| Revision as of 01:00, 4 June 2006 editUniverseToday (talk | contribs)67 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:09, 29 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{{nosubst|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|User talk| |{{error:not substituted|indefblockeduser}}]<div style="display:none;">}}}}} | |||
| {{welcome}} ] ] 00:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="padding:5px;" | |||
| Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Misplaced Pages. ] a vehicle for ] or a mere collection of ]. You are, however, ] to the encyclopedia. See the ] to learn more. Thanks. <!-- Template:Spam --> ] ] 00:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | | ] | ||
| |width="100%"| '''This user has been ] from editing Misplaced Pages, per ruling of ], ] and/or the ].<span class="plainlinks"> <small>See .</small></span>'''<br><span class="plainlinks"><small>(toolbox: ] • • )</small></span> | |||
| Sorry! Can you please read my addition to this page. | |||
| |} | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Fraser_Cain | |||
| {{{nosubst|{{#if:{{{history|}}}|]|}}}}} | |||
| Nobody seems to have read it. | |||
| {{{nosubst|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|User talk| |</div>}}}}}<!-- Template:Indefblockeduser --> | |||
| ] 00:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)UT | |||
| For discussion prior to August 2006, see ]. | |||
| Somebody edited that link changing fraser_cain to Frasie_Crane. I've changed it back. | |||
| == Request for investigation == | |||
| I've posted a ] regarding your incessant linkspamming. I'm noticing you so you can post whatever you think would be appropriate in your defense. - ] <small><font color="green">(]/]/])</font></small> 03:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Response == | |||
| Why are there external link sections in most of the articles if nobody is allowed to add links or "linkspam" as you obnoxiously like to describe it? Every link I have added is relevant and useful. Investigate away but I think most Wikipedians have better things to do with their time than pick on newcomers over such silly claims. I do not have to provide a defence as I have done nothing wrong. If I am guilty of some sort of breach in Wikiquette by adding links then I daresay most Wikipedians are also guilty and the charge must be expanded to include just about everyone. Your obsession with nitpicking on such an order of magnitude is reflective of your article quality. You would never get published in any respectable magazine requiring talent so you choose to make yourself feel a big man by repudiating others. In short you need to get a life and possibly a girlfriend. | |||
| In summary, no rules have been broken and nobody has been hurt. This is just a time wasting exercise. While cruising around getting the feel of the place I contributed links to a few pages. Now I am starting to write articles. I hope the investigators will treat this churlish claim by Reaverdrop with the contempt and ridicule it so thoroughly deserves. In the time I have wasted responding to this person I could have made headway into my second article. Now I'm not sure I'll even bother. No doubt I will have to go undo the vandalism commited by this guy. ] 06:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I'm sure it's upsetting to be called into question like this, but I believe your tone is entirely inappropriate. See ] and ]. Please desist. --] 06:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Writing has no tone. It can bring about revolutions and topple nations but it never has a tone. I apologise about the personal remarks. They were uncalled for. But so was the term "linkspamming". Nobody likes being accused of something they haven't done. Adding links is not a crime. Wasting peoples time is. ] 06:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please stop promoting your own sites on pages like this. Also, personal attacks in edit comments are still personal attacks. --] 06:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Let me get this straight. You don't think that RobertZubrin.com is an appropriate link for a page entitled Robert Zubrin? Please explain. It should be both interesting and amusing. I might write an article about it. But not at Misplaced Pages. How is it relevant that I own the domain? It could belong to Donald Duck and it would still be relevant to the page. It is absurd to claim otherwise. Why would it be ok for somebody else to post a link and not me? Why am I wasting time explaining what should be patent commonsense? ] 06:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| That's correct. I believe your relentless self-promotion is inappropriate; see ] and ]. If others think your links useful they will add them. They haven't, which should tell you something. --] 06:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It tells me that people who know nothing write nothing. Who else would add it but a space enthusiast who owns space domains? You didn't answer any of my questions so I won't answer any more of yours. Let the authorities work it out then. Tribunal time I think. Goodbye. | |||
| : Errrmmm... OK then. | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| : | |||
| {| class="user-block" | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. are the reverts in question. ] 07:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| == accusations == | |||
| In reference to edit you made to my user talk page I would like to kindly request you refrain from accusing me of vandalism and/or sockpuppetry without hard evidence to back it up. I expect not to see such wild accusations from you on my user talk page or anywhere else or I will report it to the administrators of Misplaced Pages.--] 14:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| In reference to your childish accusation of linkspamming I would like to kindly request you refrain from accusing me without hard evidence to back it up. I expect not to see such wild accusations from you on my user talk page or anywhere else or I will report it to the administrators of Misplaced Pages. ] 00:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked this account indefinitely as a ] of ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Big deal. ] 01:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:09, 29 May 2022
|
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See block log. (toolbox: contributions • page moves • current autoblocks) |
For discussion prior to August 2006, see Archive.