Misplaced Pages

talk:Featured article candidates: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:38, 5 July 2013 editBencherlite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users65,622 edits →"Who is in charge of the clattering train?" (ack. E. J. Milliken): endorse Ian's approach← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:25, 15 January 2025 edit undoSerial Number 54129 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,691 edits →FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for December 2024: note 
Line 1: Line 1:
<includeonly></includeonly>{{skip to bottom}}{{shortcut|WT:FAC}}{{FA sidebar|expanded=FAC}}
{{User:Deckiller/FAC urgents|style=font-size:88%; width:23em; table-layout:fixed;}}
{{shortcut|WT:FAC}}
{{User:Tony1/FAR urgents|style=font-size:88%; width:23em; table-layout:fixed;}}
{{Template:FCDW/T|style=font-size:88%; width:23em;}}
{{archives {{archives
|collapsed= yes
|style = font-size:88%; width:23em; |style = font-size:88%; width:23em;
|auto = no |auto = no
|editbox= no |editbox = no
|search = yes |search = yes
|prefix = Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates/archive |searchprefix = Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates/archive

|bot=MiszaBot II
|age=2
|units=weeks

|1=<div class="nowraplinks"> |1=<div class="nowraplinks">
] ] ] ]
Line 39: Line 32:
] ] ] ] ] ]
] ] <br /> ] ] <br />
] ] ] ] (2013)<br />
] ] ] (2014)<br />
<center>'''Archives by topic:'''<br />
] (2015)<br/>

] ] (2016)<br/>
] ] ] (2017)<br />
] ] ] ] ] (2018)<br />
] ] ] (2019)<br />
] ] ] ] ] ] (2020)<br />
] ] ] ] (2021)<br />
] ] (2022)<br />
] ] ] (2023)<br />
] ] (2023–24)
<div style="text-align: center;">'''Archives by topic:'''<br />
], ] ], ]
</div> </div></div>
}} }}
{{Archive basics
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates/archive%(counter)d
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 59 |counter = 95
|maxsize= 150000
|algo = old(21d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates/archive%(counter)2d
}} }}
{{dablink|For a "table of contents"-only list of candidates, see ] and ].}} {{dablink|Page too long and unwieldy? Try adding ] to ].}}
{{dablink|For a list of foreign-language reviewers see ].}} {{dablink|For a list of foreign-language reviewers see ].}}
{{Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates/Image and source check requests}}
==FAC mentoring: first-time nominators==
<!-- please do not archive this note or move its position on this page -->
<!-- DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE ] 09:21, 8 May 2053 (UTC) -->
A voluntary mentoring scheme, designed to help first-time FAC nominators through the process and to improve their chances of a successful outcome, is now in action. Click ] for further details. Experienced FAC editors, with five or more "stars" behind them, are invited to consider adding their names to the list of possible mentors, also found in the link. ] (]) 10:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


== Image/source check requests == ==FAC source reviews==
<!-- please do not archive this note or move its position on this page -->

For advice on conducting source reviews, see ].
<!-- ] 09:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC) -->
*] -- source review <s>and image check</s> would be great thanks. - ] <sup>]</sup> 05:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
:*Image check '''Done''' - all OK (i usually don't like PD-because, but with the complex situation for the infobox image it's probably a good solution). ] (]) 07:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
*] -- source review pls. Cheers, ] (]) 15:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

== Dup link tool ==

Is there a duplicate links tool? Does it know to ignore duplication between captions, infoboxes or references and the main text?--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
:I see the sidebar link now. I forgot I had it.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

I have removed the above nomination from the list, as it has been deleted. I am noting it here in case anyone believes that it should be restored and formally archived. No one but the nominator (who requested that the page be deleted) edited the nomination. ] (]) 18:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
:Tks for that. Cheers, ] (]) 11:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

== Most FACs for a single article? ==

Does anyone know what the record is? (Successful or unsuccessful) —] (]) 22:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
:I don't know what the record is but ] passed not so long ago. I have seen some 7s (don't recall if they passed), but I don't know what the highest passing number is.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 23:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
::A quick search reveals ] (successful) and ] / ] / ] (unsuccessful). None of the latter three have an "archive10". I cannot find an "archive8" or "archive9" apart from these three. ]] 23:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

Delegates requested to check any issues related to ]. I don't doubt that most of, if not all, of these support !votes were made without any undue influence, but I am concerned over the possibility of a tainted process. If the delegates consider my concerns to be a bit too conservative, I will strike my oppose !vote.&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 16:39, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:I have commented there, but I can't speak for Ian who might have a different opinion. ] (]) 20:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


== FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for November 2024 ==
== Depth of reviews ==


Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for November 2024. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The has been updated with this data, but the has not. ] (] - ] - ]) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I happened to read the TFA tonight and right away, several statements that looked "off" caught my eye; an examination of the sources revealed issues. should be picked up at FAC (]). (Thank you Crisco for the quick corrections, but my concern is that a more thorough review for accurate representation of sources should be undertaken.) ] (]) 04:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
{{collapse top|Reviewers for November 2024}}
*Have checked three sources in that article, found a couple issues (one was a pagination issue) but generally accurate.&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 05:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
{| class="wikitable sortable"
** Kudos on you for getting on this so quickly and further reviewing the sources !! Could someone fix one last thing while it's still on the mainpage? There are synonyms for "damage"; can we not use it twice in one sentence in the TFA blurb? I would also like to suggest that three supports has historically been a minimum for promotion, it is not a given, and random spot checks for prose and accurate representation of sources can be helpful, particularly in an environment of declining reviewers. In this particular case, I was alarmed to find on the mainpage statements that stood out like sore thumbs as items that needed to be checked vs. the source. Thanks again Crisco for resolving this so quickly, regards, ] (]) 13:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
!'''# reviews'''
***Sorry I missed your post here (looks like it came at a time I was sleeping).&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
! colspan="4" |Type of review
|-
!Reviewer
! data-sort-type="number" |Content
! data-sort-type="number" |Source
! data-sort-type="number" |Image
! data-sort-type="number" |Accessibility
|-
|Nikkimaria
|3
|1
|17
|
|-
|SchroCat
|14
|6
|
|
|-
|Jo-Jo Eumerus
|
|7
|3
|
|-
|Crisco 1492
|9
|
|
|
|-
|Generalissima
|5
|1
|2
|
|-
|Matarisvan
|6
|1
|1
|
|-
|Hog Farm
|6
|
|1
|
|-
|Aoba47
|3
|2
|
|
|-
|Dudley Miles
|5
|
|
|
|-
|UndercoverClassicist
|5
|
|
|
|-
|750h+
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Gog the Mild
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Boneless Pizza!
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Borsoka
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Ceoil
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Gerda Arendt
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Graham Beards
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Hurricanehink
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Premeditated Chaos
|1
|2
|
|
|-
|TheJoebro64
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Tim riley
|3
|
|
|
|-
|AirshipJungleman29
|2
|
|
|
|-
|ChrisTheDude
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Cukie Gherkin
|
|1
|1
|
|-
|Draken Bowser
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Epicgenius
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Heartfox
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Jens Lallensack
|2
|
|
|
|-
|MaranoFan
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Medxvo
|1
|1
|
|
|-
|PARAKANYAA
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Phlsph7
|
|
|2
|
|-
|Piotrus
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Vacant0
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Ajpolino
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Balon Greyjoy
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Biruitorul
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Caeciliusinhorto
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Choliamb
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Czar
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Dugan Murphy
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Eddie891
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Eem dik doun in toene
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Fifelfoo
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Gen. Quon
|1
|
|
|
|-
|HAL333
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Hawkeye7
|1
|
|
|
|-
|IntentionallyDense
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Ippantekina
|1
|
|
|
|-
|JennyOz
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Joeyquism
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Johnbod
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Jonesey95
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Kavyansh.Singh
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Lankyant
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Lazman321
|
|1
|
|
|-
|LittleLazyLass
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Mike Christie
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Mrfoogles
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Mujinga
|1
|
|
|
|-
|NegativeMP1
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Nick-D
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Paleface Jack
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Panini!
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Relativity
|1
|
|
|
|-
|RFNirmala
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Rjjiii
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Sammi Brie
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Shapeyness
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Shushugah
|1
|
|
|
|-
|SnowFire
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Srnec
|1
|
|
|
|-
|The Rambling Man
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Thelifeofan413
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Thuiop
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Tintor2
|1
|
|
|
|-
|TompaDompa
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Volcanoguy
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Wehwalt
|1
|
|
|
|-
|WikiOriginal-9
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Wtfiv
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Zmbro
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Zzzs
|1
|
|
|
|-
|'''Totals'''
|'''155'''
|'''26'''
|'''27'''
|
|-
|}
{{collapse bottom}}
{{collapse top|Supports and opposes for November 2024}}
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!'''# declarations'''
! colspan="7" |'''Declaration'''
|-
!'''Editor'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Support'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Oppose converted to support'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Struck oppose'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Struck support'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Oppose'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''None'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Total'''
|-
|Nikkimaria
|
|
|
|
|3
|18
|21
|-
|SchroCat
|8
|
|
|
|4
|8
|20
|-
|Jo-Jo Eumerus
|
|
|
|
|
|10
|10
|-
|Crisco 1492
|9
|
|
|
|
|
|9
|-
|Generalissima
|3
|
|
|
|2
|3
|8
|-
|Matarisvan
|5
|
|
|
|
|3
|8
|-
|Hog Farm
|5
|
|1
|
|
|1
|7
|-
|Aoba47
|2
|
|
|
|
|3
|5
|-
|UndercoverClassicist
|4
|
|
|
|1
|
|5
|-
|Dudley Miles
|3
|
|
|
|
|2
|5
|-
|750h+
|4
|
|
|
|
|
|4
|-
|Gog the Mild
|2
|
|
|
|1
|1
|4
|-
|Tim riley
|3
|
|
|
|
|
|3
|-
|Premeditated Chaos
|1
|
|
|
|
|2
|3
|-
|Gerda Arendt
|2
|
|
|
|
|1
|3
|-
|Hurricanehink
|3
|
|
|
|
|
|3
|-
|Borsoka
|3
|
|
|
|
|
|3
|-
|Graham Beards
|3
|
|
|
|
|
|3
|-
|Boneless Pizza!
|2
|
|
|
|1
|
|3
|-
|TheJoebro64
|2
|
|
|
|1
|
|3
|-
|Ceoil
|2
|
|
|
|
|1
|3
|-
|Vacant0
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|PARAKANYAA
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|2
|-
|Draken Bowser
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|Piotrus
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|ChrisTheDude
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|Heartfox
|1
|
|
|
|1
|
|2
|-
|MaranoFan
|1
|
|
|1
|
|
|2
|-
|AirshipJungleman29
|1
|
|
|
|1
|
|2
|-
|Phlsph7
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|2
|-
|Epicgenius
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|Jens Lallensack
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|Cukie Gherkin
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|2
|-
|Medxvo
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|Lankyant
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|IntentionallyDense
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Balon Greyjoy
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Caeciliusinhorto
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Ajpolino
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|The Rambling Man
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Shapeyness
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Nick-D
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Paleface Jack
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Gen. Quon
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Joeyquism
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|LittleLazyLass
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Jonesey95
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Zzzs
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Thelifeofan413
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|JennyOz
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Srnec
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|SnowFire
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Choliamb
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Lazman321
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|WikiOriginal-9
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Mike Christie
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Hawkeye7
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Wtfiv
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Eem dik doun in toene
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Thuiop
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Fifelfoo
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|1
|-
|NegativeMP1
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Dugan Murphy
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Wehwalt
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Mrfoogles
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Czar
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Rjjiii
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Volcanoguy
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|RFNirmala
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Kavyansh.Singh
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|TompaDompa
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Johnbod
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Panini!
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Sammi Brie
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Zmbro
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Relativity
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Tintor2
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Biruitorul
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Eddie891
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Shushugah
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Mujinga
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|HAL333
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Ippantekina
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|'''Totals'''
|'''105'''
|
|'''1'''
|'''1'''
|'''16'''
|'''85'''
|'''208'''
|}
{{collapse bottom}}
The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. ] (] - ] - ]) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
{{cot|Nominators for September 2024 to November 2024 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months}}
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!
!Nominations (12 mos)
!Reviews (12 mos)
!Ratio (12 mos)
|-
|750h+
|6.0
|51.0
|8.5
|-
|AirshipJungleman29
|7.0
|39.0
|5.6
|-
|Amir Ghandi
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Boneless Pizza!
|2.5
|8.0
|3.2
|-
|ChrisTheDude
|9.0
|66.0
|7.3
|-
|Darkwarriorblake
|6.0
|3.0
|0.5
|-
|Dudley Miles
|6.0
|33.0
|5.5
|-
|Dugan Murphy
|3.0
|14.0
|4.7
|-
|Dxneo
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Eem dik doun in toene
|3.0
|10.0
|3.3
|-
|Epicgenius
|8.5
|17.0
|2.0
|-
|FunkMonk
|2.8
|27.0
|9.5
|-
|Generalissima
|9.0
|61.0
|6.8
|-
|Hawkeye7
|5.0
|7.0
|1.4
|-
|Hog Farm
|7.0
|49.0
|7.0
|-
|Hurricanehink
|2.5
|19.0
|7.6
|-
|Ippantekina
|5.0
|6.0
|1.2
|-
|Jens Lallensack
|3.3
|28.0
|8.4
|-
|Jo-Jo Eumerus
|6.0
|218.0
|36.3
|-
|Joeyquism
|3.0
|17.0
|5.7
|-
|Kurzon
|3.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Kyle Peake
|4.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Llewee
|2.0
|7.0
|3.5
|-
|M4V3R1CK32
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|MaranoFan
|5.0
|14.0
|2.8
|-
|Mike Christie
|6.0
|54.0
|9.0
|-
|NegativeMP1
|3.0
|11.0
|3.7
|-
|Nick-D
|2.0
|15.0
|7.5
|-
|Noorullah21
|4.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Paleface Jack
|3.0
|3.0
|1.0
|-
|Peacemaker67
|6.0
|2.0
|0.3
|-
|Phlsph7
|5.0
|16.0
|3.2
|-
|Pollosito
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Premeditated Chaos
|8.3
|35.0
|4.2
|-
|Relayed
|2.0
|1.0
|0.5
|-
|Sammi Brie
|3.0
|12.0
|4.0
|-
|SchroCat
|15.0
|155.0
|10.3
|-
|Serial Number 54129
|3.0
|39.0
|13.0
|-
|The ed17
|2.0
|1.0
|0.5
|-
|The Green Star Collector
|3.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Thebiguglyalien
|5.0
|3.0
|0.6
|-
|Tim riley
|5.0
|52.0
|10.4
|-
|TrademarkedTWOrantula
|3.0
|2.0
|0.7
|-
|Turini2
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|UndercoverClassicist
|6.0
|89.0
|14.8
|-
|Volcanoguy
|4.0
|7.0
|1.8
|-
|Wehwalt
|7.5
|29.0
|3.9
|}
{{cob}}
-- ] (] - ] - ]) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
>>>


== Input from FA-experienced editors requested regarding quality of an existing featured article ==
== Can anyone please comment? ==


I would appreciate input at ]. This is one of my earliest FACs, and I would appreciate some additional thoughts to make sure I'm not being too harsh on myself; this one isn't really up to my current standard. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 04:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
It's been two months since I nominated ]. It currently has three supports and one oppose; who has failed to revisit after s/he requested a c/e which was performed in a timely matter. I would really like to see this nomination end very soon since it already has a consensus of passing, but it needs more supports/comments from the community. Thanks, ]] 00:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
:Post your concerns directly on Graham Colm's talk page. ] ] 00:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
::I did and s/he did not replied. Best, ]] 00:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
:::I have replied on the FAC page. ] (]) 06:13, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


== On source reviews for foreign language sources ==
== "Who is in charge of the clattering train?" (ack. E. J. Milliken) ==


] came down to three sources that were offline and in Farsi. I know that ] to get at offline sources, but I wonder if anyone's sitting on a way to handle spotchecks or sourcechecks when the source to be checked is in a foreign language. Folks vouched for DeepL on Hungarian sources and I think Polish sources too, but is Google Translate reliable for translating Farsi? I don't feel comfortable with skipping certain sources just because it's too hard to verify them, so these need to be checked as well. ] (]) 11:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Can someone advise me of who is in charge of featured articles these days? The system is working well on a day-to-day basis; Ian and Graham are doing sterling service on the FAC, as is Bencherlite at TFA and, I am sure, other delegates at FAR. But they all have specified responsibilities, and cannot be expected to take on work beyond the range of their duties. However, the nominal FA director has shown no involvement or interest in the project for the past five months. I have a specific suggestion, not within the delegates' remit, which could require executive action, the sort of thing that a couple of years ago I would routinely have taken up with Raul. I see no point now in posting my query on his talk; he is not responding to any postings, not even to the gift of a pie. So what would be my most productive course of action? ] (]) 19:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
: found that GT was 67.5% reliable for translating medical phrases into Farsi. If the sources are linguistically complicated, I would expect the reliability to be around the same; if they are linguistically simple, the reliability will go up. GT has also improved since 2021. ] (]) 11:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
:I would be interested in your suggestion. Perhaps here might be a good place to start? ] (]) 20:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
*I agree with Graham. I think this is the place to float suggestions, and personally I don't see why consensus can't be reached here - before the train runs away, so to speak. ] (]) 20:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC) ::I would assume good faith if other sources' spot-check did not indicate unverified statements or close paraphrasing. In this case, the nominator could also be requested to provide a translation. ] (]) 05:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:*OK, my general suggestion is that there should be a concerted drive to extend the current free JSTOR access available at present to selected editors. Further, as a general policy aim, we should seek to acquire access through other paywalls, such as Cambridge Journals and Oxford Journals and should begin investigating this as soon as possible. The latter suggestion may not be tenable at present, but we should have an aim and a strategy. With regard to JSTOR, I have a few specific concerns:
::*The pilot scheme whereby 100 editors were given free access to the JSTOR archive expires in November 2013. Are any steps in hand to extend this? If not, it's important that there should be some speedy action in this respect. November is only four months away.
::*Has any monitoring taken place to determine the extent to which this facility has been used by the editors with free access? Do we have any "sleepers" sitting on wasted accounts?
::*Do we know whether any of the editors who signed up ] below the 100-place mark have been given access?


== Archive problem ==
:*Raul654 is nominally the WP community's JSTOR contact. Whatever the future of the Featured Article Director title, someone needs to replace him in this specific role, with authority to speak on behalf of the community in any negotiations that may be necessary. ] (]) 23:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


There seems to have been a problem with the bot archiving ]. The bot has not added ] or ] to the page or updated ]. ] (]) 04:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Well, it seems that I am alone in worrying that the complimentary JSTOR access might be withdrawn in November and that there is no obvious leadership in position to renegotiate this arrangement. I'm not interested in another marathon argument about who or what should succeed Raul as FA director, but rather in who is going to take responsibility for this specific task. ] (]) 15:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:Tks, I think I've located so the bot will complete the archiving process next time it runs -- FYI {{u|Hawkeye7}}. Cheers, ] (]) 07:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
:Sorry Brian, didn't notice your earlier comment. Yes, I am worried because I'm a slow editor, real life gets in the way at times, and I recently thought I should either go on a mass downloading spree or something, because I'll be unhappy when we lose access to JSTOR. I think that a year isn't long enough to gauge how effective it's been - bringing an article to FA takes a fair bit of time (at least for me), so I can only point to a few from this year, but all have relied on Jstor. ] (]) 15:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
::Yes. It has run now. ] ] 08:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
:::I thought Stephen Walling at the WMF had actually dealt with JSTOR. He's currently no doubt stressed-out dealing with the introduction of the Visual Editor, but might be the best person to ask. ] (]) 16:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


== Tools to scan article for a quality check? ==
::Hi Brian, as John says, it was ] at the WMF who was dealing with JSTOR. My understanding at the time this was set up is that the first 100 would have access for one year, then the next 100 would. It would be great if that could be renegotiated so that lots of us, not only 100, will have continued access, but given how long the first negotiations took, trying to extend the subscriptions could be lengthy too. I'd therefore suggest that you contact Steven asap with your concerns, although he's likely to be tied up with the Visual Editor at the moment. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 19:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


I seem to recall there were some tools an editor could run on an article that would scan it and identify some errors, particularly with citations. The tools that I'm thinking of were more-or-less part of the FA process, I seem to recall. I'm looking for these tools (in ]) but cannot find them. Am I dreaming, or are there such tools? ] (]) 19:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Thanks for the ping. Today is a holiday in the U.S. but I can answer all of Brian's questions tonight or tomorrow. (I am still in touch with our contact at JSTOR from time to time.) <font style="font-family:Georgia, serif;">]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]</font> 19:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
*{{re|Noleander}} ] highlights unreferenced statements in articles. It's not perfect, but it helps a lot. Usually, FAC candidates do not have this concern. ] highlights sources of concern, including unreliable, potentially unreliable, or blacklisted sources. ] will highlight sources listed as a reference, but not used as an inline citation. Entries have to be double-checked because citations that are formatted differently might produce false positives. Hope this helps. ] (]) 20:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
*:Nice info, thanks! ] (]) 20:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


== FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for December 2024 ==
:I've been doing a bit of reading lately on the federal judiciary in the US, so that may have influenced my opinions here. I see the role of the FA Director in two lights:
:#He or she assures the smooth functioning of the overall FA process by keeping the subprocesses (FAC, FAR, TFA) staffed with the appropriate decision makers.
:#Rarely, he or she adjudicates any controversies that rise above the level of decision making by the delegates at those subprocesses. This could involve closing FACs/FARs where the active delegates have to recuse, etc.
:To keep those roles impartial, I've felt that the FA Director needed some level of independence as well as a level of accountability to the community. Serving in the role "during good behavior" and as long as the person was "willing and able" gave that independence. That the delegates' appointments were insulated from a direct popular vote also gave them the independence needed to truly decide whether or not an article merited promotion or demotion without the potential political fallout at election time. That isn't to say that the community couldn't replace the director, when circumstances warranted, or petition to have a delegate removed as needed.
:At this time, I think circumstances warrant some action. I propose that the greater FA community proceed to elect a new FA Director. Interested candidates for the job should have a reasonable period to come forward with a nomination statement, and then the community should have a reasonable period to vote. Thoughts? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> 21:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for December 2024; thanks to Hog Farm for doing the analysis on these. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The has been updated with this data, but the has not. ] (] - ] - ]) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
*What about naming Graham and Ian co-directors? They seem to have been doing all the work for a while. Any thoughts about setting up an RFC to do that? ] (]) 21:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
{{collapse top|Reviewers for December 2024}}
**Nothing against that, but remember that the FA director also oversees FAR and TFA, so I don't know that this would be the best solution organizationally. --''']]]''' 23:37, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
{| class="wikitable sortable"
***I have to ask this one simple question. Why is Raul654 still listed as the FA Director when he has not shown up in 5 months? He should be removed immediately, whether or not a suitable replacement is currently available. Not to do so makes the whole concept of even having a FA Director look like a complete farce. For the time being, the current delegates can continue to go on doing what they are doing and be called delegates. Whether there is one person called a "director" at the moment is insignificant. Raul654 should be removed immediately without any further delay. ] (]) 22:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
!'''# reviews'''
! colspan="4" |Type of review
|-
!Reviewer
! data-sort-type="number" |Content
! data-sort-type="number" |Source
! data-sort-type="number" |Image
! data-sort-type="number" |Accessibility
|-
|Nikkimaria
|2
|
|18
|
|-
|Jo-Jo Eumerus
|1
|14
|4
|
|-
|SchroCat
|15
|4
|
|
|-
|Crisco 1492
|9
|
|1
|
|-
|ChrisTheDude
|9
|
|
|
|-
|Generalissima
|5
|1
|3
|
|-
|Gog the Mild
|9
|
|
|
|-
|AirshipJungleman29
|7
|
|
|
|-
|Tim riley
|7
|
|
|
|-
|750h+
|5
|
|
|
|-
|Aoba47
|5
|
|
|
|-
|UndercoverClassicist
|5
|
|
|
|-
|Borsoka
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Dudley Miles
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Graham Beards
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Hog Farm
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Medxvo
|2
|2
|
|
|-
|Mike Christie
|4
|
|
|
|-
|Premeditated Chaos
|2
|1
|1
|
|-
|Serial Number 54129
|3
|1
|
|
|-
|Ajpolino
|2
|1
|
|
|-
|Epicgenius
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Heartfox
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Jens Lallensack
|3
|
|
|
|-
|Arconning
|1
|1
|
|
|-
|Ceoil
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Edwininlondon
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Eewilson
|1
|1
|
|
|-
|FrB.TG
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Hurricanehink
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Johnbod
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Lee Vilenski
|2
|
|
|
|-
|MaranoFan
|2
|
|
|
|-
|MSincccc
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Mujinga
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Phlsph7
|
|
|2
|
|-
|Rodney Baggins
|1
|1
|
|
|-
|RoySmith
|2
|
|
|
|-
|Apoxyomenus
|1
|
|
|
|-
|AstrooKai
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Averageuntitleduser
|1
|
|
|
|-
|BennyOnTheLoose
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Biz
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Boneless Pizza!
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Buidhe
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Caeciliusinhorto
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Casliber
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Choliamb
|1
|
|
|
|-
|David Fuchs
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Dreameditsbrooklyn
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Dugan Murphy
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Dxneo
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Dylan620
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Eric Idle's Cat
|1
|
|
|
|-
|FunkMonk
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Ganesha811
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Ian Rose
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Iazyges
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Ibjaja055
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Ippantekina
|1
|
|
|
|-
|It is a wonderful world
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Jon698
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Kavyansh.Singh
|1
|
|
|
|-
|KJP1
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Lazman321
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Llewee
|1
|
|
|
|-
|MadonnaFan
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Matarisvan
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Mikenorton
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Nick-D
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Pendright
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Reading Beans
|
|1
|
|
|-
|Rjjiii
|
|
|1
|
|-
|Rollinginhisgrave
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Sawyer777
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Sgubaldo
|1
|
|
|
|-
|SounderBruce
|
|1
|
|
|-
|ThaesOfereode
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Tkbrett
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Trainsandotherthings
|1
|
|
|
|-
|Wehwalt
|1
|
|
|
|-
|ZKang123
|1
|
|
|
|-
|'''Totals'''
|'''178'''
|'''32'''
|'''30'''
|
|-
|}
{{collapse bottom}}
{{collapse top|Supports and opposes for December 2024}}
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!'''# declarations'''
! colspan="7" |'''Declaration'''
|-
!'''Editor'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Support'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Oppose converted to support'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Struck oppose'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Struck support'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Oppose'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''None'''
! data-sort-type="number" |'''Total'''
|-
|Nikkimaria
|
|
|
|
|1
|19
|20
|-
|SchroCat
|9
|
|
|
|4
|6
|19
|-
|Jo-Jo Eumerus
|1
|
|
|
|
|18
|19
|-
|Crisco 1492
|9
|
|
|
|
|1
|10
|-
|ChrisTheDude
|7
|
|
|
|2
|
|9
|-
|Generalissima
|5
|
|
|
|
|4
|9
|-
|Gog the Mild
|5
|
|
|
|3
|1
|9
|-
|Tim riley
|7
|
|
|
|
|
|7
|-
|AirshipJungleman29
|3
|
|
|
|1
|3
|7
|-
|Aoba47
|3
|
|
|
|1
|1
|5
|-
|750h+
|5
|
|
|
|
|
|5
|-
|UndercoverClassicist
|3
|
|
|
|1
|1
|5
|-
|Graham Beards
|3
|
|
|
|1
|
|4
|-
|Mike Christie
|1
|
|
|
|1
|2
|4
|-
|Hog Farm
|3
|
|
|
|
|1
|4
|-
|Serial Number 54129
|
|
|
|
|
|4
|4
|-
|Medxvo
|2
|
|
|
|
|2
|4
|-
|Premeditated Chaos
|2
|
|
|
|
|2
|4
|-
|Dudley Miles
|4
|
|
|
|
|
|4
|-
|Borsoka
|3
|
|
|
|1
|
|4
|-
|Epicgenius
|3
|
|
|
|
|
|3
|-
|Jens Lallensack
|1
|
|
|
|
|2
|3
|-
|Heartfox
|
|
|
|
|3
|
|3
|-
|Ajpolino
|2
|
|
|
|
|1
|3
|-
|Phlsph7
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|2
|-
|Lee Vilenski
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|Arconning
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|FrB.TG
|
|
|1
|
|1
|
|2
|-
|Johnbod
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|MaranoFan
|1
|
|
|
|1
|
|2
|-
|Eewilson
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|RoySmith
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|2
|-
|Mujinga
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|Hurricanehink
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|Rodney Baggins
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|Edwininlondon
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|MSincccc
|1
|
|
|
|
|1
|2
|-
|Ceoil
|2
|
|
|
|
|
|2
|-
|Rjjiii
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Nick-D
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Buidhe
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|MadonnaFan
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Eric Idle's Cat
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|KJP1
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Dreameditsbrooklyn
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Reading Beans
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Boneless Pizza!
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|It is a wonderful world
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Ippantekina
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Sgubaldo
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Lazman321
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Pendright
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|SounderBruce
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Jon698
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Rollinginhisgrave
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Iazyges
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Apoxyomenus
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|David Fuchs
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Trainsandotherthings
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Ibjaja055
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Matarisvan
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Dylan620
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Ganesha811
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|ThaesOfereode
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Sawyer777
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Ian Rose
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Wehwalt
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Choliamb
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Biz
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|BennyOnTheLoose
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Tkbrett
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|ZKang123
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|1
|-
|Kavyansh.Singh
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|1
|-
|Dugan Murphy
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Llewee
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Dxneo
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|Casliber
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Mikenorton
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|AstrooKai
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|1
|-
|FunkMonk
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Caeciliusinhorto
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|Averageuntitleduser
|1
|
|
|
|
|
|1
|-
|'''Totals'''
|'''121'''
|
|'''1'''
|
|'''23'''
|'''95'''
|'''240'''
|}
{{collapse bottom}}
The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. ] (] - ] - ]) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
{{cot|Nominators for October 2024 to December 2024 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months}}
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!
!Nominations (12 mos)
!Reviews (12 mos)
!Ratio (12 mos)
|-
|750h+
|7.0
|56.0
|8.0
|-
|AirshipJungleman29
|7.0
|46.0
|6.6
|-
|Amir Ghandi
|3.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|BernaBotto
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Boneless Pizza!
|2.5
|9.0
|3.6
|-
|Chrishm21
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|ChrisTheDude
|9.0
|71.0
|7.9
|-
|Crisco 1492
|2.0
|25.0
|12.5
|-
|Darkwarriorblake
|6.0
|3.0
|0.5
|-
|Dudley Miles
|6.0
|33.0
|5.5
|-
|Dugan Murphy
|3.0
|13.0
|4.3
|-
|Dxneo
|2.0
|1.0
|0.5
|-
|Eem dik doun in toene
|3.0
|10.0
|3.3
|-
|Epicgenius
|8.5
|20.0
|2.4
|-
|Eric Idle's Cat
|2.0
|1.0
|0.5
|-
|Ganesha811
|3.0
|2.0
|0.7
|-
|Generalissima
|10.0
|70.0
|7.0
|-
|Gog the Mild
|2.0
|82.0
|41.0
|-
|Hawkeye7
|5.0
|6.0
|1.2
|-
|Heartfox
|5.0
|28.0
|5.6
|-
|Hog Farm
|7.0
|53.0
|7.6
|-
|Hurricanehink
|2.5
|20.0
|8.0
|-
|Ippantekina
|6.0
|7.0
|1.2
|-
|Jenhawk777
|2.0
|3.0
|1.5
|-
|Jens Lallensack
|2.3
|29.0
|12.4
|-
|Jo-Jo Eumerus
|6.0
|228.0
|38.0
|-
|Joeyquism
|3.0
|17.0
|5.7
|-
|Kyle Peake
|4.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Lee Vilenski
|4.0
|4.0
|1.0
|-
|Llewee
|2.0
|8.0
|4.0
|-
|M4V3R1CK32
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|MaranoFan
|5.0
|14.0
|2.8
|-
|Mike Christie
|6.0
|55.0
|9.2
|-
|NegativeMP1
|3.0
|11.0
|3.7
|-
|Noorullah21
|4.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Peacemaker67
|6.0
|2.0
|0.3
|-
|Phlsph7
|5.0
|18.0
|3.6
|-
|Pollosito
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Premeditated Chaos
|9.3
|38.0
|4.1
|-
|PSA
|3.0
|4.0
|1.3
|-
|Relayed
|2.0
|1.0
|0.5
|-
|Royiswariii
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Sammi Brie
|3.0
|12.0
|4.0
|-
|SchroCat
|16.5
|169.0
|10.2
|-
|The Green Star Collector
|3.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|Thebiguglyalien
|5.0
|3.0
|0.6
|-
|Thuiop
|2.0
|1.0
|0.5
|-
|UndercoverClassicist
|7.0
|92.0
|13.1
|-
|Volcanoguy
|5.0
|7.0
|1.4
|-
|Wehwalt
|7.5
|26.0
|3.5
|-
|XR228
|2.0
|None
|0.0
|-
|ZKang123
|5.0
|12.0
|2.4
|}
{{cob}}
One interesting statistical note: the annual overall oppose percentage (number of opposes divided by the sum of opposes and supports) is 13% for 2024; that's higher than for any year in the last eleven years. It's only once been over 9% since 2014. ] (] - ] - ]) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)


==Requested move==
'''Comment'''
A Featured Article move request is ] and may be of interest to this project. ]'']''] 12:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:Sorry Brian for not responding earlier. A few of the other delegates and I have communicated on the JSTOR subject and I don't think we can add much to what's already been written above. I think JSTOR and the FA Director position were always separate issues, i.e. two different hats that Raul's worn, but since the question of Raul's absence as FA Director has been brought up again, let me offer a few thoughts on that at least -- my colleagues can jump in any time...
:I'm in no hurry either to put someone new into the FA Director's role, or to eliminate it. Given Raul's great service to Featured Content over the years, I'd like to see him retain the title even if only in an honorary sense. The delegates were always supposed to take on all the responsibilities of the FAC Director bar appointing further delegates, and making the final decision if there was any issue about whether an article might or might not appear as TFA. ] has demonstrated that in Raul's absence he’s prepared to take – in consultation with the community -- the final decision re. controversial TFAs, so I consider that a non-issue now. I think there are also enough Featured Content delegates in total for them to consult and allocate responsibilities between themselves if there's risks to a job being performed. For instance Bencherlite is effectively running TFA single-handledly at the moment, but I understand now that ] is prepared to make herself available to provide backup at TFA in addition to her FAR duties, which should mitigate that risk. Cheers, ] (]) 06:06, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
::I endorse Ian's approach and his analysis of the limited role of the FA Director as it had become over time (i.e. to appoint the delegates to do the day-to-day work and to be the person with the final say on TFAs). I agree that the community is able to discuss the issue of controversial TFAs in a way that enables me (as the only active TFA person at present) to close such decisions based on consensus e.g. ]. I also agree that there are sufficient delegates available to deal with matters if there are problems at another branch of FA-land. I also agree that there is no bar as I see it to Raul retaining his title as FA Director as an honorary or emeritus position to recognise the work that he did here over many years, with no need to cast around for a successor. I welcome Nikkimaria's offer to assist at TFA, and would also note in this context that Dabomb87 has been in touch to say that he no longer feels able to be a TFA delegate given his current absence from Misplaced Pages. ]] 12:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:25, 15 January 2025

    Shortcut
    Pages, tools and templates for
    Featured articles
    Articles seeking peer review
    before featured article candidacy
    Unanswered peer reviews
    FACs needing feedback
    view • edit
    2007 Greensburg tornado Review it now
    Belvidere Apollo Theatre collapse Review it now
    Featured article removal candidates
    Boogeyman 2 Review now
    Shoshone National Forest Review now
    Northrop YF-23 Review now
    Emmy Noether Review now
    Concerto delle donne Review now

    Featured article review

    Talk notices given
    1. Diocletianic Persecution 2020-05-03
    2. Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky 2020-05-22
    3. Underwater diving 2020-09-15
    4. Józef Piłsudski 2020-09-25, 2021-08-07
    5. Supernatural (season 1) 2020-11-02
    6. Supernatural (season 2) 2020-11-02
    7. Kahaani 2020-11-18 2023-02-25
    8. Major depressive disorder 2020-11-20 2022-08-18 2024-11-19
    9. India 2020-11-29 and 2023-11-28
    10. 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash 2020-11-30
    11. Tumbler Ridge 2020-12-26 2024-11-19
    12. Glacier National Park (U.S.) 2020-12-30
    13. Ivan Bagramyan 2021-02-21
    14. Bird 2021-02-21
    15. Hamilton, Ontario 2021-02-22
    16. Comet Hyakutake 2021-02-22
    17. Mary Wollstonecraft 2021-03-03
    18. Postage stamps of Ireland 2021-03-11, 2023-03-25
    19. The Joy of Sect 2021-04-08
    20. The World Ends with You 2021-04-23
    21. Defense of the Ancients 2021-06-10
    22. Dwarf planet 2021-08-14
    23. Robert Garran 2021-10-09
    24. Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna
      of Russia       2021-11-27
    25. Hurricane Edith (1971) 2021-12-04
    26. Meteorological history of Hurricane Jeanne 2021-12-05
    27. Meteorological history of Hurricane Gordon 2021-12-05
    28. Hurricane Dean 2021-12-05
    29. Meteorological history of Hurricane Wilma 2021-12-05
    30. Meteorological history of Hurricane Ivan 2021-12-05
    31. Effects of Hurricane Ivan
      in the Lesser Antilles
      and South America       2021-12-05
    32. Tropical Storm Bonnie (2004) 2021-12-05
    33. Tropical Storm Henri (2003) 2021-12-05
    34. Tropical Storm Edouard (2002) 2021-12-05
    35. Hurricane Fabian 2021-12-05
    36. Effects of Hurricane Isabel in
      Maryland and Washington, D.C.       2021-12-06
    37. Hurricane Erika (1997) 2021-12-06
    38. Hurricane Isabel 2021-12-06
    39. Hurricane Kenna 2021-12-06
    40. Typhoon Pongsona 2021-12-07
    41. Hubble Space Telescope 2022-01-08
    42. Dürer's Rhinoceros 2022-02-04
    43. Io (moon) 2022-02-13
    44. Solar eclipse 2022-04-30
    45. Manchester 2022-05-12
    46. Transformers (film) 2022-06-05
    47. Slate industry in Wales 2022-07-05
      Working
    48. Schizophrenia 2022-08-18
    49. Amanita muscaria 2022-08-26
    50. Battle of Corydon 2022-10-10
    51. White Deer Hole Creek 2022-10-22
      Work ongoing December 2022
    52. Mayan languages 2022-11-19
    53. Sentence spacing 2022-11-19
    54. Indigenous people of the Everglades region 2022-11-21
    55. First-move advantage in chess 2022-11-21
    56. King Arthur 2022-11-22
    57. Stephen Crane 2022-11-22
    58. Mark Kerry 2022-12-01
    59. California Gold Rush 2022-12-02
    60. Harry McNish Noticed 2022-12-03
    61. History of Lithuania (1219–1295) 2022-12-03
    62. Władysław II Jagiełło 2022-12-03
    63. David I of Scotland 2022-12-03
    64. Coeliac disease 2022-12-03
    65. Metabolism 2022-12-03
    66. Northern bald ibis 2022-12-09
    67. Cane toad 2022-12-09
    68. Boeing 777 2022-12-09
    69. Second Crusade 2022-12-09
    70. Delichon 2022-12-10
    71. Rock martin 2022-12-10
    72. Lion 2022-12-10
    73. Victoria Cross for New Zealand 2023-01-01
      Work ongoing January 2023
    74. Bengali language movement 2023-01-15
    75. USS New Jersey (BB-62) 2023-01-23
    76. West Wycombe Park 2023-01-25
    77. Holkham Hall 2023-01-25
    78. Redshift 2023-01-26
    79. Angkor Wat 2023-01-28
    80. Jack Sheppard 2023-02-02
    81. Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna of Russia 2023-02-12
    82. Guy Fawkes Night 2023-02-14
    83. Marcus Trescothick 2023-02-22
    84. Moe Berg 2023-03-10
    85. Falaise Pocket 2023-03-29
    86. James Nesbitt 2023-03-29
    87. Johnstown Inclined Plane 2023-04-23
    88. Dengue fever 2023-04-30
    89. Wood Badge 2023-05-15
    90. Hurricane Claudette (2003) 2023-05-16
    91. Cleveland 2023-05-16
    92. Buildings and architecture of Bristol 2023-05-20
    93. Oregon State Capitol 2023-06-02
    94. Surrender of Japan 2023-06-30
    95. Felice Beato 2023-08-04
    96. Augustus 2023-08-08
    97. Caspar David Friedrich 2023-08-13
    98. Jocelin of Glasgow 2023-11-01
    99. Ancient Egypt 2023-11-18
    100. Acetic acid 2023-12-8
    101. Eric Brewer (ice hockey) 2024-01-02
    102. Adelaide Anne Procter 2024-01-30
    103. Boston 2024-04-15
    104. Borscht 2024-06-15
    105. Khan Noonien Singh 2024-07-03
    106. Taylor Swift 2024-08-02
    107. Nahuatl 2024-08-04
    108. Carnivàle 2024-08-09
    109. Your Power 2024-08-16
    110. Washington, D.C. 2024-08-27
    111. George Washington (inventor) 2024-08-30
    112. Alien vs. Predator (film) 2024-10-26
    113. Mom and Dad (1945 film) 2024-10-26
    114. A Cure for Pokeritis 2024-10-26
    115. Zombie Nightmare 2024-10-26
    116. Naruto Uzumaki 2024-12-31
    117. Oxygen 2025-1-14
    118. Chrono Trigger 2025-1-18
    Find more: Unreviewed featured articles
    Scripts and tools
    Article alerts
    Guidance
    Advice pages
    Writing
    Image and source reviewing
    Archiving icon
    Archives

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (April Fools 2005) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 (2007) 22 23 24 25
    26 (2008) 27 28 29 30 31 (Short FAs) 32 (Short FAs cont) 33 34 (Context and notability)
    35 (2009) 36 (new FAC/FAR delegates) 37 38 39 (alt text) 40 41
    42 (2010) 43 (RFC) 44 45 46 47 48 (Plagiarism, new FAC delegate)
    49 (2011) 50 51 52 53
    54 (2012) 55 (RFC) 56 57 58
    59 60 (2013)
    61 62 63 (proposals) (2014)
    64 (2015)
    65 66 (2016)
    67 68 69 (2017)
    70 71 72 73 74 (2018)
    75 76 77 (2019)
    78 79 80 81 82 83 (2020)
    84 85 86 87 (2021)
    88 89 (2022)
    90 91 92 (2023)
    93 94 (2023–24)

    Archives by topic:

    Alt text, Citation templates (load times)


    Page too long and unwieldy? Try adding nominations viewer to your scripts page. For a list of foreign-language reviewers see FAC foreign language reviewers.

    Image/source check requests

    Current requests

    Requests should only be posted here for FAC nominations that have attracted several reviews and declarations of support. Premature requests can be removed by any editor.

    FAC mentoring: first-time nominators

    A voluntary mentoring scheme, designed to help first-time FAC nominators through the process and to improve their chances of a successful outcome, is now in action. Click here for further details. Experienced FAC editors, with five or more "stars" behind them, are invited to consider adding their names to the list of possible mentors, also found in the link. Brianboulton (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

    FAC source reviews

    For advice on conducting source reviews, see Misplaced Pages:Guidance on source reviewing at FAC.

    FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for November 2024

    Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for November 2024. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The new facstats tool has been updated with this data, but the old facstats tool has not. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

    Reviewers for November 2024
    # reviews Type of review
    Reviewer Content Source Image Accessibility
    Nikkimaria 3 1 17
    SchroCat 14 6
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 7 3
    Crisco 1492 9
    Generalissima 5 1 2
    Matarisvan 6 1 1
    Hog Farm 6 1
    Aoba47 3 2
    Dudley Miles 5
    UndercoverClassicist 5
    750h+ 4
    Gog the Mild 4
    Boneless Pizza! 3
    Borsoka 3
    Ceoil 3
    Gerda Arendt 3
    Graham Beards 3
    Hurricanehink 3
    Premeditated Chaos 1 2
    TheJoebro64 3
    Tim riley 3
    AirshipJungleman29 2
    ChrisTheDude 2
    Cukie Gherkin 1 1
    Draken Bowser 2
    Epicgenius 2
    Heartfox 2
    Jens Lallensack 2
    MaranoFan 2
    Medxvo 1 1
    PARAKANYAA 2
    Phlsph7 2
    Piotrus 2
    Vacant0 2
    Ajpolino 1
    Balon Greyjoy 1
    Biruitorul 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1
    Choliamb 1
    Czar 1
    Dugan Murphy 1
    Eddie891 1
    Eem dik doun in toene 1
    Fifelfoo 1
    Gen. Quon 1
    HAL333 1
    Hawkeye7 1
    IntentionallyDense 1
    Ippantekina 1
    JennyOz 1
    Joeyquism 1
    Johnbod 1
    Jonesey95 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1
    Lankyant 1
    Lazman321 1
    LittleLazyLass 1
    Mike Christie 1
    Mrfoogles 1
    Mujinga 1
    NegativeMP1 1
    Nick-D 1
    Paleface Jack 1
    Panini! 1
    Relativity 1
    RFNirmala 1
    Rjjiii 1
    Sammi Brie 1
    Shapeyness 1
    Shushugah 1
    SnowFire 1
    Srnec 1
    The Rambling Man 1
    Thelifeofan413 1
    Thuiop 1
    Tintor2 1
    TompaDompa 1
    Volcanoguy 1
    Wehwalt 1
    WikiOriginal-9 1
    Wtfiv 1
    Zmbro 1
    Zzzs 1
    Totals 155 26 27
    Supports and opposes for November 2024
    # declarations Declaration
    Editor Support Oppose converted to support Struck oppose Struck support Oppose None Total
    Nikkimaria 3 18 21
    SchroCat 8 4 8 20
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 10 10
    Crisco 1492 9 9
    Generalissima 3 2 3 8
    Matarisvan 5 3 8
    Hog Farm 5 1 1 7
    Aoba47 2 3 5
    UndercoverClassicist 4 1 5
    Dudley Miles 3 2 5
    750h+ 4 4
    Gog the Mild 2 1 1 4
    Tim riley 3 3
    Premeditated Chaos 1 2 3
    Gerda Arendt 2 1 3
    Hurricanehink 3 3
    Borsoka 3 3
    Graham Beards 3 3
    Boneless Pizza! 2 1 3
    TheJoebro64 2 1 3
    Ceoil 2 1 3
    Vacant0 2 2
    PARAKANYAA 2 2
    Draken Bowser 1 1 2
    Piotrus 1 1 2
    ChrisTheDude 2 2
    Heartfox 1 1 2
    MaranoFan 1 1 2
    AirshipJungleman29 1 1 2
    Phlsph7 2 2
    Epicgenius 2 2
    Jens Lallensack 2 2
    Cukie Gherkin 2 2
    Medxvo 1 1 2
    Lankyant 1 1
    IntentionallyDense 1 1
    Balon Greyjoy 1 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1 1
    Ajpolino 1 1
    The Rambling Man 1 1
    Shapeyness 1 1
    Nick-D 1 1
    Paleface Jack 1 1
    Gen. Quon 1 1
    Joeyquism 1 1
    LittleLazyLass 1 1
    Jonesey95 1 1
    Zzzs 1 1
    Thelifeofan413 1 1
    JennyOz 1 1
    Srnec 1 1
    SnowFire 1 1
    Choliamb 1 1
    Lazman321 1 1
    WikiOriginal-9 1 1
    Mike Christie 1 1
    Hawkeye7 1 1
    Wtfiv 1 1
    Eem dik doun in toene 1 1
    Thuiop 1 1
    Fifelfoo 1 1
    NegativeMP1 1 1
    Dugan Murphy 1 1
    Wehwalt 1 1
    Mrfoogles 1 1
    Czar 1 1
    Rjjiii 1 1
    Volcanoguy 1 1
    RFNirmala 1 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1 1
    TompaDompa 1 1
    Johnbod 1 1
    Panini! 1 1
    Sammi Brie 1 1
    Zmbro 1 1
    Relativity 1 1
    Tintor2 1 1
    Biruitorul 1 1
    Eddie891 1 1
    Shushugah 1 1
    Mujinga 1 1
    HAL333 1 1
    Ippantekina 1 1
    Totals 105 1 1 16 85 208

    The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

    Nominators for September 2024 to November 2024 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months
    Nominations (12 mos) Reviews (12 mos) Ratio (12 mos)
    750h+ 6.0 51.0 8.5
    AirshipJungleman29 7.0 39.0 5.6
    Amir Ghandi 2.0 None 0.0
    Boneless Pizza! 2.5 8.0 3.2
    ChrisTheDude 9.0 66.0 7.3
    Darkwarriorblake 6.0 3.0 0.5
    Dudley Miles 6.0 33.0 5.5
    Dugan Murphy 3.0 14.0 4.7
    Dxneo 2.0 None 0.0
    Eem dik doun in toene 3.0 10.0 3.3
    Epicgenius 8.5 17.0 2.0
    FunkMonk 2.8 27.0 9.5
    Generalissima 9.0 61.0 6.8
    Hawkeye7 5.0 7.0 1.4
    Hog Farm 7.0 49.0 7.0
    Hurricanehink 2.5 19.0 7.6
    Ippantekina 5.0 6.0 1.2
    Jens Lallensack 3.3 28.0 8.4
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 6.0 218.0 36.3
    Joeyquism 3.0 17.0 5.7
    Kurzon 3.0 None 0.0
    Kyle Peake 4.0 None 0.0
    Llewee 2.0 7.0 3.5
    M4V3R1CK32 2.0 None 0.0
    MaranoFan 5.0 14.0 2.8
    Mike Christie 6.0 54.0 9.0
    NegativeMP1 3.0 11.0 3.7
    Nick-D 2.0 15.0 7.5
    Noorullah21 4.0 None 0.0
    Paleface Jack 3.0 3.0 1.0
    Peacemaker67 6.0 2.0 0.3
    Phlsph7 5.0 16.0 3.2
    Pollosito 2.0 None 0.0
    Premeditated Chaos 8.3 35.0 4.2
    Relayed 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Sammi Brie 3.0 12.0 4.0
    SchroCat 15.0 155.0 10.3
    Serial Number 54129 3.0 39.0 13.0
    The ed17 2.0 1.0 0.5
    The Green Star Collector 3.0 None 0.0
    Thebiguglyalien 5.0 3.0 0.6
    Tim riley 5.0 52.0 10.4
    TrademarkedTWOrantula 3.0 2.0 0.7
    Turini2 2.0 None 0.0
    UndercoverClassicist 6.0 89.0 14.8
    Volcanoguy 4.0 7.0 1.8
    Wehwalt 7.5 29.0 3.9

    -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC) >>>

    Input from FA-experienced editors requested regarding quality of an existing featured article

    I would appreciate input at Talk:Landis's Missouri Battery#Revamping. This is one of my earliest FACs, and I would appreciate some additional thoughts to make sure I'm not being too harsh on myself; this one isn't really up to my current standard. Hog Farm Talk 04:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    On source reviews for foreign language sources

    Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Hurra-yi Khuttali/archive2 came down to three sources that were offline and in Farsi. I know that there are ways to get at offline sources, but I wonder if anyone's sitting on a way to handle spotchecks or sourcechecks when the source to be checked is in a foreign language. Folks vouched for DeepL on Hungarian sources and I think Polish sources too, but is Google Translate reliable for translating Farsi? I don't feel comfortable with skipping certain sources just because it's too hard to verify them, so these need to be checked as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

    This 2021 paper found that GT was 67.5% reliable for translating medical phrases into Farsi. If the sources are linguistically complicated, I would expect the reliability to be around the same; if they are linguistically simple, the reliability will go up. GT has also improved since 2021. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
    I would assume good faith if other sources' spot-check did not indicate unverified statements or close paraphrasing. In this case, the nominator could also be requested to provide a translation. Borsoka (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

    Archive problem

    There seems to have been a problem with the bot archiving Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Corleck Head/archive1. The bot has not added Template:Fa top or Template:Fa bottom to the page or updated Talk:Corleck Head. Steelkamp (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

    Tks, I think I've located the issue so the bot will complete the archiving process next time it runs -- FYI Hawkeye7. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
    Yes. It has run now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

    Tools to scan article for a quality check?

    I seem to recall there were some tools an editor could run on an article that would scan it and identify some errors, particularly with citations. The tools that I'm thinking of were more-or-less part of the FA process, I seem to recall. I'm looking for these tools (in Help:Citation tools) but cannot find them. Am I dreaming, or are there such tools? Noleander (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for December 2024

    Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for December 2024; thanks to Hog Farm for doing the analysis on these. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The new facstats tool has been updated with this data, but the old facstats tool has not. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reviewers for December 2024
    # reviews Type of review
    Reviewer Content Source Image Accessibility
    Nikkimaria 2 18
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 1 14 4
    SchroCat 15 4
    Crisco 1492 9 1
    ChrisTheDude 9
    Generalissima 5 1 3
    Gog the Mild 9
    AirshipJungleman29 7
    Tim riley 7
    750h+ 5
    Aoba47 5
    UndercoverClassicist 5
    Borsoka 4
    Dudley Miles 4
    Graham Beards 4
    Hog Farm 4
    Medxvo 2 2
    Mike Christie 4
    Premeditated Chaos 2 1 1
    Serial Number 54129 3 1
    Ajpolino 2 1
    Epicgenius 3
    Heartfox 3
    Jens Lallensack 3
    Arconning 1 1
    Ceoil 2
    Edwininlondon 2
    Eewilson 1 1
    FrB.TG 2
    Hurricanehink 2
    Johnbod 2
    Lee Vilenski 2
    MaranoFan 2
    MSincccc 2
    Mujinga 2
    Phlsph7 2
    Rodney Baggins 1 1
    RoySmith 2
    Apoxyomenus 1
    AstrooKai 1
    Averageuntitleduser 1
    BennyOnTheLoose 1
    Biz 1
    Boneless Pizza! 1
    Buidhe 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1
    Casliber 1
    Choliamb 1
    David Fuchs 1
    Dreameditsbrooklyn 1
    Dugan Murphy 1
    Dxneo 1
    Dylan620 1
    Eric Idle's Cat 1
    FunkMonk 1
    Ganesha811 1
    Ian Rose 1
    Iazyges 1
    Ibjaja055 1
    Ippantekina 1
    It is a wonderful world 1
    Jon698 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1
    KJP1 1
    Lazman321 1
    Llewee 1
    MadonnaFan 1
    Matarisvan 1
    Mikenorton 1
    Nick-D 1
    Pendright 1
    Reading Beans 1
    Rjjiii 1
    Rollinginhisgrave 1
    Sawyer777 1
    Sgubaldo 1
    SounderBruce 1
    ThaesOfereode 1
    Tkbrett 1
    Trainsandotherthings 1
    Wehwalt 1
    ZKang123 1
    Totals 178 32 30
    Supports and opposes for December 2024
    # declarations Declaration
    Editor Support Oppose converted to support Struck oppose Struck support Oppose None Total
    Nikkimaria 1 19 20
    SchroCat 9 4 6 19
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 1 18 19
    Crisco 1492 9 1 10
    ChrisTheDude 7 2 9
    Generalissima 5 4 9
    Gog the Mild 5 3 1 9
    Tim riley 7 7
    AirshipJungleman29 3 1 3 7
    Aoba47 3 1 1 5
    750h+ 5 5
    UndercoverClassicist 3 1 1 5
    Graham Beards 3 1 4
    Mike Christie 1 1 2 4
    Hog Farm 3 1 4
    Serial Number 54129 4 4
    Medxvo 2 2 4
    Premeditated Chaos 2 2 4
    Dudley Miles 4 4
    Borsoka 3 1 4
    Epicgenius 3 3
    Jens Lallensack 1 2 3
    Heartfox 3 3
    Ajpolino 2 1 3
    Phlsph7 2 2
    Lee Vilenski 2 2
    Arconning 2 2
    FrB.TG 1 1 2
    Johnbod 1 1 2
    MaranoFan 1 1 2
    Eewilson 1 1 2
    RoySmith 2 2
    Mujinga 1 1 2
    Hurricanehink 2 2
    Rodney Baggins 1 1 2
    Edwininlondon 1 1 2
    MSincccc 1 1 2
    Ceoil 2 2
    Rjjiii 1 1
    Nick-D 1 1
    Buidhe 1 1
    MadonnaFan 1 1
    Eric Idle's Cat 1 1
    KJP1 1 1
    Dreameditsbrooklyn 1 1
    Reading Beans 1 1
    Boneless Pizza! 1 1
    It is a wonderful world 1 1
    Ippantekina 1 1
    Sgubaldo 1 1
    Lazman321 1 1
    Pendright 1 1
    SounderBruce 1 1
    Jon698 1 1
    Rollinginhisgrave 1 1
    Iazyges 1 1
    Apoxyomenus 1 1
    David Fuchs 1 1
    Trainsandotherthings 1 1
    Ibjaja055 1 1
    Matarisvan 1 1
    Dylan620 1 1
    Ganesha811 1 1
    ThaesOfereode 1 1
    Sawyer777 1 1
    Ian Rose 1 1
    Wehwalt 1 1
    Choliamb 1 1
    Biz 1 1
    BennyOnTheLoose 1 1
    Tkbrett 1 1
    ZKang123 1 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1 1
    Dugan Murphy 1 1
    Llewee 1 1
    Dxneo 1 1
    Casliber 1 1
    Mikenorton 1 1
    AstrooKai 1 1
    FunkMonk 1 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1 1
    Averageuntitleduser 1 1
    Totals 121 1 23 95 240

    The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

    Nominators for October 2024 to December 2024 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months
    Nominations (12 mos) Reviews (12 mos) Ratio (12 mos)
    750h+ 7.0 56.0 8.0
    AirshipJungleman29 7.0 46.0 6.6
    Amir Ghandi 3.0 None 0.0
    BernaBotto 2.0 None 0.0
    Boneless Pizza! 2.5 9.0 3.6
    Chrishm21 2.0 None 0.0
    ChrisTheDude 9.0 71.0 7.9
    Crisco 1492 2.0 25.0 12.5
    Darkwarriorblake 6.0 3.0 0.5
    Dudley Miles 6.0 33.0 5.5
    Dugan Murphy 3.0 13.0 4.3
    Dxneo 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Eem dik doun in toene 3.0 10.0 3.3
    Epicgenius 8.5 20.0 2.4
    Eric Idle's Cat 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Ganesha811 3.0 2.0 0.7
    Generalissima 10.0 70.0 7.0
    Gog the Mild 2.0 82.0 41.0
    Hawkeye7 5.0 6.0 1.2
    Heartfox 5.0 28.0 5.6
    Hog Farm 7.0 53.0 7.6
    Hurricanehink 2.5 20.0 8.0
    Ippantekina 6.0 7.0 1.2
    Jenhawk777 2.0 3.0 1.5
    Jens Lallensack 2.3 29.0 12.4
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 6.0 228.0 38.0
    Joeyquism 3.0 17.0 5.7
    Kyle Peake 4.0 None 0.0
    Lee Vilenski 4.0 4.0 1.0
    Llewee 2.0 8.0 4.0
    M4V3R1CK32 2.0 None 0.0
    MaranoFan 5.0 14.0 2.8
    Mike Christie 6.0 55.0 9.2
    NegativeMP1 3.0 11.0 3.7
    Noorullah21 4.0 None 0.0
    Peacemaker67 6.0 2.0 0.3
    Phlsph7 5.0 18.0 3.6
    Pollosito 2.0 None 0.0
    Premeditated Chaos 9.3 38.0 4.1
    PSA 3.0 4.0 1.3
    Relayed 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Royiswariii 2.0 None 0.0
    Sammi Brie 3.0 12.0 4.0
    SchroCat 16.5 169.0 10.2
    The Green Star Collector 3.0 None 0.0
    Thebiguglyalien 5.0 3.0 0.6
    Thuiop 2.0 1.0 0.5
    UndercoverClassicist 7.0 92.0 13.1
    Volcanoguy 5.0 7.0 1.4
    Wehwalt 7.5 26.0 3.5
    XR228 2.0 None 0.0
    ZKang123 5.0 12.0 2.4

    One interesting statistical note: the annual overall oppose percentage (number of opposes divided by the sum of opposes and supports) is 13% for 2024; that's higher than for any year in the last eleven years. It's only once been over 9% since 2014. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

    Requested move

    A Featured Article move request is being discussed and may be of interest to this project. SerialNumber54129 12:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates: Difference between revisions Add topic