Misplaced Pages

User talk:June24th: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:37, 12 October 2013 editJune24th (talk | contribs)15 edits →October 2013← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:36, 18 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
}} }}


"A block is a measure used to protect Misplaced Pages from possible improper activity in breach of editorial policies". I believe publishing a true version of the version the Brahma Kumaris fabricates is worth to be blocked and even the editor june24th is called a sock puppet, excuse me!? Misplaced Pages is a multilingual, web-based, free-content encyclopedia project supported by the Wikimedia Foundation and based on an openly editable model. "Libel, nonsense, hoaxes, and vandalism should be completely removed, as should material that violates copyright and material for which no reliable source that supports it has ever been published". Now before I have to copy and paste the Wiki policies for the administrators of this brahma kumaris page I urge the WIKIPEDIA administrators to completely remove brahma Kumaris from this data base till they get their act together. Wikkipedia is to be a reliable source and when people are blocked for getting the reliable done and than be blocked than Wikkipedia can not be considered a reliable sours anymore. This edit war is going on for a while. BKs are in charge and other reliable resources are banned. How can Misplaced Pages check the brahma kumaris on the hand of all reliable resources when they are constantly removed? The Brahma kumaris version is full of broken references and exaggerations which is false information and misleading and because Brahma Kumaris is not so pretty as they like to appear and of course you don't like it, gives you no right to cover up the truth, ban the truth and pretend nothing is wrong. Januari18th has all references Crystal clear. My act here is not vandalism but more to contribute to the Misplaced Pages RELIABLE sours and I can tell my children with full confidence to "look it up on wiki", now I doubt it. If you cannot tell the truth or are not able or allowed to tell the truth you mite consider the fact you joined the wrong group and if you keep fighting the truth to come out that is called "Suck puppets". Get it? June24th. {{unblock reviewed | 1=I have no other Misplaced Pages accounts. I have never even edited the Misplaced Pages before. This is a complete false accusation made by BKWSU followers who are trying to control the page. I believe publishing a true version of the version the Brahma Kumaris fabricates is worth to be blocked. I urge the WIKIPEDIA administrators to completely remove brahma Kumaris from this data base till they get their act together. Wikkipedia is to be a reliable source and when people are blocked for getting the reliable done and than be blocked than Wikkipedia can not be considered a reliable sours anymore. The Brahma kumaris version is full of broken references and exaggerations which is false information and misleading. .] (]) 16:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC) | decline=Per below (How's ''that'' for a response to something in the ] category?) — ] (]) 18:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)}}
:What is suspicious is that, three days after January was blocked, you show up with a similar username style, with a similar story behind it, and behave as January did sans the outing. We weren't born yesterday. —] ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:36, 18 April 2022

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Danh108 (talk) 16:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - TP 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

June24th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no other Misplaced Pages accounts. I have never even edited the Misplaced Pages before. This is a complete false accusation made by BKWSU followers who are trying to control the page. I believe publishing a true version of the version the Brahma Kumaris fabricates is worth to be blocked. I urge the WIKIPEDIA administrators to completely remove brahma Kumaris from this data base till they get their act together. Wikkipedia is to be a reliable source and when people are blocked for getting the reliable done and than be blocked than Wikkipedia can not be considered a reliable sours anymore. The Brahma kumaris version is full of broken references and exaggerations which is false information and misleading. .June24th (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below (How's that for a response to something in the TL;DR category?) — Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is suspicious is that, three days after January was blocked, you show up with a similar username style, with a similar story behind it, and behave as January did sans the outing. We weren't born yesterday. —Jeremy v^_^v 18:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)