Talk:2006 Vadodara riots: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:42, 6 July 2013 editDarkness Shines (talk \| contribs)31,762 edits Projects← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 17:32, 17 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,427 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: paws [2.2]
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{DYK talk\|9 July\|2013\|entry=... that the ''']''' were caused by the demolition of the shrine of a medieval ] saint?}}
	{{WPBS\|
	{{WikiProject ~~India~~ \|class= \|~~importance=~~		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|
	~~\|politics=yes~~ \|~~politics-~~importance=		{{WikiProject India\|importance=low
	\|~~history~~ =yes \|~~history~~-importance =		\|politics=yes \|politics-importance=low
	\|~~gujarat~~ =yes \|~~gujarat~~-importance =		\|history =yes \|history-importance =low
			\|gujarat =yes \|gujarat-importance =low
			\|assess-date=December 2014
	}}		}}
	{{WikiProject Islam}}		{{WikiProject Islam\|importance=Low}}
	}}		}}

			== Deletion ==

			The edit summary for edit reads to the effect: "Don't follow my edits". That is no reason to make an edit, please discuss rationale behind changes done. ] (]) 15:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

			== Edit war ==

			, . The article says it was spontaneous and mutual riot with participation from Muslims as well. And court verdict went against the cause for which they caused the riot, putting a template to say "violence against muslim" not permissible unless rs there. Present a scholarly source on talk page that summaries the incident as "violence against Muslims". "the independent commission" is not a scholar or scholarly secondary source. --]<sup>]</sup> 01:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
			: Amritasya, Vanamonde's edit summaries were fairly clear. An independent commission said that the Muslims were targeted by the ''police''. To contest it, you need to find a reliable source that says otherwise, i.e., something that contests the commission's finding that the police targeted Muslims. How the riots started etc. are not all that relevant. ] (]) 07:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
			:: So this is being called a violence against muslims based on some "independent commission". Do we even have any details of this so called "independent commission" ? -] (]) 19:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
			::: It is actually an "independent people's tribunal". The report was cited. Did you try to read it? ] (]) 21:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
			:::: Oh Yes I did read, I missed "people's" from my previous statement (as you did in your previous statement) and my question still remains. It is a NGO from what I understand, so a enquiry by this NGO is used as a basis to declare it as Violence against Muslim? We need better sourcing if you want to use such a template -] (]) 23:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
			::::: May be you can call it "Violence against muslims according to Independent people's tribunal" -] (]) 23:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,

			I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304022625/http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main18.asp?filename=Ne052006The_Secular_CS.asp to http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main18.asp?filename=Ne052006The_Secular_CS.asp

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:32, 17 January 2024

A fact from 2006 Vadodara riots appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 July 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2006 Vadodara riots were caused by the demolition of the shrine of a medieval Sufi saint?

A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2013/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2006 Vadodara riots.

Misplaced Pages

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Gujarat / History / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in December 2014.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion

The edit summary for this edit reads to the effect: "Don't follow my edits". That is no reason to make an edit, please discuss rationale behind changes done. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit war

1, 2. The article says it was spontaneous and mutual riot with participation from Muslims as well. And court verdict went against the cause for which they caused the riot, putting a template to say "violence against muslim" not permissible unless rs there. Present a scholarly source on talk page that summaries the incident as "violence against Muslims". "the independent commission" is not a scholar or scholarly secondary source. --AmritasyaPutra 01:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Amritasya, Vanamonde's edit summaries were fairly clear. An independent commission said that the Muslims were targeted by the police. To contest it, you need to find a reliable source that says otherwise, i.e., something that contests the commission's finding that the police targeted Muslims. How the riots started etc. are not all that relevant. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

So this is being called a violence against muslims based on some "independent commission". Do we even have any details of this so called "independent commission" ? -sarvajna (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

It is actually an "independent people's tribunal". The report was cited. Did you try to read it? Kautilya3 (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Oh Yes I did read, I missed "people's" from my previous statement (as you did in your previous statement) and my question still remains. It is a NGO from what I understand, so a enquiry by this NGO is used as a basis to declare it as Violence against Muslim? We need better sourcing if you want to use such a template -sarvajna (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

May be you can call it "Violence against muslims according to Independent people's tribunal" -sarvajna (talk) 23:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Vadodara riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304022625/http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main18.asp?filename=Ne052006The_Secular_CS.asp to http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main18.asp?filename=Ne052006The_Secular_CS.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Categories: