| Revision as of 03:42, 2 October 2013 editAunva6 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,653 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Pier Paolo Pasolini. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:47, 9 November 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| ==Re: Pier Paolo== | |||
| Please, you ''Must Stop'' these arbitrary edits. Why do you think me cleaning up after your vandalism is "arbitrary"? I told you, if you don't agree with something, take it in the talk page and work it out. You act in such a childish manner, that you can't even work out this problem in the talk page. I can let you keep your edit, but you have been so arbitrary that reaching consensus is almost impossible with you! (] (]) 20:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| ::Please use the talk page, Thank you. (] (]) 20:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| :At first I deleted both Teorema and Salo, but I let one of them slide, but for some reason you continue with these arbitrary edits. You were the one who started this problem on the first place by starting this conflict, and if you were mature enough, you would realize that it makes no difference to let said movie in or out his notable works section. I find that there is enough of his works in his "notable works" box. But if you have a reasonable problem, why not take the time to discuss it in the article's talk page. (] (]) 20:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| ::Ever heard of two wrongs don't make a right?? I'm done here and do what you wish, I felt I spent too much valuable time with this petty situation of yours and you seem to have no life whatsoever since you seem too obsessed with this, since you complain of this minor edit in wikipedia, how old are you by the way? 12? (] (]) 20:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| ::I have an account because I have sparetime that I want to contribute to the good of the community, help others and do good, and to fix some errors I sometimes find in my way when I use this website but appearently you took the time to respond to my page and according to what you wrote, you still need maturity and development while you can think about what you did, your mother probably still has to sit you in your proper place my friend ;) (] (]) 20:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| :::::::Don't be ridiculous, Paolo was killed by some Anti-left-wing extremists who went as far as to kill Pasolini, but it is said that the thugs who ran him over had something to do with some stolen parts of the Salo movie. (] (]) 21:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| ::I agree with you that he might have died because of what you said, but you need proof in order to support your statement. (] (]) 21:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| ] Hello and ]. When you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to ]. There are two ways to do this. Either: | |||
| # Add four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or | |||
| # With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (] or ]) located above the edit window. | |||
| This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. | |||
| Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 21:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == October 2013 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ]<sup>] - ]</sup> 03:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:47, 9 November 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.