| Revision as of 06:06, 8 September 2013 editAnthony Appleyard (talk | contribs)209,150 edits →Technical requests: done 3 (1 needed histmerge), 1 was already done← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:26, 9 January 2025 edit undoBcp67 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers80,165 edits →Uncontroversial technical requests: add |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude> |
|
==Requesting technical moves== |
|
|
{{#ifeq: {{FULLPAGENAME}} | Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Technical requests | {{shortcut|WP:RMTR}} | {{shortcut|WP:RM/TR|WP:RMT}} }} |
|
|
If a desired move is uncontroversial and technical in nature (e.g. spelling and capitalization), or a revert of an undiscussed move where discussion is needed, please feel free to ]. If you cannot, request it below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
=== Technical requests === |
|
The ''']''' applies to uncontroversial moves (see ]) and reverts of undiscussed moves. The ''']''' is used for potentially controversial moves. |
|
|
|
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Edit this section if you want to move a request between sections.}}</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
====Uncontroversial technical requests==== |
|
'''If any of the following apply to the desired move, treat it as potentially controversial:''' |
|
|
|
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Most requests should be placed below this heading.}}</noinclude> |
|
*There is an existing article (not just a redirect) at the target title |
|
|
|
<!-- Copy the following code below, filling in page names and reason: |
|
*There has been any past debate about the best title for the page |
|
|
|
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | new page title | reason = reason for move}} |
|
*Someone could reasonably disagree with the move. |
|
|
|
and paste on a new line after this instruction, at the bottom of the existing list; do not delete this instruction; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Essex women's cricket team | 2 = Essex Women cricket team | discuss = | reason = Article was moved on 31 December and again on 9 January but had previously been part of a discussion on ] for which the decision was not to move the articles. I'm not able to move it back to it's original name | sig = ] (]) 21:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Bcp67}} |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Template:NBL Arenas | 2 = Template:NBL arenas | discuss = | reason = change template name to sentence case per ]. | sig = ] (]) 17:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Woko Sapien}} |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Template:TLLN TV | 2 = Template:Tyler–Longview TV | discuss = | reason = It'd be better for the names of the cities to be spelled out in the template title. | sig = ] (]) 16:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = 100.7.34.111}} |
|
|
*:The full name of the DMR is "Tyler-Longview (Lufkin & Nacadoches)", but I think ] might be more succinct. <span class="nowrap">--] (])</span> 16:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ==== |
|
'''If the page has recently been moved without discussion''', you may revert the move and initiate a discussion on its talk page. If you are unable to revert, request it below. |
|
|
|
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.}}</noinclude> |
|
|
<!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | previous title to revert to | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==== Contested technical requests ==== |
|
'''To list new technical requests''' use the following code at the bottom of the sub-section "'''Technical requests'''" immediately below: |
|
|
|
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Do not insert new requests in this section. Only move requests here if the requested move has been contested.}}</noinclude> |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Canada Permanent Trust Building | 2 = Canada Permanent Building | discuss = | reason = Name on facade is "Canada Permanent Building." Also, the building was home to two companies: the Canada Permanent Mortgage Corporation and its subsidiary the Canada Permanent Trust Company, both of which went under the "Canada Permanent" name. The use of the "Canada Permanent Building" name reflected this. See ]. | sig = ] (]) 20:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Tsc9i8}} |
|
|
::You and it was contested; a wag of the finger for bringing this to ] when you know that it's not uncontroversial. use "Canada Permanent Trust Building". ] (]) 22:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Yes, guilty as charged. See the original literature on the building from 1930, where it is clearly called the "Canada Permanent Building." . ] (]) 19:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Magical Taruruto | 2 = Magical Taruruto-kun | discuss = | reason = The series has so many title variations that it's confusing, but the addition of the -kun suffix is the most common way the title is given throughout the internet and within the series' fandom. The anime, the bulk of the series' popularity, has never been officially available in the west, and the MangaPlanet release isn't as widely known. The archived Toei Animation external link includes numerous grammatical errors and the English website (both current and archived) have very inconsistent names for other titles and descriptions (Goldfish Warning! being Goldfish Forecast, for example). | sig = ] (]) 01:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = RetroNova}} |
|
|
::@] This article has been moved seven times in the past, including away from the title you're proposing. This means the move is not uncontroversial and cannot be performed here without discussion. Please open a full ] by clicking the blue "discuss" button right above your comment. ] </span>]] 09:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Nakhichevan Khanate | 2 = Nakhchivan Khanate | discuss = | reason = The name of this khanate in 1747-1828 was Nakhchivan, while the name of the khanate indicated in the current title was formed after the transition under the control of the Russian Empire in 1828. Considering the fact that we are talking about a khanate that existed from 1747 to 1828, it would be correct to use the name "Nakhchivan Khanate" that corresponds to the original name of that period of time. | sig = ] (]) 14:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Egl7}} |
|
|
*:This is not uncontroversial at all. ] (]) 15:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Timing belt (camshaft) | 2 = Timing belt | discuss = | reason = This is the ] of that term with more than double the page views of the article ']' (also known as 'timing belt'. | sig = ] (]; ]) 06:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = PK2}} |
|
|
:: @] Looking at the page history, it has been moved in the opposite direction before so a full RM would be required to determine consensus for the move. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::See also at ]. ] (]) 16:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Rest House | 2 = Rest House (film) | discuss = | reason = This page was originally created at ], but was moved as the page ] did not then exist. However, I believe this was done incorrectly, as the page ] should redirect to ], these two terms being synonyms. Most people who search wikipedia for the term "Rest House" are likely to seeking information on lodging, rather than infomation about a more than 50 year old movie. I propose to move the current page and have the main page redirect to ]. | sig = ] (]) 06:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Lawrencekhoo}} |
|
|
:: @] Wanting to move the page away for a ] is not uncontroversial and is going to need a full RM. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::] currently redirects to ]. See ]. ] (]) 16:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Public good (economics) | 2 = Public good | discuss = | reason = As primary topic, and per ]—no need for a disambiguation page. | sig = ] (]) 18:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Closed Limelike Curves}} |
|
|
*: This probably deserves a full discussion. ] ] 18:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
*::{{Reply|Closed Limelike Curves}} This move is ], so it would require a requested-move discussion, which you can begin by clicking "discuss" on your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). ] ] 07:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Lufthansa | 2 = Lufthansa Group | discuss = | reason = the current trading name of Deutsche Lufthansa AG has been known as Lufthansa Group and mainly serves together as a trading brand of all its branches e.g Swiss and Austrian Airlines. The name Lufthansa mainly refers to its mainline airline subsidiary Lufthansa German Airlines, which is a parallel branch to its sister companies, there’s a need to differ these two from the others since they do have fairly different meanings | sig = ] (]) 14:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = Yuezhi Huang}} |
|
|
*:Relevant merge discussion: ] - not a very large number of participants, and consensus for the merge doesn't seem to strongly favor the title choice versus Lufthansa Group (although one response notes difficulty locating the actual legal entity entitled as such) - I don't see any reason to block this unless anybody else has a strong opinion, however, the actual ownership structure for this entity seems a little complex. I can see arguments for ] favoring the current title, we would need to analyze the large number of sources to identify which is the common name, which might be tricky due to multiple topics for "Lufthansa" ] 15:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
*::I would definitely contest this move. Lufthansa is a major internationally-known airline and if the participants in that merge discussion didn't discuss whether the title should be Lufthansa or Lufthansa Group, that's probably because it was very obvious that the ] is the one that should prevail. As was also noted in the merge discussion, it's hard to delineate a clear separation between the different entities involved, such as parent company Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Lufthansa Group. If, as the nom suggests, there's really a case for treating the group owning the Swiss and Austrian Airlines separately, then the solution would be to reverse the merge that was carried out in 2022. But what should not happen in my view, and which is certainly controversial, is to move the article away from ], leaving the latter as a redirect, given that it's one of the most widely known airline names in the world. Cheers — ] (]) 15:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::Thanks, I can stop trying to dig through the sources now as it's giving me a headache. I'll move this to contested - @] if you wish to proceed, you can click the "discuss" link above, fill in your rationale and click "publish" to open a discussion. ] 15:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::According to the Lufthansa Group website, the LHG is doing business as Lufthansa Aktie or Deutsche Lufthansa AG (LHA.XE), none of the wholly owned subsidiaries are doing business separately. To my conclusion, LHG = Deutsche Lufthansa AG = Lufthansa Aktie, Lufthansa however, refers to the wholly owned network airline “Lufthansa Airlines”, which is a parallel subsidiary just like Swiss and Austrian Airlines, a fairly distinct difference is given on the LHG website, as these two have completely different structures and management boards. Therefore I think the best solution is to reverse the merger of “Lufthansa Group” and “Lufthansa” articles which was done in 2022, and give each of them a clear definition of the difference between “Airline Group” and “Airline”. Cheers! ] (]) 15:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Also note that the ] and ] guidelines do not force us ignore the company's real name in its official paperwork. It's just a matter of an article title that is comprehensible to the ordinary WP user. For example, we have an article called ] rather than the officially correct "International Business Machines Corporation". ---<span style="font-family: Calibri">]<small> (]|]) </small></span> 19:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Reduce (computer algebra system) | 2 = REDUCE (computer algebra system) | discuss = | reason = Capitalize REDUCE for consistency and to agree with REDUCE documentation | sig = ] (]) 15:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | requester = F J Wright}} |
|
|
*:Typically our titles are written in sentence case (]), two exceptions I can think of would be ], which I don't think applies here (not seeing any coverage of the choice of the name REDUCE or whether it stands for anything, but maybe I'm missing it) or if it's very consistently used in sources in its uppercase form, but the only source we really have on the page is Sourceforge so it would be hard to say. ] 17:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:: @] I think we need more sources (in this case, showing a preference to use the uppercase title in running text) to go forward with this, and for the article in general. ] 18:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==== Administrator needed ==== |
|
:<code><nowiki>{{subst:RMassist|</nowiki>{{gray|''<nowiki><!--</nowiki>old page name, without brackets<nowiki>--></nowiki>''}}|{{gray|''<nowiki><!--</nowiki>requested name, without brackets<nowiki>--></nowiki>''}}|{{gray|''<nowiki><!--</nowiki>reason for move<nowiki>--></nowiki>''}}}}</code> |
|
|
|
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been ] or ] (see ] to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a ].}}</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | new title | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you object to a proposal listed in ''Technical requests'', please move it to the ''']''' section below. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''If your technical request is contested by another editor''', remove the request from the "Contested technical requests" section and follow the instructions at ''']'''. |
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, '''if the only obstacle to a technical move is another page in the way''' (e.g., a redirect to the current title of the article to be moved, a redirect with no incoming links, or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history—if it has a single history line, see ] instead), add the following code to the top of the page <u>that is in the way</u>: |
|
|
:<code><nowiki>{{db-move|</nowiki>{{gray|''<nowiki><!--</nowiki>page to be moved here<nowiki>--></nowiki>''}}|{{gray|''<nowiki><!--</nowiki>reason for move<nowiki>--></nowiki>''}}}}</code> |
|
|
|
|
|
This will list the undesired page for deletion under ]. If the page is a redirect, place the code above the redirection. For a list of articles being considered for uncontroversial speedy deletion, see ]. |
|
|
<!-- |
|
|
TO ADMINISTRATORS: If a request is completed, remove it. If the section is empty or not empty after your removal, you might note this in your edit summary, e.g., "done 2, not empty". |
|
|
--> |
|
| ⚫ |
===Technical requests=== |
|
|
<!-- |
|
|
Please use the template {{subst:RMassist|Old Page Name|Requested Name|Reason For Move}} below; replace "Old Page Name" with the current page name (without linking brackets), "Requested Name" with the name you would like (without linking brackets), and "Reason For Move" with the reason you have for renaming the page. PLEASE LEAVE A BLANK LINE BETWEEN SEPARATE REQUESTS. Place all new requests at the BOTTOM of the list below. |
|
|
--> |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
====Contested technical requests==== |
|
|
<!-- move contested technical requests directly below this comment line --> |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
====Requests to revert undiscussed moves==== |
|
