| Revision as of 15:16, 3 June 2006 editGDP (talk | contribs)226 edits →List of participants← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:22, 21 August 2020 edit undoCalliopejen1 (talk | contribs)Administrators132,969 edits boldly redirecting to wikiprojectTag: New redirect | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #redirect ] | |||
| <div style="padding:3px; background:AliceBlue; border: solid 1px #9966CC; color:blue; text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; margin-bottom:5px;margin-top:0;margin-left:-5px;margin-right:-4px;">Romanian Wikipedians' notice board </div> | |||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px #9966CC; background-color: AliceBlue;"> | |||
| {| | |||
| ! style="background:#000000" | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| </div> | |||
| '''Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedians' notice board!''' This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for ] editors - and editors interested in ]-related articles - to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under its relevant category. | |||
| {{To do}} | |||
| {{RWNBs}} | |||
| ], ] | |||
| ], ] | |||
| ==Links== | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| ==News and announcements== | |||
| ===Vlach-Bulgarian Rebellion=== | |||
| ]---A dispute popped off here between Bogdan & Alexander 007 on one side and an anonymous Bulgarian on the other. See ]. No compromise of the accepted facts is to be allowed. | |||
| ] 10:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Conservative Party=== | |||
| In ] there is: | |||
| * (Romanian) | |||
| If it is unaffiliated, what is it doing there? I found its web site unilluminating on even its stance toward the party (at least in the three minutes I gave it), or whether its politics were similar to those of the party, other than falling under the broad heading of "conservative". I'm guessing that someone on the ground in Romania will be familiar with the group and have an informed opinion on whether the link belongs. - ] | ] 06:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Problem articles=== | |||
| This is an incomplete list of articles where conflicts involving Romanian interests have occured, or which have involved Romanian Wikipedians (add any others): | |||
| *] and ] - you GOT to READ these ! | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *<s>]</s> Rezolvat/Resolved | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *<s>]</s> Rezolvat/Resolved | |||
| *] Problems continue (I've requested the article to be blocked until the major issues are resolved. --] <sup>(])</sup>) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] vs ] | |||
| *], User ] is inserting some text suspected of original research ((s)he has been contributing to the article before). | |||
| == Projects == | |||
| ''Advertise or ask for assistance for your Romanian-related Wiki projects'' | |||
| ===40.000 new articles=== | |||
| Dictionarul Enciclopedic Român aparut la editura politica Bucuresti 1962-1967 are in conformitate cu legea drepturilor de autor valabila pana in 1994 (cred), drepturile de autor expirate din 1987. In consecinta se poate face ceva similar cu enciclopedia britanica 1911.] | |||
| :Good ideea. Not bad. But who has time and patience to translate so much amount? Some articles related to Romania are very welcomed indeed. ] ] 21:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Bonaparte has a valid point. Maybe we should use them in the rowiki then first?] 22:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: The point is that somone with an scanner and an OCR software shall start the project. | |||
| But please consider that the images are not mandatory to be translated:)] | |||
| : From the Romanian copyright law: | |||
| ::''Durata drepturilor patrimoniale asupra operelor colective este de 70 de ani de la data aducerii operelor la cunostinta publica.'' | |||
| : So, since the copyright for collective works is valid 70 years after the publishing, it is still protected for another 27 years. ] 22:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : From the Romanian copyright law 1956, (legea 8 din 1996 nu cred ca poate modifica retroactiv drepturile de autor.) | |||
| No law can be applied retroactive. | |||
| Art. 7. - In cazurile aratate mai jos, autorul nu are folosinta drepturilor patrimoniale decit: | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| a) pe termen de 20 ani de la aparitia operei cu privire la cei care alcatuiesc enciclopedii, dictionare si culegeri;<br> | |||
| b) pe termen de 10 ani de la aparitie cu privire la autorul unei serii de fotografii artistice; <br> | |||
| c) pe termen de 5 ani de la aparitie cu privire la autorul de fotografii artistice separate.<br> | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| http://www.cdep.ro/pls/legis/legis_pck.htp_act_text?idt=8999 | |||
| Deci conform legii vechi, drepturile de autor au cam expirat inainte de intrarea in vigoare a legii noi adica in 1982-1987. Dar daca este cineva care a facut dreptul poate ne poate lamuri. | |||
| ] | |||
| Dar situatia din punct de vedere al legii internationale eu o vad oarecum similara cu cea a rusilor care nu au drepturi de autor pe perioada in care legea nu prevedea acest lucru. | |||
| mai ales ca articolul 8 spune: | |||
| Art. 8. - La expirarea termenelor prevazute la art. 6 si 7 sau, in lipsa de mostenitori, din momentul mortii autorului, dreptul patrimonial de autor se stinge. | |||
| : I don't know. In some countries, the copyright laws applied retroactively. See for example, the ] in the European Union. | |||
| :: ''Unlike some other copyright term extension acts, this act retroactively restored copyright to works that had fallen into the public domain in their source countries (see grandfathering).'' | |||
| : ] 12:23, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Legea 8/1996: | |||
| :: ''se abroga Decretul nr. 321 din 21 iunie 1956 privind dreptul de autor, cu modificarile - ulterioare, precum si orice alte dispozitii contrare.'' | |||
| : ] 12:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Corect. Se abroga incepand din 1996. Ceea ce inseamna ca pana in 1996 a fost valabila, ceea ce inseamna ca drepturile de autor au expirat in 1982.] 12:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Daca ar fi asa pentru orice articol copiat si distribuit in perioada 1982-1995 am putea comite o infractiune conform legii din 1996. Ceea ce nu este in regula. | |||
| Puten folosi aceste imagini scanate de mine dintr-o carte din 1987? --] 13:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Anittas, uite ce zice decretul 321/1956 in articolele 14 si 15: (sub incidenta caruia se afla imaginea din 1987) | |||
| '' Art. 14. - Sint permise fara consimtamintul autorului si fara plata vreunei remuneratii respectindu-se insa celelalte drepturi ale acestuia: | |||
| c) publicarea, chiar integrala a operelor literare, muzicale sau stiintifice ori reproducerea operelor de arta plastica in manuale didactice, cursuri universitare, culegeri sau alte asemenea lucrari destinate invatamintului, cu exceptia operelor care au fost comandate special in acest scop si pentru care autorul pastreaza dreptul de remuneratie; | |||
| e) extrase de mica intindere din opere literare, muzicale, cinematografice ori stiintifice, sau reproduceri, precum si '''prezentari cu ajutorul aparatelor optice a unor opere de arta plastica, servind exclusiv ca document explicativ pentru continutul scris sau vorbit in conferinte sau publicatii cu caracter stiintific, in lucrari de critica ori in darile de seama asupra expozitiilor publice, sau pentru popularizarea acestor opere prin radio si televiziune'''; | |||
| h) '''reproducerea operelor de arta plastica in filme, diafilme sau prin televiziune cu titlu de informare sau de prezentare accesorie.''' | |||
| j) '''fotografierea, copierea si reproducerea in orice mod a unei opere de arta plastica, daca aceasta nu se valorifica.''' | |||
| Art. 15. - In cazul folosirii operelor conform art. 13 si 14, trebuie sa se indice opera originala, numele autorului acesteia, al traducatorului sau al autorului operei derivate prevazute la art. 10, iar la operele de arta plastica trebuie sa se indice si locul unde se gaseste originalul precum si numele celui care a efectuat copia. '' | |||
| Altfel zis, poti s-o lasi pe Wiki linistit daca precizezi sursa si autorul. ] 14:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Nu-i adevărat. Imaginea din 1987 se află sub incidenţa legii valabile în momentul actual, care nu are o asemenea prevedere. ] 14:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Legile nu se aplica retroactiv in Ro, deci e imposibil sa fie sub incidenta celei din 1996. ] 14:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Mersi, Dune! --] 14:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Daca conform legii vechi dreptul de autor expira in 1997, atunci din 1996 a intrat sub incidenta legii noi, pentru ca dreptul de autor nu expirase, daca dreptul a expirat in 1992 atunci este PD din 1992. Parerea mea..] | |||
| Dear all, even such things like copyright laws are of interest to the community. Besides, speaking non-English is simply impollite. Please, stick to English, when possible as Polish, Rushian and Ukrainian editors do on the other boards. Thanks, --] 03:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : The short of it is that the massive Communist-era Dictionarul Enciclopedic Romîn fell out of copyright under the old, rather minimal Communist-era copyright law, and they are trying to work out if new, extended copyright laws apply. If I follow the above correctly (I haven't read it closely) anything that was still under copyright when the new, stricter laws came into effect is covered, but once something passed into the public domain, there is no turning back; I gather that the particular materials in question are now public domain, but not (for example) a photo from 1987, which gets the benefit of the new law. | |||
| :I should add that as far as I know, no one involved is a lawyer, and some comments are qualified with remarks like ''"Parerea mea"'' ("my opinion"). | |||
| : If I misstated anything in that summary, or missed anything significant, could someone please fill in? Thanks. -- ] | ] 11:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Hello again everybody! Can someone please summarize this long discussion (because I'm not sure if it is ok to use the said dictionary as source). Why I'm bringing this again? I've just realized that a newly created user (today), called ContinutLiber (FreeContent) seemed to have started the task of putting each and every article ((s)he started with the beginning: added some word starting with: "ab" (poor spelling, no diacritics, not really knowing how wiki works etc.) But I would like what to do: wikify entries or remove them as copyvio? Thank you in advance for enlightening me. --]|] 22:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| According to (Romanian), dictionaries and encyclopedias published before 1984 '''are''' in the public domain. The author of the article claims that this is certified even by ORDA, the Romanian Copyright Office. ] ] 10:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ====Resources==== | |||
| http://www.biblioteca.ase.ro/ResurseElectronice/carte/download.aspx?id=38 | |||
| ===Magyarization and Romanianization=== | |||
| I don't know how many of you noticed these two articles (] and ]). I suppose most of you will think the same I did: both articles are biased currently twards the hungarian POV. I think these articles need our / your help. | |||
| The articles are preseting almost the same POV as virulent irredentist websites such as hungarian-history(dot)hu --] 10:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Editors are needed on this topic. There are some new Greater Hungary guys that edit everything according to stuff like this: Raffay Ernő: A vajdaságoktól a birodalomig-Az újkori Románia története = From voivodates to the empire-History of modern Romania, JATE Kiadó, Szeged, 1989 | |||
| :: I know many of you don't like to be called "nationalists", but just imagine you're dealing with the Hungarian counterpart of Vadim Tudor. I'm not exaggerating. These guys don't even accept Hungarian government references. If they get me angry, I'll copy-paste here the volumes of Ion Lancranjan. | |||
| :: BTW, they also started editing ] along the same lines. ] 16:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Honestly, they have already made me angry, and on the Transylvania article I've tried to calm them down as much as I could. It is clear that the main agitator is ] (a name well chosen for his purpose) and as you can see he has only edited on articles related to Transylvania, Bucovina and bout hungarians in these regions. As Bogdan said it well most of his edits are nationalistic hungarian bullshit, and I hope more users can keep an eye on him. ] -<sup>]</sup> 17:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Are the issues solved now? --] 15:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| === Voronet, Sucevita === | |||
| Images of the painted monasteries would be very useful. --] 04:40, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I have uploaded a picture of Suceviţa at ]. There is, however, no article that I found about this monastery. It is not linked from ]. I've also placed a picture of ] in that respective article. ]] ''']''' ] 21:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| === Transnistria, Moldova === | |||
| These two pages have come under an intense barrage from various users who want to push their own ideologies. Of course this problem has always existed for these two pages, however I have never seen it escalate to such a level or become so unilateral. Any help will be appreciated. ] 17:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :How about reading the proposed plan for peace of President Basescu? --] 14:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Debate == | |||
| ''Debate anything related directly, or indirectly, to Romania - but take it to the discussion Page'' | |||
| == Off-topic discussion == | |||
| ''Anything goes (on the discussion page)'' | |||
| == List of participants == | |||
| #] 17:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] ]<small> & </small>] 17:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 18:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 18:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] | ] 19:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 19:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 19:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 20:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 15:29 (Eastern), 4 December 2005 | |||
| #] 21:11, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 22:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #]] ''']''' ] 00:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 03:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 05:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 05:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 06:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] | ] 09:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 13:27, 5 December 2005 (CET) | |||
| #] | |||
| #] 23:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 06:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 22:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 22:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 11:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 01:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| # ] 18:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 00:15, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 8:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 23:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 21:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 08:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #] 15:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 15:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 18:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 02:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 21:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 12:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 20:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] 15:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 06:22, 21 August 2020
Redirect to: