| Revision as of 17:10, 6 September 2004 editMirv (talk | contribs)16,966 edits re ViP listings← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:58, 19 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (610 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Hey! == | |||
| Some past dialogs are saved in archives, here: | |||
| *http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Rex071404/archive1 | |||
| Hi friend, I was hoping you could tell me how to incorporate an image (like you've done) into the signature. Please write on my talk page! Thanks. ] '''<sup><small>]</small></sup>''' 06:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Rex, James isn't goading me into anything. I have been thinking about this section myself. It just can't handle the hundreds of articles & editorials out there. Now, a Lexis-Nexis search of titles clearly shows that a representative sample would be overwhelming pro-Kerry. So, I have no intention at all of letting you continue adding anti-Kerry links while holding back myself. That would provide a seriously distorted view of coverage. So, we can certainly get into a link-adding war, and you know perfectly well that I will do it and that I have more ammunition. But why go there? The section is basically pointless, and just stirs up trouble. I'm amazed you're not leaping at the chance to cut a pretty clearly pro-Kerry section (not POV, just reflective). I suspect that your resistance is because I suggested it, and you think it must therefore be biased. But, all I'm trying to do is make this article less troublesome, with no real sacrifice to its quality. What say ye?] 00:03, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ==] case== | |||
| Rex, | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| *I have every bit as much right to add links as you. If that's vandalism, then so is yours. | |||
| || ] | |||
| *This article is not the subject of arbcom procedings. If it were, you would already be banned. If you would like to motion to have it included, that would be fine with me. I have not the slightest concern about your threat anyway, as my actions are well within policy. | |||
| |} | |||
| *'Other' is not at all redundant. The point is that many,many news reports & editorials are referenced in the article. And so those sections are redundant. | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ]/] 05:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *I haven't even looked at the links you added. So, it's not the specific links that concern me. It's just that this section by it's very nature promotes link warring. You have added many links in the last few days. No one else has. That's because everyone else already thinks there are too many. I have restrained myself many times from adding links. Why should I, when you aren't? | |||
| *I truly believe it's a pointless section. | |||
| *It's not just you and me that have to agree on what articles to include. There are several others active, plus new editors drop in all the time. | |||
| == File:Nqlies2a.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| Ok, you want the links. I can't imagine why, truly. But, I'll go through and evaluate the specific articles & editorials. I may add some & I may request you to remove some. Seems to me like a lot of pointless work. But I'm willing to see if we can resolve this. If not, I'll call a vote requesting removal of the section on redundancy grounds.] 00:33, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] (]) 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Thinksay2a.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| :Well, I just said I'd have a look. The fact that I'm not even objecting to anything specific should make it clear to you that it's the section itself I find troublesome and not your specific links. I will tell you right now, without even looking, that I would find any links to nakedly partisan sites objectionable. | |||
| An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] (]) 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Nqlies.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| :As to the arbitrators, I have no worries and no plans to look. I find that whole page a frustrating distraction, and it's just going to have to proceed (or not) without my further attention. SBVT is not in the jurisdiction of the complaint, but even if it is, so what? I'm working on making this a good, fair article. If arbcom has a problem with my actions, I'll take whatever comes my way.] 01:00, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] (]) 22:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| ==Vandalism in progress== | |||
| ] Hello Rex071404! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure ], all biographies should be based on ]. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article: | |||
| This page is really only for ]; editing disputes don't belong there, which is why I removed your listing of Nysus. I see you used ], which is a good first step; if fruitful discussion still isn't forthcoming you should try ]—but please, not ]: listing non-vandals there only creates hard feelings and isn't at all helpful. ]] 17:10, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Gil Clancy}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 20:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''No evidence that this form is particularly ].''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 19:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hello== | |||
| Back to Misplaced Pages yet? ] (]) 20:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:58, 19 February 2023
Hey!
Hi friend, I was hoping you could tell me how to incorporate an image (like you've done) into the signature. Please write on my talk page! Thanks. Gautam 06:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/216.153.214.89 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Clubjuggle /C 05:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
File:Nqlies2a.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nqlies2a.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Thinksay2a.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thinksay2a.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Nqlies.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nqlies.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Rex071404! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 11 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Gil Clancy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of SF-180
The article SF-180 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence that this form is particularly notable.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello
Back to Misplaced Pages yet? 206.82.167.3 (talk) 20:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)