| Revision as of 11:48, 9 June 2006 editBdj (talk | contribs)19,739 edits Request for Arbitration← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:12, 11 November 2020 edit undoElli (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators56,794 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Washington Initiative 912.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (147 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==AfD nomination of 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000== | |||
| == Henry M. Jackson == | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 19:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Expanding 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000 == | |||
| Hi. ] has request action be taken with regard to a violation of the ]. That rule states that a user shall not revert an edit 3 times during a twenty-four hour period, otherwise they shall be liable to be blocked. I've reviewed your edits to this page and there do appear to be 3 or more reverts to the same text in 24hours, meaning you have compromised the 3RR. Since the edits were from yesterday, I am leaving this warning on your talk page to draw your attention to the rule, rather than blocking your account. Please consider the rule and discuss edits on the talk page rather than reverting edits you do not agree with. ] <sup> ] </sup> 10:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Better expand it soon, because posting a notice on the article talk page isn't enough to derail an articles for deletion request. Those requests will usually take about 3-5 days and in the case of an article like this, normally result in deletion. that isn't a crack on the article subject or the creators/editors. It is just how it works. If you have a concrete plan on improving the article (even ONE source from something ] which covers the subject in significant detail is enough) but don't want to update the article right now, put that plan up on the ]. I'm not trying to talk down to you or tell you something you don't already know (as you've got a load of edits under your belt). I'm just trying to suggest a course of action. ] (]) 16:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Following further reversions (eg. ) you have been blocked for contravention of wikipedias ]. ] <sup> ] </sup> 19:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Martin O'Donnell== | |||
| Jake, | |||
| You mentioned Marty O'Donnell's email address recently. What is it? | |||
| Thanks | |||
| ::Immediately after returning to Misplaced Pages from his 24-hour suspension for reverting an article eight times in under 24 hours, ] deleted all of the language from the article that four out of five editors agreed was notable and verifiable. He dishonestly titled his as ''Restore consensus version''. This is poor sportsmanship at its worst. -- ] 19:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 02:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {| class="user-block" | |||
| || ] | |||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> ] (]) 21:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==] and Strategic Vision== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a disambiguation page which either | |||
| :::*disambiguates only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a ]); | |||
| :::* disambiguates zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or | |||
| :::*is an ] redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function. | |||
| Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Washington+Initiative+912|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-disambig-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (] | ]) 21:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Do you have a linkable source where someone in the Washington Dems saying Strategic Vision's goal is "to shape media perceptions"? I did a google search on the wa-democrats.org and found these that reference Strategic vision as "" and referred to David Johnson as "", but that was the closest I got. --] 22:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Executive DirectorJaxon Ravens used the term in a speech to the Young Democrats. I think I saw it used by Paul Berent. I still can't believe that they don't have all former articles searchable on wa-democrats.org.--] 22:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ahhh. Okay. We'll see what FRCP11 thinks of the mods with sources. --] 22:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I am skeptical of his willingness to work together towards a quality article. That text has been in there for months. | |||
| --] 22:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Maybe. It lacked a inline cite which makes some editors edgy. The additions of an inline cite for David Johnson and further sources in the discussion should solve the problem though. --] 22:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::The text lacked a cite and seemed an awfully aggressive allegation without a cite. Once a cite was provided, I was fine with it. -- ] 21:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'll wait to see what RFCP11's response to my proposed solution is before removing the POV tag. The downside with wikipedia's policies is that anyone can claim POV and it has to remain until the conflict is resolved. --] 19:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| =="Democrat Party" article== | |||
| Hello 8bit. Our old friend rjensen is up to his old tricks and has written an article called "Democrat Party" that dignifies this term. Misplaced Pages is considering deleting the ] article. I hope you will weigh in on the topic here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Democrat_Party_(United_States) I believe an article about this perjorative term doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| ====Regarding reversions made on ] ] (]) to ]==== | |||
| {| class="user-block" | |||
| || ] | |||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] 19:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| That FRCP11 sure likes to throw around 3RR claims when he does not get his way.--] 19:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Just a suggestion that saves FRCP11 from 3RR. Instead of outright reverting, make a modification to his updates. As long as you are making modifications instead of completely removing it falls under ] which isn't exactly smiled upon, but it won't get you blocked. --] 20:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I just love the fact that his claim got him blocked and now the admins are going over his records.--] 20:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Heh. I just noticed that. Anyways, try editing rather than outright reverting. It's obvious neither of you see eye to eye politically, but life's too short for the feud y'all have going on. If you don't like something he puts in the article, find a 'reputable' source that backs your view, make the modifications and include the source. My main issue with his updates so far has been that when he adds a POV to the article he only adds the side he agrees with and makes the POV appear more widely accepted than it really is. ] is not only about making sure dissenting opinions are addressed fairly, but that they are also addressed equally. --] 21:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for Arbitration == | |||
| A has been opened up concerning the events of the last 10 days. Please comment there. --] <small>]</small> 11:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:12, 11 November 2020
AfD nomination of 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000
I have nominated 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Expanding 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000
Better expand it soon, because posting a notice on the article talk page isn't enough to derail an articles for deletion request. Those requests will usually take about 3-5 days and in the case of an article like this, normally result in deletion. that isn't a crack on the article subject or the creators/editors. It is just how it works. If you have a concrete plan on improving the article (even ONE source from something reliable which covers the subject in significant detail is enough) but don't want to update the article right now, put that plan up on the deletion discussion. I'm not trying to talk down to you or tell you something you don't already know (as you've got a load of edits under your belt). I'm just trying to suggest a course of action. Protonk (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Martin O'Donnell
Jake, You mentioned Marty O'Donnell's email address recently. What is it?
Thanks 75.67.239.158 (talk) 02:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Washington Initiative 912
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Washington Initiative 912 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 21:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)