User talk:TParis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:28, 25 October 2013 editMartinvl (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,715 edits →Topic Ban appeal ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 18:01, 28 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,533 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:TParis/Archive 17) (bot
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{talk header}}		{{talk header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|maxarchivesize = 250K
			\|counter = 17
			\|algo = old(48h)
			\|archive = User talk:TParis/Archive %(counter)d
			}}
	{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}\|autoconfirmed\|{{tmbox		{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}\|autoconfirmed\|{{tmbox
	\|small = {{{small\|}}}		\|small = {{{small\|}}}
Line 13:		Line 18:
	}}		}}
	{{User:TParis/Nav}}		{{User:TParis/Nav}}
			{{semi-retired}}
	__TOC__		__TOC__

	{{User:MiszaBot/config
			{{archive box\|auto=yes\|search=yes}}
	\|maxarchivesize = 250K
	\|counter = 11
	\|algo = old(48h)
	\|archive = User talk:TParis/Archive %(counter)d
	}}
	{{archive box\|auto=yes}}
	{{bots\|deny=DPL bot}}		{{bots\|deny=DPL bot}}
			{\| style="clear:both;"
			\|}

			== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
	== Top Namespace Edits ==

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	Hello TParis, I frequently use your tools, and they are very informative. I was curious if it is possible to increase the amount of results for the "Top Namespace Edits" tool (the default being 100). Or if there is another tool that serves the same purpose to find more than 100 results. I have been curious about this for awhile, so I thought might as well go straight to the source. Regards, <font color="#BA181F">''']</font> <font color="#BA181F"><small>]</small></font>''' 03:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
	:I'm having trouble recalling exactly which tool you're talking about, can you give me a link?--v/r - ]] 12:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2024\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	:: Oh really? You probably have more tools then you can remember aha. I was refering to . My mistake for calling it Top Namespace Edits, I had my results for the main namespace bookmarked, so I thought that was the name of the tool. <font color="#BA181F">''']</font> <font color="#BA181F"><small>]</small></font>''' 13:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
	:: I do not know if you did not see this, but I guess there is not a way to expand the search. <font color="#BA181F">''']</font> <font color="#BA181F"><small>]</small></font>''' 00:16, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
	:::Ohh yeah, sorry. I'm sorry but there is no setting to make that do anymore pages. It's limited to 100 so I don't overtax the database servers.--v/r - ]] 00:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

			</div>
	Oh okay, thanks for the explanation. Regards, <font color="#BA181F">''']</font> <font color="#BA181F"><small>]</small></font>''' 16:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue 223, November 2024 ==
	== Ban Appeal of AKonanykhin ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	Hi. Since you contributed to the resulting in the ban of Wikiexperts, you may want to consider the CEO's appeal at ]. --] (] · ] · ]) 17:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1256183913 -->

			== Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards ==
	== Titus Andronicus ==

			Voting is now open for the ] ] and ] awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes ] and ] respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via ] (]) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
	You know, I was wondering what v/r stood for in all your posts! Anyhow, wanted to ask you a question about the ''Titus Andronicus'' situation. Given that the block on the page is being lifted tomorrow, I posted a question asking what happens next, given that you said three of the images were fine, I assumed those three could be put back. Perhaps I read too much into your post, I don't know. Whatever the case, when I asked the question, Werith responded with "Given the facts that have been established, (the files in question can be replaced, not easily but certainly doable), the files need to stay out of the article for failing WP:NFCC#1." This confuses me. Was there another discussion taking place somewhere? I didn't know any facts had been established. The vast majority of the editors involved in the discussion felt they didn't fail NFCC#1, yourself included. As an admin, I thought your points carried some weight, but was your involvement completely pointless? And also, is there no method of redress regarding a next move. Obviously, I can't just add them back or Werith would remove them, and we'd be back exactly where we started, so I'm wondering what one should do in these circumstances. Thanks very much. ] (]) 23:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1259903100 -->
	:{{tps}} v/r can stand for "very respectful" or "very respectfully"; I've seen it both ways. It's common at the bottom of emails. Regards, —<span style="font-family:'century gothic';background:black;border-radius:2em 0;">  ]]  </span> 23:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
	::Really? That's interesting. Is that an American thing? In Ireland, it's (semi) common to sign formal emails with RY ("respectfully yours"), BR ("Best Regards"), or in less formal communications ATB ("All the Best"). ] (]) 23:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
	:::It could very well be an American thing. I never saw it myself until I joined the U.S. Military a few years ago and ever since then almost everyone I've exchanged an email with has had it in their email signature. Regards, —<span style="font-family:'century gothic';background:black;border-radius:2em 0;">  ]]  </span> 00:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
	::::Yeah, Dainomite is right about v/r. As far as me saying that three of the images are fine, that was only in reference to the AN3 complaint and why I didn't block anyone. My opinion of ] is as subject to consensus as anyone else'. Admins don't carry anymore weight, in that regard, but we are required to ] and there was enough criticism of my decision that an explanation was warranted. So as far as a way forward, you should seek to develop a consensus. I see that Kww and a few of ya'all have begun discussing it. I'd give discussion a few more days and then see if anyone has been convinced of either side. From my vantage point, it seems some folks feel Werieth may have some legitimate concerns and so those should be vetted. However, if discussion stalls, then a ] discussion or ] discussion should be able to get things moving again.--v/r - ]] 00:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
	:::There's no way a consensus is going to be reached through discussion on the talk page. Werith is simply too unreasonable and refuses to have his opinion challenged. As I mentioned somewhere in the myriad of discussion, I did plan to file a ] before everything blew up. I told Werith I would file one. It's possible that because I didn't do it straight away, he assumed I wasn't going to do it at all, which is not an unreasonable assumption. I planned on doing it the next day, but by that stage many cats had leaped amongst many pigeons. I'll do it tomorrow so. One final (two-part) question though. Given that the images are currently orphans (except the BBC one), don't they run the risk of being deleted before the WP:NFCR has run it's course? Secondly, if the purpose of the WP:NFCR is to determine whether or not the images are legitimate for usage in the article, doesn't it make more sense for them to actually be in the article whilst the discussion is ongoing, so people can see the caption and accompaying text etc rather than just looking at the image in isolation. Apologies if these are foolish questions, but I've never done anything in this area before. ] (]) 01:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
	::::The CSD criteria for unused non-free files says they may be deleted after ]. If you start a NFCR discussion tomorrow, it should be over in two days or so. You should be alright. As far as their use and context, you can use a permanent link to a historical revision of the page to demonstrate that. I don't know if Werieth is reasonable or not, I can't recall a time I've ever worked with them. But Kww is there too and if you can convince him then there is no need to also convince Werieth because the discussion has leaned a certain direction.--v/r - ]] 01:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
	::Ok. Thanks very much. I appreciate the advice. Nice meeting you. ] (]) 01:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

			== Always precious ==
	== Clarification request: ] ==
			]
			Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 07:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

			:I remember that! I believe this was also the same day that ] hit the front page for the first time too. Thank you! v/r - ]] 14:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
	The clarification request that you have filed has been archived, with no action taken: For the Arbitration Committee, ''']]]''' 05:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue 224, December 2024 ==
	== pcount script ==

	Hi TParis,

	Sorry to bother you. The reason I am contacting you is that the error page says you are looking after the script. Please let me know if this is inappropriate.

	The "pcount" script seems to have stopped working for the German language Misplaced Pages in the last few days. (It is still working fine for the English language one, and the alternate "yaec" script is also still working even for the German language Misplaced Pages.)

	seems to switch between the following behaviours since Saturday or Sunday:
	* It claims my user does not exist, often after a long wait.
	* It claims the German Misplaced Pages does not exist, often after a long wait.
	* It takes so long that a proxy server times out.

	on the other hand still works fine. Similarly it works for the English language Wiktionary, but not the German language one. Perhaps some server communications error?

	Strangely, another script,
	,
	seems to have no problem accessing the German Misplaced Pages. (But perhaps it simply does less work and so is less affected by any network problems?)

	Thanks.

	--] (]) 23:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
	:Try this one and please update any links to toolserver on de Misplaced Pages to reflect the new URL.--v/r - ]] 23:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

	::Yes, that works much better (and faster). It does give an error message before the result though:

	Warning: syntax error, unexpected '=' in Unknown on line 33 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 79 Warning: syntax error, unexpected '=' in Unknown on line 33 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 79
	SpecMade - {#tool#} - X!'s tools

	::BTW, I found the link on ] (at the bottom at "Beitragszähler ''(detailliert)''"). Do you happen to know who can fix the links on those ''Special:'' pages? (Don't worry if not, I'll ask on its talk page then.) Thanks again. --] (]) 23:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
	:::I thought I fixed that error already about an hour ago. Try it again and let me know. As far as who can update the link, ask an admin.--v/r - ]] 00:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
	::::Yes, the script is working fine now. About updating the link I have asked on de.wikipedia (but it's night time in DE now). Thanks for all your help! --] (]) 00:46, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
	:::::Just to close this out, the link has been {{diff\|de:Vorlage:Editcount\|123697186\|99488573\|fixed}} too. Thanks. --] (]) 13:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

	== iPad Air ==

	Thanks for the move. Think you could re-unite ] with it's original host, ]? I assume the page history of ] should be preserved somehow. ] (]) 19:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
	:No problem, it's done.--v/r - ]] 19:37, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

	== Pages created ==

	https://toolserver.org/~tparis/pages/index.php?name=Kaiyr&lang=ru&wiki=wikipedia&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects&getall=1
	«Unknown database 'ruwiki_p'MySQL ERROR! Table 'toolserver.user' doesn't exist» - please fix. --] (]) 21:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
	:Toolserver is being shut down Dec 31st. Try the WMFLabs version and please update all links on RU Misplaced Pages. .--v/r - ]] 22:37, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

	== ''The Bugle'': Issue XCI, October 2013 ==

	{\| style="width: 100%;"		{\| style="width: 100%;"
Line 107:		Line 80:
	\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>		\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
	<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">		<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
	* Project news: '']''		* Project news: '']''
	* Articles: '']''		* Articles: '']''
	* Book ~~reviews~~: '']''		* Book review: '']''
	* Op-ed: '']''		* Op-ed: '']''
	</div>		</div>
	\|-		\|-
Line 116:		Line 89:
	\|}		\|}
	<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">		<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
	''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 22:39, 23 ~~October~~ ~~2013~~ (UTC)		''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1264992348 -->
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0645 -->

	== Main page talk page ==

	Just to let you know, there's the beginnings of a discussion concerning your protection ]. ] (]) 10:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

	:Concerning - I don't think anyone was trying to be snarky. The concern was more 'why are we using a week of protection in this scenario' - a question which was perfectly valid. Don't take it personally, as I'm sure Modest Genius' intention wasn't to call you out with the intent of disparaging your good name. Cheers, ] 23:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

	==37 TRW==
	Cool. Just make sure everything is correct Thank you :) ] (]) 15:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

	== Lou Sander ==

	Lou Sander notified the following individuals:

	#Liz
	#Annalisa_Ventola
	#Tento2
	#Askahrc
	#Iantresman
	#David_in_DC

	about a discussion where the dispute was "How should the mainstream view of "science has become a series of dogmas" be addressed in the lead?"

	In order to determine if those individuals were supportive of the mainstream principles of science, we review their histories in the field.

	#Liz has stated that she believes "There are Editors, skeptics, who do monitor all articles they label pseudoscience. That's not a conspiracy, they say as much on their User Pages that this is their interest on Misplaced Pages. I don't think they are evil, they are just quick to label any person who believes in alternate views of science as "fringe" or a "quack" and they don't want people with those views editing Misplaced Pages." She may very well be right. This is, however, a clear predisposition towards one side of the conflict - one hostile to the mainstream principles of science .
	#Annalisa_Ventola believes that Parapsychology is science.
	#Tento2 has supported including content supportive of Sheldrake from "The Institute of Noetic Sciences,"
	#Askahrc has removed parapsychologist from the subject's description .
	#Iantresman was banned as a result of his being a "general POV-warrior of all sorts of pseudoscience and fringe science ideas."
	#David_in_DC, while the lest egregious of the notifications, supports a lede which excludes the word parapsychologist from the description of Sheldrake (]).

	Without arguing that this selection of editors are right or wrong about the content dispute (because we don't argue content here at this encyclopedia, just make sure no one uses the word fuck!), it is clear that the failure to notify vzaak, for instance, is glaring. Why was vzaak not notified? Should vzaak assume it's because he does not "know how to express opinions politely and helpfully?" That's incivil. Is it because Lou assumes vzaak will disagree with him? That's canvassing. Is it an oversight? Possibly, but then let's ask the same question about everyone who clearly disagrees with Lou on the talk page. ] (]) 18:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
	:You do realize that although you've expressed to Fluffernutter that you do not want to be connected to your real account, which hasn't edited in a year, that I'm going to have to assume socking? I'm very likely to simply delete this from my user page w/in 24 hours because I believe that promoting socking (by acknowledging issues brought up by socks) is more damaging to the encyclopedia than addressing the issues they bring up. I don't know your story, but if you're an indef banned disruptive user, then the best course of action is to not give you a reason to return.--v/r - ]] 21:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

	I know you have better things to do than wade through the muck that section has become as the various sides again post their walls of only semi relevant text, particularly when you have also been pinged by someone who screams SOCK!!!
	I am sorry that I notified the editors which led to the new diarrhea of text, but I thought it was a necessary step when naming someone on the boards. I am hoping that my post that led to their notification doesn't get lost.

	<blockquote>'' He titles the section heading with "Sheldrake/Tumbleman" although the section on the talk page has nothing to do with Tumbleman who had been indeffed several days before. Liz has been an and (uncollapse the Tumbleman results) Iantresman and Askahrc also speak in favor of him. None of the people who spoke against his actions in the AE were notified by Lou Sander. -- ] 09:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)<br>
	:''if you look at you will find in support of the idea (indeffed user Tumbleman), iantresman, Annalisa Ventola. none of the people speaking against the use of the word "hypothesis" were in the "randomly" selected users notified by Lou Sander. Do you need more? I hate to have people have to slog through the mire on this topic.-- ] 09:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)}''</blockquote>
	Thank you for your time. -- ] 02:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
	:TRPoD, I gave Lou and his reply was . Let's give him time to see if the message sunk in.--v/r - ]] 13:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

	== About ''X!'s Edit Counter'' and an error ==
	Hello. Firstly I want to thank you for your work in this tool, very useful to most of wikipedians of all wikis; but this is not the matter I want to tell you.

	]

	Sometimes —and now from some days ago— I get a rare error when I try to count my edits on Spanish Misplaced Pages (my home wiki), with this message: ″''Zerabat no existe''″ (translated in english: ″''Zerabat does not exist''″). However, when I tried to see my edits on English Misplaced Pages, after a long time loading the page (toolserver is veeery slow) I finally saw my edits there. I do not know if it is an error when the tool try to connect to ESWIKI database or why, but this is not the only case I know in ESWIKI. My user account really exists. I would like to know what is the cause of this. Greets. --] (]) 13:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
	:Are you using the toolserver version or the WMFLabs version?--v/r - ]] 13:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

	== Topic Ban appeal ==

	I saw your notice.

	I request an immediate relaxation in respect of the articles ] and ], both of which are currently being reviewed as ].

	I also request an immediate relaxation in respect of an SPA that I am about to place on another user.

	Thank you.

	] (]) 17:26, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:01, 28 December 2024

This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

If you have come here to change my opinion, be ready to also change yours.

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 223, November 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at battles of Operation Veritable in 1945

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I remember that! I believe this was also the same day that Ford Island hit the front page for the first time too. Thank you! v/r - T P 14:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 224, December 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Franco-Prussian War
Op-ed: Nick-D visits the Swiss Air Force Museum