Revision as of 15:20, 1 August 2013 editAvdav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,391 editsm →Edit warring← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:27, 15 April 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(30 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Welcome! == | |||
'''Welcome!''' | |||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, especially what you did for ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> Consider joining the ] Let me know if you need any help. - ] (]) 13:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
== You are now a Reviewer == | == You are now a Reviewer == | ||
] | ] | ||
Hello. Your account has been granted the " |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|1=reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to ] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a ] scheduled to end 15 August 2010. | ||
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only ], similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at ]. | Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only ], similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at ]. | ||
Line 21: | Line 8: | ||
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> ] (]) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC) | If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> ] (]) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
==] of ]== | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this ''']''' will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article. | |||
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Robert Zebelyan|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // ] :: ] </b></span> 13:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
== Edit warring == | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // ] :: ] </b></span> 13:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
Your recent edits at ] and {{tl|Infobox Armenians}} show that you're enganged in an ]. And announcements like are really counterproductive too. If you don't have time to discuss controversial edits, then please don't make such edits at all. It's as simple as that. You have been asked to discuss the matter at the ANI noticeboard or the relevant talk pages, but you chose not to do so. Please note that all topics related to Armenia (and Azerbaijan) broadly construed may be subject to ] as set out in ] by the Arbitration Committee. The decision there says explicitely that "edit warring is harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum." If you keep reverting other editors at these two pages without dicussing the desired change, you will be blocked from editing. ] (]) 14:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
:My intention of editing was related with reducing the amount of notable Armenians, since there is no strictly defined rule which needs to be followed when adding someone to the list. So, I removed less significant (in my opinion) persons. Because hardly someone in the world had ever heard about, f.e. Vazgen Sargsyan. In any case, if this somehow violates policies or is considered as a harmful action, I do express my sincere apologies. ] (]) 14:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
::And what is keeping you away from getting engaged in discussions? If you don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen Sargsyan, let's discuss it. I don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen I. Don't you think "hardly someone in the world had ever heard about" also applies to him? --] ] 15:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Well, as I already said before, I have no sufficient time to fight my point of view, if you think Vazgen Sargsyan deserves to be in the list instead of Vazgen I, keep him untouchable. |
Latest revision as of 15:27, 15 April 2023
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Robert Zebelyan
The article Robert Zebelyan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Misplaced Pages policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. // Timothy :: talk 13:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Robert Zebelyan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Zebelyan is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Robert Zebelyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.