website == | |||
I have just unlocked MrT's talk page to see whether we are able to move forward at all. I have still locked him out of email until its clear that he won't abuse it again. I'm minded that a longer block than the original 3 day is required as a consequence of the nastygrams and, as the other known recipient, I'd be interested to know how long you think is appropriate. Thanks ] <sup>'']''</sup> 07:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: I think, based on the contents of the e-mail I received alone, that this should sadly be indef. I think he's trying to do right, but he certainly has a fecked-up way of reacting to things (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 09:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I can't argue with that. I have closed out the discussion and directed MrT to BASC or UTRS. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 11:03, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
The links I have edited are official sites even if they dont appear to be. i have authentication from the artists with the permission to make these changes and represent their social media. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== AN notice == | |||
== Official page / website == | |||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice-->--] (]) 17:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Oh thank you; there is a deity and they reside within Bbb23 (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 17:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
The links I have edited are official sites even if they dont appear to be. i have authentication from the artists with the permission to make these changes and represent their social media. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Always == | |||
:{{u|Thefinalmiracle}}, DangerousPanda left Misplaced Pages two years ago. Could I be of any help to you? ]] 15:40, 20 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Bots Newsletter, April 2017 == | |||
Your statement that "'bits' always means genitals" is wrong. A ] contains 8 bits. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 14:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Byte me? ] <small>(])</small> 14:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
{|style="background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" | |||
:Are you saying that TRM has bytes? I for one didn't know that "bits" can mean genitals (is that a British thing?), but you have to admit, Kiefer, that you delight in double entendre, whether it was intended in this case or not.--] (]) 14:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', April 2017 | |||
|- | |||
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | ] | |||
Greetings! | |||
== Sorry == | |||
The ''BAG Newsletter'' is now the ''Bots Newsletter'', per ]. As such, we've subscribed all ] to the newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from ]. | |||
Logging back in just to say this "officially", not as an IP address: I retract the WP:DICK comments at Jimbotalk. I was severely irritated and seem to have misread your intent, which appeared to me to be directly questioning my and someone else's motives or honesty, but which I now see can be read differently; you are right that I did not assume good faith; ''mea culpa''. While I did honestly meant a certain amount of parting incivility to people gravedancing about my leaving and the reasons for it, I don't think you were an appropriate target for that. Peace. I have nothing to say to anyone else at this point. Actually I guess I should clarify that I never said that a resigning Arb {{em|claimed specifically}} that he quit because of SarekOfVulcan; I was alluding to an Arb (I couldn't be bothered to go look up his name right now; I have more rewarding things to do like pet one of the cats and have a snack, and make a checklist for an upcoming trip to Europe, and {{em|anything else}} but Pickyweedia) who resigned in disgust, with a pointed statement about ArbCom doing what it collectively thought would cause fewer waves rather than what was right, and this resignation happening shortly on the heels of SoV getting away with blatant entrapment schemes and somehow escaping being desysoped by ArbCom for it. One can theorize that the timing was just coincidence of course. I really don't care any more. — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ<sup><big>⊝</big></sup>כ<sup>⊙</sup>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 09:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
: I will express my sincere thanks to you for this. I would also encourage you to take some time to recharge - then come back. There's a lot of BS on this site (try being an admin!) and if you let a bunch of little things OR a couple of big things annoy you too much, you get away from the real intent of what we all are trying to do here. Whether you leave permanently or come back in 6 months...a year...whenever, you'll still have my respect for a) the things you have tried to do for the project, and b) your apology above. Cheers (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 10:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Highlights for this newsletter include: | |||
== Meta areas == | |||
;Arbcom | |||
] has closed. The ] include: | |||
*''Community encouraged to review common fixes'' | |||
*''Community encouraged to review policy on cosmetic edits'' | |||
*''Developers encouraged to improve AWB interface'' | |||
*''Bot approvals group encouraged to carefully review BRFA scope'' | |||
*''Reminders/Restrictions specific to Magioladitis'' | |||
;BRFAs | |||
, but as I've been ], there's not much I can say, other than it's clearly a case of a young user trying to be clever and get noticed. However, RfA is a free-for-all venue for drama and nobody can be disenfranchised except for the most serious of reasons. ] (]) 23:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
We currently have 27 ] bot requests at ], and could use your help processing! | |||
: I think it's been worked out ... both by e-mail, ''and'' on his talkpage. They are certainly an impulsive individual with a thin skin, and an inability to easily see where/when they've caused an issue. Let's hope the dozens of eyes can lead him somewhere (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 13:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
;Discussions | |||
== Still waiting == | |||
There are multiple ongoing discussions surrounding bot-related matters. In particular: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*A phabricator ticket {{phab|T162685}} has been made to have a "bots" tag, so issues related to bot frameworks can be tracked | |||
;New things | |||
Bwilkins, | |||
Several new things are around: | |||
*A BAG Guide has been created (], ]). | |||
*Users now have the option to hide AWB from their watchlists via a script (], ]) | |||
*The guidance on how to deal with bot issues has been overhauled (], ]) | |||
*The bot policy has been updated to clarify that bot operators are required to register accounts. (], ]) | |||
;Wikimania | |||
is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, ]! | |||
Thank you! <small>edited by:<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">]</span> 11:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)</small> | |||
---- | |||
<small>(You can unsubscribe from future newsletters by removing your name from ].)</small> | |||
|} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Bots/Spam&oldid=775057344 --> | |||
Since you've been inactive since 2014, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 23:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 17:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi, In 2012 you tried to help me understand how Misplaced Pages works when I wanted to add a page for someone I felt was misrepresented in the Misplaced Pages pages. I've been away due to illness for sometime, but coming back I still wasn't clear. I have reviewed the notes you made for me at that time and also have had support from the WP community. I am going to keep adding pages when I can now, as am working with people who need the help (COI clearly declared!). I just wanted to say thank you for your patience and to let you know I appreciated the time you took to try to explain. I have only created one article so far, and it has needed help but the next one I have a better understanding I think, even though I think I may have moved it not reading the words tools for reviewers:) So sorry about that. But thanks again for your help. ] (]) 21:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== About ] == | |||
How was there consensus for deletion? There was: | |||
* 6 keeps, 4 of which were strong | |||
* 6 deletes, 0 of which were strong | |||
* 1 rename, 1 of which was strong | |||
* 1 comment, 0 of which were strong | |||
It seems like the page shouldn't have been deleted, due to no consensus. | |||
By the way, I would support keeping it but renaming it to 2012–13 North American winter. ] I have no ideas for what to put here. ] 18:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|The Nth User}} I hope you do realize that 1) the deletion discussion was closed about 5 years ago, and contesting the deletion is pretty much useless at this point, and 2) Dangerous Panda hasn't edited Misplaced Pages since 2014. ]] 23:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Unblock an == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 19:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] and ] == | |||
Hello. | |||
Can you help as I ask for reconsideration of the recreation of two previous deleted articles, that two players now play in the Paraguay División Intermedia, so as to be fully professional sports league on Wiki. | |||
Respectfully. ] (]) 18:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Rojodiablcerrocerrocerro}}, Dangerous Panda has not edited Misplaced Pages in over 5 years. You may want to create the articles in Draft space - ] and ] and go through the ] process, especially given one of them was deleted after a discussion. <b>]</b> (]) 20:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
| title = Awesome | |||
| image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| bold = ] | |||
}} | |||
--] (]) 05:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
I am still waiting for your answer. Would appreciate it if you could spare a few minutes. | |||
] (]) 03:59, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
: An answer to what, where? (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 10:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
== I read your statement == | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ]]] 02:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Draft: Vaibhav Maloo == | |||
''Revenge? No. You were not venting, you were abusive. I'm a volunteer here - as are you. If you were a volunteer at the Boy Scouts and you pulled another volunteer into another room and swore at them, called them disgusting names, abused them, and verbally attacked them you would not be a volunteer there anymore. In fact, if you did that to me in person, I'd be laying charges against you - and I would win. Your actions were unwarranted, and you seem to think that they should be instantly forgiven ... even though you're not asking for forgiveness. On what planet do you believe such vitriol is appropriate? This project is an electronic workspace - the same rules for the real world apply here'' | |||
Hello, do take a look at the notability factor now, of this page, a lot has changed. Thanks. You have protected this page. ] — ] | |||
I read this statement of yours. I can't think of anything appropriate to say at this time. I saw you were trying to be helpful in the mess Mr T was in. ] (]) 12:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:{{tps}} {{yo|Nuttyprofessor2016}} I don't have context for what you are asking, but I'm pretty sure you won't be getting a response from him. He's been off Misplaced Pages for 7 or 8 years. ] <small>(])</small> 01:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
: I cannot tell whether ]'re in agreement with the comment, shocked by the comment, or trashing me for the comment ... ] (]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">]</span>]) 13:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Though all of us are volunteers of unknown expertise, we all imagine that we are all involved in a serious business - I believe that we should be as formal and civil as possible. There is no excuse too good to allow anyone to indulge in profanity and not express remorse and seek forgiveness. ] (]) 14:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Incivility is however only a part of the whole issue. ] (]) 15:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:11, 7 March 2022
This user has opted out of talkbacks
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. DangerousPanda has not edited Misplaced Pages since 27 December 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This is DangerousPanda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 |
Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Evidence submission closed for DangerousPanda arbitration case
Let's leave this here. One can recognize the legitimacy of ArbCom, but there's no human being who can recognize the legitimacy of this decision. Talk about incivility, abuse of power, a failure to investigate even a smidgen of the supposed evidence. However, trials and summary execution in absentia is the lowest of the low. the panda ₯’ 12:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi DP, the evidence submission for the case closed today, the drafting arbitrators are willing to grant a brief extension for you to rebut the evidence which has been submitted if you ask for it in a timely manner. However they intend that the case will progress on schedule. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hello DP. It might be in your interest to take the opportunity to respond. The evidence is significant though not open-and-shut. (The best organized summary is perhaps in the page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/DangerousPanda/Evidence/RFCU). The most significant thing (to me) is your over-the-top rhetoric in some cases, for instance here. Callanecc said that you can provide rebuttal. I assume this means you can make a response at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/DangerousPanda/Evidence. I don't see much chance of progress unless you're willing to make a concession that some things you did weren't a good idea. Why not ask User:Callanecc what section to respond in. It would be hard to be an admin and not make *any* mistakes. You might also make some promise on how you intend to use your multiple accounts in the future. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- I haven't been involved in the case, or even really watching it, but I think it would certainly make sense for you to do what Ed suggests above. No one who has ever seriously considered being an admin, let alone anyone who has ever been one, honestly expects them to be perfect in all of their behavior. I have never gotten the impression that ArbCom tries to necessarily hold all admins to the standard of perfection. I have every reason to believe that any input you offer would be very seriously considered by the arbs and could very easily have a significant impact on their decision. John Carter (talk) 20:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Panda, I agree with Ed. Drmies (talk) 06:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Drmies: @EdJohnston: @John Carter: Oh, it has always been my intent to respond. However, even NE Ent - and Worm that Turned - knew that I was going to be away from Misplaced Pages for about a month before he filed his ArbCom case ... a little difficult to respond when I'm nowhere near a computer. Today's my first day back, and I've found a great number of surprises the panda ɛˢˡ” 17:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- FWIW, I think it would be s shame if ArbCom felt the need for drastic sanctions against you due to the absence of a response and clarification from you. IMO you're too good an admin for the project to lose you. (I believe that even if the Evidence section is closed, you can make your points in the Workshop.) BMK (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Why don't you all leave your thoughts in the Workshop? How many admin actions has DP done? Check the logs and count 'em. What percent of these actions have been criticised in the case? Is that an acceptable error rate? DP, are you so fed up with NE Ent
houndingpursuing you that you are toonauseatedworn down to respond? Does NE Ent have a history ofhoundingpursuing other administrators? These are all questions that should be addressed. I want to see both sides of this dispute presented effectively so there can be a fair result. Leaving the accusers to say whatever they like un-refuted is a mistake. Jehochman 04:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)- Although NE Ent is, technically, an editor of Misplaced Pages, it has been a long time since he has been a contributor in any meaningful sense. He is, in fact, a free-rider, using Misplaced Pages as a debating club and a social experiment for his own political and philosophical concerns. I'm sure he believes that his behavior is useful to the project in some fashion, but we have far, far too many NE Ents around here, and would do well to redirect their energies into actually improving the encyclopedia; if that's not possible, they should be gotten rid of.
One step towards redirecting them would be to start eliminating some of the large number of places which enable these folks to shirk actual editing in favor of social engineering. Another might be to institute some sort of quid pro quo whereby participation in those forums is dependent on a certain level of encyclopedia improvement.
Certainly, what we should not be doing is rewarding the free-riders' lack of value to the project by taking them seriously when they unnecessarily cause problems for editors who actually contribute to the encyclopedia. When real contributors disagree with other real contributors, those are conflicts which deserve the energy and attention of the community to resolve; when free-riders like NE Ent are in conflict with real contributors, they should not expect to be given the time of day, which just encourages further shirking. BMK (talk) 05:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Funny rant! (No bias, for sure!) The arbcase is not yet closed, NE Ent is an involved party. So why not put your $ where your mouth is and go make a proposal for sanction ("
they should be gotten rid of
"), Mr. Big Stuff!? Ihardlythinkso (talk) 04:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Re: "Mr. Big Stuff" Ouch, that hurt. What are you, 10? BMK (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Funny rant! (No bias, for sure!) The arbcase is not yet closed, NE Ent is an involved party. So why not put your $ where your mouth is and go make a proposal for sanction ("
- Although NE Ent is, technically, an editor of Misplaced Pages, it has been a long time since he has been a contributor in any meaningful sense. He is, in fact, a free-rider, using Misplaced Pages as a debating club and a social experiment for his own political and philosophical concerns. I'm sure he believes that his behavior is useful to the project in some fashion, but we have far, far too many NE Ents around here, and would do well to redirect their energies into actually improving the encyclopedia; if that's not possible, they should be gotten rid of.
Your Arb Case
Hey DP - It looks like you're going to lose your mop. I wanted to say that regardless whether you have the mop or not, you're still a valued editor. I don't want to see you go over losing a flag. Perhaps you weren't ready for it, perhaps the Arbs got this wrong - in either sense, you're still needed here. Dusti 23:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hell, yes. Speaking from experience here, it can be a lot easier to contribute to the encyclopedia in terms of content related matters without the bit than it is with it. Particularly with some of the new school programs and the access to databanks. I just today saw that there is actually going to be a class program related to the religion field beginning next month. Finally. That content, frankly, has been a bloody mess for years, and having some help in it will be wonderful. And the list of other school projects is a lot longer than I had thought. An experienced editor aware of the system can ultimately do a lot in those projects, or, even, just looking at the articles we don't yet have and helping build them.
- Family issues can arise for everyone. Particularly if the family is close. And, honestly, this really is a particularly miserable time of year for anyone to bring anything to ArbCom.
- Take off all the time for the holidays as you feel like. But I sincerely hope that you realize that in a lot of ways, particularly in directly content related matters, you can probably accomplish more without the bit than with it and having to do so many admin things. John Carter (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
It's not a requirement. But, would you refrain from using your 'alternate' account, at the case? GoodDay (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Also, signing your replies as "the panda" may confuse editors not "in the know". Like me. ```Buster Seven Talk 17:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Um, huh? My alternate account is for use when I'm not at home - because at home is the only secure place where I trust being logged into that admin account. When I am at work, or elsewhere, I log into my alternate account. I've already been accused of choosing to not participate in the case, are you therefore suggesting that I refrain from participating until I'm back at home? That seems counterproductive and counterintuitive, now that I'm actually available with Misplaced Pages actually being accessible to me! the panda ɛˢˡ” 17:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- TBH, I don't quite understand your reasoning. But, I'll just count that as a failing on my part & won't trouble you any further. GoodDay (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- DP, regarding what and how to comment on the proposed decision my suggestion would be that you start a new level two section and comment on each of the proposals piece by piece (may a level 3 section each or however you want to format it) within that level two section. I'll put a discussion box around it so that there won't be threaded discussion within it and you can focus on the commenting on the decision then reply to others in a sub/another section. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi DP, similar to Dusti, I hope you continue editing. In fact, I hope you regain your mop in due course. Your involvement with unblock requests will be missed. Kindest, PhilKnight (talk) 07:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
Hi DP. I'm a newbie and just learning how to communicate with other Wikipedians. I just want to wish you a happy end-of-year holiday (if you observe it) and thank you for approving my request to reverse my erroneous block. May 2015 be your best year ever! EdnaClyde (talk 05:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Seasonal Greets!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello DangerousPanda, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/DangerousPanda closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedy has been enacted:
1.1) For his violations of the standards of conduct expected of administrators, DangerousPanda (talk · contribs) is desysopped. He may regain the tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, let me know when I actually get to participate in said case. the panda ₯’ 10:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Merry Christmas! Lugnuts 11:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi DangerousPanda, this is just to inform you that I have removed administrator status from your main account and from 7SeriesBOT - the latter being in accordance with the bot policy. Now that's out the way, I hope you've been having a decent holiday season and I do wish you the best. Acalamari 12:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, in response to your rather obviously biased comment here, I can honestly say, as someone who has been sympathetic to your situation, that the thing that virtually no one but you can consider legitimate are your rather transparent misrepresentations of fact regarding your own ability to edit and contribute to the discussion in an appropriate way at the appropriate time. Your comments, I regret to say, make it even harder for me to see anyone else ever necessarily trusting you in your statements of opinion again. Unfortunately. John Carter (talk) 16:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- (removed from inside archived area) @John Carter: I cannot fathom that lack of good faith. My family does not do laptops, tablets, etc. I'd scan hotel receipts, train tickets, etc, but that would violate my privacy even more. I did not control the time my in-laws spent here - but, as the man of the house, it was my job to keep them "entertained" as per cultural patriarchy. Since culturally they don't celebrate Christmas, I could not even install outdoor lights, decorate, etc until after they were gone, so I had t odo that after they left. I had to chauffeur them everywhere, and they wanted to see as much of the country that their daughter/sister had adopted (and Canada is, after all, a big country), plus a whackload of side trips. There was no humanly-possible way for me to be online. Hell, I got to play Farmville for the first time in ages on Christmas Eve (we don't do much Facebook usually, since most of the family don't even have internet yet!) the panda ₯’ 20:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- So you had no access to WP/chance to reply from the date the case opened (19th Nov) until it closed?! Yet you appear online about 2hrs after the verdict was given to complain about it. Lugnuts 11:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- You'll want to recheck your timings. When I became available, I immediately began the process of replying to evidence, etc. Clear proof of my intent to participate the panda ₯’ 11:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Intent being the key word there. You then played the absentia card. Maybe all the users who thought you were a good editor would have lept to your defence? Oh, wait... Lugnuts 10:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- You'll want to recheck your timings. When I became available, I immediately began the process of replying to evidence, etc. Clear proof of my intent to participate the panda ₯’ 11:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- You had supported an indefinite block(when I was the subject), later on you had closed that report with a nice message and you had given me some tips. I still remember that encouragement. You were a very nice admin and your knowledge of policies was amazing. Hope you won't give up. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
I never really knew you, but as a fellow "abusive" ex-admin from another wiki, I'm all too familiar with what you're going through and I'm sorry it turned out the way it did. Best wishes for the future. ekips39 09:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hey DP. I have mixed feelings about the decision. It was kind of inevitable, which makes the case look like a show trial. I'm sure the arbs were well-intentioned, but I don't think there was any realistic prospect of it going any other way. I don't think you were the terrible admin you were made out to be by some parties, but admins are vulnerable because the good work goes mostly unnoticed. You made a few bad judgements, and you didn't always handle things as well as you could have, so it's hard to disagree with the ultimate result but it is a shame, and I hope you'll stick around and continue to do good work without the bit. I'm available if you need an admin for something. A belated merry Christmas and happy new year. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi DP, I'm sorry to see that was how it went. ArbCom is a big black box to me, but for what little it's worth, I'm shocked and saddened. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- DP, Harry has hit the nail on the head and I echo all his thoughts entirely. Arbs are generally a good bunch and, if anything, they are often too lenient. When an admin gets called to book however, it's a different ball game and the Committee is under enormous pressure to demonstrate that justice will be done. It's a shame you just happened to be that scapegoat. Take care, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Heather Morris (voice actress) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heather Morris (voice actress) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Heather Morris (voice actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Re creating page
I am musician from india,kerala.I created my wikipedia page years back.that deleted.Why it deleted ? i need to re create it now.what should i do ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanoop robert (talk • contribs) 05:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'd be bold and re-create it. DPanda doesn't come around much now, he's busy washing his socks. Lugnuts 19:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Due to your conflict of interest you should NOT create or directly edit any article or content about yourself. If you think that you meet the minimum criteria for a stand alone article, you can request that someone make it for you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Stub barnstar userbox
Hi DangerousPanda. I very much appreciate the barnstar user boxes you made. You're only missing one that I want to display; the Stub Barnstar. Any chance you can make that one? I'd be happy to provide a review of something or help you with some project in return for making it. Let me know. Cheers. Freikorp (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry
Montreal, Mar 15. 2015
Hi
I'm sorry I never apologized for my off-the-cuff remarks a few years back when the page i tried to make for Joaquin Lievano was taken down.
I'm doing so now.
Cheers
Nick (Nicholas Robinson, a.k.a. tonbo0422) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonbo0422 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Jason Leopold
Hey, remember that topic ban for Jimmy McDaniels (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? He's back as 104.12.136.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and violating the ban. Skyerise (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:Missing Wikipedians
I have added you to this page since you haven't edited for a few months. If you ever return, remove your name from the list. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Crimson Alberta Ferretti dress of Uma Thurman
Please userfy the talk page. I have added an additional three sources as of 2013 consensus has changed and these dress are notable per Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Silver Giorgio Armani dress of Cate Blanchett. Is it okay for me to restore without discussion given these changes or do you prefer DRV? Valoem 21:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Invitation
I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 19:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
Wikipedians by degree
Hi, Category:Wikipedians by degree is a container cat (subcats only). Please consider a more specific subcat if you wish to categorize User:DangerousPanda. Thanks, Slivicon (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Gregaga
User:Gregaga, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gregaga and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gregaga during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Belated thanks
Hi, I know it is late, but I never thanked you for your support on the aftermath of Criticism of Nortel and the Nortel deleted wikiproject. Ottawahitech (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Turkish Kurdistan
Hi, Bruskom(User) is making vandalism on the article. Greater Armenia and Turkish Kurdistan shares same area historically. I dont know the aim of the users but this users doesn't want to be known this information. Also Encyclopædia Britannica informations are always removed by this users without any reason. Please, stop the vandalizm Antmqr (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Greater Armenia - https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=greater+armenia&biw=1920&bih=947&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio986KyNLJAhVBWxQKHQgxC0MQ_AUIBigB#imgrc=-cBSdyVTYxbs8M%3A
- Kurdistan - https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=greater+armenia&biw=1920&bih=947&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio986KyNLJAhVBWxQKHQgxC0MQ_AUIBigB#tbm=isch&q=cia+kurdistan&imgrc=gSas0O3Q96I2hM%3A
Greyhound-Syfa listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greyhound-Syfa. Since you had some involvement with the Greyhound-Syfa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Aoidh (talk) 09:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Official page / website
You have messaged me about the changes I made to some pages as official pages / website of some indian celebrities with the reason "I didn't edit links nor is it my website. The website belongs to Shammi Kapoor who heads the kapoor family. The added links were back to his site which represents the entire family site. The links were added on the pages of the family members of the website."
I have authentication letters from all the four celebrities who have assignment me as their technical person to handle their websites and social media. I need to make this immediate changes as soon as possible. Please revert of how to do it and how can I send you those authorisation letters on a non-public forum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefinalmiracle (talk • contribs) 17:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Official page / website
The links I have edited are official sites even if they dont appear to be. i have authentication from the artists with the permission to make these changes and represent their social media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefinalmiracle (talk • contribs) 05:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Official page / website
The links I have edited are official sites even if they dont appear to be. i have authentication from the artists with the permission to make these changes and represent their social media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefinalmiracle (talk • contribs) 05:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thefinalmiracle, DangerousPanda left Misplaced Pages two years ago. Could I be of any help to you? Zero 15:40, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Bots Newsletter, April 2017
Bots Newsletter, April 2017 | |
---|---|
Greetings! The BAG Newsletter is now the Bots Newsletter, per discussion. As such, we've subscribed all bot operators to the newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include:
Magioladitis ARBCOM case has closed. The remedies of the case include:
We currently have 27 open bot requests at Misplaced Pages:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing!
There are multiple ongoing discussions surrounding bot-related matters. In particular:
Several new things are around:
Wikimania 2017 is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, let us know! Thank you! edited by:Headbomb 11:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC) (You can unsubscribe from future newsletters by removing your name from this list.) |
Since you've been inactive since 2014, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Pocomail for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pocomail is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pocomail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Hi, In 2012 you tried to help me understand how Misplaced Pages works when I wanted to add a page for someone I felt was misrepresented in the Misplaced Pages pages. I've been away due to illness for sometime, but coming back I still wasn't clear. I have reviewed the notes you made for me at that time and also have had support from the WP community. I am going to keep adding pages when I can now, as am working with people who need the help (COI clearly declared!). I just wanted to say thank you for your patience and to let you know I appreciated the time you took to try to explain. I have only created one article so far, and it has needed help but the next one I have a better understanding I think, even though I think I may have moved it not reading the words tools for reviewers:) So sorry about that. But thanks again for your help. Ackee123 (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC) |
About your deletion of 2012-13 U.S. winter storm season
How was there consensus for deletion? There was:
- 6 keeps, 4 of which were strong
- 6 deletes, 0 of which were strong
- 1 rename, 1 of which was strong
- 1 comment, 0 of which were strong
It seems like the page shouldn't have been deleted, due to no consensus. By the way, I would support keeping it but renaming it to 2012–13 North American winter. The N User I have no ideas for what to put here. Care to differ or discuss? 18:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- @The Nth User: I hope you do realize that 1) the deletion discussion was closed about 5 years ago, and contesting the deletion is pretty much useless at this point, and 2) Dangerous Panda hasn't edited Misplaced Pages since 2014. SkyWarrior 23:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Unblock an
Template:Unblock an has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (/What I been doing) 19:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Marcos Caballero and Lelo Sejean
Hello. Can you help as I ask for reconsideration of the recreation of two previous deleted articles, that two players now play in the Paraguay División Intermedia, so as to be fully professional sports league on Wiki. Respectfully. Rojodiablcerrocerrocerro (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Rojodiablcerrocerrocerro, Dangerous Panda has not edited Misplaced Pages in over 5 years. You may want to create the articles in Draft space - Draft:Marcos Caballero and Draft:Lelo Sejean and go through the WP:AFC process, especially given one of them was deleted after a discussion. Ravensfire (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
Ten years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ontario Country Performer and Fan Association for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ontario Country Performer and Fan Association is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ontario Country Performer and Fan Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
JayJay 02:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Draft: Vaibhav Maloo
Hello, do take a look at the notability factor now, of this page, a lot has changed. Thanks. You have protected this page. User:DangerousPanda — User :Nuttyprofessor2016
- (talk page stalker) @Nuttyprofessor2016: I don't have context for what you are asking, but I'm pretty sure you won't be getting a response from him. He's been off Misplaced Pages for 7 or 8 years. Toddst1 (talk) 01:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)