| Revision as of 03:55, 7 August 2013 editPmaster12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,815 editsm →Comments← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:55, 13 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,446 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:The Writer 2.0/Archive 2) (bot | ||
| (56 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| {{Archive box|search=yes|]<br/>}} | {{Archive box|search=yes|]<br/>}} | ||
| == 20:20:38, 29 July 2016 review of submission by 72.67.56.38 == | |||
| == Speedy deletion == | |||
| {{Lafc|username=72.67.56.38|ts=20:20:38, 29 July 2016|declined=Draft:My_Fighting_Season}} | |||
| Can you delete ]? | |||
| ] (]) 23:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Following up on NFLPA Game == | |||
| Hello Writer (if I can call you that), I just wanted to follow up with you and see if you still thought you'd be able to look at the mess that is ''']'''. It's been pretty challenging to find an editor to help out with this, so if you do have time, it would be very much appreciated. For convenience, my two proposed replacement drafts can be found at the bottom of ]. Cheers, ] (] · ]) 16:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I've been busy but I have some time over the next few days so I'll give them a look through. You're welcome to call me that or whatever you want to! -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Your RFPP request == | |||
| I'm requesting help in the reasons why my article is being rejected. The last message was there were not enough references. I added references and was rejected again. Is there now something I should delete such as the official website? I have used other television shows and films as a template/reference and they had the same type of articles and websites. | |||
| Hi there. I just declined your RFPP request, because we don't usually protect pages preemptively. However, I do think we need to do something about all of the non-notable articles. I'm thinking we should maybe nominate them at ], but if there are a lot of them it may be a better fit for one of the admin noticeboards. Could you make a list of the articles that Pmaster12 has made that you think fail ]? I think it will be easier to judge the next step after we've done that. Best — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 07:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I've compiled a list below with articles I have found to be of questionable notability. I have included those of ] who I believe is another account Pmaster has been using (see ]: there is a one minute difference with Pmaster and the IP making consecutive edits). There was a separate IP (whom I believe is unrelated) who created several new articles back earlier in the year and I have included those articles as well. | |||
| Please advise. | |||
| ::*]: ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| ::*]: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
| Jo Haskin | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| ::*]: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ::::Thanks for drawing up the list. I've decided to ask for advice at the administrators' noticeboard - you can find the thread ]. — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 05:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 00:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I've closed down the thread, as we already had a good number of suggestions. Personally, I'd be inclined to go with Blackmane's suggestion - choose three articles from the list above that you are relatively sure should be deleted, and make a group nomination at AfD. It would be a good idea to link to this discussion or to the AN discussion when you do this. We can work out what to do with the other articles after people have had some time to discuss the initial batch. Does this sound like a good way forward to you? — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 20:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I have no complaints. I'll start the nomination shortly. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:36, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Comments == | |||
| I understand that but what meant was that if there are someone locally or anyplace they are trying to find an individual to read or do a project that's all. Also if really trying to accomplish something here, the ] roster navbox is not the only one with all their players biographies no no. Take a look all around. I can name one the ] roster navbox and their are probably others too. So don't look at certain articles, look around that's all I was trying to just to make sure you are not targeting me and my work on articles. That's all. The reason why I have not said nothing because I did not understand what's issue is all about bottomline is I didn't think it was an issue. I'm sorry for the late response and thanks for let me know what your concerns were. Again sorry for the misunderstanding. ] (]) 22:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I was just saying I'm doing the best I can but I understand your concerns and about the polices. I trying to attack anybody I just felt I had to defend myself a little bit because I know other editors have articles that are below standard or above standard. So I understand you and other users are trying to make things right. But I'll continue to try my best. ] (]) 03:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:55, 13 November 2024
| This is The Writer 2.0's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
20:20:38, 29 July 2016 review of submission by 72.67.56.38
- 72.67.56.38 (talk · contribs)
Hello,
I'm requesting help in the reasons why my article is being rejected. The last message was there were not enough references. I added references and was rejected again. Is there now something I should delete such as the official website? I have used other television shows and films as a template/reference and they had the same type of articles and websites.
Please advise.
Sincerely, Jo Haskin
Good article reassessment for New York Jets
New York Jets has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)