Revision as of 16:47, 16 November 2013 edit☼ (talk | contribs)1,574 edits →RfC: Chopin's nationality← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:33, 10 January 2025 edit undoSmerus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,064 edits →Chopin and the Stalinist period in Poland: I don't think so | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Spoken article requested|]|Featured article and an important subject in music}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{talkheader}} | |||
{{WPBiography|living=no|class=C|musician-priority=High|musician-work-group=yes|listas=Chopin, Frederic}} | |||
{{FAQ|quickedit=no|collapsed=no}} | |||
{{WikiProject Composers|class=start|importance=Top}} | |||
{{Article history | |||
{{WikiProject France|class=C|importance=High}} | |||
|action1=PR | |||
{{WikiProject Poland | |||
|action1oldid=589291114 | |||
|class=C | |||
|action1date=5 January 2014 | |||
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no | |||
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Frédéric Chopin/archive1 | |||
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes | |||
|action1result=Reviewed | |||
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes | |||
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes | |||
|action2=GAN | |||
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes | |||
|action2oldid=596771742 | |||
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes | |||
|action2date=23 February 2014 | |||
|importance=top}} | |||
|action2link=Talk:Frédéric Chopin/GA1 | |||
{{WP1.0|class=C|category=category|VA=yes|importance=High}} | |||
|action2result=listed | |||
|action3=PR | |||
|action3oldid=617366622 | |||
|action3date=17 July 2014 | |||
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Frédéric Chopin/archive2 | |||
|action3result=Reviewed | |||
|action4=FAC | |||
|action4oldid=621515826 | |||
|action4date=17 August 2014 | |||
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Frédéric Chopin/archive1 | |||
|action4result=promoted | |||
|action5=FAR | |||
|action5oldid= 1030643725 | |||
|action5date=10 July 2021 | |||
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Frédéric Chopin/archive1 | |||
|action5result=kept | |||
|currentstatus=FA | |||
|topic=music | |||
|four=no | |||
|maindate=17 October 2014 | |||
|dykdate=1 March 2014 | |||
|dykentry=... that ''']''' ''(pictured)'' ] of ] in 1831 and never returned? | |||
|dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/Frédéric Chopin | |||
|otd1date=2010-03-01|otd1oldid=347176295 | |||
|otd2date=2017-02-22|otd2oldid=766855824 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=FA|vital=yes|listas=Chopin, Frederic|blp=no|1= | |||
{{EducationalAssignment}} | |||
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-priority=High|musician-work-group=yes}} | |||
{{OnThisDay|date1=2010-03-01|oldid1=347176295}} | |||
{{WikiProject Composers}} | |||
{{archives|auto=no|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=60|index=Talk:Frédéric Chopin/Archive index| | |||
{{WikiProject France|importance=High}} | |||
# ] | |||
{{WikiProject Poland|importance=top}} | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{ |
|archiveheader = {{Aan}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 70K | |maxarchivesize = 70K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 26 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
|algo = old(60d) | |algo = old(60d) | ||
Line 42: | Line 62: | ||
|leading_zeros=0 | |leading_zeros=0 | ||
|indexhere=yes}} | |indexhere=yes}} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== |
== Semi protected glitch == | ||
Per ], Chopin should be described as a Polish composer. There's not much to argue about here. Thank you for your time, and please drop the edit warring and childish user talk page blanking. Thank you. ] (]) 09:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
:I would like some clarification of your interpretation for ], then. Because to me, ] says that the coutry of birth is not to be mentioned, and the relevant nationalities are the ones relevant to the context of the creation of notable work. I will not claim to be a qualified expert in Chopin's work, but even if he was already composing in Poland, it seem to me that most of his most notable works were done in Paris. So to me, ] support "Polish-French composer". ] (]) 08:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Blanking your own talk page is allowed, per ]. Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered ''or unregistered'' users, from removing comments from '''their own''' talk pages, although ] is preferred. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
It seems a bit ridiculous that a guy with a French name and French nationality would be listed as "Polish" without qualificagtion. Personally I have no dog in this fight, but I do believe that you're trying to pull the wool over the reader's eyes by denying that someone called "Frédéric Chopin" is in any sense French. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::That's resolvable: call him "Fryderyk", as he was baptized in Poland. As for the French surname, what are all those Americans doing with English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Russian, Turkish, Indian, Chinese, Egyptian, Haitian, etc., names? ] (]) 04:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Except for the small detail that he wrote his own name in French, not Polish. But, if you so insist, change his name to "Fryderyk" then. And change his surname to "Szopen" while you're at it. And are you sure Wojciech Żywny wasn't Polish? You should look into that. Certainly Marie Curie was Polish... | |||
:::Nihil novi, would you care to explain to me why you have edited three articles so that the Marie Curie, born in Poland but moved to France as a young age is listed as "French-Polish"; Wojciech Żywny, born in Czech but moved to Poland at a young age, is listed as "Czech-born Polish"; and '''Frédéric''' Chopin here is listed solely as "Polish"? ] (]) 19:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::A rose, by any other name, is still a rose. | |||
:::::The great Finnish patriot ] chose, in his published works, to use the French version of his given name ''Johan''. Did that make this famous composer, ], a Frenchman or any less a Finn? | |||
:::::And I do not take responsibility for the work of other editors of an article. ] (]) 22:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::Jean Sibelius did not hold French citizenship. Nor was he commonly referred to as "French" or "French-Finnish". T] (]) 23:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::You're also responsible for listing Wojciech Żywny as "Polish" too, are you not? ] (]) 23:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Did ''Chopin'' describe himself as French? | |||
::::::::After World War II, the future Nobel laureate ] (Joseph Rotblat) decided not to return to a Russian-dominated Poland and took out British citizenship. He spent most of his life in Britain but described himself as a "Pole with a British passport." Chopin had been in an analogous situation a century earlier, in France. ] (]) 05:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::You didn't answer my questions. I don't think you'll find anyone who denies Chopin was Polish. But you'd have a hard time finding eminent sources who would deny that he was in any sense French also - due to the fact that he applied for and received French citizenship. But I see this "argument", if these posts even dignify such a description, is going nowhere. Do what you will. And please do change the title to "Fryderyk Szopen", by your own reasoning this is appropriate. ] (]) 11:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::See ]. ] (]) 15:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::Ah, the plot thickens. So, Toccata quarta, you agree his real name was actually "Fryderyk Szopen" then? Interesting... ] (]) 19:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
I've added a reliable source saying he was Polish-French. No sources previously existed saying he was either Polish-French or Polish.]<sup>]. ]</sup> 19:13, 19 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Even my compromise saying his nationality was disputed has been undone, and the sources I used removed. We need further discussion]<sup>]. ]</sup> 09:39, 20 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
One of the users continuously keeps writing that Chopin was "Polish-French" in this article. I specially created a subsection called "Nationality" in which I use documented evidence to prove that Chopin viewed himself as a Pole, not as being French, and felt foreign when exiled in France. I used the sources that user keeps putting back in to that section. From the sources I use, it is clear that Chopin viewed himself as a Pole, and so did contemporaries as have historians. Thus the sources that call him "Polish-French" are few, the exception, and largely inaccurate. Chopin is linked to Polishness; his music reflects Polish nationalism strongly, and he was a passionate Polish patriot. I even use a source that says that it was never disputed that Chopin was a Pole. Also, it is worth noting that Chopin's French-born father (Gunter Grass's mother was of Polish-Kashubian origin, so why don't we call him a "Polish-German" writer? Why isn't Albert Camus - who was born in Algeria and whose mother was a Spaniard - a "French-Spanish-Algerian" writer? We don't but this user's logic we should) had Polish ancestry and moved to Poland at the tender age of 16 and fought in Poland's anti-Russian insurgencies and became assimilated into Polish society. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Inferences from sources are original research. 3 v 6 is not a small minority. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::If you would, make that 3 to 7. I don't have a dog in this fight except to point out the general absurdity of hyphenated citizenship. (You might want to look at ] for further insight on this. I don't see any great move afoot to classify Frenchmen in France by their various hyphens. Else we'd have Greco-French, Celto-French and a half hundred others. ] (]) 01:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Looking for help integrating new Musopen Chopin content == | |||
Hello, | |||
Musopen is in the process of launching a project to record and release the works of Frederic Chopin for free. As part of this project we will also be writing and releasing content for most of the pieces (liner notes). I wanted to post here in case anyone wanted to either help write content or integrate what we create with existing Misplaced Pages Chopin articles. | |||
The project is here: www.kickstarter.com/projects/Musopen/set-chopin-free | |||
Please let me know if you'd be interested in helping or have any general tips for us. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Aaron <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== More refs == | |||
Hi, I'm going through the article and referencing whatever I can, and I will be adding quite a few {{tl|citation needed}}s. I currently have access to Zamoyski's book, but once I've referenced everything I can from it I will probably look in the other sources. The tags are there so that we know which bits the refs refer to and which bits need referencing. I don't intend to ]. Best wishes, ''']]]''' 13:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Just adding that for know I'm just focusing on the refs, not the formatting. I'm probably putting in lots of duplicate refs, but I'll clear that up after everythings reffed. In my opinion, it's better to have lots of refs formatted badly than to have only a few well-formatted ones. Best wishes, ''']''' (]) 20:34, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Yes, it has been discussed to death before == | |||
Type in "nationality" into the field in the archive box. There's at least ten relevant discussions in the past. | |||
Unless there's some brand new development or completely novel argument, please respect ] and drop the ] and the edit warring. Thanks. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:What consensus? Those sections seem to be arguments ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
And for this kind of article, and this issue in particular, the Telegraph is simply not a reliable source. Not to mention that it doesn't say what you claim it says.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:If newspapers are not reliable, why is there a 'cite news' option? And it does say that it is disputed.]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Read the archives first. Then come up with a *new* argument or stop wasting people's time.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Aren't sources given more weight than arguments (not agreement) on the talk page, per ] and ]? ]<sup>]. ]</sup> | |||
:::Read the archives first. We've been over this ground. What matter is ].<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 00:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::For example .<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 00:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::Talk page discussions are not reliable sources. See ] and ]]<sup>]. ]</sup> 13:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::You know, won't make people to take you more seriously.--] (]) 15:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
A middle ground might be an option presented at the Curie article, '''Polish, French-naturalized'''. I definitely would not say '''French-Polish''', if the compromise isn't accepted, then '''Polish''' would be my vote. I do agree that anyone who does should be completely ignored. :) Does the editor questioning the article actual write any articles? I'm just looking at the User contribution listing ... ] (]) 16:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:I mainly just make minor edits, and Volunteer Marek made the first revert in the ], your statement is also a personal attack. And it isn't really much of a compromise. Also see ]. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 16:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I'm looking back at your contribution list (and diffs) and a see a rather long list of reverts and fact tags. I'm just making a statement of fact. Volunteer Marek knows that this article is one of the "touchy ones" on EN:WP. And Staberinde does bring up the good point that you did edit the Chopin section of ] - which only makes the point that article is trying to make. Many moons ago I too was like you, trying to patrol the wikispaces looking to right the wrongs all before breakfast. But the best way to help is to (a) not take this whole WP thing seriously -if a fact is slightly wrong, the earth does NOT stop spinning on it's axis and (b) put your energy into doing some heavy editing on articles that are of interest to you and need some help - there a LOT of ] that need help. If you'd like a mentor, I'd be glad to help where I can. ] (]) 17:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Almost all of my reverts are reverts of vandalism or unsourced content additions. And attack the content, not the contributor ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 17:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::No, all your reverts are mindless, disruptive edit warring, many with misleading and false edit summaries. In all the edit warring you've been engaged in since October 19 there's not a single reversion of vandalism. And as has been pointed out to you, there's over 8000 sources to choose from to source a trivial fact.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 12:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::If you actually bothered to look at my contributions you'd see that what you are saying is false. And please see ]. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 12:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::Not as far as this article goes.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 12:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::My contributions were being talked about, not my edits to this article. The same could be said about your edits to the article. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 12:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== RfC: Chopin's nationality == | |||
{{rfc|bio|pol|soc|his|rfcid=939B2DE}} | |||
Should we mention Chopin's nationality as Polish or Polish-French? A debate on this has been simmering on for sometime now. | |||
Here are some of the discussions pertaining to this issue | |||
*] | |||
*] (second discussion) | |||
*] (third discussion) | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
As ], here are some solutions which are being considered for proposal: | |||
*'''Solution A''' - Describe Chopin as Polish in the lead | |||
*'''Solution B''' - Describe Chopin as Polish-French in the lead | |||
*'''Solution C''' - Describe Chopin as Polish and French in the lead | |||
*'''Solution D''' - Describe Chopin as Polish, French-naturalized in the lead | |||
*'''Solution E''' - Do not describe his nationality in the lead. Discuss it in the body of the article. | |||
The semi - protected icon is not showing up in the main article, only in the edit section. Is there intentional? | |||
Please weigh-in, indicating the solution(s) you support using the example format below. Include a brief explanation of your rationale. Or, alternatively, if you have some idea which hasn't previously been put forward, please let us know! | |||
P.S. Has there been an attempt at trying to list the page as pending changes protection instead of semi protection? | |||
Example format | |||
*'''Support A''' - He is clearly a Polish. - Example 1 (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2257 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support C''' - He is of Polish and French Nationality - Example 2 (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2257 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support E''' - It is too tough of an issue to deal with. Let's not mention it. - Example 3 (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2257 (UTC) | |||
Apologies in advance if these have already been answered. ] (]) 06:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thanks everyone for the suggestions/comments/opinions in advance! | |||
:Good question, and I'm not sure. It should last until 2028 per . It looks like it is indeed semi-protected, but the icon was not added; I'm not sure if that's something anyone can add. @]? '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">]]</span>''' 14:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Please note that this RfC should not be construed as a ] rather than an attempt to measure consensus. As always let's keep the conversations at a ] level and ], not contributors or their motives. | |||
:Huh. Maybe I'm missing something. {{ping|Wikieditor662}} can you give me an example of a ''temporarily'' semi-protected article that has the icon you want to see? the pp-semi template just puts an unsightly banner-tag on the top. ] ] 14:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
::Well, I believe the only other composers to be semi protected are ], ], and ], and the semi protection lock works fine on them as far as I'm aware. ] (]) 04:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support A''' - The sources indicated in the lead and in past discussions say that he is clearly Polish. ] (] - ]) 16:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Ah, ok, I added <nowiki>{{pp|small=yes}}</nowiki> to place the little silver icon. (It should be easier to find that in the documentation. Usually I just let the bot add it after I've placed a protection.) I'd rather not use pending changes because then we'll just have a flood of IP edits changing Chopin's nationality or birthdate showing in the history but not approved; in my opinion that's just a lot of unnecessary bother. ] ] 15:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support C''' - 3 vs 5 isn't much of a minority, and per ] it should say that he is Polish ''and'' Polish-French. Per ] it should say that he is Polish-French, but the sources have conflicting views, so per ] it should mention both. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Sounds good to me. Thank you! '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">]]</span>''' 23:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support A''', as that is by far the most common claim made in ]—see . ] (]) 08:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support A''', sources which describe him as a "Polish composer" out number sources which call him "Polish-French" by a factor of at least 10. No brainer, non-controversial, just a single disruptive user on a edit-war-path upsetting long standing ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 08:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::How many times do I have to refer you to ] and ]? It's a factor of much less than 10, because (And I've pointed this out to you repeatedly) adding words greatly decreases the number of Google search results. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 14:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2024 == | |||
*'''Support D''' to indicate that he composed and achieved fame while living in France. Also, all that discussion about his nationality and how he always considered himself Polish should be moved from the first paragraph of the lead into a later paragraph. The first paragraph should be about ''why'' he is notable, it should be concerned with his music and his work. ] (]) 12:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Frédéric Chopin|answered=yes}} | |||
*'''Support A'''- Chopin was a Pole who lived in France as an exile. I do not edit on this page but have a interest in and love classical music. --] (]) 13:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Also ] was a German composer and ] an Austrian even though both became American citizens. We would never refer to them as Americans--] (]) 19:44, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Change Maine name from frederic Francois Chopin to Fryderyk Franciszek Chopin He felt completely Polish and longed for Poland (that is why before his death he asked for his heart to rest in Poland). He changed his name only for practical reasons and so that the Russian authorities would not have a problem with him.the main name at the very beginning of the page is misleading ] (]) 20:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{not done}} We go by what reliable English language sources say. I think this may have been discussed previously. ] (]) 20:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::sorry i dont know about previous discussion ] (]) 20:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Those who say that Chopin had a French father decidedly overlook the fact that his mother came from a well-known (for those times) noble family (its origins go back to the Middle Ages), the krzyżanowski family of the świnka coat of arms, which at the very beginning of the debate makes Chopin 50% Polish and most historical sources agree that he was born in Poland. These arguments led me to believe that we should change Chopin's name to the Polish one he was born with and, in parentheses, write that he later changed it due to emigration problems (as it is now written that he was born under a surname, I propose a change). However, if anyone has sources confirming his Frenchness, please provide them ] (]) 20:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, I'm one of those who say that "Chopin had a French father". Because he did. What may have been written, on a Polish birth certificate (or a parish baptismal record), in 1810, doesn't necessarily dictate how his name is spelled, on English-language Misplaced Pages, in 2024? Regards. ] (]) 20:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Chopin never feld Polish, and all interesting music composed went through his times in Paris and France, he had to leave Poland to feel free, he caractarised the polish people as weak, especially when Russinas took over, its written in his letters to his familly, then he asked to be french citizen, he never returned to his birthplace in Poland, as all great musicians and creativity was alive in Paris.. lot of bias from neo nationalists in Poland will never hide the truth! the only link, affective link in Poland was his mother.. ] (]) 13:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Permanent dead link == | |||
*'''A'''. Did Chopin ever consider himself French? Don't people get to say who they are anymore? ] (]) 14:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Much as I disagree with some of the POV-pushing here, ] usually should not be used for determining nationality. ] (]) 14:44, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::The POV you and the other members of your tag team are pushing is nationalist propaganda, the POV I am 'pushing' is neutral. Read policies before making hypocritical personal attacks. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::#I'm not Polish, nor am I aware of having Polish ancestors. | |||
::::#"You are engaging in POV-pushing" is not a personal attack; "you are a(n) " is. ] (]) 18:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Where did I say that? ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Say what? You accused me of "pushing ... nationalist propaganda", and you deemed "POV-pushing"—a concept to which you have also referred—a personal attack. ] (]) 18:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Just because I prefer a neutral POV to your completely biased one, it doesn't mean I'm a POV pusher. And where did I say "you are a(n) "? ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::You didn't say that; after all, I never accused you of making a personal attack. ] (]) 19:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support A''' - mainly because I'm in agreement with ] in regards to how reliable sources state him. Plus, I believe from the La Jolla Music Society is an informative read on the very topic. ] (]) 16:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support A'''- as per {{cite book|author=Dale Tucker|title=Frederic Chopin|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=qD77nOcLAQ8C&pg=PA5|year=1998|publisher=Alfred Music Publishing|isbn=978-1-4574-0134-3|page=5}} - though French should be mentioned in the article as it is now - all is fine -- ] (]) 18:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)# | |||
::It isn't mentioned, because it was removed and then the page was protected to the ] ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 19:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Current version says in the lead "''Although Chopin's father was a Polonized Frenchman and Chopin himself was exiled in France from the age of 20 until his death, the composer always regarded himself as a Pole rather than a Frenchman"'' then outside the lead in the first section we say "''Chopin's father, Nicolas Chopin, was a Frenchman from Lorraine who had emigrated to Poland in 1787 at the age of sixteen''" - thus we can all imply hes of French heritage because of his fathers. This is how most bio confront the situation as we do here - {{cite book|author= V. K. Subramanian|title=The Great Ones|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6nuJr6nky9sC&pg=PA225|year=2004|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=978-81-7017-421-9|page=225}}. -- ] (]) 19:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::By 'most bios' are you referring to the number of Google hits or the sources provided (which is 5 v 4)? And the article mentions that he was '''not''' French. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 19:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::General statement - out of all the "book sources" (dont care about Google hits of non scholarly websites or news papers) I can find only one small bio that mentions both Polish-French at {{cite book|author=William J. Roberts|title=France: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ogdZu2l2CYkC&pg=PA214|year=2004|publisher=Infobase Publishing|isbn=978-0-8160-4473-3|page=214}} -- ] (]) 19:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::But did you search for Polish-French? And are you sure Encyclopedia Britannica is non'''-'''scholarly? ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 20:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::We are only here to regurgitate what the majority of sources say and in the manner they say it. We have lots of space here thus we have more then enough room to explain the situation and not just a small bio trying to jam all in a few paragraphs. We have done this in the article pretty well I think (first time here today). Even non scholarly articles like confront the situation. So from what I am reading all over they refer to his "nationally" as Polish and in the same breath say he was "ethnically" half-French. -- ] (]) 20:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::And by 'majority' do you mean 5 vs 4? Or are you talking about 5 vs 0 because the 4 supporting the fact that he was Polish-French removed by a biased POV pusher? ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 20:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Yes Britannica and the book ''France : a reference guide from the Renaissance to the present'' say this - in the case of Britannica they are trying to get you to read on with a subscription....thus both are very small bios trying to say a lot in a confined space. The book {{cite book|author=Jacqueline Dineen|title=Frederic Chopin|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=pk62XX4jGiEC&pg=PA4|year=1998|publisher=Lerner Publications|isbn=978-1-57505-248-9|page=4}} does not say this in the copy I can read. - as in his "nationality" was French. As for ''Northern light : the Skagen painter'' I cant see it but why a panting book as a source? So from what I can see in the majority of source that I have found today that cover the topic in-depth say his "nationally" is Polish with a French background - as we explain in this article. I see no problem in expanding the section "Nationality" but to add this contentions point in the lead as if it was fact without explanation as we do later is not serving our readers well. -- ] (]) 22:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:*'''Support E'''. Came here via RFC, so not involved. I like the way cut the cake. It is ok to not put the nationality of people front and center and then give full details late. Say he was Polish-Born in the lead, then have the nationality section down below really go into it. That is informative while not distracting from the guy's works and life. I know the issue is , but I think being broad in the lead and having a good nationality section could make for a much improved article. Best of luck. ] (]) 07:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
This link from the "Further reading" section: , has become a gambling website. Should I delete this and keep the archived link? <span style="font-family:Verdana; background-color: #93F0FF">]]</span> 23:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:*'''Support A'''. Where '']'' is concerned, ] has exposed the heart of the matter. On the subject of ], ''E.B.'' is sloppy and perfunctory and cannot be a guide to the much more precise and comprehensive Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 15:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Sources are not unreliable just because they oppose your view. And Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source, see ]. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 16:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::''Encyclopaedia Britannica'''s expression, "Polish-French", ''is'' sloppy. What on earth does it mean? | |||
::::::Does it refer to a given individual's ], ], sense of ], or ], or to some combination of these? | |||
::::::Or does the expression refer to these characteristics in relation to the individual's ''parents''? | |||
::::::Perhaps a mathematician could calculate for us the doubtless large number of possible combinations of characteristics that can lurk behind the vague expression, "Polish-French"? ] (]) 10:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:I've removed it - non-English links aren't generally included per ]. ] (]) 00:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:*'''Support A''', or (less-preferred, because not really relevant in the lead, but acceptable) '''D'''. At the time when I was active editing WP, (and was hoping to bring this article up to GA quality) I gave a lot of thought to this issue. All reliable musical dictionaries, critics and biographers regard Chopin as Polish. And he regarded himself as Polish. There is no problem providing citations for all this. The fact that he took French nationality (which was a convenience for him) made him legally French, I suppose, but this is trivial in the context of his music, which did not draw on French sources, as I hope the maturing article will point out when it starts being edited properly once again. I don't see in Misplaced Pages, e.g., ] being described as American , even though his mother was an American and he himself received honorary American citizenship. Incidentally the cluster of notes in the first two sentences of the lead section should surely be removed, according to WP:MOS. The right place to explain in cited detail about squabbles of this sort is in the text, not the lead. I also believe the second sentence of the lead belongs in the body of the article as being WP:UNDUE in this section; later in the lead in the second paragraph Chopin's residence in France is quite adequately described, and the 'after age of 20' doesn't need to be anticipated in the first paragraph. Best, --] (]) 18:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Dead link (part 2) == | |||
:::Agree completely with Smerus. The sentence "Although Chopin's father was a Polonized Frenchman and Chopin himself was exiled in France from the age of 20 until his death, the composer always regarded himself as a Pole rather than a Frenchman." should be removed from the lead altogether - all this polemic over his nationality is not nearly as important as his impact on piano technique and composition, as well as his importance in the emerging "star" culture surrounding great solo performers (especially pianists) - points which, in fact, are undercovered in the article itself. ] (]) 18:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:*'''Support A''' This entire controversy is absurd. ] (]) 02:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
The URL for British Library Sounds is inaccessible at the moment. While I was able to found an archive URL that supports the statement in the "Recording" section, the archived URL does not have full information on the list of artists whose records have been saved in the library. What should we do about this? <span style="font-family:Verdana; background-color: #93F0FF">]]</span> 19:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:*Further my post supporting '''A''': From Moritz Karasowski, ''Frederic Chopin: His Life and Letters'' (1906), volume II, page 368: "When remains were lowered into the grave, Polish earth was scattered on the coffin. It was the same that Chopin had brought from the village of Wola nineteen years before as a memorial of his beloved fatherland, and shortly before his death had requested that if he might not rest in Polish soil his body might at least be covered with his native earth. Chopin's heart, which had beaten so warmly, and suffered so deeply for his country was, according to his desire, sent to the land whose sun had shone on his happy youth; it is preserved ''ad interim'' in the Church of the Sacred Cross at Warsaw." | |||
== Chopin and the Stalinist period in Poland == | |||
::Can we not let this poor piano-playing Pole (to paraphrase Paderewski) rest in peace? | |||
@] @] @] pinging three editors with highest contributions to this article about their thoughts on adding a paragraph on Chopin's reception in Stalinist Poland. | |||
::I move to close this RFP. ] (]) 13:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::As the sole Arthropod-American Misplaced Pages editor, I strongly second the motion. This whole thing is an example of what happens when you have a strongly POV minority trying to change articles. ] (]) 16:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::Don't you mean the ''N''POV minority? Anyway, ] and ] are core content policies, which cannot be superseded by consensus. So this means nothing. ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 16:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
This aspect, I think, becomes particularly interesting in 1949, the 100th anniversary of Chopin's death, when his work was coopted by Bierut's regime to craft a broader martyrological narrative of Poland on its way to socialism in line with state propaganda. The government exploited the work of other crucial Polish Romantic figures, most notably Adam Mickiewicz, in a similar manner. | |||
== Protected == | |||
There is limited scholarship on the topic, though a 2018 peer-reviewed article (see below) seems sufficient for this purpose. Given that this is an FA, I figured I would consult first before adding more information. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts (and, of course, potential contributions for other editors interested in this topic). | |||
Note that I have fully protected the article for two weeks, given persistent and ongoing edit-warring regarding the issue raised in the RfC above. If the RfC reaches a decision before protection expires, feel free to unprotect or request unprotection; otherwise, unfortunately for now any edits unrelated to nationality will need to be addressed via {{tl|editrequest}}. ] (]) 18:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Bruliński, Michał. "Chopin on Barricades: About the 100th Anniversary of Chopin’s Birth (1949) and Socialist Realism Doctrine in Poland." ''Kwartalnik Młodych Muzykologów UJ'' 01 (36) (2018): 77-114. ] 17:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Edit request == | |||
::I have the impression that Chopin took little interest in partisan politics. According to Misplaced Pages's "]" article, "Chopin was indifferent to Sand]]'s radical political pursuits, including her enthusiasm for the ] of 1848." | |||
{{editrequest|answered=yes}} | |||
::I wonder how Chopin might have viewed ]'s appropriation of him. | |||
Revert of Volunteer Marek's POV removal of statement (sources were removed as well). ]<sup>]. ]</sup> 18:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I wonder, also, what other Misplaced Pages readers and editors think? | |||
:Assuming you are referring to : request denied. Please re-read my statement above and note that until the RfC is closed, no one should be making or requesting any more changes dealing with his nationality. If you think that issues are being overlooked above, feel free to point that out civilly in the discussion above, or to ask for other opinions at ] or elsewhere. Please also be aware that you came very close to being blocked over edit-warring here, so continuing this dispute is a very bad idea. ] (]) 19:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::] (]) 21:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:This article is already rather long (just under the recommended 10,000 word page length), and I would be hesitent to add anything in which "there is limited scholarship" for, as you say; see ]. The reception section is currently set up to be more direct and detailed after Chopin's death, and then zoom out quite a bit to fit in the the next century. To suddenly zoom back into the latter would be a bit sudden. '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">]]</span>''' 04:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: In my opinion, this issue is a suitable topic for an academic essay (such as the one cited) but not relevant to a WP article on the composer. It tells nothing about Chopin, only about the way his name was used by political partisans over a century after his death. If there is a WP article on arts policy in Communist Poland (?is there?), it might merit a footnote there. Best, ] (]) 10:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:33, 10 January 2025
There is a request, submitted by User:EleniXDD, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages. The rationale behind the request is: "Featured article and an important subject in music". |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Frédéric Chopin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
faq page Frequently asked questions Q1: Why is Chopin described as a "Polish composer" in the lead (first paragraph)? A1: There is a consensus between Wikipedians that the majority of secondary reliable sources refer to Chopin as solely a Polish composer. See the last request for comment for further information. Q2: Why doesn't this article include more information on Chopin's sexuality? A2: Opinions on Chopin's sexuality, particularly as to whether he was homosexual, are equivocal or absent in the majority of secondary reliable sources. Since this article is a featured article, it is required to utilize only "high quality" sources; such sources do not generally give a direct declaration on whether Chopin was homosexual or not. See this request for comment for further information. Q3: Why doesn't this article give 22 February as Chopin's birthdate? A3: Although Chopin's baptismal record gives his birthdate as 22 February, this is now considered a mistake by modern scholars. Chopin himself and his family considered his true birthdate to be 1 March, which is now accepted by most scholars. See Britannica and the UK Chopin Society for further information. |
Frédéric Chopin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 17, 2014. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi protected glitch
The semi - protected icon is not showing up in the main article, only in the edit section. Is there intentional?
P.S. Has there been an attempt at trying to list the page as pending changes protection instead of semi protection?
Apologies in advance if these have already been answered. Wikieditor662 (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Good question, and I'm not sure. It should last until 2028 per this edit. It looks like it is indeed semi-protected, but the icon was not added; I'm not sure if that's something anyone can add. @Antandrus? Aza24 (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Huh. Maybe I'm missing something. @Wikieditor662: can you give me an example of a temporarily semi-protected article that has the icon you want to see? the pp-semi template just puts an unsightly banner-tag on the top. Antandrus (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I believe the only other composers to be semi protected are Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven, and the semi protection lock works fine on them as far as I'm aware. Wikieditor662 (talk) 04:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I added {{pp|small=yes}} to place the little silver icon. (It should be easier to find that in the documentation. Usually I just let the bot add it after I've placed a protection.) I'd rather not use pending changes because then we'll just have a flood of IP edits changing Chopin's nationality or birthdate showing in the history but not approved; in my opinion that's just a lot of unnecessary bother. Antandrus (talk) 15:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Thank you! Aza24 (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Maine name from frederic Francois Chopin to Fryderyk Franciszek Chopin He felt completely Polish and longed for Poland (that is why before his death he asked for his heart to rest in Poland). He changed his name only for practical reasons and so that the Russian authorities would not have a problem with him.the main name at the very beginning of the page is misleading 85.221.145.240 (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done We go by what reliable English language sources say. I think this may have been discussed previously. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- sorry i dont know about previous discussion 85.221.145.240 (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Those who say that Chopin had a French father decidedly overlook the fact that his mother came from a well-known (for those times) noble family (its origins go back to the Middle Ages), the krzyżanowski family of the świnka coat of arms, which at the very beginning of the debate makes Chopin 50% Polish and most historical sources agree that he was born in Poland. These arguments led me to believe that we should change Chopin's name to the Polish one he was born with and, in parentheses, write that he later changed it due to emigration problems (as it is now written that he was born under a surname, I propose a change). However, if anyone has sources confirming his Frenchness, please provide them 85.221.145.240 (talk) 20:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm one of those who say that "Chopin had a French father". Because he did. What may have been written, on a Polish birth certificate (or a parish baptismal record), in 1810, doesn't necessarily dictate how his name is spelled, on English-language Misplaced Pages, in 2024? Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chopin never feld Polish, and all interesting music composed went through his times in Paris and France, he had to leave Poland to feel free, he caractarised the polish people as weak, especially when Russinas took over, its written in his letters to his familly, then he asked to be french citizen, he never returned to his birthplace in Poland, as all great musicians and creativity was alive in Paris.. lot of bias from neo nationalists in Poland will never hide the truth! the only link, affective link in Poland was his mother.. 78.112.174.183 (talk) 13:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Permanent dead link
This link from the "Further reading" section: Chopin iconography, has become a gambling website. Should I delete this and keep the archived link? ChopinChemist 23:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed it - non-English links aren't generally included per WP:NONENGEL. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Dead link (part 2)
The URL for British Library Sounds is inaccessible at the moment. While I was able to found an archive URL that supports the statement in the "Recording" section, the archived URL does not have full information on the list of artists whose records have been saved in the library. What should we do about this? ChopinChemist 19:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Chopin and the Stalinist period in Poland
@Smerus @Nihil novi @Aza24 pinging three editors with highest contributions to this article about their thoughts on adding a paragraph on Chopin's reception in Stalinist Poland.
This aspect, I think, becomes particularly interesting in 1949, the 100th anniversary of Chopin's death, when his work was coopted by Bierut's regime to craft a broader martyrological narrative of Poland on its way to socialism in line with state propaganda. The government exploited the work of other crucial Polish Romantic figures, most notably Adam Mickiewicz, in a similar manner.
There is limited scholarship on the topic, though a 2018 peer-reviewed article (see below) seems sufficient for this purpose. Given that this is an FA, I figured I would consult first before adding more information. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts (and, of course, potential contributions for other editors interested in this topic).
Bruliński, Michał. "Chopin on Barricades: About the 100th Anniversary of Chopin’s Birth (1949) and Socialist Realism Doctrine in Poland." Kwartalnik Młodych Muzykologów UJ 01 (36) (2018): 77-114. Per Exemplum 17:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have the impression that Chopin took little interest in partisan politics. According to Misplaced Pages's "Frédéric Chopin" article, "Chopin was indifferent to Sand's radical political pursuits, including her enthusiasm for the February Revolution of 1848."
- I wonder how Chopin might have viewed Bolesław Bierut's appropriation of him.
- I wonder, also, what other Misplaced Pages readers and editors think?
- Nihil novi (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- This article is already rather long (just under the recommended 10,000 word page length), and I would be hesitent to add anything in which "there is limited scholarship" for, as you say; see due weight. The reception section is currently set up to be more direct and detailed after Chopin's death, and then zoom out quite a bit to fit in the the next century. To suddenly zoom back into the latter would be a bit sudden. Aza24 (talk) 04:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- In my opinion, this issue is a suitable topic for an academic essay (such as the one cited) but not relevant to a WP article on the composer. It tells nothing about Chopin, only about the way his name was used by political partisans over a century after his death. If there is a WP article on arts policy in Communist Poland (?is there?), it might merit a footnote there. Best, Smerus (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Spoken Misplaced Pages requests
- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles that are featured articles
- FA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in People
- FA-Class vital articles in People
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (musicians) articles
- High-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class Composers articles
- WikiProject Composers articles
- FA-Class France articles
- High-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- FA-Class Poland articles
- Top-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles