Revision as of 00:22, 5 September 2013 editNikkimaria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users232,593 edits →Tag: re← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:59, 5 January 2025 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,657,324 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|musician-work-group=y|musician-priority=Unknown|class=C|needs-photo=n|listas=Clark, Edward}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Clark, Edward|blp=no|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-work-group=y|musician-priority=Unknown}} |
|
{{WikiProject Classical music}} |
|
{{WikiProject Classical music}} |
|
|
}} |
|
{{DYK talk|28 February|2013|entry=... that ''']''' was the only British student of ], conducted the first British performance of his ], and invited him to conduct his '']'' for the ]?}} |
|
{{DYK talk|28 February|2013|entry=... that ''']''' was the only British student of ], conducted the first British performance of his ], and invited him to conduct his '']'' for the ]?}} |
|
|
|
|
Line 7: |
Line 9: |
|
A bit dim, but the best I can find. By all means replace if you find a better. ] (]) 12:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
A bit dim, but the best I can find. By all means replace if you find a better. ] (]) 12:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: Great work tracking it down and getting it scanned and uploaded, Tim. I know of only one better, a full-face professional portrait that's in the possession of Clark's son Conrad in Melbourne. If I had the remotest idea of how to get that image from there to here, I'd see if we could manage it. Maybe one day I'll join the 20th century. -- ] </sup></font>]] 08:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
: Great work tracking it down and getting it scanned and uploaded, Tim. I know of only one better, a full-face professional portrait that's in the possession of Clark's son Conrad in Melbourne. If I had the remotest idea of how to get that image from there to here, I'd see if we could manage it. Maybe one day I'll join the 20th century. -- ] </sup></span>]] 08:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tag == |
|
== Tag == |
Line 15: |
Line 17: |
|
::] is an editor I respect hugely, and I'll certainly wait a bit before pressing the Blitz button. ] (]) 21:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC) |
|
::] is an editor I respect hugely, and I'll certainly wait a bit before pressing the Blitz button. ] (]) 21:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC) |
|
:::Hey guys. IIRC, my concerns were mainly with the third para of the lead and the Resignation section - both seem a bit non-neutral to me, and the latter colloquial at times as well. But if the consensus is they're fine as-written, I have no problem with the tag being removed. ] (]) 00:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
|
:::Hey guys. IIRC, my concerns were mainly with the third para of the lead and the Resignation section - both seem a bit non-neutral to me, and the latter colloquial at times as well. But if the consensus is they're fine as-written, I have no problem with the tag being removed. ] (]) 00:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I see what you mean. Still, it seems to me that paragraph summarises detailed material from the main article, as a good ] should. I've seen many articles drained of any colour in the last two years through overly rigid application of well-meaning essays and guidelines; this is a big loss especially for biographies about colourful personages. -- ] (]) 06:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I support Michael's view completely, --] (]) 10:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC) |
I don't think I agree with the {{tone}} tag on the top of the article. I have just reread the article carefully and didn't spot anything that seemed unencyclopedic in tone. I'll leave this message here for a week or so, after which, unless any other editor objects in the meanwhile, I propose to delete the tag. Tim riley (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)