Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bri: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:42, 27 July 2013 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,937 editsm Signing comment by Wordsindustry - "Removal the offending and defamatory content.: new section"← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:53, 1 January 2025 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,970 edits Honda Super Cub listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
{{User:Bri/Header}}
{{archive box| {{archive box|
*] *]
Line 7: Line 8:
*] *]
*] *]
*]}} *]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
}}
==] has been nominated for merging==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 21:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Please add new discussion topics to bottom of page -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
== Re:User talk:98.163.109.101: Difference between revisions ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Hi Brianhe. The reason I made those edits to the MS Dynamics and Sage pages was because their pages had far too many listings on the ERP Software category page and it didn't appear very vendor neutral. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:16, 16 February 2013‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
:So you're saying ] should apply to category inclusion? That's absurd. Create a vendor-specific subcategory if needed. — ] (]) 19:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Rollback ==


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
]
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
*Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including ] and ], some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
*Rollback is only for blatant ]
*Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
*Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
*Please read ] and ] to get to know the workings of the feature
*You can test Rollback at ]
*You may wish to display the {{tl|User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{tl|Rollback}} top icon on your user page
:If you have any questions, please do let me know.
] ] 20:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


</div>
==Motorcycle oil==
</div>
Hi. Why did you revert my edit to the "Motorcycle oil" article? The text is somewhat misguiding and confusing. For instance, there is no such thing as a "weight" oil, the "W" in the SAE designation stands for "winter" and refers to the properties of the oil when cold. The description of the syntethic oil looks as if its for a single grade oil with properties that are described like the exact definition of a multi grade oil.
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->


== deleted ==
--] (]) 10:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
:"Weight" and "grade" are described as interchangeable at ]. If this is not so, please provide a source. — ] (]) 14:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


On your creations page, it says that an article was deleted. It is currently blue-linked. Is that your article? ] 17:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
If so, why did you bother changing it, especially when it also contains a better description of the alternative of using multi grade oils?
:If you're referring to ], it looks like it was re-created by another editor. To confirm, open and scroll down to line 559. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
I am aware that the SAE viscosity numbers are sometimes referred to as "oil weights" but the numbers are in fact based upon flow rate at cold(W) and hot temperatures and have nothing whatsoever to do with weight. My idea of this is that the "W" designation on the oil bottles caused a so called "common misconception" when it occured in the early 50's. It is in any case misguiding as the numbers have nothing to do with weight, so I choose not to use it.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 12:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
I tried to post a link here, but the page won't save even if I write in the CAPTCHA correctly. Please google "sae motor oil standards" and you will find. Ideas4ag-ed dot com has an excellent article.


==Concern regarding ]==
--] (]) 18:33, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
] Hello, Bri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
:Why don't you ] and make your changes to ], with citations? Then discuss on the article's talk page. As you know from the prior revert, there are many other people who would like to collaborate on this. Also it's difficult to communicate with someone whose identity (your IP address) changes constantly. — ] (]) 19:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
::By the way there is an answer to your question about your user name here: ]. - ] (]) 20:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
* We really need to go ahead and merge this into ], as ]. State what is different about it, and delete anything else. There shouldn't be any advice about what kind of oil you should use, per ]. --] (]) 20:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
:I don't have a strong feeling on merging the articles, but am coming around to your point of view on this. Are there any cars with shared transmission-engine lubrication? If not, this is probably the only unique element of the MC specific article, and it would be fine to have a subsection to cover it. — ] (]) 00:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
::I can't think of any recent examples, but the BMC ] and early ]s come to mind. ] (]) 08:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
== DYK for Curtiss V-8 motorcycle ==
==] has been nominated for merging==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> '']''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 17:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


== Tower category renames == == Thanks ==


Manual publishing is always a pain in the ass -- thank you for getting it out. <b style="font-family:monospace;color:#E35BD8">]×]]</b> 10:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
India was correct Saudi Arabia was a typo that I fixed on the page. These were listed correctly on the CfD page. ] (]) 23:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
:{{U|JPxG}} Yes, it's a dreary copy-paste fest! Here's hoping whatever's wrong with the script is simple to correct. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 14:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
:Actually I think there was a cut & paste error on several of the nominations. For example the Saudi entry says: subst:cfr2|Television towers in Saudi Arabia|header=Category:Television towers in Japan|Communication towers in Saudi Arabia|... ] (]) 02:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


== Precious == == Seasons Greetings!==


<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#00A86B; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">]]{{-}}
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix">
{{white|{{big|'''''Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ ] 09:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)'''''}}}}
<div>
</div>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}}">]</div>
'''motorcycles'''<br />
Thank you for quality articles for ], such as ], for dedicated reviewing, and for winning an award such as "Most understandable online friend", - you are an ]!


== New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive ==
--] (]) 08:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
</div></div>


{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
==Merge discussion for ]==
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | ] | <span style="font-size: 85%">''']''' </span>
] An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been proposed for a ] with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going {{ #if: Talk:Messerschmitt Kabinenroller#Merge proposal: Messerschmitt KR175, Messerschmitt KR200, and FMR Tg500 into Messerschmitt Kabinenroller |]|to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article}}, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ] (]) 23:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote -->
| rowspan=3 | ]
==FAM1885==
|-
I'm sorry I never responded, my English is not very good. I'm Italian. I hope I have made ​​mistakes but I tried to correct and align some information between versions of wikipedia Italian and English. There is no problem if you want to correct some things. hello and see you soon.Ciao!!!!!!!!! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|
:You are being modest; it's surely better than my Italian. Looking forward to collaborating some more. — ] (]) 14:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
* On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
* Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
* ] will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
* Barnstars will also be granted for ] previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
|}
] (]) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1263150419 -->


== Seattle Misplaced Pages Day, January 11, 2025 ==
Thank you for your compliment. Are registered in Italy as FAM1885 wikipedia, I do not know if you can also register on the UK charts with the same initials. Ciao!!!!
] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Actually, Misplaced Pages is hosted in the USA, where I also happen to be (not the UK). As for the user account, I believe you created FAM1885 at some point, as that account shows activity: ]. you might also be interested in ]. — ] (]) 22:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


{|style="border-radius: 8px; padding:5px; width:90%; font-size:100%; border: 1px solid #20BF9F;" align="center"
Ok. What should I do to have a single account? If this is the best solution for better functioning of the database and not create problems for other users will. Also because so far the changes I made and maybe continue to do will focus on rumors regarding Italy. I've noticed that sometimes there are discrepancies and errors in some cases between the Italian voices and their voices translated into English. I hope it is considered a useful work from the community.
|-
]
|rowspan=4|]
:I followed ] and it worked perfectly. I think this is ]. — ] (]) 04:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
|style="text-align: center;" |{{large|''Seattle Misplaced Pages Day''}}<br/>
I have to apologize for something that i did, moved by the enthusiasm without thinking i put the draft of the Moto Guzzi Stelvio page without thinking that it was a translation work done by another. Is my personal motorcycle. Sorry again!!!!!!!]
''Saturday afternoon, January 11, from 1:00–4:30pm PT at the Capitol Hill Meeting Room at ] (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102)''
:looks like it got sorted out. You might want to read ], if you haven't already. ] (]) 13:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


] celebrates the anniversary of the founding of Misplaced Pages. This year we will observe Misplaced Pages Day with an ] to improve the ] and other articles important to ], such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].
==VFR1200==
Hi Brian,


'''→''Sign up at ]!''←'''
Thanks for your work wordsmithing the VFR1200 article. Sometimes it's hard to get perspective on things like tense when you read it yourself. It is probably still pretty far from GA but fortunately it is an article that can be covered thoroughly without having to be super long. If you have any suggestions for it maybe it could set style standards for other motorcycle articles to follow. I've mostly followed the conventions from automobile articles.


You can also read and add to the ].
''']'''<small><sup>]</sup></small> 16:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
:Hey no problem, I don't see this as "my" article at all (even though I ). Glad to pitch in. I haven't really looked at it as a ''gestalt'' for a while, I'll do so today and provide feedback on the article's talk page. -- ] (]) 16:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
::Opened discussion at ]. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. -- ] (]) 23:25, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


Please remember to check our ] each month for upcoming events.
==Merge discussion for ]==
|rowspan=4|]
] An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been proposed for a ] with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going {{ #if: Talk:Velocette MAC#Merge proposal: Velocette MAC (WD) into Velocette MAC |]|to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article}}, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ] (]) 08:37, 21 April 2013 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote -->
|}
<div style="text-align: center; font-size: x-small;">06:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from ], please remove your name from ].</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Peaceray@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Seattle/Invitees&oldid=1262356696 -->


== Re-review ]? == == Good article reassessment for ] ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

I did a lot of cleanup at ], so I didn't know if you wanted to take another look to see if it passes ]. I'm sort of hesitant because other than the Chicago Tribune link, the coverage is entirely local. It did screen at Sundance, but it didn't really get much attention there and it didn't win anything. I'm going to ask Schmidt to take a look at it, but I don't know that it passes notability guidelines even with the salvage attempt. It's kind of the "thin line" thing here. ]] 06:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

== Invitation to look at edits on ] ==

I see the article ] has been tagged for expert review since October 2012. As part of a process of drafting a revision of that article in ], I am contacting all Wikipedians who have edited that article since early 2009 for whom I can find a user talk page.

I have read all the diffs of all the edits committed to the article since the beginning of 2009 (since before I started editing Misplaced Pages). I see the great majority of edits over that span have been vandalism (often by I.P. editors, presumably teenagers, inserting the names of their classmates in charts of IQ classifications) and reversions of vandalism (sometimes automatically by ClueBot). Just a few editors have referred to and cited published ] on the topic of IQ classification. It is dismaying to see that the number of reliable sources cited in the article has actually declined over the last few years. To help the process of finding reliable sources for articles on psychology and related topics, I have been compiling a ] since I became a Wikipedian in 2010, and I invite you to make use of those sources as you revise articles on Misplaced Pages and to suggest further sources for the source on the talk pages of the source list and its subpages. Because the ] article has been tagged as needing expert attention for more than half a year, I have opened ] about how to fix the article, and I welcome you to join the discussion. The draft I have in ] shows my current thinking about a reader-friendly, well sourced way to update and improve the article. I invite your comments and especially your suggestions of reliable sources as the updating process proceeds. -- ] (], ]) 20:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

== Knot articles and WP:NOTHOWTO ==

Hello Brianhe! I noticed you've flagged several knot articles with WP:NOTHOWTO... Inarguably, most of the knot articles do in fact contain some howto information. There have been several discussions regarding this topic in various articles. The consensus in the past has been to apply ] in the case of knotting articles. The primary argument that has been used to establish previous consensus is that a complete article on a knot must include at least one tying method, preferably the simplest or most well-known, in order to properly cover the subject of the article. After ] I help to write ]. I do not intend to remove your NOTHOWTO tags myself, but please take a look at the above links and consider whether you agree WP:IAR can be applied.

Also, as covered in the ], any howto content in a knotting article should be kept as descriptive as possible. Inappropriate tone does often creep into the tying and usage sections. If you have specific concerns about particular passages let me know or (of course :) try to improve it yourself. Best regards, --] <small>(])</small> 16:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
:Has there been an effort to put the guides onto Wikibooks and link that from the articles? — ] (]) 16:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
::There appears to have been some non-trivial activity, as part of a larger work, at ]. But personally I have focused my efforts on WP knot articles and Commons stuff. There seems to have been consensus for a while that at least one basic tying method belongs in a complete WP knot article. I certainly agree that Wikibooks would be the appropriate place for inclusion of additional methods/techniques/etc. --] <small>(])</small> 17:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
:::I'll have to give this some consideration. ] is a good example of what's wrong -- this really looks like a HOWTO guide, there's no encyclopedic context or content in the section that would prompt me to accept ] in this case, and this section with its illustrations of several variants totally dominates the article. I mean really as it stands it's not about ''the knot'' but how to ''make the knot'' including how to dress the ends afterwards. Stipulating your suggestion that encyclopedic coverage requires an illustration of forming the knot, other articles I tagged like ] even tell ''how to untie'' the knot, or ], how is this justified? We've been down this road in technical topics covered by ] (e.g. tons of cleanup on ] e.g. , the article was a cruft-magnet and eventually it was deleted/merged) and my gut is to similarly leave the HOWTOs out of knot articles as per policy. — ] (]) 19:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
::::It's certainly how-to advice. When it comes to knots, can you describe them without instructions on how to tie them? I would allow that a list of tying steps is necessary, and one series of illustrations, but no more. Three sets of tying instructions, with three sets of illustrations, is beyond what is needed to describe and identify the knot. The excess should be removed. Somebody who want to use this material for a future Wikibooks page can find it in the edit history. --] (]) 02:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
:::::Been busy, but will try to respond this weekend. Thanks. --] <small>(])</small> 06:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
::::::While it is not necessarily the strongest justification for inclusion of howto material specifically, I challenge you to find more complete and well-researched freely available standalone knot articles than those listed ]. Since expanding and properly referencing these articles they have been remarkably stable and not subject to excessive additions of material that I believe NOTHOWTO is meant to curb. Perhaps I am biased, but I have to think that when a user types "constrictor knot" or "taut-line hitch" into Google and clicks on the Misplaced Pages link that comes up at the top they will be pleased with what they find all in one place. No app to buy, no barrage of ads, just the information they are very likely seeking. Knots are functional constructs and our readers are without doubt interested in their function. I guess I just ask you to consider whether an article would truly be improved by the removal of information rather than attempts to refactor.

::::::Regarding the specific comments on the ] and the "three sets of illustrations", that article represents a particularly troublesome case. The rolling hitch article, along with the related ], is actually used ] regarding combining of very closely related knots into single articles. Due to the historical vagaries surrounding the naming of these related knots (] ]) it is not feasible to reasonably decide which of the underlying knot variations belong under which names. Thus the reason for there being three tying methods shown in each of these articles is due to each of the articles actually covering three distinct knots. Before these changes there was confusion and several disagreements as to which was the "right" knot. By including the three common variants and appropriate references the articles were stabilized.

::::::And as a final general comment... I find it quite interesting, given the very ancient origins of the subject, the study of practical knots and their use remains a strangely unformalized field. The discourse of everyday knots, setting aside the actual ] (also in quite a primitive state), seems to fall somewhere between that of ] and ]. I have endeavored to keep original research out of the knot articles, which is actually difficult because much of the current progress being made in practical knotting is happening online in forums, blogs, etc. In cases of original research and/or people trying to promote "vanity knots", you will see I have removed content and proposed that articles be deleted.

::::::Thanks for your time pondering these knotty questions... --] <small>(])</small> 03:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
:::::::This is a conundrum and I will leave it to the project folks to sort out. The guidelines look reasonable though could be tightened up as Dennis suggested. I've done some minor tone cleanup on the two examples pointed out in my May 29 reply. — ] (]) 15:58, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

== Charles G. Smith ==

Hi Brianhe. Thank you for your work on the "]" and "]" articles and your related work. I feel that the best way to get ] to leave Misplaced Pages is to get both articles deleted. I left a note at ]. I've been busy lately and don't really want to do the work required to AfD the article, but if you like, feel free to do it. :) Cheers, &mdash;] (]) 18:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
:Funny you mention that. I was actually adding the AfD tag to PICS when I noticed yours had just appeared in the edit box! I think I'll leave the bio article alone for a bit to see what happens, but as-is, it stands as an unremarkable businessperson who also happens to be an amateur weightlifter. Maybe leaving it that way is a ] than deleting it. — ] (]) 18:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

==TemplateData==
Hey Brianhe

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the ] on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small ] data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide ], along with a ], although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the ] page.

Thanks, ] (]) 21:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

== 1074 -> 1048 ==

Your ranking userbox is out of date, ].
Feel free to delete this post after you update.
:Danke - ] (]) 14:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

== You made a kitten proud ==

]
This kitten is running around telling all its friends what an impressive Wikipedian you are. Look at that happy kitten. You did this. Congrat.
] (]) 12:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>


== Wikidata issues ==
Firstly, I do not have access (where I work) to wikidata, secondly, the manual system is still accepted because robots do the hit later. If you want to continue reversing, feel free, I'm linking article that I create in PT to EN. graciously. ] (]) 18:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
:Apologies, I got confused as I was working on two wikidata issues at the same time and didn't understand you were creating the PT article. No harm no foul, I hope. Cheers -- ] (]) 18:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks, can you insert this articles: ], ], ] on WD? Rather than just reverse? ] (]) 18:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
:::There will come a day that will edit from home, and that problems will end. Thanks for the help, good contributions. ] (]) 18:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
::::Tx, all links you gave me have been added. -- ] (]) 19:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

== Bimota HB1 page? ==
Hi, I don't know if there is a way to cite the HB1 CB400F information. I can give you my personal information, but the HB1 stuff is so rare that I'm not sure if there is much of a way to really cite specific stuff. I know the bike exists, because I own it. I inherited it from my dad, we were planning on building it but he unexpectedly passed away in February 2009. Have you ever seen pictures of an HB1 kit unbuilt? Did it look like this:
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb103/moostrength/motorcycles/1OurMotorcycles/Bimota/HPIM0934.jpg

IF so, I took that picture at my parents house about 10 years ago, it was one of many bikes my father owned.

I know that my father went to Milan for a motorcycle show in 2008, and apparently when he met up with the people at Bimota's booth, they brought some of the senior executives over, and were using translators for my dad since he didn't speak Italian and their English was broken.

I'm not super familiar with the Misplaced Pages protocol per se, but I would like to cite the information if possible, I'm just not sure if there's a way to do so. Short of putting up what I have on the HB1 itself on my own website (which seems kind of circular to me) I don't think there really is anything out there on it. Also I've tried to stay on topic here, I read wikipedia's comments about protocol, but is there a way we can chat outside of wikipedia? I have some background information on this bike as well as others that might help too, but it is not specific to this particular issue so I didn't want to go into great detail.
] (]) 10:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
:I'm not sure what to tell you, Moo, because ] like your own web site aren't accepted references for Misplaced Pages. It's all about reliable, published sources, not first-hand information, ]. One thing you could do is add your sources and info to the Bimota talk page and see if other editors want to pick it up to incorporate into the article. — ] (]) 19:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hrm. Well, I suppose it's worth mentioning that I've talked with a producer of Cafe Racer, the TV show on Velocity channel about the bike. I know the HB1 is extremely rare, even though the CB400F doesn't carry probably the monetary value at least of what an HB1 750F would run. Their producer told me if they do a 5th season (they're in season 3 now) then they would very likely do an episode on the bike since it's probably the last CB400F HB1 in existence that's unbuilt. I don't think there's another HB1 CB400F in America, I know there used to be one up in Canada, and there's one in Japan, I've got correspondence from the guy from when my father was still alive, and I've seen the same 35mm pictures I have on the web elsewhere. If I can find the cite that posted the CB400F version could I use that as a cite (and any others) or does it have to be a bonafide website like something from cycle guide, motorcyclist, etc? It's pretty obvious looking at a CB400F picture versus a CB750F picture and telling the difference, the engine size for one is significantly different, and I know I've seen that Japanese version on the web before.
Just out of curiosity, do you have an HB1 and/or a Bimota?] (]) 08:58, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
:I'm on a device without a keyboard just now, so must be brief. Nope I've never been a Bimota owner, just Honda for a few years and currently a Ducati superbike rider. I hope that the Cafe Racer piece comes together, it sounds like it would make an interesting episode. Using a magazine's website as a source for Misplaced Pages is fine. Just not fan pages that are considered ]. the exception to this is someone who's considered an expert in his own right, say, ]. ] (]) 18:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

== Removal the offending and defamatory content. ==

According to personal recommendation from Ms. Rubina Kwon rkwon@wikimedia.org I'm hereby to request the removal of innapropriate content from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pegasus_Intellectual_Capital_Solutions

In expectation of your prompt compliance.

Regards. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 22:53, 1 January 2025

HomeBarnstars, Badges, & User Boxes Barnstars, Badges, & User BoxesTalk to me Talk to meCreations Creations
Archiving icon
Archives

Category:Writers from Pasco, Washington has been nominated for merging

Category:Writers from Pasco, Washington has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lost in Quebec (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

deleted

On your creations page, it says that an article was deleted. It is currently blue-linked. Is that your article? Alexeyperlov 17:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

If you're referring to Yanet García, it looks like it was re-created by another editor. To confirm, open this link and scroll down to line 559. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Editors (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Editors (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Editors (novel) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Home grow

Information icon Hello, Bri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Home grow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Category:Set designers has been nominated for merging

Category:Set designers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Manual publishing is always a pain in the ass -- thank you for getting it out. jp×g🗯️ 10:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

JPxG Yes, it's a dreary copy-paste fest! Here's hoping whatever's wrong with the script is simple to correct. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Seattle Misplaced Pages Day, January 11, 2025

Seattle Misplaced Pages Day

Saturday afternoon, January 11, from 1:00–4:30pm PT at the Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Branch Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102)

Misplaced Pages Day celebrates the anniversary of the founding of Misplaced Pages. This year we will observe Misplaced Pages Day with an edit-a-thon to improve the Seattle and other articles important to WikiProject Seattle, such as History of Seattle, Puget Sound, Lake Union, Lake Washington, Pioneer Square, Seattle Center, Tacoma, and University of Washington.

Sign up at Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Seattle/Wikipedia Day 2025!

You can also read and add to the task list.

Please remember to check our Seattle meetup schedule each month for upcoming events.

06:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Good article reassessment for Honda Super Cub

Honda Super Cub has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)