Misplaced Pages

Free Congress Foundation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:46, 13 August 2013 editSplin--ter21 (talk | contribs)43 editsm →Origin← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:28, 28 July 2018 edit undoNarky Blert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers417,477 editsm ce 
(35 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Free Congress Foundation''' may refer to:
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2012}}
* ], founded by Paul Weyrich, which was a leading conservative voice in US Christian communities for several decades
{{Infobox non-profit
* ], a continuation of the above under new leadership that focuses on economic policies
| name = Free Congress Foundation
{{disambiguation}}
| image = ]
| caption =
| founder = ]
| type = ] non-profit
| tax_id =
| registration_id =
| founded_date = 1977<ref>mediamouse.org, </ref>
| location = ]
| coordinates = <!-- {{Coord|LAT|LON|display=inline,title}} -->
| origins =
| key_people = ]
| area_served =
| products =
| services =
| focus =
| mission =
| method =
| revenue =
| endowment =
| num_volunteers =
| num_employees =
| num_members =
| subsid =
| owner =
| motto =
| former name =
| homepage = {{URL|freecongress.org}}
| dissolved =
| footnotes =
}}

The '''Free Congress Foundation''' (formally the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation, Free Congress, or FCF), is a ] ] founded by ]. It was based near Capitol Hill in ]. for most of its history but is now based in Alexandria, VA. Since Paul Weyrich's death in 2008 the Foundation has been headed by former governor of Virginia, Jim Gilmore. Under Gilmore's leadership the Free Congress Foundation has been focused on economic issues and not social issues.

==Origin==
]
In the 1960s and 1970s, the labor union-backed ] was highly influential. In 1974, in part to counteract its influence, Weyrich founded the Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress (CSFC), whose name implied that the ] should stop being dominated by labor and other liberal-leaning interest groups.

The CSFC was organized as a ] organization focused on elective politics. It had some success and was a pioneer in political ] fundraising. It complemented in a respect the activities of the ], which Weyrich had also co-founded, which researched tax and regulatory issues. However, Weyrich wanted an organization that would focus on conservative social values.

The CSFC thus became a non-profit ] organization, the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation. It also has a sister organization, Coalitions for America, which, as a ], is permitted to lobby, and a ], the Free Congress PAC, that is permitted to directly endorse and contribute to political candidates. The name "Free Congress" no longer directly refers to an effort to free Congress from liberal influence; it is now the equivalent of a brand name that has outgrown its origin and refers only to the organization that bears it.

==Activist training==
Since its inception, FCF has trained conservatives in basic techniques of activism and election campaigns.

In 2001, the Foundation published ], an activist strategic plan which called for a new approach to activism and the creation of conservative parallel institutions as a counter to existing institutions, which it argued were dominated by the Left.<ref name="web.archive.org"> FreeCongressFoundation.org, July 2001. Via Internet Archive.</ref>

==Krieble Institute==
Another initiative taken on by the foundation was the training of anti-communists in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. This Institute bore the name of ], the primary donor to these activities.

Through the Krieble Institute, "Bob produced the first political commercials ever run on Ukrainian television. They promoted Ukrainian independence. And when 89 percent of the voters agreed with that message, their democratic will drove the last nail into the Soviet coffin."<ref>Mike Pence, June 7, 2004, ], </ref>

==Privacy==
The foundation's Center for Technology Policy and Coalition for Constitutional Liberties has opposed the ], ], a ] and other measures often supported by conservatives for fighting crime, terrorism and ].

==Judicial nominations==
FCF has been involved in the judicial nominations battles since the early 1980s. Its Center for Law and Democracy and its Coalition for Judicial Restraint have criticized Republican Senators for not being aggressive enough in blocking liberal nominees or in confirming certain conservatives. The CLD has also researched and publicized information about nominees' decisions and writings, either to attack or defend them.

The FCF has promoted what it sees as a philosophy of judicial restraint, in which judges largely defer to the elected branches of government on controversial political and cultural decisions. The individual most closely associated with this philosophy-and the chief exponent for the Free Congress Foundation's views on this subject for many years-is ], who has made numerous appearances on television and radio, as well as in both print and online media, supporting conservative judicial nominations put forward by the Bush administration and conversely, opposing what he considered liberal nominees chosen by the previous Clinton administration.

==Cultural conservatism==
{{See also|Cultural conservatism}}
] festival in 1969.]]

FCF played a founding role in galvanizing religious conservative political activism. By the late 1990s, Weyrich declared that social conservatives were no longer a majority having a liberal agenda forced on them by an elite but rather are a dwindling minority that have lost control over the culture; that traditional culture and the ] have traded places. He acknowledged the need for continued political involvement as a matter of self-defense but stated that politics could not restore traditional values or, in his views, hopeless efforts to recapture institutions such as prestige media, academia and mainline churches that had been lost to the ].

Instead he urged conservatives to invest their time and money in alternative institutions, which would, in his viewpoint, eventually become the norm due to the superior efficacy of traditional values. This sparked a firestorm of criticism from other conservatives, who accused Weyrich of giving up.

FCF has also been willing to spark controversy on other fronts. It rejects what it calls ], dubbing it "]" and blaming it on the ] of left-wing thinkers (]). Accordingly, it has been more willing than many other conservative groups to endorse or entertain views that some on the left would consider offensive and evidence of bigotry. It is arguably hostile to Islam as a whole, rather than confining its criticism to ]. With regard to ], in his column of April 13, 2001 (]) titled ''Indeed, He is Risen!,'' Weyrich argued that "Christ was crucified by the Jews.... He was not what the Jews had expected so they considered Him a threat. Thus He was put to death."

==Foreign policy and defense==
]
FCF took a hard-line anti-communist stance in the ], rejecting ] and ] and supporting efforts to overthrow communist governments. However, other than ] which it strongly backed, FCF did not fully endorse the ] program of spending on expensive weapon systems, a stance it continues to this day. It remains hostile to the ].

FCF has been friendlier to post-communist ] and ] than most contemporary conservatives. It was against US intervention in the Balkans, leaning more toward the Orthodox Christian ] than the ] and ].

While arguably against Islam, particularly to Muslim immigration to the West, and for racial and religious ] in anti-terrorist efforts, FCF has been more opposed to the worldwide ], and particularly the ], than other conservatives.

==Economics and trade==
FCF departs from other conservative institutions in endorsing a ] approach on ]. Furthermore, it is not as purely free-market, supporting government efforts in ] and privacy protection.

However, it also supports mainstream conservative views on ], calling for reduced spending and taxes.

==Broadcast efforts==
Weyrich promoted a view that the mainstream news and entertainment media exhibit a ]. In response, in 1993, FCF launched a Washington, D.C.-based satellite television station called National Empowerment Television (NET). Its logo featured a square of nine dots, referring to a ] that cannot be solved without drawing lines "]."

]
NET served in part as a platform for FCF and Weyrich's views and interests. For example, Weyrich was a supporter of rail and ] had a program on the channel called ''America on Track''; another program, ''The New Electric Railway Journal'', covered ]. Other programs focused on FCF activity: ''Endangered Liberties'' discussed ] issues; ''Legal Notebook'' emphasized judicial nominations, and ''Next Revolution'' covered FCF's take on ]. A popular program was ''Direct Line with Paul Weyrich'', in which the host interviewed lawmakers and other prominent figures live, permitted the public to call in directly with questions and comments and delivered a commentary in the final segment.

NET was also a broader resource for the conservative and free market movement. Many organizations bought the rights to air programs on the channel, including the ], the ], the ], ] and others.

The channel featured high production values and cost a great deal and in response to donor and investor pressure for a clear focus, FCF dropped all programs not directly related to public policy and conservative activism, and rebranded the channel as NET: The Conservative NewsTalk Network, with the initials NET no longer standing for anything and the nine-dot logo replaced with one evoking the US Capitol dome. It also began news reports and updates, and a full-fledged investigative journalism program.

FCF planned to make NET a self-sustaining, even profitable commercial enterprise, rather than a money-losing tool of outreach but was unsuccessful. In a decision he later came to regret bitterly, Weyrich turned over day-to-day operation of the channel to an industry veteran who had been successful with other startups. After a power struggle which Weyrich lost, NET was rebranded again into "America's Voice", and the channel abandoned all conservative identity, marketing itself merely as a non-ideological way for the public to make its views known to policymakers. FCF had to pay to retain its four programs on the channel and after controversy over their content, even those were removed. Viewer support collapsed, and ] dropped it. Eventually America's Voice was sold, becoming "The Renaissance Network" (TRN), airing on a few broadcast stations, mainly ] and low-power channels. Facing ruin, TRN brought back FCF content but it was too little, too late, and the channel folded.

FCF has also experimented with radio broadcasting, airing weekly taped programs on the Liberty Works Radio Network and other outlets.

Today, it offers interviews, soundbites and commentary readings on its website, FCF News on Demand,

==Center for Cultural Conservatism==
Part of the larger Free Congress Foundation, the Center for Cultural Conservatism is headed by ].

==See also==
* ]

==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}

==External links==
*
* from ]
* from ]
* from ]
*

]
]
]

Latest revision as of 10:28, 28 July 2018

Free Congress Foundation may refer to:

Topics referred to by the same term Disambiguation iconThis disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Free Congress Foundation.
If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Category: