| Revision as of 14:56, 9 October 2013 editAymatth2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors129,111 edits →Daniel Brandt: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:20, 26 May 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots533,515 edits Notification that File:BSatPoDCover.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
| (859 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
| ⚫ | ; Archives: ], ], ], ] | ||
| == fish == | |||
| ⚫ | ; Archives: ], ], ], ], ], ] | ||
| :Actually, this deserves something more than a trout. I hereby also admonish you. ] (]) 19:24, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Indefinitely banned == | |||
| ::Ugh, removed. If there's one thing I hate is that insipid "trouting" thing, I think that's bullet point #4 to add to the page edit notice. So, admonish away, but it may be helpful to say what for specifically. If you're going to claim ], you'd have to demonstrate what was actually disrupted. I was a minor player in the grand scheme of All Things Manning. ] (]) 20:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::That sounds an awefull lot like "others were behaving much worse" - which is true, but that doesn't mean you didn't waste a whole lot of peoples time. When your behaviour gets to the point you become part of an ArbCom case, and there is a proposed remedy to topic ban you, and you don't think that all that circus amounts to Misplaced Pages being disrupted, we have very different ideas of disruption. ] (]) 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Po''tay''to, po''tah''to. At the end of the day, I'd rather be sanctioned for something substantive (highlighting the project's dysfunction in dealing with civil yet biased editors) than trivial (the piddly civility warnings that litter my talk page over the years). ] (]) 21:58, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I'm sorry I name-dropped. I just didn't understand why no one was talking about it. When I realized no one seemed to know, I cautiously backed out of the room, knowing it would be better all around if you were the one to chose to notify or not. I obviously feel personally griefed, but I don't begrudge; you're being interesting. Going out bigger rather than smaller is pretty Manning-esque, at least. __] (]) 22:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Further to our earlier correspondence with you, the committee has adopted the following motion: | |||
| == You absolutely must be kidding me == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|For continued serious breaches of policy, including off-wiki harassment, {{user|Tarc}} is indefinitely banned.}} | |||
| If this is some sort of double-bluff trolling then I salute you for your Byzantine madness. | |||
| By way of enforcement I have indefinitely blocked your account. Appeal in due course must solely be by email to the committee at {{NonSpamEmail|arbcom-l|lists.wikimedia.org}}. | |||
| If not, then I've got to know: that bit where we both got warned by Penwhale: part of the act, or were you "angry in character," as it were? I know I was pretty furious with you, for... what are the right words... ah yes, ''making a carefully-parsed and neutrally-worded argument denying the rights of a transgendered person''. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ]] 22:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Assuming again that your statement is sincere (an odd assumption regarding a person describing a campaign of deceit,) what is the answer? How is the community to deal with people like your character, who peddle utterly objectionable opinions with a courteous smile? ] (]) 22:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : I think you're missing the greater point. A majority of ArbCom is currently voting that his behavior was generally understandable and reasonable and not that much of a disruption. I wonder how they can now sanction him for that, when they wouldn't sanction admitted and calculatedly discriminatory language? This is what they call "a pickle". Which infraction will turn out to be more objectionable? If they admit he used discriminatory speech, they have to admit they gave a clear pass for it. <small>I, of course, thought it stunk) End self-congratulations,</small> __] (]) 23:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:Well, speaking for myself, Tarc, I'll miss you. ~] <small>(])</small> 23:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| * What? Why? Some explanation please? --] (]) 01:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *:Doesn't sound like they are going to be forthcoming..Tarc although we do not often see eye to eye I wish you the best and a speedy return to the pedia. ] (]) 01:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Seems like the only explanation is in this discussion: ]. ~] <small>(])</small> 00:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::"''Problematic''", "''insensitive''", "''inflammatory and offensive''", and "''unacceptable''" is a far cry from "''generally understandable and reasonable''". (].) -- ] 01:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * A secret resolution? --] (]) 01:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Three of the five of those are picked from the minority side, not the majority I was speaking of. The rest speak to an isolated statement treated as a regrettable exception to speech that is otherwise seen as reasonable and non-discriminatory. So I don't see it as a far cry. If the majority had actually said "''inflammatory and offensive''", and "''unacceptable''" then I wouldn't see an issue here. But they didn't. __] (]) 07:56, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | **Dean Wormer. ] (]) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::For the record, the "minority" you speak of is an abstention, not support of that FoF. -- ] 12:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ****The ban, based on secret deliberations about off-Wiki activity, announced with generalities and inadequate explanation, does not enhance the reputation of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 04:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Agreed, opposition was the majority, and abstaining and supporting were minority positions. The commentary was still described as mostly reasonable and not actionable, with more votes expressing agreement with that sentiment. I'm not saying there was no sentiment that the speech was discriminatory. But it was in the clear minority, no quotes. __] (]) 13:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Well, this is crap. I know I'm late to the party here, but I only just found out about it. Very strange and disappointing from ArbCom, who continue to live down to my expectations. ] ] 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Most everything said in these discussions should be considered delivered under ], I'm afraid. I am genuinely a rather churlish, oftentimes quick-tempered, and honestly somewhat of the proverbial ] at times...read through the talk page and archives here sometimes, I've had some fun moments over the years. So it wasn't a big deal to tap into some of that while affecting a right-wing-ish argument on the topic. Most of what I said to Gorand though was pretty on-the-mark, as IMO he really did a great disservice to that side of the argument. | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:MxPx - Chick Magnet cover.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not a rah-rah advocate of transgenderism or any of that, for the record. For me it's like same-sex marriage; I am comfortably heterosexual and if others who aren't want to get married, by all means go for it. If Bradley feels more comfortable in life as Chelsea, hey, knock yourself out. | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:School of Rock Poster.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 00:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:BSatPoDCover.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 00:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::A wise man ], "''We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.''" -- ] 01:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed re: Josh. One more question: if you page up the way you'll find you + Greg arguing with me -- was Greg your accomplice there or a coincidence? ] (]) 07:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::No accomplices, no. There was only one person I told of this beforehand, but that person is not a Misplaced Pages editor per se, and had nothing to do with this. ] (]) 13:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *"Personal bias" at ArbCom? Surely you jest. Have you not read ]? Anyway, Tarc, I'm not sure what you were hoping to accomplish, but whatever works for you. :-)] (]) 21:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Oh, noes!!!== | |||
| Now Kirill has to change his vote, since he doesn't want to be Politically Wrong on such an important matter as separating the Righteous from the Wicked... | |||
| Your after-the-fact rationalization of your trolling isn't really logically consistent; you should probably spend more time on that. Better yet, just own up that you were trolling for shits and giggles and had a good time, which is probably closer to the truth than your explanation. | |||
| xoxo, | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :When I want to have a good time, I login to my blood-elf paladin and go raiding in the Siege of Orgrimmar, or curb-stomp n00bs in Strand of the Ancients with my Forsaken rogue. The Misplaced Pages is not my shits n giggles forum. ] (]) 13:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| He does have entries on various other language versions. I am not interested in starting an article, but there are plenty of sources if anyone else wants to. Kohs was not interesting to me as a critic of Misplaced Pages – not that it can't use criticism – but as a pioneer of the paid editing industry. I suppose paid editing would have happened without him. Anyway, it seems Kohs really did not want an article after all, and is not exactly a major public figure, so that is done with. ] (]) 14:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:20, 26 May 2024
Indefinitely banned
Further to our earlier correspondence with you, the committee has adopted the following motion:
For continued serious breaches of policy, including off-wiki harassment, Tarc (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned.
By way of enforcement I have indefinitely blocked your account. Appeal in due course must solely be by email to the committee at arbcom-l
lists.wikimedia.org.
For the Arbitration Committee, AGK 22:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, speaking for myself, Tarc, I'll miss you. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- What? Why? Some explanation please? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Doesn't sound like they are going to be forthcoming..Tarc although we do not often see eye to eye I wish you the best and a speedy return to the pedia. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Seems like the only explanation is in this discussion: Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard/Archive_29#Indefinite_ban_of_Tarc. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- A secret resolution? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Dean Wormer. Collect (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The ban, based on secret deliberations about off-Wiki activity, announced with generalities and inadequate explanation, does not enhance the reputation of Misplaced Pages. Edison (talk) 04:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Dean Wormer. Collect (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, this is crap. I know I'm late to the party here, but I only just found out about it. Very strange and disappointing from ArbCom, who continue to live down to my expectations. Reyk YO! 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MxPx - Chick Magnet cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MxPx - Chick Magnet cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:School of Rock Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:School of Rock Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BSatPoDCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BSatPoDCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
