Revision as of 22:39, 10 July 2013 edit2602:304:6e02:1c89:5cd4:6d29:941b:a348 (talk) →A story I would like to share with you: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:47, 22 January 2025 edit undoMike Selinker (talk | contribs)Administrators111,056 edits Notification: listing of Category:Rankin family of Geelong at WP:Categories for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Administrator topicon}}{{10 Year topicon}} | |||
{{Archive box|box-width=50px|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}} | |||
{{User:GiantSnowman/Archive}} | |||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
== This week's ] (week 4, 2025) == | |||
==Talkback== | |||
{{talkback|Talk:List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_commercial_aircraft#1920_Golders_Green_Handley_Page_O.2F400_crash|ts=18:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
So nobody but me thinks TRM isn't conducting personal attacks? Think again and why letting administrators get away with this isn't good. ] 18:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Not convinced at all that this editor even knows what "personal attack" means here. Even his aviation project colleagues were happy to claim that the edit notice on the disputed list demonstrated ownership despite it being a copy of that on the existing aviation lists and commented on as being OWNership. We've even toned our edit notice down while I see their's are still in full flow. Honestly, and others have noted this, it feels like we're wasting a lot of time with this. ] (]) 22:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{ping|WilliamJE}}, there was no personal attack there - not even close. Please drop this ASAP. ]] 08:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::MilborneOne and one other editor disagree. To top matters off, TRM is now being disruptive by tagging things as unreferenced that are referenced. Why is this administrator being allowed to act in this behavior except for that he is an administrator and therefore can't ever be held liable for his actions? Administrators protect their own around here. After all Mark Arsten is still one and Toddst1 can violate ] without fallout. Rule #1 administrator rule- Protect your own.] 10:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::See ]. I'm just doing exactly what the aviation project want, i.e. check that clicking through target articles in the unrefernced lists actually reference the claims in the unreferenced list in accordance with ]. You can't have it both ways I'm afraid. And now you've resorted to borderline personal attacks claiming I'm acting without ]. Nice one. ] (]) 10:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::William, please provide specific diffs of TRM violating NPA and/or editing disruptively. ]] 10:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::Here and Milborne's reply. Here and here and read the talk page explanation. If he isn't trying to be disruptive and conduct personal attacks, why doesn't he just make ASN a IC instead or try Google News archive and stop making remarks about WP:OWN. He's either being ] or fails ].] 10:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Responding to your diffs: | |||
:::::::: - how on earth is pointing to another, related article a "personal attack"? | |||
:::::::: - ideally should have been tagged with {{tl|refimprove}} and {{tl|inline}} rather than {{tl|unreferenced}}, but that's a minor issue. | |||
:::::::: - same. | |||
::::::: The other two don't relate to actions by TRM, just ''responses'' to them. So again, I'll repeat for the nth time, where are the diffs showing TRM engaging in personal attacks and diruptive editing? ]] 10:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
{| style="width:100%; padding:2px;" class="TAFI-weekly" | |||
:::::::::Just look here You could have found this yourself by looking at the thread instead of pointing out my mistake. | |||
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{AFI/Picture box|week=2025/4}} Hello, GiantSnowman. The ] of the week is: | |||
:::::::::I pointed to his disruptive editing and his continuing ] assaults. Already pointed to multiple times here or at ANI or in that thread. Ignored constantly. You're protecting him.] 10:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Again, you have provided ZERO evidence of any personal attacks or disruptive editing - either put up or shut up. Seriously. ]] 10:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
<span style="font-size:140%;">'''{{Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/2025/4/1}}'''</span> | |||
:::::::::::Milborne One doesn't agree. This editor don't agree either. A third editor says why don't TRM just fix it. In other words he is being pointy.] 10:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::I have already responded to those two editors. It's in "your words", not "other words" that you're accusing me of being pointy and incompetent. Don't try to assume other editors have engaged in personal attacks on me. ] (]) 11:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::On the other hand, accusations of pointy or incompetent editing ''could'' be interpreted as a personal attack... ] (]) 10:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Yep - William, if you don't stop with your baseless accusations (as you have been told multiple times by multiple editors) very sharpish then you could soon find yourself with a short block for disruptive editing and harrassment. ]] 10:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Please be bold and help improve it! | |||
::::::::::Ah here comes the threat of the boomerang by an involved administrator. An administrator insulting a whole project '''Multiple Times''' is acceptable repeated times doesn't earn a block but I am some how getting near one? Why didn't this person get one and yet I'm about too? He's an administrator and I'm not. An administrator is allowed to call someone a 'piece of shit' and face no reprucussion. Administrators protect your own.] 10:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
:::::::::::Who's the involved administrator, me? No, I have been commentating as an uninvolved admin ever since you ran to ANI with this non-issue and I tried to help. As you were told at ANI, 'insulting' a WikiProject (which didn't actually happen) is not the same as a ] - this is something you have been told multiple times. If you cannot see that then you clearly lack the ] to edit here. ]] 10:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Previous selections: {{Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/2025/3/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/2025/2/1}} | |||
:::::::::::(e/c) The ownership link was provided ] and based on an accusation by one of the aviation project's ownership claim. Which I've linked you to already. Did you read it? Now then, please demonstrate evidence of a '''personal''' attack, and refrain from personally attacking me by calling me incompetent and my edits pointed. Thanks. ] (]) 10:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Get involved with the AFI project: ]{{•}} ] | |||
---- | |||
<small>Posted by: <span style="font-family:sans-serif"><b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span> 00:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC) using ] (]) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • {{edit|Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/Participants/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small>{{-}}</div> | |||
|}<!-- Substituted from Template:AFI weekly selections notice --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MusikBot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_improvement/Participants/Notifications&oldid=1269192161 --> | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20#Michael McCann (footballer)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 05:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
This surely deserves page protection, but i'm not an admin... | |||
here are my arguments: SECOND TIME that, without one word of explanation, a vandal removes the PERSONAL section where his legal troubles are discussed, duly referenced. His girlfriend, his boyfriend, Braulio himself wrote? Hell who knows, but i'm getting increasingly frustrated! | |||
Seems like a dynamic IP, so no point in sending a message to his "user", even if it was an account i would not dignify them with a word, this is beyond preposterous and downright vandalism! | |||
Kind regards, happy week --] (]) 20:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
*Added another ref to said PERSONAL section, the only "hot" bit that was not sourced. --] (]) 20:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== ] article == | |||
Hi, when you have a moment, would you mind restoring the ] article to my Sandbox space here... ]. I'd like to see if I can get it up to standards. Thank you, --] (]) 04:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Much appreciated, thank you! --] (]) 15:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Demba Ba == | |||
Hello GS. Could you please protect ]. In a pre-season training match he was seen with No. 19 and many IPs are changing his squad number, even though it has not been offifically confirmed by Chelsea. Thanks. ] (]) 09:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== ANI == | |||
You mentioned on ANI at that fake professor thread that pretending to be something on[REDACTED] is unnacceptable. Could you elaborate on that for me please? Is there actually a policy against claiming to be a professor? Thanks, '''<font color="gold">★]</font>]]]<font color="gold">★</font>''' 12:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Some baklava for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for the article restore. ] (]) 15:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== A story I would like to share with you == | |||
I was hanging out with my cousin James after school today. We were bored, so James suggested that we go into separate rooms and masturbate. I finished early, so I just paced back and forth in the kitchen waiting for him to finish. I glanced out the window, and my aunt was pulling in the driveway! I ran into the room where James was jacking off, with porn open, and I yelled, "DUDE your mom's coming!!" | |||
James turned around and looked at me, still jerking, and screamed, "GET THE TOWEL!!" He cummed all over the floor. I closed the porn and helped him clean up just in time before his mom found out what had just happened. ] (]) 22:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:47, 22 January 2025
Archives |
2006 • 2007 • 2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024 • 2025 • |
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2025)
The prescription symbol, ℞, as printed on the blister pack of a prescription drug
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Pirn • South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot 00:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions |
---|
"Michael McCann (footballer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Michael McCann (footballer) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20 § Michael McCann (footballer) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Category:Rankin family of Geelong has been nominated for renaming
Category:Rankin family of Geelong has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)